SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Lupus”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Association of galectin-3 in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune condition showing persistent profiling of inflammation and damage of organs and immune system. Amongst many biomarkers for such autoimmune diseases, Galectin-3 (Gal-3) a β-galactoside-binding lectin responsible for regulation, inflammation, and fibrosis of immune repsonses, has engrossed researchers for further investigations as a potential biomarker. However, correlation has been studied between circulating Galectin-3 levels and SLE but outcomes still remain inconsistent. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the association between circulating galectin-3 levels and SLE.Materials and MethodsPubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Embase databases are extensively used for literature search. The last database search was conducted on September 6, 2025. Eligible studies included case control studies reporting circulating galectin-3 levels in individuals with SLE and healthy controls. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software was used for statistical analysis. Pooled effect sizes were calculated as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics, and publication bias was evaluated using Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression analysis.ResultsSeven eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that patients with SLE had significantly higher circulating Galectin-3 levels than healthy controls (mean difference = 8.48; 95% CI: 3.84-13.12; p < 0.0001). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (Tau square: 32.57, Q = 196.03; p < 0.0001, I2 = 96.93%). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the overall findings. Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression analysis indicated no publication bias among studies. Subgroup analysis supports the results of the overall analysis.ConclusionThis meta-analysis depicts that galectin-3 may serve as a biomarker associated with SLE pathogenesis and inflammatory activity due to significantly elevated levels of circulating galectin-3 levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Stigma, discrimination-related events, and determinants among adult people living with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): Systematic review and indicator-level meta-analysis.

BackgroundSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with 0.4 million new cases diagnosed annually. With its wide variety of visible and invisible manifestations, people living with SLE report being exposed to stigmatization, which impacts their personal and professional lives. However, the current literature is unclear on whether healthcare management teams assess this concern during follow-up. This study aims to synthesize existing evidence on the prevalence and determinants of stigma among people living with SLE.MethodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis gathered evidence from observational studies identified from three databases on 16 July 2025. Dual independent screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment (using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) were performed. Results were synthesized using descriptive statistics, narrative synthesis, and indicator-level meta-analyses.ResultsWithin the past two decades, 11 studies comprising 2254 people living with SLE reported and measured stigma- and discrimination-related events using various scales. Stigma was found to be prevalent across its three constructs: interpersonal, perceived, and intrapersonal stigma. This review demonstrated that people living with SLE reported a moderate overall burden of stigma (34.71 [95% CI 26.15, 43.27]), with average stigma scores indicating psychological impact. Additionally, nearly one in two persons (46% [95% CI 28-66%]) experienced at least one form of stigma or discrimination, most commonly social isolation and unfair treatment. Mental health associations were correlated with higher stigma burden.ConclusionThis review demonstrates that stigma and discrimination are not just social challenges but also critical determinants of health. With cautious interpretation, pooled evidence reveals a consistent high prevalence of stigma and discrimination, which act as "toxic" stressors, creating a vicious cycle with psychological stress and psychiatric manifestations and disease activity. There is an urgent clinical need to move beyond a mere biological approach to disease assessment and management and to begin screening for the "invisible" burden of invalidation and discrimination.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

From human papillomavirus (HPV) infection to HPV-associated cancers in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The current cervix-focused screening paradigm in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may underestimate extra-cervical anogenital cancer risk. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the risk of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and HPV-associated cancers in SLE patients. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed (2010), Embase (2010), and Cochrane Library (2010) to August 8, 2025. Odds Ratios (ORs) and Standardized Incidence Ratios (SIRs) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were calculated. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251122192). RESULTS: SLE was associated with significantly increased odds of HPV infection (OR = 4.12, 95% CI 2.03, 8.32). We further assessed the risk of HPV-associated malignancies in SLE patients. SLE patients exhibited substantially elevated risks across multiple HPV-associated cancers (SIR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.51, 2.38). The risk of cervical cancer was more than doubled (SIR = 2.25, 95% CI 1.75, 2.89). Notably, even higher risks were observed for extra-cervical anogenital cancers, namely vulvar/vaginal cancers (SIR = 5.60, 95% CI 3.71, 8.43). CONCLUSIONS: SLE is associated with elevated risks of HPV infection and a broad spectrum of HPV-associated cancers. Subgroup analyses suggested that cyclophosphamide use, multiple sexual partners, and Asian populations may constitute higher-risk subgroups. These findings highlight the need for additional prospective evidence to better characterize HPV-associated cancer risks in SLE patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Altered reproductive hormone profiles in systemic lupus erythematosus - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) shows a marked female predominance during reproductive years, possibly suggesting hormonal factors in its pathogenesis. However, evidence regarding reproductive hormone alterations in SLE remains inconsistent. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review studies assessing reproductive hormone levels in adult SLE patients compared with healthy controls and across disease activity states. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines and a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO CRD42024544730), PubMed and Scopus were searched (May 2024). Eligible observational studies reported estradiol, testosterone, progesterone, prolactin, FSH, LH, DHEA-S, DHEA or androstenedione in SLE patients versus controls or by disease activity. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Eighty-three studies were included (5389 individuals for SLE vs. controls; 2067 for active vs. inactive SLE). Prolactin was consistently higher in SLE (MD 8.07 ng/mL; 95% CI 4.69-11.45; p < 0.001) and even more during flare (MD 5.83 ng/mL; 95% CI 3.88-7.78; p < 0.001). Estradiol showed non-significant overall elevations but was significantly higher in women with active disease (MD 8.55 pg/mL; 95% CI 1.37-15.73; p = 0.03). DHEA-S was found to be significantly lower in SLE (MD -1.00 μg/mL; 95% CI -1.5 to -0.50; p = 0.002) but too few studies evaluated its dynamics during flares. FSH and LH were significantly higher in men with SLE. Other hormones were inconsistent. Only three small heterogeneous studies evaluated hormonal changes during flares. CONCLUSIONS: Prolactin excess and androgen deficiency are consistent features of SLE, particularly in women, while elevated gonadotropins are mainly seen in men. Estradiol is higher during active disease but other data are inconsistent. Longitudinal studies are limited, with prolactin the only hormone consistently linked to disease activity and full hormonal profiles during flares are largely unstudied.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Variants in the interferon regulatory factor 5 gene confer genetic risk for systemic lupus erythematosus in a Han Chinese population.

BACKGROUND: Interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5), integral to interferon signaling pathways, has been identified as a susceptibility locus for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Nevertheless, the relationship between IRF5 variants and SLE risk within the Han Chinese demographic remains inadequately characterized. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Genotyping of two functional single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in IRF5 was conducted in 167 individuals with SLE and 246 healthy controls utilizing sequence-specific primer polymerase chain reaction (PCR-SSP). Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were employed to assess associations. RESULTS: The rs10954213 variant demonstrated a significant association with SLE susceptibility under the recessive model (GG vs. AG+AA, OR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.30-3.75, p = 0.003, adjusted p [pc] = 0.030) and homozygous model (GG vs. AA, OR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.36-4.42, p = 0.003, pc = 0.032). Similarly, the rs2004640 variant was associated with an increased risk of SLE across allelic (T vs. G, OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.22-2.26, p = 0.001, pc = 0.011), dominant (TG+TT vs. GG, OR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.19-2.63, p = 0.005, pc = 0.047), and homozygous models (TT vs. GG, OR = 3.72, 95% CI: 1.58-8.78, p = 0.002, pc = 0.016). Haplotype analysis identified protective haplotype HT1 (A/G, OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.41-0.73, p < 0.001) and risk haplotype HT4 (G/T, OR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.42-4.42, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that IRF5 gene variants substantially modulate susceptibility to SLE in the Han Chinese population. They hold potential as biomarkers for evaluating SLE risk and offer valuable perspectives into disease pathogenesis.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Longitudinal comparison of treat-to-target states and clinical outcomes in patients with late-onset versus early-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: We compared demographic and clinical characteristics between patients with late-onset (LO) and early-onset (EO) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and examined their longitudinal associations with treatment targets and long-term outcomes, irreversible organ damage accrual and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: We analyzed prospectively collected data from patients enrolled in the Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration cohort. Patients diagnosed with SLE at age >50 years were classified as LO-SLE and compared with those diagnosed at age ≤50 years (EO-SLE). Longitudinal associations with treatment targets (LLDAS and DORIS remission), organ damage accrual (SLICC/ACR Damage Index), and HRQoL (SF36v2 physical and mental component summary (PCS and MCS) scores) were examined using multivariable multilevel logistic, recurrent-event survival, and linear mixed-effects models, respectively. Disease activity, flares, medication exposure, and other clinical characteristics were also compared between groups. RESULTS: Among 3,917 patients studied, 346 (8.8%) had LO-SLE. Compared with EO-SLE, patients with LO-SLE had lower disease activity, lower glucocorticoid and immunosuppressant exposure, and higher attainment of treatment targets; LO-SLE was associated with higher odds of attaining LLDAS (OR: 2.33 (1.66, 3.28)) and DORIS remission (OR: 2.22 (1.45, 3.38)). However, they were at a greater risk of damage accrual (HR:1.82 (1.50, 2.21)) and lower PCS scores, meaning poorer physical health (regression coefficient (RC) = -3.63 (-4.58, -2.68)) but not MCS (RC= 0.68 (-.50, 1.86)). CONCLUSION: Despite higher attainment of treatment targets, patients with LO-SLE experienced greater damage accrual and poorer physical health, suggesting that disease activity targets alone may not fully capture outcome risk in LO-SLE.

Journal Article↗