[Function tests. II. Liver function tests].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Measuring monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) formation after intravenous administration of lidocaine in potential organ donors (MEGX test) has been advocated as a useful test to select donor livers for transplantation, but some groups have demonstrated a low test efficacy. We, therefore, investigated the value of an extended MEGX formation test and the value of other dynamic liver function tests, in selecting suitable human donor livers. In 51 human multi-organ donors, we measured elimination of galactose, indocyanine green, and lidocaine, as well as formation of MEGX, at 15, 30, and 60 min after administration of the test substances. In the early postoperative period, the function of the transplanted liver was then classified as good or poor, as defined by a prothrombin time above or below 65% by day 4 and fibrinogen concentration above or below 300 mg/dl by day 7. Donor characteristics and preservation modalities were very similar between the two groups. Galactose, indocyanine green, and lidocaine metabolism failed to predict good or poor graft function in the early postoperative period. MEGX serum concentrations, however, were significantly higher in the group of donors whose organs functioned well in the recipients, as compared with donors whose organs functioned poorly in the recipients. This was true for MEGX concentrations at 15 min (117+/-9 vs. 90+/-9 ng/ml; P=0.03), 30 min (108+/-8 vs. 86+/-8 ng/ml; P=0.04), and 60 min (100+/-6 vs. 73+/-5 ng/ml; P=0.006). Extending the MEGX formation test from 15 to 60 min improved test efficacy. Maximal MEGX concentration in 9 or up to 12 consecutive blood samples, drawn between 3 and 120 min after lidocaine infusion, was also significantly higher in donors whose organs functioned well, than in donors whose organs functioned poorly (129+/-10 vs. 101+/-10 ng/ml; P=0.03). Although the groups with good and poor organ function differed significantly with respect to their MEGX serum concentrations, and although efficacy of the MEGX test was improved by extending the test from 15 to 60 min, the overlap in individual MEGX serum concentrations was still so wide that it is virtually impossible to predict early graft function only on the basis of the MEGX test in the donor. Therefore, the MEGX test, although of potential scientific interest, does not predict early graft function with an accuracy necessary for clinical use.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The liver function tests are basic tools in the assessment of liver disease, they supply information about severity, progression of the illness and help to discriminate among treatment options. They are divided into two sections: biochemical test of liver function per se and serum markers of hepatobiliary disease. Although there are no new tests, liver transplant programs have stimulated development of metabolic capacity measurements to estimate liver function. At present the liver function tests, still are the best method to assess patients with liver diseases.
Liver function tests, liver scintigraphy and peritoneoscopy were carried out in 240 patients with carcinoma. Hepatic invasion was demonstrated by peritoneoscopy essentially when both of the other tests were positive. However, in one-third of the patients, peritoneoscopy revealed the presence of other pathologic changes which could account for the positivity of either of the other diagnostic procedures. The status of the liver, with regard to presence or absence of metastases, could be microscopically documented in 59 patients. False-negative findings of liver chemistry tests, liver scan and peritoneoscopy were seen in 27, 42 and 36 per cent, respectively, of the patients while the rate of false-positive results was 15, 10 and 3 per cent, respectively. The rate of false-negative peritoneoscopy examinations in the absence of simultaneous positivey of the two other investigations was insignificant. These data indicate that liver chemistry tests, liver scan and peritoneoscopy play a major and complementary role in the screening of patients with carcinoma.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A child with Wilm's tumor and a child with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) were each noted to have persistent elevations of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Both children underwent thorough evaluation for liver disease and, as a result, experienced delays in treatment of the Wilm's tumor and ITP. Eventually both children were found to have extremely elevated serum creatine kinase (CK). Muscle biopsy confirmed diagnoses of Duchenne's muscular dystrophy in one child, and Becker's muscular dystrophy in the second. Hematologists/oncologists should consider obtaining a serum CK to rule out muscle disease in patients with unexplained elevations of AST, ALT, and LDH.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The advantages and disadvantages of using monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX), the major metabolite of lidocaine, as a probe of hepatic function in liver transplantation are reviewed. A 'real time' test of liver function should give a measure of current hepatocellular capacity rather than reflect past damage. The hepatic metabolism of lidocaine to MEGX is the basis of a flow-dependent dynamic test of liver function. In pre-transplantation patients, data from this MEGX test support its role in assessing the risk of morbidity and mortality. In assessing the liver transplant donor, there are differences concerning its apparent usefulness and these must be resolved. In the liver transplant recipient, this MEGX test is also useful for measuring real-time hepatic metabolizing activity, and low MEGX values reflect the clinical condition of the patient. At present, however, this test has several limitations. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation, not only by the MEGX test but also by a combination of other conventional liver function tests (biochemical parameters, etc.), or with histological evaluation, is thought to be desirable for deciding whether a liver transplantation should be carried out or not.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.