Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Ibandronic Acid”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Ibandronic acid: a review of its use in the treatment of bone metastases of breast cancer.

Ibandronic acid (Bondronat) is a potent, new-generation, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, available in both intravenous and oral formulations, which effectively inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. In clinical trials, the two formulations were equally effective in preventing skeletal-related events and improving quality of life in patients with bone metastases of breast cancer. Both intravenous and oral ibandronic acid reduced metastatic bone pain scores below baseline levels for up to 2 years. Oral ibandronic acid is administered as a single 50 mg tablet taken once daily. It suppressed bone resorption in breast cancer patients with bone metastases to an extent similar to that observed with intravenous zoledronic acid. Both intravenous and oral ibandronic acid were well tolerated with no evidence of renal toxicity. Ibandronic acid is therefore a valuable addition to the bisphosphonates used in the treatment of bone metastases of breast cancer, offering high potency and the convenience of oral administration, combined with the absence of renal toxicity.

Bone Density Conservation Agents↗
PubMed2006

Long-term safety of intravenous ibandronic acid for up to 4 years in metastatic breast cancer: an open-label trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Despite their widespread use in metastatic bone disease, some bisphosphonate drugs are associated with adverse events (AEs), particularly renal toxicity, adding to treatment burdens and increasing healthcare costs. Ibandronic acid is a single-nitrogen bisphosphonate with high efficacy against bone events and metastatic bone pain, and a renal safety profile compar- able to that of placebo. In this study, the safety of ibandronic acid was examined over a period of 4 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During an initial 96-week period, breast cancer patients with bone metastases were randomised in double-blind fashion to placebo or ibandronic acid 6mg administered by intravenous infusion over 1-2 hours every 3-4 weeks as part of a previously reported phase III trial (MF 4265 study). All patients completing the phase III trial were offered open-label active treatment for a further 96 weeks (extension phase). A total of 62 patients received ibandronic acid 6mg in this extension phase and were classified according to their initial treatment (placebo/ibandronic acid 6mg [placebo/6mg] and ibandronic acid 6mg/ibandronic acid 6mg [6mg/6mg] groups). Safety was assessed by AE reports and clinical laboratory evaluations. RESULTS: During the 4-year study, most patients experienced at least one AE, with malignancy progression being most commonly reported. However, fewer treatment-related AEs were reported in the extension phase (placebo/6mg: 6.3% [1/16]; 6mg/6mg: 13.0% [6/46]) than in the initial phase of the study (placebo: 56.3% [9/16]; 6mg: 67.4% [31/46]). Serious AEs were mainly due to malignancy progression. There were no clinically relevant renal AEs, and in both groups, serum creatinine levels were similar for up to 4 years. CONCLUSION: This 96-week open-label safety extension of a phase III, placebo-controlled trial demonstrates that long-term use of intravenous ibandronic acid is well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Oral ibandronic acid.

Roche Holdings AG is developing an oral formulation of the bisphosphonate derivative ibandronic acid as a potential treatment for metastatic bone disease in breast cancer patients; it was filed for this indication in October 2002. Roche and its Japanese subsidiary Chugai Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, in collaboration with GlaxoSmithKline plc, have also developed the formulation for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Bisphosphonates inhibit angiogenesis in vitro and testosterone-stimulated vascular regrowth in the ventral prostate in castrated rats.

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are used currently in the treatment of patients with bone metastases because these compounds inhibit bone resorption. We examined here the effects of BPs on inhibition of endothelial cell functions in vitro and in vivo. Treatment of endothelial cells with BPs (clodronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and zoledronic acid) reduced proliferation, induced apoptosis, and decreased capillary-like tube formation in vitro. Quantification of blood vessels in bone biopsy specimens from patients with Paget's disease before and after clodronate treatment showed a 40% reduction of the vascularization after BP treatment. However, such a decreased vascularity could be secondary to a reduction of bone resorption. Therefore, the tissue distribution of [14C]BPs in male rats was examined to develop an angiogenesis model in a noncalcified tissue where BPs could accumulate. [14C]BPs (zoledronic acid, ibandronate, and clodronate) not only accumulated in bone but also transiently accumulated in the prostate. The effects of BPs on testosterone-induced revascularization of the prostate gland in castrated rats were then studied. Testosterone in combination with ibandronate or zoledronic acid induced a 17-35% reduction of the prostate weight compared with castrated rats treated with testosterone alone. Blood vessel immunostaining on prostate tissue sections revealed that both ibandronate and zoledronic acid induced a 50% reduction of the revascularization of the prostate gland. Moreover, zoledronic acid did not alter testosterone-induced activity of a luciferase gene reporter construct transfected in androgen-dependent prostatic cells, indicating that this BP did not directly interfere with testosterone. In conclusion, BPs have in vivo antiangiogenic properties, which could be of relevance to improve therapy and prevention of bone metastasis. In addition, our results extend the potential clinical use of BPs to patients with early prostate cancer.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors↗
PubMed2004

Breast tumour growth inhibition in vitro through the combination of cyclophosphamide/metotrexate/5-fluorouracil, epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, epirubicin/paclitaxel, and epirubicin/docetaxel with the bisphosphonates ibandronate and zoledronic acid.

Breast cancer has a significant capacity to metastasize to bone. Bisphosphonates are the standard treatment for hypocalcaemia of malignancy (HCM), which is a common complication of bone metastasis. The combination of bisphosphonates with standard anticancer drugs such as paclitaxel or tamoxifen results in a synergistic apoptotic effect greater than that produced by either single agent alone. Potential antitumour effects in vitro of the two bisphosphonates zoledronic acid (Zol) and ibandronate (Ib) (each at 30 microM) combined with different anticancer drug combinations: cyclophosphamide/metotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF), epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC), epirubicin/paclitaxel (ET), and epirubicin/docetaxel (EDoc) were investigated using ATP-cell viability assay (ATP-CVA). Twenty cases of female primary, invasive breast cancer were assessed. Ibandronate and zoledronic acid alone showed an inhibitory effect on breast cancer tumour cells in vitro. The breast tumour growth inhibition effect for those two drugs amounted to 22 and 25% respectively. Inhibitory effects were clearly visible for all four combinations of anticancer drugs together with both bisphosphonates. Combinations of anticancer drugs with zoledronic acid seem to be more effective with respect to tumour growth inhibition than combinations with ibandronate.

Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous↗
PubMed2006

Intravenous ibandronate: in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Ibandronate (ibandronic acid) is a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate that inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Recently, an intravenous (IV) formulation of ibandronate for intermittent injection, which circumvents the fasting and posture requirements associated with administration of oral bisphosphonates, was approved for use in this patient population. In initial placebo-controlled studies of 1 year's duration, IV ibandronate (< or =2mg once every 3 months) increased lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) and reduced levels of biochemical markers of bone turnover in a dose-dependent manner. Dosages < or =1mg every 3 months were found to be suboptimal in terms of fracture prevention in a 3-year trial. Subsequently, the large randomised, double-blind, noninferiority DIVA trial showed that, in terms of increasing lumbar spine BMD (primary endpoint), IV ibandronate 3mg once every 3 months and 2mg once every 2 months for 1 year were noninferior and also superior to oral ibandronate 2.5mg once daily, a regimen with proven antifracture efficacy. Median reductions from baseline in biochemical markers of bone turnover were similar for the IV and oral regimens. IV ibandronate was generally well tolerated in clinical trials. Treatment-related adverse events included musculoskeletal events and transient influenza-like symptoms, the latter mainly associated with the first dose.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Ibandronate.

Ibandronate (ibandronic acid) is a third generation bisphosphonate which inhibits hone resorption in human and animal studies. It also inhibits bone formation only at high doses (10 microg/kg/day) in animal studies. In animal models, ibandronate was more potent than etidronate, clodronate, pamidronate and alendronate and equivalent in potency or more potent than risedronate in inhibiting induced hypercalcaemia and bone resorption. In clinical studies, single-dose ibandronate (0.2 to 6 mg intravenously) significantly reduced albumin-corrected serum calcium levels and urinary markers of bone resorption in patients with hypercalcaemia of malignancy, and in those with bone metastases. Serum calcium levels were normalised in 50 and 67% of ibandronate 2 mg recipients and in about 76% of 4 mg recipients. In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia. ibandronate (0.5 to 5 mg/day orally or 0.5 to 2 mg every 3 months intravenously) dose-dependently increased bone mineral density, with parallel reductions in the biochemical markers of bone turnover. In preliminary studies in patients with Paget's disease a single intravenous ibandronate dose (2mg) decreased serum alkaline phosphatase levels and urinary markers of bone turnover. Adverse events associated with the use of ibandronate in the management of hypercalcaemia of malignancy include increased body temperature, hypocalcaemia and hypophosphataemia. Less commonly, flu-like symptoms and gastrointestinal intolerance may occur.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Once-monthly ibandronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis: review of a new dosing regimen.

BACKGROUND: Ibandronate, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in May 2003 as a daily oral regimen for the treatment and prevention of post-menopausal osteoporosis. In March 2005, the FDA approved once-monthly dosing with ibandronate for the same indications. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article was to review the efficacy and tolerability of ibandronate 150 mg once monthly in the treatment and prevention of post-menopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE (1966-September 2005) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1971-September 2005) for articles relating to the efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly ibandronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis was conducted using the terms ibandronate and ibandronic acid. Additional searches were conducted to identify publications relevant to compliance and pharmacoeconomic considerations using the terms bispbospbonate, compliance, cost, and pharmacoeconomics. The reference lists of identified articles and presentations from recent scientific meetings also were reviewed. Selected safety information from the manufacturer was incorporated. RESULTS: Ibandronate 2.5 mg/d and intermittent ibandronate (20 mg QOD for 12 doses every 3 months) have been shown to effectively reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures; after 3 years of therapy in a placebo-controlled clinical trial, the relative risk reductions for new vertebral fractures with daily and intermittent ibandronate were 62% and 50%, respectively (both, P<0.001 vs placebo). Once-monthly ibandronate has been evaluated in 2 clinical trials: a Phase I dose-ranging trial in 144 healthy postmenopausal women and a Phase III noninferiority trial in 1609 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who were randomized to receive ibandronate 2.5 mg/d or 1 of 3 monthly ibandronate regimens: 50/50 mg (50 mg given on 2 consecutive days) once monthly; 100 mg once monthly; and 150 mg once monthly. The primary end point of the Phase III trial was the change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD). After 1 year of therapy, patients who received ibandronate 150 mg once monthly had a significantly greater increase from baseline in lumbar spine BMD compared with those who received ibandronate 2.5 mg/d (4.9% vs 3.9%, respectively; P=0.002). The overall adverse-event profile was similar between the daily and monthly regimens. Drug-related adverse events were reported in 32.4% of patients receiving ibandronate 2.5 mg/d and 36.9% of patients receiving ibandronate 150 mg monthly. Upper gastrointestinal adverse events occurred in a respective 22.8% and 22.5% of the 2 groups. After 1 year of therapy, patients receiving ibandronate 150 mg monthly reported more flulike symptoms (8.3%) compared with those receiving ibandronate 2.5 mg/d (2.8%). In a crossover study comparing preference for and convenience of monthly ibandronate and weekly alendronate in 342 ambulatory women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, significantly more patients preferred the monthly ibandronate regimen to the weekly alendronate regimen (71.4% vs 28.5%, respectively; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Once-monthly ibandronate is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Association between pharmacokinetics of oral ibandronate and clinical response in bone mass and bone turnover in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Data from the 1-year, phase II trial of oral ibandronate for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis are presented (n = 180). Participants were at least 10 years past menopause and had osteopenia defined as a forearm bone mineral density at least 1.5 SD below the premenopausal mean value. Doses were 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, 2.5, or 5.0 mg daily oral ibandronate or placebo. A total of 116 women treated with ibandronate completed the study. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analyses were drawn 20 min, 40 min, 60 min, 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h after the first and last administration of the study drug. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to determine the concentration of ibandronic acid (BM 21.0955) in serum (Enzymun-Test System ES 600). The assay is based on streptavidine technology to fix the capture antibody to the wall of the tube. Standards were prepared for each participant using individual drug-free serum. The serum concentration-time curves of ibandronate, expressed as the area under the curve over the sampling period (AUC(0-6h)), revealed a highly significant dose-response relationship, p < 0.0001, and linear pharmacokinetic behavior. An initial half-life (T(1/2lambda1)) in serum representing distribution and early elimination was 1.3 hours. Steady-state AUC (AUC(0-6h ss)) increased by a factor of 2.5, which is consistent with an apparent elimination half-life of 32.6 h and a dosing interval of 24 h. There was an exponential association between AUC(0-6h) (ss) and the change from baseline at month 12 in the bone markers (n = 116): r = -0.37 (serum total osteocalcin), r = -0.65 (urine C-telopeptides of type I collagen), and r = -0.65 (serum C-telopeptides of type I collagen), all p < 0.0001. All bone markers were maximally depressed at values of AUC(0-6h ss) of about 3 ng h/mL. AUC(0-6h ss) furthermore revealed a logarithmic association with change from baseline at month 12 in spine BMD, r = 0.39, p < 0.0001. In conclusion, the serum concentration of ibandronate was determined validly by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The data are the first to show highly significant associations between pharmacokinetic parameters of a bisphosphonate and the clinical response in bone mass and bone turnover.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Long-term safety of bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis: a review of the evidence.

This article reviews the long-term safety profile of bisphosphonates for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclastic resorption and reduce the rate of bone turnover, thereby reducing fracture risk. Placebo-controlled trials of oral amino-bisphosphonates of up to 4 years' duration and continuous treatment for up to 10 years in extensions of these trials (without continuous placebo comparison groups) have reported that bone quality remains normal, and suggest that the early reductions in fracture risk may be sustained for as long as treatment continues. Studies in animals using high doses of bisphosphonates have also reported normal quality bone with increased strength. The adverse experience profile (including upper gastrointestinal tolerability) of the oral bisphosphonates alendronic acid and risedronic acid has been similar to placebo in randomised trials with thousands of participants, whereas the incidence of flu-like symptoms was increased with the high doses used in oral monthly and intravenous ibandronic acid. Thus, the existing data are reassuring for long-term continued daily (or its weekly equivalent) administration of alendronic acid and risedronic acid, with no evidence of an adverse effect on bone health. For other dosing regimens, additional data are needed to evaluate their long-term safety.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with multiple myeloma treated with bisphosphonates: evidence of increased risk after treatment with zoledronic acid.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has been associated with the use of pamidronate and zoledronic acid. ONJ was assessed prospectively since July 2003 in 202 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received bisphosphonates since April 1995. Fifteen patients (7.4%) developed ONJ. The median time of exposure to bisphosphonates was 39 months for patients with ONJ compared to 28 months (p=0.048) for patients with no ONJ. The cumulative hazard of developing ONJ was significantly higher in patients treated with zoledronic acid alone than in those treated with pamidronate alone/pamidronate+zoledronic acid/zoledronic acid+ibandronate sequentially (1% at 1 year and 15% at 4 years vs. 0% and 5%, p=0.003). In conclusion, the risk of ONJ is increased with time of exposure and probably with the use of zoledronic acid.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

BM 21.0955, a potent new bisphosphonate to inhibit bone resorption.

A total of 300 new bisphosphonates were screened for their effect on bone resorption in the rat. Among these, 1-hydroxy-3-(methylpentylamino)propylidenebisphosphonate (BM 21.0955) was selected for detailed investigation. It inhibited arotinoid-stimulated bone resorption as assessed by calcemia in thyroparathyroidectomized rats at a SC dose as low as 0.001 mg P (0.016 mumol) per kg body weight per day. The compound was thus about 2, 10, 50, and 500 times more potent than risedronate, alendronate, pamidronate, and clodronate, respectively. Intravenous administration was as effective as subcutaneous, and oral administration was 100 times less effective. The effect after one administration decreased with time but was still measurable after 2 weeks. Nonstimulated bone resorption assayed by the urinary excretion of radiolabeled tetracycline from lifelong prelabeled animals was also inhibited. This effect started 3 days after a single dose and was still maximal after 7 days. Histomorphometric analysis of the tibial metaphysis in growing intact rats also showed an inhibition of bone resorption along with an increase in bone mass. The number of osteoclasts increased in animals treated with 0.01 and 0.1 mg P per kg (0.16 and 1.6 mumol/kg) body weight SC but decreased in animals given 1 mg P per kg (16.1 mumol/kg), showing that the inhibition of bone resorption was not due to an inhibition of osteoclast recruitment. No inhibition of mineralization occurred. This new bisphosphonate appears to have great potential for use in human bone disease.

Alendronate↗
PubMed1993

Bisphosphonates act on rat bone resorption through the mediation of osteoblasts.

Bisphosphonates are generally considered to act on bone resorption by binding to bone mineral and subsequently inhibiting the activity of the osteoclasts which ingest them. This has been supported by the fact that bisphosphonates adsorbed on mineralized tissue inhibit the resorbing activity of isolated osteoclasts in vitro. However, the effectiveness of different bisphosphonates determined in this system does not reflect their relative potencies in vivo. Employing the well-described isolated osteoclast resorption pit assay, with ivory as the resorption substrate, we show here that this lack of correlation prevails only when the bisphosphonates are added to the mineral before addition of osteoclasts, but not when the cells are treated for a short time (5 min) before allowing them to adhere onto ivory. By using this approach with five different bisphosphonates, a stringent correlation of relative potencies was obtained with those found, both in the rat and in the human, in vivo. Furthermore, by using an osteoblastic cell line (CRP 10/30) which is a powerful promoter of osteoclastic resorption in vitro, we obtained evidence that the inhibitory effect of bisphosphonates was the result of an action on osteoblasts rather than on osteoclasts. Thus, in experiments in which the osteoblastic cells were pretreated for 5 min with bisphosphonates and then cocultured with osteoclasts, inhibition of osteoclastic resorbing activity was obtained. Moreover, it was found that this treatment resulted in a decrease of the stimulatory effect found in CRP 10/30-conditioned medium. In conclusion the present study shows that part of the osteoclast inhibiting action of the bisphosphonates is mediated through an action on osteoblasts.

Alendronate↗
PubMed2005

Cost-effectiveness of oral ibandronate versus IV zoledronic acid or IV pamidronate for bone metastases in patients receiving oral hormonal therapy for breast cancer in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: Oral ibandronate is a single-nitrogen bisphosphonate whose efficacy is similar to that of IV ibandronate for the treatment of bone metastases. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of oral ibandronate with zoledronic acid and generic pamidronate (both administered by IV) for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer receiving oral hormonal therapy in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A global economic model was adapted to the UK National Health Service. Patients were assumed to receive oral hormonal therapy for 50% of their projected 14.3-month survival. The primary outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Bisphosphonate efficacy data for relative risk reduction of skeletal-related events (SREs) were obtained from clinical trials. Resource use data and costs associated with IV bisphosphonate infusions were derived from published studies and a unit cost database; monthly drug acquisition costs were obtained from the British National Formulary. Utility scores were applied to time with or without an SRE to adjust survival for quality of life. Therefore, differences in QALYs were driven by utility weights rather than survival time. Model design and inputs were validated through expert UK clinician review. The absence of comparative efficacy and safety data from clinical trials for the different bisphosphonates was a model limitation that we addressed by supporting our assumptions with UK expert clinician opinion and with expert clinician opinion outside of the United Kingdom, and by conducting sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The projected total cost per patient was pound307 less with oral ibandronate compared with zoledronic acid, and pound158 less compared with the use of generic pamidronate (due to a reduction in staff time for infusions, avoidance of renal safety monitoring visits, and, in the case of IV generic pamidronate, a reduction in the number of SREs). Oral ibandronate was estimated to lead to a gain of 0.02 QALY, making it the economically dominant treatment option. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that oral ibandronate was cost-effective for the management of bone metastases from breast cancer among patients receiving oral hormonal therapy in the United Kingdom. Oral ibandronate provided effective SRE and bone-pain management while avoiding resource use and costs associated with regular IV bisphosphonate infusions. Due to uncertainty surrounding the model assumptions, it would be valuable to repeat the analyses using data from comparative bisphosphonate trials, once they become available.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Oral bisphosphonates: A review of clinical use in patients with bone metastases.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to review the efficacy and safety of oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of bone metastases in cancer patients. METHODS: Available published clinical studies of oral bisphosphonates in bone metastases from 1980 to the present were identified through a MEDLINE search and from literature references. Data were reviewed for efficacy and safety, with an emphasis on double blind, placebo-controlled studies; clinically relevant endpoints; and appropriate study methodology. RESULTS: Etidronate, alendronate, pamidronate, risedronate, and tiludronate currently are available in the U.S. as either intravenous and/or oral formulations. Although newer bisphosphonates are more potent, oral bioavailability remains < 1%. Oral etidronate has been found to be ineffective in patients with multiple myeloma and prostate carcinoma bone metastases. Pamidronate has been found to be effective in reducing skeletal morbidity associated with bone metastases in both multiple myeloma and breast carcinoma patients when given intravenously, but is ineffective orally in multiple myeloma patients. To the authors' knowledge, there are no double blind, placebo-controlled trials of oral pamidronate in patients with breast carcinoma and bone metastases. Several clinical trials with clodronate, a bisphosphonate that is not available in the U.S., have shown mixed results in patients with myeloma and breast carcinoma bone metastases. To the authors' knowledge, there are no published trials evaluating oral alendronate, tiludronate, or risedronate in patients with metastases to bone. CONCLUSIONS: Oral bisphosphonates do not appear to be as effective as intravenous administration in reducing skeletal complications in patients with metastases to bone lesions. Low oral bioavailability is the most likely reason for this difference. Oral dosing should not be substituted for intravenous administration in the treatment of malignant osteolysis.

Alendronate↗
PubMed2005

A bright future for osteoporosis treatment.

Osteoporosis is a serious and common condition with very high associated healthcare costs. However, methods for earlier detection and more effective treatment appear likely to produce significant improvement both in the immediate future and in the longer term. Introduction of biological markers of bone turnover should greatly assist in the conduct and evaluation of clinical trials. In addition, a number of very novel approaches are also under investigation that could lead to the introduction of new agents with a wide range of mechanisms of action. These developments were discussed at the Second Joint Meeting of the European Calcified Tissue Society and the International Bone and Mineral Society, held June 25-29, 2005, in Geneva, Switzerland.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗