Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Levofloxacin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Tear concentrations of levofloxacin following topical administration of a single dose of 0.5% levofloxacin ophthalmic solution in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Several fluorinated carboxyquinolones are used to treat ocular infectious disease. Levofloxacin, in particular, has demonstrated activity against both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. OBJECTIVES: An open-label study was undertaken to assess the pharmacokinetics and ocular bioavailability of levofloxacin in human tears, and to determine the tear concentration of levofloxacin in healthy volunteers, following topical administration of a single-dose of 0.5% levofloxacin ophthalmic solution. METHODS: Volunteers received 1 drop of 0.5% levofloxacin in each eye and were assigned sequentially to 1 of 5 groups for tear sampling. Tear samples were collected on Schirmer test strips at 9 predetermined time points ranging from 5 minutes to 24 hours after administration. Six tear samples were collected at each time point (1 eye each from 6 volunteers), except the 24-hour time point, at which 12 samples were collected (both eyes of 6 volunteers). No eye had > 1 tear sample taken during the study. Levofloxacin concentrations were measured using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Thirty volunteers were enrolled, with 6 assigned to each of the 5 sampling groups. At 5 minutes after administration of a single topical dose of levofloxacin, the mean tear concentration was 49.19 +/- 26.73 microg/mL. The mean peak concentration of levofloxacin in the tear film, 221.06 +/- 256.68 microg/mL, was reached at 15 minutes after administration. At 4 hours after administration, the mean tear concentration of levofloxacin was 17.04 +/- 15.13 microg/mL. At 6 hours after administration, the mean concentration of levofloxacin was 6.57 +/- 5.26 microg/mL. At 24 hours after administration, levofloxacin concentrations > 2 microg/mL were measured in 2 of 6 (33%) subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin concentrations in the tear fluid after a single topical dose (1 drop) reached high levels quickly and remained above the minimum inhibitory concentration for most suspected ophthalmic pathogens (< or = 2 microg/mL) for at least 6 hours in most healthy volunteers, and for up to 24 hours in some volunteers.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2003

Meropenem prevents levofloxacin-induced resistance in penicillin-resistant pneumococci and acts synergistically with levofloxacin in experimental meningitis.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential synergy between meropenem and levofloxacin in vitro and in experimental meningitis and to determine the effect of meropenem on levofloxacin-induced resistance in vitro. Meropenem increased the efficacy of levofloxacin against the penicillin-resistant pneumococcal strain KR4 in time-killing assays in vitro and acted synergistically against a second penicillin-resistant strain WB4. In the checkerboard, only an additive effect (FIC indices: 1.0) was observed for both strains. In cycling experiments in vitro, levofloxacin alone led to a 64-fold increase in the MIC for both strains after 12 cycles. Addition of meropenem in sub-MIC concentrations (0.25 x MIC) completely inhibited the selection of levofloxacin-resistant mutants in WB4 after 12 cycles. In KR4, the addition of meropenem led to just a twofold increase in the MIC for levofloxacin after 12 cycles. Mutations detected in the genes encoding for topoisomerase IV (parC) and gyrase (gyrA) confirmed the levofloxacin-induced resistance in both strains. Addition of meropenem was able to completely suppress levofloxacin-induced mutations in WB4 and led to only one mutation in parE in KR4. In experimental meningitis, meropenem, given in two doses (2 x 125 mg/kg), produced a good bactericidal activity (-0.45 Deltalog10 cfu/ml.h) comparable to one dose (1 x 10 mg/kg) of levofloxacin (-0.44 Deltalog10 cfu/ml.h) against the penicillin-resistant strain WB4. Meropenem combined with levofloxacin acted synergistically (-0.93 Deltalog10 cfu/ml.h), sterilizing the CSF of all rabbits.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Cefotaxime acts synergistically with levofloxacin in experimental meningitis due to penicillin-resistant pneumococci and prevents selection of levofloxacin-resistant mutants in vitro.

Cefotaxime, given in two doses (each 100 mg/kg of body weight), produced a good bactericidal activity (-0.47 Deltalog(10) CFU/ml. h) which was comparable to that of levofloxacin (-0.49 Deltalog(10) CFU/ml. h) against a penicillin-resistant pneumococcal strain WB4 in experimental meningitis. Cefotaxime combined with levofloxacin acted synergistically (-1.04 Deltalog(10) CFU/ml. h). Synergy between cefotaxime and levofloxacin was also demonstrated in vitro in time killing assays and with the checkerboard method for two penicillin-resistant strains (WB4 and KR4). Using in vitro cycling experiments, the addition of cefotaxime in sub-MIC concentrations (one-eighth of the MIC) drastically reduced levofloxacin-induced resistance in the same two strains (64-fold increase of the MIC of levofloxacin after 12 cycles versus 2-fold increase of the MIC of levofloxacin combined with cefotaxime). Mutations detected in the genes encoding topoisomerase IV (parC and parE) and gyrase (gyrA and gyrB) confirmed the levofloxacin-induced resistance in both strains. Addition of cefotaxime in low doses was able to suppress levofloxacin-induced resistance.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Ceftriaxone acts synergistically with levofloxacin in experimental meningitis and reduces levofloxacin-induced resistance in penicillin-resistant pneumococci.

Ceftriaxone acted synergistically with levofloxacin in time-killing assays in vitro over 8 h against two penicillin-resistant pneumococcal strains (WB4 and KR4; MIC of penicillin: 4 mg/L). Synergy was confirmed with the chequerboard method, showing FIC indices of 0.25. In the experimental rabbit meningitis model, ceftriaxone (1x 125 mg/kg) was slightly less bactericidal (-0.30 Deltalog(10) cfu/mL(.)h) compared with levofloxacin (-0.45 Deltalog(10) cfu/mL(.)h) against the penicillin-resistant strain WB4. The combination therapy (levofloxacin and ceftriaxone) was significantly superior (-0.64 Deltalog(10) cfu/mL(.)h) to either monotherapy. In cycling experiments in vitro, the addition of ceftriaxone at a sub-MIC concentration (1/16 MIC) reduced levofloxacin-induced resistance in the two strains KR4 and WB4. After 12 cycles with levofloxacin monotherapy, the MIC increased 64-fold in both strains versus a 16-fold increase with the combination (levofloxacin + ceftriaxone 1/16 MIC). In both strains, levofloxacin-induced resistance was confirmed by mutations detected in the genes parC and gyrA, encoding for subunits of topoisomerase IV and gyrase, respectively. The addition of ceftriaxone suppressed mutations in parC but led to a new mutation in parE in both strains.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Susceptibility to levofloxacin of Myocobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients with HIV-related tuberculosis and characterization of a strain with levofloxacin monoresistance. Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS 019 and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group 222 Protocol Team.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the susceptibility to levofloxacin of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) obtained from patients with HIV-related tuberculosis and to characterize the molecular genetics of levofloxacin resistance. DESIGN AND METHODS: Isolates from culture-positive patients in a United States multicenter trial of HIV-related TB were tested for susceptibility to levofloxacin by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations in Bactec 7H12 broth. Automated sequencing of the resistance determining region of gyrA was performed. RESULTS: Of the 135 baseline MTB isolates tested, 134 (99%; 95% exact binomial confidence interval, 95.9-99.9%) were susceptible to levofloxacin with an MIC < or = 1.0 microg/ml. We identified a previously unrecognized mis-sense mutation occurring at codon 88 of gyrA in a levofloxacin mono-resistant MTB isolate obtained from a patient with AIDS who had received ofloxacin for 8 months prior to the diagnosis of tuberculosis. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical MTB isolates from HIV-infected patients were generally susceptible to levofloxacin. However, the identification of a clinical isolate with mono-resistance to levofloxacin highlights the need for circumspection in the use of fluoroquinolones in the setting of potential HIV-related tuberculosis and for monitoring of rates of resistance of MTB isolates to fluoroquinolones.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1996

In vitro susceptibility of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae to levofloxacin, selection of resistant mutants, and time-kill synergy studies of levofloxacin combined with vancomycin, teicoplanin, fusidic acid, and rifampin.

Among 180 clinical isolates of pneumococci, no strains were found to be resistant to levofloxacin (MIC, > or = 4 micrograms/ml) whereas 9% were resistant to ofloxacin and 7% were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Synergism was demonstrated by time-kill studies in nine of nine strains for the combination of levofloxacin and vancomycin and in six of nine strains for levofloxacin plus teicoplanin. The combinations of levofloxacin with rifampin or fusidic acid were indifferent. Resistant mutants could be selected using incremental concentrations of levofloxacin. For two of nine strains that were initially susceptible to levofloxacin, the MICs reached the resistance range (> or = 4 micrograms/ml). In contrast, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin selected mutants from the susceptible to the resistant range more frequently (four of six and six of seven strains, respectively). These data argue for further study of levofloxacin against penicillin-resistant pneumococci.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1996

Prevalence of resistance to three fluoroquinolones: assessment of levofloxacin disk test error rates and surrogate predictors of levofloxacin susceptibility. AST Surveillance Group.

More than 3,000 consecutive clinical bacterial isolates from 10 U.S. medical centers were subjected to standard broth microdilution and disk diffusion tests to determine their susceptibilities to levofloxacin, ofloxacin, D-ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Levofloxacin was confirmed to be twice as active as ofloxacin and to have activity comparable to that of ciprofloxacin, with minor variations in activity against some species. The prevalence of resistant isolates was 7.1% to levofloxacin, 9.3% to ciprofloxacin, and 11.2% to ofloxacin. The susceptibilities of some species to the quinolones were less than those reported in previous studies. Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates had the greatest variability in their susceptibilities to the three drugs between the participating centers. Two proposed zone size breakpoints for levofloxacin disk tests yielded similar low error rates. Ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin susceptibility test results correlated reasonably well with those of levofloxacin and could be used as surrogate indicators of levofloxacin susceptibility, but that resulted in some serious errors, and thus, direct testing of levofloxacin susceptibility is preferable. Replicate testing of standard quality control strains confirmed the established and proposed quality control parameters for all three quinolones tested.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed2006

Pharmacokinetic interaction between levofloxacin and ciclosporin or tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: ciclosporin, tacrolimus and levofloxacin in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Bacterial infections are common complications after organ transplantation. Fluoroquinolones are frequently used for treatment because of their broad spectrum of activity; but some of them, such as ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin, are reported to increase blood concentration of ciclosporin because they are metabolised by the liver through the same enzymatic pathway, the cytochrome P450 system. This study was performed to establish whether levofloxacin, a more recent fluoroquinolone that undergoes limited hepatic metabolism, interferes with metabolism and excretion of either ciclosporin microemulsion or tacrolimus. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out in two groups of renal transplant patients, on either ciclosporin or tacrolimus treatment, before and at the sixth day of treatment with levofloxacin. RESULTS: Levofloxacin significantly increased the mean area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) and the other pharmacokinetic parameters of ciclosporin and tacrolimus by about 25%. The interference of levofloxacin on the hepatic metabolism of these drugs was demonstrated by the concomitant decrease by 5% of polyclonal ciclosporin concentration, which is the expression of parent drug and its metabolites. Both before and during levofloxacin treatment we observed trough concentrations of monoclonal and polyclonal ciclosporin significantly lower in the evening (C(12)) than in the morning (C(0)); this observation suggests a circadian variation in the metabolism of this drug. However, no difference between C(0) and C(12) was observed with tacrolimus, confirming its more predictable bioavailability. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that levofloxacin partially inhibits the metabolism of both ciclosporin microemulsion and tacrolimus, and therefore close therapeutic monitoring of these two drugs should be recommended during levofloxacin therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Bacteremia due to viridans group Streptococci with diminished susceptibility to Levofloxacin among neutropenic patients receiving levofloxacin prophylaxis.

Despite the use of levofloxacin prophylaxis during the neutropenic period after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, viridans group (VG) streptococcal bacteremia developed in 6 (16.2%) of 37 patients who underwent transplantation between 1 January and 25 February 2001 at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. All 6 patients presented with fever and mucositis after a mean of 4.5 days of neutropenia, and 3 developed septic shock. All 6 VG streptococcal isolates from these patients exhibited distinct patterns on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. All isolates had diminished susceptibility to levofloxacin, 5 to gatifloxacin, and 4 to moxifloxacin. Quinolone resistance was associated with mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region of GyrA and (for 1 isolate) of ParC. The use of levofloxacin may select VG streptococci with diminished susceptibility to levofloxacin and other quinolones with enhanced activity against gram-positive organisms and, therefore, may not be optimal for preventing VG streptococcal bacteremia in neutropenic patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Absorption, distribution and excretion of 14C-levofloxacin after single oral administration in albino and pigmented rats: binding characteristics of levofloxacin-related radioactivity to melanin in vivo.

After single oral administration of (14)C-levofloxacin at a dose of 20 mg kg(-1) under non-fasting conditions, the absorption, distribution and excretion of radioactivity were studied in albino and pigmented rats. Good penetration of radioactivity into tissues was indicated by higher concentrations in most tissues compared with serum and there were no quantitative differences in the distribution of radioactivity between albino and pigmented rats except for melanin-containing tissues such as the uveal tract of eyes and hair follicles. There was selective and strong binding of drug-related radioactivity to these tissues in pigmented rats. The uveal tract concentrations reached the maximum value (C(max)) of 26.33 +/- 0.75 microg eq. g(-1) at 24 h after dosing and declined slowly with a terminal half-life of 468.1 h (19.5 days). The uveal tract concentration at 12 weeks was 0.73+/- 0.12 microg eq. g(-1), which is c. 1/36 of C(max). The AUC(0- infinity ) for the uveal tract was 12.58 mg h(-1) g(-1). The uveal tracts separated from one eye of each rat were extracted with 0.067 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and 1M HCl/EtOH (30:70), successively. In pigmented rats, approximately 85-48% of radioactivity bound to the uveal tract was released from the tissue by the washing procedures. Most of the eluted radioactivity was released with 1M HCl/EtOH (30:70), indicating that the binding to melanin is reversible, and hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions play an important role in the binding of levofloxacin and/or its metabolites with melanin-containing ocular tissues. Only unchanged drug was detected in the extracts of the uveal tracts. The concentrations and half-life of radioactivity in the uveal tract after dosing of (14)C-levofloxacin were found to be much lower and shorter than those after dosing of (14)C-chloroquine. It is unlikely that levofloxacin causes toxicity because of its much lower affinity to melanin-containing ocular tissues and shorter duration of therapy compared to chloroquine.

Albinism↗
PubMed2005

Preincubation of pneumococci with beta-lactams alone or combined with levofloxacin prevents quinolone-induced resistance without increasing intracellular levels of levofloxacin.

Preincubation of pneumococci with sub-MIC concentrations of ceftriaxone (1/16x MIC), cefotaxime (1/8x MIC), and meropenem (1/4x MIC) alone or combined with levofloxacin (1/8x MIC) over 6 h prevents the emergence of levofloxacin-resistant mutants after 96 h of incubation but does not affect the intracellular accumulation of levofloxacin in two penicillin-resistant pneumococcal strains, suggesting a link between the mechanism of action of beta-lactams and the emergence of quinolone-induced resistance in pneumococci.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed2002

Separation of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin and cinoxacin by high-performance liquid chromatography: application to levofloxacin determination in human plasma.

A selective, sensitive and accurate liquid chromatographic method with UV and fluorescence detection was developed, validated and applied for the determination of fluoroquinolones in human plasma. The effects of mobile phase composition, ion-pair and competing-base reagents, buffers, pH, and acetonitrile concentrations were investigated on the separation of six quinolones (cinoxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin). Sample preparation was carried out by adding internal standard and displacing agent and processing by ultrafiltration. This method uses ultraviolet and fluorescence detection and separation using a C(18) column. The recovery, selectivity, linearity, precision, and accuracy of the method were evaluated from spiked human plasma samples. The method was successfully applied to patient plasma samples in support of a levofloxacin pharmacokinetic study.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed1997

The clinical pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin.

Levofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antibiotic and is the optical S-(-) isomer of the racemic drug substance ofloxacin. It has a broad spectrum of in vitro activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as certain other pathogens such as Mycoplasma, Chlamydia, Legionella and Mycobacteria spp. Levofloxacin is significantly more active against bacterial pathogens than R-(+)-ofloxacin. Levofloxacin hemihydrate, the commercially formulated product, is 97.6% levofloxacin by weight. Levofloxacin pharmacokinetics are described by a linear 2-compartment open model with first-order elimination. Plasma concentrations in healthy volunteers reach a mean peak drug plasma concentration (Cmax) of approximately 2.8 and 5.2 mg/L within 1 to 2 hours after oral administration of levofloxacin 250 and 500mg tablets, respectively. The bioavailability of oral levofloxacin approaches 100% and is little affected by the administration with food. Oral absorption is very rapid and complete, with little difference in the serum concentration-time profiles following 500mg oral or intravenous (infused over 60 minutes) doses. Single oral doses of levofloxacin 50 to 1000mg produce a mean Cmax and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ranging from approximately 0.6 to 9.4 mg/L and 4.7 to 108 mg.h/L, respectively, both increasing linearly in a dose-proportional fashion. The pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin are similar during multiple-dose regimens to those following single doses. Levofloxacin is widely distributed throughout the body, with a mean volume of distribution of 1.1 L/kg, and penetrates well into most body tissues and fluids. Drug concentrations in tissues and fluids are generally greater than those observed in plasma, but penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid is relatively poor (concentrations approximately 16% of simultaneous plasma values). Levofloxacin is approximately 24 to 38% bound to serum plasma proteins (primarily albumin); serum protein binding is independent of serum drug concentrations. The plasma elimination half-life (t1/2 beta) ranges from 6 to 8 hours in individuals with normal renal function. Approximately 80% of levofloxacin is eliminated as unchanged drug in the urine through glomerular filtration and tubular secretion; minimal metabolism occurs with the formation of no metabolites possessing relevant pharmacological activity. Renal clearance and total body clearance are highly correlated with creatinine clearance (CLCR), and dosage adjustments are required in patients with significant renal dysfunction. Levofloxacin pharmacokinetics are not appreciably affected by age, gender or race when differences in renal function, and body mass and composition are taken into account. Important drug interactions exist with aluminium- and magnesium-containing antacids and ferrous sulfate, as with other fluoroquinolones, resulting in significantly decreased levofloxacin absorption when administered concurrently. These agents should be administered at least 2 hours before or after levofloxacin administration. Cimetidine and probenecid decrease levofloxacin renal clearance and increase t1/2 beta; the magnitudes of these interactions are not clinically significant. Levofloxacin appears to have only minor potential for significantly altering the pharmacokinetics of theophylline, warfarin, zidovudine, ranitidine, digoxin or cyclosporin; however, patients receiving these drugs concurrently should be monitored closely for signs of enhanced pharmacological effect or toxicity. Levofloxacin pharmacokinetics are not significantly altered by sucralfate when administration of these drugs is separated by at least 2 hours.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed2005

[Study of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dosing regimens of levofloxacin. METHODS: The drug concentrations in serum and urine were assayed by HPLC method and the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated after intravenous infusion of a single dose of 200 mg, 300 mg and 500 mg levofloxacin to healthy volunteers. The in vitro activity MIC of levofloxacin against 823 clinical isolates were determined and compared with other antimicrobial agents. Based on the above results, the PK/PD parameters C(max)/MIC and AUC/MIC were calculated and the dosing regimens of levofloxacin were proposed for infections caused by different pathogens. RESULTS: The results of clinical pharmacokinetic study showed that the C(max) of levofloxacin was 3.4 mg/L +/- 0.8 mg/L, 4.8 mg/L +/- 1.4 mg/L and 7.6 mg/L +/- 1.1 mg/L respectively, AUC(0-infinity) was 14.4 mg.h/L +/- 2.5 mg.h/L, 21.9 mg.h/L +/- 4.5 mg.h/L and 38.3 mg.h/L +/- 4.9 mg.h/L respectively, T(1)/2 beta was 6.2 h +/- 0.4 h, 6.4 h +/- 0.9 h and 6.5 h +/- 0.6 h respectively, and 69% +/- 5%, 69% +/- 6%, and 65% +/- 4% of the doses were excreted in urine within 24 h after intravenous infusion of a single dose of levofloxacin 200 mg, 300 mg and 500 mg. The in vitro pharmacodynamic study showed that levofloxacin was highly active against Hemolytic streptococcus and Moraxella catarrhalis. It was active against Streptococcus pneumoniae (including penicillin nonsusceptible strains), Hemophilus influenzae, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), Klebsiella pneumoniae and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Levofloxacin also had good activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and K.pneumoniae. However, most of isolates of enterococcal spp. were resistant to levofloxacin. Above 50% of Escherichia coli isolates were resistant to levofloxacin. Based on the results of PK/PD parameters, the adequate dosing regimens of levofloxacin should be once daily 200 mg once daily of levofloxacin was expected to be effective for the treatment of infections caused by M. catarrhalis. The regimen of 300 mg once daily could be effective for the treatment of infections caused by Hemolytic streptococcus. 500 mg once daily of levofloxacin was expected to be effective for the treatment of respiratory tract infections caused by S. pneumoniae or H. influenzae. For treatment of respiratory tract infections and urinary tract infections caused by levofloxacin-susceptible organisms including K. pneumoniae, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and S.maltophilia, 500 mg once daily of levofloxacin was needed to obtain good clinical efficacy. But PK/PD parameters predicted that 500 mg daily of levofloxacin was not effective for infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Enterococci. CONCLUSION: The proposed dosing regimens of levofloxacin based on PK/PD concepts are expected to provide good efficacy in clinical practice.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis against Streptococcus pneumoniae using levofloxacin 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily in plasma (P) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP).

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin in patients with respiratory infections such as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are poorly documented. This work aimed at assessing the pharmacodynamic target attainment against Streptococcus pneumoniae using levofloxacin 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg administered once daily in plasma (P) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia. The pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in elderly (>/=65 years) compared with younger patients (<65 years) hospitalized with CAP were simulated. Susceptibility data with S. pneumoniae from our ongoing national surveillance study (Canadian Respiratory Organism Susceptibility Study-CROSS) were then used to produce pharmacodynamic indices of AUC(0-24)/MIC(all.) Monte Carlo simulations were then used to analyse target attainment of levofloxacin using doses of 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily to achieve free drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) >/= 30-100 versus S. pneumoniae in patients with CAP. Pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin simulated after 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily dosing resulted in levofloxacin volume of distribution: elderly patients = younger patients, while levofloxacin clearance was: elderly patients < younger patients. Levofloxacin t(1/2) values were longer in elderly patients (9.8 +/- 2.5h) than younger patients with CAP (7.4 +/- 2.5h). Free levofloxacin AUC(0-24) as well as AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) for S. pneumoniae were higher in elderly patients than younger patients. Monte Carlo simulation using levofloxacin 500 mg yielded probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in P and ELF (95.7% and 98.1%) in elderly and younger patients (72.7% and 80.6%) respectively. Levofloxacin 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily had probability of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in P/ELF of 98.1%/98.6% and 99.2%/99.0%, respectively, in elderly patients compared with 89.9%/94.1% and 95.2%/96.5%, respectively, for younger patients. Probability of achieving of AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 100 in P or ELF was very low in both patient populations at different doses except in the case of elderly patients receiving levofloxacin in a dose of 1000 mg once daily P/ELF of 78.5%/87.0%. We conclude that levofloxacin pharmacokinetics in elderly patients with CAP are markedly different from those of younger patients. Levofloxacin 750 mg OD provides high probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in both plasma and epithelial lining fluid in patients with CAP including younger patients. Levofloxacin 500 mg OD provides high probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in elderly patients with CAP, although we favour the 750 mg dosing in these patients as well. Levofloxacin 750 mg OD results in high probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment and improved bacteriological outcome against S. pneumoniae in patients with CAP.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, excretion and plasma protein binding of 14C-levofloxacin after a single oral administration in the Rhesus monkey.

Levofloxacin's metabolism, excretion, and in vitro plasma protein binding, together with its pharmacokinetics, were studied in the Rhesus monkey in support of an anthrax efficacy study in this species. Three males and three female Rhesus monkeys were dosed with a single oral dose of 14C-levofloxacin at 15 mg kg-1 (2 MBq kg-1). Following dose administration, blood samples were collected up to 48 h post-dose, and urine and faeces were quantitatively collected up to 168 h post-dose. Blood, plasma, urine, and faeces were analysed for total radioactivity. Metabolite profiling and identification was performed using radio-high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry detection (LC-MS/MS). Additionally, the plasma protein binding of levofloxacin was determined in vitro by means of equilibrium dialysis. Peak plasma levels of total radioactivity and levofloxacin were rapidly reached after oral administration with a total radioactivity blood: plasma ratio close to unity. The elimination half-life of levofloxacin was estimated at about 2 h. Total radioactivity was mainly excreted in urine (about 57-86% of the dose) with faecal excretion accounting for only a minor fraction of the total amount of excreted radioactivity (about 7.4-14.7%). In the plasma, the majority of total radioactivity was accounted for by levofloxacin. In addition, two minor metabolites, i.e. levofloxacin n-oxide and presumably a glucuronide conjugate of levofloxacin, were detected. In the urine, five components were found, with levofloxacin being the major component. Minor metabolites included desmethyl levofloxacin, levofloxacin n-oxide, and a glucuronide conjugate of levofloxacin. In the faeces, the major analyte was a polar metabolite, tentatively identified as a levofloxacin glucuronide. The in vitro plasma protein binding was low (on average 11.2%) and independent of concentration (1.0-10.0 microg ml-1). No sex differences were noted in any of the investigations. The present data indicated that the metabolism and excretion pattern, and also the in vitro plasma protein binding of levofloxacin in the Rhesus monkey, were comparable with those previously reported in man, hereby supporting the use of this animal species in the efficacy evaluation of levofloxacin against inhalation anthrax. The shorter half-life of levofloxacin in the Rhesus monkey relative to man (2 versus 7 h) prompted the development of an alternative dosing strategy for use in the efficacy study.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

Levofloxacin. Its use in infections of the respiratory tract, skin, soft tissues and urinary tract.

UNLABELLED: Levofloxacin, the optically pure levorotatory isomer of ofloxacin, is a fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent. Like other fluoroquinolones, it acts on bacterial topoisomerase and has activity against a broad range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. Levofloxacin also appears to have improved activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae compared with ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin. Levofloxacin distributes well and achieves high levels in excess of plasma concentrations in many tissues (e.g., lung, skin, prostate). High oral bioavailability allows switching from intravenous to oral therapy without dosage adjustment. In patients with mild to severe community-acquired pneumonia receiving treatment for 7 to 14 days, oral levofloxacin was similar in efficacy to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin was superior to intravenous ceftriaxone and/or oral cefuroxime axetil. With levofloxacin use, clinical success (clinical cure or improvement) rates were 87 to 96% and bacteriological eradication rates were 87 to 100%. In the 5- to 10-day treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, oral levofloxacin was similar in efficacy to oral cefuroxime axetil or cefaclor. Levofloxacin resulted in clinical success in 78 to 94.6% of patients and bacteriological eradication in 77 to 97%. Oral levofloxacin was also similar in efficacy to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or oral clarithromycin in patients with acute maxillary sinusitis treated for 7 to 14 days. Equivalence between 7- to 10-day therapy with oral levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin was seen in patients with uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections. Clinical success was seen in 97.8 and 96.1% of levofloxacin recipients and bacteriological eradication in 97.5 and 93.2%. Complicated urinary tract infections, including pyelonephritis, responded similarly well to oral levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin for 10 days or lomefloxacin for 14 days. Clinical success and bacteriological eradication rates with levofloxacin occurred in 92 to 93.3% and 93.6 to 94.7% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin can be administered in a once-daily regimen as an alternative to other fluoroquinolones in the treatment of infections of the urinary tract, skin and soft tissues. Its more interesting use is as an alternative to established treatments of respiratory tract infections. S. pneumoniae appears to be more susceptible to levofloxacin than to ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin. Other newer fluoroquinolone agents that also have enhanced in vitro antipneumococcal activity may not share the well established tolerability profile of levofloxacin, which also appears to improve on that of some older fluoroquinolones.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Comparative antimicrobial activity of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae.

OBJECTIVES: Levofloxacin has good coverage against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. Recent reports demonstrate enhanced activity associated with a higher 750 mg dosage of levofloxacin. The objective of this study was to comparatively evaluate the activity of common regimens of levofloxacin (500 mg) and ciprofloxacin (500 mg), and a higher 750 mg levofloxacin regimen against penicillin susceptible and non-susceptible strains of S. pneumoniae. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An in vitro pharmacodynamic modelling apparatus (PDMA) characterized specific bacterial kill profiles for simulated regimens of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against four strains of S. pneumoniae. Total log reduction, time for 3-log reduction and AUC/MIC were determined. RESULTS: Ciprofloxacin was less effective than the levofloxacin regimens against all four study isolates. Ciprofloxacin produced 3-log reduction in only one isolate compared with all four isolates with the levofloxacin regimens. Bacterial regrowth did not occur over 12 h with levofloxacin; however, three of four isolates demonstrated bacterial regrowth with ciprofloxacin. None of the isolates were cleared from the PDMA by ciprofloxacin. The 500 mg levofloxacin regimen cleared two of four isolates and the 750 mg dose of levofloxacin cleared all study isolates. Respective AUC/MIC values for levofloxacin (500 and 750 mg) and ciprofloxacin were 44-89, 63-126 and < or =13, which correlated well with bacterial kill data. CONCLUSIONS: Both levofloxacin regimens were more effective than ciprofloxacin against the study isolates tested. The 750 mg levofloxacin regimen generated more favourable bacterial killing compared with the 500 mg levofloxacin regimen. In addition to using the 750 mg levofloxacin dose for nosocomial infections, this dose may also prove useful for the management of resistant pneumococcal infections.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗