Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “HYSTERIA, CONVERSION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Conversion hysteria.

Conversion hysteria differs from hysteria in that it arises suddenly, rather than being a lifelong disorder. It is monosymptomatic rather than polysymptomatic, and is seen in men almost as frequently as in women. La belle indifférence, when present, is a useful clue to diagnosis. Other clues are ambiguity in reporting of the symptoms, medically inconsistent symptoms and hysterical personality features. Treatment may include removing the patient from a stressful environment and removing the "payoff" yielded by the illness. A confrontation with the patient is generally to be avoided.

Affect↗

[Conversion hysteria].

Conversion disorder is characterized by symptoms or deficits affecting voluntary motor or sensory function that suggest a neurological condition. The symptoms or deficits are related to psychological factors but not intentionally produced or feigned. They could be associated with true neurological disorders and their diagnosis is difficult. Neurologically they do not conform to known neurological mechanisms but instead follow the individual conceptualization of a condition and vary according to attention and emotions. Psychologically they are related to a psychic conflict or a stressful event. They could be associated to other manifestations of the hysterical neurosis or various mental conditions.

Conversion Disorder↗

Hypnosis and conversion hysteria: a unifying model.

There are many similarities between the symptoms of conversion hysteria and phenomena produced in hypnotic contexts. This paper reviews some of those similarities and considers more general features associated with both hypnotic phenomena and conversion hysteria symptoms such as lack of concern, perceived involuntariness, the display of ''implicit knowledge'' and their apparently compliant nature. Neurophysiological and brain-imaging studies of hypnotically produced effects and conversion symptoms are described, which implicate frontal cortical structures in moderating the respective changes elsewhere in the brain, particularly in cingulate cortex. A recurrent theme is the apparent paradox which exists between, on the one hand, the subjective reality and involuntariness of both hypnotic phenomena and the symptoms of conversion hysteria and, on the other, the fact that objectively they appear to be role-congruent enactments responsive to the manipulation of motivational factors, expectancy, and social influence. A model of consciousness and self-awareness is presented which attempts to resolve that paradox whilst describing similar mechanisms underlying hypnotic phenomena and conversion hysteria symptoms. The model develops the idea of a central executive structure, similar to the notion of a supervisory attentional system, acting outside self-awareness but at a late stage of information processing which can be directly influenced from both internal and external sources to produce the relevant phenomena. The paper ends by proposing that as conversion disorder, pain disorder, and the dissociation disorders appear to be linked by a common mechanism they should be classified together under the heading of auto-suggestive disorder.

Journal Article↗

Conversion hysteria: is it a viable concept?

The notion of conversion hysteria is built around three assumptions to the effect that symptoms can arise without an adequate pathological base, that the patient experiences these symptoms as ''real'' in that they are not consciously feigned, and that psychological distress can be transformed or ''converted'' into physical symptoms. It is argued that the first of these assumptions is valid and that the truth of the second cannot be judged with adequate reliability to make it acceptable as a criterion for classification. The last assumption is questionable in that it is difficult to conceive of a satisfactory explanation as to how the process of conversion might operate.

Journal Article↗

Cognitive performance in conversion hysteria.

In order to test some neurobiologically based assumptions pertaining to attention and memory dysfunction in conversion hysteria, a series of tasks was given to 17 hospitalized patients with hysterical conversion reaction and to a control group of nonpsychotic patients under conditions of nonstress and stress. The results indicated significant differences in performance between hysteria and control subjects. The former group, in comparison to controls, had heightened suggestibility, greater field dependency, and greater impairment of recent memory and vigilance-attention. A discriminant analysis indicated the feasibility of using such tests as objective diagnostic criteria for hysteria.

Adult↗

The electrodiagnostic examination with hysteria-conversion reaction and malingering.

Electrodiagnostic examination (EDX) can be helpful in assessing patients with hysteria-conversion reaction (H-CR) and malingering. The EDX with both H-CR and malingering are identical, but the electromyographer usually distinguishes one from another based on how the patient responds to the situation. EDX not only can demonstrate that symptoms are probably nonorganic in nature, but also can show that symptoms attributed clinically to H-CR and malingering actually have an organic basis.

Conversion Disorder↗

Imaging hypnotic paralysis: implications for conversion hysteria.

In a single case study with positron emission tomography (PET) functional imaging, hypnotic paralysis activated similar brain areas to those in conversion hysteria, supporting the view that hypnosis and hysteria might share common neurophysiological mechanisms.

Adult↗

[Post-traumatic conversion hysteria. A case report of hysterical paraplegia (author's transl)].

The authors report a case of hysterical paraplegia occurring two days after a craniovertebral trauma. They describe the patient's evolution on psychological, neurological and physical therapy grounds. They also discuss the concept of traumatic neurosis with regard to definition, characteristics, classification and its boundaries in relation to the subjective central post-traumatic syndrome. They also study the definition, frequency, limits and course of conversion hysteria with special emphasis on hysterical paralysis and its characteristics.

Adult↗