Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Hair Removal”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Recalcitrant scarring follicular disorders treated by laser-assisted hair removal: a preliminary report.

BACKGROUND: Recalcitrant scarring follicular disorders have been treated previously by removing hair follicles both surgically by scalp resection with skin grafting and with X-ray epilation. Laser-assisted hair removal may provide an alternate method of hair removal with less associated morbidity. OBJECTIVE: The goal is to determine whether laser-assisted hair removal can be used to treat follicular inflammatory disorders by destroying hair follicles. METHODS: Three patients with various scarring follicular disorders (dissecting cellulitis of the scalp, keratosis pilaris spinulosa decalvans, and pseudofolliculitis barbae) were treated with the long-pulse non-Q-switched ruby laser and followed clinically. RESULTS: The patients tolerated the treatments well without significant side effects and noted improvement of their condition along with decreased hair growth in the treated area. CONCLUSION: Laser-assisted hair removal may provide a safe, effective means of treating recalcitrant follicular disorders.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Hair removal in 40 hirsute women with an intense laser-like light source.

Until recently, previously applied methods to remove hair have ultimately proven ineffective or resulted in the formation of scars and small wounds. Different methods for removing hair in a more or less permanent way have been used: electrolysis, thermolysis and the blend method. In this study we describe the removal of hair without side-effects by means of non-laser incoherent emitted light, produced by the ILS flashlamp. In a multicenter study we treated 40 women with a median age of 38.6 years with hirsute hair growth of different hair colours on the upper lip and chin. In general 76.7% of the hair was removed within 6 treatments, with an average fluence of 38.7 J/cm2 and a mean wavelength of 585 nm per patient. A correlation was found between the percentage reduction of hairs and the number of treatments and between hair removal and needle epilation before treatment. Furthermore, a correlation was seen between hair reduction and wavelengths of 570 nm and 550 nm. No association was found between hair removal and clinical data of the patients, nor between hair reduction and technical data of the device. This study presents a new alternative for hair removal.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Laser hair removal: where are we now?

The hair removal market is evolving rapidly. The goal has always been long-term epilation. Success is dependent on understanding hair biology and physiology and on knowledge of laser physics, skin optics, and tissue preservation with respect to these emerging laser technologies. These topics will be reviewed, as will specific categories of laser systems in the hair removal arena and the clinical aspects of laser hair removal today.

Electrolysis↗
PubMed1999

Optical hair removal.

Traditional methods of hair removal have proven unsatisfactory for many individuals with excessive or unwanted hair. In the last few years, several lasers and xenon flashlamps have been developed that promise to fulfill the need for a practical, safe, and long-lasting method of hair removal. Aggressive marketing of these has contributed to their popularity among patients and physicians. However, significant controversy and confusion surrounds this field. This article provides a detailed explanation of the scientific underpinnings for optical hair removal and explores the advantages and disadvantages of the various devices currently available (Nd:YAG, ruby, alexandrite, diode lasers, and xenon flashlamp). Treatment and safety guidelines are provided to assist the practitioner in the use of these devices. Although the field of optical hair removal is still in its infancy, initial reports of long-term efficacy are encouraging.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Ruby laser-assisted hair removal reduces the coarseness of regrowing hairs: fallacy or fact?

There have been anecdotal reports that hairs that regrow after ruby laser-assisted hair removal are finer in appearance. If true, this phenomenon adds to the improved aesthetic effect of laser treatment of unwanted hair. It is the aim of this study to determine whether this phenomenon indeed occurs, and if so, assess its permanence and its mode of action. In this prospective clinical study, 71 patients with 94 treatment sites were treated with the Chromos 694 Depilation Ruby Laser. Hair diameter was measured pre-treatment, and at 3 and 7 months post-treatment. In addition, ex vivo scalp skin was used to assess if the ruby laser selectively damaged coarser hairs. Laser-treated and matched untreated skin samples were histologically assessed and the diameters of hair shafts (normal or obviously damaged) were measured. Results of this study were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between the hair diameter of non-lasered specimens and the hair diameter of the normal hair in lasered specimens. However, a statistically significant difference was seen between the hair diameter of non-lasered specimens and diameters of damaged hair in lasered specimens (P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between pre-treatment and 3 month hair diameters, but no statistically significant difference was found between pre-treatment and 7 month hair diameters. In conclusion, ruby laser-assisted hair removal results in a temporary reduction in hair diameter of regrowing hair. This is not due to the selective targeting of larger hair follicles.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Evaluation of the free-running ruby laser for hair removal. A retrospective study.

The free-running ruby laser has recently been introduced for removal of unwanted hair growth. It is assumed that the mode of action of ruby laser depilation is that of selective photothermolysis of the melanin-rich structures. The present data reflects our results of ruby treatment of 133 patients attending a dermatological laser clinic for hair removal. When success of the laser treatment was defined as greater than 50% hair removal, 59.0% of patients reported successful results after 90 or more days after last treatment. With success defined as greater than 25% hair removal at 90 days, successful treatment was obtained in 75.0%. Also, the patients evaluated the overall result of their treatments. The percentage of patients who were either "very satisfied" or "satisfied" after 90 days was 64.2%. Only a few side-effects were observed. In general, pain was no clinical problem. No significant scarring was observed. A temporary hypopigmentation was experienced by approximately 10%, but only one patient still had hypopigmentation 90 days after treatment. Due to variability of hair density as well as anagen and telogen phase durations in different anatomical locations, firm conclusions regarding the long-term effect still cannot be drawn.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Hair removal using the long-pulsed ruby laser.

There are a variety of traditional treatments for the removal of unwanted hair. Recently, lasers have been developed to remove hair. The long-pulsed ruby laser uses light at a wavelength of 694 nm with a 3-msec pulse to destroy hair. Seventy-two patients were treated with this laser from one to four times in a variety of areas. Seventy-one patients had an alteration in their hair growth. One patient had no change in her hair pattern. There were no scars and no permanent changes in pigmentation. Laser hair removal is a useful method for the treatment of unwanted facial and body hair.

Female↗
PubMed1999

Methods of hair removal.

The methods of hair removal vary between simple inexpensive means of home treatment (shaving, plucking, depilatories) to expensive and potentially time-consuming means used by paraprofessionals, nurses, and/or physicians (electrolysis, lasers, x-ray). The ways in which these different methods induce hair removal, the duration of such removal, and the nuances between devices within the same category of methods are discussed.

Hair↗
PubMed1999

Hair removal using the ruby laser: clinical efficacy in Fitzpatrick skin types I-V and histological changes in epidermal melanocytes.

The ruby laser is effective in removing unwanted body hair. The occurrence of cutaneous side-effects such as blistering, hypopigmentation and hyperpigmentation, however, remains problematic. These side-effects are more commonly seen in patients with dark coloured skin, which partly explains the relative scarcity of information on the efficacy of ruby laser hair removal in such patients. The mechanisms of the occurrence of these side-effects are also not known. It was the aim of this study to evaluate the efficacy of ruby laser-assisted hair removal in patients with Fitzpatrick skin type V in a retrospective clinical study and to evaluate the mechanism of post-treatment pigmentary change in a prospective clinical study. The percentage reduction in hair density in patients with skin type V was assessed after a variable period following treatment with the Chromos 694 Depilation Ruby Laser, and was compared with the results of those with skin types I-IV. To study the pigmentary change and melanocyte numbers after laser irradiation, ex-vivo scalp skin and serial patient biopsies were taken and stained with S-100, dopa oxidase and Masson-Fontana methods. Laser treatment reduced melanocyte numbers as measured by DOPA stain but not by S100. Laser treatment resulted in the clearance of pigment from the epidermis on histology. Ruby laser was shown to be effective in removing unwanted hair from patients with dark coloured skin, but with a higher incidence of cutaneous side-effects. The occurrence of hypopigmentation after laser irradiation was thought to be due to the suppression of melanogenesis in the epidermis rather than to destruction of the melanocytes.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1982

Preoperative hair removal: a random prospective study of shaving versus clipping.

We report the results of a random, prospective study of electrical clipping versus routine razor shaving in the removal of hair immediately before operation. Two hundred patients having elective inguinal herniorrhaphy according to strict protocol were included in this study. Unsatisfactory skin preparation, as evidenced by gross cuts made in the skin during hair removal, was noted in 7% of those shaved and 4% of those clipped. Two subcutaneous wound infections occurred in the shaved group (2%) and one in the clipped group (1%). This study indicates that preoperative clipping of hair with electric barber's clippers immediately before operation is a safe, well tolerated procedure that does not increase the risk of postoperative wound infection.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Hair removal using the long-pulsed ruby laser.

The long-pulsed ruby laser is a faster, more effective method for the removal of unwanted hair compared to older, temporary techniques like shaving, waxing, and chemical depilation. It is the only laser approved by the FDA for permanent hair removal. Patients experience minimal pain and side effects, observe immediate hair growth delay, an increase in vellus hairs, and have the potential for permanent hair removal. Although treatment sessions can be lengthy, the laser is easy to operate and the cooled handpiece allows patients to easily tolerate long sessions.

Hair Removal↗
PubMed1988

Scalp laceration repair without prior hair removal.

The effect on the infection rate of hair removal prior to scalp laceration repair has not been studied prospectively in the outpatient setting. Concern exists that not removing skin hair may lead to an increased incidence of serious wound infections. Sixty-eight scalp lacerations were repaired without hair removal and examined prospectively for infection. No infections were noted at 5-day follow-up. The mean patient age was 21.8 +/- 19.8 years, and the mean laceration length was 2.5 +/- 2.0 cm. The mean time from injury to repair of laceration was 2.2 +/- 2.8 hours. Sixty-three lacerations (92.7%) were repaired within 3 hours of injury. A prospective, randomized study in a select patient population to examine the effect of prior hair removal on infection rate is warranted.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Comparison of alexandrite laser and electrolysis for hair removal.

BACKGROUND: Different techniques have been used for hair removal. Electrolytic epilation is a widely accepted method for this purpose. Recently laser hair removal was introduced. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of long-pulse alexandrite laser hair removal with electrolytic epilation. METHODS: Twenty-four areas of unwanted axillar hair in 12 patients were included in the study. The right axillar area of the patients was treated by electrolysis with an intensity of 4-8 mA, and the left area was treated with long-pulse alexandrite laser with fluences between 30 and 50 J/cm2. Electrolysis was performed four times at 3-week intervals, and laser treatment was performed three times at 4-week intervals. Before each session, the hairs in a 4 cm2 area centered in the axilla were counted. The last evaluation was done 6 months after the initial treatment. The pain, time, and cost of each procedure are compared. RESULTS: The average clearance rate of the hairs was 74% by laser and 35% by electrolysis 6 months after the initial treatment. CONCLUSION: Alexandrite laser hair removal is a more reliable and practical solution than electrolysis. Laser hair removal is more expensive than electrolysis, but is 60 times faster and less painful than electrolysis; also fewer sessions are needed with the laser with better results.

Axilla↗
PubMed1999

Cranial procedures without hair removal

OBJECTIVE: In 1992, Winston published the first large series of patients undergoing cranial neurosurgery without hair removal (Winston KR: Hair and neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 31:320-329, 1992). Prompted by this report, the senior author began a prospective trial in 1992 of cranial neurosurgery without hair removal. METHODS: All patients undergoing elective cranial surgery were offered the opportunity to undergo surgery without hair removal. The protocol advocated by Winston was strictly followed in the first 100 patients but has subsequently been modified. Patients having only cranial procedures have their head prepared for 10 minutes with chlorhexidine and water followed by an isopropyl alcohol rinse. Patients having craniofacial procedures are prepared with iodophor. A single perioperative dose of prophylactic antibiotic is administered. RESULTS: We have performed 346 cranial operations without hair removal. These include craniotomy for tumor, trauma, and aneurysm (n = 115); epilepsy procedures, including depth, subdural strip, and grid electrode placement, lobectomy, and callosotomy (n = 95); functional procedures, including thalamotomy, pallidotomy, capsulotomy, and stereotactic biopsy (n = 84); ventriculoperitoneal shunts (n = 8); brain abscess aspiration or resection (n = 5); and miscellaneous other procedures (n = 10). Twenty-nine patients underwent cranial base procedures in conjunction with an otolaryngologist and had the alternate preparation. There have been no infections and no other complications associated with not removing hair. CONCLUSION: Cranial surgery without hair removal is safe and is not associated with a discernible increased risk of infection. There are simple techniques for keeping hair out of the wound. Patients are highly desirous of keeping their hair and react very positively to this option. We advocate a greater practice of this technique in neurosurgery.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1977

Preoperative hair removal.

This study compares the efficiency, safety and cost of hair removal before surgery, with a safety razor, an electric clipper and a depilatory. It was found that both the razor and the clipper damaged the surface of the skin, while the depilatory caused a mild lymphocytic reaction in the upper dermis. The depilatory was expensive and may cause sensitivity reactions in a few individuals, but was found to be the easiest and most efficient method of removing hair. It was concluded that if hair has to be removed a depilatory is the agent of choice.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗
PubMed2000

Mathematical modeling for the prediction and optimization of laser hair removal.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The study of hair removal is a slow, tedious process. Efficacy evaluations require test-site observation for at least one complete hair cycle, a minimum of 6-8 months. In addition, tracking and counting individual hairs is extremely labor intensive. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a mathematical model for hair removal that could significantly speed the entire process. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Generally accepted kinetic and statistical modeling methods were used to develop a mathematical description of hair growth. The anagen and telogen percentages and decay times were the variables used to predict the kinetics of untreated hair. In the case that the follicles were treated, it was necessary to additionally consider the possible outcomes after treatment, making the calculations much too complicated for simple mathematical formulations. Therefore, a computerized statistical model was developed that considered the probabilities of no, partial, or complete follicular damage in addition to the untreated model variables. These models were then evaluated by comparing them to data derived from the literature and a study center. RESULTS: Values derived from the mathematical model were capable of closely approximating the experimental results of untreated (shaving) and treated (plucking, electrolysis, ruby laser, Q-switched Nd:YAG laser) hair growth kinetics. The model was also shown to be useful for optimizing the number and interval of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatments. CONCLUSIONS: A mathematical model can be used to reliably predict results from a variety of hair removal techniques. It also appears to be useful for optimizing a particular treatment protocol. In addition, the development of new hair removal products may be aided by using this method.

Computer Simulation↗
PubMed1999

A comparison of the long-pulse and short-pulse Alexandrite laser hair removal systems.

Laser-assisted hair removal has been reported previously with the Nd:YAG laser, the long-pulse ruby laser, the long-pulse Alexandrite laser, and the short-pulse Alexandrite laser. Results with all these lasers have been successful; however, it has been postulated that the long-pulse Alexandrite laser would have a lower complication rate and greater efficacy at identical fluences than the short-pulse Alexandrite laser. The authors chose to compare directly the pulsed Alexandrite lasers for speed of application, complications, and results. Eighteen patients who desired hair removal were entered into the study. There were 10 female and 8 male patients, with a mean age of 36 years. All skin types from Fitzpatrick classes I through VI were treated. The body areas treated consisted of the face, ears, neck, back, arms, upper thighs, bikini lines, legs, and breasts. One side of the body was treated with the short-pulse (2-msec) Alexandrite laser (Sharplan Epitouch 5100). The other half was treated with a long-pulse (20-msec) Alexandrite laser. Both lasers were set at the same fluence for each patient. Patients reported a 60% to 80% reduction in hair growth at 6 months. Both sides were identical with regard to return of hair growth and complications such as hypopigmentation. Both the long- and short-pulse Alexandrite laser systems yielded an effective method of hair reduction with minimal complications. Equal results and complications were obtained with the two systems. The only exception was that the length of the procedure was shorter with the short-pulse Alexandrite laser.

Adult↗