Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Intensive Care, Neonatal”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Fragmentation of treatment and the potential for human error in neonatal intensive care.

Neonatal intensive care involves continuous monitoring of highly unstable patients in order to plan and deliver effective care and treatment. Making care and treatment decisions depends upon using information obtained in many different ways. Analysis of care and treatment tasks shows how much staff need to rely on one another for crucial information. This problem becomes more acute as personnel change shifts, yet are still obliged to maintain continuity of care. Effective sharing of information is done through the medium of shared records, shift handovers, ward rounds, and informal verbal exchanges. This article describes strategies for understanding the tasks involved in neonatal intensive care, considers issues of task fragmentation, identifies the communication systems designed to minimize the effects of this fragmentation, and reviews problems associated with those systems that give rise to the potential for human error.

Humans↗
PubMed1984

A review of current methods of monitoring in neonatal intensive care.

Neonatal intensive care requires continuous close monitoring of several physiological parameters. The machinery involved is complex but has to be understood by medical staff with the minimum of training in its use. Failure of correct application and interpretation of results can be dangerous for the sick or preterm infant.

Blood Pressure Determination↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Bioethics, deontology, and law in neonatal intensive care].

Neonatal intensive care has greatly improved the survival chances but, at the same time, it has also given rise to serious ethical problems. Different contexts influence both physicians attitude and end-of-life practices in neonatology. The clinicians can not ever follow the principles of bioethics, as they are sometimes in conflict. Also, the strategies or guidelines proposed as approaches to neonatal decision-making are difficult to practise. Probably a neonatologist makes his decision even on the basis of his interior conviction and it is well known that in Italy the debate on bioethics is the subject of confrontation between Roman Catholic and secular viewpoint, expressing two positions: the so-called sanctity and the quality of life. However, a clinician has also an obligation to follow the Code of Professional Medical Ethics which cautions against therapeutic aggressiveness; but this document has not legal status. In addition, Italian law is strongly protective of infant life and any discrimination on the basis of malformation or poor prognosis violates constitutional law; moreover, the resuscitation of a preterm infant is mandatory even when the birth is the result of induced late abortion. The author concludes emphasizing the importance, in decision making, of accepting difference as opposed to the logic of the absoluteness of normality, because many handicaps may be accepted and a society expresses its moral richness also by the solidarity reserved to its weakest sons.

Bioethics↗
PubMed1990

Comparison of perceived needs of family members between registered nurses and family members of critically ill patients in intensive care and neonatal intensive care units.

Using the Norris and Grove (1986) questionnaire of perceived needs of families of critically ill patients, 11 registered nurses working in the neonatal intensive care unit and 19 registered nurses working in the intensive care unit of two mid-northern community hospitals provided their perceptions of family needs. Their responses were compared with responses of family members of patients in the intensive care unit (n = 25) and the (n = 24). Results suggest that regardless of unit, registered nurses' perceptions of family needs are congruent. Family members collectively and by unit ranked their needs consistently higher and in some areas differently than did the registered nurses.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Assessing the effectiveness of neonatal intensive care.

Although neonatal intensive care has been praised widely for individual successes, its effectiveness has not been established systematically or conclusively. The literature consists principally of reports from individual intensive care units with sample sizes too small for statistical validation or generalization. This study analyzes the results obtained by recalculating and pooling the isolated reports. In addition, the findings of the solitary clinical trial, some scattered epidemiologic data, and several analyses of regional birthweight-specific time series data are reviewed. Taken together, this constitutes a body of evidence that supports the conclusion that intensive neonatal medical care has played a significant role in bringing about the impressive reduction in infant mortality that has taken place in this country since 1965.

Birth Weight↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cost of neonatal intensive care.

Neonates are among those patients generating the highest hospital costs in recent years. There are no published data on the costs of neonatal intensive care in our country. The aim of our study was to analyse the cost of neonatal intensive care in a tertiary care unit. The average hospital charges per day were higher among non-survivors (Rs. 1857) compared to survivors (Rs. 727). Care of more than 1250 gms infant is cost beneficial in our set up.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed2002

The relation between the availability of neonatal intensive care and neonatal mortality.

BACKGROUND: There is marked regional variation in the availability of neonatal intensive care in the United States. We conducted a study to determine whether a greater supply of neonatologists or neonatal intensive care beds is associated with lower neonatal mortality. METHODS: We used the 1996 master files of the American Medical Association and the American Osteopathic Association and 1998 and 1999 surveys of neonatal intensive care units to calculate the supply of neonatologists and neonatal intensive care beds in 246 neonatal intensive care regions. We used linked birth and death records from the 1995 U.S. birth cohort to assess associations between the supply of both neonatologists and neonatal intensive care beds per capita (in quintiles) and the risk of death within the first 27 days of life. RESULTS: Among 3,892,208 newborns with a birth weight of 500 g or greater, the mortality rate was 3.4 per 1000 births. After adjustment for neonatal and maternal characteristics associated with an increased risk of neonatal death, the rate was lower in the regions with 4.3 neonatologists per 10,000 births than in those with 2.7 neonatologists per 10,000 births (odds ratio for death, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.88 to 0.99). Further increases in the number of neonatologists were not associated with greater reductions in the risk of death. There was no consistent relation between the number of neonatal intensive care beds and neonatal mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of regions in the United States may have inadequate neonatal intensive care resources, whereas many others may have more resources than are needed to prevent the death of high-risk newborns. The effect of the availability of neonatologists on other health outcomes is not known.

Birth Weight↗
PubMed1998

Frequency of neurologic disorders in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Neonatal intensive care unit survival rates have improved significantly over the past decade. This improvement primarily reflects declining mortality rates among preterm infants. Neurologic morbidity increases with prematurity and is the major predictor of long-term disability. Accordingly, concern has been expressed that the burden of neurologic dysfunction among contemporary neonatal intensive care unit survivors may be increasing. To define the trends of neurologic disorders in the contemporary neonatal intensive care unit, all 4164 admissions between 1986 and 1995 to a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit were examined. Neonatal intensive care unit admissions (413 +/- 49 per year), proportion of births at less than 37 weeks (70 +/- 3% per year), and referral patterns were stable between 1986 and 1995. Over the study period, 773 (18%) of 4164 neonatal intensive care unit infants had a total of 1062 neurologic disorders. The neonatal intensive care unit mortality rate declined from 12% in 1986 to 4.2% in 1995 (P < .01). Neurologic disorders declined, from 27% of infants born in 1986 to 12% in 1995 (P < .001): 356 had seizures (14% in 1986 to 4% in 1995; P < .001), 235 had hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (8% in 1986 to 4% in 1995, P < .01), and 167 had intraventricular hemorrhage (7% in 1986 to 1.4% in 1995, P < .005). Frequency of congenital or chromosomal aberration affecting the nervous system was relatively constant (4.5% per year). Despite a three-fold improvement in neonatal intensive care unit survival between 1986 and 1995, the frequency of perinatally acquired neurologic disorders declined by more than 50%.

Female↗
PubMed1996

Parents' values: a missing link in the neonatal intensive care equation.

Neonatal intensive care has become a widely accepted component of our health care system. Its acceptance and growth are related to increased technology and specialization. However, little consideration has been given to the process of making decisions about the use of neonatal intensive care from the perspective of the patient's family. This article reviews the existing literature related to parents' opinions and perceptions of care in the NICU and proposes a framework for the exploration of the value systems of parents of infants requiring neonatal intensive care.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed2003

Implementing potentially better practices for improving family-centered care in neonatal intensive care units: successes and challenges.

OBJECTIVE: Multidisciplinary teams from 11 medical center neonatal intensive care units collaborated in a quality improvement project with a focus on family-centered care. METHODS: Through a process of self-analysis, literature review, benchmarking site visits, and expert consultation, 10 potentially better practice (PBP) areas were defined. Improvement activities in 4 of the 10 areas are given as examples of successes and challenges that individual centers encountered. The 4 areas are vision and philosophy, unit culture, family participation in care, and families as advisors. RESULTS: Centers were at different places for all of the PBPs at the beginning and throughout the collaboration. Seven centers developed or revised their vision or philosophy of care statements about family-centered care. Incorporating the vision and philosophy of care into performance appraisals, hiring of new personnel, and changing unit culture to a more family-centered practice were more challenging than developing the statements. Full parent participation in care requires unrestricted access to the neonatal intensive care unit. The shift from considering parents to be "visitors" to being partners in caring for their child was more difficult for centers with restricted visitation policies. All centers developed, expanded, or started plans for establishing family advisory councils. The experience of 2 centers is described. CONCLUSIONS: Family-centered care is more of a journey than a destination. Collaborating centers in this project found themselves at different places in that journey. Through perseverance in implementing the PBPs, all have moved further along the path.

Benchmarking↗
PubMed1983

Decisions to withdraw life support in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Neonatal intensive care units may choose to selectively withdraw support in some neonates with severe brain damage. We offer suggestions for criteria for such withdrawal, and a review of 20 cases in which such a decision-making process occurred in our neonatal intensive care unit.

Asphyxia Neonatorum↗
PubMed1992

Covering the costs of care in neonatal intensive care units.

The continued rise of health care costs, despite private and governmental control efforts, has sustained cost containment as a central issue for health care researchers and policy makers. In keeping with these concerns, the Florida Health Care Cost Containment Board conducted a study of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Florida to ascertain the costs, charges, and net revenues associated with NICU services in individual hospitals, to document cost shifting and cross-subsidization as a means of financing NICU care for indigent populations, and to assess the fiscal impact of NICUs in state-sponsored vs non-state-sponsored Regional Perinatal Intensive Care Center hospitals providing NICU care. Hospitals in the state-sponsored program reported a loss of approximately $16.5 million in contrast to the non-state-sponsored hospitals, which reported a gain of $1 million. Payment being generated by private-pay patients amounted to almost 60% of total revenues but constituted less than one third of the costs in state-sponsored hospitals, indicating a high level of cost shifting. Government support of state-sponsored NICUs, while substantial, has been insufficient; increasing constraints on this funding source would likely worsen the deficit and increase the necessity of cost shifting.

Ancillary Services, Hospital↗
PubMed2003

Evaluation and development of potentially better practices for improving family-centered care in neonatal intensive care units.

OBJECTIVE: Technological and scientific advances have progressively decreased neonatal morbidity and mortality. Less attention has been given to meeting the psychosocial needs of the infant and family than on meeting the infant's physical needs. Parents' participation in making decisions and caring for their child has often been limited. Environments designed for efficient technological care may not be optimal for nurturing the growth and development of sick neonates or their families. Eleven centers collaborating on quality improvement tried to make the care of families better by focusing on understanding and improving family-centered care. METHODS: Through internal process analysis, review of the evidence, collaborative learning, and benchmarking site visits to centers of excellence in family-centered care, a list of potentially better practices was developed. Choice of which practices to implement and methods of implementation were center specific. Improvement goals were in 3 areas: parent-reported outcomes, staff beliefs and practices, and clinical outcomes in length of stay and feeding practices. Measurement tools for the first 2 areas were developed and pilots were conducted. RESULTS: Length of stay and feeding outcomes were not different before the collaboration (1998) and at the formal end of the collaboration (2000). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective parent-reported outcomes are being collected, and the staff beliefs and practices questionnaire will be repeated in all centers to determine the impact of the project in those areas.

Benchmarking↗