Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Letrozole”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Letrozole, a new oral aromatase inhibitor: randomised trial comparing 2.5 mg daily, 0.5 mg daily and aminoglutethimide in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Letrozole International Trial Group (AR/BC3).

BACKGROUND: The study compares letrozole and aminoglutethimide (AG), a standard therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, previously treated with antioestrogens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 555 women were randomly assigned letrozole 2.5 mg once daily (n = 185), letrozole 0.5 mg once daily (n = 192) or aminoglutethimide 250 mg twice daily with corticosteroid support (n = 178) in an open-label, multicentre trial. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), with time events as secondary. ORR was analysed nine months after enrollment of the last patient, while survival was analysed 15 months after the last patient was enrolled. We report the results of these analyses plus an extended period of observation (covering a total duration of approximately 45 months) to determine the duration of response and clinical benefit. RESULTS: Overall objective response rates (complete + partial) of 19.5%, 16.7% and 12.4% were seen for letrozole 2.5 mg, 0.5 mg and AG respectively. Median duration of response and stable disease was longest for letrozole 2.5 mg (21 months) compared with letrozole 0.5 mg (18 months) and AG (14 months). Letrozole 2.5 mg was superior to AG in time to progression, time to treatment failure and overall survival. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in fewer patients on letrozole (33%) than on AG (46%). Transient nausea was the most frequent event with letrozole (7% on 0.5 mg, 10% on 2.5 mg, 10% on AG), rash with AG (11%, 1% on 0.5 mg, 3% on 2.5 mg letrozole). CONCLUSIONS: Letrozole 2.5 mg offers longer disease control than aminoglutethimide and letrozole 0.5 mg in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, previously treated with anti-oestrogens.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Superior efficacy of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III study of the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tamoxifen with that of letrozole, an oral aromatase inhibitor, with tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred seven patients were randomly assigned letrozole 2.5 mg once daily (453 patients) or tamoxifen 20 mg once daily (454 patients). Patients had estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive tumors, or both receptors were unknown. Recurrence during adjuvant antiestrogen therapy or within the following 12 months or prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease precluded enrollment. One prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease was allowed. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). Secondary end points included overall objective response rate (ORR), its duration, rate and duration of clinical benefit, time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival, and tolerability. RESULTS: TTP was significantly longer for letrozole than for tamoxifen (median, 41 v 26 weeks). Treatment with letrozole reduced the risk of progression by 30% (hazards ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.82, P =.0001). TTP was significantly longer for letrozole irrespective of dominant site of disease, receptor status, or prior adjuvant antiestrogen therapy. Similarly, TTF was significantly longer for letrozole (median, 40 v 25 weeks). ORR was higher for letrozole (30% v 20%; P =.0006), as was the rate of clinical benefit (49% v 38%; P =.001). Survival data are currently immature and not reported here. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Letrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in TTP, TTF, ORR, and clinical benefit rate. Our results support its use as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Phase III study of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: analysis of survival and update of efficacy from the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: To analyze overall survival (OS) and update efficacy data for letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter phase III trial randomly assigned 916 patients with hormone receptor-positive or unknown tumors letrozole 2.5 mg (n = 458) or tamoxifen 20 mg (n = 458) daily until disease progression. Optional cross-over was permitted at the treating physician's discretion. This report updates efficacy at a median follow-up of 32 months. RESULTS: The superiority of letrozole to tamoxifen was confirmed for time to progression (median, 9.4 v 6.0 months, respectively; P <.0001), time to treatment failure (median, 9 v 5.7 months, respectively; P <.0001), overall objective response rate (32% v 21%, respectively; P =.0002), and overall clinical benefit. Median OS was slightly prolonged for the randomized letrozole arm (34 v 30 months, respectively). Although this difference in OS is not significant, survival was improved in the randomized letrozole arm over the first 2 years of the study. Approximately one half of the patients in each arm crossed over. Total duration of endocrine therapy ("time to chemotherapy") was significantly longer (P =.005) for patients initially on letrozole (median, 16 months) than for patients initially on tamoxifen (median, 9 months). Time to worsening of Karnofsky performance score was significantly delayed with letrozole compared with tamoxifen (P =.001). CONCLUSION: This study documents the superiority of letrozole over tamoxifen in first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2002

Approval summary: letrozole in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

Letrozole (Femara; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ) is a nonsteroidal inhibitor of aromatase enzyme complex. It inhibits the peripheral conversion of circulating androgens to estrogens. In postmenopausal women, letrozole decreases plasma concentrations of estradiol, estrone, and estrone sulfate by 75-95% from baseline with maximal suppression achieved within 2-3 days of treatment initiation. Suppression is dose related, with doses of >or=0.5 mg giving estrone and estrone sulfate values that were often below assay detection limits. At clinically used dosage, letrozole does not impair adrenal synthesis of glucocorticoids or aldosterone. In 1998, letrozole was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women, with hormone receptor positive or unknown breast cancer, who had failed one prior antiestrogen treatment (i.e., for "second-line" treatment). Approval was based on two randomized trials comparing tumor RRs of patients receiving 0.5 mg of letrozole, 2.5 mg of letrozole, and either megestrol acetate (MA) or aminoglutethimide. In the megestrol trial, 2.5 mg/day letrozole was superior to 0.5 mg of letrozole and MA (RRs 24, 13, and 16%, respectively), whereas in the aminoglutethimide trial, there was no significant difference in 2.5 mg of letrozole and 0.5 mg of letrozole RRs (20 and 17%). There was a trend toward RR superiority of 2.5 mg of letrozole over aminoglutethimide (P = 0.06). Letrozole (2.5 mg) was the dose chosen for comparison with tamoxifen in the first-line setting. In July 2000, a marketing application for first-line letrozole treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive or hormone receptor unknown locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer was submitted to the FDA. A single double-blind, double dummy, randomized, and multicenter trial compared 2.5 mg of letrozole to 20 mg of tamoxifen (456 patients/arm). Letrozole was superior to tamoxifen with regard to time to progression (TTP) and objective response rate (RR). The median TTP for letrozole treatment was 9.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1-12.2] versus 6.2 months (95% CI 5.8-8.5) for tamoxifen, P = 0.0001, hazard ratio 0.713, (95% CI 0.61-0.84). RR was 32% for letrozole versus 21% for tamoxifen (odds ratio 1.74, 95% CI 1.29-2.34, P = 0.0003). Preliminary survival data (survival data are still blinded) indicate that letrozole is unlikely to be worse than tamoxifen. Both treatments were similarly tolerated. On the basis of these results, the United States FDA approved letrozole tablets, 2.5 mg/day, for first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive or hormone receptor-unknown locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The manufacturer made a commitment to provide updated information on survival.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1998

Letrozole, a new oral aromatase inhibitor for advanced breast cancer: double-blind randomized trial showing a dose effect and improved efficacy and tolerability compared with megestrol acetate.

PURPOSE: To compare two doses of letrozole and megestrol acetate (MA) as second-line therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer previously treated with antiestrogens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred fifty-one patients with locally advanced, locoregionally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive letrozole 2.5 mg (n = 174), letrozole 0.5 mg (n = 188), or MA 160 mg (n = 189) once daily in a double-blind, multicenter trial. Data were analyzed for tumor response and safety variables up to 33 months of follow-up evaluation and for survival up to 45 months. RESULTS: Letrozole 2.5 mg produced a significantly higher overall objective response rate (24%) compared with MA (16%; logistic regression, P = .04) or letrozole 0.5 mg (13%; P = .004). Duration of objective response was significantly longer for letrozole 2.5 mg compared with MA (Cox regression, P = .02). Letrozole 2.5 mg was significantly superior to MA and letrozole 0.5 mg in time to treatment failure (P = .04 and P = .002, respectively). For time to progression, letrozole 2.5 mg was superior to letrozole 0.5 mg (P = .02), but not to MA (P = .07). There was a significant dose effect in overall survival in favor of letrozole 2.5 mg (P = .03) compared with letrozole 0.5 mg. Letrozole was significantly better tolerated than MA with respect to serious adverse experiences, discontinuation due to poor tolerability, cardiovascular side effects, and weight gain. CONCLUSION: The data show letrozole 2.5 mg once daily to be more effective and better tolerated than MA in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer previously treated with antiestrogens.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Anti-tumor effects of letrozole.

The use of drugs, which inhibit estrogen biosynthesis, is an attractive treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-dependent breast cancer. Estrogen deprivation is most specifically achieved using inhibitors which block the last stage in the biosynthetic sequence, i.e., the conversion of androgens to estrogens by the aromatase enzyme. Recently, a new generation of aromatase inhibitors has been developed. Among these, letrozole (Femara) appears to be the most potent. When given orally in milligram amounts per day to postmenopausal women, the drug almost totally inhibits peripheral aromatase and causes a marked reduction in circulating estrogens to levels that are often undetectable in conventional assays. Similarly, neoadjuvant studies demonstrate that letrozole substantially inhibits aromatase activity in both malignant and nonmalignant breast tissues, and markedly suppresses endogenous estrogens within the breast cancers. These studies also illustrate anti-estrogenic and anti-proliferative effects of letrozole in estrogen receptor (ER)-rich tumors. Thus, tumor expression of progesterone receptors and the cell-cycle marker Ki67 is significantly and consistently reduced with treatment. Additionally, clear pathological responses as evidenced by decreased cellularity and increased fibrosis are seen in the majority of cases. These results translated into clinical benefit in a series of 24 breast cancers treated neoadjuvantly with letrozole (either 2.5 or 10 mg): tumor volume reductions > 25% were observed in 23 women, and > 50% reductions in 18 patients. Pathological and clinical effects are seen much more consistently than with tamoxifen. Thus, in a multicenter randomized trial of letrozole vs. tamoxifen (PE 024), clinical study outcomes were superior for letrozole in comparison with tamoxifen with regard to overall tumor response and an increase in the proportion of patients treated by breast conserving surgery. Letrozole has also been used in advanced breast cancer, both as second-line hormone treatment following tamoxifen failure, and more recently as first-line therapy. Trials of second-line treatment in which letrozole has been compared with either older aromatase inhibitors or progestins have shown equivalent or superior clinical activity and improved tolerability favoring letrozole. In first-line comparison with tamoxifen in metastatic disease, a phase III trial of over 900 postmenopausal women showed letrozole to be significantly better than tamoxifen in terms of overall tumor response rates, clinical benefit, and time to treatment failure. In summary, letrozole is an exceptionally potent and specific endocrine agent. In patients with ER-rich tumors, high rates of pathological and clinical response have been documented, and large phase III trials against established treatments such as tamoxifen and progestin suggest superior (or at least equivalent) clinical efficacy. Letrozole is a drug of immense potential and in the future is likely to occupy a central role in the management of postmenopausal women with hormone-dependent breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1998

Letrozole. A review of its use in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

UNLABELLED: Letrozole is an oral reversible nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor. Clinical tracer studies show that it inhibits peripheral aromatase by over 98% and suppresses blood and urinary estrogen levels by over 95% after 2 weeks of treatment in postmenopausal women. Letrozole also significantly inhibits intratumoral aromatase in vivo. The action of letrozole appears to be selective for aromatase; long term administration did not affect basal levels of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone or aldosterone, although slight decreases in cortisol levels were observed in 2 studies, these did not appear to be clinically significant. In 2 phase IIb/III trials, letrozole 2.5 mg/day achieved objective response rates of 19.5 and 23.6% which were sustained for a median duration of 24 and 33 months, respectively. The median duration of response compared favourably with both comparator agents, aminoglutethimide and megestrol (15 and 18 months, respectively), as did objective response rates (12.4 and 16.4%). Letrozole 2.5 mg/day was associated with an increase in median survival time of 8 and 3 months compared with aminoglutethimide and megestrol, respectively. According to analyses of overall function, letrozole 2.5 mg/day was significantly superior to both comparators with respect to duration of response and aminoglutethimide with respect to survival. Letrozole has a good short term tolerability profile. The adverse events reported most commonly in association with letrozole 2.5 mg/day in the 2 phase IIb/III trials were headache (1.1 and 7%), nausea (6 and 10.3%), fatigue (3.2 and 5%), hot flushes (4.9 and 5%) and peripheral oedema (6%). Events were usually mild to moderate in severity; adverse events necessitated discontinuation of treatment in 3% of letrozole 2.5 mg/day recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Letrozole, in common with vorozole and anastrozole, offers greater selectivity and potency of aromatase inhibition than the prototype aromatase inhibitor, aminoglutethimide, and can be administered once daily. Available clinical data suggest that letrozole achieves a significantly longer duration of response than megestrol and aminoglutethimide and longer overall survival than aminoglutethimide. However, direct comparisons are required to distinguish between the newer aromatase inhibitors. For this reason, letrozole should be recommended as a second-line treatment in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer whose disease has progressed on or failed to respond to antiestrogen therapy.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Double-blind randomised trial comparing the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors letrozole and fadrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of letrozole, an advanced non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor, and fadrozole hydrochloride, an older-generation drug in this class, we conducted a randomised double-blind trial in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive letrozole or fadrozole in a multicentre, randomised double-blind trial in Japan. One hundred and fifty-four eligible patients were treated with either letrozole 1.0 mg once daily (n = 77) or fadrozole 1.0 mg twice daily (n = 77), for a minimum of 8 weeks. RESULTS: Letrozole showed a significantly higher overall objective response rate [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] than fadrozole (31.2% and 13.0%, respectively; P = 0.011, Fisher's exact test). Clinical benefits defined as CR, PR and stable disease (no change in status for more than 24 weeks) were also higher in patients treated with letrozole (50.6%) than fadrozole (35.1%). Letrozole was significantly superior to fadrozole in terms of the dominant lesion in soft tissue, bone and viscera (P = 0.011, stratified Mantel-Haenszel test). Median time to progression was 211 days in the letrozole group and 113 days in the fadrozole group with no significant difference (P = 0.175, log-rank test). Letrozole markedly reduced the estradiol, estrone and estrone sulfate levels in peripheral blood within 4 weeks. The suppressive effect of fadrozole on these hormone levels was insufficient. Adverse drug reactions were observed in 35.9% of the patients treated with letrozole and in 39.5% of those treated with fadrozole with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.74, Fisher's exact test). Most of the adverse drug reactions were rated as grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: The results show letrozole at a dose of 1.0 mg once daily to be more effective in treating postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer than fadrozole at 1.0 mg twice daily, with similar safety and tolerability profiles.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Evaluation of tamoxifen plus letrozole with assessment of pharmacokinetic interaction in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer.

The goals of this clinical trial involving postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer were to: (a) examine the effects of letrozole on tamoxifen (TAM) pharmacokinetics; (b) examine estrogen suppression in patients receiving TAM plus letrozole; and (c) evaluate tolerability, toxicity, objective response, and time to progression for the combination. Postmenopausal women with measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer received TAM (20 mg daily) for 6 weeks, and then letrozole (2.5 mg daily) was added. To examine for any effect of letrozole on the levels of TAM and two metabolites [N-desmethyl-TAM and 4-hydroxy-TAM], serum samples were obtained at 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. To examine for aromatase inhibition, serum samples were obtained before treatment and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks for estradiol, estrone (E1) E1 sulfate, and sex hormone-binding globulin. A total of 34 patients were entered on this trial, and 23 patients were still on study at week 24, 18 of whom had blood samples available at both week 6 and week 24. The 95% confidence interval for the mean difference between levels at week 24 and levels at week 6 was -34 to 15 ng/ml for TAM, -35 to 45 ng/ml for N-desmethyl-TAM, and -1 to 2 for 4-hydroxy-TAM. For estradiol, a significant decrease (median, 88.5%; range, 73.7-95.2%) was identified after 6 weeks of letrozole, which was maintained for an additional 12 weeks. Similar significant reductions were identified for E1. E1 sulfate levels increased after 6 weeks of TAM alone but then decreased significantly after the addition of letrozole. Sex hormone-binding globulin levels were significantly elevated after 6 weeks of TAM alone and remained elevated after the addition of letrozole. Six of the 34 patients (17.6%) achieved an objective response (95% confidence interval, 6.8-34.5%), with a median time to disease progression of 7.6 months. There was no indication of a systematic decrease in TAM, N-desmethyl-TAM, or 4-hydroxy-TAM after the additional of letrozole. Estrogen suppression induced by letrozole was substantial despite the concomitant administration of TAM. The antitumor effect of TAM plus letrozole was less than expected.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[Letrozole (Femara), a new aromatase inhibitor for advanced breast cancer].

The study compares letrozole (Femara and aminoglutethimide (AG), a standard therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, previously treated with anti-estrogens. 555 women were randomly assigned letrozole 2.5 mg once daily (n = 185), letrozole 0.5 mg once daily (n = 192) or aminoglutethimide 250 mg twice daily with corticosteroid support (n = 178) in an open-label, multicenter trial. The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR), with time events as secondary. ORR was analysed nine months after enrollment of the last patient, while survival was analysed 15 months after the last patients was enrolled. We report the results of these analyses plus an extended period of observation (covering a total duration of approximately 45 months) to determine the duration of response and clinical benefit. Overall objective response rates (complete + partial) of 19.5%, 16.7% and 12.4% were seen for letrozole 2.5 mg, 0.5 mg and AG respectively. Median duration of response and stable disease was longest for letrozole 2.5 mg (21 months) compared with letrozole 0.5 mg (18 months) and AG (14 months). Letrozole 2.5 mg was superior to AG in time to progression, time to treatment failure and overall survival. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in fewer patients on letrozole (33%) than on AG (46%). Letrozole 2.5 mg offers longer disease control than aminoglutethimide and letrozole 0.5 mg in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, previously treated with anti-estrogens.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Plasma protein binding of letrozole, a new nonsteroidal aromatase enzyme inhibitor.

The protein binding characteristics of the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole were determined using 14C-labeled letrozole. The binding of letrozole in human serum was 60.1 +/- 2.9% as a mean obtained in six individual sera and was similar in human plasma. The binding in human serum remained constant at concentrations of letrozole ranging from 10 to 500 ng/mL. A similar binding value in human serum was obtained using equilibrium dialysis and ultrafiltration technique. Albumin (binding 55.1 +/- 1.4%) is the main protein involved in the drug binding to plasma proteins. Increases in letrozole concentration (10-500 ng/mL) had no effect on binding. Albumin binding appeared to be nonsaturable with a binding capacity of 2 L/mmol. Binding to alpha1-acid glycoprotein and to gamma globulins was lower than 10%. The fraction in erythrocytes with a hematocrit of 0.4 was found to be 35.2 +/- 2.7%. Letrozole binding to serum proteins of rat, dog, mouse, and rabbit was approximately 10% lower than that in human serum and approximately 20% lower than that in baboons. Tamoxifen (100-1,500 ng/mL) had no effect on the in vitro binding of letrozole. Ex vivo binding in plasma from patients after repeated administration of letrozole alone (61.4 +/- 2.6%) was the same as after combined administration of letrozole and tamoxifen (60.0 +/- 3.2%).

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Serum HER-2/neu and response to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole versus tamoxifen.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of elevated serum HER-2/neu on the response of metastatic breast cancer patients to an aromatase inhibitor versus an antiestrogen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred sixty-two estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients were randomized to first-line hormone therapy with either letrozole or tamoxifen. An automated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect serum HER-2/neu. RESULTS: For patients with normal serum HER-2/neu (70.5%), objective response rate (ORR; 39% in letrozole-treated patients v 26% in tamoxifen-treated patients; P =.008), clinical benefit (CB; 57% v 45%; P =.016), time to progression (TTP; median, 12.2 v 8.5 months; P =.0019), and time to treatment failure (TTF; median, 11.6 v 6.2 months; P =.0066) were significantly better in patients treated with letrozole. In the elevated HER-2/neu group (29.5%), there was no significant difference in ORR (17% in letrozole-treated patients v 13% in tamoxifen-treated patients; P =.45) or CB (33% v 26%; P =.31), but there was a strong trend in favor of a longer TTP with letrozole (median, 6.1 v 3.3 months; P =.0596) and a significantly longer TTF with letrozole (median, 6.0 v 3.2 months; P =.0418). Multivariate analysis revealed that elevated serum HER-2/neu was a negative predictor for ORR and TTP. CONCLUSION: Patients with normal serum HER-2/neu receiving letrozole demonstrated a significantly greater ORR and CB and longer TTP and TTF than patients receiving tamoxifen. Although in patients with elevated serum HER-2/neu there was no significant difference between letrozole and tamoxifen in ORR or CB, there was a strong trend favoring longer TTP and significantly longer TTF with letrozole.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Cost effectiveness of letrozole in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women in the UK.

OBJECTIVE: To simulate the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer from second-line hormone therapy to death, and to generate estimates of the cost and effectiveness of letrozole and megestrol in order to determine the incremental cost effectiveness of letrozole, expressed as cost per life-years gained. DESIGN: A decision-analytic model, using Markov process techniques, was designed to evaluate the lifetime clinical and economic consequences of treatment with letrozole compared with standard care with megestrol. The model was based on clinical trial results showing a clear advantage of letrozole in terms of time to progression and duration of response. SETTING: The setting of the study was that of the UK healthcare system in 1996. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: A hypothetical cohort of patients, identical to the patients recruited for the AR/BC2 clinical trial, who were postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who had previously failed to respond to first-line or adjuvant anti-estrogen therapy. INTERVENTIONS: The dosages of medications were 2.5 and 160 mg/day for letrozole and megestrol, respectively. The analysis covered the period from treatment initiation until death (lifetime model). Effectiveness was expressed as survival and time without progression, and the model also included all relevant economic measures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: Based on the model, the average survival time of the letrozole group was 2.1 years (25.3 months) versus 1.9 years (21.5 months) for the megestrol group, a gain in survival of 2.4 months (10.5%). The average time without progression, cumulatively calculated over the different treatment options, amounted to 20.2 months for letrozole and 17.8 months for megestrol, an increase of 13.7% for the former patients. The total average cost per patient for the treatment of advanced breast cancer starting from second-line hormone therapy until death was higher in the letrozole group at 7547 Pounds versus 6820 Pounds for the megestrol group (discounted at an annual rate of 5%), leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 3588 Pounds per life-year gained (1996 values). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the assumptions used in this model, letrozole offers a suitable alternative to megestrol in the treatment of second-line hormone therapy.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1999

Impact of tamoxifen on the pharmacokinetics and endocrine effects of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

This study examined whether the addition of tamoxifen to the treatment regimen of patients with advanced breast cancer being treated with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole led to any pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction. Twelve of 17 patients completed the core period of the trial in which 2.5 mg/day letrozole was administered alone for 6 weeks and in combination with 20 mg/day tamoxifen for the subsequent 6 weeks. Patients responding to treatment continued on the combination until progression of disease or any other reason for discontinuation. Plasma levels of letrozole were measured at the end of the 6-week periods of treatment with letrozole alone and the combination and once more between 4 and 8 months on combination therapy. No further measurements were done thereafter. Hormone levels were measured at 2-week intervals throughout the core period. Marked suppression of estradiol, estrone, and estrone sulfate occurred with letrozole treatment, and this was not significantly affected by the addition of tamoxifen. However, plasma levels of letrozole were reduced by a mean 37.6% during combination therapy (P<0.0001), and this reduction persisted after 4-8 months of combination therapy. Letrozole is the first drug to be described in which this pharmacokinetic interaction occurs with tamoxifen. The mechanism is likely to be a consequence of an induction of letrozole-metabolizing enzymes by tamoxifen but was not further addressed in this study. It is possible that the antitumor efficacy of letrozole may be affected. Thus, sequential therapy may be preferable with these two drugs. It is not known whether tamoxifen interacts with other members of this class of drugs or with other drugs in combination.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

The effect of second-line antiestrogen therapy on breast tumor growth after first-line treatment with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole: long-term studies using the intratumoral aromatase postmenopausal breast cancer model.

PURPOSE: The aromatase inhibitors letrozole and anastrozole have been approvedrecently as first-line treatment options for hormone-dependent advanced breast cancer. Although it is established that a proportion of patients who relapse on first-line tamoxifen therapy show additional responses to aromatase inhibitors, it has not been determined whether tumors that acquire resistance to aromatase inhibitors in the first line remain sensitive to second-line therapy with antiestrogens. The aim of this study was to determine whether aromatase-transfected and hormone-dependent MCF-7Ca human breast cancer cells remain sensitive to antiestrogens after: (a) long-term growth in steroid-depleted medium in vitro; and (b) long-term treatment with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole in vivo. METHODS: In the first approach, a variant of the MCF-7Ca human breast cancer cell line was selected that had acquired the ability to grow in estrogen-depleted medium after 6-8 months of culture. Steroid-deprived UMB-1Ca cells were analyzed for aromatase activity levels, hormone receptor levels, and sensitivity to estrogens and antiestrogens in vitro and in vivo. In the second approach, established MCF-7Ca breast tumor xenografts were treated with letrozole 10 microg/day for 12 weeks followed by 100 microg/day for 25 weeks until tumors acquired the ability to proliferate in the presence of the drug. Long-term letrozole-treated tumors were then transplanted into new mice, and the effects of antiestrogens and aromatase inhibitors on tumor growth were determined. RESULTS: Steroid-deprived UMB-1Ca breast cancer cells continued to express aromatase activity at levels comparable with the parental cell line. However, compared with MCF-7Ca cells, UMB-1Ca cells expressed elevated levels of functionally active estrogen receptor. The growth of UMB-1Ca cells in vitro was inhibited by the antiestrogens tamoxifen and faslodex and tumor growth in vivo was inhibited by tamoxifen. In the second approach, the time for MCF-7Ca tumor xenografts to approximately double in volume after being treated sequentially with the increasing doses of letrozole was thirty-seven weeks. Long-term letrozole-treated tumors continued to express functionally active aromatase. When transplanted into new mice, growth of the long-term letrozole-treated tumors was slowed by tamoxifen and inhibited more effectively by faslodex. Tumor growth was refractory to the aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and formestane but, surprisingly, showed sensitivity to letrozole. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid-deprived UMB-1Ca human breast cancer cells selected in vitro and long-term letrozole-treated MCF-7Ca breast tumor xenografts remain sensitive to second-line therapy with antiestrogens and, in particular, to faslodex. This finding is associated with increased expression of functionally active estrogen receptor after steroid-deprivation of MCF-7Ca human breast cancer cells in vitro.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Pivotal trials of letrozole: a new aromatase inhibitor.

Letrozole (Femara) is a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor that is approximately 10,000 times as potent as aminoglutethimide in vivo. Two pivotal multinational phase III trials have compared letrozole (0.5 and 2.5 mg/d) against megestrol acetate and aminoglutethimide, respectively, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The letrozole vs megestrol acetate trial showed the superiority of letrozole (2.5 mg/d) over megestrol acetate with respect to response rate, response duration, duration of overall clinical benefit (complete response plus partial response plus stable disease > or = 6 months), time to progression, and time to treatment failure. The letrozole-treated patients also showed a nonsignificant trend toward better survival. In the letrozole vs aminoglutethimide trial, letrozole (2.5 mg/d) was significantly superior in terms of duration of overall clinical benefit and survival. There were also strong trends favoring letrozole with regard to objective response rate and duration of response. Unexpectedly, both trials demonstrated a dose-response effect for 2.5 mg of letrozole over 0.5 mg in terms of response and overall survival. This finding raises the possibility that intratumoral aromatase suppression may be more relevant in breast cancer therapy than are plasma estrogen levels.

Aminoglutethimide↗
PubMed2003

Letrozole as a potent inhibitor of cell proliferation and expression of metalloproteinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) by human epithelial breast cancer cells.

P450 aromatase catalyzes the conversion of androgens to estrogens and plays a key role in the cell growth of hormone-dependent breast cancer in postmenopausal women. On the other hand, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which can degrade almost all components of the extracellular matrix, play a crucial role in tumor cell invasion and cancer metastasis. In the present study the effect of letrozole on cell proliferation of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive MCF-7 human epithelial breast cancer and MCF-12A human mammary epithelial cells was studied. The effect of letrozole on the in vitro release of MMPs, particularly type IV collagenases (MMP-2 and MMP-9), by the ER-positive MCF-7 cells was also investigated, using a solid-phase method of high sensitivity and accuracy. Using RNA isolates from cell lines MCF-7 and MCF-12A, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that only MCF-7 cells express the P450 aromatase gene. Study of the effects of letrozole alone and the hormones 17-beta-estradiol, testosterone and 4-androstene-3, 17-dione in the presence and absence of letrozole on cell growth at the DNA synthesis level showed that letrozole significantly suppressed the endogenous aromatase-induced proliferation of MCF-7 cells. The majority of MMPs secreted by MCF-7 cells were identified in their pro-forms, which was in accordance with the low metastatic potential determined for these cells. After treatment of cells with letrozole (10 nM) for 24 and 48 h, significant inhibition of MMP levels was obtained. Furthermore, concurrent treatment of MCF-7 cells with 17-beta-estradiol in the presence of letrozole significantly suppressed the estradiol-induced stimulation of MMP levels. The data obtained suggest that letrozole is a potent in vitro inhibitor of cell proliferation and of type IV collagenases expressed by ER-positive MCF-7 cells and may be of value for suppressing breast tumor growth and invasiveness.

Breast Neoplasms↗