Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Latex”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

Comparison of latex-specific IgE binding among nonammoniated latex, ammoniated latex, and latex glove allergenic extracts by ELISA and immunoblot inhibition.

BACKGROUND: Nonammoniated latex, ammoniated latex, and latex glove extracts have been used as source materials for the preparation of allergenic extracts for the diagnosis of latex allergy. These materials showed different patterns of protein bands and immunoreactive bands. However, their IgE-reactive repertoires were not compared. OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to compare the IgE reactivity and to define the common IgE-reactive epitopes among three latex allergenic extracts. METHODS: Two serum pools were obtained from adults and children with latex allergy to evaluate the IgE reactivity among three latex extracts. IgE reactivity and IgE-reactive proteins were compared by inhibition ELISA and inhibition immunoblot methods, respectively. RESULTS: In this study inhibition curves were similar for nonammoniated latex and ammoniated latex but were different when the latex glove extracts were used. Several protein bands of ammoniated latex and latex glove extracts could not be inhibited by the nonammoniated latex. The ammoniated latex and latex glove extracts were able to remove all the latex-specific IgE from the serum. CONCLUSION: The IgE-reactive proteins differ among different latex extracts. Ammoniated latex and latex glove extracts contain more complete immunoreactive repertoires for detecting IgE antibodies. Our study provides useful information for selecting the latex extract.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Natural rubber latex skin testing reagents: safety and diagnostic accuracy of nonammoniated latex, ammoniated latex, and latex rubber glove extracts.

BACKGROUND: Nonammoniated latex, ammoniated latex, and rubber glove extracts are the only sources of natural rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) latex that have potential for use as skin testing reagents in the diagnosis of latex allergy. Their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity as skin test reagents are unknown. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a phase 1/2 clinical study to examine the safety and diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of nonammoniated latex, ammoniated latex, and rubber glove extracts as skin test extracts to identify the most efficacious source material for future skin test reagent development. METHODS: Twenty-four adults not allergic to latex, 19 adults with hand dermatitis or pruritus, and 59 adults with a latex allergy were identified by clinical history. All provided blood and then received puncture skin tests and intradermal skin tests with nonammoniated latex, ammoniated latex, and rubber glove extracts from Malaysian H. brasiliensis latex by use of sequential titration. A glove provocation test and IgE anti-latex RAST were used to clarify positive history-negative skin test response and negative history-positive skin test response mismatches. RESULTS: All three extracts were biologically safe and sterile. After normalization to 1 mg/ml of total protein, all three extracts produced equivalent diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in puncture skin tests and intradermal skin tests at various extract concentrations. Optimal diagnostic accuracy was safely achieved at 100 micrograms/ml for intradermal skin tests (e.g., nonammoniated latex: puncture skin test sensitivity 96%, specificity 100%; intradermal skin test sensitivity 93%, specificity 96%). The presence of IgE antibody in skin was highly correlated with IgE anti-latex in serum (nonammoniated latex: r = 0.98, p < 0.001; ammoniated latex: r = 0.94, p < 0.001; rubber glove extract: r = 0.96, p < 0.001). All five available subjects with a positive history, negative skin test response, and absence of IgE antibody in serum had a negative glove provocation test response, indicating no clinical evidence of latex allergy. No systemic or large local allergic reactions were observed with puncture skin tests or intradermal skin tests. CONCLUSIONS: Equivalent diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were observed with the nonammoniated latex, ammoniated latex, and rubber glove extract skin test reagents after normalization for total protein; nonammoniated latex may be considered the reagent of choice on the basis of practical quality control and reproducibility considerations.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Latex-specific IgE, skin testing, and lymphocyte transformation to latex in latex allergy.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the discriminative value of latex-specific IgE tests, latex skin tests, and lymphocyte transformation tests (LTTs) to latex in 38 patients with latex allergy (12 nonatopic and 26 atopic) and 44 control subjects (24 nonatopic and 20 atopic). We also evaluated the recommended positive cutoff (i.e., 0.35 kU/L) of both in vitro latex-IgE tests. METHODS: Latex-specific IgE levels were determined by the Immuno-CAP (Upjohn-Pharmacia) and the ALaSTAT-RIA (Diagnostic Products Corp.) assays. Skin tests and LTFs were performed with a nonammoniated latex extract (DPC). Sensitivities and specificities were defined according to the 95th percentile value of nonatopic control subjects. For the in vitro IgE tests, sensitivity and specificity were also calculated by using the proposed positive threshold of 0.35 kU/L. Sensitivities and specificities of both cutoffs were compared. RESULTS: Compared with a clinical history of latex allergy and according to the 95th percentile value of nonatopic control subjects (0.44 kU/L), latex-specific IgE determined by the Immuno-CAP assay achieved a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 86%. For the ALaSTAT-RIA assay, with 0.54 kU/L as the 95th percentile threshold value in nonatopic control subjects, sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 83%. According to the threshold value of 0.35 kU/L, a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 83% for the Immuno-CAP assay and a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 33% for the ALaSTAT-RIA assay were observed. The latex skin test reached a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 100%. The LTF to latex showed a sensitivity of 39% and a specificity of 95%. No relation between symptoms and latex-specific IgE tests, latex skin tests, or LTTs was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that latex skin tests and latex-specific IgE assessments are sensitive and specific methods for establishing the diagnosis of latex allergy, although the specificity of the ALaSTAT-RIA assay was very low when interpreted according to the threshold of 0.35 kU/L. The LTT to nonammoniated latex is too insensitive for diagnosis of allergy to latex. This reemphasizes that in order to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic procedures, one should always include an appropriate control group.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Monoclonal antibody against a major latex allergen reacts with latex products and ammoniated natural latex.

Spina bifida patients have been shown to be a high-risk group for latex allergy. Of the several latex proteins identified from nonammoniated natural latex, a polypeptide with a molecular mass of about 23 kDa was shown to be one of the major allergens reacting with IgE in the sera from such patients. Using hybridoma technology, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) 1E2 against the 23-kDa latex allergen was produced. The presence of the 23-kDa or related allergens in finished latex products was evaluated using 1E2. Of the 16 extracts of finished latex products, 12 reacted with 1E2. The other four products are not used in health care. Since the majority of latex products used in health care are manufactured from ammoniated latex and ammoniation may alter latex proteins, we also investigated the effect of ammoniation on the 23-kDa allergen. Although ammoniation degraded latex proteins, the 23-kDa antigen could still be detected by using mAb 1E2 on immunoblot of ammoniated latex proteins. Furthermore, ammoniation resulted in the appearance of additional proteins in high molecular weight positions not present in nonammoniated natural latex, which retained the 23-kDa epitope. The 23-kDa allergen could also be detected on surgical gloves after extensive washing.

Allergens↗
PubMed1995

Comparison of latex antigens from surgical gloves, ammoniated and nonammoniated latex: effect of ammonia treatment on natural rubber latex proteins.

Immediate hypersensitivity to latex proteins from contact with natural rubber latex gloves has been increasingly reported, especially in health care workers. Proteins in the latex responsible for these reactions may potentially be extractable, adsorbed on glove powder, or remain unextractable. Because these gloves are manufactured from ammoniated natural rubber latex, our knowledge on the effect of ammonia on latex proteins is incomplete. Therefore, we have investigated the effect of ammoniation on the protein profile and antigenicity or allergenicity of natural rubber latex proteins (NAL). Results indicate that ammonia treatment leads to breakdown and even precipitation of certain latex proteins. However, the antigenicity or allergenicity of NAL is preserved in the degraded proteins that present as extractable latex antigens of gloves. In addition to the proteins present in glove extract and proteins adsorbed to glove powder, certain latex proteins (23, 10, and 8 kd) remain firmly bound to glove film as "unextractable" latex antigens that cannot be removed by washing. The unextractable latex antigens may represent the antigens precipitated by ammonia treatment and may be associated with latex allergy.

Ammonia↗
PubMed1997

Latex allergen elimination in natural latex sap and latex gloves by treatment with alkaline potassium hydroxide solution.

Antigenic proteins in latex products can cause type I allergy. We investigated the effects of potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution on the allergenicity of proteins in natural latex sap and latex gloves by using an EAST competitive inhibition immunoassay and skin prick test. Latex sap was mixed with KOH solution at different concentrations and incubated over various periods of time at room temperature. Latex gloves were washed in KOH solution for different times at 30 degrees C and 90 degrees C. Our immunoassay results for the subsequently extracted latex proteins demonstrated a KOH concentration-, temperature-, and time-dependent decrease in allergenicity, finally resulting in complete loss of IgE-binding activity. In the skin prick test, we found only four weakly positive reactions to proteins extracted from KOH-washed gloves in 30 latex-sensitized patients. In addition, up to 97% of the aqueous extractable protein content could be removed from latex gloves by washing in KOH solution under certain conditions. These results suggest that antigenic proteins in natural latex sap and latex gloves can be changed by treatment with KOH solution, which is followed by a loss of their capability to bind specific IgE antibodies from most latex-sensitized patients.

Allergens↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Characterization of latex antigen and demonstration of latex-specific antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in patients with latex hypersensitivity.

Two latex antigens, one extracted from surgical gloves (GE) and the other from the sap of Hevea brasiliensis plant (RPE) were characterized by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. These antigens were used to detect latex specific IgE and IgG antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the sera of patients with meningomyelocele (spina bifida) and of normal controls. Of the 36 patients studied, 26 had wheal-and-flare skin-prick test reactivity to latex antigen with 11/26 having had a history of anaphylaxis to latex products. Twenty three of the 26 sera from skin-test positive patients and 10/11 patients with history of anaphylaxis demonstrated significant levels of latex specific IgE and IgG in the sera, whereas only 1/14 normals showed significant antibodies to latex. The remaining 10 patients, all skin-test negative with latex antigens, showed only low levels of antibodies. The findings indicate that the ELISA used in the present study employing partially characterized antigens has sensitivity and specificity to detect latex specific antibodies in the sera of suspected patients and can be used for presumptive diagnosis of latex allergy.

Allergens↗
PubMed1998

Diagnosis of natural rubber latex allergy: multicenter latex skin testing efficacy study. Multicenter Latex Skin Testing Study Task Force.

BACKGROUND: No characterized diagnostic natural rubber latex skin testing material is licensed for use in the United States. OBJECTIVE: We have conducted a multicenter clinical skin testing study to document the safety and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of a candidate Hevea brasiliensis nonammoniated latex (NAL) extract. These data are intended to support the licensing of this reagent for the diagnosis of latex allergy in high-risk populations. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-four subjects (304 adults and 20 children) were classified by their clinical history as having latex allergy (LA group, 124 adults and 10 children) or having no latex allergy (NLA group, 180 adults and 10 children). All subjects provided blood samples and then received sequential puncture skin tests (PSTs) at 1, 100, or 1000 microg/mL protein with a bifurcated needle and NAL (Greer Laboratories) from Malaysian Hevea brasiliensis (clone 600) sap. A 2-stage glove provocation test was used to clarify latex allergy status of individuals with positive history/negative PST result and negative history/positive PST result mismatches. RESULTS: Twenty-four subjects (15%) originally designated as having LA on the basis of their initial clinical history were reclassified to the NLA group on the basis of a negative glove provocation test result. Of the 134 subjects with LA, 54 (40%) were highly sensitive to latex, with a positive PST result at 1 microg/mL NAL. The Greer NAL reagent produced a positive PST rate (sensitivity) of 95% and 99% in subjects with LA at 100 microg/mL and 1 mg/mL, respectively. The negative PST rate (specificity) in 190 subjects with a negative history with the NAL extract at 100 microg/mL and 1 mg/mL, was 100% and 96%, respectively. Immediately after the PST, mild systemic reactions (mainly pruritus) were recorded in 16.1 % of the adults in the LA group and 4.4% of the adults in the NLA group. No reactions required treatment with epinephrine. Only mild delayed reactions were observed in 9.6% (LA group) and 2.8% (NLA group) of subjects 24 to 48 hours after PST. Mean wheal and erythema diameters measured in the 10 children in the LA group with spina bifida at 100 microg/mL and 1 mg/mL were similar to those observed in the adults in the LA group, suggesting that children are not at increased risk for systemic reactions compared with adults. CONCLUSIONS: A suggestive clinical history is necessary but not sufficient for a definitive diagnosis of IgE-dependent latex allergy. These data support the safety and diagnostic efficacy of the Greer NAL, skin test reagent at 100 micro/mL and 1 mg/mL for confirmatory PSTs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Early exposure to latex products mediates latex sensitization in spina bifida but not in other diseases with comparable latex exposure rates.

BACKGROUND: The high prevalence of latex sensitization in patients with spina bifida (SB) has been attributed to repeated and early exposure to latex products. Other diseases such as gastroschisis/omphalocoele and post-haemorrhagic/congenital hydrocephalus are also associated with repeated and early latex exposure. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the high prevalence of latex sensitization in patients with SB is rather related to the underlying disease itself than to disease-associated known risk factors. METHODS: We compared children with SB (n=35), children with gastroschisis/omphalocoele (G/O, n=20) and children with post-haemorrhagic/congenital hydrocephalus (PH, n=45). All children with SB and PH had a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt since a very young age. Patients who underwent three or less surgical procedures matched in terms of age, number of operations, atopy and gender distribution, and were analysed for IgE sensitization rates to latex. RESULTS: In the SB group, 16 of 35 patients (46%) showed elevated latex-specific IgE antibodies in contrast to one of 20 patients (5%) in the G/O group and four of 45 patients (8.9%) in the PH group (P<0.0005 and P<0.005, Fisher's exact test). Comparing matched control groups (<or=3 operations), the effects remained significant (P<0.05 and P<0.01). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the SB population bears a disease-associated propensity for latex sensitization. This effect cannot be explained exclusively by a higher number of operations and differences related to atopy, age or gender.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Reduction of latex aeroallergens and latex-specific IgE antibodies in sensitized workers after removal of powdered natural rubber latex gloves in a hospital.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory symptoms of natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy in health care workers (HCWs) have been reported in rooms with a detectable allergen load. Preventive measures have been proposed to reduce the risk of NRL sensitization. OBJECTIVES: Eliminating powdered NRL gloves from the workplace and giving NRL-free material to sensitized workers has been among proposed preventive measures. To appraise the success of such procedures among HCWs, a prospective study was carried out. METHODS: Sensitization of HCWs to NRL was determined by skin prick tests and measurements of specific IgE antibodies. NRL allergen concentrations in room air were measured before and after substitution of powdered NRL gloves with powder-free or synthetic gloves in different departments of a hospital and determined by a competitive inhibition immunoassay. RESULTS: The prevalence of HCWs with positive skin prick test responses and NRL-specific IgE-positive HCWs was 8% (n = 7) among the 90 examined staff members before the intervention started. All 7 reported glove-related allergic symptoms. Six of 7 sensitized subjects had a significant decrease of latex-specific IgE antibody concentrations during follow-up examinations in April and September 1997 (P <.003). Within 24 hours after substitution took place, NRL aeroallergen levels (up to 49.9 ng/m3) fell below the detection limit in areas with synthetic gloves or powder-free NRL gloves alike. Use of asthma medication and antiallergic drugs could be discontinued by 2 HCWs with NRL-related respiratory tract symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that elimination of powdered NRL gloves is a useful device in reducing aerogen NRL allergen loads below the detection limit and permitting sensitized or allergic personnel to remain on the job.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Lymphocyte proliferation response to extracts from different latex materials and to the purified latex allergen Hev b 1 (rubber elongation factor).

BACKGROUND: Type I allergy to latex is a growing problem, especially among health care workers. A detailed study of the peripheral blood cell responses to latex allergens has not been reported. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients and healthy subjects were isolated and stimulated with protein extracts from latex sap and latex gloves and the purified latex allergen Hev b 1 (rubber elongation factor) at different concentrations to determine the antigen-specific proliferation response. The examined patients were sensitized to latex by occupational exposure (n = 23) and had rhinitis, conjunctivitis, contact urticaria, and/or asthma. Two control groups of nonsensitized subjects were studied: one occupationally exposed to latex (n = 8), and the second, not exposed to latex (n = 8). RESULTS: In general, only latex-exposed subjects responded to the different latex antigen preparations. Lymphocyte proliferation responses to latex sap extract were found in 65% of latex-sensitized subjects and in 37.5% of the latex-exposed healthy subjects. Latex glove extract induced a significant proliferative responses in 47.8% of latex-sensitized patients and in 25% of the latex-exposed individuals. Hev b 1 induced lymphocyte proliferation responses in 52% of the latex-sensitized patients and in 25% of the latex-exposed subjects indicating that Hev b 1 is relevant antigen in these latex-sensitized and latex-exposed groups. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 39.1% of the latex-sensitized subjects responded to all three allergen preparations (latex sap and latex glove extract, as well as Hev b 1). We could find no correlation between latex-specific IgE level and latex-induced lymphocyte proliferation response. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the 14 kd protein Hev b 1 is a relevant allergen in health care workers. It can be detected by specific IgE antibodies to Hev b 1, as well as in lymphocyte proliferation assay. In addition, our study suggests that antigen-specific proliferation response to latex is associated with exposure to latex, but not with the level of specific latex IgE. This may be useful for the evaluation and prediction of latex hypersensitivity development.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Latex allergy and latex-fruit syndrome among medical workers in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Latex allergy is a serious occupational health problem among medical workers, but there are few data regarding its incidence and clinical characteristics in Taiwan. No data on the latex-fruit syndrome in Taiwan have been reported. This study investigated the prevalence of both latex allergy and latex-fruit syndrome, and risk factors for the development of latex allergy among medical workers. METHODS: A total of 302 medical workers who had daily contact with latex gloves during work at three hospitals in central Taiwan were interviewed and screened by questionnaire to detect allergic reactions to latex. Those with a history of immediate allergic reaction to latex gloves were screened for specific IgE antibodies against latex. Subjects whose screening results were positive were considered to have immediate latex allergy. Latex-fruit syndrome was defined as a clinical condition that manifested as immediate allergic reactions to both latex and fruit. RESULTS: Twenty-six (8.6%) medical workers had immediate allergic reactions to latex. The severity of latex allergy was correlated to the serum level of latex-specific IgE. Seven subjects with latex allergy (26.9%) had latex-fruit syndrome. Risk factors for development of latex allergy among medical workers were latex glove-related hand dermatitis, fruit allergy, preexisting atopic disease, hospital employment for more than 2 years, and total exposure to latex gloves of more than 9,000 hours. CONCLUSION: Latex allergy is an underrecognized occupational health problem in Taiwan. Early identification of medical workers at high risk is important so that they can be advised to use non-latex gloves as early as possible to prevent further sensitization to latex proteins.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Assessment of IgE allergen specificity among latex-allergic health care workers: review of IgE-binding components of various latex extracts.

BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to natural rubber latex have increased during the past 10 years, especially in many health care workers who have high exposure to latex allergens both by direct skin contact and by inhalation of latex particles from powdered gloves. Development of satisfactory diagnostic methods to verify the presence of latex allergy in health care workers requires characterization of the immunoreactive proteins in latex products and identification of specific IgE antibodies in sensitized patients. A number of different latex preparations are now available for in vitro evaluations. OBJECTIVES: Utilizing different in vitro methods, this study examines IgE sensitization to components of latex in a selected population of hospital employees, employing a raw natural latex glove extract and various commercial latex extracts. METHODS: Two hundred hospital employees exposed to latex were evaluated using an allergy history questionnaire. To further identify sensitized patients, two different specific IgE tests and leukocyte histamine release tests were performed using a panel of latex extracts obtained from different manufacturers. Sodium dodecylsulfate polyacrylamide electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) profiles were obtained. Sera from 34 subjects suspected to be latex-sensitized were IgE immunoblotted to assess the presence of IgE antibodies directed toward specific latex proteins. RESULTS: Thirty-four participants (17%) were considered sensitized to latex by a positive clinical history in conjunction with positive specific IgE tests (18 individuals) and/or positive histamine release tests (26 individuals). Significant extract differences in both the histamine release response profile and the frequency of positive test results were noted in the histamine release test. Significant individual differences in patients' latex epitope-specificity were found by IgE immunoblotting, substantiated by sodium dodecylsulfate polyacrylamide profiles revealing differences in protein band patterns among the various extracts. The IgE immunoblots indicated that the majority of patients reacted to proteins with molecular weights of 14, 21, 30 to 35, and 42 kD; the 30 to 35 kD protein being predominant. Seven subjects (22%) of the 34 considered to be latex-sensitized did not reveal binding of specific IgE in immunoblots. One latex extract (Stallergene) with the widest IgE-reacting protein repertoire identified the majority of subjects (63%) as latex sensitive by leukocyte histamine release and also provided the best quantitative histamine release test results. CONCLUSION: Only by testing with a combination of latex extracts were all sensitized individuals identified. This study demonstrates that currently several in vitro methods may be necessary to detect IgE sensitization to latex. Latex extracts to be employed in future skin tests must contain a wide epitope repertoire of IgE-binding proteins to identify all latex-sensitized individuals.

Allergens↗
PubMed1998

Latex allergy and latex sensitization in children and adolescents with meningomyelocele.

BACKGROUND: The high prevalence of clinical latex allergy and latex sensitization in children with meningomyelocele has been widely reported. It has also been noted that these same children have a higher than expected prevalence of atopic disease. It would be useful to have a safe, sensitive, and specific skin test to detect latex sensitivity and to know how well this test compares with available in vitro tests. It would likewise be helpful to know as fully as possible the characteristics of the individual and to evaluate the relative importance of factors suspected to contribute to clinical latex allergy and latex sensitization in this population. METHODS: A group of 116 children and adolescents 1 to 20 years of age were recruited for the study. An extensive history of latex allergy, atopic diseases, and surgical procedures was taken on all subjects. Each subject had either a latex skin test or an in vitro study for latex-specific IgE, and 67 subjects had both tests simultaneously. Eighty-five subjects had epicutaneous skin tests to a panel of environmental allergens. RESULTS: Overall, 25 of 116 (21.5%) subjects had a history of clinical latex allergy, and 51 of 116 (44%) were sensitized to latex. The sensitivity and specificity of skin tests for clinical latex allergy were slightly greater than for the in vitro test (100% vs 95.8% and 82.3% vs 68.9%, respectively). The positive predictive value and negative predictive value of skin testing for clinical latex allergy were also greater (67.6% vs 50% and 100% vs 98.1%, respectively). Age was found to be a significant variable for both latex allergy and latex sensitization. The number of surgical procedures undergone and the presence of positive skin test responses to environmental allergens were significantly correlated with latex sensitization but not with clinical allergy to latex. CONCLUSIONS: A sensitive, specific, and safe skin test for latex sensitivity appears superior to in vitro testing for latex allergy. Age, number of surgical procedures, and the presence of positive allergen skin test responses are significantly correlated with latex sensitization. Age alone is significantly correlated with clinical allergy to latex.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

In vitro assessment of the mechanical properties of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics.

The increased incidence of latex allergies has led to the development of non-latex orthodontic products. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics. The elastics tested were from 2 manufacturers (GAC and Masel) and made of 2 materials (latex and non-latex). The properties tested included cross-sectional area, breaking force, peak load, peak stress, stiffness, modulus, hysteresis, and 24-hour load relaxation. The data were analyzed with 1-sample t tests, an analysis of variance, and the Fisher PLSD test. Between GAC and Masel, the GAC non-latex elastics had greater breaking forces than did the Masel non-latex elastics. The Masel latex elastics had greater breaking forces than did the Masel non-latex elastics. The GAC non-latex elastics showed more viscoelastic properties than both the GAC latex elastics and the Masel non-latex elastics; however, the Masel elastics were more viscoelastic than the GAC elastics. Forces generated by the elastics decreased over 24 hours to an average load approximating 75% of the manufacturers' values (GAC latex, Masel latex, and Masel non-latex elastics) and to 60% for the GAC non-latex elastics. The mechanical properties of the non-latex elastics were not comparable to those of the latex elastics. Therefore, the clinical choice of elastics should be based on the patient's medical history and the specific mechanical properties of the type of elastic.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1999

Risk factors for latex allergy in patients with spina bifida and latex sensitization.

BACKGROUND: Some subjects with spina bifida (SB) and latex sensitization (cutaneous and/or serum IgE) can have clinical reactions, while others may have no symptoms after the exposure to latex products. OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to determine the risk factors associated with latex allergy in patients affected with SB and latex sensitization. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive subjects affected with SB, besides answering a questionnaire, underwent a skin-prick test (SPT) to latex and the determination of the specific serum IgE (RAST CAP) to latex. The total serum IgE concentration was determined and SPT to common aero- and food-allergens, skin tests (prick + prick) with fresh foods (kiwi, pear, orange, pineapple, tomato, banana) and RAST CAP to the same foods tested by the prick + prick technique, were also performed. RESULTS: Fifteen out of the 59 subjects (25%) were sensitized to latex according to the presence of IgE to latex detected by SPT (nine patients) and/or RAST CAP (13 patients). Five out of the 15 sensitized patients (33%) suffered from clinical reactions to latex (urticaria, conjunctivitis, angioedema, rhinitis, bronchial asthma) while they were using latex gloves and while inflating latex balloons. In the 15 sensitized patients, the presence of specific latex seric IgE > 3.5 kU/L (>/= class 3), a positive latex SPT, an elevated total serum IgE, and a positive prick + prick and/or a positive RAST CAP to foods, were significant (P < 0.05) risk factors associated with latex symptoms. The other factors tested (age, gender, months of intermittent bladder catheterization, surgical procedures, SPT reactivity and clinical reactions to aero-allergens and food-allergens, skin tests for fresh foods, positive RAST CAP to foods) were not significantly different in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSION: Significant risk factors for symptoms to latex in patients with SB and latex sensitization were a presence of specific IgE to latex > 3.5 kU/L, a more frequent positive latex SPT, elevated total IgE, and one or more positive prick + prick and/or RAST CAP to fresh foods.

Adolescent↗