Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Lysostaphin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Efficient adsorption of lysostaphin on bacterial cells of lysostaphin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus mutant.

A simple and efficient method for the purification of staphylolytic endopeptidase (lysostaphin) contained in culture supernatant of Staphylococcus simulans biovar staphylolyticus strain by adsorption of the enzyme on bacterial cells of lysostaphin-resistant S. aureus mutant was successfully devised. Lysostaphin was sufficiently absorbed on the heat-killed mutant cells derived from S. aureus Cowan I and efficiently eluted by 3 M KSCN. Enzyme preparation obtained by a single procedure of the affinity purification was pure enough for practical use. The yield of the enzyme was 25 mg from 1 liter culture and recovery rate was 64%.

Adsorption↗

Expression of the genes for lysostaphin and lysostaphin resistance in streptococci.

To determine if the genes for lysostaphin endopeptidase (end) and lysostaphin resistance (epr) function in streptococci, we transferred these genes from Staphylococcus simulans biovar staphylolyticus into two strains of Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus. The end-containing streptococci were able to produce and process proendopeptidase. Strains containing epr were more resistant to lysis by the streptococcolytic enzyme zoocin A and amino acid analysis of the peptidoglycans of the epr-containing streptococci revealed insertion of serines in their cross bridges. This is the first report of the transfer of a femABX-like immunity factor resulting in a physiologically useful effect in a different genus.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Mechanism and suppression of lysostaphin resistance in oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

The potential for the development of resistance in oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ORSA) to lysostaphin, a glycylglycine endopeptidase produced by Staphylococcus simulans biovar staphylolyticus, was examined in vitro and in an in vivo model of infection. Following in vitro exposure of ORSA to subinhibitory concentrations of lysostaphin, lysostaphin-resistant mutants were idenitifed among all isolates examined. Resistance to lysostaphin was associated with a loss of resistance to beta-lactams and a change in the muropeptide interpeptide cross bridge from pentaglycine to a single glycine. Mutations in femA, the gene required for incorporation of the second and third glycines into the cross bridge, were found following PCR amplification and nucleotide sequence analysis. Complementation of lysostaphin-resistant mutants with pBBB31, which encodes femA, restored the phenotype of oxacillin resistance and lysostaphin susceptibility. Addition of beta-lactam antibiotics to lysostaphin in vitro prevented the development of lysostaphin-resistant mutants. In the rabbit model of experimental endocarditis, administration of a low dose of lysostaphin for 3 days led predictably to the appearance of lysostaphin-resistant ORSA mutants in vegetations. Coadministration of nafcillin with lysostaphin prevented the emergence of lysostaphin-resistant mutants and led to a mean reduction in aortic valve vegetation counts of 7.5 log(10) CFU/g compared to those for untreated controls and eliminated the isolation of lysostaphin-resistant mutants from aortic valve vegetations. Treatment with nafcillin and lysostaphin given alone led to mean reductions of 1.35 and 1.65 log(10) CFU/g respectively. In ORSA, resistance to lysostaphin was associated with mutations in femA, but resistance could be suppressed by the coadministration of beta-lactam antibiotics.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Comparison of four methods for determining lysostaphin susceptibility of various strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Lysostaphin is an endopeptidase that cleaves the pentaglycine cross-bridges of the staphylococcal cell wall rapidly lysing the bacteria. Recently, lysostaphin has been examined for its potential to treat infections and to clear Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization, requiring a reliable method for determining the lysostaphin susceptibility of strains of S. aureus. We compared four methods for determining the lysostaphin susceptibility of 57 strains of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, vancomycin intermediately susceptible S. aureus (VISA), mupirocin-resistant S. aureus, and various defined genetic mutants of S. aureus. Three reference lysostaphin-resistant S. aureus variants were also included in the assays as negative controls. The assays examined included turbidity, MIC, minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), and disk diffusion assays. All of the strains of S. aureus tested, including a VISA strain which had previously been reported to be lysostaphin resistant, were susceptible to lysostaphin by all four methods. The three reference lysostaphin-resistant variants were resistant by all four methods. The disk diffusion assay was the simplest method to differentiate lysostaphin-susceptible S. aureus strains from lysostaphin-resistant variants, while the MBC assay could be used as a follow-up assay if required. In the disk diffusion assay, all strains of S. aureus tested revealed zones of inhibition of >/=11 mm using a 50-microg lysostaphin disk, while the three reference lysostaphin-resistant S. aureus variants had no zones of inhibition. In MBC assays, concentrations of lysostaphin ranging from 0.16 microg/ml to 2.5 microg/ml were found to cause a 3 log or greater drop from the initial CFU of S. aureus within 30 min for all strains tested.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Immunity to lysostaphin and its therapeutic value for ocular MRSA infections in the rabbit.

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of immunization against lysostaphin on the bactericidal action of lysostaphin in ocular tissue and the possible induction of allergic reactions. METHODS: Rabbits were immunized against lysostaphin by subcutaneous, intranasal, or topical routes. Anti-lysostaphin antibody titers were determined by ELISA and by neutralization of lysostaphin. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was intrastromally or intravitreously injected into rabbit eyes. Eyes were treated either topically with drops of lysostaphin (0.3%) or with a single intravitreous injection (0.1 mL) of lysostaphin (0.1%). At the time of death, corneas or vitreous humors were cultured to determine the number of colony forming units (CFU). RESULTS: Rabbits in keratitis experiments that were immunized subcutaneously, intranasally, or topically had serum antibody titers of 10,240, 187, and 1,867, respectively, and neutralization titers of 8 or less. In both normal and immunized rabbits with keratitis, lysostaphin significantly reduced the log CFU to less than 1 log, whereas the untreated eyes contained more than 10(6) CFU/cornea (P < or = 0.0001). Rabbits that were subcutaneously or topically immunized for endophthalmitis experiments had serum antibody titers of 1636 or 137, respectively, and neutralization titers of 2 or less. A single intravitreous injection of lysostaphin (0.1%) sterilized all eyes of immunized and nonimmune rabbits with endophthalmitis. No adverse effects were observed with the administration of lysostaphin to either normal or immunized rabbit eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Lysostaphin treatment of immunized rabbits was effective in treating S. aureus-infected eyes, despite the presence of anti-lysostaphin antibody. No adverse reactions were produced by administration of lysostaphin to immunized rabbits.

Animals↗

Improved pharmacokinetics and reduced antibody reactivity of lysostaphin conjugated to polyethylene glycol.

Lysostaphin is a 27-kDa endopeptidase that enzymatically disrupts the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus and is a promising candidate for treating S. aureus blood-borne infections. It would be extremely useful to define conditions that would both increase lysostaphin's in vivo half-life to allow for more effective tissue distribution and reduce its immunogenicity. Conjugation of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to lysostaphin (PEGylation) was investigated as a means to accomplish these goals. Rather than using linear forms of PEG, branched PEGs were chosen as the initial candidates because their large spatial volumes prevent entry of the polymer into the enzyme's active sites, which could potentially reduce enzymatic function. Enzymatic activity for most PEGylated lysostaphins was reduced, but these compounds were still considerably active compared to unconjugated lysostaphin, with conjugates that had lower degrees of PEG modification having greater activity than those with higher degrees. PEGylated lysostaphin injected intravenously had a serum drug half-life of up to 24 h and resulted in much higher plasma drug concentrations than an equal dose of unconjugated lysostaphin, which had a half-life of less than 1 h. Finally, reduced binding affinity was shown for PEGylated lysostaphin in an antilysostaphin capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, with some PEG-lysostaphin conjugates having binding affinities that were reduced more than 10-fold compared to unconjugated lysostaphin. These findings demonstrate that PEGylation of lysostaphin, while diminishing its S. aureus killing activity, results in prolonged serum drug persistence and reduced antibody binding. These features should significantly enhance lysostaphin's therapeutic value as an intravenous "antibiotic" against S. aureus.

Animals↗

Lysostaphin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis in the rabbit.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of lysostaphin treatment of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis in a rabbit model. METHODS: The sensitivity to lysostaphin and vancomycin were compared for 34 MRSA and 12 methicillin-sensitive strains. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain 301 (MRSA 301) or a methicillin-sensitive strain of low virulence, ISP546, was intrastromally injected into rabbit corneas. Rabbit eyes were treated topically every 30 minutes from 4 to 9 or 10 to 15 hours postinfection with 0.28% lysostaphin or 5.0% vancomycin. Rabbits were killed and corneas were excised and cultured to determine the number of colony forming units (CFU) per cornea. RESULTS: Ninety percent minimal inhibitory concentrations were at least 19-fold lower for lysostaphin than for vancomycin. With early therapy (4 -9 hours postinfection) lysostaphin sterilized all MRSA 301-infected corneas, whereas untreated corneas contained 6.52 log CFU/cornea (P < or = 0.0001). Corneas infected with MRSA 301 and treated similarly with vancomycin retained 2.3 +/-0.85 log CFU/cornea, and none were sterile. When therapy was begun later (10-15 hours postinfection) the residual bacteria in lysostaphin-treated eyes were significantly less numerous than in vancomycin-treated eyes (0.58 +/- 0.34 vs. 5.83 +/- 0.16 log CFU/cornea, respectively; P < or = 0.0001). Three experiments were performed to demonstrate that lysostaphin penetrated the cornea to kill bacteria in vivo; lysostaphin-treated eyes were found to recover from infection, bacteria that did not cause epithelial defects (ISP546) were susceptible to lysostaphin, and inhibition of lysostaphin when harvesting corneas did not alter the observed therapeutic values of lysostaphin. CONCLUSIONS: Lysostaphin is very effective in treating keratitis mediated by methicillin-sensitive or methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Animals↗

Binding and degradation of elastin by the staphylolytic enzyme lysostaphin.

Lysostaphin is a bacterial zinc metalloproteinase that degrades staphylococcal cell wall peptidoglycans. We have shown that lysostaphin also binds tightly to elastin and contains elastolytic activity. The objective of this investigation was to further characterize the biochemical mechanism of elastolysis by lysostaphin. Binding of lysostaphin to elastin was demonstrated with elastin peptide affinity chromatography. Elastolysis by lysostaphin was studied using a tritium release assay with tritium borohydride-reduced elastin as substrate. Proteolysis of elastin by lysostaphin was maximal at neutral to slightly basic pH and proceeded linearly for 10 hr before reaching saturation. The elastolytic activity was not affected by inhibitors of cysteine or serine proteinases, but was inhibited by o-phenanthroline, EDTA, and by the addition of exogenous zinc. Inhibition by zinc was not due to an alteration in enzyme-ligand interaction since zinc-containing buffers did not impair the ability of lysostaphin to bind elastin. Lysostaphin elastolysis was not inhibited by trypsin treatment of the enzyme, which has been shown to inactivate the enzyme's staphylolytic properties. It is therefore concluded that: (1) lysostaphin binds and degrades elastin; (2) the elastolytic activity of lysostaphin is distinct from its staphylolytic activity; (3) sequence similarities with matrix metalloproteinases suggest the Ala-Ala-Thr-His-Glu sequence in the amino terminus of lysostaphin to be involved in elastin degradation; (4) our studies are important in establishing that metalloproteinases from staphylococci can participate in elastin degradation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

High-level potentiation of lysostaphin anti-staphylococcal activity by lysozyme.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether lysostaphin would enhance its anti-staphylococcal efficacy in combination with lysozyme. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of lysostaphin and lysozyme were separately determined for 41 strains belonging to 10 different species of human staphylococci. Lysozyme was virtually inactive and showed MICs of 15 mg/ml. On the contrary, all strains were susceptible to lysostaphin and showed MICs ranging from 2.5 to 60 micrograms/ml for the different Staphylococcus species. When the MIC of lysostaphin was determined in media containing submultiples of the MIC of lysozyme, the values obtained were much lower. The reduction of the lysostaphin MIC ranged from 16- to 200-fold in the different species tested. In Staphylococcus aureus, in particular, the combination of lysostaphin with 1.5 mg of lysozyme per ml reduced the MIC of lysostaphin by 25-fold. The activities of two combinations of the two enzymes were evaluated: one combination was expected to be active on S. aureus only, and the other combination was expected to inhibit all Staphylococcus strains. The first combination (0.5 micrograms of lysostaphin plus 0.5 mg of lysozyme per ml) was inhibitory to all of the 84 S. aureus strains tested, whereas 137 of 151 strains of other Staphylococcus species were unaffected. On the contrary, all of the 235 Staphylococcus strains tested were inhibited by the second combination (4 micrograms of lysostaphin plus 5 mg of lysozyme per ml). The possible mechanisms of lysostaphin potentiation by lysozyme are considered, and the potential use of a lysostaphin-lysozyme combination for topical therapy of staphylococcal infections resistant to other antibiotics is discussed.

Drug Synergism↗

Studies on prolysostaphin processing and characterization of the lysostaphin immunity factor (Lif) of Staphylococcus simulans biovar staphylolyticus.

Lysostaphin is an extracellular glycylglycine endopeptidase produced by Staphylococcus simulans biovar staphylolyticus ATCC1362 that lyses staphylococcal cells by hydrolysing the polyglycine interpeptide bridges of the peptidoglycan. Renewed analysis of the sequence of the lysostaphin gene (lss), and the sequencing of the amino-terminus of purified prolysostaphin and of mature lysostaphin revealed that lysostaphin is organized as a preproprotein of 493 amino acids (aa), with a signal peptide consisting of 36 aa, a propeptide of 211 aa from which 195 aa are organized in 15 tandem repeats of 13 aa length, and a mature protein of 246 aa. Prolysostaphin is processed in the culture supernatant of S. simulans biovar staphylolyticus by an extracellular cysteine protease. Although prolysostaphin was staphylolytically active, the mature lysostaphin was about 4.5-fold more active. The controlled expression in Staphylococcus carnosus of lss and lss with deletions in the prepropeptide region indicated that the tandem repeats of the propeptide are not necessary for protein export or activation of Lss, but keep Lss in a less active state. Intracellularly expressed pro- and mature lysostaphin exert staphylolytic activity in cell-free extracts, but do not affect growth of the corresponding clones. We characterized a lysostaphin immunity factor gene (lif) which is located in the opposite direction to lss. The expression of lif in S. carnosus led to an increase in the serine/glycine ratio of the interpeptide bridges of peptidoglycan from 2 to 35%, suggesting that lysostaphin immunity depends on serine incorporation into the interpeptide bridge. If, in addition to lif, lss is co-expressed the serine/glycine ratio is further increased to 58%, suggesting that Lss selects for optimal serine incorporation. Lif shows similarity to FemA and FemB proteins, which are involved in the biosynthesis of the glycine interpeptide bridge of staphylococcal peptidoglycan. In contrast to that of Lif, the production of FemA and FemB in S. carnosus does not cause lysostaphin immunity. The putative tRNASer gene located downstream of lss had no recognizable influence on lysostaphin immunity. lss and lif are flanked by insertion sequences, suggesting that S. simulans biovar staphylolyticus received lif and lss by horizontal gene transfer.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Lysostaphin-resistant variants of Staphylococcus aureus demonstrate reduced fitness in vitro and in vivo.

Lysostaphin is under development as a therapy for serious staphylococcal infections. During preclinical development, lysostaphin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus variants have occasionally been reported in vitro and in vivo. The acquisition of resistance to this drug, however, leads to a significant increase in beta-lactam antibiotic susceptibility, rendering methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains functionally methicillin susceptible. In this study, we have demonstrated that the development of lysostaphin resistance by two strains of MRSA also led to a loss of fitness in the variants. Consistent with the mutations found in previously reported lysostaphin-resistant S. aureus variants, these two variants had mutations in their femA genes, resulting in nonfunctional FemA proteins and, thus, monoglycine cross bridges in the peptidoglycan. The diminished fitness of the lysostaphin-resistant variants was reflected by (i) a reduced logarithmic growth rate, with the variants being outcompeted in cocultures by their wild-type parental strains; (ii) increased susceptibility to elevated temperatures; and (iii) at least fivefold less virulence of the lysostaphin-resistant variants than their wild-type strains in a mouse kidney infection model, with the lysostaphin-resistant variants being outcompeted in coinfections with their wild-type parental strains. During a 14-day serial passage without selective pressure, the lysostaphin-resistant variants failed to develop compensatory mutations which restored their fitness. These results suggest that should lysostaphin resistance due to an alteration in the FemA function emerge in S. aureus during therapy with lysostaphin, the resistant variants would be less fit and less virulent, and, in addition, infections with these strains would be easily treatable with beta-lactam antibiotics.

Animals↗

Adenoviral-mediated transfer of a lysostaphin gene into the goat mammary gland.

As a step toward preventing and curing Staphylococcus aureus mastitis, an adenoviral-mediated gene transfer technique was used to enable mammary cells to synthesize and secrete lysostaphin, an anti-staphylococcal protein. A lysostaphin gene, modified for eukaryotic expression of the bioactive variant, Gln125,232-lysostaphin, was inserted into a replication deficient adenovirus by homologous recombination in 293 cells. The resulting adenoviral vector containing the modified lysostaphin gene (Ad-lys) was used to infect bovine mammary epithelial cells in vitro and caprine mammary cells in vivo. A similar adenoviral vector containing the Escherichia coli gene encoding beta-galactosidase (Ad-lacZ) was also evaluated. Transduction of cultured bovine cells by Ad-lacZ was confirmed by the presence of beta-galactosidase in fixed cells 48 h postinfection. Bovine cells transduced by Ad-lys secreted immunoreactive Gln125,232-lysostaphin (0.8 microg/ml) into media that had approximately 20% bioactivity compared with native lysostaphin. To evaluate transduction in vivo, udder halves of four nonlactating goats were exposed to 10(10) plaque-forming units (pfu) ofAd-lacZ by two intramammary infusions given 48 h apart. The animals were euthanized 24 h later, and extensive expression of beta-galactosidase was detected in cells lining the teat canals, with more moderate expression observed in adjoining mammary parenchyma. Udder halves of two other nonlactating goats were infused with 10(10) pfu of Ad-lys while contralateral udder halves received Ad-lacZ. The animals were euthanized 48 h postinfusion. In both animals, extensive expression of beta-galactosidase was detected in Ad-lacZ exposed teats. Immunoreative Gln125,232-lysostaphin was detectable in secretions from Ad-lys exposed glands 24 h postinfusion, increasing to approximately 1 microg/ml at 48 h postinfusion. As with cultured bovine mammary epithelial cells, the bioactivity of goat-derived Gln125,232-lysostaphin was approximately 20% of native lysostaphin. These results demonstrate that an adenoviral vector can be used to introduce a gene into the ruminant mammary gland, enabling the secretion of a bioactive form of lysostaphin.

Adenoviridae↗

Combinations of lysostaphin with beta-lactams are synergistic against oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is rapidly killed by the endopeptidase lysostaphin, and the addition of beta-lactam antibiotics provides synergistic killing. We investigated the possibility that beta-lactams given in combination with lysostaphin would improve the activity of lysostaphin against oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (ORSE), which is normally less susceptible to lysostaphin. Checkerboard synergy testing was performed for lysostaphin given in combination with oxacillin against 10 ORSE isolates for which the lysostaphin MICs were > o r= 8 microg/ml. The fractional inhibitory concentration index ranged from 0.0234 to 0.2656, indicating synergy, which was confirmed in growth curve experiments. In the rabbit model of experimental aortic valve endocarditis using an ORSE strain, the combination of lysostaphin and nafcillin was as effective as vancomycin alone and significantly better than lysostaphin or nafcillin alone. We conclude that beta-lactam antibiotics given in combination with lysostaphin are synergistic against many strains of ORSE.

Animals↗

Persistency of adenoviral-mediated lysostaphin expression in goat mammary glands.

Gene therapy has great potential to enable synthesis of protein molecules in targeted cells of an animal. One application may be the production of antibacterial enzymes by the mammary gland as a means of preventing or treating mastitis. We have previously demonstrated that goat mammary cells are capable of producing lysostaphin, an antistaphylococcal enzyme, after being transduced in vivo with a recombinant adenoviral vector containing a modified lysostaphin gene (Ad-lys). The current study examined duration of expression, and antibody response to lysostaphin and the adenoviral vector. Following intramammary infusion into nonlactating goats (n = 4), recovery of transducible adenoviral vector in mammary secretions persisted for 11 d. Transducible vector was not detected in serum, saliva, urine, or feces. Peak lysostaphin concentrations (< 20 microg/mL) in mammary secretions of infused udders were detected approximately 1 wk postinfusion, and generally returned to undetectable levels after an additional 1 to 2 wk. The poor persistency of expression was likely due to the very potent immune response to both the adenovirus and the expressed lysostaphin. Serum IgG antibodies recognizing the adenoviral vector developed within 7 d of the infusion, and titers rose dramatically to greater than 1:1 x 10(5). Similar titers of serum IgG antibodies to lysostaphin developed in 3 goats, with more moderate titers in the fourth goat. The antibody response to lysostaphin was delayed by approximately 4 d in comparison to the response to the adenovirus. Serum IgG antibody profiles were reflected in mammary secretions. No IgA antibodies to adenovirus or lysostaphin were detected in sera or mammary secretion. We demonstrate that while the lysostaphin gene can be introduced to the mammary gland using an adenoviral-mediated gene transfer technique, the strong immune response that it provokes makes the approach unsuitable for combating mastitis.

Adenoviridae↗

Antimicrobial activity of lysostaphin and a Listeria monocytogenes bacteriophage endolysin produced and secreted by lactic acid bacteria.

The expression and secretion signals of the Sep protein from Lactobacillus fermentum BR11 were used to direct export of two peptidoglycan hydrolases by Lb. fermentum BR11, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 14917 and Lactococcus lactis MG1363. The production levels, hydrolytic and bacteriocidal activities of the Listeria monocytogenes bacteriophage N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase endolysin Ply511 and the glycylglycine endopeptidase lysostaphin were examined. Buffering of the growth media to a neutral pH allowed detection of Ply511 and lysostaphin peptidoglycan hydrolytic activity from all lactic acid bacteria. It was found that purified Ply511 has a pH activity range similar to that of lysostaphin with both enzymes functioning optimally under alkaline conditions. Supernatants from lactobacilli expressing lysostaphin reduced viability of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by approximately 8 log(10) CFU/ml compared to controls. However, supernatants containing Ply511 were unable to control L. monocytogenes growth. In coculture experiments, both Lb. plantarum and Lb. fermentum synthesizing lysostaphin were able to effectively reduce MRSA cell numbers by >7.4 and 1.7 log(10)CFU/ml, respectively, while lactic acid bacteria secreting Ply511 were unable to significantly inhibit the growth of L. monocytogenes. Our results demonstrate that lysostaphin and Ply511 can be expressed in an active form from different lactic acid bacteria and lysostaphin showed superior killing activity. Lactobacilli producing lysostaphin may have potential for in situ biopreservation in foodstuffs or for prevention of S. aureus infections.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Lysostaphin is effective in treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis in the rabbit.

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of lysostaphin treatment of experimental endophthalmitis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). METHODS: In one experiment, rabbits were injected in the mid-vitreous with 50 or 200 CFU of S. aureus; untreated groups and groups injected intra-vitreally at 8 or 24 hours postinfection with vehicle or lysostaphin (0.1 mg/ml) were compared in terms of CFU/ml vitreous at 24 or 48 hours postinfection. Histopathology of untreated and treated eyes was also compared. To quantify the potency of lysostaphin, additional rabbits were injected with 50 CFU of S. aureus and untreated eyes and eyes treated at 8 hours with 0.001, 0.01 or 0.05 mg/ml were compared in terms of CFU/ml vitreous at 24 hours postinfection. RESULTS: Vitreous of untreated eyes or vehicle-treated eyes injected with 50 or 200 CFU of S. aureus contained 5-10 million CFU/ml at 24 or 48 hours postinfection. All eyes treated with lysostaphin at 8 hours postinfection had less than 1 log CFU/ml in the vitreous (P >or= 0.0001). Similarly, eyes treated with lysostaphin at 24 hours postinfection had approximately 1 log of CFU/ml at 48 hours postinfection. None of the untreated eyes were sterile and 88% or 50% of the eyes treated at 8 or 24 hours postinfection, respectively, were sterile. Eyes treated with lysostaphin at 8, but not 24, hours postinfection had less pronounced pathologic changes than the untreated eyes (P = 0.002). A significant reduction in the CFU/ml vitreous at 24 hours postinfection was obtained by treating infected eyes at 8 hours postinfection with lysostaphin at concentrations of >or=0.001 mg/ml (P <or= 0.0034). CONCLUSIONS: Lysostaphin is effective in treating experimental endophthalmitis mediated by MRSA.

Animals↗