Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Kinetochores”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Kinetochore motility after severing between sister centromeres using laser microsurgery: evidence that kinetochore directional instability and position is regulated by tension.

During mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells, the single attached kinetochore on a mono-oriented chromosome exhibits directional instability: abruptly and independently switching between constant velocity poleward and away from the pole motility states. When the non-attached sister becomes attached to the spindle (chromosome bi-orientation), the motility of the sister kinetochores becomes highly coordinated, one moving poleward while the other moves away from the pole, allowing chromosomes to congress to the spindle equator. In our kinetochore-tensiometer model, we hypothesized that this coordinated behavior is regulated by tension across the centromere produced by kinetochore movement relative to the sister kinetochore and bulk of the chromosome arms. To test this model, we severed or severely weakened the centromeric chromatin between sister kinetochores on bi-oriented newt lung cell chromosomes with a laser microbeam. This procedure converted a pair of tightly linked sister kinetochores into two mono-oriented single kinetochore-chromatin fragments that were tethered to their chromosome arms by thin compliant chromatin strands. These single kinetochore-chromatin fragments moved substantial distances off the metaphase plate, stretching their chromatin strands, before the durations of poleward and away from the pole movement again became similar. In contrast, the severed arms remained at or moved closer to the spindle equator. The poleward and away from the pole velocities of single kinetochore-chromatin fragments in prometaphase were typical of velocities exhibited by sister kinetochores on intact chromosomes from prometaphase through midanaphase A. However, severing the chromatin between sister kinetochores uncoupled the normally coordinated motility of sister kinetochores. Laser ablation also uncoupled the motilities of the single kinetochore fragments from the bulk of the arms. These results reveal that kinetochore directional instability is a fundamental property of the kinetochore and that the motilities of sister kinetochores are coordinated during congression by a stiff centromere linkage. We conclude that kinetochores act as tensiometers that sense centromere tension generated by differential movement of sister kinetochores and their chromosome arms to control switching between constant velocity P and AP motility states.

Animals↗

Traction force on a kinetochore at metaphase acts as a linear function of kinetochore fiber length.

We are investigating the relation between the force pulling a kinetochore poleward and the length of the corresponding kinetochore fiber. It was recognized by Ostergren in 1950 (Hereditas 36:1-19) that the metaphase position of a chromosome could be achieved by a balance of traction forces were proportional to the distance from kinetochore to pole. For the typical chromosome (i.e., a meiotic bivalent or mitotic chromosome) with a single kinetochore fiber extending to each pole, the resultant force (RF) would equal zero when the chromosome lay at the midpoint between the two poles. For special chromosomes that have unequal numbers of kinetochore fibers extending towards opposite poles. For special chromosomes that have unequal numbers of kinetochore fibers extending towards opposite poles. For special chromosomes that have unequal numbers of kinetochore fibers extending towards opposite poles, Ostergren's proposal suggests that RF = 0 when the chromosome is shifted closer to the pole toward which the greater number of kinetochore fibers are pulling. We have measured the force-length relationship in living spindles by analyzing the metaphase positions of experimentally generated multivalent chromosomes having three or four kinetochore fibers. Multivalent chromosomes of varied configurations were generated by gamma-irradiation of nymphs of the grasshopper melanoplus differentialis, and their behavior was analyzed in living first meiotic spermocytes. The lengths of kinetochore fibers were determined from time-lapse photographs by measuring the kinetochore-to-pole distances for fully congressed chromosomes just before the onset of anaphase. In our analysis, force (F) along a single kinetochore fiber is expressed by: F = kL(exp), where k is a length-independent proportionality constant, L represents the kinetochore fiber length, and exp is an unknown exponent. The RF on a chromosome is then given by: RF = sigmak(i)L(i)(exp), where kinetochore fiber lengths in opposite half- spindles are given opposite sign. If forces on a metaphase chromosome are at equilibrium (RF = 0), then for asymmetrical orientations of multivalents we can measure the individual kinetochore fiber lengths (L(i)) and solve for the exponent that yields a resultant force of zero. The value of the exponent relates how the magnitude of force along a kinetochore fiber varies with its length. For six trivalents and one naturally occurring quadrivalent we calculated an average value of exp = 1.06 +/- 0.18. This result is consistent with Ostergren's hypothesis and indicates that the magnitude of poleward traction force along a kinetochore fiber is directly proportional to the length of the fiber. Our finding suggests that the balance of forces along a kinetochore fiber may be a major factor regulating the extent of kinetochore microtubule assembly.

Animals↗

Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. II. The prometaphase-I kinetochore microtubule bundle and kinetochore orientation in males.

Fourteen prometaphase kinetochore microtubule bundles have been examined in electron micrographs of serial sections. The majority (54%) of the microtubules extended from the polar region towards the kinetochore but do not end in the kinetochore proper. Rather, they stop short of the kinetochore (21%), graze the kinetochore (19%), or pass through the kinetochore (9%), displaying a free end distal to the pole. Other microtubules that make up the kinetochore bundle include: kinetochore-to-pole microtubules (24%), chromosome-to-pole microtubules (5%), pieces with two free ends (14%), and those microtubules with one end in the kinetochore and a free end distal to the kinetochore (9%). We conclude that the majority of the microtubules in the kinetochore bundle are most likely of polar origin rather than having been nucleated at the kinetochore. Prometaphase-I kinetochores can display any one of four patterns of microtubule connections with the poles, but the pattern of microtubule connections is not always correlated with kinetochore position. For instance, a kinetochore directly facing one pole may have microtubule connections with both poles while a kinetochore positioned 90 degrees to the spindle axis may have microtubules running towards one pole only.

Animals↗

Compound kinetochores of the Indian muntjac. Evolution by linear fusion of unit kinetochores.

The chromosomes of the Indian muntjac (Muntiacus muntjak vaginalis) are unique among mammals due to their low diploid number (2N = 6 female, 7 male) and large size. It has been proposed that the karyotype of this small Asiatic deer evolved from a related deer the Chinese muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) with a diploid chromosome number of 2n = 46 consisting of small telocentric chromosomes. In this study we utilized a kinetochore-specific antiserum derived from human patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma CREST as an immunofluorescent probe to examine kinetochores of the two muntjac species. Since CREST antiserum binds to kinetochores of mitotic chromosomes as well as prekinetochores in interphase nuclei, it was possible to identify and compare kinetochore morphology throughout the cell cycle. Our observations indicated that the kinetochores of the Indian muntjac are composed of a linear beadlike array of smaller subunits that become revealed during interphase. The kinetochores of the Chinese muntjac consisted of minute fluorescent dots located at the tips of the 46 telocentric chromosomes. During interphase, however, the kinetochores of the Chinese muntjac clustered into small aggregates reminiscent of the beadlike arrays seen in the Indian muntjac. Morphometric measurements of fluorescence indicated an equivalent amount of stained material in the two species. Our observations indicate that the kinetochores of the Indian muntjac are compound structures composed of linear arrays of smaller units the size of the individual kinetochores seen on metaphase chromosomes of the Chinese muntjac. Our study supports the notion that the kinetochores of the Indian muntjac evolved by linear fusion of unit kinetochores of the Chinese muntjac. Moreover, it is concluded that the evolution of compound kinetochores may have been facilitated by the non-random aggregation of interphase kinetochores in the nuclei of the ancestral species.

Animals↗

Poleward force at the kinetochore in metaphase depends on the number of kinetochore microtubules.

To examine the dependence of poleward force at a kinetochore on the number of kinetochore microtubules (kMTs), we altered the normal balance in the number of microtubules at opposing homologous kinetochores in meiosis I grasshopper spermatocytes at metaphase with a focused laser microbeam. Observations were made with light and electron microscopy. Irradiations that partially damaged one homologous kinetochore caused the bivalent chromosome to shift to a new equilibrium position closer to the pole to which the unirradiated kinetochore was tethered; the greater the dose of irradiation, the farther the chromosome moved. The number of kMTs on the irradiated kinetochore decreased with severity of irradiation, while the number of kMTs on the unirradiated kinetochore remained constant and independent of chromosome-to-pole distance. Assuming a balance of forces on the chromosome at congression equilibrium, our results demonstrate that the net poleward force on a chromosome depends on the number of kMTs and the distance from the pole. In contrast, the velocity of chromosome movement showed little dependence on the number of kMTs. Possible mechanisms which explain the relationship between the poleward force at a kinetochore, the number of kinetochore microtubules, and the lengths of the kinetochore fibers at congression equilibrium include a "traction fiber model" in which poleward force producers are distributed along the length of the kinetochore fibers, or a "kinetochore motor-polar ejection model" in which force producers located at or near the kinetochore pull the chromosomes poleward along the kMTs and against an ejection force that is produced by the polar microtubule array and increases in strength toward the pole.

Animals↗

Characterization of the kinetochore binding domain of CENP-E reveals interactions with the kinetochore proteins CENP-F and hBUBR1.

We have identified a 350-amino acid domain in the kinetochore motor CENP-E that specifies kinetochore binding in mitosis but not during interphase. The kinetochore binding domain was used in a yeast two-hybrid screen to isolate interacting proteins that included the kinetochore proteins CENP-E, CENP-F, and hBUBR1, a BUB1-related kinase that was found to be mutated in some colorectal carcinomas (Cahill, D.P., C. Lengauer, J. Yu, G.J. Riggins, J.K. Wilson, S.D. Markowitz, K.W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstein. 1998. Nature. 392:300-303). CENP-F, hBUBR1, and CENP-E assembled onto kinetochores in sequential order during late stages of the cell cycle. These proteins therefore define discrete steps along the kinetochore assembly pathway. Kinetochores of unaligned chromosome exhibited stronger hBUBR1 and CENP-E staining than those of aligned chromosomes. CENP-E and hBUBR1 remain colocalized at kinetochores until mid-anaphase when hBUBR1 localized to portions of the spindle midzone that did not overlap with CENP-E. As CENP-E and hBUBR1 can coimmunoprecipitate with each other from HeLa cells, they may function as a motor-kinase complex at kinetochores. However, the complex distribution pattern of hBUBR1 suggests that it may regulate multiple functions that include the kinetochore and the spindle midzone.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Kinetochore structure: electron spectroscopic imaging of the kinetochore.

The structure of the kinetochore in thin section has been studied in the Indian muntjac by an electron spectroscopic imaging technique. This procedures allows the analysis of the distribution of phosphorus within the layers of the kinetochore. The results indicate that this element is a major component of both the inner and outer plates whereas it is largely absent in the middle plate and fibrous corona. The majority of the phosphorus is localized to a 30-nm fiber(s) that is woven through the layers of the kinetochore. The presence of phosphorus within this fiber, along with its morphological and biochemical features, indicates that it contains DNA. The fiber(s) occupies a major portion of the inner and outer plate where it forms a series of rows. It is rarely observed in the middle layer except where it passes between the inner and outer layers. The absence of structure in the middle plate suggests that it may represent a space rather than a plate that in turn may be related to the function of this region. The distribution of phosphorus within the kinetochore is neither altered by treatment with colcemid nor by the presence of microtubules at the kinetochore. Analysis of conventional micrographs of the kinetochore together with structural information obtained by electron spectroscopic imaging suggests that most microtubules insert and terminate between the rows of kinetochore fibers in the outer plate. However, some microtubules continue through the middle layer and terminate at the lower plate. The insertion of microtubules at different levels of the kinetochore may reflect the existence of functionally distinct microtubule classes. Electron spectroscopic imaging indicates that the microtubules associated with the kinetochore are phosphorylated.

Animals↗

Kinetochore microtubules shorten by loss of subunits at the kinetochores of prometaphase chromosomes.

The site of tubulin subunit dissociation was determined during poleward chromosome movement in prometaphase newt lung cell mitotic spindles using fluorescence photobleaching techniques and nocodazole-induced spindle shortening. Synchronous shortening of all kinetochore microtubules was produced by incubating cells in 17 microM nocodazole to block microtubule assembly. Under these conditions the spindle poles moved towards the metaphase plate at a rate of 3.6 +/- 0.4 microns min-1 (n = 3). On the basis of anti-tubulin immunofluorescent staining of cells fixed after incubation in nocodazole, we found that nonkinetochore microtubules rapidly disappeared and only kinetochore fibers were present after 60-90 s in nocodazole. To localize the site of tubulin subunit dissociation, a narrow bar pattern was photobleached across one half-spindle in prometaphase-metaphase cells previously microinjected with 5-(4,6-dichlorotriazin-2-yl) amino fluorescein (DTAF)-labeled tubulin. Immediately after photobleaching, cells were perfused with 17 microM nocodazole to produce shortening of kinetochore microtubules. Shortening was accompanied by a decrease in the distance between the bleach bar and the kinetochores. In contrast, there was little or no decrease in the distance between the bleach bar and the pole. Compared to their initial lengths, the average kinetochore to pole distance shortened by 18%, the bleach bar to kinetochore distance shortened by 28% and the average bleached bar to pole distance shortened by 1.6%. The data provide evidence that tubulin subunits dissociate from kinetochore microtubules at a site near the kinetochore during poleward chromosome movement. These results are consistent with models of poleward force generation for chromosome movement in which prometaphase-metaphase poleward force is generated in association with the kinetochore.

Animals↗

The ultrastructure of the kinetochore and kinetochore fiber in Drosophila somatic cells.

Drosophila melanogaster is a widely used model organism for the molecular dissection of mitosis in animals. However, despite the popularity of this system, no studies have been published on the ultrastructure of Drosophila kinetochores and kinetochore fibers (K-fibers) in somatic cells. To amend this situation, we used correlative light (LM) and electron microscopy (EM) to study kinetochores in cultured Drosophila S2 cells during metaphase, and after colchicine treatment to depolymerize all microtubules (MTs). We find that the structure of attached kinetochores in S2 cells is indistinct, consisting of an amorphous inner zone associated with a more electron-dense peripheral surface layer that is approximately 40-50 nm thick. On average, each S2 kinetochore binds 11+/-2 MTs, in contrast to the 4-6 MTs per kinetochore reported for Drosophila spermatocytes. Importantly, nearly all of the kinetochore MT plus ends terminate in the peripheral surface layer, which we argue is analogous to the outer plate in vertebrate kinetochores. Our structural observations provide important data for assessing the results of RNAi studies of mitosis, as well as for the development of mathematical modelling and computer simulation studies in Drosophila and related organisms.

Animals↗

The hBUB1 and hBUBR1 kinases sequentially assemble onto kinetochores during prophase with hBUBR1 concentrating at the kinetochore plates in mitosis.

The kinetochore binds an evolutionarily conserved set of checkpoint proteins that function to monitor whether chromosomes have aligned properly at the spindle equator. Human cells contain two related protein kinases, hBUB1 and hBUBR1, that appear to have evolved from a single ancestral BUB1 gene. We generated hBUB1- and hBUBR1-specific antibodies so that the localization patterns of these kinases could be directly compared. In the human U2OS osteosarcoma cell line, hBUB1 first appeared at kinetochores during early prophase before all kinetochores were occupied by hBUBR1 or CENP-F. Both proteins remained at kinetochores throughout mitosis but their staining intensity was reduced from anaphase onward. Kinetochores of unaligned chromosomes exhibited stronger hBUB1 and hBUBR1 staining. Immunoelectron microscopy showed that hBUBR1 appeared to be concentrated in the outer kinetochore plate and in some instances the inner plate as well. When chromosome spreads were examined by light microscopy, hBUB1 and hBUBR1 were coincident with CENP-E. This suggests that both kinases are concentrated near the surface of the kinetochore where they can monitor kinetochore-microtubule interactions.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗

Native yeast kinetochore structures identify an essential inner kinetochore interaction.

Kinetochores must accurately assemble on centromeres for faithful chromosome segregation. Although a conserved centromeric nucleosome is essential for kinetochore assembly, budding yeast centromeric DNA is a poor template for nucleosome formation in vitro, perhaps due to its intrinsic rigidity. To better understand yeast inner kinetochore assembly, we develop a one-step protocol to purify native inner kinetochore subcomplexes for structural studies. We perform cryoelectron microscopy on the purifications and generate density maps of four separate inner kinetochore complexes, two of which have not been previously visualized and may represent intermediate assemblage states. We identify an Ndc10 trimerization domain that engages centromeric DNA and a pair of CBF3 complexes and is associated with substantial bending of centromeric DNA. Ndc10 trimerization is essential for kinetochore assembly and chromosome segregation. We propose that Ndc10 trimerization facilitates centromeric DNA bending to stabilize the centromeric nucleosome and inner kinetochore.

Kinetochores↗

Kinetochore-driven formation of kinetochore fibers contributes to spindle assembly during animal mitosis.

It is now clear that a centrosome-independent pathway for mitotic spindle assembly exists even in cells that normally possess centrosomes. The question remains, however, whether this pathway only activates when centrosome activity is compromised, or whether it contributes to spindle morphogenesis during a normal mitosis. Here, we show that many of the kinetochore fibers (K-fibers) in centrosomal Drosophila S2 cells are formed by the kinetochores. Initially, kinetochore-formed K-fibers are not oriented toward a spindle pole but, as they grow, their minus ends are captured by astral microtubules (MTs) and transported poleward through a dynein-dependent mechanism. This poleward transport results in chromosome bi-orientation and congression. Furthermore, when individual K-fibers are severed by laser microsurgery, they regrow from the kinetochore outward via MT plus-end polymerization at the kinetochore. Thus, even in the presence of centrosomes, the formation of some K-fibers is initiated by the kinetochores. However, centrosomes facilitate the proper orientation of K-fibers toward spindle poles by integrating them into a common spindle.

Animals↗

Electron-microscopic and immunochemical analysis of kinetochore microtubules after ultraviolet microbeam irradiation of kinetochores.

We used an ultraviolet microbeam to irradiate kinetochores of chromosomes in crane-fly spermatocytes. We used one of two doses, low (0.106 erg microns-2) or high (0.301 erg microns-2), and then studied the microtubules in those spindles using electron microscopy or immunofluorescence microscopy. After irradiation with low doses microtubules are present as usual, with normal fluorescence and in normal numbers. After irradiation with high doses microtubules are no longer associated with the irradiated kinetochore. After irradiation with either dose, non-kinetochore microtubules are in smaller numbers in the irradiated half-spindle than in the non-irradiated half-spindle or in non-irradiated cells. Since irradiation with low doses alters interchromosomal 'signals', but microtubules remain attached to the kinetochore, we argue that low doses of ultraviolet light damage a signal-related function of kinetochores without altering the ability of the kinetochores to bind microtubules.

Animals↗

Ctf19p: A novel kinetochore protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and a potential link between the kinetochore and mitotic spindle.

A genetic synthetic dosage lethality (SDL) screen using CTF13 encoding a known kinetochore protein as the overexpressed reference gene identified two chromosome transmission fidelity (ctf) mutants, YCTF58 and YCTF26. These mutant strains carry independent alleles of a novel gene, which we have designated CTF19. In light of its potential role in kinetochore function, we have cloned and characterized the CTF19 gene in detail. CTF19 encodes a nonessential 369-amino acid protein. ctf19 mutant strains display a severe chromosome missegregation phenotype, are hypersensitive to benomyl, and accumulate at G2/M in cycling cells. CTF19 genetically interacts with kinetochore structural mutants and mitotic checkpoint mutants. In addition, ctf19 mutants show a defect in the ability of centromeres on minichromosomes to bind microtubules in an in vitro assay. In vivo cross-linking and chromatin immunoprecipitation demonstrates that Ctf19p specifically interacts with CEN DNA. Furthermore, Ctf19-HAp localizes to the nuclear face of the spindle pole body and genetically interacts with a spindle-associated protein. We propose that Ctf19p is part of a macromolecular kinetochore complex, which may function as a link between the kinetochore and the mitotic spindle.

Anaphase↗

Human Shugoshin mediates kinetochore-driven formation of kinetochore microtubules.

The conserved protein Shugoshin (Sgo) plays a role in the maintenance of centromeric cohesion in mitosis and meiosis. Human Shugoshin (hSgo) was first identified as an overexpressed protein in breast cancers. Here we demonstrate that hSgo mediates kinetochore-driven formation of kinetochore -microtubules (MTs) during bipolar spindle assembly. The regulated overexpression of full-length hSgo, or of truncated proteins containing both the conserved N-terminal coiled-coil domain and C-terminal basic domain, resulted in hSgo localization at centromere at early mitosis and was associated with aberrant nucleation and formation of bundles of kinetochore-MTs. The mid-portion of hSgo, between the N- and C-terminal domains, includes both a functional domain for centromeric cohesion and a regulatory domain for spindle assembly. The cells overexpressing natural alternative splicing isoforms, which are almost completely defective for the mid-portion of the hSgo protein, showed premature centromere separation (PCS) and aberrant MT connections. These isoforms are mildly overexpressed in HEK293 cells. On the other hand, cells expressing a truncated protein, defective in the lysine-rich region of the mid-portion, arrested at mitosis due to persistent abnormal MT connections and not because of PCS. Aberrant MT connections were predominantly observed in spindle regions where chromosomes were clustered. Interestingly, we also found that hSgo is rapidly exchanged at kinetochores at early mitosis. Based on these results, we conclude that hSgo may be diffusible and have a role in proper kinetochores MTs attachment.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗

Visualization of prekinetochore locus on the centromeric region of highly extended chromatin fibers: does kinetochore autoantigen CENP-C constitute a kinetochore organizing center?

Kinetochore is morphologically defined as a trilaminated, highly differentiated structure at the primary constriction of mitotic chromosomes. This subcellular organella is assumed to be composed of DNA and proteins. Immunoelectron microscopy has shown that centromere autoantigens CENP-C and CENP-B localize to the kinetochore inner plate and the underlying centromeric region respectively. We previously indicated that both are DNA-binding proteins that constitute centromeric heterochromatin throughout the cell cycle. Here, we tried to elucidate how these molecules are involved in the kinetochore/centromere organization in vivo by analyzing their morphological behavior in nuclei. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found that CENP-C remained as round discrete dots, whereas CENP-B displayed larger surrounding materials. To examine the CENP-C-binding locus on the genome, we prepared highly extended chromatin fibers and performed simultaneous immunofluorescence and fluorescence in situ hybridization. We obsreved that centromeric alphoid DNA, targeted by CENP-B, was highly dispersed, whereas the CENP-C antigen persisted as small dots well situated on the fibers. These features reminded us of the 'ball and cup' structure that had been presented for 'prekinetochore'. We propose here that CENP-C constitutes a 'kinetochore organizing center' tightly associating with DNA, whereas CENP-B heterochromatin offers the solid support during kinetochore maturation.

Animals↗

The fission yeast kinetochore component Spc7 associates with the EB1 family member Mal3 and is required for kinetochore-spindle association.

A critical aspect of mitosis is the interaction of the kinetochore with spindle microtubules. Fission yeast Mal3 is a member of the EB1 family of microtubule plus-end binding proteins, which have been implicated in this process. However, the Mal3 interaction partner at the kinetochore had not been identified. Here, we show that the mal3 mutant phenotype can be suppressed by the presence of extra Spc7, an essential kinetochore protein associated with the central centromere region. Mal3 and Spc7 interact physically as both proteins can be coimmunoprecipitated. Overexpression of a Spc7 variant severely compromises kinetochore-microtubule interaction, indicating that the Spc7 protein plays a role in this process. Spc7 function seems to be conserved because, Spc105, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae homolog of Spc7, identified by mass spectrometry as a component of the conserved Ndc80 complex, can rescue mal3 mutant strains.

Centromere↗

The budding yeast proteins Spc24p and Spc25p interact with Ndc80p and Nuf2p at the kinetochore and are important for kinetochore clustering and checkpoint control.

Here, we show that the budding yeast proteins Ndc80p, Nuf2p, Spc24p and Spc25p interact at the kinetochore. Consistently, Ndc80p, Nuf2p, Spc24p and Spc25p associate with centromere DNA in chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, and SPC24 interacts genetically with MCM21 encoding a kinetochore component. Moreover, although conditional lethal spc24-2 and spc25-7 cells form a mitotic spindle, the kinetochores remain in the mother cell body and fail to segregate the chromosomes. Despite this defect in chromosome segregation, spc24-2 and spc25-7 cells do not arrest in metaphase in response to checkpoint control. Furthermore, spc24-2 cells showed a mitotic checkpoint defect when microtubules were depolymerized with nocodazole, indicating that Spc24p has a function in checkpoint control. Since Ndc80p, Nuf2p and Spc24p are conserved proteins, it is likely that similar complexes are part of the kinetochore in other organisms.

Amino Acid Sequence↗