Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “HIV Protease”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

HIV protease (HIV PR) inhibitor structure-activity-selectivity, and active site molecular modeling of high affinity Leu [CH(OH)CH2]Val modified viral and nonviral substrate analogs.

This report details the structure-activity relationships of the HIV gag substrate analog Val-Ser-Gln-Asn-Leu psi[CH(OH)CH2]Val-Ile-Val (U-85548E), an inhibitor exhibiting subnanomolar affinity towards HIV type-1 aspartic proteinase (HIV-1 PR). Our data show that the P1-P2' tripeptidyl sequence provides the minimal chemical determinant for HIV-1 PR binding. We describe the structure-activity properties of Leu psi[CH(OH)CH2]Val substitution in other peptidyl ligands of nonviral substrate origin (e.g., angiotensinogen, insulin and pepstatin). Furthermore, the aspartic proteinase selectivities of a few key compounds are summarized relative to evaluation against human renin, human pepsin, and the fungal enzyme, rhizopuspepsin. These studies have led to the rational design of nanomolar potent inhibitors of both HIV-1 and HIV-2 PR. Finally, a 2.5 A resolution X-ray crystallographic structure of U-85548E complexed to synthetic HIV-1 PR dimer (Jaskolski et al., Biochemistry 30, 1600 [1991]) provided a 3-D picture of the inhibitor bound to the enzyme active site, and we performed computer-assisted molecular modeling studies to explore the possible binding modes of the above series of Leu psi[CH(OH)CH2]Val substituted HIV-1 PR inhibitors.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Crystallization of a non-B and a B mutant HIV protease.

HIV polymorphism is responsible for the selection of variant viruses resistant to inhibitors used in AIDS treatment. Knowledge of the mechanism of resistance of those viruses is determinant to the development of new inhibitors able to stop, or at least slow down, the disease's progress caused by new mutations. In this paper, the crystallization and preliminary crystallographic structure solution for two multi-resistant 99 amino acid HIV proteases, both isolated from Brazilian patients failing intensive anti-AIDS therapy are presented, viz. the subtype B mutant, with mutations Q7K, S37N, R41K, K45R, I54V, L63P, A71V, V82A and L90M, and the subtype F (wild type), naturally carrying mutations Q7K, I15V, E35D, M36I, S37N, R41K, R57K, D60E, Q61N, I62V, L63S, I64L and L89M, with respect to the B consensus sequence. Both proteins crystallized as a complex with the inhibitor TL-3 in space group P6(1)22. X-ray diffraction data were collected from these crystals to resolutions of 2.1 and 2.6 A for the subtype B mutant and subtype F wild type, respectively, and the enzyme structures were solved by molecular replacement. The crystals of subtype F HIV protease are, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the first protein crystals obtained for a non-B HIV protease.

Crystallization↗

Hyperlipidemia and inhibitors of HIV protease.

HIV protease inhibitors have been successfully incorporated into therapy for patients with HIV. These otherwise efficacious treatments present with multiple metabolic side-effects and body habitus changes known as the lipodystrophy syndrome. Direct associations of the lipid abnormalities with protease inhibitor use have been described, and ongoing studies are focused on describing mechanisms for future intervention. Mechanisms based on the molecular identity of the protease inhibitor target with human proteins, interference with aspects critical to lipoprotein production, and interference with adipocyte differentiation have been described. This review highlights the complexities of this syndrome, and discusses putative mechanisms whereby protease inhibitors cause hyperlipidemia.

Adipocytes↗

In-vitro and in-vivo pharmacokinetic interactions of amprenavir, an HIV protease inhibitor, with other current HIV protease inhibitors in rats.

The drug interactions between a new human immune deficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitor, amprenavir, and four other protease inhibitors which are presently used have been characterized by in-vitro metabolic studies using rat liver microsomal fractions and in-vivo oral administration studies. The metabolic clearance rates (Vmax/Km) of amprenavir, saquinavir, indinavir and nelfinavir in rat liver microsomes were 50.67+/- 3.77, 170.88 +/- 15.34, 73.01 +/- 2.76 and 126.06 +/- 6.23 microLmin(-1) (mg protein)(-1), respectively, and the degree of metabolicclearance was in the order of saquinavir > nelfinavir > indinavir > amprenavir > ritonavir. The inhibition constants (Ki) of ritonavir for amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir and saquinavir were 2.29, 0.95, 1.01 and 1.64 microM, respectively, and that of indinavir for amprenavir was 0.67, indicating that amprenavir metabolism in rat liver microsomes was strongly inhibited by indinavir. The Ki values of amprenavir for indinavir, nelfinavir and saquinavir were 7.41, 2.13 and 16.11 microM, respectively, and those of nelfinavirand saquinavirforamprenavirwere 9.15 and 34.57 microM, respectively. The area under the concentration vs time curve (AUC) of amprenavir after oral co-administration with saquinavir, indinavir, nelfinavir or ritonavir (20 mg kg(-1) for each oral dose in rats) was increased by 1.6-, 2.0-, 1.2- and 9.1-fold, respectively. The AUC values of saquinavir, indinavir and nelfinavir by co-administration with amprenavir showed about 7.3-, 1.3-, and 7.9-fold increase, respectively. These observations suggested that the oral bioavailability of amprenavir was not so affected by co-administration with saquinavir, nelfinavir or indinavir, compared with ritonavir, whereas amprenavir markedly affected the oral bioavailability of saquinavir and nelfinavir. In addition, the in-vivo effects after co-administration of two kinds of HIV protease inhibitors cannot always be predicted from in-vitro data, suggesting the presence of other interaction processes besides metabolism in the liver. However, these results provide useful information for the treatment of AIDS patients when they receive a combination therapy with two kinds of HIV protease inhibitor.

Administration, Oral↗

Design and synthesis of broad-based mono- and bi- cyclic inhibitors of FIV and HIV proteases.

Based on the substrate transition state and our strategy to tackle the problem of drug resistance, a series of HIV/FIV protease (HIV /FIV PR) monocyclic inhibitors incorporating a 15- or 17-membered macrocycle with an equivalent P3 or P3' group and a unique unnatural amino acid, (2R, 3S)-3-amino-2-hydroxy-4-phenylbutyric acid, have been designed and synthesized. In addition, based on the structure of TL3 with small P3/P3' group, we have synthesized two conformationally restricted bicyclic inhibitors containing the macrocycle, which mimic the P1/P1'-P3/P3' tripeptide [Phe-Val-Ala] of TL3. We have found that the contribution of the macrocycle in our monocyclic inhibitors is important to the overall activity, but the ring size does not affect the activity to a significant extent. Several inhibitors that were developed in this work, exhibit low nanomolar inhibitory activity against the wild-type HIV/FIV PR and found to be highly effective against some drug-resistant as well as TL3-resistant mutants of HIV PRs. Compound 15, in particular, is the most effective cyclic inhibitor in hand to inhibit FIV replication in tissue culture at a concentration of 1.0 micro g/mL (1.2 microM).

Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases↗

HIV protease genotype and viral sensitivity to HIV protease inhibitors following saquinavir therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between HIV protease genotype and altered protease inhibitor sensitivity of isolates from patients after therapy with saquinavir (SQV) in its hard gelatin formulation. DESIGN: Forty-one post-therapy isolates and corresponding baseline samples were obtained from 37 patients in four different clinical trials after therapy with SQV for 16-147 weeks. Post-therapy isolates were selected on the basis of preliminary sequence or drug sensitivity data. RESULTS: Fifteen out of 17 isolates without detectable Val-48 or Met-90 mutations retained sensitivity to SQV. (The remaining isolates showed only a marginal increase in median inhibitory concentration.) In addition, three out of 15 isolates with Met-90 retained sensitivity to all other protease inhibitors tested (indinavir, ritonavir, amprenavir, nelfinavir). Of the isolates showing reduced sensitivity to SQV, six out of 22 retained sensitivity to all other protease inhibitors, whereas only four out of 22 showed broad cross-resistance to all protease inhibitors tested. The reduction in sensitivity correlated closely with the presence of Val-48 or Met-90. Subsequent accessory substitutions were also linked to reduced sensitivity. However, significant linkage was observed only between mutations at residues 48 and 82 and between those at residues 82 and 74. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment of Val-48/Met-90 mutations was not found to be synonymous with cross-resistance. Indeed, the majority of isolates with these mutations retained sensitivity to at least one protease inhibitor (Val-48, 86%; Met-90, 77%). The recruitment of accessory mutations may occur only after the selection of key resistance mutations. Furthermore, Met-90 was found to be a poor marker of cross-resistance in SQV-treated patients.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

Determining and overcoming resistance to HIV protease inhibitors.

HIV protease represents a major target for development of antiviral therapeutics. The introduction of HIV protease (PR) inhibitors (PIs) to clinical practice and the application of highly active antiretroviral therapy resulted in decreased mortality and prolonged life expectancy of HIV-positive patients. However, the high polymorphism of HIV leads to rapid selection of viral variants resistant towards the inhibitors. Such resistant PR variants have developed in HIV-positive patients after treatment with any of the eight PIs approved for clinical use. In this review we overview (i) the methods for the identification and assessment of viral resistance in HIV positive patients, and (ii) the approaches medicinal chemists take to overcome it. Rational antiviral therapy brings about the need for quantitative assessment of the level of drug resistance development in the course of the treatment. At present, two main approaches are taken: in genotypic assays the viral sequences are PCR amplified, sequenced and changes in the viral gene sequence known to be associated with reduced drug sensitivity are identified, while phenotypic assays test the ability of a virus to grow in the presence of a drug or combination of drugs. The advantages and drawbacks of these methods, as well as their relevance for the therapy are discussed. We also review the efforts to design second-generation PIs, capable of potently inhibiting multi-resistant HIV-1 PR species, using structure-assisted design of the compounds targeted to the active site, as well as alternative approaches with compounds binding to other domains of the PR molecule.

Dimerization↗

6-Hydroxy-1,3-dioxin-4-ones as non-peptidic HIV protease inhibitors.

HIV protease inhibitors containing 6-hydroxy-1,3-dioxin-4-one ring system as a new scaffold have been prepared. Among them, compound 4d showed potent HIV protease inhibitory activity (IC50 = 0.01 microM) and antiviral activity in cell culture (EC50 = 0.96 microM, SI = 65.69).

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Design and synthesis of HIV protease inhibitors. Variations of the carboxy terminus of the HIV protease inhibitor L-682,679.

A series of tetrapeptide analogues of 1 (L-682,679), in which the carboxy terminus has been shortened and modified, was prepared and their inhibitory activity measured against the HIV protease in a peptide cleavage assay. Selected examples were tested as inhibitors of virus spread in cell culture. Compound 12 was a 10-fold more potent enzyme inhibitor than 1 in vitro and 30-fold more potent in inhibiting the viral spread in cells.

Antiviral Agents↗

From nonpeptide toward noncarbon protease inhibitors: metallacarboranes as specific and potent inhibitors of HIV protease.

HIV protease (PR) represents a prime target for rational drug design, and protease inhibitors (PI) are powerful antiviral drugs. Most of the current PIs are pseudopeptide compounds with limited bioavailability and stability, and their use is compromised by high costs, side effects, and development of resistant strains. In our search for novel PI structures, we have identified a group of inorganic compounds, icosahedral metallacarboranes, as candidates for a novel class of nonpeptidic PIs. Here, we report the potent, specific, and selective competitive inhibition of HIV PR by substituted metallacarboranes. The most active compound, sodium hydrogen butylimino bis-8,8-[5-(3-oxa-pentoxy)-3-cobalt bis(1,2-dicarbollide)]di-ate, exhibited a K(i) value of 2.2 nM and a submicromolar EC(50) in antiviral tests, showed no toxicity in tissue culture, weakly inhibited human cathepsin D and pepsin, and was inactive against trypsin, papain, and amylase. The structure of the parent cobalt bis(1,2-dicarbollide) in complex with HIV PR was determined at 2.15 A resolution by protein crystallography and represents the first carborane-protein complex structure determined. It shows the following mode of PR inhibition: two molecules of the parent compound bind to the hydrophobic pockets in the flap-proximal region of the S3 and S3' subsites of PR. We suggest, therefore, that these compounds block flap closure in addition to filling the corresponding binding pockets as conventional PIs. This type of binding and inhibition, chemical and biological stability, low toxicity, and the possibility to introduce various modifications make boron clusters attractive pharmacophores for potent and specific enzyme inhibition.

Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases↗

HIV protease as a target for retrovirus vector-mediated gene therapy.

The dimeric aspartyl protease of HIV has been the subject of intense research for almost a decade. Knowledge of the substrate specificity and catalytic mechanism of this enzyme initially guided the development of several potent peptidomimetic small molecule inhibitors. More recently, the solution of the HIV protease structure led to the structure-based design of improved peptidomimetic and non-peptidomimetic antiviral compounds. Despite the qualified success of these inhibitors, the high mutation rate associated with RNA viruses continues to hamper the long-term clinical efficacy of HIV protease inhibitors. The dimeric nature of the viral protease has been conducive to the investigation of dominant-negative inhibitors of the enzyme. Some of these inhibitors are defective protease monomers that interact with functional monomers to form inactive protease heterodimers. An advantage of macromolecular inhibitors as compared to small-molecule inhibitors is the increased surface area of interaction between the inhibitor and the target gene product. Point mutations that preserve enzyme activity but confer resistance to small-molecule inhibitors are less likely to have an adverse effect on macromolecular interactions. The use of efficient retrovirus vectors has facilitated the delivery of these macromolecular inhibitors to primary human lymphocytes. The vector-transduced cells were less susceptible to HIV infection in vitro, and showed similar levels of protection compared to other macromolecular inhibitors of HIV replication, such as RevM10. These preliminary results encourage the further development of dominant-negative HIV protease inhibitors as a gene therapy-based antiviral strategy.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Nonpeptidic HIV protease inhibitors possessing excellent antiviral activities and therapeutic indices. PD 178390: a lead HIV protease inhibitor.

With the insight generated by the availability of X-ray crystal structures of various 5,6-dihydropyran-2-ones bound to HIV PR, inhibitors possessing various alkyl groups at the 6-position of 5,6-dihydropyran-2-one ring were synthesized. The inhibitors possessing a 6-alkyl group exhibited superior antiviral activities when compared to 6-phenyl analogues. Antiviral efficacies were further improved upon introduction of a polar group (hydroxyl or amino) on the 4-position of the phenethyl moiety as well as the polar group (hydroxymethyl) on the 3-(tert-butyl-5-methyl-phenylthio) moiety. The polar substitution is also advantageous for decreasing toxicity, providing inhibitors with higher therapeutic indices. The best inhibitor among this series, (S)-6-[2-(4-aminophenyl)-ethyl]-(3-(2-tert-butyl-5-methyl-phenylsulfa nyl)-4-hydroxy-6-isopropyl-5,6-dihydro-pyran-2-one (34S), exhibited an EC50 of 200 nM with a therapeutic index of > 1000. More importantly, these non-peptidic inhibitors, 16S and 34S, appear to offer little cross-resistance to the currently marketed peptidomimetic PR inhibitors. The selected inhibitors tested in vitro against mutant HIV PR showed a very small increase in binding affinities relative to wild-type HIV PR. Cmax and absolute bioavailability of 34S were higher and half-life and time above EC95 were longer compared to 16S. Thus 34S, also known as PD 178390, which displays good antiviral efficacy, promising pharmacokinetic characteristics and favorable activity against mutant enzymes and CYP3A4, has been chosen for further preclinical evaluation.

Cell Line↗

Metabolic complications associated with HIV protease inhibitor therapy.

HIV protease inhibitors were introduced into clinical practice over 7 years ago as an important component of combination antiretroviral drug regimens which in many ways revolutionised the treatment of HIV infection. The significant improvements in prognosis that have resulted from the use of these regimens, combined with the need for lifelong treatment, have increasingly focused attention on the adverse effects of antiretroviral drugs and on the metabolic complications of HIV protease inhibitors in particular. In this review, the cluster of metabolic abnormalities characterised by triglyceride-rich dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance associated with HIV protease inhibitor therapy are considered, along with implications for cardiovascular risk in patients affected by these complications. Toxicity profiles of individual drugs within the HIV protease inhibitor class are examined, as there is an increased recognition of significant intra-class differences both in terms of absolute risk of metabolic complications as well as the particular metabolic phenotype associated with these drugs. Guidelines for clinical assessment and treatment are emphasised, along with pathophysiological mechanisms that may provide a rational basis for the treatment of metabolic complications. Finally, these drug-specific effects are considered within the context of HIV-specific effects on lipid metabolism as well as lifestyle factors that have contributed to a rapidly increasing incidence of similar metabolic syndromes in the general population. These data highlight the importance of individualising patient management in terms of choice of antiretroviral regimen, assessment of metabolic outcomes and use of therapeutic interventions, based on the assessment of baseline (pre-treatment) metabolic status as well as the presence of potentially modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.

Body Composition↗

Current knowledge and future prospects for the use of HIV protease inhibitors.

The HIV protease (or proteinase) enzyme is an essential component of the replicative cycle of HIV, performing the post-transitional processing of the gag and gag-pol gene products into the functional core proteins and viral enzymes. Inhibition of this enzyme leads to production of immature noninfectious viral progeny, and hence prevention of further rounds of infection. Structurally, the enzyme is a homodimer consisting of two identical 99 amino acid chains. HIV protease is a member of the aspartic protease family but is structurally dissimilar to human aspartic proteases such as renin, gastricsin and cathepsin D and E, suggesting the possibility of creating inhibitors with a wide therapeutic index. At least 6 inhibitors of HIV protease are currently in clinical development: saquinavir, indinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir (AG-1343), KNI-272 and VX-478, the first four of which have shown antiretroviral activity and acceptable tolerability in initial phase I/II clinical trials. Resistance or reduced sensitivity to the leading protease inhibitors has been reported in vivo and appears to be associated with loss of therapeutic effect. However, resistance patterns appear to be distinct. Treatment for 1 year with indinavir has been reported to lead to selection of virus in 4 patients, which was cross-resistant to all other leading protease inhibitors. On the other hand, a larger series of clinical isolates from patients receiving saquinavir alone or in combination with zidovudine for up to 3 years did not lead to virus cross-resistant to either indinavir or ritonavir. This suggests that care should be exercised in designing the sequence of protease usage. Additionally, differing resistance patterns may be used to select combinations of protease inhibitors in future trials. Data from studies combining protease inhibitors with nucleoside analogues suggest value in terms of larger and more prolonged virological and immunological marker responses than are observed with single agent therapy, and this is likely to be the primary role for protease inhibitors; both in initial combinations for patients commencing therapy and as add-in therapies for patients previously treated with antiretrovirals. However, in vitro and animal pharmacokinetic studies also give evidence of the possibility of combining protease inhibitors, potentially leading to improved bioavailability, antiviral synergy and delay in emergence of viral resistance.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Novel arylsulfonamides possessing sub-picomolar HIV protease activities and potent anti-HIV activity against wild-type and drug-resistant viral strains.

A novel series of P1' chain-extended arylsufonamides was synthesized and evaluated for wild-type HIV protease inhibitory activity and in vitro antiviral activity against wild type virus and two protease inhibitor-resistant mutant viruses. All of the compounds showed dramatic increases in enzyme activity as compared to the currently marketed HIV protease inhibitors amprenavir, indinavir, and nelfinavir. In addition, significant improvements in antiviral potencies against wild type and the two mutant viruses were also realized.

Animals↗

HIV protease inhibitors: their anti-HIV activity and potential role in treatment.

Researchers are continuing to uncover important new information about the life cycle of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and are further elucidating the products of the viral genome in their efforts to develop anti-retroviral therapies that are more effective and safer than those currently available. Although much attention has been focused on inhibiting proviral DNA synthesis with nucleoside analogues, other classes of agents are being explored that may enable clinicians to inhibit HIV transmission in vivo by targeting other stages of the viral life cycle. Among the novel approaches under investigation is inhibition of HIV protease, the proteolytic enzyme that is responsible for the cleavage of large precursor proteins in the budding virion. Preclinical studies indicate that protease inhibitors prevent the maturation of immature viral particles into infectious virions and thereby limit the spread of HIV in cell cultures. Laboratory data have also shown that these agents have good toxic-effect profiles, and recent improvements have resulted in compounds that are more bioavailable. As phase I studies of this modality are undertaken, clinical researchers will be carefully monitoring them to determine whether these favorable in vitro characteristics of protease inhibitors will be evident in the clinical arena as well.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗