Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Headache Disorders, Primary”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Functional neuroimaging of primary headache disorders.

Until recently, primary headache disorders, such as migraine and cluster headache were considered to be vascular in origin. However, advances in neuroimaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging have augmented the growing clinical evidence that these headaches are primarily driven from the brain. This review covers functional imaging studies in migraine, cluster headache, rarer headache syndromes and experimental head pain. Together with newer techniques, such as voxel-based morphometry and magnetic resonance spectrometry, functional imaging continues to play a role in elucidating and targeting the neural substrates in each of the primary headache syndromes.

Blood Flow Velocity↗
PubMed2005

Functional neuroimaging of primary headache disorders.

Until recently, primary headache disorders such as migraine and cluster headache were considered to be vascular in origin. However, advances in neuroimaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography, single photon emission computerized tomography, and functional magnetic resonance imaging, have augmented the growing clinical evidence that these headaches are primarily driven from the brain. This review covers functional imaging studies in migraine, cluster headache, rarer headache syndromes, and experimental head pain. Together with newer techniques, such as voxel-based morphometry and magnetic resonance spectrometry, functional imaging continues to play a role in elucidating and targeting the neural substrates in each of the primary headache syndromes.

Brain↗
PubMed2004

Functional neuroimaging of primary headache disorders.

Until recently, primary headache disorders such as migraine and cluster headache were considered to be vascular in origin. However, advances in neuroimaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography, single photon emission computerized tomography, and functional magnetic resonance imaging, have augmented the growing clinical evidence that these headaches are primarily driven from the brain. This review covers functional imaging studies in migraine, cluster headache, rarer headache syndromes, and experimental head pain. Together with newer techniques, such as voxel-based morphometry and magnetic resonance spectrometry, functional imaging continues to play a role in elucidating and targeting the neural substrates in each of the primary headache syndromes.

Cerebrovascular Circulation↗
PubMed2006

Primary headache disorder in the emergency department: perspective from a general neurology outpatient clinic.

Over a six month period, 22% of patients with headache seen in general neurology outpatient clinics reported prior attendance at an emergency department because of their headache; 9% of the headache cohort had been admitted to hospital. All had primary headache disorders according to International Headache Society diagnostic criteria. Improved primary care services for headache patients are required to reduce the burden of primary headache disorders seen in emergency departments.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in primary headache disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The object of this review is to examine the published literature for cerebrospinal fluid laboratory measures of primary headache disorders to identify biomarkers and provide recommendations for future biomarker discovery. BACKGROUND: Biomarkers may distinguish deviation from a normal state, provide insight into mechanisms of pathophysiology, quantify the degree of change, discriminate what may be clinically overlapping disorders, and allow monitoring and/or selection of specific treatment. High-throughput, discovery technologies fuel the ability to reveal more biomarkers than past hypothesis-driven studies. DESIGN OR METHODS: Publications were identified in PubMed, ISI web of knowledge (both Web of Science and BIOSYS), and SciFinder, using the key words for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and migraine, headache, or biomarkers. Additional references were sought from the papers identified in these searches. Data were assessed relating to all primary headache types for clinical and scientific methods and results. RESULTS: Fifty-five out of 82 biomarkers were found from 55 publications, though none have been validated for clinical utility. Data for site (ventricular, cervical, lumbar) and timing of CSF collection, headache state, and diagnostic description were patchy, and controls were often poorly defined. Most routinely performed CSF measurements were within normal limits. Most levels of pain-related molecules were reduced, and concentrations of most neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, proteins, and small molecules were increased. Though few studies assessed the specificity of biomarkers for primary headaches, it is clear that there are differences in CSF biomarkers between migraine, cluster headache, tension-type headache, and trigeminal neuralgia. CONCLUSIONS: The high proportion (67%) of biomarkers identified from laboratory measures tested thus far predicts that many more biomarkers will be identified for primary headaches when more candidates are evaluated. In order to discover and evaluate more biomarkers, especially those that may have clinical application for headache management, 3 recommendations are encouraged: prospective design of care-independent studies; evaluation of more clinical variables; and evaluation of substantially more candidates by using discovery-based research methods. Outlines of approaches to pursue these aims are proposed.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed2004

Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of migraine and other primary headache disorders.

Clinical data and experience to date have demonstrated that BoNT-A is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for the prevention of migraine and other headache disorders. It has a long duration of action that may last over 4 months with no systemic or serious AEs. Several issues remain to be defined, however, including dosing, location, and number of injections; optimal dilution of BoNT-A; specific headache types that respond best to BoNT-A; and long-term efficacy and safety. Data from ongoing well-designed trials that include a larger patient population investigating these issues may confirm a role for BoNT-A as a first-line agent for migraine prevention. Neurotoxin therapy is part of a broader headache management approach. Because the injection techniques for headache are unique and vary depending on the primary headache disorder being treated and the location and pattern of pain referral, the use of BoNT-A for headache is not simply an extension of its use for cosmesis. The use of BoNT-A in the overall management of primary headache disorders should be reserved for medical practitioners who not only have experience with BoNT-A injections, but possess the expertise in the diagnosis and management of complex headache disorders. Educating patients and addressing headache triggers and optimizing acute treatment improve the outcome of any preventive program.

Botulinum Toxins, Type A↗
PubMed2005

Medication overuse headache in patients with primary headache disorders: epidemiology, management and pathogenesis.

Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a common medical condition that is associated with considerable long-term morbidity and disability. Patients experiencing MOH have primary headache disorders (migraine, tension-type headache [TTH] or the combination of migraine and TTH) that change to a pattern of daily or near-daily headaches over a period of years or decades following the overuse of symptomatic headache medications. Overused drugs include analgesics, ergot alkaloids, serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists ('triptans') and medications containing barbiturates, codeine, caffeine, tranquillisers and mixed analgesics. Affected patients usually have a long history of primary headache, overuse of medications and MOH before they consult a physician for care. Patients with MOH are usually managed in specialist centres by withdrawal of the overused drugs and treatment of withdrawal symptoms (on an inpatient or outpatient basis), headache prophylaxis and limited use of symptomatic acute medications. Most patients respond to this therapy, although the prognosis is not always good and >or=50% may lapse over an initial 5-year follow-up period. The best practical strategy at present is to prevent the overuse of drugs in the first place by patient education and formal management approaches conducted in primary care to treat the primary headache before it changes to MOH. The quality of the clinical evidence on MOH is suboptimal and further biological and clinical research is urgently required to help facilitate the management of these patients more effectively in the future.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2004

Treatment of primary headache disorders with intravenous valproate: initial outpatient experience.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous valproate in managing moderate to severe headaches. BACKGROUND: Despite major strides in the understanding of primary headache disorders, there have been few additions to acute headache management other than introduction of the triptans. An intravenous antiepileptic preparation, sodium valproate, has been reported to be effective in the management of status epilepticus and acute headache. METHODS: Between March 13, 2000 and October 11, 2000, we prospectively treated, in a nonrandomized and open-label study, every patient with a moderate to severe headache (4 or greater on a visual analog scale of head pain from 1 to 10) who wanted treatment with intravenous valproate. Using a verbal visual analog scale for pain (0 = no headache and 10 = most severe headache), we measured head pain before treatment and at time of discharge. The treating nurse monitored vital signs and side effects. A positive response was defined as a 50% or greater reduction at discharge in baseline pain. Information was collected regarding patient demographics, type of headache (according to criteria of the International Headache Society and that recently proposed for chronic headache), observation time in the treatment suite, cumulative dose of valproate, and use of concurrent medications. Univariable and multivariable correlates of response to treatment were identified using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: One hundred thirty treatments were given to 89 women and 17 men, aged 17 to 76 years; 92 patients received only one treatment. Valproate doses ranged between 300 and 1200 mg. Thirty-three patients (31%) presented with episodic migraine, with or without aura; 45 patients (42%) presented with chronic daily headache with a history of episodic migraine, with or without aura (transformed migraine); 22 (21%) with unclassifiable chronic headache; 2 (2%) with episodic cluster headache; and 4 (4%) with chronic tension-type headache. For first treatments only, 61 patients (57.5%) responded to treatment, whereas for all treatments, 82 patients (63.1%) responded. Age and gender did not affect likelihood of response, whereas increasing duration of treatment (P=.003) and the additional use of analgesics (P=.021) were each negatively associated with response. Among headache types, unclassifiable chronic headache segregated from all other classified headaches in terms of poor response. Aside from rare dizziness (n = 2) and one spell interpreted as a pseudoseizure, no side effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous valproate is a safe, rapidly effective, abortive headache agent. It appears to be an effective analgesic for identifiable primary headaches, especially episodic headache, and less effective for unclassifiable chronic headache. Randomized, double-blind, controlled studies are warranted.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Classification and diagnostic criteria for primary headache disorders (Ad Hoc Committee IHS, 1988).

Clinical features and pathophysiological mechanisms of primary (idiopathic) headaches are revisited in the light of the new classification of headache, recently proposed by the Ad Hoc Committee of the International Headache Society. This computer-based classification is hierarchically constructed and offers operational diagnostic criteria for all headache disorders. However, further investigations are required in some cases (e.g. in case of tension-type headache) to better define the clinical form.

Cluster Headache↗
PubMed1997

Diagnosis of primary headache disorders. Validity of the International Headache Society criteria in clinical practice.

The classification and diagnostic criteria of the primary headaches--migraine, tension-type headache, and cluster headache--have been reviewed. Additional features of these conditions may enhance diagnostic accuracy. Modification of the classification and diagnostic criteria will take place as epidemiologic and pathophysiologic data continue to develop.

Cluster Headache↗
PubMed2003

Botulinum toxin type A as an effective prophylactic treatment in primary headache disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of botulinum toxin type A (Botox, Allergan, Inc, Irvine, CA) treatment in 271 patients diagnosed with headache in accordance with International Headache Society (IHS) criteria. BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin type A has shown promise for the treatment of headache in several clinical trials, but uncertainty remains as to how botulinum toxin type A optimally should be used for treating headache and which patients are best suited for this treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of all patients who received botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of headache from January 1999 to February 2002. Patients were injected with an average dose of 63.2 U (SD, 14.5) of botulinum toxin type A on 2 or more visits, with treatments involving a "fixed-site" or a "follow-the-pain" (or a combination of both) approach. In the fixed-site approach, botulinum toxin type A was injected into the procerus, corrugator, frontalis, and temporalis muscles. In the follow-the-pain approach, botulinum toxin type A was injected into a combination of the procerus, corrugator, frontalis, temporalis, occipitalis, trapezius, and/or semispinalis capitis muscles. The primary outcomes for the trial were the reduction in headache days per month or headache intensity (0 to 3 scale) (or both) from baseline. Patients were diagnosed according to IHS criteria and subsequently classified into the following categories: chronic daily headache (more than 15 headache days per month), episodic tension-type headache, episodic migraine, and "mixed" HA (less than 15 headache days per month, combination of migraine and tension-type headache). RESULTS: Treatment period was an average of 8.6 months (SD, 6.4); patients received an average of 3.4 doses (SD, 1.6) 3 months apart. Of the 271 patients, 29 (10.7%) had episodic migraine, 17 (6.3%) had episodic tension-type headache, 71 (26.2%) had mixed headache, and 154 (56.8%) had chronic daily headache. Two-hundred fifty-six patients had data for the number of headache days per month, 117 had data for headache intensity, and all 271 had data for headache days or headache intensity. Botulinum toxin type A treatment significantly reduced the number of headache days per month from 18.9 (SD, 10.3) to 8.3 (SD, 8.9) (n=256, P<.001)--a 56% reduction. Headache intensity decreased from 2.4 points (SD, 0.6) to 1.8 points (SD, 0.8) (n=117, P<.001)--a 25% reduction. Of 263 patients surveyed, 225 (85.6%) reported improvement in headache frequency and intensity. There was no correlation of effect/lack of effect with reason for treatment, duration/number of treatments, injection technique, mean/total dose, age, gender, or comorbidity. Approximately 95% of patients did not experience medication side effects. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that botulinum toxin type A may be an effective and safe prophylactic treatment for a variety of moderate to severe chronic headache types.

Blepharoptosis↗
PubMed1988

Neuroendocrine evaluation of central opiate activity in primary headache disorders.

The evaluation of central opiate activity could be of clinical value in the diagnosis and treatment of pain syndromes. The current approach via direct measurement of endogenous opioid peptides in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is not devoid of side effects and cannot be used in every-day practice. As an alternative to this method, we have studied the neuroendocrine response of plasma LH to an i.v. naloxone injection in 39 headache sufferers from different diagnostic subgroups, and in 12 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. Patients (19 females and 20 males) were affected by common migraine (CM, 11 cases), migraine with interparoxysmal headache (MIH, 9), classical migraine (CIM, 9), and chronic cluster headache (CH, 10). Headache lasted 3-36 years. Prior to naloxone challenge (4 mg i.v.), LH pulsatility was evaluated for 1 h. The next morning, the pituitary response to LH-RH (10 micrograms i.v.) was tested in 20 patients. Plasma LH was measured by RIA in every sample. The response to the tests was evaluated as secretion area of plasma LH minus the mean basal value. Controls (497.5 +/- 85.5 mIU/ml x 120 min), ClM (357.8 +/- 78.9) and CH (450.5 +/- 70.4) patients showed similar results, while in cases of CM (155.3 +/- 71.7, P less than 0.05) and MIH (104.1 +/- 53.7, P less than 0.01) the LH secretion after naloxone injection was significantly blunted. On the contrary, the response of LH to LH-RH was similar in controls and patient groups, thus excluding pituitary dysfunctions in this response.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of migraine and other primary headache disorders.

Botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A), a neurotoxin, is effective for treating a variety of disorders of involuntary muscle contraction, including cervical dystonia, blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm. It inhibits neurouscular signaling by blocking the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. The biological effects of the toxin are transient with normal neuronal signaling returning within approximately 3-6 months post injection. Recently, clinical findings suggest that BoNT/A may inhibit pain associated with migraine and other headache types. The mechanism by which this toxin inhibits pain is under investigation, recent findings suggest that it inhibits the release of neurotransmitters from nociceptive nerve terminals and in this way may exert an analgesic effect. A number of retrospective open-label chart reviews and three placebo-controlled double-blind trials have demonstrated that localized injections of BTX-A significantly reduce migraine frequency, severity, and migraine-associated disability. The majority of patients in these studies experienced no BoNT/A mediated side effects; however, a small percentage of patients did report transient minor side effects including blepharoptosis, dipolpia, and injection-site weakness. Currently there are several large-scale randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials in progress evaluating the efficacy, optimal dosing and side effect profile of this toxin as a novel treatment for migraine and other headache types. These studies may provide further evidence that BoNT/A is an effective option for the preventive treatment of migraine.

Botulinum Toxins, Type A↗
PubMed2001

Epidemiology and impact of primary headache disorders.

Migraine is a common disorder that remains largely undiagnosed and has a profound economic impact. In the future, better recognition and treatment can decrease costs and improve the lives of millions of Americans.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of migraine and other primary headache disorders: from bench to bedside.

Botulinum toxin type A, a neurotoxin, is effective for treating a variety of disorders of involuntary muscle contraction including cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, and hemifacial spasm. It inhibits neuromuscular signaling by blocking the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. The biological effects of the toxin are transient, with normal neuronal signaling returning within approximately 3 to 6 months postinjection. Recent clinical findings suggest that botulinum toxin type A may inhibit pain associated with migraine and other types of headache. However, the mechanism by which this toxin inhibits pain is not fully understood and is under investigation. Research findings suggest that botulinum toxin type A inhibits the release of neurotransmitters from nociceptive nerve terminals and, in this way, may possess an analgesic effect. A number of retrospective open-label chart reviews and 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated that localized injections of botulinum toxin type A significantly reduce the frequency, severity, and disability associated with migraine headaches. Although the majority of patients in these studies experienced no botulinum toxin type A-mediated side effects, a small percentage of patients did report transient minor side effects including blepharoptosis, diplopia, and injection-site weakness. Currently, 4 randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials are being conducted to evaluate the efficacy, optimal dosing, and side-effect profile of botulinum toxin type A as a novel treatment for migraine and other types of headache. These studies may provide further evidence that botulinum toxin type A is an effective option for the preventive treatment of migraine.

Analgesics, Non-Narcotic↗
PubMed1997

Neuroimaging in presumed primary headache disorders.

As routine outpatient neuroimaging became available more than 20 years ago, controversy arose over appropriate selection of patients for computed tomography studies and subsequently magnetic resonance imaging studies. Nowhere is this more apparent than in headache. Because headache is a truly ubiquitous condition with a lifetime prevalence rate reaching 90%, it is clear we cannot scan all patients with headache. Review of the pertinent literature, expert consensus, and a Practice Parameter issued by the American Academy of Neurology all suggest that routine neuroimaging is not necessary in patients with migraine headaches as defined by the International Headache Society criteria. The literature would also support the belief that imaging is not necessary in patients with typical recurrent cluster headaches. However, patients with new-onset headaches, headaches with a progressive course, headaches with a significant change in pattern, headaches that never alternate sides, and headaches associated with any neurologic findings or seizures have a substantially higher likelihood of a secondary cause such as tumor, arteriovenous malformation, or other structural lesion. In these situations, imaging must be considered as part of the workup. Unfortunately, the literature does not provide enough data to make any statistically predictive observations in patients with headaches other than migraine or cluster headache with symptoms but no findings on neurologic examination.

Arteriovenous Malformations↗