SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A recent meeting jointly sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) brought together researchers active in nanotechnology and cancer molecular biology to discuss and evaluate the interface between disciplines. Emerging areas where nanotechnologies may impact cancer prevention and early cancer detection were elaborated by key researchers who catalyzed interdisciplinary dialogue aimed at fostering cross-discipline communications and future collaboration.
Issues of institutional identity and integrity in Roman Catholic health care institutions have been addressed at the level of individual institutions as well as by organizations of Catholic health care providers and at various levels in the Church hierarchy. The papers by Carol Taylor, C.S.F.N., Thomas Shannon, Kevin O'Rourke, O.P., Gerard Magill in this volume provide a significant contribution to concerns of Roman Catholic health care institutions as they face the challenges of providing health care in a secular, pluralistic, market-driven economy. One way to understand institutional integrity is as a measure of the coherence between what an institution identifies as its commitments (its stated moral character), what an institution does (its manifest moral character) and an institution's fundamental moral commitments (its deep moral character). The essays in this volume support this model of integrity. Although it is not their explicit focus, the four essays together provide a vision of institutional integrity for Catholic health care institutions. Each author focuses on one of the three central aspects of integrity: what one identifies as one's commitments (Taylor), how one's actions reflect one's values (Shannon and Magill), and what one is or what one values at a deep level (O'Rourke). I will offer a brief overview of the ways in which the integrity of Catholic health care institutions has been addressed. Then I will consider the four essays and show how each offers an analysis of one of the three critical elements of integrity.
Absent a clear and enforceable national policy on cancer genetic testing and genetic research, the responsibility may currently be on institutional review boards to regulate those activities at their institutions through protocol approval or disapproval. The survey reported here was carried out to gain information on National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center policies governing institutional review board review of genetic protocols and the preparedness of institutional review boards to review genetic protocols. Thirty-five responses (63% response rate) were received, of which 30 were evaluable. Twenty-four responders reported that they believed that there is a need for research that may lead to improved review of genetic research and genetic testing protocols. Only 14 responders felt adequately informed of current and developing issues and legislation relative to genetic testing and research. Seven responders reported that their cancer centers require an institutional review board-approved protocol for genetic testing activities. Five responders reported that their cancer centers have a formal written policy that guides institutional review board review of genetic testing protocols. About half of the responders reported that their cancer centers have no formal written policy that guides institutional review board review of genetic research protocols. Only three responders reported that institutional review board members receive formal training to prepare them to evaluate all of the issues associated with genetic protocols. We conclude that greater effort needs to be made to establish uniform policy governing cancer genetic testing and genetic research and greater effort should be made to prepare institutional review boards formally for the review of genetic-related protocols.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: An estimated 20% of allogeneic blood transfusions in the United States are associated with cardiac surgery. National consensus guidelines for allogeneic transfusion associated with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery have existed since the mid- to late 1980s. The appropriateness and uniformity of institutional transfusion practice was questioned in 1991. An assessment of current transfusion practice patterns was warranted. METHODS: The Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia database consists of comprehensive information on the course of surgery in 2,417 randomly selected patients undergoing CABG surgery at 24 institutions. A subset of 713 patients expected to be at low risk for transfusion was examined. Allogeneic transfusion was evaluated across institutions. Institution as an independent risk factor for allogeneic transfusion was determined in a multivariable model. RESULTS: Significant variability in institutional transfusion practice was observed for allogeneic packed red blood cells (PRBCs) (27-92% of patients transfused) and hemostatic blood components (platelets, 0-36%; fresh frozen plasma, 0-36%; cryoprecipitate, 0-17% of patients transfused). For patients at institutions with liberal rather than conservative transfusion practice, the odds ratio for transfusion of PRBCs was 6.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-10.8) and for hemostatic blood components it was 2 (95% CI, 1.2-3.4). Institution was an independent determinant of transfusion risk associated with CABG surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Institutions continue to vary significantly in their transfusion practices for CABG surgery. A more rational and conservative approach to transfusion practice at the institutional level is warranted.
Institution-oriented and resident-oriented care practices for institutionalized retarded persons investigated in 166 Living units in 19 institutions in the United States and 11 institutions in a Scandinavian country. Living units in the Scandinavian country were found to be more resident-oriented than those in the United States. Large central institutions were characterized by the most institution-oriented care practices, group homes by the most resident-oriented practices, with large and small regional centers falling between these extremes. Within types of institution, care practices were generally homogeneous. Living units for more severely retarded residents were characterized by more institution-oriented practices. Large living-unit size was found to be predictive of institution-oriented practices while cost/resident/day, number of aides/resident, and number of professional staff/resident did not predict care practices. Characteristics of the Child Management Inventory were also examined.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether substantial institutional variability exists in red blood cell conservation practices associated with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized patient enrollment and data collection. SETTING: Twenty-four U.S. academic institutions participating in the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia. PARTICIPANTS: A well-defined subset of primary CABG surgery patients (n = 713) expected to be at low risk for bleeding and exposure to allogeneic transfusion. INTERVENTIONS: None (observational study). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Frequency of use of red blood cell conservation techniques was determined among institutions. Correlation was determined between use of each technique and transfusion of allogeneic red blood cells and between use of each technique and median institutional blood loss. Significant variability (p < 0.01) was detected in institutional transfusion practice with respect to the use of predonated autologous whole blood, normovolemic hemodilution, red cell salvage, and reinfusion of shed mediastinal blood. The frequency of institutional use of these techniques was not associated with allogeneic transfusion (r2 < 0.15) or blood loss (r2 < 0.10) in the low-risk population of patients examined. CONCLUSIONS: Institutions vary significantly in perioperative blood conservation practices for CABG surgery. Further study to determine the appropriate use of these techniques is warranted.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.