Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “LDL-cholesterol”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

LDLR Variant Classification Through Activity-Normalized Prime Editing Screening.

BACKGROUND: Inherited variants in the LDL (low-density lipoprotein) receptor (LDLR) gene are the most common cause of familial hypercholesterolemia, significantly increasing coronary artery disease risk. Early identification of pathogenic LDLR variants enables prompt lipid-lowering therapy and cascade testing of at-risk relatives; however, most LDLR variants observed in the population have uncertain or absent clinical classifications, leaving many patients without actionable information. METHODS: We developed the first activity-normalized prime editing screening pipeline to measure the impact of 5184 LDLR coding variants on LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) uptake. Each prime editing guide RNA is paired with a genotypic outcome reporter to correct for variable editing efficiency, overcoming a key limitation of previous pooled genome editing screens. A statistical framework further improves variant effect estimates by jointly analyzing all missense variants at each amino acid position. RESULTS: We show that prime editing of the reporter construct correlates with endogenous variant installation frequency, validating the activity normalization approach. The resulting scores capture a continuous spectrum of functional effects, robustly separate pathogenic versus benign ClinVar variants, and show concordance with LDL-C levels in UK Biobank participants. We calibrate functional evidence strengths to the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation framework, enabling integration into a clinical variant classification workflow. By combining functional, computational, population, and contextual evidence, 322 of 434 LDLR variants currently classified as variants of uncertain significance, conflicting, or absent from ClinVar appear to meet evidence thresholds for reclassification and can be prioritized for expert review, substantially expanding the pool of actionable variant classifications. The screen also reveals a cluster of gain-of-function variants in LDLR class A repeat 5, at least some of which enhance LDL-C uptake through increased apolipoprotein B interaction, with implications for therapeutic genome editing. Last, prime editing uniquely detects splice-altering coding variants missed by cDNA-based screens and pathogenicity predictors, revealing an advantage of endogenous variant installation. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, activity-normalized prime editing provides a scalable framework for LDLR variant classification that substantially expands the proportion of variants with evidence for genetic diagnosis and reveals novel biology with therapeutic relevance.

CRISPR screening

Parental longevity and polygenic longevity scores in relation to ageing-related factors in a population of 70-year-olds followed over six years: The Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Study.

As societies age, a deeper understanding of ageing-related factors that contribute to longevity is needed. We therefore investigated possible longevity factors (social, medical, and biological) in relation to parental longevity (PL) and polygenic longevity scores (PGLSs). We examined 1126 70-year-olds from the Swedish population-based Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort study in 2014-2016 (response rate 72%), with follow-up in 2019-2022 (response rate 77.6%). Comprehensive examinations included self-reported information on parents' ages, socioeconomic factors, mental, cardiovascular, and neurological health, anthropometry, laboratory data, and genotyping to construct two continuous PGLSs variables (with and without the APOE locus). PL groups were categorised as high if both parents survived to age 85 (17.2%); medium if one parent had survived (43.3%), and low if neither parent had survived to age 85 (39.4%). Higher PL and higher PGLSs were related to less hypertension, higher educational level, better childhood, and current socioeconomic status. In addition, higher PL was associated with higher MMSE score, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol (HDL-c) and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c), lower BMI, homocysteine and inflammatory markers (IL-6, CRP) levels, and less smoking, whereas higher PGLSs was related to less myocardial infarction. At follow-up, high-PL was associated with less increase in plasma pTau217. PGLSs were mainly related to socioeconomic and cardiovascular factors, while individuals with long-lived parents, in addition, had several other characteristics of longevity, such as less inflammation, homocysteine, and markers of dementia. PL may be a proxy for biological ageing and used as a screening for ageing-related disorders in the context of prevention.

APOE

GWAS of CRP response to statins further supports the role of APOE in statin response: A GIST consortium study.

Statins are first-line treatments in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Clinical studies show statins act independently of lipid-lowering mechanisms to decrease C-reactive protein (CRP), an inflammation marker. We aim to elucidate genetic loci associated with CRP statin response. CRP statin response is the change in log-CRP between off-treatment and on-treatment measurements. Cohort-level Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) of CRP response were performed using 1000 Genomes imputed data, testing &#x223c;10 million common genetic variants. GWAS meta-analysis combined results from seven cohorts and clinical trials totalling 14,070 statin-treated individuals of European ancestry within the GIST consortium. Secondary analyses included statin-by-placebo interaction analyses, and lookups in African ancestry cohorts. Our GWAS identified two genome-wide significant (P&#x202f;<&#x202f;5e-8) loci: APOE and HNF1A for CRP statin response corrected for baseline CRP. The missense lead variant rs429358 at APOE, contributing to the APOE-E4 haplotype, is a risk locus for dyslipidaemia, Alzheimer's and coronary artery disease (CAD). The HNF1A locus is associated with diabetes, cholesterol levels, and CAD. Both loci are also associated with baseline CRP levels, and neither locus achieved a significant (P&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.05) result from the statin v. placebo interaction meta-analysis using randomized clinical trial data. However, the interaction result (P-int=0.09) for APOE was suggestive and possibly underpowered. The APOE-E4 signal may therefore be associated with both CRP and LDL-cholesterol statin response. Combined with suggestions in the literature that APOE also leads to differential statin benefit in Alzheimer's, the APOE locus warrants further investigation for potential genetic effects on healthcare with statin treatment.

Humans

Robust pleiotropy-decomposed polygenic scores identify distinct contributions to elevated coronary artery disease polygenic risk.

BACKGROUND: Polygenic risk score (PRS) have proved to offer robust risk prediction for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the global CAD PRS summarizes the joint effects of all the markers in the genome, masking potential genetic heterogeneity that may be important for disease interpretation and targeted interventions. METHODS: Using summary-level data, we identified 43 significant CAD-related traits based on genetic correlations, and further classified them into eight pleiotropy clusters based on their biological functions. We then partitioned the genome into 2,353 near-independent regions. Variants in each region were assigned to the trait most genetically similar to CAD, and then were labeled with the corresponding pleiotropy cluster. We grouped variants without labels into a ninth, non-specific cluster. The Pleiotropy Decomposed (PD) PRSs for each of the nine clusters were calculated using variants assigned to each cluster for 407,903 samples of European ancestry from the UK Biobank (UKBB). RESULTS: We decomposed the CAD PRS into nine PD-PRSs and further stratified individuals with high CAD-PRS into nine subgroups. Each PD-PRS accounted for a higher proportion of the global CAD-PRS within its corresponding subgroup than in the remaining subjects with high CAD-PRS (e.g., 25.2% (0.07) vs. 10.06% (0.07) for lipids-PD-PRS). Additionally, these subgroups showed distinct clinical features. For example, in the lipids-related subgroup, lipoprotein(a) and LDL-cholesterol levels were 67.5% and 18.3% higher, respectively, compared to the remaining high-risk individuals. Furthermore, significant interactions were observed between blood pressure and BP PD-PRS, and between current smoking and respiratory system PD-PRS. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that PD-PRSs may reveal substantial genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity among individuals with high CAD-PRS. The unique PD-PRS compositions of each individual can highlight the relative importance of different pleiotropic regions.

Humans

Lipoprotein(a): Actionable today, treatable tomorrow?

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an atherogenic, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle whose concentrations, mostly genetically determined, are elevated in about 20%&#xa0;of individuals. It is a major and under-recognised independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic valve stenosis. OBJECTIVE: To review current evidence, international recommendations and future directions around testing and management of elevated Lp(a). DISCUSSION: Among other high-risk groups, measuring Lp(a) is recommended in people with ASCVD or aortic valve stenosis, especially if they are of young-onset, familial, unusually severe or progressive. Indeed, some international guidelines advocate measuring Lp(a) in all adults as part of cardiovascular risk assessment. While&#xa0;specific Lp(a)-lowering therapies are not yet available, risk-reducing measures for people with raised Lp(a) include addressing absolute ASCVD risk by diet and&#xa0;lifestyle measures, along with pharmacological LDL-cholesterol reduction. Aspirin might also have a role in primary prevention. Lp(a)-lowering therapies that act by&#xa0;preventing its formation are the subjects of ongoing clinical trials focused on cardiovascular outcomes, the&#xa0;first&#xa0;of which is expected to report in late 2026.

Humans