Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “INHALATION THERAPY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

Sudden deafness: a comparison of anticoagulant therapy and carbogen inhalation therapy.

Sudden deafness (SD) is a sudden or rapidly progressive, partial or complete, typically unilateral sensorineural hearing impairment that has no known specific etiologic factor. This study was designed to compare, in a group of 168 consecutive patients with SD, the effect of anticoagulant therapy and carbogen inhalation therapy. Special attention was paid to the shape of the audiogram relative to the clinical outcome and the treatment modality. We found that the configuration of the audiogram of SD patients is prognostic of the outcome, and that patients with a low-frequency-sloping hearing impairment have a better prognosis compared to the patients with a high-sloping loss. Anticoagulant treatment was most effective in low-sloping hearing losses, while carbogen inhalation may be more effective for patients with high-sloping hearing losses.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2000

Parental concern towards the use of inhaled therapy in children with chronic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Parental attitudes towards the use of inhaled therapy in children with chronic asthma influence treatment adherence and outcome. In the present study, we evaluated the perceptions and concerns of parents of children with chronic asthma towards inhaled therapy. METHODS: A self-administered standard questionnaire was distributed to parents of children attending the Paediatric Asthma Clinic. All these children required inhaled steroids for treatment. RESULTS: One-hundred and twelve of 170 parents (66%) surveyed were concerned with inhaled therapy. The most common concern with its use was medication side effects (91%), followed by 'inhaler dependency' (86%), cost of the inhaler (34%) and difficulty in using the inhaler (15%). Parental perception that the oral route was superior to the inhaled route, preference for the oral route for asthma prophylaxis and a higher steroid dose required for prophylaxis were more likely to be associated with concerns towards inhaled therapy. More importantly, these children were also more likely to miss > 25% of their prescribed doses of inhaled steroids (46 vs 22% in the group concerned about inhaled therapy compared with the group that was not concerned, respectively; P = 0.007) and had a higher mean number of nebulization treatments in the last year (3.2 +/- 2.9 vs 1.8 +/- 1.3 in the group concerned about inhaled therapy compared with the group that was not concerned, respectively; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of parents whose children were on inhaled prophylaxis had concerns towards the use of inhaled therapy. Parental concern towards inhaled therapy appeared to increase the problem of non-adherence to treatment. Education for these parents will need to be addressed to improve asthma management in our patient population.

Administration, Inhalation↗