Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “HYDROXYZINE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients: an investigation of chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine pamoate, and meperidine vs. chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine pamoate.

This study evaluated two oral sedative regimens for the conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients (mean age 37.0 months) unmanageable by traditional behavior management techniques. Regimen A included chloral hydrate (Noctec--E.R. Squibb and Sons, Princeton, NJ) at 50 mg/kg with 25 mg hydroxyzine pamoate (Vistaril--Pfizer Laboratories, New York, NY), plus meperidine (Demerol--Winthrop-Breon, New York, NY) at 1.5 mg/kg. Regimen B included chloral hydrate at 50 mg/kg with 25 mg hydroxyzine pamoate. In a crossover research design, 10 patients were assigned randomly to receive one regimen, to be followed by the alternative regimen during the second appointment. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if meperidine would improve patient behavior, and increase the prevalence of respiratory compromise. A secondary purpose of the study was to develop an objective method to assess behavior during the conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients. Results revealed that the addition of oral meperidine to chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine pamoate resulted in improved behavior (P less than 0.01) during local anesthetic injection, rubber dam delivery, and the operative dental procedure. There was no increase in the prevalence of respiratory compromise with the addition of meperidine.

Anesthesia, Dental↗
PubMed1987

The effect of chronic administration of hydroxyzine on hydroxyzine pharmacokinetics in dogs.

Subsensitivity to H1-receptor antagonists has been attributed to autoinduction of enzyme systems and increased clearance rates during chronic drug administration. We studied the changes in serum half-life values and clearance rates in dogs who were administered hydroxyzine, 0.7 mg/kg, intramuscularly, daily, for 150 days. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on the first day of drug administration, and on days 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150. The mean serum half-life value on day 30, 60, and 120 was significantly longer (p less than 0.05) than that of 2.4 +/- 0.3 hours obtained on day 1. The mean clearance values obtained on days 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 were significantly slower (p less than 0.05) than the value of 25.12 +/- 4.13 ml/min/kg obtained on day 1 but were not significantly different from each other. Mean serum hydroxyzine concentrations were often significantly higher on the later study days than on day 1. The mean apparent volume of distribution values obtained on days 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 did not differ significantly from the value of 5.0 +/- 1.5 L/kg obtained on day 1. This study adds to the mounting evidence that subsensitivity to the effects of an H1-receptor antagonist is not due to autoinduction of enzyme systems, more rapid clearance of the drug, and lower concentrations of the drug in serum and tissue.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Double-blind, multicenter trial to compare the efficacy of intramuscular dihydroergotamine plus hydroxyzine versus intramuscular meperidine plus hydroxyzine for the emergency department treatment of acute migraine headache.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate intramuscular dihydroergotamine in direct comparison with opioid analgesia in the treatment of acute migraine headache. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind trial performed in the emergency departments of 11 general hospitals in the United States. One hundred seventy-one patients between the ages of 18 and 60 years who presented to the ED with acute migraine headache were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1 mg dihydroergotamine (DHE) or 1.5 mg/kg meperidine (MEP) by intramuscular injection. The anti-nauseant hydroxyzine (H) was coadministered in both treatment groups. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-six patients were evaluable. Treatment groups were comparable in sample size, demographics, and baseline measurements of headache pain. Reduction of headache pain as measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale was 41+/-33 mm (53.5% reduction) for the DHE group, and 45+/-30 mm (55.7% reduction) for the MEP group at 60 minutes after treatment (difference=2.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -10%, 14.5%; P=.81). Reduction in the severity of nausea and improvement in functional ability were similar between treatment groups. Central nervous system adverse events were less common in the DHE group (DHE 23.5% versus MEP 37.6%, difference-14.1%: 95% CI -28%, 0%). In particular, dizziness was reported less commonly with DHE than MEP (2% versus 15%, difference=-13%: 95% CI -21%, -5%). CONCLUSION: In this prospective, double-blind trial of a convenience sample of ED patients randomly assigned to one of two treatment regimens, DHE and MEP were comparable therapies for acute migraine. The use of DHE avoids several problems associated with opioid analgesia, including dizziness.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

A prospective study of 2 sedation regimens in children: chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine versus midazolam, meperidine, and hydroxyzine.

The aim of this study was to compare both the behavioral and physiological effects of 2 drug regimens in children: chloral hydrate (CH), meperidine (M), and hydroxyzine (H) (regimen A) versus midazolam (MZ), M, and H (regimen B). Patients between 24 and 54 months of age were examined by crossover study design. Behavior was analyzed objectively by the North Carolina Behavior Rating System and subjectively through an operator and monitor success scale. Physiological data were recorded every 5 minutes and at critical points throughout the appointment. Sixteen patients completed this study. No significant differences in behavior were noted by the North Carolina Behavior Rating System or the operator and monitor success scale. A quiet or annoyed behavior was observed 93% and 90% of the time for regimen A and regimen B, respectively. Using the operator and monitor success scale, 63% of regimen A and 56% of regimen B sedations were successful. No statistically significant differences were noted in any of the physiological parameters between the 2 regimens. Ten episodes of hemoglobin desaturation were detected with regimen A sedations. There were no differences between the sedative drug regimens CH/M/H and MZ/M/H for behavioral outcomes or physiological parameters.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Comparison of 6 different methods for lorazepam withdrawal. A controlled study, hydroxyzine versus placebo].

PATIENTS AND METHODS: 154 outpatients with generalized anxiety (DSM III-R criteria), followed by general practitioners, gave an informed written consent to participate in this multicenter, randomized, placebo controlled study previously approved by a legal ethic committee (CCPPRB). The patients had to be long term consumers (at least 3 months) of 2 mg daily of lorazepam and were withdrawn using transiently an antihistaminic anxiolytic (hydroxyzine or placebo TAD) according to 6 different procedures defining 6 parallel groups: hydroxyzine 50 mg, abrupt or progressive withdrawal; hydroxyzine 25 mg, abrupt or progressive withdrawal; placebo, abrupt or progressive withdrawal. Following this 4 week-period of withdrawal, the patients were without any treatment for a post-study follow up 2 month-period. Clinical evaluations for anxiety (HARS, Zung), sleep (Spiegel), BZD withdrawal syndrome (Tyrer), adverse reactions and clinical global impression (CGI) were performed at D0, D7, D14, D28, D35 and D88. Investigators opinion and patients attitude towards BZD were collected at D88. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Analysis of variance for quantitative variables and chi square test for qualitative or ordinal variables. RESULTS: Whatever abrupt or progressive, with or without hydroxyzine support, using half or full dosage, lorazepam withdrawal proved to be feasible even after a long term BZD treatment (mean = 64 months +/- 60). GPs opinion (72% satisfied: D35; 78% satisfied: D88) is satisfying but patients attitude (at D88: 54% patients desired to be regiven a tranquilizer, 31% patients occasionally had a BZD and 22% formally demanded a prescription of BZD) is more questionable. Despite a high initial level of anxiety under lorazepam (HARS = 21 +/- 10 at D0), after a one-month period of withdrawal (under placebo or hydroxyzine) followed by a 2 month-period without any treatment, 75% patients were totally free of any drug and their level of anxiety was significantly decreased (D88: HARS = 12 +/- 9). Progressive withdrawal appeared preferable if compared to abrupt since the number of drop outs between D28 and D88 was less important and the procedure judged more favourably by the patients. Levels of anxiety significantly decreased in both the groups (progressive and abrupt) but sleep parameters and number of withdrawal symptoms between D7 and D28 were improved only in abrupt withdrawal group (p < 0.0001). Considering hydroxyzine, 2 patients dropped out between D0 and D28 in the group hydroxyzine 25 mg, 6 patients in the group 50 mg and 5 patients in the group placebo. Levels of anxiety (HARS et Zung) were significantly improved in hydroxyzine 50 mg group (p < 0.007) and in hydroxyzine 25 mg group (p < 0.012) but not in placebo group. Withdrawal symptoms (Tyrer) between D0 and D28 were improved only in hydroxyzine 50 mg group and the number of side effects was significantly improved in both the hydroxyzine (25 et 50 mg) groups but not in placebo group. However, no significant difference was found between the 3 groups. Daytime sleepiness is more frequent in hydroxyzine 50 mg group. DISCUSSION: These results proved a significant improvement of anxiety, a decrease of side effects in both the groups treated with hydroxyzine and a reduction of withdrawal symptomatology in hydroxyzine 50 mg group. When a patient is engaged to be withdrawn from of a lorazepam long term treatment, it can therefore be proposed as a support a transient prescription of hydroxyzine 25 mg TAD to markedly anxious patients and of hydroxyzine 50 mg TAD to patients presenting a withdrawal symptomatology.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Hydroxyzine from topical phospholipid liposomal formulations: evaluation of peripheral antihistaminic activity and systemic absorption in a rabbit model.

Hydroxyzine, an effective but sedating H1-antihistamine is given orally to treat allergic skin disorders. This study was performed to assess the peripheral H(1)-antihistaminic activity and extent of systemic absorption of hydroxyzine from liposomes applied to the skin. Using L-alpha-phosphatidylcholine (PC), small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) and multilamellar vesicles (MLVs) containing hydroxyzine were prepared. Hydroxyzine in Glaxal Base (GB) was used as the control. Using a randomized, crossover design, each formulation, containing 10 mg of hydroxyzine, was applied to the shaved backs of 6 rabbits (3.08 +/- 0.05 kg). Histamine-induced wheal tests and blood sampling were performed at designated time intervals up to 24 hours. Compared with baseline, hydroxyzine from all formulations significantly suppressed histamine-induced wheal formation by 75% to 95% for up to 24 hours. Mean maximum suppression, 85% to 94%, occurred from 2 to 6 hours, with no differences among the formulations. The areas of plasma hydroxyzine concentration versus time area under the curve (AUCs) from PC-SUV and PC-MLV, 80.1 +/- 20.8 and 78.4 +/- 33.9 ng/mL/h, respectively, were lower than that from GB, 492 +/- 141 ng/mL/h (P < or =.05) over 24 hours. Plasma concentrations of cetirizine arising in-vivo as the active metabolite of hydroxyzine, from PC-SUV, PC-MLV, and GB, were similar with AUCs of 765 +/- 50, 1035 +/- 202, and 957 +/- 227 ng/mL/h, respectively (P < or =.05). Only 0.02% to 0.06% of the initial hydroxyzine dose remained on the skin after 24 hours. In this model, hydroxyzine from SUV and MLV had excellent topical H1-antihistaminic activity, and minimal systemic exposure occurred. Cetirizine formed in-vivo contributed to some of H1-antihistaminic activity.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Prospective controlled study of hydroxyzine and cetirizine in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Hydroxyzine has been used for many years for the treatment of allergic symptoms. Cetirizine, an active metabolite of hydroxyzine, has become very popular for the treatment of allergy symptoms because of its efficacy without the sedating effects of the parent compound. Little is known about the safety of hydroxyzine use during pregnancy, and there are no published reports on the effects of cetirizine on pregnancy outcome. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hydroxyzine and cetirizine are associated with any increased risk of malformations in humans. METHODS: All pregnant women counseled by the Motherisk Program in Toronto on the use of hydroxyzine or cetirizine during their pregnancies were enrolled in a prospective, controlled, observational study. The control group consisted of pregnant women matched for age, smoking, and alcohol consumption who were counseled for non-teratogenic drug. RESULTS: One hundred twenty women were followed after exposure to either hydroxyzine or cetirizine during pregnancy. Of these, 53 were exposed to hydroxyzine during organogenesis and 39 to cetirizine. There were no significant differences found between the hydroxyzine or cetirizine groups and the control groups in the pregnancy outcome: rate of livebirths, spontaneous or therapeutic abortion, or stillbirth. There was also no difference in the rates of major or minor anomalies, mean birth weight, mode of delivery, gestational age, or presence of neonatal distress. CONCLUSIONS: The use of hydroxyzine and cetirizine does not appear to be associated with increased teratogenic risk.

Abortion, Spontaneous↗
PubMed1996

Cetirizine versus hydroxyzine and placebo in chronic idiopathic urticaria.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of cetirizine with that of hydroxyzine and placebo in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. DESIGN: A 4-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled safety and efficacy study. SETTING: Patients were treated in a variety of allergy practice settings. PATIENTS: The study population consisted of 188 patients who were at least 12 years of age, with symptomatic chronic idiopathic urticaria that had occurred episodically for at least 6 weeks. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were given either cetirizine 10 mg once daily, hydroxyzine 25 mg tid, or placebo for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients and investigators used a 4-point scale to evaluate symptoms of urticaria and adverse effects of treatment. Ratings were compared among those taking cetirizine, hydroxyzine, or placebo. RESULTS: After 1 day of treatment, patients randomized to receive cetirizine 10 mg/d exhibited a reduction in the number of episodes of urticaria (and a reduction in pruritus) compared with patients who received hydroxyzine 25 mg tid and patients who received placebo (p = 0.002). The number of urticarial episodes in patients treated with hydroxyzine did not reach significance until day 2 (p = 0.001). Compared with patients who received placebo, patients who received cetirizine and those who received hydroxyzine showed reductions during weeks 1, 2, and 3 and at end-point analysis in the number and size of lesions and in the severity of pruritus (p < 0.04). Patient and physician evaluations at the end of week 4 revealed an improvement in urticarial symptoms for the hydroxyzine and cetirizine groups compared with the placebo group (p < 0.001). Four patients in the hydroxyzine group, 1 patient in the cetirizine group, and 1 patient in the placebo group discontinued the study because of sedation. No patient withdrew because of lack of efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Cetirizine 10 mg once daily was equivalent to hydroxyzine 25 mg tid in controlling the symptoms of patients with chronic urticaria, as assessed by patient and investigator evaluations.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Objective antihistamine side effects are mitigated by evening dosing of hydroxyzine.

First-generation antihistamines have potency, pharmacokinetic, and cost advantages compared with nonsedating second-generation antihistamines. Bedtime dosing of hydroxyzine was investigated as a dosing strategy to minimize reaction time degradation and adverse subjective symptoms previously documented for hydroxyzine in divided doses. Hydroxyzine, 50 mg qhs, was compared with terfenadine, 60 mg bid, in this double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of 15 healthy, asymptomatic adults. Computer-based eye-hand reaction time tests of simple reaction time (SRT) and choice reaction time (CRT) were not statistically different among the three drugs. Drowsiness, dry mouth, and irritability were significant for hydroxyzine (P = .0001, .001 and .02, respectively) compared with terfenadine or placebo, but less than seen in a previous study of hydroxyzine, 25 mg bid. Symptom scores with terfenadine were comparable to placebo. Histamine skin test wheal and flare were both significantly and comparably suppressed by hydroxyzine and terfenadine (P = .0001). While wheal suppression by hydroxyzine was universal, four of the 15 subjects showed little or no suppression with terfenadine (P = .03). Although bedtime dosing of hydroxyzine did not eliminate subjective symptoms, it maintained skin H1-receptor antagonism the following morning and alleviated the prolongation of reaction times previously reported with hydroxyzine in divided doses. The significant adverse subjective symptoms and psychomotor performance degradations caused by first-generation antihistamines can be mitigated by creative dosing schedules.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

Effect of the H2-antagonist cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the H1-antagonists hydroxyzine and cetirizine in patients with chronic urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant administration of an H1-receptor antagonist with an H2-receptor antagonist may enhance the wheal and flare suppression produced by the H1-antagonist. This synergism may be due, at least in part, to a pharmacokinetic effect. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in 16 patients with chronic urticaria, we investigated the pharmacokinetics and suppressive effect on the histamine-induced wheal and flare of a single dose of hydroxyzine 25 mg or cetirizine 10 mg, given before and after treatment with cimetidine 600 mg every 12 hours for 10 days. RESULTS: When hydroxyzine was administered with cimetidine, the partial hydroxyzine area under the curve increased significantly (p < 0.05) to 303 +/- 92 ng/ml/hr from 227 +/- 77 ng/ml/hr after administration of hydroxyzine alone, and the concentration of cetirizine arising from hydroxyzine was lower. When hydroxyzine was given with cimetidine, wheal and flare suppression increased compared with when hydrozyzine was given alone, but the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). When cetirizine was administered with cimetidine, the pharmacokinetics of cetirizine did not change significantly, and no enhancement of wheal and flare suppression was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this study co-administration of hydroxyzine with cimetidine resulted in significantly increased serum hydroxyzine concentrations and increased wheal and flare suppression, thus confirming the rationale for a trial of concomitant administration of these medications in some patients with chronic urticaria unresponsive to treatment with an H1-antagonist alone. We found no therapeutic rationale for co-administration of cetirizine with cimetidine in urticaria treatment. These medications may be co-administered safely without fear of medication interaction.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Effect of the H2-receptor antagonist cimetidine, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the H1-receptor antagonists hydroxyzine and cetirizine in rabbits.

The effects of coadministration of the H2-receptor antagonist cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the H1-receptor antagonists hydroxyzine and cetirizine were studied in rabbits. A single dose of hydroxyzine, 10 mg (Experiment A), or cetirizine, 10 mg (Experiment B), was given intravenously on three occasions: 2 weeks before cimetidine administration, after cimetidine, 100 mg/kg, had been given every 12 hr for 1 week, and 2 weeks after the cimetidine was discontinued. Serum concentrations of hydroxyzine and cetirizine, the active metabolite of hydroxyzine arising in vivo (Experiment A), or cetirizine (Experiment B) were measured by HPLC. The pharmacologic effects of hydroxyzine and cetirizine were monitored by measuring the suppression of histamine-induced wheals, using an IBM-PC and digitizer. The hydroxyzine and cetirizine half-life and AUC0-->infinity values were significantly increased and the systemic clearance rates were significantly decreased in the presence of cimetidine. Similar results were obtained when cetirizine was administered de novo. Wheal suppression produced by hydroxyzine or cetirizine was increased and prolonged in the presence of cimetidine. The synergism observed between hydroxyzine or cetirizine and cimetidine in suppression of the histamine-induced cutaneous response may be due to a pharmacokinetic interaction.

Alanine Transaminase↗
PubMed2006

False-positive serum tricyclic antidepressant concentrations using fluorescence polarization immunoassay due to the presence of hydroxyzine and cetirizine.

A recent report indicates that hydroxyzine and its active metabolite cetirizine interfere with the PENTINA carbamazepine assay. The potential interference of hydroxyzine and cetirizine with the fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and CEDIA assay of carbamazepine as well as with the fluorescence polarization immunoassay of tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) was studied. Aliquots of drug-free serum pools were supplemented with various concentrations of hydroxyzine and cetirizine representing therapeutic, mild to moderate toxic as well as very toxic concentrations. Then apparent carbamazepine and TCA concentrations were measured by immunoassays. Although no interference of hydroxyzine and cetirizine was observed with carbamazepine assays (FPIA and CEDIA), significant apparent TCA concentrations were observed when aliquots of drug-free serum were supplemented with hydroxyzine or cetirizine. Mathematical formula was devised to predict hydroxyzine and/or cetirizine concentration in serum based on observed apparent TCA levels. Hydroxyzine and cetirizine also falsely increased total TCA values when aliquots of serum pool prepared from patients receiving TCA were further supplemented with these drugs. In conclusion, hydroxyzine and cetirizine do not interfere with the FPIA and CEDIA carbamazepine assays but interfere with the measurement of total TCA using the FPIA.

Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic↗
PubMed1983

Analgesic efficacy and pharmacokinetic evaluation of meperidine and hydroxyzine, alone and in combination.

As part of a study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of meperidine and hydroxyzine, alone and in combination, a double-blind complete crossover study of meperidine (50 mg IM), hydroxyzine (100 mg IM), meperidine (50 mg IM) plus hydroxyzine (100 mg IM), and saline placebo was conducted. Thirty patients with chronic moderate to severe pain due to metastatic cancer were evaluated as to pain relief following administration of all four study medications. All of the treatment groups showed statistically significant analgesic activity as compared to placebo. Hydroxyzine provided sustained pain relief to six hours, whereas meperidine produced analgesia up to two hours. The combination produced additive analgesia only during the first 2 hr. The pharmacokinetics of meperidine and hydroxyzine were compared to observed analgesia. Significant correlation between serum drug levels of meperidine and hydroxyzine and pain relief resulted and the serum levels of meperidine and hydroxyzine necessary for analgesia were calculated to be 0.10-0.15 mg/ml and 60-70 ng/ml; respectively. The observed analgesia of the meperidine/hydroxyzine combination was correlated with the analgesia of the individual agents and the limited additive analgesia observed with the addition of meperidine to hydroxyzine does not justify the added toxicity of the narcotic.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Value of hydroxyzine in generalized anxiety disorder: controlled double-blind study versus placebo].

A multi-centre study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of hydroxyzine in the treatment of patients presenting a generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). One hundred and thirty three patients, suffering from a GAD (according to DSM III-R criteria with 6 months duration criteria), were enrolled in a randomised, double-blind, hydroxyzine (50 mg/day) versus placebo, over a 4-week trial period. By the end of the first week, the decrease of anxiety scores was significant for the hydroxyzine group, as compared to placebo (in respect of all rating criteria of anxiety). The statistical superiority for hydroxyzine continued to the end of the 4-weeks study period, and persisted at a further evaluation a week after abrupt discontinuation of active treatment. The tolerance evaluation showed that side effects were reported in 52% of hydroxyzine group versus 35% of placebo group. The most commun side effects were sleepiness (28% vs 14% with placebo), weight gain (12% vs 10%), dry mouth (14% vs 5%), loss of concentration (9% vs 8%) and insomnia (9% vs 6%). Sleepiness in the hydroxyzine group appeared during the first week and progressively disappeared later during treatment. We concluded that hydroxyzine at 50 mg/day produces a statistically and clinically significant anxiolytic effect, commencing during the first week of treatment and maintained throughout the 4-week period and after abrupt discontinuation without rebound of anxiety or withdrawal symptoms. The most commun side effect with hydroxyzine is transient sleepiness.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of hydroxyzine in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

Hydroxyzine, a potent H1-receptor antagonist often used for relief of pruritus in patients with hepatic dysfunction, was studied in eight patients, mean age 53.4 +/- SD 11.2 years, with primary biliary cirrhosis. The patients ingested a single dose of hydroxyzine, 0.7 mg/kg (mean dose 43.9 +/- 6.6 mg). Before the dose, then hourly for 6 hours, every 2 hours from 6-12 hours, at 24 hours, and every 24 hours for 6 days, serum hydroxyzine and cetirizine were measured and an intradermal injection of 0.01 mL of a 0.1 mg/mL solution of histamine phosphate was performed. Wheals and flares were traced at 10 minutes and the areas were calculated. Mean peak hydroxyzine levels of 116.5 +/- 60.6 ng/mL occurred at 2.3 +/- 0.7 hours and mean peak cetirizine levels of 500.4 +/- 302.0 ng/mL occurred at 4.8 +/- 2.8 hours. The mean serum elimination half-life of hydroxyzine was 36.6 +/- 13.1 hours, and the mean serum elimination half-life of cetirizine was 25.0 +/- 8.2 hours. The mean hydroxyzine clearance rate was 8.65 +/- 7.46 mL/min/kg, and the mean volume of distribution was 22.7 +/- 13.3 L/kg. The mean wheal area was suppressed (P less than 0.01) from 1 to 120 hours, with maximal suppression from 2 to 48 hours. The mean flare area was suppressed from 1 to 144 hours, with maximal suppression from 3 to 24 hours (P less than 0.01). All patients became sleepy from 0.5 to 6 hours. Blurred vision, dizziness and dry mouth each occurred in two patients. Hydroxyzine elimination is impaired in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Comparison between alprazolam and hydroxyzine for oral premedication.

The safety and efficacy of alprazolam and hydroxyzine administered orally as surgical premedicants were compared in a double-blind controlled study. Sixty-five patients were given either alprazolam 1 mg or hydroxyzine 75 mg, one to two hours before surgery. Anxiety was assessed by both the patient and the anaesthetist, the patient using a visual analogue scale, the anaesthetist employing both analogue and ordinal ratings. Sedation was assessed by the anaesthetist only, using the same two methods. Amnesia was appraised with a simple memory test. Safety was assessed by recording adverse effects and measuring haemodynamic variables. Premedication with alprazolam produced a modest reduction in anxiety (28%) (P < 0.01) while hydroxyzine had no detectable effect. The comparison of the sedation level and of the memory test revealed no difference between the two premedicants. Minor side effects were only observed in the hydroxyzine group. Changes in blood pressure were more pronounced in the hydroxyzine group. This study shows that alprazolam and hydroxyzine are safe and efficient oral premedicants. However, alprazolam is preferable to hydroxyzine in terms of anxiolytic and adverse effects.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1989

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of the H1-receptor antagonist hydroxyzine in the elderly.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the antipruritic H1-receptor antagonist hydroxyzine hydrochloride were studied in nine healthy, fasting subjects (mean age 69.5 +/- 3.7 years) who ingested a single dose of hydroxyzine syrup, 0.7 mg/kg (mean dose 49.0 +/- 6.7 mg). Blood samples were collected hourly for 6 hours, every 2 hours from 6 to 12 hours, at 24 hours, and then every 24 hours for 144 hours. At these times an intradermal injection of 0.01 ml of a 0.1 mg/ml histamine phosphate solution was performed, and wheal and flare areas were computed. The serum elimination t1/2 of hydroxyzine was 29.3 +/- 10.1 hours; the volume of distribution was 22.5 +/- 6.3 L/kg; the clearance rate was 9.6 +/- 3.2 ml/min/kg, and the AUC was 1383.1 +/- 1039.0 ng.hr/ml. The mean serum elimination t1/2 of cetirizine, the active metabolite of hydroxyzine generated in vivo, was 24.8 +/- 7.7 hours, not significantly different from that of the parent compound (p = 0.05). After a single dose of hydroxyzine the mean wheal and flare areas were significantly suppressed from 1 to 144 hours, compared with the mean predose wheal and flare sizes (p less than 0.01). Maximum wheal suppression, compared with all other wheals measured during the study, occurred from 4 to 10 hours, inclusive, and maximum flare suppression occurred from 2 to 72 hours, inclusive (p less than 0.01). Hydroxyzine has a long t1/2 and a large volume of distribution in the elderly. The suppressive effect on the wheal and flare after a single dose of hydroxyzine is also extremely prolonged, suggesting the possibility of enhanced H1-receptor activity in old age.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2002

Efficacy and safety of hydroxyzine in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a 3-month double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) represents an important public health issue. Hydroxyzine, an antagonist of histamine receptors, showed both efficacy and safety in previous short-term double-blind studies over placebo in this pathology. The aim of the current study was to confirm those positive results over a 3-month period in adult outpatients. METHOD: This multicenter, parallel (hydroxyzine [50 mg/day]; bromazepam [6 mg/day]), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included 2 weeks of single-blind run-in placebo, 12 weeks of double-blind randomized treatment, and 4 weeks of single-blind run-out placebo. Three hundred thirty-four of 369 selected outpatients with a diagnosis of GAD according to DSM-IV criteria and a Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) total score >/= 20 were randomized before entering the double-blind period. The primary outcome criterion was the change in the HAM-A score from baseline to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with hydroxyzine compared with placebo. RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat analysis, the mean +/- SD change in HAM-A scores from baseline to endpoint was -12.16 +/- 7.74 for hydroxyzine and -9.64 +/- 7.74 for placebo (p =.019). Results at endpoint for percentage of responders (p =.003) and remission rates (p =.028), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale score (p =.001), maintenance of efficacy (p =.022), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale score on day 84 (p =.008) also confirmed the efficacy of hydroxyzine over placebo. The study showed no statistically significant difference between hydroxyzine and bromazepam. Except for drowsiness, which was more frequent with bromazepam, safety results were comparable in the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Hydroxyzine showed both efficacy and safety in the treatment of GAD and appears to be an effective alternative treatment to benzodiazepine prescription.

Adult↗