Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Image-guided diagnosis”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Optimizing prostate biopsy decision making - (MUSIC-screen): A 1:1 randomized controlled trial comparing micro-ultrasound versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Micro-ultrasound (microUS) represents a potential alternative to multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMRI) in guiding prostate biopsy, with level 1 evidence demonstrating non-inferiority to detect Grade Group &#x2265;2 (GG&#xa0;&#x2265;&#xa0;2) prostate cancer in biopsy-na&#xef;ve men. However, a critical gap remains in the screening pathway, in which imaging is needed to identify men at risk and determine whether biopsy is warranted. METHODS: MUSIC-Screen is a phase 3, open-label, noninferiority 1:1 randomized controlled trial evaluating microUS as an alternative imaging compared to mpMRI for determining the need for prostate biopsy in biopsy- and imaging- na&#xef;ve men at risk for GG&#xa0;&#x2265;&#xa0;2. A total of 1284 men will be randomized to undergo either microUS or mpMRI. Men with PRI-MUS 3-5 or PI-RADS 3-5 lesion will undergo targeted and systematic biopsy. Men with negative imaging and PSA density&#xa0;&#x2265;&#xa0;0.15 will undergo systematic biopsy, while those with PSA density&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.15 will defer biopsy. RESULTS: The primary outcome is GG&#xa0;&#x2265;&#xa0;2 detection in each study arm. The primary hypothesis is that microUS is non-inferior to mpMRI for screening and detection of GG&#xa0;&#x2265;&#xa0;2. Secondary objectives include comparison of GG&#xa0;&#x2265;&#xa0;2 detection rates in targeted cores among patients with PRI-MUS or PI-RADS scores of 3-5, proportion of men who defer biopsy but are diagnosed with GG&#xa0;&#x2265;&#xa0;2 within 8&#xa0;years, assessment of the negative predictive value of each imaging modality, and health economic analyses. CONCLUSION: MUSIC-Screen will determine whether microUS can be used as an imaging modality to inform biopsy decision making that is non-inferior to mpMRI for GG&#xa0;&#x2265;&#xa0;2 prostate cancer detection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06626022.

Humans

Image-guided biopsy of breast lesions-when to use what biopsy technique.

In recent years, minimally invasive diagnostic options for breast lesions have expanded, but consensus on optimal biopsy techniques and imaging combinations remains lacking. This study, driven by an adapted RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method and insights from eight experts in breast biopsy from across the world, aims to create consensus for selecting biopsy techniques. Highlighted findings suggest Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (VAB) for lesions visible exclusively at mammography/tomosynthesis (with or without contrast enhancement) or MRI. Core-needle biopsy (CNB) takes precedence for masses over 5&#x2009;mm visible under US. The selection of other biopsy techniques during US-guided procedures depends on lesion type, size, and sampling indication. VAB is preferred for smaller masses (<&#x2009;5&#x2009;mm), complex cystic and solid lesions with small solid parts, small intraductal masses, architectural distortions, and calcifications visible on US. In re-biopsy scenarios for inconclusive findings or high-risk lesions, the panel suggests two VAB extensions: Extended Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (EVAB) for unambiguous lesion classification and Vacuum-Assisted Excision (VAE) for complete lesion removal. Furthermore, the panel provides detailed input on how to handle specific cases, such as re-biopsy for lobular neoplasia, flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. Surgical excision is advised for DCIS and benign or borderline phyllodes tumors found through initial CNB or VAB. In conclusion, an international expert group formulated recommendations on diagnostic breast biopsies under image guidance, aiming to ensure accurate diagnosis worldwide by providing practical advice on needle selection and biopsy approach. KEY POINTS: Evidence-based literature on the preferred biopsy technique and imaging combination for the diagnosis of breast lesions is sparse, and a general consensus is not available. The selection of biopsy technique for different image-guided procedures depends on lesion type, size, and sampling indication. This international expert panel consensus statement addresses standard approaches for varying biopsy indications.

Breast cancer

PCa Detection in PI-RADS 4 and 5 Lesions: Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-Guided Robot-Assisted Biopsy Versus mpMRI Cognitive-Fusion TRUS-Guided Prostate Biopsy.

Lesions with a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of 4 or greater on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) indicate a high likelihood of prostate cancer (PCa), and guidelines recommend a targeted biopsy. We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of robotic arm-assisted [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-guided prostate biopsy (PGPB) with mpMRI-directed cognitive-fusion transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (MCFB) in biopsy-na&#xef;ve men with clinical findings suggestive of PCa. Methods: This prospective, single-center, randomized clinical trial (NCT05137561) enrolled biopsy-na&#xef;ve men age 50-90 y with elevated levels of prostate-specific antigen (&#x2265;4 ng/mL) and abnormal digital rectal examination findings. All participants underwent mpMRI, and those with a PI-RADS score of 4 or greater were randomized into 2 arms. In arm 1, participants underwent PGPB for a [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-avid lesion, and participants in arm 2 underwent MCFB. Participants in arm 1 with PET-negative findings subsequently underwent MCFB, and participants with negative biopsy results underwent PET and PGPB. The primary outcome was the detection of PCa. Secondary outcomes included complication rates and participant-reported pain. Result: Of the 267 participants enrolled, 81.3% (217) had lesions with a PI-RADS score of 4 or greater and were randomized to either PGPB (n = 112) or MCFB (n = 105). PCa was detected in 97.1% of participants (101/104) in arm 1 and 81.0% (85/105) in arm 2 (P < 0.05). PGPB showed higher diagnostic accuracy for PI-RADS 5 lesions (100% vs. 95.1%, P = 0.09). Major complications were observed in arm 2 only (n = 5). Arm 1 had significantly fewer complications (10.8% vs. 51.4%, P < 0.01), a lower median visual analog scale score for pain (3 vs. 5), and shorter procedure times. The core positivity rate was higher in arm 1 (60% &#xb1; 20%), despite obtaining fewer cores. Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PGPB demonstrated higher diagnostic performance, fewer complications, and better tolerability compared with MCFB. This approach enables integrated diagnosis and staging, offering a promising alternative for efficient, safe, and accurate evaluation of prostate cancer.

Humans

Computed tomography-guided precision biopsy combined with metagenomic next-generation sequencing for etiological diagnosis in patients with blood culture-negative systemic infections.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy combined with metagenomic next-generation sequencing in patients with blood culture-negative systemic infections and to assess the clinical impact of using this combined strategy for etiological confirmation and guidance of targeted antimicrobial therapy.MethodsThis single-center retrospective observational cohort study enrolled 78 patients who met the Sepsis-3 consensus criteria for suspected systemic infection and had negative conventional microbiological work-ups (at least two sets of blood cultures) between April 2022 and March 2025. All patients underwent computed tomography-guided biopsy of radiologically identified infectious foci, with specimens processed concurrently for conventional culture and metagenomic next-generation sequencing. Diagnostic performance was benchmarked against the final comprehensive clinical diagnosis, and the influence of metagenomic next-generation sequencing findings on antimicrobial therapy modification was analyzed. Sample size calculation, based on a prior study estimating an metagenomic next-generation sequencing detection rate of 85% (&#x3b1;&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.05, &#x3b2;&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.2), indicated a minimum of 68 cases; accordingly, 78 patients were enrolled.ResultsComputed tomography-guided biopsy was technically successful in all 78 patients (100%). The pathogen detection rate of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (91.0%, 71/78) was significantly higher than that of conventional culture (55.1%, 43/78; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). Using the final clinical diagnosis as the reference standard, metagenomic next-generation sequencing achieved a sensitivity of 94.7% (95% confidence interval: 86.9-98.5), specificity of 100.0% (95% confidence interval: 29.2-100.0), positive predictive value of 100.0% (95% confidence interval: 94.9-100.0), and negative predictive value of 42.9% (95% confidence interval: 9.9-81.6). Among the 35 culture-negative specimens, metagenomic next-generation sequencing established a definitive microbiological diagnosis in 28 cases (80.0%) and detected polymicrobial infections in 11 cases (14.1% of the cohort). Antimicrobial therapy was rationally adjusted based on metagenomic next-generation sequencing results in 69.2% (54/78) of the patients.ConclusionsThe integration of computed tomography-guided precision biopsy with metagenomic next-generation sequencing offers a highly effective diagnostic approach for blood culture-negative systemic infections. This synergistic strategy improves etiological diagnosis by providing high-yield target specimens that enable comprehensive, unbiased pathogen screening, facilitates differentiation between infectious and non-infectious etiologies, and supplies critical evidence for guiding precision antimicrobial therapy. These findings highlight the growing role of interventional radiology in the contemporary framework of precision infectious disease management.

Humans