Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Hirudin Therapy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

[Hirudin therapy and blood coagulability].

The changes in blood coagulative properties, which occur in the treatment with medical leeches, were studied in 57 patients with coronary heart, rheumatic and chronic pulmonary diseases. Hirudin therapy was established to affect blood coagulation. The leech salina penetrated into the skin wound to block hemostasis. Having entered the circulating blood, some part of the saliva normalized its impaired coagulative properties. The correction of the above abnormalities and related bleeding indicate it beneficial to use hirudin therapy in secondary coagulopathies and circulatory decompensation.

Blood Coagulation↗
PubMed2000

Hirudin therapy during thrombolysis for venous thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the most common drug-related thrombocytopenia. Thromboembolic complications occur in approximately 50% of patients with HIT and result in limb amputation and death in up to 20% and 30% respectively. Because patients with a history of HIT may require future intravenous anticoagulation but have a high-risk of thromboembolism if re-challenged with heparin, alternative therapies are necessary when further anticoagulation is indicated. The use of direct thrombin inhibitors in HIT patients who also require thrombolytic therapy offers unique challenges to anticoagulant monitoring and safety. We present a case of progressive ileofemoral deep venous thrombosis in a patient with a history of HIT in order to review the combined use of hirudin and thrombolysis in this setting.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2002

Monitoring of hirudin therapy with the Thrombelastograph.

Lepirudin is a specific thrombin inhibitor that is used for anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who are also undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Monitoring of lepirudin during CPB has been carried out with activated clotting time and ecarin clotting time. Correlation is poor with the former method, whereas ecarin clotting time is not widely available. A patient is described with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who underwent CPB, where coagulation monitoring was accomplished with the Thrombelastograph. This more widely available method may be useful in such patients.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2003

Clinical utility of subcutaneous hirudins.

The clinical utility of subcutaneous hirudins is discussed. The term "hirudins" refers to a class of antithrombotic agents structurally derived from the medicinal leech salivary protein hirudin. Breakthroughs in biotechnology over the past 20 years have resulted in the development of recombinant versions of hirudin (r-hirudin). Lepirudin is one such r-hirudin that is identical to natural hirudin except for the substitution of leucine for isoleucine at the N-terminus and the elimination of a sulfate group on the tyrosine at position 63. Another r-hirudin, desirudin, is identical to hirudin except for a valine-valine in the N-terminus and the absence of the sulfate group on tyrosine at position 63. Both r-hirudins are bivalent and tightly bind to both the catalytic site and the exposite of thrombin to exert their inhibitory effects on thrombin. Unfractionated heparin (UF) and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are widely used in medical and surgical patients to prevent and treat arterial and venous thrombotic events. Besides bleeding, the major adverse effect of heparins is heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT is associated with a paradoxical hypercoagulable state and marked risk of clinical thrombosis. Management of HIT requires the immediate cessation of all heparin exposure, and the initiation of an alternative anticoagulant. Because r-hirudins are effective agents and do not cross-react with HIT-associated antibodies, they are excellent anticoagulants in patients with past or current HIT. Clinical trials have also demonstrated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (s.c.) r-hirudins compared to heparins in non-HIT settings. Results of these trials support the use of r-hirudin therapy in patients with HIT or at risk of developing HIT. Additionally, case reports have described safe and effective use of s.c. r-hirudin therapy in the outpatient setting in both HIT and non-HIT patients.

Antithrombins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Use of ecarin clotting time in whole blood for monitoring recombinant hirudine treatment during cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia].

Lepirudin (Refludan is a recombinant hirudin, approved for anticoagulation treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia patients with thrombosis. We report here our method for laboratory monitoring with ecarin clotting time (ECT) of hirudin therapy as anticoagulation for cardiac surgery. Ecarin is extracted from the Echis carinatus snake venom and directly converts prothrombin to its intermediate, meizothrombin. This one binds in a stoechiometric way to hirudin to be proportioned in whole blood. The activation of coagulation starts up only when the totality of the hirudin is bound to the meizothrombin. To minimize the effect of dilution related to the CEC on the prothrombin and fibrinogen levels, thus lengthening the ECT, the specimen to be tested is diluted with normal whole blood. In 1997, when we have performed our first surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, only one team (Pötzsch et al., 1997) had described the use of the ECT in whole blood. We describe in this work our assay to dose hirudin with ECT after dilution in whole blood. This assay was used during 8 CEC among 7 patients affected with HIT (n = 6) or potentially sensitized with heparin (n = 1). Experimental conditions and interpretation of the assay are reported here. This test is fast enough to provide useful information for adjusting the dose during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

[Direct thrombin antagonists].

BACKGROUND: Inhibiting thrombin as a key enzyme of the coagulation cascade is therapeutically useful in thromboembolic diseases. In coronary thrombosis, direct thrombin inhibitors promise to be useful for an efficacious therapy. Hirudin and recombinant or synthetic mimetics like hirulog, argatroban and melagatran have proven their efficacy in clinical studies. CONCLUSION: Therapy with direct thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin and analogous substances reduces coronary events. Moreover, the agents are useful for therapy of thromboembolic diseases, especially in the case of heparin induced thrombocytopenia type II.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions to hirudin.

Hirudin is one of the new synthetic antithrombin agents, which is most commonly used in patients with type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and in patients with hypersensitivity reactions to unfractionated heparin as well as low-molecular-weight heparins. Hirudin is comparable to heparin as an antithrombotic agent and also has been studied as a primary treatment in patients who experienced acute myocardial infarctions. We describe a patient with a history of type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who was placed on intravenous hirudin therapy. After extravasation of the intravenous hirudin site, the patient developed a delayed hypersensitivity reaction that histologically showed an epithelioid granulomatous infiltrate. Although rare reports of hypersensitivity reactions to hirudin have been published, these reactions have not been well characterized and the histopathologic changes have not been described.

Biopsy↗
PubMed2001

Prognostic significance of thrombocytopenia during hirudin and heparin therapy in acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation: Organization to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes (OASIS-2)study.

BACKGROUND: The development of thrombocytopenia in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) appears to be associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Unfractionated heparin is a recognized cause of thrombocytopenia, but the incidence, predictors, and prognostic significance of thrombocytopenia during hirudin therapy in ACS have not been reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with ACS without ST elevation were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive a 72-hour intravenous infusion of unfractionated heparin or hirudin. Platelet counts were measured at baseline and within 24 hours of completion of study drug. The overall incidence of thrombocytopenia (<100x10(9)/L) was 1% and was similar in unfractionated heparin- and hirudin-treated patients (P:=0.42). Thrombocytopenia during study drug infusion was an independent predictor of 7-day outcomes, including death (OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 1.9 to 25); the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and recurrent ischemia (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.5); revascularization (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.2 to 7.1); and major bleeding (OR, 8.3; 95% CI, 3.4 to 17.7). Among patients who developed thrombocytopenia, hirudin (OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 2.6 to 11.3) but not unfractionated heparin (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 0.3 to 14.4) therapy was associated with a significantly increased risk of major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Early-onset thrombocytopenia in patients with ACS without ST elevation is strongly associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including death, ischemic events, and bleeding. The excess of major bleeding in hirudin-treated patients who develop thrombocytopenia suggests that thrombocytopenia may contribute to the increased risk of bleeding observed with hirudin.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1996

[Current point of view on medical treatment of unstable angina].

The combined death/infarct rate in the weeks following unstable angina ranges from 10 to 40%. Aspirin and GP IIb/IIIa antagonists reduce the mortality and morbidity, which has not been demonstrated with heparin. The short term clinical results of treatment with hirudin are better than those with heparin. A rebound biological effect after heparin or hirudin therapy may have adverse clinical consequences. Nitrate derivatives have a role to play and adjuvant therapy includes the betablockers and some calcium antagonists in special indications.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1996

Selective inhibition of factor Xa during thrombolytic therapy markedly improves coronary artery patency in a canine model of coronary thrombosis.

The success of current thrombolytic strategies is undermined by ongoing thrombin activity, but it is uncertain whether prevention of thrombin generation or direct thrombin antagonism is effective in achieving more optimal thrombolysis. To address this question, 24 dogs with electrically induced coronary thrombus undergoing thrombolysis with tissue-type plasminogen activator (1 mg/kg) over 20 min, were given one of the following adjunctive regimens in a random fashion. Twelve dogs received saline, and served as the control group; a direct thrombin antagonist, hirudin, was given at a dose of 20 micrograms/kg/min for 90 min to six dogs, and a selective factor Xa inhibitor, tick anticoagulant peptide (TAP), was administered to six dogs at a dose of 30 micrograms/kg/min for 90 min. The time to reperfusion was similar in the saline and hirudin groups (34 +/- 4 vs 37 +/- 7 min; P = NS) but shorter in the TAP group (21 +/- 4 min; P < 0.05). Coronary blood flow was restored to 100% of its baseline value for 7 +/- 2 min in control dogs, and for 20 +/- 6 min in the hirudin group (P < 0.05). In the TAP group, coronary blood flow was restored to 100% of its baseline value for more than 120 min in all dogs (P < 0.01 vs others treatments). Reocclusion occurred in 89% and 50% of dogs receiving saline and hirudin, respectively (P = NS), but in none of the TAP-treated dogs (P < 0.01). Plasma fibrinopeptide A (FpA) and thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) levels were determined in all dogs as indicators of thrombin activation. In the saline group, FpA and TAT during reperfusion were 19 +/- 2 ng/ml and 104 +/- 24 ng/ml respectively (P < 0.02 vs baseline) indicating high thrombin activity. In contrast, during reperfusion in hirudin-treated dogs FpA and TAT remained similar to baseline (10 +/- 3 ng/ml and 53 +/- 4 ng/ml respectively; both P < 0.05 vs saline). Reperfusion in TAP-treated dogs did not alter FpA and TAT in plasma, which remained similar to baseline (9 +/- 1 ng/ml and 39 +/- 5 ng/ml respectively; both P < 0.05 vs saline). Scanning electron microscopy of coronary arteries showed residual thrombi with intense platelet and fibrin deposition adherent to the deendothelialized surface of the vessels following saline and hirudin therapy. In contrast, TAP-treated arteries were characterized by the absence of fibrin and minimal platelet deposition. In conclusion, these hemodynamic, biochemical and morphologic data suggest that adjunctive treatment with a higher tier blockade of the coagulation cascade is superior to direct thrombin inhibition in maintaining coronary artery patency following thrombolysis in the experimental canine electrolytic model. These findings highlight the potential adverse effects of unchecked thrombin generation in the setting of thrombolytic therapy.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Anticoagulant therapy with recombinant hirudin in patients with thrombopenia induced by heparin].

OBJECTIVES: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an uncommon and severe complication of heparin therapy. Both venous and arterial thromboembolic events can occur, requiring withdrawal of the heparin therapy. When anticoagulant therapy is mandatory, recombinant hirudin can be used. METHODS: We used recombinant hirudin (HBW 023) in 6 patients with heparin induced thrombocytopenia. In case of venous thromboembolism, an initial intravenous bolus (0.07 mg/kg) was followed by continuous infusion (0.05 mg/kg/h); for arterial thromboembolism the initial bolus was 0.7 mg/kg and infusion rate 0.15 mg/kg/h. When possible oral anticoagulants were started and hirudin withdrawn when the INR ratio reached 3. RESULTS: The clinical course was uneventful in all 6 patients. There was no recurrent thromboembolism. Cephalin-activated coagulation time (patient/control) varied between 1.8 and 3.5 (median 2.4) during hirudin administration. Platelet count rose to the nadir (median 70 x 10(9)/l, range 15-90) reaching over 100 x 10(9)/l in all patients between the third and sixth day (median 5 days) after stopping heparin. CONCLUSION: Intravenous administration of hirudin provides effective immediate anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, thus allowing conversion to oral anticoagulants without risking recurrent thromboembolism.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Hirudin: clinical potential of a thrombin inhibitor.

Hirudin is the most potent and specific known inhibitor of thrombin, the enzyme that plays a key regulatory function in hemostasis and blood coagulation. The importance of thrombosis in cardiovascular disease has recently highlighted the limitations of existing antithrombotic drugs and the potential value of direct thrombin inhibition as an effective approach to antithrombotic therapy. Hirudin and a small peptidomimetic analog--hirulog--are being developed as alternatives to heparin for the treatment of unstable angina, for prevention of abrupt closure and restenosis following coronary angioplasty, for prevention of deep vein thrombosis after major orthopedic surgery, and as an adjunct to fibrinolytic therapy. Direct thrombin inhibitors have several potential advantages over heparin: They can inhibit thrombin bound to clots or extracellular matrices, which are relatively resistant to heparin; they do not require antithrombin III as a cofactor, which may lead to a more predictable dose response; and they are not inhibited by activated platelets, which release platelet factor 4 and other molecules that neutralize heparin. The results of early clinical studies suggest that hirudin and hirulog may be more efficacious and more predictable and may have fewer bleeding complications than heparin for several clinical indications.

Heparin↗
PubMed2002

Methods for the monitoring of direct thrombin inhibitors.

Direct thrombin inhibitors are available for prophylactic as well as therapeutic purposes. Application of hirudin in therapeutic doses has been shown to require drug monitoring. Currently, most experience is available for recombinant hirudin, but the principle aspects of drug monitoring are the same for all direct thrombin inhibitors. Most frequently, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and modifications of the activated clotting time (ACT) have been used for the monitoring of hirudin therapy. However, these methods are insensitive at plasma levels higher than 0.6 mg/L of hirudin, so that overdoses may be missed despite monitoring. Correlations between ecarin clotting time (ECT), enzyme immunoassays, and chromogenic substrate assays on one side and global tests on the other side are poor. Fully automated chromogenic substrate-based assays, also available as point-of-care tests (POCT), are more precise and sensitive and are not disturbed by interferents such as heparin and antithrombin. Good correlations can be observed between chromogenic assays and the ECT performed in plasma or whole blood samples. ECT can also be determined with POCT systems. Test characteristics such as imprecision and measuring range are comparable to those of the chromogenic assays. In conclusion, therapy with direct thrombin inhibitors should be monitored with chromogenic assays or ECT.

Antithrombins↗
PubMed1995

Frequency of "optimal anticoagulation" for acute myocardial infarction after thrombolysis with front-loaded recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator and conjunctive therapy with recombinant hirudin (HBW 023). ALKK Study Group.

This retrospective analysis reviewed 183 patients with acute myocardial infarction who were given front-loaded recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and r-hirudin (HBW 023) in 1 of 4 dose groups (bolus dose of 0.07, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg/kg, followed by an infusion of 0.05, 0.06, 0.1, or 0.15 mg/kg/hour over 48 hours). Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) levels were determined at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 48 hours. Of the 178 patients with r-hirudin treatment for > or = 12 hours, anticoagulation was optimal in 55.1% (all aPTTs > 2 x baseline), suboptimal in 33.7% (lowest aPTT > 1.5 but < 2 x baseline), and inadequate in 11.2% (> or = 1 aPTT but < 1.5 x baseline). Optimal anticoagulation was observed more frequently in the higher dose groups (dose 1, 15%; dose 2, 44.4%; dose 3, 63.4%; dose 4, 73.4%; p for trend < 0.0001). Patency (according to Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction trial grade 2 or 3) of the infarct artery after 36 to 48 hours was higher in the group with optimal anticoagulation compared with those with suboptimal or inadequate anticoagulation: 97.9%, 88.4%, and 85%, respectively (p = 0.03 optimal vs suboptimal or inadequate anticoagulation). In conclusion, r-hirudin in a dose of 0.1 or 0.15 mg/kg/hour achieves an optimal anticoagulation in about 63% or 74% of patients, which is associated with an enhanced patency 24 to 48 hours after rt-PA. A subsequent study revealed that this effective anticoagulation may be accompanied by an increased risk of severe bleeding complications after thrombolysis.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Patients with a history of type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis requiring cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective observational case series.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT) type II is a life-threatening complication of heparin therapy that most often occurs after 5-10 days of exposure to heparin. Anticoagulation is a significant concern for patients with HITT type II being prepared for cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We report a case series of 12 patients with a history HITT type II who underwent CPB and cardiac surgery. Six patients did not express the antibody that mediates HITT type II immediately before surgery. Heparin was used as the anticoagulant for the duration of CPB only, and all these patients did well without thrombotic complications. Six patients expressed the antibody that mediates HITT type II immediately before surgery. Hirudin was used as the anticoagulant for CPB in these patients. The ecarin clotting time was used to guide hirudin therapy during CPB. The patients receiving hirudin did well, but they had a large amount of bleeding, required transfusions of multiple allogeneic blood products, and had a frequent rate of reexploration of the mediastinum after CPB.

Adolescent↗