Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Governing Board”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1985

Multi-institutional arrangements: relationships between governing boards and hospital chief executive officers.

This investigation focuses on the impact of multi-institutional arrangements on the role of governing boards in limiting or enhancing the managerial autonomy of individual hospitals. Data from a 1979 Special Survey by the American Hospital Association (N = 4213) are used to examine governing board-administrator relationships as a function of the degree of autonomy and scope of responsibility of the hospital governing board. It is hypothesized that governing boards responsible for multiple hospitals or for multiple nonhospital organizations and those boards accountable to a higher organizational authority will exercise more formal control over hospital chief executive officers (CEOs) than will boards of single or autonomous hospitals. The analysis assumes that formal control by the governing board over the management function of the individual hospital is exercised partly through soliciting or limiting participation by hospital administrators in key policy decisions and through the evaluation of administrative performance. Therefore, it is anticipated that hospitals governed by boards with multiple responsibilities as well as hospitals governed by boards accountable to a higher authority will be (1) less likely to have CEOs who are members of the governing board executive committee, (2) more likely to have annual performance reviews of the CEO by the governing board, and (3) more likely to have such reviews conducted according to preestablished criteria. Study results provide general support for the hypotheses with respect to hospital boards with multiple responsibilities: the data suggest that such boards do exercise greater control over hospital administrators and these effects do appear to be stronger for hospitals in the private sector. Hospitals governed by boards accountable to a higher authority, however, are more likely to have CEOs who are members of the governing board executive committee--a pattern in direct opposition to that hypothesized. Furthermore, these boards are no more likely to conduct annual CEO performance reviews than are boards with more autonomy. Boards accountable to higher authorities are more likely, however, to use preestablished criteria when such reviews are conducted. This general pattern is similar whether hospital boards are accountable to religious authorities, to investor-owned corporate boards, or to the boards of not-for-profit multi-institutional systems. A different pattern emerges, however, for boards accountable to a state, county, or local government authority.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Employee Performance Appraisal↗
PubMed1992

Governing board structure, business strategy, and performance of acute care hospitals: a contingency perspective.

Contingency theory suggests that for a hospital governing board to be effective in taking on a more active role in strategic management, the board needs to be structured to complement the overall strategy of the organization. A survey study was conducted to examine the strategies of acute care hospitals as related to the structural characteristics of their governing boards. After controlling for organizational size and system membership, results indicated a significant relationship between the governing board structure of 109 acute care hospitals and their overall business strategy. Strategy also accounted for more of the variance in board structure than either organization size or system membership. Finally, the greater the match between board structure and hospital strategy, the stronger the hospitals' financial performance.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1985

Formal relationships among governing boards, CEOs, and medical staffs in independent and system hospitals.

This study examines the impact of hospital participation in multi-institutional arrangements on formal relationships between hospital governing boards and chief executive officers (CEOs) and between governing boards and hospital medical staffs. Hypotheses are derived from Mintzberg's general theory of organizational design and are tested using combined data from three American Hospital Association Surveys of nonfederal, short-term hospitals. Analysis results provide considerable support for the study hypotheses. CEOs were found in general to have more formal influence in decisionmaking but also were more likely to be held accountable for performance standards in those hospitals that are part of multi-institutional arrangements. In addition, analyses using both 1976 and 1982 survey data indicate that hospital participation in multi-institutional arrangements is associated with lower levels of formal involvement of the medical staff in institutional decisionmaking. Relationships, for the most part, remain unchanged after the introduction of statistical controls for hospital size. One important issue raised by these findings is the possible impact on hospital performance of less participation by medical staff in the governance of hospitals whose boards are either responsible for multiple hospitals or accountable to higher organizational authority.

Decision Making, Organizational↗
PubMed1979

Governing board and management staff attitudes toward community mental health center citizen participation.

The present study investigated the attitudes and values of community and mental health center board and management staff of four Community Mental Health Centers and one mental health clinic toward the recent federal mandate calling for increased citizen involvement in center evaluation activities. Three related areas were address: (a) general attitudes toward citizen participation, (b) types of program-evaluation activities in which citizen input would be most useful; and (c) types of individuals who would best serve on citizen review groups. The results indicated that although board members are somewhat more optimistic about benefits received from citizen involvement, overall there was close agreement between the board and staff respondents in the three areas studied. These results were interpreted as substantiating the view that community mental health center boards typically reflect a provider orientation in their approach to mental health governance. A missing evaluation component in most centers is citizen participation as it reflects the values of its service consumers. It is advocated that only by developing consumer participation mechanisms will centers more readily achieve the goal of responsiveness to community needs.

Administrative Personnel↗