Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Lovastatin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Comparative pharmacokinetics of lovastatin extended-release tablets and lovastatin immediate-release tablets in humans.

The pharmacokinetics of lovastatin and its active metabolite lovastatin acid was evaluated in 9 healthy subjects in a three-period crossover study following a single oral dose of lovastatin extended-release (ER) tablets and lovastatin immediate-release (IR) tablets. Participants were dosed with lovastatin IR 40 mg tablets following a standard breakfast, lovastatin ER 40 mg tablets following a standard breakfast, and lovastatin ER 40 mg tablets underfasting conditions. Serial plasma samples were collected for up to 48 hours postdose and assayed for lovastatin and lovastatin acid using a liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy/mass spectroscopy method. Lovastatin ER tablets, unlike lovastatin IR tablets, exhibited delayed- and extended-release characteristics. The relative bioavailability, in terms of area under the curve values, of lovastatin (156%) and lovastatin acid (124%) was greater from lovastatin ER tablets as compared with lovastatin IR tablets when given with breakfast. An even greater increase in the bioavailability of lovastatin (261%) and lovastatin acid (231%) was observed when the lovastatin ER tablets were administered under fasting conditions. Thus, greater gastrointestinal tract drug absorption of lovastatin from lovastatin ER tablets was demonstrated. Ingestion of a standard breakfast prior to administration of lovastatin ER tablets decreased absorption of lovastatin by approximately 40%, relative to lovastatin ER tablets under fasting conditions.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Grapefruit juice greatly increases serum concentrations of lovastatin and lovastatin acid.

BACKGROUND: Grapefruit juice increases the bioavailability of several drugs known to be metabolized by CYP3A4. We wanted to investigate a possible interaction of grapefruit juice with lovastatin, a cholesterol-lowering agent that is partially metabolized by CY P3A4. METHODS: An open, randomized, two-phase crossover study with an interval of 2 weeks between the phases was carried out. Ten healthy volunteers took either 200 ml double-strength grapefruit juice or water orally three times a day for 2 days. On day 3, each subject ingested 80 mg lovastatin with either 200 ml grapefruit juice or water, and an additional dose of 200 ml was ingested 1/2 and 1 1/2 hours after lovastatin intake. Serum concentrations of lovastatin and lovastatin acid were measured up to 12 hours. RESULTS: Grapefruit juice greatly increased the serum concentrations of both lovastatin and lovastatin acid. The mean peak serum concentration (Cmax) of lovastatin was increased about 12-fold (range, 5.2-fold to 19.7-fold; p < 0.001) and the area under the concentration-time curve [AUC(0-12)] was increased 15-fold (range, 5.7-fold to 26.3-fold; p < 0.001) by grapefruit juice. The mean Cmax and AUC(0-12) of lovastatin acid were increased about fourfold (range, 1.8-fold to 11.5-fold; p < 0.001) and fivefold (range, 2.4-fold to 23.3-fold; p < 0.001) by grapefruit juice, respectively. The half-lives of lovastatin and lovastatin acid remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Grapefruit juice can greatly increase serum concentrations of lovastatin and its active metabolite, lovastatin acid, probably by preventing CYP3A4-mediated first-pass metabolism in the small intestine. The concomitant use of grapefruit juice with lovastatin and simvastatin should be avoided, or the dose of these 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors should be reduced accordingly.

Acids↗
PubMed2002

Pharmacokinetics of lovastatin extended-release dosage form (Lovastatin XL) in healthy volunteers.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of lovastatin extended-release dosage form (ER-lovastatin) in the dosage levels of 10, 20 and 40 mg in 9 healthy male subjects. Each subject was randomized to receive a single oral dose of ER-lovastatin either 10, 20 or 40 mg in a three-way crossover design with a washout period of 7 days between the treatments. Subjects were served dinner at approximately 5:30 PM followed by dosing at approximately 10:00 PM in each study period. Serial plasma samples were collected up to 48 h after dosing and assayed for lovastatin and its active metabolite lovastatin acid using an LC/MS/MS method. The plasma concentration-time profiles of lovastatin and its active metabolite lovastatin acid exhibited delayed- and extended-release characteristics at each dose. Mean (+/-) values for the C(max) of lovastatin were 1.04+/-0.43, 2.03+/-0.65 and 4.03+/-3.02 ng/ml for the 10, 20 and 40 mg dosage, respectively. The corresponding values for the AUC(0-48 h) of lovastatin were 14.6+/-7.8, 34.1 +/-13.7, and 53.9+/-35.6 ng h/ml. The same tendency was also found for C(max) and AUC(0-48 h) values of lovastatin acid. Results from this study demonstrated as the dose of ER-lovastatin increased from 10 to 40 mg, the C(max) and AUC(0-48 h) values of lovastatin as well as lovastatin acid appeared to increase linearly.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Itraconazole drastically increases plasma concentrations of lovastatin and lovastatin acid.

BACKGROUND: Lovastatin is a cholesterol-lowering drug that can cause myopathy as a rare side effect. Concomitant use of certain drugs (e.g., cyclosporine) increases the risk of skeletal muscle toxicity. Lovastatin is metabolized by CYP3A4. Because itraconazole is a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4, we wanted to study a possible interaction between these drugs. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, two-phase crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers received either 200 mg itraconazole or placebo orally once a day for 4 days. On day 4, each subject ingested a single 40 mg dose of lovastatin. Plasma concentrations of lovastatin, lovastatin acid, itraconazole, hydroxyitraconazole, and creatine kinase were measured up to 24 hours. RESULTS: On average, itraconazole increased the peak concentration (Cmax) of lovastatin and the area under the lovastatin concentration-time curve (AUC) more than twentyfold (p < 0.001). The mean Cmax of the active metabolite, lovastatin acid, was increased 13-fold (range, tenfold to 23-fold; p < 0.001) and the AUC(0-24) twentyfold (p < 0.001). In one subject plasma creatine kinase was increased tenfold within 24 hours of lovastatin administration during the itraconazole phase but not during the placebo phase. No increase in creatine kinase was observed in the other subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Itraconazole greatly increases plasma concentrations of lovastatin and lovastatin acid. Inhibition of CYP3A4-mediated metabolism probably explains the increased toxicity of lovastatin caused not only by itraconazole but also by cyclosporine, erythromycin, and other inhibitors of CYP3A4. Their concomitant use with lovastatin and simvastatin should be avoided, or the dose of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors should be reduced accordingly.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

A multicenter comparison of lovastatin and probucol for treatment of severe primary hypercholesterolemia. The Lovastatin Study Group IV.

A multicenter study was undertaken to compare the effects of lovastatin (given in 4 different dosage regimens) and probucol in patients with severe primary hypercholesterolemia. The subjects were 290 patients taking lipid-lowering diets who were randomly assigned to 1 of the following treatment regimens for 14 weeks: lovastatin, 40 mg once a day with the morning meal (qam); lovastatin, 40 mg once a day with the evening meal (qpm); lovastatin 80 mg qpm; lovastatin, 40 mg twice daily, or probucol, 500 mg twice daily. One-third of the patients received probucol, and the other two-thirds were equally divided between the 4 lovastatin treatment groups. The mean reductions in total cholesterol in the 5 groups were, respectively, 20, 25, 30, 33 and 10%. The corresponding values for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were 25, 32, 37, 40 and 8%. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased by 9 to 12% in all the lovastatin groups, but decreased by 23% in the probucol group. Triglycerides were reduced by 17 to 25% in all the lovastatin groups, but did not change significantly in the probucol group. Both drugs were well tolerated; no serious adverse events could be attributed to either agent. It is concluded that lovastatin is a considerably more effective lipid-lowering agent than probucol. In addition, lovastatin is almost as effective when given in a single daily dose as when given in a divided dose. When a once-a-day regimen is used, lovastatin is more effective if taken in the evening rather than the morning.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Biotransformation of lovastatin--III. Effect of cimetidine and famotidine on in vitro metabolism of lovastatin by rat and human liver microsomes.

The effects of the H2-receptor antagonists, cimetidine and famotidine, on the microsomal metabolism of [14C]lovastatin were investigated. Liver microsomes were prepared from control, phenobarbital- and 3-methylcholanthrene-pretreated rats and humans (male and female). Concentration-dependent inhibition of the metabolism of lovastatin (0.1 mM) was observed with cimetidine (0.1 to 1.0 mM). In contrast, famotidine at a similar concentration was a very weak inhibitor. The formation of 6'beta-hydroxy-lovastatin, the major microsomal metabolite of lovastatin, was similarly inhibited. The results suggest that in vivo metabolic interaction with concomitantly administered lovastatin is less likely with famotidine than with cimetidine. Phenobarbital pretreatment produced 58% stimulation in overall metabolism, whereas 3-methylcholanthrene pretreatment had no effect relative to control rats (5.4 nmol/mg protein/min). Liver microsomes from phenobarbital-pretreated rats produced 67% more of the 6'beta-hydroxy-lovastatin but 63-66% less of the 3''-hydroxy and 6'-exomethylene metabolites. Liver microsomes from 3-methylcholanthrene-treated rats also produced less 3"-hydroxy-lovastatin (49%) but similar quantities of the other two metabolites. 6'beta-Hydroxy-lovastatin was a major metabolite with human liver microsomes. Interestingly with these microsomes, hydroxylation at the 3''-position of the molecule was a negligible pathway and hydrolysis to the hydroxy acid form was not observed. The formation of 6'-exomethylene-lovastatin was also catalyzed by human liver microsomes (0.5 to 0.8 nmol/mg protein/min).

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Expanded clinical evaluation of lovastatin (EXCEL) study results: IV. Additional perspectives on the tolerability of lovastatin.

This randomized, double-blind, multicenter, diet-and-placebo-controlled study was designed to clarify the dose-response relationship of lovastatin therapy to lipid-modifying efficacy and drug-related adverse events. Exclusion criteria were minimized so that study patients were representative of the majority of patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia seen in medical practice. After 6 weeks on the American Heart Association Step 1 Diet, a total of 8,245 patients were randomly assigned to 48 weeks of treatment with diet and placebo or lovastatin at dosages of 20 or 40 mg once a day or 20 or 40 mg twice a day. All adverse events were monitored, with particular attention to evaluation of liver and muscle. Liver transaminase elevations suggestive of possible hepatotoxicity, defined as successive elevations in either aspartate transaminase or alanine aminotransferase greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal, occurred in equal numbers of placebo and lovastatin 20 mg/day treated patients (0.1%). The frequencies were higher in lovastatin 40 mg/day and 80 mg/day patient groups (0.9 and 1.5%, respectively). No patient was diagnosed as having clinically symptomatic hepatic dysfunction. Creatinine kinase (CK) elevations above the upper limit of normal occurred frequently in placebo- (29%), as well as lovastatin-treated patients (29-35%), and muscle symptoms were reported with similar frequency in all groups (7-9%). The combination of muscle symptoms with marked CK elevations (greater than 10 times the upper limit of normal) was seen in only five patients: one in a 40 mg/day dose group and four in the 80 mg/day dose group. No patient developed rhabdomyolysis. The incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events requiring discontinuation was 6% for the placebo group and from 7% (20 mg/day) to 9% (80 mg/day) for lovastatin treatment groups. No new types of adverse experiences related to lovastatin treatment were reported. Lovastatin, as an adjunct to diet for the reduction of elevated LDL cholesterol, was generally very well tolerated.

Alanine Transaminase↗
PubMed1991

Biotransformation of lovastatin. IV. Identification of cytochrome P450 3A proteins as the major enzymes responsible for the oxidative metabolism of lovastatin in rat and human liver microsomes.

Previous studies from our laboratories have shown that the metabolism of the cholesterol-lowering drug lovastatin by rat and human liver microsomes occurs primarily at the 6'-position, giving 6' beta-hydroxy- and 6'-exomethylene-lovastatin and that these oxidations are catalyzed by cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenases. In the present study, the specific cytochrome P450 form involved in lovastatin oxidation was identified through immunoinhibition studies. Among several antibodies prepared against various cytochrome P450s, only anti-rat P450 3A IgG inhibited lovastatin metabolism in liver microsomes from untreated, phenobarbital-treated, and pregnenolone-16 alpha-carbonitrile-treated rats. Lovastatin metabolism at the 6'-position was markedly inhibited (6' beta-hydroxy, greater than 95%; 6'-exomethylene, 70-80%) by this antibody whereas the effect of anti-rat P450 3A on the 3"-hydroxylation was variable depending on the source of the microsomes. With human liver microsomes, both anti-rat P450 3A and anti-human P450 3A inhibited lovastatin metabolism. Correlation between lovastatin oxidation and the P450 3A content in human liver microsomes (measured by immunoblot analysis) was excellent (r2 = 0.97). In addition, preincubation of human liver microsomes with troleandomycin and NADPH inhibited metabolism by 60%. These results clearly indicate that cytochrome P450 3A enzymes are primarily responsible for the metabolism of lovastatin in rat and human liver microsomes.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Lack of effect of lovastatin on restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Lovastatin Restenosis Trial Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Experimental and clinical observations suggest that lowering serum lipid levels may reduce the risk of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. We report the results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial evaluating whether lowering lipid levels with lovastatin can prevent or delay restenosis after angioplasty. METHODS: Seven to 10 days before angioplasty, we randomly assigned eligible patients to receive lovastatin (40 mg orally twice daily) or placebo. Patients who underwent successful, complication-free, first-time angioplasty of a native vessel (the index lesion) continued to receive therapy for six months, when a second coronary angiogram was obtained. The primary end point was the extent of restenosis of the index lesion, as assessed by quantitative coronary arteriography. Of 404 patients randomly assigned to study groups, 384 underwent angioplasty; 354 of the procedures were successful, and 321 patients underwent angiographic restudy at six months. RESULTS: At base line, the patients in the lovastatin group (n = 203) and the placebo group (n = 201) were similar with respect to demographic clinical, angiographic, and laboratory characteristics. At base line the mean (+/- SD) degree of stenosis, expressed as a percentage of the diameter of the vessel, was 64 +/- 11 percent in the lovastatin group, as compared with 63 +/- 11 percent in the placebo group (P = 0.22). Despite a 42 percent reduction in the serum level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the lovastatin group, after six months of treatment the amount of stenosis seen in the second angiogram was 46 +/- 20 percent in the placebo group, as compared with 44 +/- 21 percent in the lovastatin group (P = 0.50). Similarly, there were no significant differences in minimal luminal diameter or other measures of restenosis. A trend was noted toward more myocardial infarctions in the lovastatin group, as a result of acute vessel closure or restenosis at the site of angioplasty, but there were no other important differences between the two groups in the frequency of fatal or nonfatal events at six months. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with high-dose lovastatin initiated before coronary angioplasty does not prevent or delay the process of restenosis in the first six months after the procedure.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1988

A multicenter comparison of lovastatin and cholestyramine therapy for severe primary hypercholesterolemia. The Lovastatin Study Group III.

This study compares lovastatin and cholestyramine resin therapy in patients with severe primary hypercholesterolemia. Two hundred sixty-four patients on lipid-lowering diets were randomized equally to receive 12 g of cholestyramine resin, 20 mg of lovastatin, or 40 mg of lovastatin, each twice a day. The mean reductions among the three groups after 12 weeks' treatment in levels of total plasma cholesterol (-17%, -27%, and -34%, respectively) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-23%, -32%, and -42%, respectively) and the median reductions in apolipoprotein B levels (-21%, -28%, and -33%, respectively) were all significantly different between groups. Similar mean increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (8%, 9%, and 8%, respectively) and median increases in apolipoprotein A-1 levels (7%, 6%, and 11%, respectively) were observed in all treatment groups. Cholestyramine resin treatment had no significant effect on very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-II levels and produced a median 11% increase in plasma triglyceride concentration; in contrast, administration of either 20 or 40 mg of lovastatin twice a day was associated with median reductions in very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (-34% and -31%, respectively) and plasma triglyceride levels (-21% and -27%, respectively) and median increases in levels of apolipoprotein A-II (8% and 13%, respectively). Adverse events in all treatment groups were preponderantly in the gastrointestinal tract; gastrointestinal tract symptoms that could be attributed to therapy with a specific drug occurred in 58% of the cholestyramine resin group, 13% of the 20-mg lovastatin group, and 14% of the 40-mg lovastatin group. The only drug-attributable serious adverse event was a reversible myopathy in a patient taking 40 mg of lovastatin twice a day. We conclude that lovastatin is both more effective and better tolerated than cholestyramine resin in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Lovastatin disrupts early events in insulin signaling: a potential mechanism of lovastatin's anti-mitogenic activity.

The mechanism by which lovastatin lowers cholesterol levels is well characterized but little is known about its anti-mitogenic and anti-tumorigenic mechanism. Here we demonstrate that lovastatin disrupts early events in the mitogenic signaling pathways of insulin. Insulin treatment (200 mM) of quiescent HIR rat-1 fibroblasts results in an 8-fold stimulation of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI-3-K) activity. Overnight pretreatment of cells with lovastatin (20 microM) inhibits insulin stimulation of PI-3-K activity by 75%. Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting experiments using antibodies against the regulatory subunit of PI-3-K (p85), phosphotyrosine, and insulin receptor alpha and beta subunits demonstrate that lovastatin inhibits the association of p85 with tyrosine phosphorylated insulin receptor substrate-1 and the beta subunit of the insulin receptor. Furthermore, lovastatin dramatically reduces (70-100%) the level of tyrosine phosphorylated insulin receptor beta subunit following insulin stimulation. These results clearly demonstrate that lovastatin disrupts early events of insulin mitogenic signaling by reducing the levels of tyrosine phosphorylated beta subunit and suggest that this disruption is a potential mechanism for the anti-mitogenic effect of lovastatin.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

A multicenter comparative trial of lovastatin and pravastatin in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. The Lovastatin Pravastatin Study Group.

A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial in 672 hypercholesterolemic patients evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of lovastatin and pravastatin across their usually recommended dosage ranges (lovastatin 20 to 80 mg/day and pravastatin 10 to 40 mg/day). After a 7-week placebo and diet run-in period, patients with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol > 160 mg/dl (4.1 mmol/liter) were randomized to 20 mg/day of lovastatin, or 10 mg/day of pravastatin for 6 weeks. The doses were then increased to 40 and 80 mg/day of lovastatin, and 20 and 40 mg/day of pravastatin at weeks 6 and 12, respectively. Efficacy and safety evaluations were performed at weeks 6, 12 and 18. The mean percent changes from baseline in LDL cholesterol at weeks 6, 12 and 18 were -28, -33 and -39%, respectively, with lovastatin, and -19, -25 and -27%, respectively, with pravastatin. All changes were significantly different from 0 (p < 0.001), and the between-group differences were highly significant (p < 0.001). The frequency of adverse events leading to discontinuation was low (2.9% with lovastatin, and 2.4% with pravastatin), with no significant differences between groups. Across the recommended dosage ranges, lovastatin was more effective than pravastatin in reducing total and LDL cholesterol; however, both agents had similar safety profiles.

Cholesterol, LDL↗
PubMed1997

Post-transplant hyperlipidaemia: low-dose lovastatin lowers atherogenic lipids without plasma accumulation of lovastatin.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was twofold. First, to determine the frequency of hyperlipidaemia after heart transplantation (Tx) in relation to values obtained before Tx. Secondly, to examine the effect of low-dose lovastatin on possible antiatherogenic mechanisms and test the hypothesis that the side-effects are dose-dependent. SUBJECTS AND DESIGN: Retrospective study of the frequency of hyperlipidaemia disturbances in heart transplant patients. In addition, in a prospective study, the safety and efficacy of incremental low doses of lovastatin up to 20 mg day-1 were studied, with measurements of its plasma concentration in 24 cyclosporin A treated heart (n = 14) and kidney (n = 10) recipients with total cholesterol > 7.5 mmol L-1. RESULTS: Cholesterol increased markedly after heart transplantation from a pretransplant value of 5.3 (5.0,5.6) mmol L-1 to 6.7 (6.4,7.0) mmol L-1 after 1 year and then remained constant, but this increase was largely due to a 'normalization' since cholesterol decreased significantly during increasing heart failure before transplantation. Treatment with lovastatin decreased total cholesterol by 19% (P < 0.001), primarily by an effect on LDL cholesterol. HDL cholesterol increased by 15% (P < 0.05), whereas triglycerides remained unchanged. Lovastatin also caused a significant reduction in apolipoprotein B of 16%, and lipid peroxidation of 40%, whereas apolipoprotein A-I, fibrinogen, and glycerol were unchanged. Plasma concentration of lovastatin was significantly higher in transplant recipients compared with controls, but there was no accumulation during incremental dosing of lovastatin. The drug was well tolerated without significant symptoms or evidence of myopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperlipidaemia is common after cardiac transplantation. Treatment with low dose lovastatin is well tolerated and has a favourable effect on atherogenic lipids.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Expanded Clinical Evaluation of Lovastatin (EXCEL) study results. Effect of patient characteristics on lovastatin-induced changes in plasma concentrations of lipids and lipoproteins.

BACKGROUND: Lovastatin produces consistent dose-related reductions in plasma levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol along with variable decreases in triglycerides and increases in high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Patient characteristics from the Expanded Clinical Evaluation of Lovastatin (EXCEL) study were examined to determine their association with the magnitude of lovastatin-induced changes in these lipids and lipoproteins. METHODS AND RESULTS: After a baseline period consisting of dietary therapy, 8,245 patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia were randomized to five groups that received 48 weeks of treatment with either placebo or daily doses of lovastatin ranging from 20 to 80 mg. By use of linear statistical models, 20 different patient characteristics were examined for modification of the dose-dependent responses observed. For LDL cholesterol, the following were associated with enhanced lowering (p less than 0.05; percent changes are placebo-corrected, adjusted mean changes from baseline for the 80-mg/day lovastatin group): full drug compliance (-41.9%) versus 80% compliance (-20.3%); an age of 65 (-43.4%) versus 45 years (-38.1%) for women; white race (-40.9%) versus black race (-38.0%); and 4.5-kg weight gain (-42.6%) versus 4.5-kg weight loss (-37.9%). Similar relations for enhanced triglyceride lowering were found with older age and weight gain. Patients with initially low HDL cholesterol (less than 0.91 mmol/l) and high triglycerides (greater than 2.26 mmol/l) had enhanced responses for these parameters: placebo-corrected percent changes at 80 mg/day were -27.4% for triglycerides and +12.3% for HDL cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patient characteristics had very little impact of clinical importance on the dose-dependent LDL cholesterol lowering found with lovastatin. In patients with initially high levels of triglycerides and low levels of HDL cholesterol, the elevation of HDL cholesterol produced by lovastatin appears to be enhanced.

Cholesterol, HDL↗
PubMed2004

Efficacy of once-daily extended-release lovastatin as compared to immediate-release lovastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

OBJECTIVE: to compare the efficacy and safety of 20 mg of lovastatin when administered once daily as an extended-release (ER) tablet or as an immediate-release (IR) tablet. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Male or female patients aged 21-70 years with hypercholesterolemia who provided written informed consent and met the inclusion criteria were screened. A total of 179 patients were enrolled: 100 male and 79 female; 153 were Caucasian, eight Black and 18 other races; the mean age was 56 years. Patients were generally in good health as evidenced by medical history, physical and laboratory examination. Patients were required to not exceed specific low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels depending on their risk category. The trial was conducted as a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled, double-dummy, two-way crossover study. Patients were washed-out of any prior lipid-lowering medications (period 1) and then received one ER or one IR lovastatin tablet for 12 weeks (period 2) and then washed out with placebo for 6 weeks (period 3). They then received the alternate treatment for an additional 12 weeks (period 4). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy variable was the combined mean percent change in LDL-C from baseline to endpoint for periods 2 and 4. Secondary variables included the mean percent change from baseline in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), and triglycerides (TG) for periods 2 and 4 combined. Least-square mean differences between ER and IR treated groups were estimated at both treatments. All tests were two-sided and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Both ER and IR lovastatin tablets produced statistically significant changes in the lipid profile from baseline. Differences in HDL-C (4.1% and 4.3% for ER and IR, respectively) and TG (7.4% and 10.4% for ER and IR, respectively) were not significant between treatments. TC (19.1% and 17.2% for ER and IR, respectively) and LDL-C (26.4% and 23.1% for ER and IR, respectively) were also reduced significantly from baseline by both treatments. However the ER lovastatin reduced TC by an additional 1.9% (p = 0.0355) and LDL-C by a further 3.3% decrease (p = 0.0028) as compared to the IR formulation. The increase in LDL-C efficacy is equivalent to an increase of 50% in the dose of IR lovastatin, suggesting that 20 mg ER is equivalent to about 30 mg IR in LDL-C-lowering capacity. No apparent difference in the safety profile between the two formulations was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The data show that 20 mg of ER lovastatin was about one and one-half times as effective at lowering LDL-C than the same dose of IR lovastatin. Both regimens were tolerated well.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Biotransformation of lovastatin. II. In vitro metabolism by rat and mouse liver microsomes and involvement of cytochrome P-450 in dehydrogenation of lovastatin.

Metabolism of lovastatin, a new cholesterol-lowering drug, by liver microsomes from rats and mice was investigated. Liver microsomes from rats catalyzed biotransformation of lovastatin at a rate of 3 nmol/mg of protein/min, whereas the rate of metabolism was 37% higher with liver microsomes from mice. The profiles of metabolites were similar, but the relative abundance of individual metabolites was species dependent. Hydroxylation at the 6'-position was the principal pathway of lovastatin biotransformation, whereas hydroxylation at the 3"-position of the side chain was a minor pathway. In both species the 6'-beta-hydroxy-lovastatin accounted for half of the total metabolism. Liver microsomes from rats produced 2- to 4-fold higher amounts of the other three metabolites, namely, 6'-exomethylene-, 3"-hydroxy-, and the hydroxy acid form, than mouse liver microsomes. The conversion of lovastatin to the novel 6'-exomethylene metabolite was catalyzed by cytochrome P-450 since it required microsomes and NADPH and was inhibited by SKF-525A, metyrapone, and 2,4,-dichloro-6-phenylphenoxyethylamine (DPEA). Furthermore, neither 6'-beta-hydroxy-lovastatin nor the 6'-hydroxymethyl analogs could be demonstrated to be intermediates in the formation of the 6'-exomethylene metabolite. The hydroxy acid form of lovastatin was not a substrate for liver microsomes from either species.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Combination therapy with low-dose lovastatin and niacin is as effective as higher-dose lovastatin.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine if low-dose lovastatin in combination with niacin causes a greater percentage reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol than lovastatin alone, and to determine if the combination increases the risk of serious adverse effects. design. Prospective, randomized, open-label, clinical trial. setting. Family medicine clinic of a university-affiliated hospital. Patients. Patients with fasting LDL cholesterol concentrations of at least 150 mg/dl after 4 weeks of dietary stabilization and washout of any cholesterol-lowering drugs. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-eight patients received lovastatin 20 mg/day for 4 weeks after dietary stabilization and washout. If LDL cholesterol remained above 130 mg/dl (100 mg/dl in patients with coronary artery disease), they were randomized to receive either lovastatin 40 mg/day or a combination of lovastatin 20 mg/day and niacin 500 mg 3 times/day. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was no difference in actual or percentage reductions of LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglycerides between the groups. A greater increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol occurred with combination therapy (p = 0.024). There was no difference in liver function tests, glucose, or uric acid between the therapies. Based on drug-acquisition cost, combination therapy is approximately 40% less expensive than monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Low-dose niacin plus low-dose lovastatin was as effective as higher-dose lovastatin in lowering total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. The combination may offer benefit in raising HDL cholesterol levels.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Background and methods for the lovastatin restenosis trial after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The Lovastatin Restenosis Trial Study Group.

Restenosis remains a critical limitation of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Recent experimental and clinical data have suggested that lovastatin, an hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, may reduce the rate of restenosis through reduction of low density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or possibly by direct effects. Lovastatin may therefore produce favorable alterations in endothelial healing, resulting in a decreased smooth muscle cell proliferative response to injury after angioplasty. Emory University, in conjunction with Merck Research Laboratories, has initiated a 10-center double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to assess the effect of both pretreatment and aggressive lipid lowering with lovastatin in reducing the rate of restenosis. Lovastatin achieves approximately 75% of its effect on LDL cholesterol by 1 week. Thus, patients scheduled for PTCA are randomly assigned pretreatment with lovastatin, 40 mg twice daily, or placebo 7 to 10 days before PTCA. Therapy is continued for 6 months, at which time repeat coronary arteriography is performed. A detailed safety algorithm was designed, with patients receiving lovastatin and matching placebo back-titrated on a 1:1 basis for LDL cholesterol less than 50 mg/dl. The power is a 90%, alpha = 0.05, 2-tailed test to reduce restenosis from 30 to 15%. The sample size is 360 patients in the 2 arms; allowing for a 10% dropout rate, approximately 400 patients will be randomized. Patients with successful PTCA, less than 50% residual diameter stenosis and greater than or equal to 20% diameter stenosis reduction are analyzed for restenosis at 4 to 6 months by quantitative coronary arteriography.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗