Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “INSULIN”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of porcine insulin and human insulin (Novo) using the glucose-controlled insulin infusion system, glucose-insulin dose-response curves, and the outpatient effectiveness of human insulin (Novo) in insulin-dependent diabetes.

The usefulness of human insulin (Novo) in the treatment of diabetes was studied in eight insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Evaluation was carried out through three methods: (1) glucose-controlled insulin infusion system on two separate days during the patients' ingestion of mixed meals; (2) euglycemic clamp method; and (3) evaluation of patients for 3 mo using short- and intermediate-acting insulins. Employing the glucose-controlled insulin infusion system resulted in mean daily insulin requirements of 84 +/- 9 U and 85 +/- 6 U SEM for porcine and human insulin, respectively (P = NS). Plasma glucose levels attained during the euglycemic clamp were 96 +/- 3 mg/dl. At each insulin infusion rate, the steady-state glucose infusion rates for porcine insulin were 1.12 +/- 0.22, 1.90 +/- 0.58, 4.28 +/- 0.61, and 9.37 +/- 0.66 mg/kg/min compared with 1.27 +/- 0.42, 2.38 +/- 0.20, 4.25 +/- 0.43, and 8.87 +/- 0.67 mg/kg/min for human insulin. No complications of either insulin preparation were observed in the 3-mo patient evaluation. Human insulin was associated with lower levels of circulating insulin antibody (P less than 0.03). In addition, hemoglobin A1c levels decreased from 8.4 to 6.9% (P less than 0.035), and normal hemoglobin A1c levels were maintained in patients using portable insulin infusion pumps.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Affinity of IgG-insulin antibodies to human (recombinant DNA) insulin and porcine insulin in insulin-treated diabetic individuals with and without insulin resistance.

The affinity of human (recombinant DNA) insulin and porcine insulin to preformed IgG-insulin antibodies of insulin-treated diabetic individuals was studied in 29 insulin-treated diabetic patients. The binding of 125I-human insulin and 125I-porcine insulin with antibodies was similar in the group of patients without insulin resistance (N = 25). The sera of insulin-resistant diabetic patients (N = 4), containing very high IgG-insulin immunoglobulins, showed a significantly lower affinity for human insulin compared with porcine insulin (P less than 0.01). All four patients with insulin-antibody-mediated insulin resistance were positive for HLA-DR4, but negative for -DR3, supporting the concept of an immunogenetically transferred anti-insulin immune response in insulin-treated diabetic individuals. Based on the reduced binding of human insulin to IgG-antibodies of very high titers in patients with insulin resistance, a potential therapeutic advantage of human insulin therapy can be expected in such infrequent cases of immunologic insulin resistance.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Efficacy of insulin lispro in combination with NPH human insulin twice per day in patients with insulin-dependent or non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Multicenter Insulin Lispro Study Group.

A common treatment regimen for patients with either insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) or non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is a combination of rapid-acting insulin and intermediate-acting insulin administered twice each day. It is usually recommended that regular human insulin be injected 30 to 45 minutes before a meal. In practice, patients often inject regular human insulin closer to mealtime, causing a higher post-prandial serum glucose level and an increased potential for hypoglycemia in the postabsorptive period. Insulin lispro, a rapid-acting insulin analogue, is best injected just before a meal because of its more rapid absorption and shorter duration of action. In 707 randomized patients, 379 with IDDM and 328 with NIDDM, we studied the effect of twice-daily insulin lispro or regular human insulin in combination with NPH human insulin (isophane insulin) on premeal, 2-hour postprandial, and bedtime glycemic control. Assessments were based on the results of a seven-point blood glucose profile, the insulin dose (by formulation and time of administration), the incidence and frequency of hypoglycemic episodes, and the glycated hemoglobin value. Treatment with insulin lispro resulted in lower postprandial glucose levels and smaller increases in glucose level after the morning and evening meals compared with treatment with regular human insulin. Overall glycemic control, frequency of hypoglycemic events, and total insulin dose were not different between the two groups. Insulin lispro in combination with NPH human insulin in a twice-per-day regimen allows injection closer to mealtime and improves post-prandial glycemic control without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Serum insulin, insulin antibodies and insulin requirement in the first period of insulin treatment in non-insulin resistant diabetics.

Twelve insulin-sensitive diabetics were studied for 200 days after the initiation of mixed beef-pork NPH insulin. Normalization of the fasting blood glucose was not accompanied by any elevation in the pre-treatment fasting immunoreactive insulin level. Insulin antibodies appeared in 2 patients on the second week of insulin treatment, in 6 others within 87 days. In 4 patients no antibodies were found 200 days after the start of insulin. The appearance of antibodies was accompanied in two patients by a decrease in insulin requirement, in others there was no change. When antibodies were present, the total maximum insulin binding capacity was 4 to 12 U/l, but the total insulin constituted only 3 to 36% of the binding capacity. Insulin wastage caused by the destruction of the immune complexes was calculated to be 0.35 to 5.6 U/die only, and this explains the negligible effect of insulin antibodies on insulin requirement in non-resistant patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

[Glucose tolerance and insulin resistance in the elderly].

Glucose tolerance is reported to be impaired in the elderly, and this is said to be mainly due to a decrease in insulin sensitivity (insulin resistance). Insulin resistance is known to be associated with atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease. To clarify whether or not age-dependent changes in glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity are risk factors for coronary artery disease, as they are in the case of the insulin resistance syndrome, we studied age-dependent changes in glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, and serum lipids in a large number of subjects who underwent annual health check-ups, and then studied the relationships between coronary artery disease and aging, insulin sensitivity, and other risk factors in subjects who underwent coronary angiography. Aging was associated with an increased prevalence of noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance; even in subjects with normal glucose tolerance, plasma glucose levels during an oral glucose tolerance test were significantly higher in the elderly. Insulin sensitivity, as assessed by the ratio of the sum of the plasma glucose divided by the sum of the serum insulin during the test (sigma PG/sigma IRI), was significantly lower in subjects over 60 years old than in younger subjects. Age-dependent impairment of insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance was associated with increased blood pressure and serum cholesterol levels, but not with changes in boy mass index or serum triglyceride levels. As an independent variable, aging, but not insulin sensitivity, was related to the severity of coronary artery disease. These data suggest that aging is associated with glucose intolerance, insulin resistance, and an increased risk of coronary artery disease, but that the effect of aging on coronary artery disease cannot be explained by insulin resistance alone. Other factors, such as glucose intolerance and increased blood pressure, in addition to insulin resistance, appear to be responsible of the increased risk for coronary artery disease in the elderly.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Basal insulin glargine (HOE 901) versus NPH insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily insulin regimens. U.S. Insulin Glargine (HOE 901) Type 1 Diabetes Investigator Group.

OBJECTIVE: Insulin glargine (HOE 901, 21(A)-Gly-30(B)a-L-Arg-30(B)b-L-Arg human insulin) is a novel recombinant analog of human insulin with a shift in the isoelectric point producing a retarded absorption rate and an increased duration of action that closely mimics normal basal insulin secretion. It recently received approval from the Food and Drug Administration. The aim of this study was to evaluate 2 formulations of insulin glargine for safety and efficacy in the treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a 4-week trial, 256 patients with type 1 diabetes received either NPH insulin or insulin glargine containing 30 microg/ml zinc (insulin glargine[30]) or 80 microg/ml zinc (insulin glargine[80]). Insulin glargine was given subcutaneously once daily at bedtime. NPH insulin was given either once daily (at bedtime) or twice daily (before breakfast and at bedtime), according to the patient's prestudy regimen. The initial doses of insulin glargine and NPH were based on the previous NPH total daily dose. RESULTS: At study end point, insulin glargine-pooled groups had significantly lower fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels than the NPH insulin group, with adjusted mean FPG levels reduced by 2.2 mmol/l (P = 0.0001). Insulin glargine was superior to NPH insulin in reducing FPG levels in patients who had previously received NPH insulin twice daily but not in patients who had previously received NPH once daily. FPG levels were more stable in patients using insulin glargine than in patients using NPH insulin. A subset of patients (n = 71) underwent hourly overnight plasma glucose measurements. Insulin glargine patients exhibited lower FPG levels after 5:00 A.M.; the difference was significant by 8:00 A.M. The adjusted mean FPG for insulin glargine[30] was 7.8 mmol/l; for insulin glargine[80], 7.3 mmol/l; and for NPH, 10.7 mmol/l. Both formulations of insulin glargine were well tolerated, similar to NPH insulin. CONCLUSIONS: Basal insulin glargine administered once daily for 4 weeks as part of a basal-bolus multiple daily insulin regimen was safe and more effective in lowering fasting plasma glucose levels than NPH in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A 16-week comparison of the novel insulin analog insulin glargine (HOE 901) and NPH human insulin used with insulin lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of the long-acting insulin analog, insulin glargine, as a component of basal bolus therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with type 1 diabetes receiving basal-bolus insulin treatment with NPH human insulin and insulin lispro were randomized to receive insulin glargine (HOE 901), a long-acting basal insulin analog, once a day (n = 310) or NPH human insulin (n = 309) as basal treatment with continued bolus insulin lispro for 16 weeks in an open-label study NPH insulin patients maintained their prior schedule of administration once or twice a day, whereas insulin glargine patients received basal insulin once a day at bedtime. RESULTS: Compared with all NPH insulin patients, insulin glargine patients had significant decreases in fasting blood glucose measured at home (means +/- SEM, -42.0 +/- 4.7 vs. -12.4 +/- 4.7 mg/dl [-2.33 +/- 0.26 vs. -0.69 +/- 0.26 mmol/l]; P = 0.0001). These differences were evident early and persisted throughout the study More patients in the insulin glargine group (29.6%) than in the NPH group (16.8%) reached a target fasting blood glucose of 119 mg/dl (< 6.6 mmol/l). However, there were no differences between the groups with respect to change in GHb. Insulin glargine treatment was also associated with a significant decrease in the variability of fasting blood glucose values (P = 0.0124). No differences in the occurrence of symptomatic hypoglycemia, including nocturnal hypoglycemia, were observed. Overall, adverse events were similar in the two treatment groups with the exception of injection site pain, which was more common in the insulin glargine group (6.1%) than in the NPH group (0.3%). Weight gain was 0.12 kg in insulin glargine patients and 0.54 kg in NPH insulin patients (P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Basal insulin therapy with insulin glargine once a day appears to be as safe and at least as effective as using NPH insulin once or twice a day in maintaining glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes receiving basal-bolus insulin treatment with insulin lispro.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

'Human' insulin versus animal insulin in people with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Human insulin was introduced for the routine treatment of diabetes mellitus in the early 1980s without adequate comparison of efficacy to animal insulin preparations. First reports of altered hypoglycaemia awareness after transfer to human insulin made physicians and especially patients uncertain about potential adverse effects of human insulin. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of different insulin species by evaluating their efficacy (in particular glycaemic control) and adverse effects profile (mainly hypoglycaemia). SEARCH STRATEGY: A highly sensitive search for randomised controlled trials combined with key terms for identifying studies on human versus animal insulin was performed using the Cochrane Library (issue 2, 2002), Medline (1966 to May, 2002) and Embase (1974 to February, 2002). We also searched reference lists and databases of ongoing trials. Date of latest search: May 2002. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled clinical trials with diabetic patients of all ages that compared human to animal (for the most part purified porcine) insulin. Trial duration had to be at least one month in order to achieve reliable results on the main outcome parameter glycated haemoglobin. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial selection as well as evaluation of study quality was performed by two independent reviewers. The quality of reporting of each trial was assessed according to a modification of the quality criteria as specified by Schulz and by Jadad. MAIN RESULTS: Altogether 2156 participants took part in the 45 randomised controlled studies that were discovered through extensive search efforts. Though many studies were of a randomised, double-blind design, most studies were of poor methodological quality. Purified porcine and semi-synthetic insulin were most often investigated. No significant differences in metabolic control or hypoglycaemic episodes between various insulin species could be elucidated. Insulin dose and insulin antibodies did not show relevant dissimilarities. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: A comparison of the effects of human and animal insulin as well as of the adverse reaction profile did not show clinically relevant differences. Many patient-oriented outcomes like health-related quality of life or diabetes complications and mortality were never investigated in high-quality randomised clinical trials. The story of the introduction of human might be repeated by contemporary launching campaigns to introduce pharmaceutical and technological innovations that are not backed up by sufficient proof of their advantages and safety.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

The human insulin analog insulin lispro improves insulin binding on circulating monocytes of intensively treated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients.

The rapidly absorbed analog of human insulin, insulin lispro (LP), is characterized by a faster onset of action, a higher peak insulin level, and a shorter duration of action compared with regular insulin (RI). The aim of this study was to investigate whether intensified treatment with either LP or RI influences insulin receptor status. Twelve patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) participating in a multicenter randomized cross-over trial were allocated to this study. Four patients began with LP, whereas eight patients started with RI. Each patient was switched to the other insulin after a 3-month treatment period. Competitive [125I]A-14-insulin binding studies were performed with isolated monocytes. Treatment with insulin lispro increased the total number of insulin binding sites from 9,400 +/- 2,200 (RI) to 20,300 +/- 3,000 (LP)/monocyte (P < 0.001). The insulin concentration required for a 50% competition of [125I]insulin binding (IC50) decreased from 0.6 +/- 0.2 (RI) to 0.1 +/- 0.03 (LP) nmol/L, indicating significantly higher affinity of insulin binding sites during LP treatment (P < 0.001). In additional experiments, the time course of insulin binding was determined after an oral meal. In LP-treated IDDM patients, the affinity and capacity of insulin binding showed a nadir 1 h after insulin injection and a regained binding affinity and capacity 5 h later. These changes observed after LP treatment were comparable to the effect of endogenous insulin secretion in healthy control subjects. In contrast, the IDDM patients who injected RI showed a decreasing insulin binding affinity and capacity, most markedly expressed after 5 h. The corresponding serum levels of insulin were inversely correlated with the affinity and capacity of insulin-binding sites. Pretreatment of cultured human IM-9 lymphoblasts with LP or RI yielded no difference in the down-regulation of insulin binding. In summary, intensified conventional insulin therapy with LP increased the number and affinity of insulin receptors on circulating monocytes to a level similar to that observed in healthy subjects. We conclude that the improved insulin receptor status observed during LP treatment is caused by its more physiological pharmacokinetic profile.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Hepatic fat content and insulin action on free fatty acids and glucose metabolism rather than insulin absorption are associated with insulin requirements during insulin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients.

To determine causes of interindividual variation in insulin requirements, we recruited 20 type 2 diabetic patients with stable glucose control and insulin doses for >1 year on combination therapy with bedtime NPH insulin and metformin. Insulin absorption (increase in free and total insulin over 8 h after a subcutaneous dose of regular insulin) and actions of intravenous (6-h 0.3 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1) euglycemic insulin clamp combined with [3-3H]glucose) and subcutaneous (glucose infusion rate required to maintain isoglycemia and suppression of free fatty acids [FFAs]) insulin, liver fat content (proton spectroscopy), visceral fat (magnetic resonance imaging), weight, and body composition were determined. We found the following variation in parameters: insulin dose range 10-176 U (mean 42 U, fold variation 17.6x) or 0.13-1.39 U/kg (0.44 U/kg, 10.7x), absorbed insulin 10.6x, action of subcutaneous insulin to suppress FFAs 7.5 x and to stimulate glucose metabolism (M value) 11.5x, body weight 67-127 kg (91 kg, 1.9x), liver fat 2-28% (12%, 14x), and visceral fat 179-2,053 ml (1,114 ml, 11.5x). The amount of insulin absorbed, measured as either free or total insulin, was significantly correlated with its ability to suppress FFAs and stimulate glucose metabolism but not with the insulin dose per se. The actions of absorbed insulin were, on the other hand, significantly correlated with the daily insulin dose (r = 0.70 for action on FFAs, P < 0.001, and r = -0.61 for M value, P < 0.005). Actions of subcutaneous and intravenous insulin to suppress FFAs were significantly correlated (r = 0.82, P < 0.001, R2 = 67%). Of the measures of adiposity, the percent hepatic fat was the parameter best correlated with the daily insulin dose (r = 0.76, P < 0.001). The percent hepatic fat was also significantly correlated with the ability of intravenous insulin to suppress endogenous glucose production (r = 0.72, P < 0.005). We conclude that the major reason for interindividual variation in insulin requirements in type 2 diabetes is the variation in insulin action. Variation in hepatic fat content may influence insulin requirements via an effect on the sensitivity of endogenous glucose production to insulin.

Absorption↗
PubMed1997

The relation of proinsulin, insulin, and proinsulin-to-insulin ratio to insulin sensitivity and acute insulin response in normoglycemic subjects.

Plasma levels of proinsulin and its conversion intermediates are elevated in NIDDM patients. Recent studies have suggested that proinsulin levels are also increased relative to insulin levels in subjects who subsequently develop NIDDM. This may be due to insulin resistance or a defect in proinsulin processing or insulin secretion. If insulin resistance is the trigger, the proinsulin-to-insulin ratio would be higher in insulin-resistant subjects than in insulin-sensitive subjects. We examined the association of fasting proinsulin, 32,33 split proinsulin, and the proinsulin-to-insulin ratio with insulin sensitivity (SI), estimated by a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test and the minimal model in 138 normoglycemic subjects ages 53-61 years. We also investigated the relation of proinsulins and the proinsulin-to-insulin ratio to acute insulin response (AIR). Fasting specific insulin (r = -0.64), intact proinsulin (r = -0.43), and 32,33 split proinsulin (r = -0.54) concentrations were inversely correlated and the proinsulin-to-insulin ratio positively (r = 0.31) correlated with SI (P < 0.001). Fasting specific insulin (r = 0.64), intact proinsulin (r = 0.35), and 32,33 split proinsulin (r = 0.45) concentrations were positively correlated and proinsulin-to-insulin ratio (r = -0.40) inversely correlated with AIR (P < 0.001). The proinsulin-to-insulin ratio increased by increasing levels of SI (quartiles of SI from low to high: 0.048, 0.078, 0.078, 0.068; P = 0.012) and decreased by increasing AIR (quartiles of AIR from low to high: 0.088, 0.068, 0.058, 0.058; P = 0.005). These associations were independent of age, sex, BMI, and waist-to-hip ratio. Furthermore, the relation between the proinsulin-to-insulin ratio and AIR was independent of SI. In conclusion, in normoglycemic subjects, insulin resistance (low SI) was associated with a low rather than a high proinsulin-to-insulin ratio. Subjects who maintained normoglycemia with a low AIR had an increased proinsulin-to-insulin ratio compared with those who needed high AIR to maintain normoglycemia. These results suggest that, in subjects with normal glucose tolerance, insulin resistance does not induce increased proinsulin relative to insulin secretion, but rather is associated with enhanced processing of proinsulin.

Blood Glucose↗
PubMed1999

The relation of proinsulin and insulin to insulin sensitivity and acute insulin response in subjects with newly diagnosed type II diabetes: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Proinsulin concentrations are increased relative to insulin concentrations in subjects with Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. This could be secondary to hyperglycaemia or insulin resistance or due to a defect in insulin secretion. METHODS: We investigated the association between fasting insulin, intact proinsulin and the intact proinsulin: insulin ratio with insulin sensitivity, estimated by a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test and the minimal model and with acute insulin response (AIR) in 182 newly diagnosed Type II diabetic subjects aged 40 to 69 years. None of the subjects was receiving hypoglycaemic medication. RESULTS: Insulin sensitivity correlated inversely with fasting insulin (r(s) = -0.42) and intact proinsulin (r(s) = -0.32) (p < 0.001). The intact proinsulin:insulin ratio was not correlated with insulin sensitivity. AIR correlated positively with intact proinsulin (r(s) = 0.23) and inversely with the intact proinsulin:insulin ratio (r(s) = -0.29, p < 0.001). Fasting glucose correlated positively with intact proinsulin (r(s) = 0.34) and the intact proinsulin:insulin ratio (r(s) = 0.24, p < 0. 001). The intact proinsulin:insulin ratio increased by decreasing AIR (quartiles of AIR from high to low: 7.8, 8.2, 9.7 and 12.1 %, p < 0.001). This association was independent of age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, fasting glucose, and insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: Insulin resistance (low insulin sensitivity) was not related to the intact proinsulin:insulin ratio in subjects with Type II diabetes. In contrast, both low AIR and high fasting glucose concentrations were associated with a disproportionate increase in proinsulin concentration. These results suggest that increased intact proinsulin:insulin ratio is a marker of a defect in insulin secretion in Type II diabetic subjects.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Adverse effects of insulin antibodies on postprandial plasma glucose and insulin profiles in diabetic patients without immune insulin resistance. Implications for intensive insulin regimens.

To assess the possible influence of moderate titer insulin antibodies on diabetic glycemic control, we examined insulin-antibody equilibrium binding characteristics, postprandial glucose tolerance, and plasma free-insulin profiles after subcutaneous injection of both porcine and human insulin (0.15 U/kg) in 12 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus under conditions stimulating intensive insulin therapy. The patients' antibodies bound porcine and human insulin indistinguishably, and their plasma glucose and free-insulin profiles after ingestion of a standard meal were similar with both insulins. Initial increases in plasma free-insulin levels after injection of both insulins were negatively correlated with both insulin-antibody binding (r = -.55, P less than .006) and postprandial hyperglycemia (peak level r = -.56, P less than .006); the latter was positively correlated with insulin-antibody binding (r = .48, P less than .02). The effects of insulin antibodies on postprandial plasma free-insulin and glucose levels could be accounted for substantially by the association constant of the high-affinity insulin-antibody binding sites (K1); patients in the highest quartile for K1 had significantly slower initial increments in plasma free insulin (0.31 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.46 +/- 0.06 microU/min, P less than .05) and greater postprandial hyperglycemia (peak value 237 +/- 10 vs. 166 +/- 12 mg/dl, P less than .001) than patients in the lowest quartile. We conclude that moderate insulin-antibody titers commonly found in insulin-treated patients can slow the early increase in plasma free insulin after subcutaneous injection and that this impairs postprandial glucose tolerance; such an effect may limit the effectiveness of intensive insulin therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The renal metabolism of insulin: urinary insulin excretion in patients with mutant insulin syndrome (insulin Wakayama).

Many studies have shown that the kidney plays an important role in the metabolism of many proteins and small peptides. To understand insulin handling in the kidney, we examined urinary insulin excretion under several conditions in patients with mutant insulin syndrome (MIS; insulin Wakayama). Urinary excretion of insulin was studied using high-performance liquid chromatography analysis in patients with MIS. In these patients, most of the insulin extracted from a 24-hour urine collection and from urine collected after stimulation of insulin secretion by glucose or glucagon was normal insulin, whereas 90% of serum insulin is structurally abnormal (Leu-A3 insulin). On the other hand, arginine, which is known as an inhibitor of renal tubular reabsorption, increased urinary excretion of Leu-A3 insulin. The ratio of Leu-A3 and normal insulin in urine after arginine was similar to that in serum. A large amount of Leu-A3 insulin is excreted in urine when reabsorption of insulin at renal tubules is inhibited by arginine. These data indicate that normal and Leu-A3 insulin are filtered through the glomerulus with relatively little restriction. Using the fact that basal urine has a high concentration of normal insulin and an extremely low concentration of Leu-A3 insulin, which has less receptor-binding affinity, we speculated some possibilities. One possibility is that both forms of insulin are reabsorbed by the tubular cells, but with different efficiencies. Leu-A3 insulin absorption in more complete, and this suggests differences in the uptake pathways that may account for the differences in response to arginine infusions. Another possibility is that only normal insulin is secreted from tubules into urine which is mediated by receptors. Our results provide new insight into renal metabolism of insulin and showed that MIS is a useful model for studying it.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Demonstration of receptors for insulin and insulin-like growth factors on Swarm rat chondrosarcoma chondrocytes. Evidence that insulin stimulates proteoglycan synthesis through the insulin receptor.

The insulin-like growth factor, multiplication stimulating activity (MSA), and insulin were recently shown to stimulate proteoglycan synthesis in monolayer cultures of chondrocytes derived from the Swarm rat chondrosarcoma. Insulin produced significant stimulation at a concentration of less than 1 ng/ml, suggesting that insulin was acting through the insulin receptor rather than through a somatomedin receptor. In this paper we have shown that the insulin-like growth factors IGF-I and IGF-II also are potent stimulators of [35S]sulfate incorporation into macromolecules recovered from the medium and cell layer matrix of the chondrosarcoma chondrocytes. Proinsulin was 3% as potent as insulin in stimulating [35S]sulfate incorporation. We identified receptors for insulin and the insulin-like growth factors, MSA, IGF-I, and IGF-II. Insulin, at concentrations 1000 times the concentration required to produce the biologic response, did not compete for binding of 125I-MSA-II-1 or of 125I-IGF-II and only partially competed for 125I-IGF-I binding. Anti-insulin receptor IgG stimulated proteoglycan synthesis and competed for 125I-insulin binding. Fab fragment prepared from anti-insulin receptor IgG completely blocked the stimulation of [35S]sulfate incorporation into macromolecules by insulin while only partially inhibiting the biologic response to insulin-like growth factors, MSA, IGF-I, and IGF-II. Similarly, the anti-insulin receptor IgG only partially inhibited the binding of 125I-IGF-I and 125I-IGF-II while completely blocking the binding of 125I-insulin. We conclude that insulin stimulates proteoglycan synthesis in the chondrosarcoma chondrocytes by acting through the insulin receptor whereas the insulin-like growth factors probably act through their own receptors.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Prolonged sulfonylurea administration decreases insulin resistance and increases insulin secretion in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: evidence for improved insulin action at a postreceptor site in hepatic as well as extrahepatic tissues.

To determine whether long-term sulfonylurea therapy ameliorates glucose homeostasis in patients with NIDDM predominantly by improving insulin secretion or by improving insulin action, we evaluated changes in fasting plasma glucose concentrations, intravenous glucose tolerance, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, facilitation of glucose disposal by exogenous insulin, and erythrocyte insulin receptor binding before and after prolonged (congruent to 4 mo) administration of tolazamide to 18 patients with NIDDM. Before tolazamide administration, 15 patients had decreased insulin secretion (50 +/- 31 vs 577 +/- 176 microU/ml X 10 min in nondiabetic subjects, P less than 0.05) and insulin resistance (Km 166 +/- 31 vs 58 +/- 3 microU/ml in nondiabetic subjects, P less than 0.05; Vmax 7.3 +/- 0.6 vs 9.8 +/- 0.2 mg/kg/min in nondiabetic subjects, P less than 0.05), whereas the other three patients had comparably impaired insulin secretion (56 +/- 52 microU/ml X min) but were not insulin resistant (Km 70 +/- 6 microU/ml; Vmax 10.8 +/- 0.6 mg/kg/min). The insulin-resistant patients had fasting hyperinsulinemia (19 +/- 4 vs 11 +/- 1 microU/ml in nondiabetic subjects, P less than 0.05), decreased erythrocyte insulin receptor binding (4.8 +/- 0.4 vs 5.8 +/- 0.3%/1.6 X 10(9) cells in nondiabetic subjects, P less than 0.05), and impairment in both insulin-induced suppression of glucose production (Km 97 +/- 31 vs 21 +/- 7 microU/ml in nondiabetic subjects, P less than 0.05), and insulin-induced stimulation of glucose utilization (Km and Vmax 176 +/- 29 microU/ml and 5.8 +/- 0.7 mg/kg/min vs 50 +/- 2 microU/ml and 9.1 +/- 0.6 mg/kg/min in nondiabetic subjects, both P less than 0.05). The nonresistant patients were not hyperinsulinemic (12 +/- micU/ml), had normal insulin receptor binding (5.9 +/- 0.5%/1.6 X 10(9) cells), and were less hyperglycemic than the insulin-resistant patients (128 +/- 11 vs 181 +/- 12 mg/dl, P less than 0.05). After tolazamide administration, both the early phase of glucose-induced insulin secretion (56 +/- 52 vs 141 +/- 68 microU/ml . 10 min) and insulin binding (5.9 +/- 0.5 vs 7.0 +/- 0.5%/1.6 X 10(9) cells) increased in all three nonresistant patients, but there was no consistent improvement in fasting hyperglycemia (128 +/- 11 vs 130 +/- 24 mg/dl), intravenous glucose tolerance (Kivgtt 0.77 +/- 0.18 vs 0.89 +/- 0.29%/min), or facilitation of glucose disposal by insulin (Km 70 +/- 5 vs 64 +/- 5 microU/ml; Vmax 10.8 +/- 0.6 vs 10.1 +/- 0.2 mg/kg/min).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Effects of anti-insulin antibody on insulin binding to liver membranes: evidence against antibody-induced enhancement of insulin binding to the insulin receptor.

In the presence of anti-insulin antibody, 2-to 3-fold enhancement of 125I-insulin binding to liver membranes was observed when binding was estimated by the radioactivity of 125I-insulin bound to the membrane pellets. However, after 125I-insulin was covalently cross-linked to liver membranes using disuccinimidyl suberate in the presence of anti-insulin antibody, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography showed that 125I-insulin bound to the alpha-subunit of the insulin receptor was inhibited by anti-insulin insulin antibody in an dose-dependent manner. More importantly, at an anti-insulin antibody dilution range between 1:50 and 1:5,000, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed two 125I-labelled bands of mol wt 62,000 and 27,000, while only one band of mol wt 130,000 was revealed in the absence of anti-insulin antibody. These Mr = 62,000 and Mr = 27,000 bands were found to be the heavy and the light chain of anti-insulin IgG molecules respectively. Pepsin digested anti-insulin serum had only an inhibitory effect on 125I-insulin binding to liver membranes. Non-immunized guinea pig serum or IgG completely abolished the enhanced effect of anti-insulin antibody. Further, this enhanced effect was inhibited by Fc fragment-specific anti-IgG serum or H&L-chain-specific anti-IgG serum in a dose-dependent manner. Protein A also inhibited the effect of anti-insulin antibody. In IM-9 lymphocytes and human red blood cell ghosts, which have no Fc gamma receptors, enhancement of insulin binding was not observed in the presence of anti-insulin antibody.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗