Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MECAMYLAMINE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1990

[3H]mecamylamine binding to rat brain membranes. Studies with mecamylamine and nicotine analogues.

Mecamylamine, an antagonist to nicotine, does not compete at the nicotinic recognition site, but is believed to block the ion channel of the nicotinic receptor. The present study demonstrates specific, saturable [3H]mecamylamine binding in rat brain membranes. [3H]Mecamylamine binding was destroyed by heating at 100 degrees and trypsin. Scatchard analysis revealed the presence of two sites with Kd values of 9.6 x 10(-8) and 1.1 x 10(-6) M and Bmax values of 7 x 10(-12) and 3 x 10(-11) mol/mg protein respectively. A good correlation was observed between the Ki values for [3H]mecamylamine binding of a number of mecamylamine and related analogues and their ability to block nicotine-induced prostration in rats and seizures in mice. Inorganic cations, particularly divalent, and various ion channel blockers, such as phencyclidine and verapamil, exhibited a high affinity for the [3H]mecamylamine site. Although mecamylamine did not block nicotine binding, nicotine and its analogues exhibited a high affinity for the [3H]mecamylamine site, a finding which suggests that nicotine acts directly on ion channels as well as the nicotinic cholinergic recognition sites. The data are consistent with the notion that mecamylamine interacts with the open ion channel of the nicotinic receptor.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Analysis of mecamylamine stereoisomers on human nicotinic receptor subtypes.

Because mecamylamine, a nicotinic receptor antagonist, is used so often in nicotine research and because mecamylamine may have important therapeutic properties clinically, it is important to fully explore and understand its pharmacology. In the present study, the efficacy and potency of mecamylamine and its stereoisomers were evaluated as inhibitors of human alpha 3 beta 4, alpha 3 beta 2, alpha 7, and alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), as well as mouse adult type muscle nAChRs and rat N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. The selectivity of mecamylamine for neuronal nAChR was manifested primarily in terms of slow recovery rates from mecamylamine-induced inhibition. Neuronal receptors showed a prolonged inhibition after exposure to low micromolar concentrations of mecamylamine. Muscle-type receptors showed a transient inhibition by similar concentrations of mecamylamine, and NMDA receptors were only transiently inhibited by higher micromolar concentrations. Mecamylamine inhibition of neuronal nAChR was noncompetitive and voltage dependent. Although there was little difference between S-(+)-mecamylamine and R-(-)-mecamylamine in terms of 50% inhibition concentration values for a given receptor subtype, there appeared to be significant differences in the off-rates for the mecamylamine isomers from the receptors. Specifically, S-(+)-mecamylamine appeared to dissociate more slowly from alpha 4 beta 2 and alpha 3 beta 4 receptors than did R-(-)-mecamylamine. In addition, it was found that muscle-type receptors appeared to be somewhat more sensitive to R-(-)-mecamylamine than to S-(+)-mecamylamine. Together, these findings suggest that in chronic (i.e., therapeutic) application, S-(+)-mecamylamine might be preferable to R-(-)-mecamylamine in terms of equilibrium inactivation of neuronal receptors with decreased side effects associated with muscle-type receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Rapid relief of block by mecamylamine of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors of rat chromaffin cells in vitro: an electrophysiological and modeling study.

The mechanism responsible for the blocking action of mecamylamine on neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) was studied on rat isolated chromaffin cells recorded under whole-cell patch clamp. Mecamylamine strongly depressed (IC(50) = 0.34 microM) inward currents elicited by short pulses of nicotine, an effect slowly reversible on wash. The mecamylamine block was voltage-dependent and promptly relieved by a protocol combining membrane depolarization with a nicotine pulse. Either depolarization or nicotine pulses were insufficient per se to elicit block relief. Block relief was transient; response depression returned in a use-dependent manner. Exposure to mecamylamine failed to block nAChRs if they were not activated by nicotine or if they were activated at positive membrane potentials. These data suggest that mecamylamine could not interact with receptors either at rest or at depolarized level. Other nicotinic antagonists like dihydro-beta-erythroidine or tubocurarine did not share this action of mecamylamine although proadifen partly mimicked it. Mecamylamine is suggested to penetrate and block open nAChRs that would subsequently close and trap this antagonist. Computer modeling indicated that the mechanism of mecamylamine blocking action could be described by assuming that 1) mecamylamine-blocked receptors possessed a much slower, voltage-dependent isomerization rate, 2) the rate constant for mecamylamine unbinding was large and poorly voltage dependent. Hence, channel reopening plus depolarization allowed mecamylamine escape and block relief. In the presence of mecamylamine, therefore, nAChRs acquire the new property of operating as coincidence detectors for concomitant changes in membrane potential and receptor occupancy.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Mecamylamine (a nicotine antagonist) for smoking cessation.

BACKGROUND: Mecamylamine is a nicotine antagonist (that is it blocks the effect of nicotine). The rationale for its use in smoking cessation is that it may block the rewarding effect of nicotine and thus reduce the urge to smoke. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to determine the effectiveness of mecamylamine in promoting smoking cessation, either alone or in combination with nicotine replacement therapy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group trials register. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of mecamylamine, either alone or in combination with nicotine replacement therapy, which reported smoking cessation rates at least six months after intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data in duplicate on the type of subjects, the dose and duration of the mecamylamine and nicotine treatments, side-effects of treatment, the outcome measures, method of randomisation, and completeness of follow-up. The main outcome measure was sustained abstinence from smoking (biochemically validated) after at least six months follow-up in patients smoking at baseline. Smokers lost to follow-up were regarded as being continuing smokers. Because of the preliminary nature of available data, we did not perform meta-analysis but report the results narratively. MAIN RESULTS: We identified two studies, both from the same investigators. In a study of 48 volunteers, a combination of mecamylamine plus nicotine patch was more effective than nicotine patch alone (abstinence rate at one year 37.5% vs 4.2%). In a second study, 80 volunteers were treated for four weeks prior to cessation with one of four treatments: 1. Nicotine patch plus mecamylamine capsules 2. Nicotine alone 3. Mecamylamine alone 4. No active drug. All four groups received combination treatment with nicotine and mecamylamine after the scheduled quit date. The abstinence rates in these four groups were respectively 40%, 20%, 15% and 15%. The higher abstinence rate in the group treated with combination therapy was not statistically significant. The authors reported a statistically significant benefit of mecamylamine using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. In the doses used, mecamylamine was well tolerated, although up to 40% of subjects required reductions in dose, usually because of constipation. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Data from two small studies suggest that the combination of nicotine and mecamylamine may be superior to nicotine alone in promoting smoking cessation. However, these results require confirmation in larger studies before the treatment can be recommended clinically.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1998

Nicotine-mecamylamine treatment for smoking cessation: the role of pre-cessation therapy.

The nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine was evaluated in a randomized smoking cessation trial. Four groups of participants (n = 20 per group) received nicotine plus mecamylamine, nicotine alone, mecamylamine alone, or no drug for 4 weeks before cessation. After the quit-smoking date, all subjects received nicotine plus mecamylamine treatment for 6 weeks. Nicotine skin patches (21 mg/24 hr) and mecamylamine capsules (2.5-5.0 mg twice per day) were used. Precessation mecamylamine significantly prolonged the duration of continuous smoking abstinence; abstinence rates at the end of treatment were 47.5% with mecamylamine and 27.5% without mecamylamine. Nicotine + mecamylamine reduced ad lib smoking, smoking satisfaction, and craving more than either drug alone. Moreover, the orthostatic decrease in blood pressure caused by mecamylamine was offset by nicotine. Mecamylamine before smoking cessation may be an effective adjunct to nicotine patch therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Nicotine-mecamylamine interactions.

OBJECTIVES: Mecamylamine blocks nicotinic cholinergic receptors and has been proposed, in combination with nicotine, as a novel therapy to aid smoking cessation. The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between transdermal mecamylamine and intravenous nicotine. STUDY DESIGN: Twelve cigarette smokers were studied while receiving transdermal mecamylamine 6 mg/24 h and placebo patches for 7 days each. On the fifth day of patch use, subjects received a combined infusion of deuterium-labeled nicotine and cotinine, with measurement of disposition kinetics of nicotine and cotinine, and cardiovascular and plasma catecholamine responses to nicotine. Half of the subjects were studied under alkaline urine conditions and the other half under acidic urine conditions. RESULTS: Steady-state plasma mecamylamine concentrations were twice as high (mean, 12.2 versus 6.3 ng/mL), consistent with lower renal clearance (2.1 versus 5.8 mL/min/kg) during alkaline compared with acidic urine conditions. Mecamylamine did not significantly affect the clearances of nicotine or cotinine. Mecamylamine significantly reduced the volume of distribution and inhibited the cardioacceleratory and epinephrine-releasing effects of nicotine. CONCLUSIONS: Mecamylamine has little effect on the clearance of nicotine and is not expected to affect steady-state levels during transdermal nicotine dosing. The reduction of the volume of distribution of nicotine by mecamylamine suggests that part of the antagonism of nicotinic central nervous system effects by mecamylamine may be due to a pharmacokinetic interaction-most likely decreased transport of nicotine into the brain or decreased binding to nicotine receptors. Mecamylamine may decrease the potential adverse cardiovascular effects of coadministered nicotine.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed2001

Mecamylamine effects on haloperidol-induced catalepsy and defecation.

Recent clinical experience with Tourette syndrome (TS) patients suggests that the nicotinic receptor antagonist, mecamylamine (Inversine), may be a useful adjunct to neuroleptic therapy for controlling tic symptom. This is consistent with previous preclinical findings demonstrating that mecamylamine can potentiate the cataleptic effects of neuroleptics in rats. However, these earlier preclinical studies employed high doses (1-2.5 mg/kg) of mecamylamine that may not be clinically relevant since human doses of mecamylamine used to treat TS have been much lower (0.03-0.1 mg/kg). In order to test the potential therapeutic properties of mecamylamine preclinically, we conducted catalepsy experiments in rats employing both a low and high dose of mecamylamine in combination with haloperidol. Sixty-four male Sprague Dawley rats were randomized into four treatment groups (n = 16/group). Each rat received an injection of either saline or mecamylamine (0.1 or 3.0 mg/kg s.c.) followed one hour later with a second injection of either saline or haloperidol (0.4 mg/kg s.c.). The bar test was used to measure duration of catalepsy at 3 hrs following the second injection. The results demonstrated that only the mecamylamine treated rats showed statistically significant haloperidol-induced catalepsy when measured at 3 hrs. In addition, haloperidol-induced defecation was not affected by the 0.1 mg/kg mecamylamine dose, but completely abolished by the 3.0 mg/kg dose. These findings suggest that a clinically relevant dose of mecamylamine (0.1 mg/kg) can affect the duration of haloperidol-induced catalepsy without having significant effects on gastrointestinal function.

Animals↗
PubMed1976

The influence of mecamylamine on contractions induced by different agonists and on the role of calcium ions in the isolated rabbit aorta.

The exposure of helically cut strips of rabbit aorta to mecamylamine (1 mM) for 5 minutes blocked the histamine (3.25 muM)-induced contractions completely and reduced those induced by potassium (25mM, 68%) without affecting contractions induced by norepinephrine (3.0 muM, NE) or acetylcholine (10 muM). Mecamylamine, by itself, did not exhibit agonist activity, but it increased the contractile tension of the muscle which was contracted by NE. The responses to NE were either enhanced or not affected by small doses of mecamylamine (1 mM), but were partially blocked by large doses of mecamylamine (10 mM). The antagonism exhibited by mecamylamine in low doses (1 mM) against the above agonists was reversible. The shape of the response to NE on the muscle, which was treated with a high dose of mecamylamine (20 mM) and washed, was significantly different from that of the control. Our results are consistent with the following conclusions: 1) Mecamylamine in low doses (1 mM) blocks the histamine receptor and therefore the histamine-induced contractions. Two molecules of mecamylamine are competitive with 1 molecule of histamine. 2) Mecamylamine blocks the potassium-induced contractions, but does not block completely the calcium influx in the potassium-depolarized muscles. Therefore, it may interfere partially with the utilization of extracellular or loosely bound calcium during potassium-induced contractions. 3) Mecamylamine in high doses (10 mM) partially blocks norepinephrine-induced contractions by affecting firmly bound calcium stores. 4) Procaine antagonizes the effects of NE, histamine and acetylcholine by affecting, at least partially, the firmly bound calcium stores.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2001

Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of mecamylamine monotherapy for Tourette's disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy of mecamylamine as a monotherapy in children and adolescents with Tourette's disorder (TD) was investigated in an 8-week multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. METHOD: Eligible subjects included subjects with TD (DSM-IV), with a naturalistic mix of comorbid diagnoses, nonsmokers, aged 8 to 17 years, whose behavioral and emotional symptoms (according to parents) were more disturbing than tics. After a washout period of all psychotropic medication, subjects were randomly assigned to either mecamylamine (n = 29) or placebo (n = 32). Mecamylamine doses ranged from 2.5 to 7.5 mg/day. Primary efficacy measures included the Tourette's Disorder Scale-Clinician Rated (TODS-CR) and 21-point Clinical Global Improvement scale; secondary efficacy measures included the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale and a rage-attack scale (RAScal). RESULTS: Of the 61 subjects who were randomized, 50 (82%) completed at least 3 weeks on medication and 38 (62%) completed the full 8-week trial. Study withdrawals included 12/29 on mecamylamine and 11/32 on placebo. For the total sample, mecamylamine was no more effective than placebo on any of the outcome measures. However, an item analysis of the TODS-CR suggested that mecamylamine may have reduced sudden mood changes and depression in moderately to severely affected subjects. Except for a slight increase in heart rate during the 1st week in both the mecamylamine and the placebo groups, there where no significant mecamylamine-related changes in vital signs, electrocardiogram, complete blood cell count, or blood chemistry values. CONCLUSIONS: Mecamylamine, in doses up to 7.5 mg/day, is well tolerated in children and adolescents, but as a monotherapy it does not appear to be an effective treatment for tics or for the total spectrum of symptoms associated with TD. However, further studies should be conducted to investigate its possible therapeutic effects in subjects with comorbid mood disorders and as an adjunct to neuroleptic medication.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Mecamylamine, a nicotinic receptor channel antagonist, affects amylase secretion by isolated pancreatic acinar cells.

It is well established that CCK is a potent stimulator of amylase secretion from the pancreatic acinar cells, while nicotine is an effective inhibitor of such secretion. The present study was conducted to determine whether mecamylamine, a well-established ganglionic blocker drug, could influence amylase secretion from the pancreas. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were fasted, sacrificed, the pancreas removed, and pancreatic acinar cells isolated and purified. The cells were equally divided into 4 different flasks and treated with the following solutions: (control), 10 mM nicotine, 10 microM mecamylamine or 100 microM mecamylamine. The cells were washed twice after 30 min incubation at 37 degrees C, resuspended in HR buffer, and amylase release in response to graded doses of CCK-8 was measured in cells from each flask. The study was repeated four times. Basal amylase release was not different by treatment with nicotine or different doses of mecamylamine. In response to CCK-8, amylase release was decreased by nicotine and by mecamylamine (100 microM) when compared with control. Amylase release was similar between control and mecamylamine (10 microM). Peak amylase released with the maximal dose of CCK-8 (1 x 10(-10) M) was less in cells treated with nicotine when compared with those measured cells treated with saline or with the two doses of mecamylamine. The release of amylase was suppressed in a similar manner in all treatment groups in response to supramaximal (3 x 10(-10) to 1 x 10(-9) M) doses of CCK-8. Mecamylamine, at the high dose, acts on isolated pancreatic acinar cells to decrease amylase release in a manner similar to that found with nicotine. Both of these drugs, nicotine and mecamylamine, may act via CCK receptors via two different intracellular mechanisms.

Amylases↗
PubMed2000

Effects of the nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine on inspection time.

RATIONALE: Several lines of evidence suggest that nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAchRs) are involved in speed of information processing, and inspection time appears to be particularly sensitive to nicotinic manipulation. OBJECTIVE: The present study sought to examine the effects of the nAchR antagonist mecamylamine on inspection time. Furthermore, the extent to which the anticholinesterase donepezil would reverse the effects of mecamylamine on inspection time was also examined. METHODS: A double-blind, repeated measures design was employed. Subjects (n = 6) received placebo, mecamylamine (20 mg PO) or mecamylamine (20 mg PO) and donepezil (5 mg PO). Inspection time and physiological measures were then assessed. RESULTS: The mecamylamine condition and the mecamylamine and donepezil condition were associated with an increase in heart rate, when compared to the placebo condition. There was a significant slowing of inspection time in the mecamylamine condition; compared to placebo, which was partly reversed by donepezil. CONCLUSIONS: The slowing of inspection time following mecamylamine is consistent with the role of nAchRs in speed of information processing, and add to the evidence that IT may in part index nAchR system integrity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

A cholinergic antagonist, mecamylamine, blocks light-induced fos immunoreactivity in specific regions of the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Recent studies have shown that light-induced phase shifts of the circadian rhythm of locomotor activity are associated with c-fos expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of rodents. In order to explore further the importance of c-fos expression for the phase-shifting effects of light, we examined the effects of mecamylamine on light-induced Fos-like immunoreactivity (Fos-lir) in the SCN. Mecamylamine was chosen because it is a cholinergic antagonist that blocks the phase-shifting effects of light on the circadian activity rhythm in the golden hamster. Golden hamsters were entrained for at least 14 days to a 14 h light: 10 h dark photoperiod. Animals were then placed in constant darkness (DD) and during exposure to DD were subjected to one or more of the following treatments: (1) vehicle alone; (2) mecamylamine alone (450 micrograms, i.c.v.) at circadian time (CT) 19; (3) vehicle plus a light pulse at CT 19; (4) mecamylamine 10 min prior to the light pulse at CT 19. Mecamylamine blocked the phase-shifting effects of light on the circadian rhythm of locomotor activity when compared to vehicle-treated animals (P < 0.001). A light pulse at CT 19 induced Fos-lir in the SCN within 1 h, whereas treatment with vehicle or mecamylamine had no noticeable effect on Fos-lir in the SCN. Mecamylamine pretreatment dramatically reduced light-induced Fos-lir in the SCN by 75%. The most striking observation was the clear inhibition of Fos-lir by mecamylamine in the dorsomedial region of the SCN while there was little inhibition of Fos-lir in the most ventral portions of the SCN.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Nicotine induced seizures blocked by mecamylamine and its stereoisomers.

Recent genetic research has shown that certain forms of epilepsy may arise from mutations in the genes encoding for the alpha7 and alpha4 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) ion channels. These receptors are also involved with the induction of nicotine-induced seizures. (+/-)-Mecamylamine (Inversine), a classic nAChR antagonist, potently inhibits nicotine-induced seizures. The purpose of the present study was to assess the inhibitory effects of (+/-)-mecamylamine and its stereoisomers on nicotine-induced seizures in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Rats received saline, (+/-)-mecamylamine, R-(-)-mecamylamine, or S-(+)-mecamylamine (s.c.) at doses of 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 mg/kg 15 minutes prior to nicotine injection, 3.6 mg/kg (s.c.), an optimal dose for seizure induction. Rats were observed for 30 minutes with seizure latency, duration, and severity as primary measures and locomotor activity recorded as a secondary measure at 5-minute intervals. The results indicate that mecamylamine and each of its stereoisomers block nicotine-induced seizures in a dose-related manner and suggest that the S-(+/-)- mecamylamine isomer has inhibitory properties more similar to the racemic than to the R-(-)-mecamylamine isomer. The results of this study may be clinically important for the future design of novel anti-seizure medications.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Mecamylamine interactions with galantamine and donepezil: effects on learning, acetylcholinesterase, and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Patch-clamp recordings of single ion channel activity demonstrated that donepezil, but not galantamine, could be blocked by the nicotinic cholinergic antagonist mecamylamine, suggesting that galantamine acted at a separate (allosteric) site. The aim of this experiment was to demonstrate at a whole organism, behavioral level that galantamine, but not donepezil, could reverse mecamylamine-induced learning impairment. Forty-four young female rabbits received 15 sessions in the 750-ms delay eyeblink classical conditioning procedure, after one of five drug treatments: 0.5 mg/kg mecamylamine, 3.0 mg/kg donepezil, 0.5 mg/kg mecamylamine plus 3.0 mg/kg galantamine, 0.5 mg/kg mecamylamine plus 3.0 mg/kg donepezil, or sterile saline vehicle. An additional 24 young female rabbits were tested in the explicitly unpaired condition after treatment with the same mecamylamine plus galantamine or donepezil combinations or with vehicle. In a previous study we demonstrated that 3.0 mg/kg galantamine facilitated learning in young rabbits. Donepezil (3.0 mg/kg) did not facilitate learning in this experiment. However, both galantamine and donepezil reversed the deleterious effects of mecamylamine on learning. Significant differences in plasma and brain acetylcholinesterase levels were detected among the drug treatment groups. Fifteen daily injections did not produce statistically significant changes in nicotinic receptor binding in any of the five treatment groups. One possible interpretation of these results is that donepezil affected nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by raising the synaptic level of acetylcholine and hence, the probability of receptor activation, whereas galantamine bound to distinct allosteric sites not blocked by mecamylamine.

Acetylcholinesterase↗
PubMed1994

Mecamylamine combined with nicotine skin patch facilitates smoking cessation beyond nicotine patch treatment alone.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate concurrent administration of mecamylamine (nicotine antagonist) with nicotine skin patch treatment for smoking cessation. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Forty-eight healthy smokers who smoked at least one pack per day were studied at an outpatient smoking cessation research clinic. The subjects ranged in age from 20 to 40 years. Intervention with the nicotine skin patch (6 to 8 weeks) plus oral mecamylamine (2.5 to 5 mg twice a day for 5 weeks) was compared to nicotine patch plus placebo. Mecamylamine treatment began 2 weeks before smoking cessation. The primary outcome was continuous abstinence through 7 weeks after cessation (1 week after treatment), confirmed by expired air carbon monoxide measurements. Secondary measures included point abstinence at 7 weeks, continuous abstinence at 6- and 12-month follow-up, and self-reported withdrawal symptoms. RESULTS: The continuous abstinence rate at 7 weeks was three times higher in the mecamylamine condition: 50% versus 16.7%, p = 0.015. Point abstinence at 7 weeks was 58% for mecamylamine versus 29% for placebo, p = 0.044. At follow-up, continuous abstinence remained higher for mecamylamine: 37.5% versus 12.5% at 6 months (p = 0.046) and 37.5% versus 4.2% at 12 months (p = 0.004). Mecamylamine also significantly reduced craving for cigarettes, negative affect, and appetite. CONCLUSIONS: Agonist-antagonist therapy, consisting of the nicotine patch with oral mecamylamine, may substantially improve current smoking cessation treatment.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed2003

Short-term pharmacokinetics and brain distribution of mecamylamine as a preliminary to carbon-11 labeling for nicotinic receptor investigation.

As a preliminary to development and evaluation of labeled mecamylamine as a potential in vivo imaging ligand for human central nicotinic receptors (nAchRs), this work was intended to determine whether the pharmacokinetic properties of mecamylamine are suitable for experimental studies using (11)C-radiolabeled mecamylamine preliminary to positron emission tomography (PET) in humans. An original gas chromatographic method for rapid and simple determination of mecamylamine in biological samples was developed and validated (within run precision, 3.8-5.2%; between assay variation, 5.3-6.9%; assay accuracy, 5.6-11.8%). The results of the pharmacokinetic investigation in the rat demonstrated a very fast clearance of mecamylamine from blood [half-life, 1.2 h; clearance (CL), 1.2 L/kg/h) concomitant with an uptake that was higher in kidney, intermediate in lung, and lower in heart, liver, and brain. Brain tissue kinetics of mecamylamine showed a similar pattern for all the regions, with a rapid increase followed by a plateau after 15 min. This plateau differed according to the region of the brain; it was higher in colliculi, hippocampus, and cortex (area of high density of nAchRs) than in cerebellum or white matter (area with a limited population of nAchRs). No other lipophilic metabolites that were able to disturb the specific binding to nAchRs were identified during the investigation. Thus, mecamylamine shows peculiar qualities making it a good candidate for carbon-11 labeling for experimental studies in view of final PET imaging.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Effects of systemic and intracerebroventricular administration of mecamylamine, a nicotinic cholinergic antagonist, on spatial memory in rats.

The effects of both systemic and intracerebroventricular administration of mecamylamine, a nicotinic antagonist, were tested on the Morris water maze performance of rats. In experiment 1, mecamylamine (0, 3, and 10 mg/kg, IP) was administered before daily training sessions on the Morris water maze, a task in which rats use environmental cues to learn the location of an invisible escape platform in a large pool of water. The escape latencies of rats given the higher dose of mecamylamine were significantly longer than the latencies of rats given either saline or the peripherally-acting nicotinic antagonist hexamethonium (10 mg/kg). Analysis of search patterns during a free swim trial conducted in the absence of an escape platform confirmed the disruptive effects of the higher dose of mecamylamine. Similar drug effects were not observed when these rats were trained to a visible platform, and mecamylamine did not affect the retrieval of spatial information in well-trained rats. In experiment 2, similar effects were observed with ICV administration of mecamylamine (0, 10, 30, and 100 micrograms). The two higher doses increased escape latencies during the last day of place training and all three doses significantly impaired performance on a free swim. No significant effects were noted on subsequent training to a visible platform, and only the highest dose marginally impaired the retrieval of spatial information in well-trained animals. Thus, mecamylamine appears to impair the acquisition of spatial information in the Morris water maze but does not affect retrieval of previously acquired spatial information at comparable doses.

Animals↗