Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Insulin Lispro”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Improved blood glucose variability, HbA1c insuman Infusat and less insulin requirement in IDDM patients using insulin lispro in CSII. The Swedish Multicenter Lispro Insulin Study.

The aim of the study was to compare lispro (LP) and Insuman(R) (I) insulin in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy with respect to blood glucose control as expressed by the standard deviation of blood glucose (SD(BG) ) and HbA(1c) and to monitor the well-being (WBQ) and treatment satisfaction (DTSQ) parameters during such treatment. Forty-one IDDM patients who had used CSII for at least 6 months participated in an open-label, randomized, cross-over, multicenter study for 4 months (2 months LP and 2 months I or vice versa). Boluses with LP were given 5 min before each meal and with I 30 min before each meal. During LP administration compared with I, the SD(BG) of all blood glucose values (3.6 mmol/l vs. 3.9 mmol/l, p=0.012), as well as the SD(BG) of the postprandial, blood glucose values (3.6 mmol/l vs. 4.0 mmol/l, p=0.006), were significantly reduced. The HbA(1c) was significantly lower during LP administration (7.4% vs. 7.6%, p=0.047). The incidence of hypoglycemic events per 30 days (capillary blood glucose<3.0 mmol/l and/or symptoms) did not significantly differ between LP and I (9.7 vs. 8.0 per month, p=0.23). The total amount of daily insulin was slightly but significantly lower with LP, compared to I (38.0 IU vs. 40.3 IU, p=0.004). There was no treatment effects of LP compared to I concerning WBQ and DTSQ. It is concluded that in CSII therapy LP is superior to I with respect to the stability of blood glucose control, a lower HbA(1c), a less insulin requirement without increasing the frequency of hypoglycemia.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Prandial insulin substitution with insulin lispro or insulin lispro mid mixture vs. basal therapy with insulin glargine: a randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes beginning insulin therapy.

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of prandial insulin therapy focusing on postprandial glucose control vs. basal insulin therapy focusing on fasting glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, parallel, three-arm multicenter trial in patients with type 2 diabetes starting insulin treatment. Patients (n=159) were randomly assigned to 24-week treatment with 3x daily insulin lispro, 3x daily lispro mid mixture (MidMix; 50% lispro, 50% protaminated lispro), or 1x daily insulin glargine; oral antihyperglycemic agents were discontinued. Primary end point was the postprandial glucose excursion 2 h after breakfast at the end of study. Secondary outcomes included HbA1c, self-monitored blood glucose profiles, hypoglycemic episodes, body weight, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: At the end of study, glucose excursions 2 h after breakfast were significantly lower with lispro and MidMix than with glargine (P<.001 for each vs. glargine): lispro, -0.6+/-2.0 mmol/l; MidMix, +0.8+/-2.4 mmol/l; glargine, +2.5+/-2.4 mmol/l. Fasting glucose decreases were significantly greater with glargine (-2.6+/-2.4 mmol/l) than with lispro or MidMix (-0.9+/-2.2 mmol/l; +0.9+/-1.8 mmol/l). Nevertheless, HbA1c decreased by 1.1% (lispro) and 1.2% (MidMix), vs. 0.3% with glargine. Hypoglycemic episodes were rare with 1-1.5 self-reported episodes per 100 patient-days. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes starting insulin, 3x daily prandial treatment with a rapid-acting analog focusing on postprandial glucose values enabled better control of postprandial and circadian blood glucose profiles than once-daily glargine, in spite suboptimal fasting glucose levels, which targets fasting glucose values. These results support studies suggesting that control of postprandial hyperglycemia plays a key role in achieving HbA1c targets.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Improved glycaemic control with the use of self-prepared mixtures of insulin lispro and insulin lispro protamine suspension in patients with types 1 and 2 diabetes.

A total of 166 patients (102 type 1, 64 type 2) were randomised to insulin lispro (LP) combined with insulin lispro protamine suspension (NPL), an intermediate-acting formulation of LP, or to regular human insulin (HR) combined with human NPH insulin (NPH) in this open-label, parallel study. Insulin doses were similar at endpoint. Blood glucose (BG) measurements (before and two hours after meals, bedtime, 3 a.m.)(mmol/l) were lower with LP/NPL two hours after breakfast (8.84 +/- 0.32 vs 10.29 +/- 0.41, p < 0.001), before lunch (6.21 +/- 0.20 vs 7.10 +/- 0.31, p = 0.016), two hours after the evening meal (10.18 +/- 0.36 vs 7.86 +/- 0.28, p < 0.0.001), and at bedtime (7.85 +/- 0.28 vs 9.43 +/- 0.40, p = 001). HbA1c was lower for LP/NPL at endpoint (7.54 +/- 0.11% vs 7.92 +/- 0.10%, p = 0.019). There was no difference in hypoglycaemia or insulin antibody levels. LP/NPL resulted in better glycaemic control than HR/NPH without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Sensitive RIA for the specific determination of insulin lispro.

Insulin lispro is an insulin analog in which the primary sequence has been altered by the inversion of amino acids B28 and B29. To date, it has not been possible to specifically measure insulin lispro in the presence of endogenous insulin because of the high degree of homology between these peptides. However, the specific determination of insulin lispro offers advantages over quantifying total concentrations of immunoreactive insulin. We therefore immunized guinea pigs and screened for antibodies with increased affinity and selectivity for insulin lispro. We prepared a monospecific antiserum by a novel immunoadsorption strategy using despentapeptide insulin. The antiserum was used to develop a competitive RIA for insulin lispro. The RIA has a low limit of quantification (17.2 pmol/L); has no interference from insulin, proinsulin, or C-peptide; and has interassay CVs of 2.6-13.4%. The new RIA is useful for measuring serum concentrations of insulin lispro.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1998

The human insulin analogue insulin lispro.

Insulin lispro is a newly developed analogue of human insulin where the positions of the amino acids lysine and proline have been switched at the end of the B chain of the insulin molecule. Insulin lispro with lysine at position B28 and proline at position B29 has a weaker tendency for self-association than human insulin. This leads to three major differences in the pharmacokinetics: the action begins faster, has a higher peak and the duration is shorter than with human insulin. Thus, insulin lispro has a more precise action profile for the mealtime than human regular insulin. Insulin lispro is recommended to be injected within 15 min before the meal in contrast to 30-40 min for human insulin. In clinical trials with insulin lispro, the postprandial rise of blood glucose is smaller, the rate of hypoglycaemia is lower particularly at night-time, the need for snacks is smaller and the patient preference is better than with human insulin. The long-term control as reflected by an improvement in the HbA1c level is better with insulin lispro than with human regular insulin, provided that an appropriate basal insulin regimen is used to take into account the shorter duration of action. A few patients have been described who have a severe resistance to human insulin but who have been successfully treated with insulin lispro. Insulin lispro was designed to be used as a mealtime insulin, and it is a step forward in the treatment of diabetic patients using a basal-bolus insulin regimen.

Blood Glucose↗
PubMed1998

[Spanish experience with insulin lispro].

Insulin lispro is an analog of human insulin created when the amino acids at positions 28 and 29 of the B-chain of insulin are reversed. The natural sequence in human insulin at these positions is proline at B28 and lysine at B29. At physiologic concentrations, insulin lispro exists in solution as a monomer. As such, it's rate of absorption from subcutaneous sites of injection is greater that of regular insulin. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of insulin lispro indicate that it is more rapid-acting, and therefore a more physiological mealtime insulin than regular insulin. In addition, it shows a shorter duration of activity, approximately up to 5 hours. Insulin lispro given 0 to 15 minutes before the meal translate into better glycemic control and less hypoglycemia risk in clinical studies either in type 1 or type 2 diabetes when compare with regular human insulin given 30-45 minutes before meals.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Stability of insulin lispro in insulin infusion systems.

OBJECTIVE: To test stability of insulin lispro in two insulin infusion systems over 48 h. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used reverse-phase and size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to determine the purity, potency, and degree of polymerization of U100 insulin lispro (Humalog) after 24- and 48-h pump cycles conducted at 37 degrees C in five Disetronic H-TRON V100 and five MiniMed 504 pumps. Pumps were set to deliver a basal rate of 0.5 U/h and 6-U boluses at t = 0, 4, 8, 24, 24.5, 28.5, 32.5, and 48 h during each cycle. The effluent was collected into 1-ml vials, pooled at 24 or 48 h, and stored at 4 degrees C until assay. After each 48-h run period of insulin delivery, assays for potency, polymer, and purity were performed on the pooled samples from each individual cycle. m-cresol content and the pooled reservoir content were assayed in the 48-h pooled samples. RESULTS: Insulin lispro retained full HPLC potency (delta < or = 4%) at 48 h, with no degradation of insulin lispro to des-amidoinsulin forms (24 or 48 h). No increase in pumped insulin polymer concentration was observed following 24 h of pump flow. Nonsignificant increases of < or =0.09% (Disetronic) and < or =0.15% (MiniMed) from initial concentrations of 0.18% (polymer divided by total insulin) were detected in three of five pump cycles at 48 h when compared with 37 degrees C paired controls. Nonsignificant decreases (<5 and 10%, Disetronic and MiniMed, respectively) of m-cresol content occurred in both systems following 48 h storage in each device, but sterility was not compromised by this decrease (initial m-cresol concentration, 3.15 mg/ml). Pump performance was without mechanical or electrical fault throughout the study Basal and bolus insulin delivery was evaluated three times daily and remained as expected. Occlusion of catheters by insulin precipitation did not occur, and no change in pH was observed following delivery. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that insulin lispro is suitable for prolonged infusion in these two medical devices when syringes and catheters are replaced at 48-h intervals.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2003

Insulin lispro reduces insulin antibodies in a patient with type 2 diabetes with immunological insulin resistance.

We describe a 54-year-old Japanese female with type 2 diabetes admitted to our hospital with poor metabolic control. On admission the patient's HbA1c was 9.1% despite having taken over 60 U of human insulin per day for the previous 10 years. A high titer of antibodies to insulin was detected in the serum, and therefore, we decided to introduce insulin lispro with the aim of minimizing immunogenicity. Over the next 2 months, the dosage of insulin required to achieve reasonable blood glucose control was reduced, with the HbA1c level decreasing significantly to 6.8%. The patient was subsequently withdrawn from insulin and discharged on diet therapy only. This case demonstrates that insulin lispro may ameliorate resistance to insulin therapy even in the presence of human insulin antibodies.

Autoantibodies↗
PubMed1996

The human insulin analog insulin lispro improves insulin binding on circulating monocytes of intensively treated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients.

The rapidly absorbed analog of human insulin, insulin lispro (LP), is characterized by a faster onset of action, a higher peak insulin level, and a shorter duration of action compared with regular insulin (RI). The aim of this study was to investigate whether intensified treatment with either LP or RI influences insulin receptor status. Twelve patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) participating in a multicenter randomized cross-over trial were allocated to this study. Four patients began with LP, whereas eight patients started with RI. Each patient was switched to the other insulin after a 3-month treatment period. Competitive [125I]A-14-insulin binding studies were performed with isolated monocytes. Treatment with insulin lispro increased the total number of insulin binding sites from 9,400 +/- 2,200 (RI) to 20,300 +/- 3,000 (LP)/monocyte (P < 0.001). The insulin concentration required for a 50% competition of [125I]insulin binding (IC50) decreased from 0.6 +/- 0.2 (RI) to 0.1 +/- 0.03 (LP) nmol/L, indicating significantly higher affinity of insulin binding sites during LP treatment (P < 0.001). In additional experiments, the time course of insulin binding was determined after an oral meal. In LP-treated IDDM patients, the affinity and capacity of insulin binding showed a nadir 1 h after insulin injection and a regained binding affinity and capacity 5 h later. These changes observed after LP treatment were comparable to the effect of endogenous insulin secretion in healthy control subjects. In contrast, the IDDM patients who injected RI showed a decreasing insulin binding affinity and capacity, most markedly expressed after 5 h. The corresponding serum levels of insulin were inversely correlated with the affinity and capacity of insulin-binding sites. Pretreatment of cultured human IM-9 lymphoblasts with LP or RI yielded no difference in the down-regulation of insulin binding. In summary, intensified conventional insulin therapy with LP increased the number and affinity of insulin receptors on circulating monocytes to a level similar to that observed in healthy subjects. We conclude that the improved insulin receptor status observed during LP treatment is caused by its more physiological pharmacokinetic profile.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Insulin lispro and regular insulin in pregnancy.

We assessed the safety of insulin lispro in gestational, type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, analysing 635 pregnancies over a period of 7 years. We also evaluated patient satisfaction, sending an internationally-accepted anonymous diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire to 22 patients (three type 1, 19 gestational diabetes) who received regular and lispro insulin in successive pregnancies. The success rate of pregnancies in women with gestational diabetes managed with diet alone (n=325) was 99.3%. All 213 pregnancies in women with gestational diabetes requiring insulin were successful. There was no difference in maternal or fetal outcomes whether patients used regular insulin (n=138) or insulin lispro (n=75), but pre-delivery HbA1c was lower with insulin lispro (p<0.05). Pregnancy loss in patients with pre-gestational diabetes (89 pregnancies in type 1 and eight in type 2 diabetes) was 18.6% for insulin and 3.7% for insulin lispro (p=0.10). The incidences of congenital anomalies with regular insulin were 7.9% and 15.8% in gestational and pre-gestational diabetes, respectively; the figures for insulin lispro were 6.6% (p=0.79) and 3.8% ( p=0.16), respectively. Nineteen of the 22 surveyed patients completed the questionnaire. Satisfaction was higher with insulin lispro (26.3+/-2.3 vs. 18+/-8.9, p=0.0005). We found no increase in adverse outcome using lispro insulin in diabetic pregnancies, in either gestational or pre-gestational diabetes. Patient satisfaction favoured insulin lispro. Several patients with type 1 diabetes who used regular insulin during pregnancy, chose lispro after delivery, but all who used lispro in pregnancy preferred to continue.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Lispro insulin in type 1 diabetic patients on a Mediterranean or normal diet: a randomized, cross-over comparative study with regular insulin.

Lispro (LP) and regular human (HR) insulins were compared in Type 1 diabetic (T1DM) patients on either a Mediterranean diet or normal diet. Twelve T1DM patients were recruited and randomized into two groups of 6, groups A and B. They were treated in different sequences (in 3-month intervals for 1 year). Group A: LP insulin and normal diet, LP insulin and Mediterranean diet, regular insulin and Mediterranean diet, regular insulin and normal diet. Group B: regular insulin and normal diet, regular insulin and Mediterranean diet, LP insulin and Mediterranean diet, LP insulin and normal diet. Each patient was treated with rapid acting insulin, either LP insulin or HR insulin, before each main meal and a dose of slow acting insulin at bedtime. Every 15 days the glycemic control, the incidence and frequency of hypoglycemic episodes, and any adverse events were evaluated. Every 3 months, hematology and a chemistry panel, pre- and post-prandial glycemic and insulinemic profiles were evaluated in all patients. HbA1c levels significantly decreased in LP patients on normal diet, post-prandial glycemic levels were significantly lower in LP than in HR patients from 30 min onwards, 15-min post-prandial insulin levels higher in LP- than in HR-treated patients, and hypoglycemic episodes were significantly less in LP- than in HR-treated patients. LP insulin, irrespective of the type of diet, results in more effective glycemic control, significantly reduces hypoglycemic episodes as opposed to traditional insulin therapy and seems to be more effective with a normal diet than with a Mediterranean diet.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Switch to multiple daily injections with insulin glargine and insulin lispro from continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with insulin lispro: a randomized, open-label study using a continuous glucose monitoring system.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the transition from a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) regimen with insulin lispro to 1 of 2 dose regimens of multiple daily injections (MDI) with insulin lispro and insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: The study group consisted of 38 patients with type 1 diabetes who had been using CSII with insulin lispro for > or =6 months. These patients were randomized to receive insulin glargine at a dose equal to (group 1:1) or 1.2 times (group 1:1.2) the mean of their total daily CSII basal insulin dose. Data were obtained by continuous interstitial glucose measurement at baseline and for 7 days of MDI. RESULTS: The switch to MDI was associated with a transient deterioration in glycemic control on day 1 in the 1:1 treatment group, which stabilized thereafter. Glucose variability did not increase significantly from baseline in either group on days 1 and 2 after the switch in treatment but increased significantly on day 4 in the 1:1 group for mean amplitude of glucose excursion and in the 1:1.2 group for SD, M-value, and mean amplitude of glucose excursion. Rates of hypoglycemia did not change significantly in either study group after the switch in treatment, but the 1:1 group showed a trend toward less nocturnal hypoglycemia. There were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia, and patients in both groups experienced significantly less time at glucose values <70 mg/dL on day 1 after the switch in comparison with baseline. CONCLUSION: MDI with insulin glargine and insulin lispro provide a safe transition for patients taking "pump holidays" without clinically significant disruptions of glycemic control. The recommended dose of insulin glargine after the switch in treatment is equal to the total daily basal dose on CSII.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Intramuscular versus subcutaneous injection of soluble and lispro insulin: comparison of metabolic effects in healthy subjects.

The aim of this study was to compare the glucodynamic effects of soluble insulin and the rapid acting insulin analogue insulin lispro after subcutaneous (s.c.) and intramuscular (i.m.) injection. Twelve healthy male volunteers (age 26.8 +/- 1.7 years, BMI 23.2 +/- 2.3 kg m(-2); mean +/- SD) participated in this single-centre, open-labelled, euglycaemic glucose clamp study on four different days. Soluble insulin or insulin lispro (0.2 U kg(-1)) were injected s.c. or i.m. into the thigh by syringe. The glucodynamic effects were assessed by registering the glucose infusion rates necessary to maintain blood glucose at 5.0 mmol l(-1) for the subsequent 420 min. Intramuscular injection of soluble insulin led to an earlier peak of metabolic action when compared to s.c. administered soluble insulin (tmax 138 +/- 29 vs 179 +/- 34 min; p < 0.05). The maximal metabolic effect and metabolic activity during the first 2 h after i.m. and s.c. injection of soluble insulin were comparable (GIRmax 9.7 +/- 2.3 vs 7.8 +/- 2.3 mg kg(-1) min(-1); n.s., AUC0-120min 0.60 +/- 0.18 vs 0.50 +/- 0.15 g kg(-1) 120 min; n.s.). Subcutaneous administration of insulin lispro led to a metabolic effect resembling that induced by i.m. application of soluble insulin (tmax 116 +/- 26 vs 138 +/- 29 min; n.s., GIRmax 11.1 +/- 2.3 mg vs 9.7 +/- mg kg(-1) min(-1); n.s.). However, the overall metabolic response during the first 2 h after injection was higher with s.c. insulin lispro (AUC0-120min 0.81 +/- 0.26 vs 0.60 +/- 0.18 g kg(-1) 120 min; p < 0.05). The glucodynamic activity of i.m. applied insulin lispro was comparable to that of lispro s.c.. Following i.m. injection of soluble insulin, the metabolic activity peaked more rapidly than with s.c. administration. In contrast, the metabolic effect of insulin lispro was similar with either route. The time-action profile of i.m. injected soluble insulin lies between that of s.c. applied soluble insulin and insulin lispro.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Injection site effects on the pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of insulin lispro and regular insulin.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of a new insulin analog, insulin lispro, and regular human insulin were compared and contrasted after subcutaneous administrations in femoral, deltoid, and abdominal injection sites. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Single 0.2 U/kg doses of insulin lispro and regular insulin were administered to 12 healthy subjects in a six-way randomized crossover fashion. Each dose was given after an overnight fast in one of three injection sites: abdominal, deltoid, or femoral. Study drugs were given during a manual euglycemic glucose clamp. Blood samples were collected over the 12-h clamp for measurement of insulin-reactive components, with pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic measurements derived from these serum insulin and clamp measurements. RESULTS: Glucodynamic comparisons between insulin lispro and regular insulin showed a greater maximum infusion rate (Rmax) at an earlier time (TRmax), regardless of injection site. The total glucose infused (Gtot) showed nearly identical values between sites for insulin lispro. Regular insulin showed greater Gtot values from deltoid and femoral injections. When comparisons were made between drugs, regular insulin produced significantly greater Gtot, primarily driven by the increased Gtot from deltoid and femoral injections. Greater maximum serum insulin concentrations (Cmax) were experienced with insulin lispro at earlier times (tmax), regardless of the injection site (P < 0.001). Abdominal administrations produced the greatest Cmax values at the earliest tmax for both regular insulin and insulin lispro. Deltoid and femoral injections had lower Cmax values for both compounds. Shifts also occurred with tmax, although these shifts were much greater with regular insulin than with insulin lispro. Equivalent area under the curve (AUC) values were found when compared between compounds. CONCLUSIONS: Slower absorption from deltoid and femoral administrations resulted in an increased duration of action for both regular insulin and insulin lispro when compared to abdominal administration. However, notable increases in the onset of action were only apparent with regular insulin. The consistency with insulin lispro response from abdominal and extremity injection sites allows more potential sites for subcutaneous injection with an assured rapid response.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1998

Time-action profiles of novel premixed preparations of insulin lispro and NPL insulin.

OBJECTIVE: To study the pharmacodynamic properties of three premixed formulations of the rapid-acting insulin analog insulin lispro and its protamine-retarded preparation, neutral protamine lispro (NPL) insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this open, single-center, euglycemic glucose clamp study, 30 healthy volunteers (12 women, 18 men) aged 27 +/- 2 years (mean +/- SD), whose BMI was 23.0 +/- 2.3 kg/m2, received subcutaneous injections of 0.3 U/kg body wt of insulin mixture (high-mixture 75/25, mid-mixture 50/50, or low-mixture 25/75 insulin lispro/NPL insulin), insulin lispro, or NPL insulin on one of the five study days in randomized order. Glucose infusion rates were determined over a period of 24 h after administration. RESULTS: Maximal metabolic activity decreased after subcutaneous injection of the mixtures with lower insulin lispro content; however, the time point of maximal and of early half-maximal metabolic activity was comparable among the three mixtures. Higher proportions of insulin lispro resulted in higher values for area under the curve within the first 360 min after injection and a more rapid decline to late half-maximal activity. Serum insulin concentrations showed a similar pattern. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of insulin lispro are preserved in stable mixtures with NPL insulin.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Modified hyperinsulinaemic, eu- and hypoglycaemic clamp technique using lispro-insulin for insulinoma diagnostic.

SUMMARY: Characterization of metabolically inadequate insulin secretion is essential for insulinoma diagnostics. Hyperinsulinaemic, eu- and hypoglycaemic clamp procedures have been used to suppress endogenous insulin secretion in healthy subjects. The use of exogenous insulin precluded the use of insulin as a parameter to be measured. We now suggest to use exogenous insulin lispro and an insulin-specific ELISA not cross reacting with insulin lispro. Thus, determination of insulin by ELISA in this experimental setting reflects endogenous insulin. A 39-year-old man with a surgically confirmed pancreatic insulinoma was studied under hyperinsulinaemic [lispro insulin 40 mU x m(-2) body surface x min(-1)] clamp conditions. Euglycaemia was achieved (3.8 +/- 0.5 mmol/L) for 1 h and hypoglycaemia (2.36 +/- 0.49 mmol/L) was achieved for another 30 min. Insulin was evaluated by ELISA (cross-reaction with lispro insulin < 0.006%, C-peptide < 0.01%, proinsulin < 0.001%) and by a nonselective RIA (cross-reaction with proinsulin 40%). In control subjects the euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemia suppressed C-peptide to 0.36 +/- 0.03 ng/ml and hypoglycaemic hyperinsulinaemia to 0.29 +/- 0.03 ng/ml. Endogenous insulin was suppressed to 2.8 +/- 0.03 mU/L under euglycaemia and to 2.6 +/- 0.03 mU/L under hypoglycaemia in control subjects. In the insulinoma patient apparently irregular but small changes in both C-peptide (1.43 +/- 0.1 ng/ml) and more pronounced changes in endogenous insulin concentrations 4.41 +/- 0.1 mU/l under euglycaemia and 5.35 +/- 0.3 mU/l under hypoglycaemic conditions, were observed. The basal level of insulin (ELISA insulin 4.6 mU/L) and C-peptide (1.7 ng/ml) were not markedly elevated. Determination of insulin allowed better characterization of irregular pulses because of the shorter half-life of insulin relative to C-peptide. The new modification of sequential eu- and hypoglycaemic clamp procedures should also be useful in pharmacological studies of insulinotropic substances. Direct measurement of peripheral insulin may be more sensitive than C-peptide to detect low levels of autonomous insulin secretion in small insulinomas.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Maternal metabolic control and perinatal outcome in women with gestational diabetes treated with regular or lispro insulin: comparison with non-diabetic pregnant women.

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal glucose levels and neonatal outcome, achieved in women with gestational diabetes (GDM) receiving either regular insulin or insulin lispro, with those of a control group of non-diabetic pregnant women. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled 49 pregnant women with GDM, randomly allocated to the treatment with either insulin lispro (n=25) or regular insulin (n=24), and 50 pregnant women with normal GCT, matched for age, parity, pre-pregnancy weight and BMI, who formed the control group. All the women were caucasian, non-obese, with a singleton pregnancy and delivered term live born infants. Women of both groups were requested to perform a blood glucose profile (consisting of nine determinations: fasting/pre-prandial, 1 and 2h post-prandial) every week from the time of diagnosis to 38 weeks (study subgroups) or every 2 weeks from 28 to 38 weeks' gestation (control group). RESULTS: Overall pre-prandial blood glucose values in diabetic women were significantly higher than those of controls; at the 1h post-prandial time point, blood glucose values of GDM women receiving insulin lispro were similar to those of controls, whereas in the regular group they were significantly higher. Overall, both the lispro and regular insulin obtained optimal metabolic control at the 2h post-prandial time point, although near-normal blood glucose levels 2h after lunch could be observed only in the lispro group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in neonatal outcome and anthropometric characteristics; however, the rate of infants with a cranial-thoracic circumference (CC/CT) ratio between the 10th and the 25th percentile was significantly higher in the group treated with regular insulin in comparison to the lispro and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fasting/pre-prandial and 1h post-prandial maternal blood glucose levels in non-diabetic pregnant women fell well below the currently accepted criteria of glycemic normality in diabetic pregnancies. In women with GDM, the use of insulin lispro enabled the attainment of near-normal glucose levels at the 1h post-prandial time point and was associated with normal anthropometric characteristics; the use of regular insulin was not able to blunt the 1h peak post-prandial response to a near-normal extent and resulted in infants with a tendency toward the disproportionate growth. Insulin lispro can be regarded as a valuable option for the treatment of gestational diabetes.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Insulin lispro versus regular insulin in children with type 1 diabetes on twice daily insulin.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of insulin lispro with regular insulin in 5- to 10-yr-old prepubertal children on twice daily insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-five children (16 M, 19 F) completed an open-label randomised crossover study, with each child receiving insulin lispro for 3 months and regular insulin for 3 months in addition to their intermediate-acting insulin. Families were instructed to give regular insulin 30 min before meals and insulin lispro immediately before meals. Glycaemic control was monitored by eight-point blood glucose profiles and six weekly hemoglobin A1cs (HbA1cs) and the frequency and severity of hypoglycaemia was documented. RESULTS: The endpoint HbA1c after 3 months on insulin lispro (8.33%, SD+/-0.89) was not significantly different to that on regular insulin (8.14%, SD+/-0.77). No significant differences were found in blood glucose levels before or after meals, 2-h postprandial glucose excursions or in blood glucose levels before bed between the treatments. However, blood glucose levels at 3 am were significantly lower on regular insulin than on insulin lispro (mean difference -2.35 mmol/L (95%CI: -3.98, -0.72, p=0.01). There was no significant difference in the frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The main advantage of insulin lispro in children on twice daily insulin was found to be its greater convenience, this being achieved without a deterioration in glycaemic control. The higher 3 am blood glucose levels in those on insulin lispro could translate to reduced nocturnal hypoglycaemia in some individuals.

Clinical Trial↗