Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “L1 retrotransposons”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Biology of mammalian L1 retrotransposons.

L1 retrotransposons comprise 17% of the human genome. Although most L1s are inactive, some elements remain capable of retrotransposition. L1 elements have a long evolutionary history dating to the beginnings of eukaryotic existence. Although many aspects of their retrotransposition mechanism remain poorly understood, they likely integrate into genomic DNA by a process called target primed reverse transcription. L1s have shaped mammalian genomes through a number of mechanisms. First, they have greatly expanded the genome both by their own retrotransposition and by providing the machinery necessary for the retrotransposition of other mobile elements, such as Alus. Second, they have shuffled non-L1 sequence throughout the genome by a process termed transduction. Third, they have affected gene expression by a number of mechanisms. For instance, they occasionally insert into genes and cause disease both in humans and in mice. L1 elements have proven useful as phylogenetic markers and may find other practical applications in gene discovery following insertional mutagenesis in mice and in the delivery of therapeutic genes.

Animals↗

The recent evolution of human L1 retrotransposons.

L1 elements are the most successful retrotransposons in mammals and are responsible for at least 30% of human DNA. Far from being indolent genomic parasites, L1 elements have evolved and amplified rapidly during human evolution. Indeed during just the last 25 million years (MY) five distinct L1 families have emerged and generated tens of thousands of copies. The most recently evolved human specific L1 family is currently active and L1 copies have been accumulating in the human genome at about the same rate per generation as the currently active L1 families in Old World rats and mice. At times during the last 25 MY L1 activity constituted a significant enough genetic load to be subject to negative selection. During these same times, and in apparent response to the host, L1 underwent adaptive evolution. Understanding the molecular basis for these evolutionary changes should help illuminate one of the least understood but most important aspects of L1 biology, namely the extent and nature of the interaction between L1 and its host.

Evolution, Molecular↗

DNA release by line-1 (L1) retrotransposon. Could it be possible?

We have verified the presence of line-1 retrotransposon (L1) in plasma DNA in 15/17 brain tumor (glioma) patients and in 6/6 healthy people by applying PCR amplification of part of the L1 5' end. The same samples were separately amplified for K-ras. Results suggested that L1 sequences are circulating throughout the body. We hypothesized the participation of transposable elements such as L1 in a putative DNA release mechanism.

Adult↗

Many human genes are transcribed from the antisense promoter of L1 retrotransposon.

Human L1 retrotransposon has two transcription-regulatory regions: an internal or sense promoter driving transcription of the full-length L1, and an antisense promoter (ASP) driving transcription in the opposite direction into adjacent cellular sequences yielding chimeric transcripts. Both promoters are located in the 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) of L1. Chimeric transcripts derived from the L1 ASP are highly represented in expressed-sequence tag (EST) databases. Using a bioinformatics approach, we have characterized 10 chimeric ESTs (cESTs) derived from the EST division of GenBank. These cESTs contained 3' regions similar or identical to known cellular mRNA sequences. They were accurately spliced and preferentially expressed in tumor cell lines. Analysis of the hundreds of cESTs suggests that the L1 ASP-driven transcription is a common phenomenon not only for tumor cells but also for normal ones and may involve transcriptional interference or epigenetic control of different cellular genes.

5' Flanking Region↗

[Adequate system for investigation of translation initiation of the human retrotransposon L1 mRNA in vitro].

Retrotransposon L1 codes for a unique dicistronic mRNA which serves both a transposition intermediate and a template for the synthesis of two proteins of this mobile element. According to preliminary data, the translation initiation of both cistrons of L1 occurs by non-canonical mechanisms. When translating the L1 mRNA in rabbit reticulocyte lysate (RRL), a standard system routinely used by many researchers to study mechanisms of translation initiation in eukaryotes, we observed along with expected products a number of polypeptides resulted from aberrant initiation at internal AUG codons. Such products are absent on translation of L1 mRNA in vivo. Addition to the system of a cytoplasmic extract from HeLa cells resulted in disappearance of these abberant products whereas the efficiency of translation of the first cistron remained unchanged. The level of translation of the second cistron became significantly lower. This also made the picture closer to that observed in vivo. These and other experiments allowed us to clearly demonstrate that the new combined cell-free system is much more adequate to study mechanisms of translation initiation than a regular RRL.

Animals↗

Environmental factors affecting transcription of the human L1 retrotransposon. I. Steroid hormone-like agents.

The L1 retrotransposon has significantly shaped the structure of the human genome. At least 30% of human genome sequence can be attributed to L1 reverse transcriptase activity. There are 10(5) copies of the human L1 retrotransposon, L1Hs, most of which are defective, although approximately 8-9 x 10(3) are full length. L1Hs elements transpose through an RNA intermediate and transcription is thought to be the rate limiting step in retrotransposition. Because transcription of retrotransposons in a variety of organisms has been shown to respond to environmental stimuli, we investigated the influence of various agents on transcription from two different L1Hs promoters. The activity of the L1Hs promoters was analyzed by transfecting L1Hs-expressing cell lines with plasmids containing the L1Hs promoters fused to the LacZ reporter gene and monitoring expression with a beta-galactosidase assay. Small increases in beta-galactosidase activity were observed with both L1Hs promoters after treatment with serum, testosterone, dihydrotestosterone and organochloride pesticides, indicating that these agents can influence L1Hs transcription.

Base Sequence↗

[Study of functional L1 retrotransposon in human type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the susceptibility gene of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) through a novel strategy. METHODS: Firstly, the common feature of the putative susceptibility genes in the reported susceptibility loci was searched by using NCBI BLAST, and a functional L1 retrotransposon in the loci was found. Secondly, the mRNA expression level of the functional L1 retrotransposon in 25 Han T2DM patients and 22 normal controls was investigated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and statistical analysis was implemented in statistical package SPSS10.0. Thirdly, L1 retrotransponson genome mutation screening was performed via sequencing. RESULTS: Screening the human genome for the retrotransposon genome via alignment with the L1 genome using NCBI BLAST showed the functional L1 retrotransposons distribute on most chromosomes except for chromosomes 19, 21 and Y on which rare type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci were reported to reside, and their distribution sites are consistent with the locations of the reported candidate type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci. The mRNA expression level of the functional L1 retrotransposon in the T2DM patients was significantly lower than that in normal subjects (P<0.001). Nonsense mutations including deletion and/or point mutations were observed in all of the 6 T2DM patients tested, but no mutation was observed in all of the 4 normal controls tested. CONCLUSION: The functional L1 retrotransposon may be a candidate susceptibility gene of type 2 diabetes or a key regulator of the susceptibility genes, and it may be an ideal candidate biomarker for screening type 2 diabetes.

Adult↗

L1 retrotransposons in human cancers.

Retrotransposons like L1 are silenced in somatic cells by a variety of mechanisms acting at different levels. Protective mechanisms include DNA methylation and packaging into inactive chromatin to suppress transcription and prevent recombination, potentially supported by cytidine deaminase editing of RNA. Furthermore, DNA strand breaks arising during attempted retrotranspositions ought to activate cellular checkpoints, and L1 activation outside immunoprivileged sites may elicit immune responses. A number of observations indicate that L1 sequences nevertheless become reactivated in human cancer. Prominently, methylation of L1 sequences is diminished in many cancer types and full-length L1 RNAs become detectable, although strong expression is restricted to germ cell cancers. L1 elements have been found to be enriched at sites of illegitimate recombination in many cancers. In theory, lack of L1 repression in cancer might cause transcriptional deregulation, insertional mutations, DNA breaks, and an increased frequency of recombinations, contributing to genome disorganization, expression changes, and chromosomal instability. There is however little evidence that such effects occur at a gross scale in human cancers. Rather, as a rule, L1 repression is only partly alleviated. Unfortunately, many techniques commonly used to investigate genetic and epigenetic alterations in cancer cells are not well suited to detect subtle effects elicited by partial reactivation of retroelements like L1 which are present as abundant, but heterogeneous copies. Therefore, effects of L1 sequences exerted on the local chromatin structure, on the transcriptional regulation of individual genes, and on chromosome fragility need to be more closely investigated in normal and cancer cells.

Journal Article↗

A novel active L1 retrotransposon subfamily in the mouse.

Unlike human L1 retrotransposons, the 5' UTR of mouse L1 elements contains tandem repeats of approximately 200 bp in length called monomers. Multiple L1 subfamilies exist in the mouse which are distinguished by their monomer sequences. We previously described a young subfamily, called the T(F) subfamily, which contains approximately 1800 active elements among its 3000 full-length members. Here we characterize a novel subfamily of mouse L1 elements, G(F), which has unique monomer sequence and unusual patterns of monomer organization. A majority of these G(F) elements also have a unique length polymorphism in ORF1. Polymorphism analysis of G(F) elements in various mouse subspecies and laboratory strains revealed that, like T(F), the G(F) subfamily is young and expanding. About 1500 full-length G(F) elements exist in the diploid mouse genome and, based on the results of a cell culture assay, approximately 400 G(F) elements are potentially capable of retrotransposition. We also tested 14 A-type subfamily elements in the assay and estimate that about 900 active A elements may be present in the mouse genome. Thus, it is now known that there are three large active subfamilies of mouse L1s; T(F), A, and G(F), and that in total approximately 3000 full-length elements are potentially capable of active retrotransposition. This number is in great excess to the number of L1 elements thought to be active in the human genome.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

The impact of L1 retrotransposons on the human genome.

The 'master' human mobile element, the L1 retrotransposon, has come of age as a biological entity. Knowledge of how it retrotransposes in vivo, how its proteins act to retrotranspose other poly A elements and the extent of its role in shaping the human genome should emerge rapidly over the next few years. We review the impact of retrotransposons and how new insight is likely to lead to important practical applications for these intriguing mobile elements.

Genome, Human↗

A sensitive RNase protection assay to detect transcripts from potentially functional human endogenous L1 retrotransposons.

A high background of read-through transcripts from degenerate human L1 retrotransposons is present in almost all human cell types. This prevents the detection of RNA transcripts from potentially functional elements. To overcome this, we have developed an RNase protection assay based on the reconstructed consensus sequence for the 5' end of the major L1 family. In the human Ntera2D1 teratocarcinoma cell line, this assay readily detected L1 transcripts that were located primarily in the cytoplasm and where 20% were in filterable particles. By this assay, potentially functional L1 elements are also transcriptionally active in lymphocytes from some but not all normal individuals. Together with the full length protection product, there were three other discrete L1 RNAs, two of which (305 and 275 bases) were transcribed from the 5' end of the L1 element. These smaller L1 RNAs do not appear to be derived from transcripts from divergent L1 families but are either discrete shorter transcripts or specifically processed products from longer initial transcripts.

Animals↗

Transcriptional disruption by the L1 retrotransposon and implications for mammalian transcriptomes.

LINE-1 (L1) elements are the most abundant autonomous retrotransposons in the human genome, accounting for about 17% of human DNA. The L1 retrotransposon encodes two proteins, open reading frame (ORF)1 and the ORF2 endonuclease/reverse transcriptase. L1 RNA and ORF2 protein are difficult to detect in mammalian cells, even in the context of overexpression systems. Here we show that inserting L1 sequences on a transcript significantly decreases RNA expression and therefore protein expression. This decreased RNA concentration does not result from major effects on the transcription initiation rate or RNA stability. Rather, the poor L1 expression is primarily due to inadequate transcriptional elongation. Because L1 is an abundant and broadly distributed mobile element, the inhibition of transcriptional elongation by L1 might profoundly affect expression of endogenous human genes. We propose a model in which L1 affects gene expression genome-wide by acting as a 'molecular rheostat' of target genes. Bioinformatic data are consistent with the hypothesis that L1 can serve as an evolutionary fine-tuner of the human transcriptome.

Animals↗

Identifying related L1 retrotransposons by analyzing 3' transduced sequences.

BACKGROUND: A large fraction of the human genome is attributable to L1 retrotransposon sequences. Not only do L1s themselves make up a significant portion of the genome, but L1-encoded proteins are thought to be responsible for the transposition of other repetitive elements and processed pseudogenes. In addition, L1s can mobilize non-L1, 3'-flanking DNA in a process called 3' transduction. Using computational methods, we collected DNA sequences from the human genome for which we have high confidence of their mobilization through L1-mediated 3' transduction. RESULTS: The precursors of L1s with transduced sequence can often be identified, allowing us to reconstruct L1 element families in which a single parent L1 element begot many progeny L1s. Of the L1s exhibiting a sequence structure consistent with 3' transduction (L1 with transduction-derived sequence, L1-TD), the vast majority were located in duplicated regions of the genome and thus did not necessarily represent unique insertion events. Of the remaining L1-TDs, some lack a clear polyadenylation signal, but the alignment between the parent-progeny sequences nevertheless ends in an A-rich tract of DNA. CONCLUSIONS: Sequence data suggest that during the integration into the genome of RNA representing an L1-TD, reverse transcription may be primed internally at A-rich sequences that lie downstream of the L1 3' untranslated region. The occurrence of L1-mediated transduction in the human genome may be less frequent than previously thought, and an accurate estimate is confounded by the frequent occurrence of segmental genomic duplications.

Base Sequence↗

Asymmetric methylation in the hypermethylated CpG promoter region of the human L1 retrotransposon.

We have investigated the function and sequence specificity of DNA methylation in the hypermethylated CpG island promoter region of the endogenous human LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposon family. In nontransformed human embryonic fibroblasts, inhibition of DNA methylation with 5-azadeoxycytidine induced a greater than 4-fold increase in transcription from potentially functional L1 elements without increasing the transcription level of the majority of degenerate elements, implicating hypermethylation in the repression of L1 activity. Using bisulfite genomic sequencing to assess the pattern of methylation in a subset of nondegenerate L1 elements, we found 29 sites within a 460-base pair region of the noncoding (top) DNA strand of the L1 promoter in which cytosine methylation was maintained with high efficiency. Of these, 25 were at CG dinucleotides and four were in non-CG sites. When the methylation sites were analyzed for the complementary (bottom) strand, the only highly conserved sites of methylation were in CG dinucleotides. Several of these sites of CG methylation in the bottom (coding) strand were at positions where top (noncoding) strand-derived sequences were unmethylated, suggesting that these sites might be maintained in a hemi-methylated state. Hence, there is a subset of human L1 elements in which methylation is efficiently maintained in asymmetric non-CG sites and further that this non-CG methylation may be part of a wider phenomenon involving hemi-methylation at CG dinucleotides. Maintenance of asymmetric methylation at non-CG sites (and possibly at hemi-methylated CG dinucleotides) could be through a novel DNA methyltransferase activity. Alternatively, the promoter region of L1 elements may be induced by factor binding to form some type of secondary structure that presents as a highly efficient substrate for de novo methylation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Hypomethylation of L1 retrotransposons in colorectal cancer and adjacent normal tissue.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Malignant cells often exhibit perturbations in the pattern of cytosine methylation. Hypermethylation of CpG islands has been extensively documented, but genome-wide hypomethylation is also a common feature of malignant cells. The bulk of cytosine methylation in the mammalian genome occurs on repetitive elements. This study analysed the methylation status of L1 retrotransposons in colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Methylation-sensitive Southern blotting was used to determine L1 promoter methylation in colon tumours, adjacent normal tissue, and normal colonic mucosa from healthy individuals. RESULTS: Hypomethylation of L1 promoter sequences was detected in all tumours but was also detected in the histologically normal colonic mucosa of 6 of 19 cancer patients, even at a considerable distance from the tumour. L1 hypomethylation was not detected in matched normal peripheral blood, lymph node or smooth muscle tissue from cancer patients or in the colonic mucosa of 14 healthy individuals. We also assayed for the total proportion of methylated CpG in normal bowel specimens from normal and colon cancer patients. Normal mucosa from cancer patients exhibited lower levels of genomic methylation than the mucosa from healthy individuals, and levels were significantly lower in those patients exhibiting L1 promoter hypomethylation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that genomic hypomethylation is an early event in tumourigenesis. Progressive demethylation of L1 promoter sequences could lead to disturbance of normal gene expression and facilitate the process of neoplastic progression.

Adult↗

Galectin-3 and L1 retrotransposons in human breast carcinomas.

Galectin-3 is a galactoside binding protein found at elevated levels in a wide variety of neoplastic cells and thought to be involved in cognitive cellular interactions during transformation and metastasis. Previously, we have shown that introduction of human galectin-3 (Mr 31,000) cDNA into the human breast cancer cells BT-549 which are galectin-3 null and non-tumorigenic in nude mice resulted in the establishment of four galectin-3 expressing clones. Three of them acquired tumorigenicity when inoculated in the mammary fat pad of nude mice. Here, we questioned what is the molecular difference between the nude mouse tumorigenic and non-tumorigenic galectin-3 expressing BT-549 cell clones. Differential display analysis and Northern blotting revealed that, unlike the tumorigenic clones, neither the parental cells nor the non-tumorigenic clone expressed a 6.5 Kb transcript. A 607 bp PCR (polymerase chain reaction) product from the differentially displayed mRNA revealed a 93% sequence homology with the human L1 retrotransposon previously suggested to play a role in the pathobiology of some breast cancers. In addition, we show that the two gene products, i.e., galectin-3 and L1, are co-expressed in breast carcinoma specimens and in other nude mouse tumorigenic cell lines.

Antigens, Differentiation↗

Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition.

Human L1 elements are highly abundant poly(A) (non-LTR) retrotransposons whose second open reading frame (ORF2) encodes a reverse transcriptase (RT). We have identified an endonuclease (EN) domain at the L1 ORF2 N-terminus that is highly conserved among poly(A) retrotransposons and resembles the apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonucleases. Purified L1 EN protein (L1 ENp) makes 5'-PO4, 3'-OH nicks in supercoiled plasmids, shows no preference for AP sites, and preferentially cleaves sequences resembling L1 in vivo target sequences. Mutations in conserved amino acid residues of L1 EN abolish its nicking activity and eliminate L1 retrotransposition. We propose that L1 EN cleaves the target site for L1 insertion and primes reverse transcription.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Teleost fish genomes contain a diverse array of L1 retrotransposon lineages that exhibit a low copy number and high rate of turnover.

Retrotransposable elements exhibit a wide range of variation in population dynamics, abundance, and lineage diversity among host genomes across taxa. This range of diversity is illustrated by a single well-defined constituent monophyletic clade of L1 non-LTR retrotransposons that is shared between mammalian and teleost fish genomes. Despite the clear phylogenetic relationships that exist between mammalian and teleost L1 sequences, these elements exhibit markedly different dynamics within their respective taxa. While mammalian genomes typically contain a single, abundant lineage of L1 elements that traces millions of years of evolution, the zebraflsh genome was recently shown to exhibit a high diversity of ancient lineages coexisting at a very low copy number and apparently exhibiting a high rate of turnover. In the present study, a combination of degenerate PCR, lineage-specific PCR, and genomic Southern blot analysis is utilized to demonstrate high L1 lineage diversity, low copy number, and a high proportion of polymorphic inserts in the genomes of the killifish species, Fundulus heteroclitus. Additional species surveyed by degenerate PCR include Cyprinodon variegatus, Rivulus marmoratus, and Menidia beryllina. These results further support the generality of the differences that exist in host-element dynamics between teleost fish and mammalian genomes with regard to L1 retrotransposons.

Animals↗