Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Incentives--cost”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Randomized trial of 5 dollars versus 10 dollars monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires.

BACKGROUND: The validity of the results of mailed surveys is often threatened by nonresponse bias, which is made more likely when response rates are low. However, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of several strategies to increase response rates are uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To assess three strategies to increase response rates to mailed physician surveys: including a 10 dollars versus a 5 dollars cash incentive in the initial mailing, including a mint candy or not, and using a large versus small outgoing envelope. RESEARCH DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Using a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design, a randomized trial of these strategies was conducted in a survey of 1200 physicians randomly selected from the American Medical Association's Master File. RESULTS: Including a 10 dollars incentive yielded a significantly higher response rate (60.5% vs. 52.8%) (P = 0.009). The mailing and incentive costs per completed response were 12.24 dollars (95% CI, 11.75 dollars, 13.64 dollars) in the 5 dollars group and 18.48 dollars (95% CI, 17.77 dollars, 20.69 dollars) in the 10 dollars group. Each additional response obtained in the 10 dollars group came at an incremental cost of 61.26 dollars (95% CI, 36.98 dollars, 200.80 dollars). Neither inclusion of a mint nor use of a large envelope influenced the response rate. CONCLUSIONS: Investigators may increase response rates by including more money in the initial questionnaire packet, but there may be diminishing returns to serial increments in incentives greater than 5 dollars. Including smaller incentives in more questionnaires may maximize total responses.

Candy↗

Understanding different models of health maintenance organizations.

More than 50 million Americans belong to a health maintenance organization (HMO), and enrollment in all types of managed care plans continues to grow. To survive and thrive in the evolving health care system, independent and group practitioners find it essential to understand managed care. This article describes the key features and main characteristics of the most prevalent models of HMOs, as well as the role of physicians in each. It discusses the theoretical and practical benefits and drawbacks of HMOs, including financial and organizational relationships with physicians and other providers, variation in consumer choice, provider incentives, cost effectiveness, and management oversight.

Fees and Charges↗

Reimbursement comes of age. EMPOWER: a management information system.

A management information (MI) system for general and academic medical practices is imperative in a changing environment. Funded by a grant from the MGMA Academic Practice Assembly, EMPOWER is relevant to all types of medical practice. The software package supports financial/time allocation models, income/expense models and incentive cost center approaches.

Academic Medical Centers↗