Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Goosecoid Protein”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Site-specific heterodimerization by paired class homeodomain proteins mediates selective transcriptional responses.

Alx4 is a paired class homeodomain protein involved in defining anterior/posterior polarity in the developing limb bud. The paired class of homeodomain proteins cooperatively bind palindromic DNA elements as homodimers or as heterodimers with other paired homeodomain proteins. Previous characterization demonstrates that the strength of the cooperativity as well as the preference for targets is dictated largely by the identity of amino acid 50 of the homeodomain. Here we compare and contrast the DNA binding properties of a glutamine 50 paired homeodomain protein, Alx4, and a lysine 50 paired homeodomain protein, Goosecoid. We demonstrate that Alx4 homodimers, Gsc homodimers, and Alx4/Gsc heterodimers each have distinct DNA binding properties, and each can discriminate between highly related palindromic elements. Using reporter gene assays, we show that Alx4 activates transcription in a site-specific manner, and that Gsc is capable of antagonizing Alx4-mediated activation only from promoter elements that support heterodimer formation. These data demonstrate that paired homeodomain proteins with different DNA binding properties are able to form heterodimeric complexes with unique DNA binding and transcriptional activities. Thus, heterodimerization regulates the DNA binding specificity of these transcription factors and may partially explain how paired homeodomain proteins direct specific developmental functions.

Animals↗

Negative autoregulation of the organizer-specific homeobox gene goosecoid.

The homeobox gene goosecoid has been implicated to play a central role in the Spemann organizer tissue of the vertebrate embryo. Misexpression of goosecoid on the ventral side of a Xenopus laevis gastrula embryo was shown to result in a partial duplication of the primary body axis, reminiscent of the Spemann organizer graft. Normal embryonic development thus requires tight temporal and spatial control of genes instrumental for organizer function. In the present study we investigated the transcriptional control of goosecoid gene expression. Sequence analysis of the mouse and human promoter region revealed the presence of two palindromic binding elements for homeobox genes of the prd type to which goosecoid belongs. We show that Goosecoid protein can bind to these sites in vitro. By using reporter gene constructs of the human and mouse promoter, we demonstrate that Goosecoid can act as a repressor of its own promoter activity in transient co-transfection experiments in mouse P19 cells and in Xenopus embryos. Autorepression depends on the presence of the homeodomain and is mediated through the prd element more proximal to the transcriptional start site. Our results suggest a role for goosecoid in restricting organizer activity in the vertebrate gastrula embryo.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

GOOSECOID inhibits erythrocyte differentiation by competing with Rb for PU.1 binding in murine cells.

Misexpression of the dorsal mesodermal patterning factor goosecoid on the ventral side of amphibian embryos results in inhibition of blood formation in early embryogenesis. To investigate the mechanism of this inhibition, we ectopically expressed goosecoid in erythroleukemia cells. While erythroid differentiation of these cells can be induced by activin, goosecoid expressing cells were unresponsive to activin. We demonstrate an in vitro interaction between the oncogene PU.1, an ets family transcription factor thought to play a role in erythropoiesis, and the goosecoid protein (GSC). Interaction with PU.1 was specific as GSC did not bind to the ets family members, Fli-1 or Ets-2. The ability of goosecoid expressing erythroleukemia cells to differentiate in response to activin was rescued by coexpression of the GSC-binding N-terminal portion of PU.1. The N-terminal portion of PU.1 was co-immunoprecipitated with anti-GSC antibodies as well. The N-terminal domain of PU.1 is the region recognized by the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), a tumor suppressor gene presumably involved in erythroid differentiation. We show that GSC competitively inhibits binding of Rb to PU.1. Our data suggest that the suppression of blood formation by GSC could, at least in part, be mediated by binding to PU.1.

Activins↗

Anterior neurectoderm is progressively induced during gastrulation: the role of the Xenopus homeobox gene orthodenticle.

In order to study the regional specification of neural tissue we isolated Xotx2, a Xenopus homolog of the Drosophila orthodenticle gene. Xotx2 is initially expressed in Spemann's organizer and its expression is absent in the ectoderm of early gastrulae. As gastrulation proceeds, Xotx2 expression is induced in the overlying ectoderm and this domain of expression moves anteriorly in register with underlying anterior mesoderm throughout the remainder of gastrulation. The expression pattern of Xotx2 suggests that a wave of Xotx2 expression (marking anterior neurectoderm) travels through the ectoderm of the gastrula with the movement of underlying anterior (prechordal plate) mesoderm. This expression of Xotx2 is reminiscent of the Eyal-Giladi model for neural induction. According to this model, anterior neural-inducing signals emanating from underlying anterior mesoderm transiently induce anterior neural tissues after vertical contact with the overlying ectoderm. Further patterning is achieved when the ectoderm receives caudalizing signals as it comes in contact with more posterior mesoderm during subsequent gastrulation movements. Functional characterization of the Xotx2 protein has revealed its involvement in differentiation of the anterior-most tissue, the cement gland. Ectopic expression of Xotx2 in embryos induces extra cement glands in the skin as well as inducing a cement gland marker (XAG1) in isolated animal cap ectoderm. Microinjection of RNA encoding the organizer-specific homeo-domain protein goosecoid into the ventral marginal zone results in induction of the Xotx2 gene. This result, taken in combination with the indistinguishable expression patterns of Xotx2 and goosecoid in the anterior mesoderm suggests that Xotx2 is a target of goosecoid regulation.

Animals↗

Signalling by TGF-beta family members: short-range effects of Xnr-2 and BMP-4 contrast with the long-range effects of activin.

BACKGROUND: One way of establishing a morphogen gradient in a developing embryo involves the localized synthesis of an inducing molecule followed by its diffusion into surrounding tissues. The morphogen-like effects of the mesoderm-inducing factor activin provide support for this idea in amphibian development. The questions remain, however, of how activin exerts its long-range effects, and whether long-range signalling is a property of all transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) family members. RESULTS: We compare the signalling ranges of activin and two other TGF-beta family members, Xnr-2 and BMP-4. Unlike activin, Xnr-2 and BMP-4 act over short distances. Furthermore, the effects of constitutively active activin receptors are strictly cell-autonomous. These observations suggest that the long-range effects of activin occur through protein diffusion and that "relay' mechanisms are not initiated by any of these TGF-beta family members. Mechanisms limiting the signalling range of Xnr-2 were addressed by studying Xnr-2 processing and secretion. An activin-Xnr-2 fusion protein signals over many cell diameters, suggesting that regulated processing or secretion is one limiting factor. Disaggregation and reaggregation of Xnr-2-producing tissues also extends the range of Xnr-2, suggesting that components of intact tissue restrict spread of the protein. CONCLUSIONS: The long-range effects of activin are likely to occur through the diffusion of activin protein. The short-range effects of Xnr-2 and BMP-4 emphasize that long-range diffusion is not a general property of TGF-beta-related molecules. Finally, signalling ranges may be regulated by constraints on processing or secretion and by interactions with extracellular components of embryonic tissues.

Activin Receptors, Type I↗

Transforming growth factor-beta 3 is required for secondary palate fusion.

Mice lacking TGF-beta 3 exhibit an incompletely penetrant failure of the palatal shelves to fuse leading to cleft palate. The defect appears to result from impaired adhesion of the apposing medial edge epithelia of the palatal shelves and subsequent elimination of the mid-line epithelial seam. No craniofacial abnormalities were observed. This result demonstrates that TGF-beta 3 affects palatal shelf fusion by an intrinsic, primary mechanism rather than by effects secondary to craniofacial defects.

Animals↗

Developmental effects of ectopic expression of the glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding domain are alleviated by an amino acid substitution that interferes with homeodomain binding.

Steroid hormone receptors are distinguished from other members of the nuclear hormone receptor family through their association with heat shock proteins and immunophilins in the absence of ligands. Heat shock protein association represses steroid receptor DNA binding and protein-protein interactions with other transcription factors and facilitates hormone binding. In this study, we investigated the hormone-dependent interaction between the DNA binding domain (DBD) of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and the POU domains of octamer transcription factors 1 and 2 (Oct-1 and Oct-2, respectively). Our results indicate that the GR DBD binds directly, not only to the homeodomains of Oct-1 and Oct-2 but also to the homeodomains of several other homeodomain proteins. As these results suggest that the determinants for binding to the GR DBD are conserved within the homeodomain, we examined whether the ectopic expression of GR DBD peptides affected early embryonic development. The expression of GR DBD peptides in one-cell-stage zebra fish embryos severely affected their development, beginning with a delay in the epibolic movement during the blastula stage and followed by defects in convergence-extension movements during gastrulation, as revealed by the abnormal patterns of expression of several dorsal gene markers. In contrast, embryos injected with mRNA encoding a GR peptide with a point mutation that disrupted homeodomain binding or with mRNA encoding the DBD of the closely related mineralocorticoid receptor, which does not bind octamer factors, developed normally. Moreover, coinjection of mRNA encoding the homeodomain of Oct-2 completely rescued embryos from the effects of the GR DBD. These results highlight the potential of DNA-independent effects of GR in a whole-animal model and suggest that at least some of these effects may result from direct interactions with homeodomain proteins.

Animals↗

Cellular interpretation of multiple TGF-beta signals: intracellular antagonism between activin/BVg1 and BMP-2/4 signaling mediated by Smads.

During early embryogenesis of Xenopus, dorsoventral polarity of the mesoderm is established by dorsalizing and ventralizing agents, which are presumably mediated by the activity of an activin/BVg1-like protein and Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMP), respectively. Interestingly, these two TGF-beta subfamilies are found in overlapping regions during mesoderm patterning. This raises the question of how the presumptive mesodermal cells recognize the multiple TGF-beta signals and differentially interpret this information to assign a particular cell fate. In this study, we have exploited the well characterized model of Xenopus mesoderm induction to determine the intracellular interactions between BMP-2/4 and activin/BVg1 signaling cascades. Using a constitutively active BMP-2/4 receptor that transduces BMP-2/4 signals in a ligand-independent fashion, we demonstrate that signals provided by activin/BVg1 and BMP modulate each other's activity and that this crosstalk occurs through intracellular mechanisms. In assays using BMP-2/4 and activin/BVg1-specific reporters, we determined that the specificity of BMP-2/4 and activin/BVg1 signaling is mediated by Smad1 and Smad2, respectively. These Smads should be considered as the mediators of the intracellular antagonism between BMP-2/4 and activin/BVg1 signaling possibly through sequestration of a limited pool of Smad4. Consistent with such a mechanism, Smad4 interacts functionally with both Smad1 and -2 to potentiate their signaling activities, and a dominant negative variant of Smad4 can inhibit both activin/BVg1 and BMP-2/4 mediated signaling Finally, we demonstrate that an activin/BVg1-dependent transcriptional complex contains both Smad2 and Smad4 and thereby provides a physical basis for the functional involvement of both Smads in TGF-beta-dependent transcriptional regulation. Thus, Smad4 plays a central role in synergistically activating activin/BVg1 and BMP-dependent transcription and functions as an intracellular sensor for TGF-beta-related signals.

Activins↗

Hydra constitutively expresses transcripts involved in vertebrate neural differentiation.

The diploblastic Hydra is among the most primitive multicellular organisms. Using cross-hybridization with Xenopus probes, noggin-like transcripts were detected in the hypostome and basal disc of adult Hydra (Pelmatohydra oligactis), regions with properties similar to that of the amphibian organizer. This points to the possibility of a close molecular similarity between the Xenopus and Hydra organizers. The constitutive expression of a noggin-like gene in Hydra may be responsible for its regenerative capacity.

Animals↗

Molecular mechanisms of Spemann's organizer formation: conserved growth factor synergy between Xenopus and mouse.

Mesoderm induction assays in Xenopus have implicated growth factors such as activin, Vg1, Xwnt-8, and noggin as important in directing the formation of dorsal mesoderm (Spemann's organizer). Because these growth factors are structurally very different, they presumably act through distinct cell surface receptors that initiate different intracellular signaling cascades. A consequence of all of these signaling pathways, however, seems to be the induction of goosecoid (gsc) gene expression. To understand how integration of these different signaling pathways results in formation of Spemann's organizer, we sought to identify growth factor-responsive elements within the gsc promoter. Through microinjection of reporter genes we have identified two cis-acting elements, a distal element (DE) and a proximal element (PE), that are required for activin/BVg1 and Wnt induction, respectively. We have shown that the DE mediates activin induction in the absence of protein synthesis and therefore constitutes the first activin response element identified to interpret transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily member signaling directly. Using a reporter gene construct containing a multimerized DE, we find that an activin/BVg1-type signaling cascade is active throughout the vegetal hemisphere and marginal zone but not in the animal hemisphere. We demonstrate further that both the distal and proximal elements are essential for high-level transcription of the gsc gene, specifically in dorsal mesoderm, strongly suggesting that establishment of Spemann's organizer requires synergistic input from activin/BVg1-like and Wnt signaling pathways. Finally, mechanisms of establishing the organizer are likely to be conserved throughout vertebrate evolution.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Drosophila goosecoid participates in neural development but not in body axis formation.

In vertebrate embryos, the homeobox gene goosecoid (gsc) is expressed in the gastrula organizer region and in later arising embryonic tissues including the foregut anlage. Ectopic expression and loss-of-function studies have demonstrated that Xenopus gsc elicits a dorsalizing activity that contributes to body axis formation. Here we report that the gsc gene is conserved in invertebrates. In Drosophila, D-gsc is expressed most strongly in the foregut anlage, which gives rise to the foregut proper and the stomatogastric nervous system (SNS). D-gsc expression overlaps with one of the three SNS precursor groups invaginating from the foregut anlage. Embryos mutant for D-gsc gastrulate normally but show disrupted invagination in the SNS primordium and lack one specific SNS ganglion. In addition, D-gsc mutant embryos show a less well defined defect in foregut arrangement. Our results indicate that this invertebrate homolog of gsc is not required for gastrulation but plays a role in neurogenesis in post-gastrula Drosophila embryos.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Axis-inducing activities and cell fates of the zebrafish organizer.

We have investigated axis-inducing activities and cellular fates of the zebrafish organizer using a new method of transplantation that allows the transfer of both deep and superficial organizer tissues. Previous studies have demonstrated that the zebrafish embryonic shield possesses classically defined dorsal organizer activity. When we remove the morphologically defined embryonic shield, embryos recover and are completely normal by 24 hours post-fertilization. We find that removal of the morphological shield does not remove all goosecoid- and floating head-expressing cells, suggesting that the morphological shield does not comprise the entire organizer region. Complete removal of the embryonic shield and adjacent marginal tissue, however, leads to a loss of both prechordal plate and notochord. In addition, these embryos are cyclopean, show a significant loss of floor plate and primary motorneurons and display disrupted somite patterning. Motivated by apparent discrepancies in the literature we sought to test the axis-inducing activity of the embryonic shield. A previous study suggested that the shield is capable of only partial axis induction, specifically being unable to induce the most anterior neural tissues. Contrary to this study, we find shields can induce complete secondary axes when transplanted into host ventral germ-ring. In induced secondary axes donor tissue contributes to notochord, prechordal plate and floor plate. When explanted shields are divided into deep and superficial fragments and separately transplanted we find that deep tissue is able to induce the formation of ectopic axes with heads but lacking posterior tissues. We conclude that the deep tissue included in our transplants is important for proper head formation.

Animals↗

Distribution of dorsal-forming activity in precleavage embryos of the Japanese newt, Cynops pyrrhogaster: effects of deletion of vegetal cytoplasm, UV irradiation, and lithium treatment.

Two types of axis-deficient embryos developed after deletion of the vegetal cytoplasm: wasp-shaped embryos and permanent-blastula-type embryos. In situ hybridization revealed that neither type of axis-deficient embryo expressed goosecoid or pax-6. brachyury was expressed in the constricted waist region of the wasp-shaped embryos but was not expressed in the permanent-blastula-type embryos. Further, we examined the effect of UV irradiation on Japanese newt embryos. Surprisingly, UV-irradiated Japanese newt eggs formed hyperdorsalized embryos. These embryos gastrulated in an irregular circular fashion with goosecoid expression in the circular equatorial region. At tailbud stage, these embryos formed a proboscis which is very reminiscent of that formed in hyperdorsalized Xenopus embryos. Transplantation of the marginal region of the UV-irradiated embryos revealed that the entire marginal zone had organizer activity. Thus we conclude that UV hyperdorsalizes Japanese newt embryos. Finally, lithium treatment of normal embryos at the 32-cell stage also resulted in hyperdorsalization. Lithium treatment of vegetally deleted embryos had two distinct results. Lithium treatment of permanent-blastula-type embryos did not result in the formation of dorsal axial structures, while the same treatment reinduced gastrulation and dorsal axis formation in the wasp-shaped embryos. Based on these results, we propose a model for early axis specification in Japanese newt embryos. The model presented here is fundamentally identical to the Xenopus model, with some important modifications. The vegetally located determinants required for dorsal development (dorsal determinants, DDs) are distributed over a wider region at fertilization in Japanese newt embryos than in Xenopus embryos. The marginal region of the Japanese newt embryo at the beginning of development overlaps with the field of the DDs. Gastrulation is very likely to be a dorsal marginal-specific property, while self-constriction is most probably a ventral marginal-specific property in Japanese newt embryos.

Animals↗

Mesodermal patterning by an inducer gradient depends on secondary cell-cell communication.

BACKGROUND: Gradients of inducing molecules, or morphogens, could impose pattern on early embryos. Although there are candidates for morphogens in several systems, it is not well understood how cells might translate differences in extracellular inducer concentration into an orderly arrangement of cell types. With this question in mind, we have re-examined mesodermal patterning in Xenopus in response to the secreted growth factor activin. Previous work has shown that activin can initiate the formation of a variety of mesodermal tissues in a concentration-dependent fashion. We have sought to disentangle the roles played by individual cell responses to activin and subsequent interactions among induced cells in producing this outcome. RESULTS: We find that the initial response of dispersed cells to activin concentration is unexpectedly simple, showing neither the thresholds of activin concentration nor the distinct domains of gene expression that characterize the later response. The eventual emergence of an ordered series of coherent differentiation steps requires the reaggregation of the induced cells, implying that secondary interactions occur. Furthermore, when cells induced at different doses of activin are mixed, the final response apparently represents a consensus, rather than a mosaic, of the mixed populations. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that communication among responding cells underlies much of the remarkable patterning influence of activin. Moreover, we suggest that these findings can inform thinking about how inducer gradients might act in other systems, shifting emphasis from the initial response of cells to inducer concentration toward the elaboration of complex pattern by secondary interactions.

Actins↗

Inhibition of mesoderm formation by follistatin.

Mesoderm induction requires interaction between cells of the animal and vegetal hemispheres of the embryo. Several molecules have been proposed as candidates for mesoderm-inducing signals, with activin a particularly strong candidate. However, it has not been possible to inhibit mesoderm formation in vivo by specifically blocking activin action. Follistatin is able to inhibit the action of activin but not that of the mature region of Vg1, a member of the transforming growth factor beta family. Follistatin therefore provides a useful tool for distinguishing between signalling by these two factors. We have overexpressed Xenopus follistatin mRNA and analysed the expression of several mesodermal markers. Our results show an inhibition of mesodermal formation by follistatin in a concentration-dependent manner, showing the requirement of activin for mesodermal induction.

Animals↗

The interpretation of position in a morphogen gradient as revealed by occupancy of activin receptors.

Xenopus blastula cells activate different mesodermal genes as a concentration-dependent response to activin, which behaves like a morphogen. To understand how cells recognize morphogen concentration, we have bound naturally labeled activin to cells and related this to choice of gene activation. We find that the increasing occupancy of a single receptor type can cause cells to switch gene expression. Cells sense ligand concentration by the absolute number of occupied receptors per cell (100 and 300 molecules of bound activin induce Xbra and Xgsc, respectively, i.e., 2% and 6% of the total receptors) and not by a ratio of occupied to unoccupied receptors. The long duration of occupancy explains a previously described ratchet effect. Our results suggest a new concept of morphogen gradient formation and interpretation that is particularly well suited to the needs of early development.

Activin Receptors↗

Activin signalling and response to a morphogen gradient.

Using combinations of amphibian embryo tissues, it is shown that the selection of genes expressed by a cell is determined by its distance from a source of activin, a peptide growth factor contained in vegetal cells and able to induce other cells to form mesoderm. This long-range signal spreads over at least 10 cell diameters in a few hours. It does so by passive diffusion, because it can by-pass cells that do not themselves respond to the signal nor synthesize protein. These results provide direct support for the operation of a morphogen concentration gradient in vertebrate development.

Activins↗