Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Low Back Pain”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Screening of lower back pain, low back pain clinic. The clinical experience.

Acute low back pain is a common complaint with high prevalence in society. Orthopaedic and specialist spinal services may be overwhelmed by large numbers of patients with low back pain who do not require investigation or surgical intervention. This phenomenon has led to the establishment of back pain screening clinics as a system of triage for those with acute low back pain. In March 2001, a back pain screening clinic was established in the Adelaide and Meath Hospitals incorporating the National Children's hospital. Six hundred and sixty-five patients were seen in the first year of this clinic. Of these, only ninety-six required referral to the orthopaedic spinal clinic. Just twenty-nine of these patients required surgical intervention. The introduction of this service resulted in a reduction in the waiting periods for the specialised spine clinic. We conclude that back pain screening clinics result in a clinical and economical improvement in the care of those suffering from acute low back pain. This is achieved by the systematic and efficient assessment, treatment and referral of patients afflicted with acute low back pain.

Adult↗

Low back pain.

Low back pain is a major burden to society. Many people will experience an episode of low back pain during their life. Some people develop chronic low back pain, which can be very disabling. Low back pain is associated with high direct and indirect costs. Recent epidemiological data suggest that there is a need to revise our views regarding the course of low back pain. Low back pain is not simply either acute or chronic but fluctuates over time with frequent recurrences or exacerbations. Also, low back pain may frequently be part of a widespread pain problem instead of being isolated, regional pain. Although epidemiological studies have identified many individual, psychosocial and occupational risk factors for the onset of low back pain, their independent prognostic value is usually low. Similarly, a number of factors have now been identified that may increase the risk of chronic disability but no single factor seems to have a strong impact. Consequently, it is still unclear what the most efficient strategy is for primary and secondary prevention. In general, multi-modal preventative approaches seem better able to reflect the clinical reality than single-modal interventions.

Acute Disease↗

[Occupational aspects of low back pain].

Low back pain is a very common ailment among workers of all ages. Approximately 60-90% of the adult population suffers from low back pain at least once during their life time. The yearly incident rate of low back pain is about 1-2%. This is one of the major causes of occupational illnesses and absence from work. A high rate of low back pain is found among workers involved with heavy physical labour and also among truck drivers. Risk factors for low back pain are intense heavy labour, lifting heavy objects, protracted static positions, repetitive movements and awkward body postures accompanied by vibration. Prolonged standing and sitting are not risk factors for low back pain. Work dissatisfaction, low wages and low levels of education are possible predictors for low back pain. The only reliable predictor of future low back pain is the evidence of previous back pain as disclosed during the preemployment health examination.

Automobile Driving↗

Epidemiology of low back pain.

Low back pain is a symptom that cannot be validated by an external standard. It is a disorder with many possible etiologies, occurring in many groups of the population, and with many definitions. Low back pain is a common problem, with a prevalence in the United States ranging from 8% to 56%. It is estimated that 28% experience disabling low back pain sometime during their lives, 14% experience episodes lasting at least 2 weeks, 8% of the entire working population will be disabled in any given year, and the lifetime prevalence of low back pain is 65% to 80%. It is believed that most episodes of low back pain will be short-lived and that 80% to 90% of attacks of low back pain resolve in about 6 weeks, irrespective of the administration or type of treatment. However, multiple studies in the late 90s showed recurrent or chronic low back pain, evaluated at 3 months, 6 months, or 12 months, ranging from 35% to 79%. Risk factors of low back pain are multifactorial, with many possible etiologies. Multiple risk factors of low back pain and lower-extremity pain include physical factors, social demographic characteristics, habits, and psychosocial factors. This review will discuss the epidemiology of low back pain, with emphasis on frequency, causes, and consequences of low back pain; the influence of age, gender, morphologic characteristics, and genetics; and the influence of occupational, mechanical, social, habitual, and psychological factors.

Journal Article↗

Epidemiology and natural history of low back pain.

Low back pain is a common problem affecting most adults at some point during their lifetime. At any one time, around 1 in 5 adults will report symptoms of low back pain, rising to 40% when asked if they have experienced symptoms during the previous month. The majority of people who experience an episode of low back pain will improve over time. However a sizeable proportion experience repeated episodes or recurrences, and some report continuous symptoms for many years. A wide range of factors are linked to both the onset and persistence of low back pain. Some studies have related age and gender to low back pain, but the link overall is equivocal. Work-related factors such as heavy lifting, and socio-demographic factors such as smoking and obesity have been linked with the onset of low back pain. High levels of functional impairment and the presence of pain radiating to the leg have been cited as factors associated with a poor prognosis among primary care consulters with low back pain. Other characteristics associated with both the development and the persistence of low back pain include psychological factors such as depression and anxiety and workplace factors such as job satisfaction. Low back pain places large demands on health, social and welfare systems. Further research is needed to identify practical interventions to reduce this burden from low back pain.

Journal Article↗

Effect of Iyengar yoga therapy for chronic low back pain.

Low back pain is a significant public health problem and one of the most commonly reported reasons for the use of Complementary Alternative Medicine. A randomized control trial was conducted in subjects with non-specific chronic low back pain comparing Iyengar yoga therapy to an educational control group. Both programs were 16 weeks long. Subjects were primarily self-referred and screened by primary care physicians for study of inclusion/exclusion criteria. The primary outcome for the study was functional disability. Secondary outcomes including present pain intensity, pain medication usage, pain-related attitudes and behaviors, and spinal range of motion were measured before and after the interventions. Subjects had low back pain for 11.2+/-1.54 years and 48% used pain medication. Overall, subjects presented with less pain and lower functional disability than subjects in other published intervention studies for chronic low back pain. Of the 60 subjects enrolled, 42 (70%) completed the study. Multivariate analyses of outcomes in the categories of medical, functional, psychological and behavioral factors indicated that significant differences between groups existed in functional and medical outcomes but not for the psychological or behavioral outcomes. Univariate analyses of medical and functional outcomes revealed significant reductions in pain intensity (64%), functional disability (77%) and pain medication usage (88%) in the yoga group at the post and 3-month follow-up assessments. These preliminary data indicate that the majority of self-referred persons with mild chronic low back pain will comply to and report improvement on medical and functional pain-related outcomes from Iyengar yoga therapy.

Adult↗

Comparison of spine motion in elite golfers with and without low back pain.

Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder affecting golfers, yet little is known of the specific mechanisms responsible for this injury. The aim of this study was to compare golf swing spinal motion in three movement planes between six male professional golfers with low back pain (age 29.2+/-6.4 years; height 1.79+/-0.04 m; body mass 78.2+/-12.2 kg; mean +/- s) and six without low back pain (age 32.7+/-4.8 years; height 1.75+/-0.03 m; body mass 85.8+/-10.9 kg) using a lightweight triaxial electrogoniometer. We found that golfers with low back pain tended to flex their spines more when addressing the ball and used significantly greater left side bending on the backswing. Golfers with low back pain also had less trunk rotation(obtained from a neutral posture), which resulted in a relative 'supramaximal' rotation of their spines when swinging. Pain-free golfers demonstrated over twice as much trunk flexion velocity on the downswing, which could relate to increased abdominal muscle activity in this group. This study is the first to show distinct differences in the swing mechanics between golfers with and without low back pain and provides valuable guidance for clinicians and teachers to improve technique to facilitate recovery from golf-related low back pain.

Adult↗

Evidence-based medicine and the challenge of low back pain: where are we now?

Low back pain has long been described as a challenge for both primary care physicians and specialists. Management of low back pain has also been criticized as frequently arbitrary, inappropriate, or ineffective. Contributing factors have been an inadequate evidence base and a need for more rigorous appraisals of the available literature. Evidence-based medicine, an approach to clinical problem solving, is predicated on the premise that high-quality health care will result from practices consistent with the best evidence. In contrast to the traditional medical paradigm that placed a heavy reliance on expert opinion, authority, and unsystematic clinical observations, evidence-based medicine emphasizes the need for rigorous critical appraisals of the scientific literature to inform medical decision making. Evidence-based medicine places strong weight on the requirement for valid studies, particularly randomized controlled trials, to appropriately evaluate the effectiveness of health care interventions. Because of the rapidly increasing volume of medical literature, however, most clinicians are unable to keep up-to-date with all the new data. Two types of preprocessed evidence that can aid busy clinicians in medical decision making are systematic reviews and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Like primary studies, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines must adhere to high methodologic standards to reduce error and bias. As in other areas of medicine, the approach to the management of low back pain has been positively affected by the availability of more clinical trials and better use of critical appraisal techniques to evaluate and apply research findings. In addition to more rigorous primary studies, an increasing number of high-quality systematic reviews and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for low back pain are also available. Although some research gaps and methodologic shortcomings persist, the richer evidence base has greatly improved our understanding of what does and does not work for low back pain. Despite these advances, the best available evidence often does not inform everyday clinical decisions for low back pain. Nonetheless, there is widespread agreement that adherence to evidence-based practice will help improve low back pain patient outcomes and reduce arbitrary variations in care. This article reviews basic principles of evidence-based medicine, discusses evidence-based medicine in the context of low back pain management, and summarizes some useful evidence-based medicine resources.

Journal Article↗

Self-care guidelines for the management of nonspecific low back pain.

Low back pain is a very common disorder among adults. However, most low back pain is nonspecific; it has no known cause and cannot be given a precise pathoanatomical diagnosis. Nonspecific low back pain can be very painful, but it is not serious; it is basically an age-related disorder that is affected by differences in occupation, genetics, and personal behavior. There are many different treatments for nonspecific low back pain, but most of them are ineffective. Most patients improve considerably during the first 4 weeks-with or without medical treatment. There is increasing support in the medical literature for patients to assume more responsibility for self-care, and less dependence upon the health care provider. Evidence-based self-care guidelines are presented for use by both the health care provider and the patient. The guidelines offer advice regarding medication, exercise, physical activity, coping skills, and prevention of the next episode.

Adult↗

The efficacy of an aerobic exercise and health education program for treatment of chronic low back pain.

Low back pain is one of the most common and important musculoskeletal disorders. In addition, chronic low back pain can deteriorate the patient's physical, psychosocial and socioeconomic status. The objective of this quasi-experimental research was to assess the efficacy of an aerobic exercise and health education program in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Seventy-two patients whose ages ranged from 30 to 50 years who had chronic low back pain were enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups. Eight men and 28 women in the experimental group participated in a series of 3 health education sessions and an aerobic exercise training program. Nine men and 27 women in the control group received regular health education and a lumbar flexion exercise program. After a 3-month period of treatment, the results revealed the experimental group had statistically significant improvement of pain score and resting pulse rates when compared to the values of the control group (p-value < 0.001 and < 0.01, respectively). The average serum High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) in the experimental group was also significantly higher (p-value < 0.05) than that of the control group. This health education program is useful and may be applicable to patients with chronic low back pain as an alternative treatment.

Adult↗

Perspective on low back pain.

Low back pain is a common and expensive ailment among the working population. Despite the increasing amount of basic and clinical knowledge on low back pain, the precise causes of almost all cases cannot yet be defined. The tissues that could be the sources of pain in the low back have been better identified. The validity of the commonly used diagnosis of facet syndrome is now being questioned, and a favorable response to injection of the facet joints should not be considered an indication for posterior lumbar fusion. Studies continue to indicate that total body vibration and cigarette smoking have a relationship to disk degeneration. Improved imaging techniques such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging allow better visualization of the pathology in the vertebral column, but the correlation between these imaging findings and clinical symptoms has yet to be proven. Psychosocial factors are now recognized as important in patients with low back pain. Surgical procedures, even when appropriately indicated, have produced no better result than has the natural course of the condition.

Humans↗

Work-related low back pain.

Low back pain is a common problem among working adults in the United States. Occupational risk factors for low back pain include forceful lifting, bending and twisting of the trunk, whole body vibration and heavy manual labor. The initial assessment of the patient with low back pain requires obtaining an occupational history to identify risk factors in the workplace in addition to the usual inquiries and physical assessment. For those with uncomplicated low back pain, minimal use of medical tests and rapid return to limited activity are indicated. Long-term prevention of low back pain requires modification of occupational or other risk factors.

Adult↗

Test-retest reliability of patient reports of low back pain.

Low back pain is, in large part, a subjective illness. Clinicians must use patient descriptions of the severity and location of low back pain and how it responds to various activities and positions to make diagnostic and treatment decisions. Therefore, it is important to understand how reliably patients describe these aspects of low back pain. The purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of a visual analogue scale measure of pain intensity, a pain drawing measure of pain location, and the pain response to activity and position questionnaire. Fifty-three subjects (28 men and 25 women) with a mean age of 54.2 years were recruited from an outpatient orthopaedic clinic. They completed the visual analogue scale, pain drawing, and pain response to activity and position questionnaire before and again immediately after seeing their physician. Thirty-three subjects also completed the visual analogue scale and pain drawing measure that evening and the next morning. Test-retest reliability of the visual analogue scale and pain drawing measure was examined using an intraclass correlation coefficient. Reliability of each item on the pain response to activity and position questionnaire was examined by calculating an unweighted Cohen's kappa. Overall, the three pain measures demonstrated fair to good test-retest reliability: 1) visual analogue scale = .66-.93, 2) pain drawing = .58-.94, and 3) pain response to activity and position questionnaire = .46-.89. The results of this study suggest that, although there is some variability in how consistently patients report various aspects of low back pain, the reliability of these pain measures is sufficient to permit their use in making clinical decisions and measuring treatment outcomes.

Female↗

Impact of litigation on quality of life outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain.

Low back pain progresses to chronic low back pain (CLBP) in 5-10 per cent of patients. A Multi-disciplinary Pain Management Programme was tested in 20 patients (m = 4, f = 16). This regime involved psychological and behaviour modification strategies, combined with intensive exercise. Treatment outcome in terms of impairment was assessed by lumbar flexibility, trunk muscle endurance and pain. The disability assessed was exercise fitness and handicap was assessed using the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) to define the impact of the condition on the patient's life. Overall the patients showed significant improvement (p < 0.05) in all of the measured variables. Patients with on-going litigation however (n = 11) showed no significant improvement in the SIP quality of life score, although they shared the significant improvements attained by the whole group in the domains of impairment (lumbar flexibility, trunk muscle endurance and pain) and disability (exercise fitness).

Adult↗

Differential diagnosis of low back pain.

Low back pain is a symptom common to many vertebral and extravertebral affections. The origin of low back pain mostly derives from a pathology localized in the spine, as in the case of degenerative lesions, neoplastic lesions, infections, fractures, metabolic diseases such as osteoporosis, or more rarely, rheumatological diseases. The causes of extravertebral low back pain may be renal, pancreatic, gastrointestinal, or of the female genital apparatus. The authors present a series of clinical aspects which must always be taken into consideration in order to avoid errors in the diagnosis and evaluation of a patient with low back pain.

Diagnosis, Differential↗

Soft tissue determinants of low back pain.

Low back pain is one of the complaints most commonly seen in the clinical setting. Correctly or incorrectly, these patients are often given the diagnosis of fibromyalgia, myofascial pain syndrome, disk herniation, or some other label. It is important to recognize the soft tissue causes of low back pain and understand how they can be most appropriately diagnosed and managed. Nonligamentous disorders of the low back region may occur in isolation or in combination with underlying discogenic, ligamentous, and facet-mediated causes of pain. Therefore, in order to fully evaluate and treat a patient with low back pain, it is necessary to consider and address these soft tissue conditions. This paper reviews soft tissue causes of low back pain and discusses how they are most appropriately diagnosed and managed.

Fascia↗

[Is Qi Gong suitable for the prevention of low back pain?].

Low back pain is one of the main problems of health care, and has many causes. To prevent low back pain daily activities are highly important--static work as well as dynamic movement--carried out in an ergonomic and economical way. Studies have shown that the compliance of patients with regard to exercise training and ergonomic recommendations is not very high. The main posture of Qi Gong training is similar to the recommended posture by low back schools. Qi gong exercises respect basic physiological and ergonomic principles of movement in every way. Qi Gong fulfils the most important criteria for the prevention and therapy of idiopathic low back pain. Qi Gong training requires no special equipment. It is simple and can be undertaken everywhere. A growing number of people have become interested in Qi Gong, and train regularly and effectively. Low back pain rarely occurs in such people, and therefore Qi Gong should be considered as one of the most effective means of prevention.

Breathing Exercises↗

Continuous passive motion in seating: a new strategy against low back pain.

Low back pain commonly reduces tolerance for the prolonged sitting required by many occupations and routine daily activities. In order to provide lumbar lordotic continuous passive motion (CPM), a pneumatic device was developed. This device includes a lumbar support bladder, which is cyclically inflated and deflated by a pump and valve system. This system is controlled by a timer and by pressure feedback from the bladder. The user selects cycle duration and support pressure. Using a simulated automobile setting, the first part of this study demonstrated that CPM produces lumbar lordotic motion and improved comfort for subjects without histories of low back pain. In the second part of the study, 28 people with chronic low back pain reported greater comfort using CPM during their routine motor vehicle operation. Further research is needed to determine whether this promising new strategy against low back pain can reduce occupational disability due to sitting intolerance.

Adult↗