Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Indinavir”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Efavirenz plus zidovudine and lamivudine, efavirenz plus indinavir, and indinavir plus zidovudine and lamivudine in the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults. Study 006 Team.

BACKGROUND: Efavirenz is a nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). We compared two regimens containing efavirenz, one with a protease inhibitor and the other with two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, with a standard three-drug regimen. METHODS: The study subjects were 450 patients who had not previously been treated with lamivudine or any nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor or protease inhibitor. In this open-label study, patients were randomly assigned to one of three regimens: efavirenz (600 mg daily) plus zidovudine (300 mg twice daily) and lamivudine (150 mg twice daily); the protease inhibitor indinavir (800 mg every eight hours) plus zidovudine and lamivudine; or efavirenz plus indinavir (1000 mg every eight hours). RESULTS: Suppression of plasma HIV-1 RNA to undetectable levels was achieved in more patients in the group given efavirenz plus nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors than in the group given indinavir plus nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (70 percent vs. 48 percent, P<0.001). The efficacy of the regimen of efavirenz plus indinavir was similar (53 percent) to that of the regimen of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine. CD4 cell counts increased significantly with all combinations (range of increases, 180 to 201 cells per cubic millimeter). More patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events in the group given indinavir and two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors than in the group given efavirenz and two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (43 percent vs. 27 percent, P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: As antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected adults, the combination of efavirenz, zidovudine, and lamivudine has greater antiviral activity and is better tolerated than the combination of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Randomized, double-blind trial comparing indinavir alone, zidovudine alone and indinavir plus zidovudine in antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell counts between 50 and 250/mm3.

Treatment with indinavir has been shown to result in marked decreases in viral load and increases in CD4 cell counts in HIV-infected individuals. A randomized double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy of indinavir alone (800 mg q8h), zidovidine alone (200 mg q8h) or the combination was performed to evaluate progression to AIDS. 996 antiretroviral therapy-naive patients with CD4 cell counts of 50-250/mm3 were allocated to treatment. During the trial the protocol was amended to add lamivudine to the zidovudine-containing arms. The primary endpoint was time to development of an AIDS-defining illness or death. The study was terminated after a protocol-defined interim analysis demonstrated highly significant reductions in progression to a clinical event in the indinavir-containing arms, compared to the zidovudine arm (p<0. 0001). Over a median follow-up of 52 weeks (up to 99 weeks), percent reductions in hazards for the indinavir plus zidovudine and indinavir groups compared to the zidovudine group were 70% and 61%, respectively. Significant reductions in HIV RNA and increases in CD4 cell counts were also seen in the indinavir-containing groups compared to the zidovudine group. Improvement in both CD4 cell count and HIV RNA were associated with reduced risk of disease progression. All three regimens were generally well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Low plasma concentrations of indinavir are related to virological treatment failure in HIV-1-infected patients on indinavir-containing triple therapy.

All human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients who started to use indinavir (800 mg three times a day) as part of their triple drug regimen were included in a study to determine the importance of low plasma concentrations of indinavir as a cause of virological treatment failure. The indinavir concentration and a number of patient characteristics at baseline were tested as risk factors for virological treatment failure (defined as a viral load above 200 copies/ml after 24 weeks of treatment) in univariate and multivariate analyses; 65 patients were included. Virological treatment failure occurred in 36.9% of the patients. Multivariate analysis showed that a low plasma concentration of indinavir (odds ratio 0.1), a high viral load at baseline (odds ratio 2.6) and pretreatment with another protease inhibitor (odds ratio 10.0) were independent factors related to virological treatment failure. Monitoring of indinavir plasma concentrations may be an important tool for the optimization of triple drug combination therapy.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1998

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study of delavirdine and indinavir in healthy volunteers.

The potential pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between delavirdine, a nonnucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and indinavir, an inhibitor of HIV protease, was evaluated in healthy volunteers. Subjects received a single 800-mg dose of indinavir sulfate on day 1 (baseline). Delavirdine mesylate 400 mg was administered three times daily on days 2 through 10. On day 9, a single 400-mg dose and on day 10 a single 600-mg dose of indinavir were given along with morning doses of delavirdine. Pharmacokinetic evaluations of indinavir were made on days 1, 9, and 10, and of delavirdine on days 8, 9, and 10. Fourteen healthy male volunteers completed the study. Single doses of indinavir had no clinically important effects on the pharmacokinetics of delavirdine. Mean indinavir Cmax values for the 400-mg and 600-mg doses administered concomitantly with delavirdine were dose proportionally lower than that observed following the 800-mg dose administered alone. Mean Tmax values were similar and ranged from 1.0 +/- 0.3/hour for indinavir 800 mg administered alone to 1.3 +/- 0.4/hour for indinavir 600 mg administered with delavirdine. These results indicate that delavirdine had no clinically important effect on the rate of indinavir absorption. In contrast, the mean indinavir AUC0-infinity, value following the 400-mg dose administered with delavirdine was only 14% lower than the baseline value determined for the 800-mg indinavir dose (25,400 +/- 6960 nM hour versus 29,600 +/- 7920 nM hour), and the mean indinavir AUC0-infinity value for the 600-mg indinavir dose administered with delavirdine (42,700 +/- 9800 nM hour) was 44% greater than the baseline value. All differences among mean AUC0-infinity values were statistically significant. Mean indinavir half-life values were slightly longer when indinavir was given in a dose with delavirdine than when indinavir was administered alone. These results suggest that delavirdine inhibits metabolism of indinavir and support the possibility of a reduction in the magnitude or frequency of indinavir dosage when given in combination with delavirdine.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Urological complaints in relation to indinavir plasma concentrations in HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between indinavir-associated urological complaints and indinavir plasma concentrations. DESIGN: Case series, comparing indinavir plasma concentrations in cases with average concentrations in a control group. METHODS: Patients taking 800 mg indinavir three times a day (tid), who presented with overt urological complaints (renal colic, flank pain or haematuria) were selected for the study. Plasma indinavir concentrations were measured by means of a standardized high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. Plasma samples taken at 1.5-8 h after the last indinavir ingestion were included for evaluation. Results were compared with the full pharmacokinetic curves of indinavir plasma concentrations from a control group of 14 patients taking 800 mg indinavir tid without urological complaints, and were expressed as concentration ratios. A ratio of 1 indicated a plasma concentration equalling the average concentration in the control population at the same point in time after the ingestion of indinavir. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (five women) were enrolled and the indinavir concentrations of 15 patients could be evaluated. Fourteen (93%) patients had a concentration above the mean of the controls, 12 (80%) patients had a concentration above the upper 95% confidence limit, and one (7%) patient had a concentration below the lower 95% confidence limit. The mean indinavir concentration in patients with urological complaints (ratio range 0.55-11.49) was significantly higher than the average concentration and the upper 95% confidence limit of the control group (P < 0.05). The results could not be explained by differences in weight, sex or drug interactions. Two patients had chronic active hepatitis B infection. In six patients with indinavir concentrations above the upper 95% limit, indinavir was reduced to 600 mg tid. Upon repeat measurement after the dose adjustment, their indinavir plasma concentrations fell within the 95% confidence interval around the mean of the control population. All six patients remained asymptomatic and had viral loads of less than 500 copies per ml after a follow-up of 5-16 months. CONCLUSIONS: Urological complications occurring during indinavir treatment were associated with elevated indinavir plasma concentrations in 80% of patients in this study. Indinavir plasma concentrations should be monitored upon presentation of urological complaints, on the basis of which dose reductions may be applied if brief interruption and increased hydration are ineffective.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Indinavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection.

Indinavir is a protease inhibitor used in the treatment of patients with HIV infection. Combination antiretroviral therapy with indinavir plus 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is associated with greater reductions in viral load, greater increases in CD4+ cell counts, and reduced morbidity and mortality when compared with 2 NRTIs alone. In the landmark clinical trial ACTG 320, the rate of progression to AIDS or death (primary end-point) among zidovudine-experienced patients treated with indinavir, zidovudine and lamivudine was approximately half that of patients who received only zidovudine plus lamivudine (6 vs 11%; p < 0.001). The durability of an indinavir-containing regimen was demonstrated in Merck protocol 035, an ongoing trial in which a significant proportion of patients had sustained viral suppression for up to 3 years. Merck protocol 039, also an ongoing trial, showed a greater effect on surrogate markers of HIV disease progression with indinavir-based triple therapy than with zidovudine plus lamivudine or indinavir monotherapy in patients with advanced disease (median baseline CD4+ count 15 cells/microL). Numerous additional clinical trials have established the beneficial antiviral and immunological effects of indinavir in both antiretroviral-naive and -experienced patients with HIV infection. Indinavir is associated with various drug class-related adverse events, including gastrointestinal disturbances (e.g. nausea, diarrhoea), headache and asthenia/fatigue. A lipodystrophy syndrome has been commonly reported with indinavir and other protease inhibitors combined with NRTIs, but it has also been reported in many protease inhibitor-naive patients, and a definitive causal link has not been established between the syndrome and protease inhibitors. Nephrolithiasis may develop in about 9% of patients receiving indinavir but does not appear to be associated with other protease inhibitors; <0.5% of patients receiving indinavir discontinue the drug because of nephrolithiasis, which may be the extreme end of a continuum of crystal-related renal syndromes. Additional renal problems (e.g. nephropathy) have been reported in small numbers of patients receiving indinavir. In summary, indinavir is a protease inhibitor with well documented efficacy when used as part of combined therapy in patients with HIV infection. Both US and UK treatment guidelines continue to recommend protease inhibitor-based regimens including indinavir as a first-line option. Indinavir is being studied as a twice daily and once daily regimen with a low dosage of ritonavir as a way to alleviate tolerability, drug interaction and patient compliance/adherence issues. Indinavir-containing triple therapy has demonstrated positive effects not only on surrogate markers of disease progression, but also on clinical end-points of mortality and morbidity in patients with HIV disease. Protease inhibitors are a significant advance in the care of patients with HIV infection, and, in an era of evidence-based medicine, indinavir represents an important component of antiretroviral treatment strategies.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Pharmacokinetic interaction between ritonavir and indinavir in healthy volunteers.

The pharmacokinetic interaction between indinavir and ritonavir was evaluated in five groups of healthy adult volunteers to explore the potential for twice-daily (b.i.d.) dosing of this combination. All subjects received 800 mg of indinavir every 8 h (q8h) on day 2. In addition, subjects in group I received one dose of 800 mg of indinavir on day 1 and 800 mg of indinavir q8h on day 17. Subjects in Groups II and IV each received one dose of 600 mg of indinavir on days 1 and 17, and subjects in groups III and V each received one dose of 400 mg of indinavir on days 1 and 17. During days 3 to 17, ritonavir placebo or ritonavir at 200, 300, 300, or 400 mg q12h was given to groups I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. Ritonavir at steady state probably inhibited the cytochrome P-450 3A metabolism of indinavir and substantially increased plasma indinavir concentrations, with the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increasing up to 475% and the peak concentration in serum (Cmax) increasing up to 110%. The Cmax/trough concentration ratio decreased from 50 in standard q8h regimens to less than 14 when indinavir was administered with ritonavir. For a constant indinavir dose, an increase in the ritonavir dose yielded similar indinavir AUCs, Cmaxs, and concentrations at 12 h (C12s). For a constant ritonavir dose, an increase in the indinavir dose resulted in approximately proportional increases in the indinavir AUC, less than proportional increases in Cmax, and slightly more than proportional increases in C12. Ritonavir reduced between-subject variability in the indinavir AUC and trough concentrations and did not affect indinavir renal clearance. With the altered pharmacokinetic profile, indinavir likely could be given as a b.i.d. combination regimen with ritonavir. This could potentially improve patient compliance and thereby reduce treatment failures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Species differences in the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of indinavir, a potent human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor.

Indinavir, a potent and specific inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus protease, is undergoing clinical investigation for the treatment of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. The studies described herein were designed to characterize the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of the drug in rats, dogs, and monkeys. Indinavir exhibited marked species differences in elimination kinetics. The plasma clearance was in the rank order: rat (107 ml/min/kg) > monkey (36 ml/min/kg) > dog (16 ml/min/kg). Significant differences in the bioavailability of indinavir also were observed. When given orally as a solution in 0.05 M citric acid, the bioavailability varied significantly from 72% in the dog to 19% in the monkey, and 24% in the rat. These differences in bioavailability were attributed mainly to species differences in the magnitude of hepatic first-pass metabolism. The distribution of indinavir was studied only in rats, both intravenously and orally. Intravenously, indinavir was distributed widely throughout the body. Brain uptake studies showed that indinavir penetrated the blood-brain barrier, but that the penetration was limited. After oral administration, indinavir was distributed rapidly into and out of the lymphatic system. The rapid lymph transfer is of clinical relevance, because a primary clinical hallmark of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is the depletion of CD4 lymphocytes. Biliary and urinary recovery studies revealed that metabolism was the major route of indinavir elimination in all species, and N-dealkylation, N-oxidation, and hydroxylation seemed to be the major pathways. Although limited to qualitative aspects, the metabolite profile obtained from in vitro microsomal studies generally reflected the in vivo oxidative metabolism of indinavir in all species studies. Results from the chemical and immunochemical inhibition studies indicated the possible involvement of isoforms of the CYP3A subfamily in the oxidative metabolism of indinavir in rats, dogs, and monkeys. This is consistent with our previous studies, which have shown that CYP3A4 is the isoform responsible for the oxidative metabolism of indinavir in human liver microsomes. Furthermore, the in vivo oxidative metabolism of indinavir in rats, dogs, and monkeys was qualitatively similar to that in humans. The high degree of similarity in the metabolite profiles of drug metabolism between animals and humans validates the use of these animal models for toxicity studies of indinavir. Attempts were made to quantitatively extrapolate in vitro metabolic data to in vivo metabolism. With the application of the well-stirred and parallel-tube models, the hepatic clearance and hepatic extraction ratio were calculated using the in vitro Vmax/Km values. In rats, the predicted hepatic clearance (31 ml/ min/kg) and hepatic extraction ratio (0.47) agreed well with the observed in vivo hepatic clearance (43 ml/min/kg) and hepatic extraction ratio (0.68). In addition, the hepatic clearance of indinavir was predicted reasonably well in dogs and monkeys. Based on the in vitro intrinsic clearance of human liver microsomes, a small but significant hepatic first-pass metabolism (ca. 25%) is expected in humans.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Effect of fluconazole on indinavir pharmacokinetics in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.

To evaluate a potential pharmacokinetic interaction of coadministration of fluconazole, and indinavir, a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitor, 13 patients were enrolled in a multiple-dose, three-period, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive indinavir at 1,000 mg every 8 h for 7 1/3 days (with fluconazole placebo), fluconazole at 400 mg once daily for 8 days (with indinavir placebo), and indinavir with fluconazole in combination. The pharmacokinetics of both drugs were measured on day 8 of each treatment period. The peak concentration in plasma (Cmax) and the time to reach Cmax were obtained by inspection, and the area under curve (AUC) was calculated for indinavir and fluconazole for each treatment period in which the respective drugs were administered. There was a marginally (P = 0.08) statistically significant decrease in the AUC from 0 to 8 h (AUC(0-8)) for indinavir when it was administered with fluconazole. However, the magnitudes of the decreases in Cmax and the concentration at 8 h postdosing (C8) were not as great as the decrease in AUC(0-8). Although the 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean ratio was within the hypothesized limits, the clinical significance is not clear. Indinavir coadministration with fluconazole had no statistically (P > 0.5) or clinically significant effect on the Cmax and C8 of indinavir. Fluconazole coadministration with indinavir had no statistically or clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of fluconazole. One patient was discontinued because of mild to moderate abdominal pain and diarrhea while on indinavir and fluconazole in combination. No serious adverse experience according to the results of laboratory tests was noted. Total bilirubin levels in serum were mildly increased in most patients treated with indinavir. This was not clinically significant and was not affected by the coadministration of fluconazole. Although the values of the pharmacokinetic parameters for indinavir decrease in the presence of fluconazole, indinavir and fluconazole can be administered concomitantly to HIV-infected patients without adjustment of the dose of either drug, and both drugs are generally well tolerated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

The steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of indinavir alone and in combination with a low dose of ritonavir in twice daily dosing regimens in HIV-1-infected individuals.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of indinavir in twice daily dosing regimens with and without the co-administration of 100 mg ritonavir. DESIGN: Observational pharmacokinetic study. PATIENTS: HIV-1-infected individuals who use indinavir alone (1200 mg twice daily, n = 6), or the combination of 100 mg ritonavir twice daily plus either 800 mg (n = 6), or 1200 mg indinavir twice daily (n = 2). METHODS: Steady-state pharmacokinetics of indinavir and ritonavir were assessed by drawing 12 blood samples during an 8-h period after ingestion of the medication. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed for indinavir pharmacokinetics between the dosing regimens indinavir 1200 mg twice daily alone and indinavir/ ritonavir 800/100 mg twice daily with respect to the mean trough concentration (0.21 and 0.99 microg/ml, respectively, P = 0.002), the mean maximum concentration (13.79 and 8.74 microg/ml, respectively, P = 0.028), and for the mean plasma elimination half-life (1.6 and 3.2 h, respectively, P = 0.001). The combination indinavir/ritonavir 1200/100 mg twice daily led to very high exposure to indinavir and was not well tolerated. However, the combination indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg twice daily was well tolerated and resulted in therapeutic concentrations of indinavir with improved trough concentrations and similar maximum concentrations as observed with the licensed dosage of 800 mg three times daily. CONCLUSION: Combination of indinavir and 100 mg ritonavir in twice daily dosing regimens significantly affects the pharmacokinetic profile of indinavir. The results of this observational study provide a pharmacologic basis for the combination of indinavir (800 mg) and ritonavir (100 mg) in twice daily dosing regimens.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Stimulation of vitamin A(1) acid signaling by the HIV protease inhibitor indinavir.

HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) are effective drugs for the treatment of AIDS. However, PI therapy is sometimes associated with side-effects including increased plasma lipids and altered body fat distribution, although fat redistribution may occur in some patients not treated with PIs. Overdosage with vitamin A(1) acid (all-trans-retinoic acid, ATRA) or its metabolites may cause similar changes in lipid metabolism. Moreover, the PI indinavir and retinoids have been associated with nail, skin, and hair defects, suggesting that indinavir and retinoids may exert their effects through similar molecular mechanisms. This hypothesis was tested by examining the effects of PIs on retinoid signaling in vitro. Mesenchymal stem cells (C3H10T1/2) were cultured in the presence of various PIs (amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir) and synthetic retinoids, and the metabolic response was assessed by measuring the activity of a retinoid-regulated protein, alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Of the PIs tested, only indinavir stimulated ATRA-dependent ALP activity and altered stem cell morphology; the effects of indinavir occurred in the presence of ATRA, but not in its absence. Moreover, indinavir increased the effects of ATRA on lipid accumulation during fat cell differentiation. AGN 193109 (4-[[5,6-dihydro-5, 5-dimethyl-8-(4-methylphenyl)-2-naphthalenyl]ethynyl]-benzoic acid), a retinoic acid receptor (RAR) antagonist, inhibited the synergistic effects of indinavir and ATRA, indicating that indinavir increases RAR signaling. However, indinavir did not potentiate ALP activity in the presence of the RAR agonist CH55 (3,5-di-tert-butylchalcone 4'-carboxylic acid). Unlike ATRA, CH55 does not bind to cytosolic retinoic acid binding protein (CRABP), suggesting that CRABP may regulate the effects of indinavir on RAR signaling. These observations support the proposal that altered retinoid signaling promotes some of the adverse reactions associated with indinavir therapy, such as altered lipid metabolism.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Determination of indinavir, a HIV-1 protease inhibitor, in human plasma using ion-pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.

Indinavir is widely prescribed as a component of potent antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Because virologic failure of therapy can result from subtherapeutic drug levels, monitoring of indinavir levels may be important in clinical management. We have developed a simple, accurate, and precise high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay for measurement of indinavir concentration in human plasma. In our method, indinavir was extracted from plasma with dichloromethane at pH 10.4, which resulted in quantitative recovery of indinavir and the internal standard (IS), methyl-indinavir (86% and 80%-97%, respectively). Chromatographic separation was accomplished using a Luna C18 (2) (Phenomenex) analytic column with a mobile phase composed of acetonitrile:phosphate buffer (25 mM) and 0.2% triethylamine pH 7.0 (34.5:65.5, v/v). Ion-paired reagent triethylamine was necessary to ensure an appropriate retention time for indinavir and differentiate it from other protease inhibitors that were coextracted. Quantification was performed at 210 nm. The standard curves were linear (r2>0.999) over the concentration range 25-5,000 ng/mL, when 1-mL aliquots of plasma were extracted. Inter- and intraday coefficients of variation were acceptable. The assay was used to determine trough and peak levels of in plasma from 12 subjects who received indinavir 1200 mg every 12 hours, 1000 mg every 12 hours, or 800 mg every 8 hours. The concentrations of indinavir found in this study (trough 26-768 ng/mL; peak at 1 hr 3,309-17,568 ng/mL) has a wider range than defined previously (trough 50-300 ng/mL; peak 6,000-12,000 ng/mL). This study illustrates three potential uses of indinavir monitoring: to assess individual dosing regimen, to assess patient compliance, and to monitor unusual indinavir levels caused by changed drug clearance.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed1998

Visceral abdominal-fat accumulation associated with use of indinavir.

BACKGROUND: After the addition of the protease inhibitor indinavir to combination drug regimens for HIV-1 infection, some patients have experienced an increase in abdominal girth with symptoms of abdominal fullness, distension, or bloating. We aimed to find out whether this collection of symptoms was associated with changes in abdominal fat and whether such changes were associated with indinavir use. METHODS: Abdominal computed tomography was used in ten HIV-1-positive patients who had such abdominal symptoms to measure total adipose tissue (TAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) at the umbilicus (L4 vertebral level). The VAT:TAT ratio in the ten cases was compared with that in ten HIV-1-infected patients who had been using indinavir without abdominal symptoms for at least 6 months and ten HIV-1-infected patients who were not using indinavir. FINDINGS: The mean VAT:TAT ratios for the three groups-non-users, symptom-free indinavir users, and symptomatic indinavir users-were 0.40 (SD 0.15), 0.59 (0.18), and 0.70 (0.20), respectively (p=0.004). The VAT:TAT ratio correlated with duration of indinavir use (r=0.47, p=0.01). The mean areas of VAT for the three groups were 106 cm2 (SD 72), 141 cm2 (65) and 202 cm2 (93), respectively (p=0.03). The mean body-mass index of the groups was similar, and patients in the two indinavir groups did not gain a significant amount of weight after starting the drug. Serum triglyceride values increased after starting indinavir and correlated with VAT:TAT ratios. INTERPRETATION: Our data suggest that some HIV-1-infected patients on indinavir treatment accumulate intra-abdominal fat that may cause abdominal symptoms. Recent evidence suggests that other HIV-1 protease inhibitors may be associated with changes in body-fat distribution. Larger studies of protease-inhibitor treatment are needed to investigate this association further and to investigate metabolic or endocrine mechanisms that may underlie this phenomenon.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1999

Interaction of sildenafil and indinavir when co-administered to HIV-positive patients.

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of erectile dysfunction in HIV-infected men is estimated to be 33%. Sildenafil citrate (Viagra; Pfizer Ltd, Sandwich, Kent, UK) is the first oral drug for this condition. Since sildenafil and the protease inhibitors are both metabolized by, and act as inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics of the combination sildenafil plus indinavir in HIV-infected patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: Six patients at steady state in treatment with indinavir participated in the study. On the first day blood samples for indinavir assay were drawn at times 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 h after dosing. On the second study day patients received a single dose of 25 mg of sildenafil in addition to their routine morning medication. Blood samples were taken as described. Separated plasma was stored at -80 degrees C until analysis by high performance liquid chromatography. In a parallel study, the effect of indinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir and nelfinavir on the in vitro hepatic metabolism of sildenafil was assessed. RESULTS: The geometric mean area under the concentration curve for 0-8 h (AUC0-8h) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for indinavir were 19.69 microg/ml h (range, 9.19-31.99 microg/ml h) and 7.02 microg/ml (range, 2.33-16.17 microg/ml), respectively, on the first study day. In the presence of sildenafil, the mean AUC0-8h and Cmax of indinavir were 22.37 microg/ml h [range, 10.08-37.25 microg/ml h; 95% confidence interval (CI) for difference between means, -15 to 13.25) and 9.11 microg/ml (range, 3.41-22.78 microg/ml; 95% CI, -13 to 6.37), respectively. The geometric mean AUC0-8h and Cmax for sildenafil were 1631 ng/ml h (range, 643-2970 ng/ml h) and 384 ng/ml (range, 209-766 ng/ml) respectively. The AUC for sildenafil was 4.4 times higher than data from historical controls given either 50 mg or 100 mg of sildenafil and dose normalized to 25 mg. Indinavir was a potent inhibitor of sildenafil hepatic metabolism in vitro [concentration producing 50% inhibition of control enzyme activity (IC50) = 0.39 +/- 0.17 microM, mean +/- SD]. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of sildenafil 25 mg did not significantly alter the plasma indinavir levels. However, plasma sildenafil AUC was markedly increased in the presence of indinavir compared with historical controls. From the in vitro data, the mechanism of increase is indinavir inhibition of the hepatic metabolism of sildenafil. The magnitude of this interaction suggests a lower starting dose of sildenafil may be more appropriate in this clinical setting.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Indinavir pharmacokinetics and parmacodynamics in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

The indinavir dosage regimen currently used for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children is not based on pharmacokinetic data obtained in the target patient population. The purpose of our study was to characterize indinavir pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in HIV-infected children. Eleven children (age range, 9.0 to 13.6 years; weight range, 21.7 to 56.0 kg) receiving indinavir (500 mg/m(2) every 8 h) in combination with lamivudine and stavudine were studied. The correlation of indinavir pharmacokinetic parameters and demographic parameters was evaluated. Also, the pharmacodynamic relationship between parameters of indinavir exposure and parameters of renal toxicity and immunologic recovery was studied. The area under the indinavir concentration-time curve (AUC) and patient body surface area (BSA) showed a significant negative correlation (r = 0.73; P = 0.012). Patients with smaller BSA had excessive indinavir AUC compared to adults. On the other hand, the median minimum drug concentration in plasma (C(min)) was lower than that reported for adults. The maximum indinavir concentration in serum was higher in patients with renal toxicity (5 out of 11 children), but the difference was not statistically significant (15.3 +/- 8.2 versus 9.8 +/- 4.4 mg/liter; P = 0.19). There was a trend toward higher immunologic efficacy in patients with greater indinavir exposure: the time-averaged AUC of the percentage of CD4(+) lymphocytes over the baseline value for patients with indinavir C(min) > 95% inhibitory concentration (IC(95)) was higher than in patients with C(min) < IC(95) (P = 0. 068). Our study suggests that a dose reduction may be appropriate for children with small BSA and that a 6-h dosage regimen may be indicated for a substantial percentage of patients. Due to the low number of patients enrolled in this study, our results should be confirmed by a larger study.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Carbamazepine--indinavir interaction causes antiretroviral therapy failure.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of antiretroviral therapy failure caused by an interaction between carbamazepine and indinavir. CASE SUMMARY: A 48-year-old HIV-positive white man was treated with antiretroviral triple therapy, consisting of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine. His HIV-RNA (viral load) became undetectable (<400 copies/mL) less than two months after this therapy was started; this was confirmed one month later. Shortly after the start of antiretroviral therapy, the patient developed herpes zoster, which was treated with famciclovir. Tramadol was initially prescribed for postherpetic neuralgia; however, this was substituted with carbamazepine due to insufficient analgesic effect. Indinavir plasma concentrations decreased substantially during carbamazepine therapy. Carbamazepine was stopped after 2.5 months and, two weeks later, the HIV-RNA was detectable (6 x 103 copies/mL). Resistance for lamivudine was observed in that blood sample; resistance for zidovudine might have been present, and resistance to indinavir was not detected. A few months later, a further increase of the HIV-RNA occurred (300 x 103 copies/mL), after which the therapy was switched to a new antiretroviral regimen containing nevirapine, didanosine, and stavudine. DISCUSSION: Physicians may prescribe carbamazepine for HIV-infected patients to treat seizures or postherpetic neuralgia, which are complications of opportunistic infections such as herpes zoster or toxoplasmosis. Carbamazepine is a potent enzyme inducer, predominantly of the CYP3A enzyme system, while HIV-protease inhibitors such as indinavir are substrates for and inhibitors of CYP3A. Therefore, an interaction between these drugs could be expected. A low dose of carbamazepine (200 mg/d) and the usual dose of indinavir (800 mg q8h) in our patient resulted in carbamazepine concentrations within the therapeutic range for epilepsy treatment; indinavir concentrations dropped substantially. The virologic, resistance, and plasma drug concentration data, as well as the chronology of events, are highly indicative of antiretroviral treatment failure due to the interaction between carbamazepine and indinavir. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of carbamazepine and indinavir may cause failure of antiretroviral therapy due to insufficient indinavir plasma concentrations. Drugs other than carbamazepine should be considered to prevent this interaction. Amitriptyline or gabapentin are alternatives for postherpetic neuralgia; valproic acid or lamotrigine are alternatives for seizures. When alternate drug therapy is not possible, dosage adjustments, therapeutic drug monitoring, and careful clinical observation may help reduce adverse clinical consequences.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1999

Indinavir concentrations and antiviral effect.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the variability of indinavir pharmacokinetics in patients attending an outpatient clinic, and to explore relationships between indinavir exposure and antiviral effect. DESIGN: Open, formal pharmacokinetic evaluation. SETTING: University-affiliated clinical research center. PATIENTS: Forty-three adults infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) receiving therapy with indinavir and concomitant nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. INTERVENTION: Indinavir concentrations were measured after patients were observed taking an 800-mg oral dose, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using a one-compartment oral absorption model. Virologic and pharmacologic characteristics were compared in a subset of 23 patients who were protease inhibitor naive before receiving indinavir. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean indinavir pharmacokinetics were similar to those reported previously. Significant intersubject variability in systemic exposure was observed in patients receiving the same dosage; the 8-hour area under the curve (AUC8) ranged from 5.4-68.0 microM x hour. In protease inhibitor-naive subjects, the indinavir AUC8 was statistically higher in those with undetectable plasma HIV RNA (30.7 microM x hr) versus detectable plasma HIV RNA (22.4 microM x hr, p=0.035). Measured concentrations 5 hours after the dose and extrapolated 8-hour concentrations were also significantly higher in patients with undetectable plasma HIV RNA (both p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Indinavir plasma concentrations were highly variable among patients receiving the same dosage. Patients with an undetectable plasma HIV RNA level who were protease inhibitor naive had statistically higher indinavir concentrations and slower oral clearance than the group with detectable HIV RNA. Relationships between indinavir concentrations and anti-HIV effect provide a basis for quantifying the pharmacologic contribution to the heterogeneity in therapeutic response.

Adult↗