Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “LexA Repressor Protein”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1981

Purified lexA protein is a repressor of the recA and lexA genes.

Escherichia coli shows a pleiotropic response (the SOS response) to treatments that damage DNA or inhibit DNA replication. Previous evidence has suggested that the product of the lexA gene is involved in regulating the SOS response, perhaps as a repressor, and that it is sensitive to the recA protease. We show here that lexA protein is a repressor of at least two genes, recA and lexA. Purified protein bound specifically to the regulatory regions of the two genes, as judged by DNase I protection experiments, and it specifically inhibited in vitro transcription of both genes. The binding sites in recA and lexA were found to be about 20 base pairs (bp) and 40 bp long, respectively. The 40-bp sequence in lexA was composed of two adjacent 20-bp sequences, which had considerable homology to one another and to the corresponding recA sequence. These 20-bp sequences, which we term "SOS boxes," show considerable inverted repeat structure as well. These features suggest that each box represents a single repressor binding site. Finally, we found that purified lexA protein was a substrate for the recA protease in a reaction requiring ATP or an analogue, adenosine 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphate, and denatured DNA.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1983

LexA protein is a repressor of the colicin E1 gene.

LexA protein is a repressor of several chromosomal genes involved in the SOS response in Escherichia coli. In previous experiments, we found that LexA protein may also be a repressor of the colicin E1 gene. We now present evidence that the purified LexA protein strongly repressed the in vitro transcription of the colicin E1 gene. As determined in DNase I protection experiments, LexA protein bound with a high affinity to the approximately 40-base pair long sequence between the Pribnow box and the start codon of the colicin E1 gene. The sequence of the binding site was composed of two overlapped "SOS boxes" to which the LexA protein bound in a cooperative manner.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1990

Independent folding of individual components in hybrid proteins. Evidence that the carboxy-terminal 135 residues of the LexA repressor constitute a single autonomous domain.

Inactivation of the Escherichia coli repressor protein, LexA, takes place through a cleavage reaction which hydrolyzes the Ala84-Gly85 peptide bond near the center of the molecule. The mechanism of cleavage has previously been shown to be an intramolecular reaction stimulated in vitro by elevated pH or by the addition of activated RecA protein. The entire self-cleavage activity of LexA has been found to lie within a 135-residue tryptic fragment extending from Leu68 to the end of the protein at Leu202. Since the activity of self-cleavage is dependent on the proper three-dimensional structure of the protein, we have used it as a probe to investigate the extend of folding autonomy and functional independence of this 135-residue carboxy-terminal domain of LexA by applying a protein fusion approach. A series of twelve different hybrid proteins, containing LexA sequences in a variety of predefined primary structural arrangements, were constructed and evaluated for whether or not self-cleavage activity has been retained. The results revealed that retention or loss of activity is independent of the nature or size of the foreign protein used. Loss of self-cleavage was found to be a function of amino- or carboxy-terminal deletions in the self-cleaving LexA component of the fusion proteins. The present findings, together with the observations of other artificial fusions proteins and the naturally occurring bifunctional and multifunctional proteins, along with the data on helix packing, provide further support for the notion of modular architecture of proteins and suggest that when these autonomous units are fused, they retain their tendency to fold independently of the remainder of the polypeptide to generate physically linked active domains, rather than to fold dependently and yield scrambled structures.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1996

Interaction of Escherichia coli RecA protein with LexA repressor. II. Inhibition of DNA strand exchange by the uncleavable LexA S119A repressor argues that recombination and SOS induction are competitive processes.

The Escherichia coli RecA protein is involved in SOS induction, DNA repair, and homologous recombination. In vitro, RecA protein serves as a co-protease to cleave LexA repressor, the repressor of the SOS regulon; in addition, RecA protein promotes homologous pairing and DNA strand exchange, steps important to homologous recombination and DNA repair. To determine if these two functions of RecA protein are competing or parallel, the effect of uncleavable LexA S119A repressor on RecA protein-dependent activities was examined. LexA S119A repressor inhibits both the single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-dependent ATP hydrolysis and DNA strand exchange activities of RecA protein. As for wild-type LexA repressor (Rehrauer, W. M., Lavery, P. E., Palmer, E. L., Singh, R. N., and Kowalczykowski, S. C. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 23865-23873), inhibition of ATP hydrolysis is dependent upon the presence of E. coli single-stranded DNA binding (SSB) protein, arguing that LexA repressor affects the competition between RecA protein and SSB protein for ssDNA binding sites. In contrast, inhibition of DNA strand exchange activity is SSB protein-independent, suggesting that LexA S119A repressor blocks a site required for DNA strand exchange. These results imply that there is a common site on the RecA protein filament for secondary DNA and LexA repressor binding and raise the possibility that the recombination and co-protease activities of the RecA protein filament are competitive.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed1984

P. mirabilis RecA protein catalyses cleavage of E. coli LexA protein and the lambda repressor in vitro.

The cloned recA+ gene of proteus mirabilis substitutes for a defective RecA protein in Escherichia coli recA- mutants, and restores recombination, repair and phage induction functions to near normal levels. In a previous report, we described the purification and characterisation of the recombination activities of the P. mirabilis RecA protein (West et al. 1983b ). In this paper, we show that the purified protein catalyses the cleavage of both the Escherichia coli LexA protein and the bacteriophage lambda repressor in vitro. These results provide a direct biochemical basis for the interspecies complementation observed in vivo and suggest that P. mirabilis has an SOS regulatory network similar to that of E. coli.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Role of Escherichia coli RecA protein in SOS induction and post-replication repair.

The RecA protein of Escherichia coli plays a central role in DNA repair mechanisms. When it is incubated with single-stranded DNA and a nucleoside triphosphate, the purified RecA protein acts both by promoting cleavage of the LexA protein, the repressor of the SOS genes, and by catalyzing strand exchange between a variety of DNA molecules. A model for the regulation of the activity of the RecA protein in a cell exposed to a DNA damaging treatment is proposed.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed1995

Homotypic interactions of chicken GATA-1 can mediate transcriptional activation.

We used a one-hybrid system to replace precisely the finger II chicken GATA-1 DNA-binding domain with the binding domain of bacterial repressor protein LexA. The LexA DNA-binding domain lacks amino acids that function for transcriptional activation, nuclear localization, or protein dimerization. This allowed us to analyze activities of GATA-1 sequences distinct from DNA binding. We found that strong transcriptional activating sequences that function independently of finger II are present in GATA-1. Sequences including finger I contain an independent nuclear localizing function. Our data are consistent with cooperative binding of two LexA-GATA-1 hybrid proteins on a palindromic operator. The sensitivity of our transcription assay provides the first evidence that GATA-1 can make homotypic interactions in vivo. The ability of a non-DNA-binding form of GATA-1 to activate gene expression by targeting to a bound GATA-1 derivative further supports the notion that GATA-1-GATA-1 interactions may have functional consequences. A coimmunoprecipitation assay was used to demonstrate that GATA-1 multimeric complexes form in solution by protein-protein interaction. The novel ability of GATA-1 to interact homotypically may be important for the formation of higher-order structures among distant regulatory elements that share binding sites for this transcription factor. We also used the system to test the ability of GATA-1 to interact heterotypically with other activators.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1996

Interaction of Escherichia coli RecA protein with LexA repressor. I. LexA repressor cleavage is competitive with binding of a secondary DNA molecule.

Essential to the two distinct cellular events of genetic recombination and SOS induction in Escherichia coli, RecA protein promotes the homologous pairing and exchange of DNA strands and the proteolytic cleavage of the LexA repressor, respectively. Since both of these activities require single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and ATP, the inter-relationship between these reactions was investigated and found to display many parallels. The extent of active complex formed between RecA protein and M13 ssDNA, as measured by both ATP hydrolysis and LexA proteolysis, is stimulated in a similar manner by either a reduction in magnesium ion concentration or the presence of single-stranded DNA binding (SSB) protein. However, unexpectedly, SSB protein inhibits both LexA proteolysis and ATP hydrolysis (in assays containing repressor) at concentrations of RecA protein that are substoichiometric to the ssDNA, arguing that LexA repressor affects the competition between RecA and SSB proteins for limited ssDNA binding sites. Additionally, attenuation of LexA repressor cleavage in the presence of double-stranded DNA or by an excess of ssDNA suggests that interaction of the RecA nucleoprotein filament with either LexA repressor or a secondary DNA molecule is mutually exclusive. The significance of these results is discussed in the context of both the regulation of inducible responses to DNA damage, and the competitive relationship between the processes of SOS induction and genetic recombination.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed1989

"Activated"-RecA protein affinity chromatography of LexA repressor and other SOS-regulated proteins.

We have developed an affinity column to study the interaction of LexA repressor and other substrates with the activated form of RecA protein. Nucleoprotein complexes of RecA protein, (dT)25-30, and adenosine 5'-[gamma-S]thio-triphosphate were formed in solution and bound to RecA protein-agarose columns. These "activated"-RecA nucleoprotein complexes were retained by strong hydrophobic interactions. Purified LexA protein bound tightly to these activated RecA columns, whereas the LexA protein bound poorly to RecA-agarose alone. Once bound, LexA protein underwent specific proteolysis, and the fragments were released from the complex. The mutant LexA protein, LexA-SA119, which cannot carry out self-cleavage or RecA-mediated cleavage in solution, bound efficiently to the activated RecA column but was not cleaved, indicating that these columns can be used to identify residues involved in RecA-LexA binding. As an example of this use, nucleoprotein complexes were prepared using the RecA430 protein. In vivo the recA430 mutation blocks induction of the SOS response. LexA protein was not efficiently retained on the immobilized RecA430 complexes, suggesting that Gly-204 is required for efficient repressor binding. These results show that activated RecA affinity columns can be used to investigate the binding and cleaving properties of mutationally altered RecA and LexA proteins. Additionally, these activated RecA columns have been used to investigate binding interactions of phage lambda repressor, as well as the UmuC protein, which is required for chemical mutagenesis.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1990

Biochemical properties of the Escherichia coli recA430 protein. Analysis of a mutation that affects the interaction of the ATP-recA protein complex with single-stranded DNA.

The biochemical properties of the recA430 protein have been examined and compared to those of wild-type recA protein. We find that, while the recA430 protein possesses ssDNA-dependent rATP activity, this activity is inhibited by the Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB protein) under many conditions that enhance wild-type recA protein rATPase hydrolysis. Stimulation of rATPase activity by SSB protein is observed only at high concentrations of both rATP (greater than 1 mM) and recA430 protein (greater than 5 microM). In contrast, stimulation of ssDNA-dependent dATPase activity by SSB protein is less sensitive to protein and nucleotide concentration. Consistent with the nucleotide hydrolysis data, recA430 protein can carry out DNA strand exchange in the presence of either rATP or dATP. However, in the presence of rATP, both the rate and the extent of DNA strand exchange by recA430 protein are greatly reduced compared to wild-type recA protein and are sensitive to recA430 protein concentration. This reduction is presumably due to the inability of recA430 protein to compete with SSB protein for ssDNA binding sites under these conditions. The cleavage of lexA repressor protein by recA430 protein is also sensitive to the nucleotide cofactor present and is completely inhibited by SSB protein when rATP is the cofactor but not when dATP is used. Finally, the steady-state affinity and the rate of association of the recA430 protein-ssDNA complex are reduced, suggesting that the mutation affects the interaction of the ATP-bound form of recA protein with ssDNA. This alteration is the likely molecular defect responsible for inhibition of recA430 protein rATP-dependent function by SSB protein. The biochemical properties observed in the presence of dATP and SSB protein, i.e. the reduced levels of both DNA strand exchange activity and cleavage of lexA repressor protein, are consistent with the phenotypic behavior of recA430 mutations.

Acetates↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Regulation and autoregulation by lexA protein.

The lexA protein represses many genes in E. coli. When the cell's DNA is damaged, lexA protein is inactivated and these genes are induced. Three aspects of lexA protein's repressor function are reviewed: how it regulates genes of the SOS response, how it regulates its own synthesis, and how it recognizes its operator sites. Recent studies of lexA protein's repressor function have suggested that the concentration of intact lexA protein after induction may determine the detailed control of the SOS response.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1989

Genetic separation of Escherichia coli recA functions for SOS mutagenesis and repressor cleavage.

Evidence is presented that recA functions which promote the SOS functions of mutagenesis, LexA protein proteolysis, and lambda cI repressor proteolysis are each genetically separable from the others. This separation was observed in recombination-proficient recA mutants and rec+ (F' recA56) heterodiploids. recA430, recA433, and recA435 mutants and recA+ (F' recA56) heterodiploids were inducible for only one or two of the three functions and defective for mutagenesis. recA80 and recA432 mutants were constitutively activated for two of the three functions in that these mutants did not have to be induced to express the functions. We propose that binding of RecA protein to damaged DNA and subsequent interaction with small inducer molecules gives rise to conformational changes in RecA protein. These changes promote surface-surface interactions with other target proteins, such as cI and LexA proteins. By this model, the recA mutants are likely to have incorrect amino acids substituted as sites in the RecA protein structure which affect surface regions required for protein-protein interactions. The constitutively activated mutants could likewise insert altered amino acids at sites in RecA which are involved in the activation of RecA protein by binding small molecules or polynucleotides which metabolically regulate RecA protein.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1998

Gene activation by the AraC protein can be inhibited by DNA looping between AraC and a LexA repressor that interacts with AraC: possible applications as a two-hybrid system.

The Escherichia coli activator and repressor proteins AraC and LexA bind DNA as homodimers. Here we show that their heterodimerization through fused cognate dimerization domains results in repression of AraC-dependent gene activation by LexA. Repression also requires a LexA operator half-site located several helical turns downstream of the AraC operator. This requirement for a specific spatial organization of the operators suggests the formation of a DNA loop between operator-bound Ara/LexA heterodimers, and we propose that heterodimerization with the AraC hybrid provides co-operativity for operator binding and repression by the LexA hybrid. Consistent with a mechanism that involves DNA looping, repression increases when the E. coli DNA looping and transcriptional effector protein IHF binds between the AraC and LexA operators. Thus, we have combined the functions of three distinct transcriptional effector proteins to achieve a new mode of gene regulation by DNA looping, in which the activator protein is an essential part of the repressor complex. The flexibility of the DNA loop may facilitate this novel combinatorial arrangement of those proteins on the DNA. The requirement for protein interactions between the AraC and LexA hybrids for gene regulation suggests that this regulatory circuit may prove useful as an E. coli-based two-hybrid system.

AraC Transcription Factor↗
PubMed1988

Selection of DNA binding sites by regulatory proteins: the LexA protein and the arginine repressor use different strategies for functional specificity.

The DNA sequences in the operator sites of the arginine regulon and of the SOS regulon have been subject to a statistical analysis. A quantitative correlation is found between the statistics of sequence choice and the activity at individual operator sites in both systems, as expected from theoretical considerations [Berg & von Hippel, J.Mol.Biol. (1987) 193, 723-750]. Based on these correlations it is possible to predict the effect of various sequence mutations. There is a significant difference in the slopes of the correlation lines between sequence and activity for the two systems. From this difference it can be expected that individual point mutations in the ARG boxes will have a much smaller effect on activity than similar changes in the SOS boxes. This difference may be related to a strong cooperative activity at tandem ARG boxes while the binding at SOS boxes appears to be mostly noncooperative.

Arginine↗
PubMed1996

Targeting of retroviral integrase by fusion to a heterologous DNA binding domain: in vitro activities and incorporation of a fusion protein into viral particles.

Retroviral DNA integration is catalyzed by a viral protein, the integrase (IN). IN recognizes sequences at the viral DNA ends, specifically nicks these ends (the processing reaction), and inserts them into host DNA (the joining reaction). The mechanism by which host DNA integration sites are selected is unknown, although it is clear that many regions are accessible to the retroviral integration machinery. To investigate integration site selection, and to possibly influence this process, we have used a model system in which the avian sarcoma virus (ASV) IN, and segments thereof, have been fused to the Escherichia coli LexA repressor protein DNA binding domain (DBD). We provide evidence that a variety of such IN-LexA DBD fusion proteins can be directed to cognate lexA operators in vitro. Binding of precise N- and C-terminal fusion proteins to the operators is associated with a significant increase in the joining of viral DNA to sites immediately adjacent to the lexA operator region. We also carried out domain exchange and deletion experiments which revealed that the highly conserved "zinc-finger" domain of ASV IN is not essential for processing of viral DNA ends or joining of viral DNA ends to DNA target sequences. Last, the C-terminal fusion was engineered into the viral genome and we show that this protein can be incorporated into viral particles. Our results suggest that it might be possible to augment IN function in vivo through a heterologous domain. These observations have implications for retroviral-mediated gene therapy.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1987

RecA protein and SOS. Correlation of mutagenesis phenotype with binding of mutant RecA proteins to duplex DNA and LexA cleavage.

The RecA protein of Escherichia coli is required for SOS-induced mutagenesis in addition to its recombinational and regulatory roles. We have suggested that RecA might participate directly in targeted mutagenesis by binding preferentially to the site of the DNA damage (e.g. pyrimidine dimer) because of its partially unwound nature; DNA polymerase III will then encounter RecA-coated DNA at the lesion and might replicate across the damaged site more often but with reduced fidelity. In support of this proposal, we have found that the phenotype of wild-type and mutant RecA for mutagenesis correlates with capacity to bind to double-stranded DNA. Wild-type RecA binds more efficiently to ultraviolet (u.v.)-irradiated, duplex DNA than to non-irradiated DNA. The RecA441 (Tif) protein that is constitutive for mutagenesis binds extremely well to double-stranded DNA with no lesions, whereas the RecA430 protein that is defective in mutagenesis binds poorly even to u.v.-irradiated DNA. The RecA phenotype also correlates with capacity to use duplex DNA as a cofactor for cleavage of the LexA repressor protein for SOS-controlled operons. Wild-type RecA provides efficient cleavage of LexA only with u.v.-irradiated duplex DNA; RecA441 cleaves well with non-irradiated DNA; RecA430 gives very poor cleavage even with u.v.-irradiated DNA. We conclude that the interaction of RecA with damaged double-stranded DNA is likely to be a critical component of SOS mutagenesis and to define a pathway for the LexA cleavage reaction as well.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1995

Two classes of proteins dependent on either the presence or absence of thyroid hormone for interaction with the thyroid hormone receptor.

The thyroid hormone (T3) receptors (TRs) are hormone-dependent transcription factors that regulate expression of a variety of specific target genes. To help elucidate the mechanisms that underlie this transcriptional regulation and other potential TR activities, we used the yeast interaction trap to isolate clones encoding proteins that specifically interact with the ligand binding domain of the rat TR beta. Several such proteins, called Trips (TR-interacting proteins), were isolated from independent selections carried out either in the presence or absence of T3. Surprisingly, all of the Trips were dependent on hormone for interaction with the TR, with some interacting only when T3 is present and others only when it is absent. Nearly all of the Trips also show similar ligand-dependent interaction with the retinoid X receptor (RXR), but none interact with the glucocorticoid receptor under any conditions. The sequences of three of the Trips predict specific functional roles: one is an apparent human homolog of a yeast transcriptional coactivator, one is a new member of a class of nonhistone chromosomal proteins, and one contains a conserved domain associated with ubiquitination of specific target proteins. Consistent with the pleiotropic effects of TR and RXR, several other Trips show significant amino acid sequence similarity with proteins involved in various regulatory pathways. The inherent transcriptional activity of the Trips was tested in yeast, and a chimeric protein consisting of a fusion of Trip4 to the bacterial LexA repressor protein is a relatively strong transcriptional activator. Similar LexA fusions to Trip9 and Trip10 had no transcriptional activity on their own but, when coexpressed with both TR and RXR, conferred T3-dependent activation to a reporter gene controlled by LexA binding sites. We suggest that this indirect T3 response provides a novel mechanism for hormonal activation of gene expression, and that studies of the Trips will provide important insights into the specific mechanisms of action of TRs and other receptors.

ATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular Activitie↗
PubMed1986

Roles of RecA protease and recombinase activities of Escherichia coli in spontaneous and UV-induced mutagenesis and in Weigle repair.

The RecA protein has a second, direct role in the mutagenesis of Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda in addition to its first, indirect role of inducing the SOS system by enhancing the proteolytic cleavage of the LexA repressor protein. The need for RecA protease and recombinase functions in the direct role was examined in cells containing split-phenotype RecA mutations, in the absence of LexA protein. Spontaneous mutation of E. coli (his----his+) required both the protease and recombinase activities. The mutation frequency increased with increasing RecA protease strength. In contrast, UV-induced mutation of E. coli required only the RecA protease activity. Weigle repair and mutation of UV-irradiated phage S13 required only RecA protease activity, and even weak activity was highly effective; RecA recombinase activity was not required. RecA+ protein inhibited RecA (Prtc [protease constitutive] Rec+) protein in effecting spontaneous mutation of E. coli. We discuss the nature of the direct role of the RecA protein in spontaneous mutation and in repair and mutagenesis of UV-damaged DNA and also the implications of our results for the theory that SOS-mutable cryptic lesions might be responsible for the enhanced spontaneous mutation in Prtc Rec+ strains.

Bacterial Proteins↗