Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Language Tests”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

The use of two language tests to identify pragmatic language problems in children with autism spectrum disorders.

PURPOSE: Pragmatic language disorders (PLDs) are difficult to diagnose in a cost-effective manner, and there are few assessment tools that yield quantitative data. This investigation was designed to determine whether two formal assessment tools would differentiate PLDs in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) from controls matched on verbal IQ and language fundamentals. METHOD: Thirty-four matched participants were given the Test of Pragmatic Language (TOPL; D. Phelps-Terasaki & T. Phelps-Gunn, 1992) and the Strong Narrative Assessment Procedure (SNAP; C. J. Strong, 1998). RESULTS: Participants with ASDs had significantly poorer scores than controls on the TOPL. On the SNAP, the children with ASDs performed similarly to controls on syntax, cohesion, story grammar, and completeness of episodes. The controls performed significantly better only on the ability to answer inferential questions. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The TOPL was effective in differentiating PLDs in children with ASDs when performance was compared tomatched controls. The SNAP did not clearly differentiatelanguage problems in these two groups. Research is needed to develop formal assessment tools that target the unique language disabilities of high-functioning individuals with ASDs.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Differentiating dialect from disorder: a comparison of two processing tasks and a standardized language test.

UNLABELLED: Previous research has indicated that norm-referenced language assessment protocols are often biased against dialectal speakers. Recently, the use of processing tasks has emerged as one possible means of reducing this bias in language testing. Processing tasks measure a child's ability to process and manipulate language rather than tap previous linguistic knowledge. The present study utilized 40 subjects between the ages of 7;0 and 7;3 in the following equal groupings: White normal language, White language impaired, African American normal language, African American language impaired. The subjects were administered the Test of Language Development-2P (TOLD-2P), the Nonword Repetition Task (NRT), and the Competing Language Processing Task (CLPT). Results indicated that all three measures differentiated normal-language and language-impaired subjects from one another. With regard to cultural group, confirmed speakers of African American English (AAE) with normal language scored significantly lower on the TOLD-2P compared to White normal-language subjects. Scores of the AAE-speaking subjects with normal language on the NRT and CLPT, however, did not differ significantly from the White normal-language subjects. These results suggest that AAE speakers with normally developing language (LN) may be at a disadvantage on tests of prior language knowledge and that processing tasks may be a useful tool in combination with other assessment measures to make less biased clinical decisions. EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES: As a result of this activity, the reader will (1) be able to determine the utility of processing tasks in culturally unbiased language assessment. (2) The reader will be able to discriminate the difference between the results of a standardized language test and processing tasks on speakers of AAE.

Child↗
PubMed1996

A study on simplification of the Standard Language Test of Aphasia (SLTA).

The Standard Language Test of Aphasia (STLA) was developed for classification and evaluation of severity of aphasia of Japanese speakers in 1975. Now it has become the most reliable test for patient with aphasic condition in Japan. However, the test involves many tasks and assessment is rather complicated. A simplified display of aphasic conditions was created by means of statistical analysis of the features of types of aphasia in order to reduce time and labor involved in SLTA for bed side use. Data were collected from 198 patients, including 40 patients with Broca aphasia (17 severe and 23 moderate cases), 64 patients with Wernicke aphasia (28 severe and 36 moderate cases) and 94 patients with global aphasia (68 severe and 26 moderate cases). A test with simplfied aphasia pattern involved naming objects for daily use (represented by pictures), pronunciation of words written in Kanji (Chinese characters) and in Kana (syllabary), pronunciation of single Kana, dictation of single Kana (oral presentation), repeating simple words presented by the examiner, dictation of words to be written in Kanji (oral presentation), matching words in Kana and a picture (pointing), writing words in Kanji (represented by pictures), writing words in Kana (represented by pictures), and auditory comprehension of words.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Assessing children with language tests--which tests to use?

A group of 28 children attending a unit for children with developmental language disorders was assessed on a battery of cognitive and language tests. No relationship was found between verbal IQ and scores on other language measures. However, although correlations between the specialist language tests used were highly significant, the mean age scores obtained on the different tests were found to vary by as much as 2 years. The implications of these findings for clinical and experimental studies of children with language impairments are discussed.

Child↗
PubMed1990

A comparison of the SSW and language test results.

The purpose of this paper is to determine the relationship between the SSW and a battery of auditory-language tests in a group of children suspected of auditory processing problems. Thirty-one children between the ages of 6.2 and 10.4 were referred by their classroom teachers. All children were administered a pure tone and an acoustic immittance battery, the SSW test, selected subtests of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Functions, the Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock Auditory Skills Battery, an elicited language sample, and the Observational Profile of Classroom Communication. No significant correlations were found between the SSW right competing and left competing conditions and the auditory-language test battery. The findings suggest that these two test approaches measure different aspects of auditory processing abilities in children, and both are required to adequately describe auditory processing abilities at all levels.

Attention↗
PubMed1999

Cross-language tests of hemispheric strategies in reading nonwords.

Four experiments explored the effects of specific language characteristics on hemispheric functioning in reading nonwords using a lateralized trigram identification task. Previous research using nonsense consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) trigrams has shown that total error scores reveal a right visual field (RVF) advantage in Hebrew, Japanese, and English. Qualitative error patterns have shown that the right hemisphere uses a sequential strategy, whereas the left hemisphere uses a more parallel strategy in English but shows the opposite pattern in Hebrew. Experiment 1 tested whether this is due to the test language or to the native language of the participants. Results showed that native language had a stronger effect on hemispheric strategies than test language. Experiment 2 showed that latency to target letters in the CVCs revealed the same asymmetry as qualitative errors for Hebrew speakers but not for English speakers and that exposure duration of the stimuli affected misses differentially according to letter position. Experiment 3 used number trigrams to equate reading conventions in the 2 languages. Qualitative error scores still revealed opposing asymmetry patterns. Experiments 1-3 used vertical presentations. Experiment 4 used horizontal presentation, which eliminated sequential processing in both hemispheres in Hebrew speakers, whereas English speakers still showed sequential processing in both hemispheres. Comparison of the 2 presentations suggests that stimulus arrangement affected qualitative errors in the left visual field but not the RVF for English speakers and in both visual fields for Hebrew speakers. It is suggested that these differences result from orthographic and morphological differences between the languages: Reading Hebrew requires attention to be deployed to all the constituents of the stimulus in parallel, whereas reading English allows sequential processing of the letters in both hemispheres. Implications of cross-language studies for models of hemispheric function are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1975

The Stycar language test.

The principles and practical application of the STYCAR Developmental Language Test are briefly described. The test, which is one of the STYCAR series (Sheridan Tests for Young Children and Retardates, Sheridan 1973), consists of three widely overlapping testing procedures i.e. the Common Objects Test (one to two years), the Miniature Toys Test (21 months to 4 1/2 years) and the Picture-book Test (2 1/2 to seven years). The picture-book includes lists of speech sounds, words and sentences for recognition and repetition, to detect and define difficulties of auditory discrimination, articulation and sequencing of sounds. The tests are designed to provide the examiner with considerable choice in individual application, but differential diagnosis calls for experienced clinical judgement. Since the tests are not intended to produce pass/fail results, descriptive recording and clinical assessment on a three- or five-point scale is recommended.

Child↗
PubMed2005

Diagnostic accuracy of the structured photographic expressive language test: third edition (SPELT-3).

PURPOSE: This study examined the empirical evidence for using the Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test: Third Edition (SPELT-3; Dawson, Stout, & Eyer, 2003) to diagnose language impairment in preschool children. The SPELT-3 is a revision of the SPELT-II (Werner & Kresheck, 1983), which has been proven in the past to have high levels of discriminant accuracy in identifying preschoolers with language impairment. METHOD: Forty-two 4- and 5-year-old children with a specific language impairment (SLI) and 43 children with typically developing (TD) language abilities were studied to determine the classification accuracy and other aspects of validity for the SPELT-3. RESULTS: Results from both an exploratory and a confirmatory sample indicated 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity when a cutoff standard score of 95 was applied to the data. In addition, use of the SPELT-3 was supported by additional data on convergent and divergent aspects of validity. IMPLICATIONS: The data provide empirical support for the use of the SPELT-3 for the purpose of differentiating between children with normal language and those with impaired language.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1981

Black English responses on selected language tests.

Standardized screening and assessment measures for language development do not take into account Black English responses. This study was designed to determine the extent to which normal and language impaired black preschool children respond in Black English and Standard English on selected screening instruments. Developmental differences in the usage of Standard English and Black English were also investigated. The results indicate that black normal and language impaired preschool children are both Standard English and Black English on screening tests. Developmental differences were noted. The results suggest that tests for language development need to be standardized on speakers of Black English and also should include Black English response alternatives.

Black or African American↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Language test].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Child↗