SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The line separating the seeing from the nonseeing parts of the visual field was found to be tilted away from the expected vertical position in 24 of 200 patients diagnosed as having various types of hemianopia, including homonymous hemianopia, homonymous quadrant hemianopia, homonymous scotomata, and bitemporal hemianopia. The causes of these defects include vascular accidents, trauma, tumor, and neurosurgery for convulsive disorders. Once discovered by standard monocular field testing methods, the existence of the tilting phenomenon was distinguished from testing artifact by employing binocular fixation and red-green glasses along with red and green test objects. A difference in the overlapping fields of the two eyes was found to exist only in areas where corresponding lines between seeing and nonseeing fields were separated by a tilting away from the vertical in one or both eyes. This can occur superiorly or inferiorly with homonymous scotomata, and in bitemporal hemianopia as well as in homonymous hemianopia or quadrant hemianopia. This incongruity of fields is possibly explained by a variation in anatomic determination of crossing from noncrossing fibers at the level of the retina.
PURPOSE: To compare visual sensitivity, fatigue effect, and probability plot data between Full Threshold (FT) Humphrey automated perimetry and Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) standard strategies in patients with optic neuropathies and hemianopias. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with nonglaucomatous optic neuropathies and 18 patients with a relative homonymous or bitemporal hemianopia were tested with both conventional perimetry (Humphrey 24-2 program) and "back to back" SITA standard tests (SITA 1, SITA 2) to approximate the test time of the FT test conditions. Also, 28 normal subjects between the ages of 20 and 80 were tested with this protocol. The visual field quadrants with the most damage were used to evaluate any fatigue effect (i.e., possible lack of fatigue effect with SITA standard due to the shorter test time) and to compare probability plot data between FT, SITA 1, and SITA 2. Pointwise total and pattern deviation probability plot defects were weighted by degree of significance and summed. RESULTS: Test times for normal subjects were 45 seconds longer for FT than for the combined test time of SITA 1 + SITA 2. Patients' test times were 40 seconds longer for hemianopias and 90 seconds longer for optic neuropathies with FT than the combined times for two SITA tests. There were higher sensitivities found with SITA 1 compared with Full Threshold (1.06 dB, P< 0.001) and SITA 2 with Full Threshold (0.73 dB, P< 0.001) in the most damaged quadrant for the optic neuropathy patients; for the hemianopia patients the difference in values were between SITA 1 and Full Threshold (0.96 dB, P = 0.07) and between SITA 2 and Full Threshold (0.11 dB, P = 0.87). The second SITA standard test had lower sensitivity than the first SITA standard test by 0.82 dB in hemianopias and by 0.71 dB in optic neuropathy patients. Analysis of the total and pattern deviation probability plot data showed slightly more defects (number and magnitude) with SITA 1 compared to FT for both groups, but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivities were higher in patients with hemianopias or optic neuropathies using SITA standard compared with FT by approximately 1 dB. The probability plot comparison suggests SITA standard is at least as good as FT for detection of visual loss in individual examinations. However, efficacy of SITA standard for serial examinations has not yet been evaluated.
"Crossed homonymous hemianopia" and "crossed left hemispatial neglect" were observed in a woman with Marchiafava-Bignami disease. Two forms of "crossed homonymous hemianopia" were observed. Initially, Goldmann perimeter testing showed a left homonymous hemianopia with the right hand and vice versa. Later, confrontation tests showed a left homonymous hemianopia, whereas visual field testing using the Goldmann perimeter (kinetic quantitative perimeter) and the OCTOPUS (Interzeag AG, static automated perimeter) showed a right homonymous hemianopia with either hand. "Crossed left hemispatial neglect" was not seen with the left hand, but neglect of the left hemifield was seen with the right hand. CT and MRI showed a lesion occupying almost the entire corpus callosum. PET showed no significant differences between comparable areas of the left and right cerebral hemispheres. These findings indicate that both signs of interhemispheric disconnection were due to the callosal lesion. Moreover, the "crossed left hemispatial neglect" can be explained as being a consequence of the dominance of the right cerebral hemisphere for visuospatial recognition.
In this paper we report findings which question the diagnosis of a hemianopia in B.Q., a 66-year-old lady who shows unilateral spatial neglect following a lesion to the right parietal lobe. The presence of a hemianopia has been indicated following two independent assessments of B.Q.'s visual fields. We examined B.Q.'s performance on a visuo-spatial task in which single or double stimuli were displayed left and right of a central fixation point. B.Q. failed to report left stimuli when the fixation point was continuously displayed (OVERLAP CONDITION). This performance is consistent with the suggestion of a left hemianopia as indicated by perimetric field testing. In a further condition the fixation point was extinguished prior to stimuli onset (GAP CONDITION). B.Q. consistently responded to left stimuli in the gap condition and also showed improved performance to right stimuli. Eye movements were recorded on a separate testing session, in which B.Q. showed a normal saccadic response to left targets in the gap condition, but not during the overlap condition. These results suggest that B.Q.'s failure to report left stimuli during field plotting is due to her neglecting left stimuli and not because she has a visual field defect. By using a testing procedure which reduces the severity of neglect B.Q. is able to respond to left stimuli. Reducing the severity of B.Q.'s neglect also abolishes the apparent hemianopia. Standard field plotting techniques which use a consistently displayed fixation point may not be appropriate for the testing of neglect patients' visual fields.
PURPOSE: To correlate the neuro-ophthalmological observations with the magnetic resonance images (MRI) and positron emission tomographic (PET) findings in a case with left homonymous hemianopia and left hemispatial neglect. CASE: A 57-year-old woman underwent surgery for a ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm. After she recovered consciousness, it was found that she had left homonymous hemianopia and left hemispatial neglect. Although the hemispatial neglect slowly improved, the homonymous hemianopia persisted. MRI and measurements of cerebral glucose metabolism by 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose(FDG)-PET were performed 1 year later. RESULTS: MRI revealed infarctions on the medial surface of the frontal lobe, on the right medial surface of the occipital lobe, and global atrophy of the right cortical hemisphere. FDG-PET disclosed severe glucose hypometabolism in the entire right hemisphere. Glucose metabolism in the right occipital cortex was 61.1% of that in the homologous region on the left side, 62.8% in the right anterior cingulate gyrus, and 93.8% in the temporal-parietal-occipital junction. CONCLUSIONS: The low glucose metabolism in the right visual cortex explains the persistent left hemianopia, and that in the right anterior cingulate gyrus and the right temporal-parietal-occipital junction may be responsible for the left hemispatial neglect. The relatively mild damage in the right temporal-parietal-occipital junction explained the recovery of the neglect symptom. Measurements of regional cerebral glucose metabolism by PET are useful for determining the cause of cerebral visual dysfunction and its prognosis after a cerebral lesion.
We used a visual distance reproduction task (endpoint task) to evaluate horizontal space representation in two left brain damaged (LBD) and three right brain damaged (RBD) patients with contralateral homonymous hemianopia and no neglect. All patients were examined in the chronic phase of the stroke and were aware of their visual field defect. Along with contralesional deviation in the line bisection task, all patients estimated size (Landmark task) and distances in the contralesional space as being longer than equivalent size and distances located in the ipsilesional space. Misreproduction of distances was abolished or reduced when the task was performed in the ipsilesional head-centred space with the head turned contralesionally. This finding points out that misrepresentation of horizontal space linked to hemianopia can be modulated by combined proprioceptive input from eye and neck muscles. The pattern of misrepresentation found in chronic hemianopic patients is opposite to the one described in chronic neglect patients with concomitant hemianopia. These different patterns of space misrepresentation are the likely consequence of the presence, in hemianopics, and the absence, in neglect patients with hemianopia, of compensatory strategies based on the non-retinotopic and multimodal coding of spatial positions falling in the retinotopically organised blind field.
PURPOSE: We have noted the frequent finding of an ipsilateral head turn in children with early-onset homonymous hemianopia. We report a series of patients with these findings and propose a theory to explain this association. METHODS: Ten patients with early-onset homonymous hemianopia and anomalous head posture were examined. Head computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a cerebral lesion as the cause of the hemianopia in all patients. RESULTS: All patients had onset of central nervous system disease prenatally or before age 18 months. A head turn toward the visual field defect with a gaze preference contralateral to the visual field defect was present in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Early-onset homonymous hemianopia should be included in the differential diagnosis of anomalous head posture.
PURPOSE: To determine new criteria for early detection of temporal hemianopia in patients with asymptomatic pituitary tumor. METHODS: Fifteen patients without visual symptoms had pituitary tumor and subtle defects or normal visual fields by Goldmann perimetry. Twelve patients with visual symptoms had pituitary adenoma and visual field defects detected by Goldmann perimetry. All were examined by automated perimetry. The relationship between the tumor and the optic chiasm was graded by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on a scale of 0-4. Grade number increased with extent of compression. Temporal hemianopia observed by automated perimetry was estimated from normal data (52 normal fields). Vertical step was determined from the number of adjacent pairs along the midline; sensitivity was lower in the temporal field than in the nasal field. Temporal depression was calculated by the quadrant sum of sensitivity. RESULTS: All patients with symptomatic pituitary adenoma had vertical step and temporal depression in the upper field. Nine of 15 patients without visual symptoms had vertical step or temporal depression. Of nine patients with temporal hemianopia, two of four patients had grade 1 compression, three of five had grade 2, and four of four had grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: New criteria by automated perimetry could detect temporal hemianopia in patients with asymptomatic pituitary tumor.
We examined ocular fixations during line bisection in five patients with left hemianopia, two patients with right hemianopia, nine patients with left hemi-neglect and nine normal control subjects. Compared with measures in control subjects, the median fixation, and left- and rightmost fixations were shifted contralaterally in patients with hemianopia alone and ipsilaterally in patients with hemi-neglect. The fixation with the longest duration and the bisection point were also shifted contralaterally with hemianopia and ipsilaterally with hemi-neglect. However, the number of fixations and the spatial range spanned by fixations did not differ between the groups, showing that ocular exploration was not truncated in any group. Only some patients showed a previously reported directional search bias. Overall, there was no directional bias in saccadic number or amplitude. The distribution of fixations was most dense at the centre of the line in normal subjects, while hemianopic patients fixated most frequently at the ends of lines in their contralateral (blind) hemispace and at a central locus that was biased slightly contralaterally, as was their bisection judgement. This contralateral bias may reflect either an adaptive contralateral attentional gradient or a non-veridical spatial representation within the remaining normal hemifield. Hemi-neglect patients had a broad distribution of fixation peaks in the ipsilateral hemispace. Of two hemi-neglect patients with many fixations, one clustered fixations at a position right of centre, as if a normal fixation pattern was shifted rightward, while the other had two fixation peaks: one to the far right and the other near the centre of the line, reminiscent of the dual peaks of activity seen in some recent hemi-neglect models. These data reveal a heterogeneity in the routes by which right-biased judgements of spatial centre are reached by hemi-neglect patients.
Multiple hypometric (undershooting) saccades are generally reported as a compensatory strategy in adults with homonymous hemianopia. However, hypermetric (overshooting) saccades have been reported to develop spontaneously as a beneficial strategy in response to predictable targets. We examined the saccades of 10 children (aged 5 to 16 years) with homonymous hemianopia to determine the type of compensatory eye-movement strategies employed 6 months to 16 years after hemianopia onset. Homonymous hemianopia was identified using perimetry and/or pattern visual evoked potentials and supported with results of neuroimaging. Eye movements were recorded using bitemporal electrooculography. Saccades were elicited to a red light source in a semipredictable paradigm. We found that hypermetria was not a consistent compensatory strategy in our patients. In spite of the predictability of our paradigm and the long follow-up period, multiple hypometric saccades into the blind field appeared to be the preferred strategy.
The gross anatomy of the optic nerves and chiasma has been studied, and differences in the tension in the crossed and uncrossed fibres after chiasmal displacement have been investigated. The anterior and posterior attachments of the medial and lateral fibres of the nerves have been studied. The chiasma has been dissected under low power microscopy and a three dimensional picture of it developed. Bitemporal hemianopia, as well as associated or independent hemianopic scotomata, results from stretching of the crossing fibres in the chiasma. Binasal hemianopia results from compression of the uncrossed fibres in the optic nerve or chiasma by the anterior cerebral or internal carotid arteries. The compression is effective because it is sharply localized and, probably as a result of pulsation, deeply grooves the nerve with a resulting acute distortion of fibres; it is likely that the lax lateral fibres would be less affected by a more widely spread compression. When this defect develops on top of an existing bitemporal hemianopia, it is believed that its usual cause remains the same. The crossed and uncrossed fibres of the optic chiasma differ not only anatomically in the areas of retina in which they arise but also physically. Tension is the force which occasions bitemporal hemianopia and pressure that which produces nasal field defects.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the scanpaths of patients with homonymous hemianopia while viewing naturalistic pictures in their original and also spatially filtered forms. Features of their scanpaths with respect to various saccade and fixation parameters were examined to determine whether they develop compensatory eye movement strategies. The effects of various lesion parameters including location, size, and age on the evolution of such strategies were considered. METHODS: Eye movements of eight patients with homonymous hemianopia (four left, four right), but lacking neglect, were recorded while they viewed 22 images of real scenes, and they were compared with the eye movements of eight age matched controls. Subjects viewed each image for 3 seconds, initially in a spatially filtered form in which much of the semantic content had been removed, and then in their unfiltered, original form. RESULTS: Patients differed significantly from controls in various fixation and saccade parameters. For fixation parameters patients with hemianopia fixated different spatial positions from controls, made more fixations which were more widely distributed and of shorter duration than controls, and spent a greater proportion of their total fixation time in the area corresponding to their blind hemifield. They did not make significantly more refixations than controls. For saccade parameters patients made more saccades into their blind hemifield, these saccades having shorter latencies and shorter amplitudes than those made into their seeing field, and had longer scanpaths than control subjects. The amplitude of their first saccade was longer than that of controls although its direction did not correlate simply with the side of the field defect. Their mean saccade amplitude was similar to that of controls. Filtering out high spatial frequencies within images seemed to accentuate the described differences between eye movement characteristics of hemianopes and controls. Scanpath differences correlated with increasing age but not location or size of lesions causing the hemianopia. CONCLUSION: Various features of scanpaths produced by hemianopes were different from normal subjects. These differences correlated with lesion age and may reflect the evolution of a compensatory eye movement strategy.
Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS) syndrome has various presentations. We report on a case of MELAS in which alternate-sided homonymous hemianopia was the main symptom of recurrent neurological defects. A 19-year-old woman suffered from blurred vision, headaches, vomiting, and fever that subsided within days. The ophthalmic examination demonstrated right homonymous hemianopia. One month later a similar episode occurred again. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of her brain revealed an infarct in the left temporo-occipital lobes. Exercise tests showed lactic acidosis, and a muscle biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of mitochondrial myopathy. Half a month later, a third episode occurred. Visual field examination demonstrated left homonymous hemianopia and partial recovery of the right visual field. The infarct in the brain, as revealed by CT and MRI, was compatible with the visual field changes. MELAS should be ruled out in young patients who present with homonymous hemianopia accompanied by recurrent headaches or other recurrent symptoms.
Hysterical hemianopias are uncommon and usually occur in association with other lateralized complaints. The most frequent pattern consists of decreased vision in one eye, an ipsilateral hemianopia on testing the "affected" eye, full fields in the other eye, and a complete hemianopia toward the affected side on testng with both eyes open. The incompatibility of the monocular and binocular fields quickly demonstrates the functional nature of this alleged visual loss.
Two patients with complete dense left homonymous hemianopia of acute onset are presented. There was a striking difference in visuospatial orientation between them in the early stages of their disease, due to additional left hemineglect in the second patient. While eye movement patterns known to be typical for homonymous hemianopia were found in the first patient by means of infrared reflection oculography, the second showed several findings which could be attributed to hemineglect. Based on these observations and those described in earlier literature, oculographic criteria are listed that enable hemineglect to be detected in the presence of homonymous hemianopia. The practical importance of diagnosing hemineglect with objective and quantitative methods is stressed.
A case of bilateral inferior altitudinal hemianopia of cortical origin is reported. Although bilateral altitudinal hemianopias can be caused by more or less symmetrical involvement of visual pathways, it is shown how only three sites of these pathways are likely to be responsible for altitudinal hemianopias in human pathology.