Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MANOMETRY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Reduced risk for pancreatitis after endoscopic microtransducer manometry of the sphincter of Oddi: a randomized comparison with the perfusion manometry technique.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic microtransducer manometry of the sphincter of Oddi has been shown to be a reliable alternative to perfusion manometry for evaluating sphincter of Oddi motor function. It avoids volume loading of the biliopancreatic system, and may therefore be associated with a lower risk of inducing postmanometry pancreatitis.[nl] PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 2-year period, microtransducer manometry of the sphincter of Oddi was carried out in 215 patients (median age 42 years; 155 women; biliary study in 152 cases, additional pancreatic evaluation in 63 cases). Sphincter of Oddi manometry was conducted as the sole procedure in all patients. The frequency of pancreatitis was assessed prospectively and graded according to established guidelines. A total of 130 consecutive patients (median age 37 years, 92 women; 30 with biliary type II, 58 with type III, 34 with pancreatic type I, and eight with type II) were then randomly assigned to undergo microtransducer or perfusion manometry of the sphincter of Oddi in a standardized fashion. RESULTS: During the initial 2-year period, nine cases of pancreatitis (a pancreatitis frequency of 4.2 %) were observed after microtransducer manometry, and most were of mild degree (six mild, two moderate, and one severe). No deaths occurred, and no surgical procedures were required. In the randomized part of the study, the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients in both groups, as well as the technical aspects of the procedures performed, were well matched. The frequency of pancreatitis after microtransducer manometry was 3.1 %, compared with 13.8 % after perfusion manometry ( P < 0.05). Pancreatitis occurred in two patients after microtransducer manometry, and was mild in both cases. After perfusion manometry, mild pancreatitis occurred in six patients and moderate pancreatitis in three. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic microtransducer manometry of the sphincter of Oddi is associated with a lower risk for postmanometry pancreatitis than standard perfusion manometry.

Adult↗

Antroduodenal manometry: 24-hour ambulatory monitoring versus short-term stationary manometry in patients with functional dyspepsia.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the interdigestive and postprandial antroduodenal motility patterns of patients with functional dyspepsia using prolonged ambulatory antroduodenal manometry and to compare these findings with conventional stationary manometry. METHODS: Prolonged ambulatory and short-term stationary antroduodenal manometry were performed in 10 patients with functional dyspepsia and in 10 healthy volunteers (controls). RESULTS: During stationary manometry only a few interdigestive motor complex (MMC) cycles were recorded. Using the ambulatory technique, fewer MMC cycles were observed in patients than in controls (2.2 +/- 0.63 and 4.1 +/- 0.54, respectively; P = 0.030). During phase II of the MMC, both techniques showed a higher antral motility index in patients (P = 0.017 and P = 0.049 for stationary and ambulatory manometry, respectively). The postprandial antral motility index was similar for patients and controls using stationary manometry. With the ambulatory technique, the antral motility index 1-1.5 h after breakfast was lower in patients than in controls (P = 0.020). Both techniques showed that the patients had a higher duodenal motility index after dinner and after breakfast (P < 0.05). Both techniques revealed more burst activity in patients than in controls (stationary: 10.7 versus 1.8% of the time; ambulatory: 1.7 versus 0.2% of the time; P = 0.004 and P = 0.051, respectively). Using a 10-min window period before the onset of symptoms, seven symptom episodes (33.3%) were found to be related to burst activity and retrograde or non-propagated phase III activity. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory manometry is superior to stationary manometry for evaluating patients with functional dyspepsia, because patients can be studied for a prolonged period (allowing adequate evaluation of interdigestive abnormalities) and under physiological conditions. Prolonged monitoring also allows assessment of the relationship between symptoms and motor abnormalities.

Adult↗

Endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry with a portable electronic microtransducer system: comparison with the perfusion manometry method and routine clinical application.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic perfusion manometry (PM) of the sphincter of Oddi (SO) requires expensive equipment which is relatively large and uncomfortable to handle in the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) setting. Furthermore, the volume load of the biliopancreatic system may contribute to the increased risk of pancreatitis after SO manometry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The newly developed small and lightweight microtransducer system consists of a portable data-logger with integrated online display which is connected to a 4-Fr manometry probe. The manometry catheter is inserted endoscopically into the biliopancreatic system via a 7-Fr Teflon sheath. SO motility can be observed online on the display but the data can also be stored for later analysis on a personal computer (PC). To validate the new method, 15 patients with suspected biliary SO dysfunction underwent both PM as well as microtransducer manometry (MTM) in randomized order. Thereafter, 50 consecutive patients with suspected biliary or pancreatic SO dysfunction were investigated solely by MTM. RESULTS: PM was possible in 13 of 15 cases whereas MTM could be performed in all 15 patients. The basal SO pressure tended to be lower (approximately 5 mmHg) when measured with the MTM, compared with the PM method, but there was a significant and nearly linear correlation between the basal SO pressures obtained by both methods (r=0.98, P<0.001). SO dysfunction was diagnosed in the same five patients using both methods. Furthermore, the parameters of phasic SO motility were highly comparable when measured by MTM and PM. MTM was carried out successfully in 49 of 50 patients and only one MTM probe was used for all examinations, without malfunction. The endoscopist was able to diagnose SO dysfunction (by immediate observation of SO motility on the display) in 19 of 20 patients (when compared with the later PC analysis) and SO motility was judged correctly as normal in the remaining 29 cases. MTM was repeated in five patients with SOD 1-6 weeks after the first examination and the manometric findings were confirmed in all cases. Mild postmanometry pancreatitis was observed in only one of 49 patients (2%). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic MTM is a reliable, safe, very easy to handle, and low-cost alternative for the clinical assessment of SO motility.

Adult↗

Perendoscopic manometry of the distal ileum and ileocecal junction: technique, normal patterns, and comparison with transileostomy manometry.

The technique of perendoscopic manometry was used to study the motor patterns of the ileocecal junction and distal ileum. An expert endoscopist cannulated the distal ileum of 20 unsedated subjects in 260 +/- 252 (mean +/- SD) seconds, causing no discomfort beyond that of an ordinary colonoscopic examination. No sphincter-like motor activity was detected at the ileocecal junction, and four distinct motility patterns were identified in the distal ileum: (1) tone variations, (2) slow phasic contractions, (3) regular rapid phasic contractions, and (4) prolonged rapid phasic contractions. Previous appendectomy and insertion of the colonoscope into the distal ileum to position the manometric catheter did not affect the manometric recordings. Perendoscopic manometry of the distal ileum was compared with transileostomy manometry in 9 subjects. Perendoscopic and transileostomy manometric recordings showed the same motor patterns except for a longer occurrence of tone variations with perendoscopic manometry. In conclusion, this study shows that perendoscopic manometry of the distal ileum and ileocecal junction is feasible; recorded motor patterns are not affected.

Adolescent↗

Solid-state computerized manometry improves diagnostic yield in pharyngeal dysphagia: simultaneous videoradiography and manometry in dysphagia patients with normal barium swallows.

OBJECTIVE: Dynamic barium radiology with cine- or video recording has been the most frequently used technique for assessing patients with pharyngeal dysphagia. Although the diagnostic yield of the barium swallow has been high, many patients with pharyngeal dysphagia have normal dynamic barium radiology and remain a diagnostic dilemma. Could manometry add important diagnostic information in these patients? MATERIAL AND METHODS: We examined 19 patients (12 men and 7 women, mean age 47 years, range 19-69 years) with pharyngeal dysphagia but a normal barium swallow with simultaneous videoradiography and pharyngeal manometry and compared their manometry to that found in 24 normal volunteers (11 men and 13 women, mean age 37 years, range 23-59 years). RESULTS: Comparing mean values, the patient group showed statistically significant differences from the control group for eight of 10 manometric parameters. Fourteen of 19 patients showed at least one (five patients) and in most cases multiple (nine patients) manometric abnormalities (values exceeding normal mean by +/- 2SD) which might have contributed to their dysphagia: five patients with high upper esophageal sphincter (UES) resting pressures, five with high UES residual pressures, three with weak pharyngeal contractions, three with pharyngeal "spasms," seven with prolonged contraction/relaxation times, five with reduced compliance, and seven with UES/P incoordination. CONCLUSIONS: Solid-state computerized manometry is a useful adjunct to videoradiography and can provide potentially important additional information in the diagnosis of dysphagia patients.

Adult↗

Synchronous recording and review of oesophageal manometry and video fluoroscopy using a portable manometry recorder and PC with integrated digital video acquisition.

We present the technical details of a new system for the synchronous recording and review of a combined oesophageal manometry and video fluoroscopic barium swallow examination. The system developed uses a portable manometry recorder and personal computer (PC) with an integrated digital video acquisition system. These are controlled using software to enable the real time capture of digital video and manometric data throughout the combined examination. The recorded pressure waveforms can then be synchronously displayed on a screen with the recorded digital video of the fluoroscopic barium swallow. This new tool enables both comparative measurement and detailed analysis of the relationship between visualized bolus transport and pressure measurements. It provides for a deeper understanding and improved clinical assessment of complex motility disorders over those obtained when these two modalities are applied separately. The system is easily incorporated into a clinical radiology suite and it is both user and patient friendly. It uses readily available computer hardware together with multimedia software and is a comparatively economical addition to the radiology suite with the manometry analysis available fulfilling the criteria laid down by the Clinical Associates Group of the British Society of Gastroenterology.

Esophageal Motility Disorders↗

[Significance of tube manometry in the assessment of tube function. A comparison of tube manometry results and continuous direct determination of pressure in the middle ear].

Tube manometry--also known as aspiration-deflation-test--is an often used, practicable clinical test for tube function. By comparing tube manometric results with continual measurements of the middle ear pressure, a close correlation between both test results could be demonstrated. Tube manometric tests thus permit an estimation of the tube function as well as of the probable development of the middle ear pressure. An exact classification in terms of physiologic and pathologic tube function, however, is not possible. It is clear that even a partial equalization of low-pressure values in tube manometry should be interpreted as physiologic.

Ear, Middle↗

Intraoperative manometry during laparoscopic operation for esophageal achalasia: does pneumoperitoneum affect manometry?

The effects of pneumoperitoneum on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) were evaluated during laparoscopic operation for esophageal achalasia. Intraoperative manometry was performed in three patients who underwent laparoscopic cardiomyectomy with Dor's fundoplication and five patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The LES pressure and the length of the high-pressure zone (HPZ) did not change during pneumoperitoneum in either the achalasia and the LC group. In the achalasia group the LES pressure was sufficiently decreased following completion of cardiomyectomy, and the length of the HPZ was found to be sufficiently long after completion of fundoplication. The postoperative courses of the achalasia patients were uneventful, and they have had no symptoms of achalasia or gastroesophageal reflux since the operation. Accordingly, intraoperative manometry during 12 mmHg pneumoperitoneum was considered to be available for laparoscopic surgery for esophageal achalasia.

Adult↗

Manometry of the lower esophageal sphincter: inter- and intraindividual variability of slow motorized pull-through versus station pull-through manometry.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interindividual and intraindividual variability of slow motorized pull-through lower esophageal sphincter (LES) manometry compared to standard station pull-through LES manometry to measure LES overall length, abdominal length, and pressure and to report normal values for the slow motorized pull-through method. The slow motorized pull-through had significantly smaller coefficient of variation, indicating closer agreement between different examiners in analyzing a given tracing. The correlation coefficients for each parameter in normal subjects and symptomatic patients was significantly higher when using slow motorized pull-through for both patients and normal subjects for all three parameters. The 5th percentile of normal values obtained from 41 volunteers for LES overall length, abdominal length, and pressure was 2.7 cm, 1.4 cm, 5.1 mm Hg, respectively. The results indicate that the slow motorized pull-through method is more reproducible than the standard station pull-through method both between different observers and when the same examiner measures the same tracing on two different occasions.

Adult↗

The Favre system for anorectal manometry: comparison with other manometry systems in vitro and in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: The Favre system operates with airflow in a semi-closed circuit to transmit pressure. We aimed to evaluate the Favre system in comparison with other commonly used manometry systems. METHODS: The Favre, Arndorfer, Arhan, and Synectics systems were evaluated in vitro and in 14 volunteers. RESULTS: In vitro testing showed no relevant differences for latency, precision, or retest stability. In vivo, maximum resting pressure differed among all probes (P < 0.01) except for Arhan versus Arndorfer (NS). Maximum squeeze pressures differed among all probes (P < 0.01). Decrease of resting pressure during rectoanal inhibitory reflex was similar for Favre versus Arndorfer and Arhan versus Synectics (NS). Retest stability was higher with Favre than with Arndorfer (P < 0.05) and Synectics (P < 0.05) with regard to maximum resting pressure; it was higher with Favre than with Arhan (P < 0.01) and Arndorfer (P < 0.05) with regard to maximum squeeze pressure. Favre caused less discomfort than Synectics (P < 0.05) or Arndorfer (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The Favre probe is an excellent and cost-efficient system for routine anorectal manometry.

Adult↗

[Esophageal function tests: manometry, pH monitoring, pH monitoring combined with manometry and scintigraphy].

Conventional methods for exploration of the esophagus (radiology and fibroscopy) are not sufficiently sensitive to provide a precise diagnosis of minor lesions. New techniques have been developed that enable improved evaluation of the physiopathology of gastro-esophageal reflux and other esophageal motor disorders. These include esophageal manometry, pH monitoring, the association of these two procedures, and finally scintigraphy. Manometry is the most effective method of assessing esophageal motility, and it can assist in the diagnosis of motor disorders related to reflux, of dyskinesias such as in mega-esophagus, and of collagen diseases. The most reliable method for diagnosing gastro-esophageal reflux is by means of pH monitoring. More detailed physiological and physiopathological data can be obtained by combining the two investigational methods. Scintigraphy can sometimes determine the responsibility of pulmonary disorders in the development of reflux.

Collagen Diseases↗

[Simultaneous video radiography and "solid state" intraluminal pharyngeal manometry during barium swallow; video manometry].

Recent advances in technology, including computerized analysis, have renewed interest in pharyngeal manometry. Simultaneous fluoroscopy and videography have been recommended by many authors. This article reviews the history of pharyngeal manometry and highlights some of the technical difficulties involved. We also report the current status of the simultaneous technique and summarize our own results as well as those reported by other research groups.

Barium Sulfate↗

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory versus stationary esophageal manometry in the evaluation of esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Although stationary manometry commonly reveals esophageal body motility disorders in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophageal function cannot be fully and precisely assessed during normal daily activities by this investigatory modality. AIM: To compare the results of 24-hour ambulatory manometry with those of stationary manometry and to determine the specificity and accuracy of the former to detect motility disorders in patients with GERD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 15 patients with documented GERD were included in the study. Clinical assessment, upper alimentary endoscopy and stationary manometry as well as 24-hour ambulatory manometry with concomitant 24-hour monitoring of the esophageal pH were performed in each patient. RESULTS: 24-hour ambulatory manometry revealed a significant number of dropped or interrupted esophageal contractions in patients who were found to have only complete peristalsis on stationary manometry. Furthermore, in certain patients, ambulatory manometry detected an increased incidence of dropped or interrupted contractions as compared to those recorded during stationary manometry. Ineffective contractions, suggestive of poor esophageal motility, although absent on stationary manometry, were detected in a large number of patients during a 24-hour period of recording. Also, the amplitude of esophageal contractions was clearly overestimated when evaluated by stationary manometry. CONCLUSIONS: 24-hour ambulatory esophageal manometry reveals esophageal motor abnormalities to a greater extent than those demonstrated at stationary manometry, in patients with GERD. This might be of significance in designing the treatment and predicting possible outcome.

Esophageal Motility Disorders↗

Total colonic manometry as a guide for surgical management of functional colonic obstruction: Preliminary results.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Functional colonic obstruction (pseudo-obstruction) encompasses a broad group of motility disorders. Medical management of colonic pseudo-obstruction is complex and often fails, leading to surgical referral. In most cases (excepting Hirschsprung's disease) the surgeon is unable to precisely localize the area of functional obstruction. Total colonic manometry can directly measure intraluminal pressures and contractile function along the entire length of the colon. The authors propose that total colonic manometry can be used by the pediatric surgeon to guide the timing and extent of surgical therapy in refractory functional colonic obstruction. METHODS: Four patients were evaluated for functional colonic obstruction. All underwent barium enema and rectal biopsy with a diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease in one patient. All patients underwent colonoscopy and total colonic manometry. Manometric tracings were obtained while fasting, after feeding, and after pharmacologic stimulation both preoperatively (n = 4) and postoperatively (n = 3). RESULTS: Total colonic manometry identified an abrupt end of normal peristalsis in 2 of the non-Hirschsprung's patients (one in the proximal colon and one in the transverse colon). Medical therapy failed in both of these patients, and they underwent diverting ostomy proximal to the loss of normal peristalsis. The third non-Hirschsprung's patient essentially had normal manometry and was able to have her colon decompressed successfully on a laxative regimen. Repeat manometry after colonic decompression showed return of normal peristalsis in 2 of these patients and continued abnormal peristaltic activity in the third. Definitive surgical intervention based on the results of total colonic manometry was performed on the latter. All 3 patients achieved normal continence. A fourth patient had Hirschsprung's disease confirmed by rectal biopsy and underwent a 1-stage neonatal modified Duhamel procedure, which was complicated by postoperative functional obstruction. Manometry showed a lack of peristaltic function beginning in the right colon. An ileostomy was performed, and timing of ileostomy closure was guided by the return of normal colonic peristalsis seen on manometry. CONCLUSIONS: These initial cases show the utility of total colonic manometry in the management of colonic pseudo-obstruction syndromes. In addition to its diagnostic utility, direct measurement of colonic motor activity can be valuable in deciding the need for and timing of diversion, the extent of resection, and the suitability of the patient for restoring bowel continuity. In Hirschsprung's disease, total colonic manometry can potentially be used to determine suitability for primary neonatal pull-through versus a staged approach. J Pediatr Surg 36:1757-1763.

Barium Sulfate↗

The barium enema in constipation: comparison with rectal manometry and biopsy to exclude Hirschsprung's disease after the neonatal period.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease is usually made in neonates but often considered in older infants and children with constipation: these children may be referred for barium enema. Since it is widely accepted that a normal barium enema does not exclude Hirschsprung's disease, some children, after a normal enema, undergo more invasive procedures such as rectal manometry or biopsy. Our study asked how frequently a diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease was made by biopsy or manometry in children who had normal barium enema. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records and barium enemas of 54 patients older than 28 days with constipation or difficulty passing stool who had a barium enema followed by manometry and/or biopsy. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients had normal enemas: 24 of those patients had biopsies, 16 had manometry, and 8 both manometry and biopsy. Only 1 had manometry suggestive of Hirschsprung's disease, confirmed by biopsy. Six patients had abnormal enemas. Five had biopsy and manometry compatible with Hirschsprung's disease; one had a normal biopsy and manometry study. CONCLUSION: The barium enema is a good initial screening test for Hirschsprung's disease in severely constipated children since it correlates well with manometry and biopsy. The enema is particularly useful in centers without easy access to pediatric gastroenterology services, and a normal enema in this setting allows the continuation of medical therapy with further evaluation only if there is a lack of response. An abnormal enema, however, requires referral to a facility equipped to perform confirmatory manometry or biopsy.

Adolescent↗