Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Glutaminase”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Hepatic glutaminase expression: relationship to kidney-type glutaminase and to the urea cycle.

Glutamine functions as a major transport form of nitrogen and carbon within the body. In the liver, glutamine is hydrolyzed by a unique liver-type, phosphate-activated glutaminase, and the end products of hepatic glutamine catabolism are glucose and urea. Other tissues possess a different, kidney-type, glutaminase isozyme. The predicted amino acid sequences for the two glutaminases show a high degree of identity, indicating that they are products of different but related genes. Hepatic glutaminase activity is increased during diabetes, starvation, and on feeding high-protein diets, and decreased on feeding low-protein diets, whereas renal glutaminase appears to be regulated only by changes in acid-base status. Changes in the rate of gene transcription are the principal mechanism responsible for the long-term regulation of hepatic glutaminase, but the renal enzyme is regulated at the level of mRNA turnover. The pattern of regulation of hepatic glutaminase parallels that seen for genes encoding key enzymes of gluconeogenesis and urea synthesis, and indicates coordinate regulation of expression in keeping with the role of hepatic glutamine catabolism in these pathways.

Animals↗

Molecular cloning of a cDNA for rat hepatic glutaminase. Sequence similarity to kidney-type glutaminase.

Mammalian liver possesses a unique isozyme of phosphate-activated glutaminase which plays an important role in the regulation of glutamine catabolism. Antibodies to hepatic glutaminase were used to screen a lambda gt11 rat liver cDNA library. One cDNA to hepatic glutaminase was identified. Changes in the relative abundance of hepatic glutaminase mRNA were determined by hybridization to this cDNA. The mRNA is found only in liver; it is not present prior to birth but its abundance increases dramatically at birth. The abundance of the mRNA is increased approximately 4-fold in diabetes. The sequence of the cDNA was compared to that recently published for kidney (brain)-type glutaminase (Banner, C., Hwang, J.-J., Shapiro, R.A., Wenthold, R.J., Nakatani, Y., Lampel, K.A., Thomas, J.W., Huie, D., and Curthoys, N.P. (1988) Mol. Brain Res. 3, 247-254). When the predicted amino acid sequences were compared a region of 123 amino acids with greater than 80% identity was found. The presence of scattered amino acid substitutions within stretches of identical amino acids suggests that the glutaminase isozymes are encoded by separate genes. This is the first demonstration of any similarity between the two glutaminases at the molecular level.

Aging↗

Response of rat liver glutaminase to pH, ammonium, and citrate. Possible regulatory role of glutaminase in ureagenesis.

Liver glutaminase is stimulated by an increase in NH4+ concentration and NH4+ is an absolute requirement for activity at approximate physiological concentrations of phosphate and glutamine. Increases in the concentration of NH4+ cannot, however, overcome the inhibitory effect of a decrease in pH. In addition, the concentration of NH4+ required for half-maximal rate decreases as pH increases. This decrease is the result of two factors: a direct effect of pH on the apparent affinity of the enzyme for NH4+, and an indirect effect of pH brought about by an increase in the apparent affinity of the enzyme for phosphate which results in a further decrease in the M0.5 for NH4+. In addition, liver glutaminase responds strongly to the concentration of citrate over a physiologically relevant range at approximate physiological concentrations of NH4+, phosphate, and glutamine. An increase in citrate concentration stimulates glutaminase by increasing the affinity of the enzyme for glutamine. The apparent affinity of the enzyme for citrate increases as pH increases. The strong response of liver glutaminase to pH, NH4+, and citrate and the fact that the hydrolysis of glutamine can supply metabolites and effectors for urea synthesis suggest a possible regulatory role of glutaminase in ureagenesis.

Ammonia↗

[13N]Ammonia and L-[amide-13N]glutamine metabolism in glutaminase-sensitive and glutaminase-resistant murine tumors.

The short-term metabolic fate of labeled nitrogen derived from [13N]ammonia or from L-[amide-13N]glutamine was determined in murine tumors known to be resistant (Ridgeway Osteogenic Sarcoma (ROS] or sensitive (Sarcoma-180 (S-180)) to glutaminase therapy. At 5 min after intraperitoneal injection of [13N]ammonia or of L-[amide-13N]glutamine, only about 0.7% of the label recovered in both tumors was in protein and nucleic acid. After [13N]ammonia administration, most of the label (over 80%) was in a metabolized form; a large portion of this metabolized label (50-57%) was in the urea fraction with a smaller amount in glutamine (37-42%). The major short-term fate of label derived from L-[amide-13N]glutamine was incorporation into components of the urea cycle with smaller amounts in the acidic metabolites and in acidic amino acids. No labeled urea was found during in vitro studies in which S-180 tumor slices were incubated with [13N]ammonia, suggesting that the [13N]urea formed in the tumor in the in vivo experiments was not due to de novo synthesis through carbamyl phosphate in the tumor. Both tumors exhibited very low glutamine synthetase activity. Following glutaminase treatment, glutamine synthetase and gamma-glutamyltransferase activities, while remaining low, increased in the resistant tumor but not in the sensitive tumor; this increase may be related to the insensitivity of the ROS tumor toward glutaminase treatment.

Amino Acids↗

Regional differences in glutaminase activation by phosphate and calcium in rat brain: impairment in aged rats and implications for regional glutaminase isozymes.

Regional regulation of glutaminase by phosphate and calcium was examined in the temporal cortex (TCX), striatum (STR) and hippocampus (HIPP) from adult and aged male F344 rats. Phosphate-dependent glutaminase activity in adult rats was significantly lower (35-43%) in the HIPP (100 and 150 mM) and STR (150 mM) compared to PAG activity in the TCX. Phosphate activation in aged rats was 50-60% lower in the HIPP at concentrations greater than 25 mM compared to the aged TCX or STR. PAG activity in the TCX and STR was unaffected by age, but was significantly reduced (30-50%) in the HIPP from aged rats at phosphate concentrations of 25 mM and greater when compared to adult rats. In adult rats at concentrations of CaCl2 above 1 mM, PAG activity was significantly lower (60-75%) in the STR and HIPP when compared to the TCX. In aged rats, PAG activity (1 mM CaCl2) in the HIPP was significantly less (50%) than STR PAG activity in aged rats. Diminished PAG activity was seen only in the TCX (2.5 mM; 32%), and the HIPP (0.5 mM; 25% and 1 mM; 38%) at higher calcium concentrations compared to adult. Phosphate-independent calcium activation of PAG occurred in the HIPP but not in either the TCX or the STR. Addition of phosphate resulted in a synergistic activation of PAG in the STR and TCX, but not in the HIPP. These findings suggest that PAG is regionally regulated by phosphate and calcium, and this regulation is impaired in aged rats. These data also support the hypothesis that isozymes of PAG exist with different regulatory properties.

Aging↗

Glutaminase-positive and glutaminase-negative pyramidal cells in layer VI of the primary motor and somatosensory cortices: a combined analysis by intracellular staining and immunocytochemistry in the rat.

Pyramidal neurons in layer VI of the primary motor and somatosensory cortices were examined by a combined method of intracellular recording, biocytin injection, and immunocytochemistry using in vitro slice preparations of rat brain immunofluorescence staining revealed that biocytin-injected pyramidal cells in layer VI were separated into glutaminase (PAG)-immunopositive and PAG-immunonegative cells. Although the two groups of pyramidal cells showed no statistically significant differences in passive membrane properties and spike characteristics, a clear difference was found in spike afterpotentials. Ten of 12 PAG-positive pyramidal cells showed no or a small fast afterhyperpolarization (fAHP), whereas 10 of 11 PAG-negative pyramidal cells displayed a large fAHP. Depolarizing afterpotentials were observed only in PAG-positive pyramidal cells than in PAG-negative cells. In contrast, the arborization of basal dendrites was more developed in PAG-positive pyramidal cells than in PAG-negative cells. The main axons of all the pyramidal cells entered the subcortical axons of all the pyramidal cells entered the subcortical white matter. The local axon collaterals of PAG-positive pyramidal cells were widely spread in the horizontal direction, whereas those of PAG-negative cells were distributed vertically along the dendritic tree. Since PAG is considered to be a marker of glutamatergic neurons in the cerebral cortex, the present results indicate that layer VI pyramidal cells are separated into glutamatergic and nonglutamatergic neurons that have different electrical properties and input-output organizations. Thus, cortical outputs from layer VI are suggested to use at least two distinct systems.

Animals↗

Mosaic distribution of phosphate-activated glutaminase-like immunoreactivity in the rat striatum.

The dorsal and ventral striatum of mammals has been known to be organized in a mosaic manner, referred to as "patches" and "matrix" of the caudatoputamen. The present study was primarily attempted in order to reveal the relationship of glutamatergic neuronal components to the mosaic organization in the rat striatum by using a monoclonal antibody to phosphate-activated glutaminase, a major synthetic enzyme of transmitter glutamate. Antibodies against glutamate decarboxylase and choline acetyltransferase were also used as the markers for GABAergic and cholinergic neuronal components, respectively. Glutaminase immunoreactivity was seen in a number of large- and a few medium-sized neurons in the caudatoputamen, nucleus accumbens and olfactory tubercle. The large neurons with glutaminase immunoreactivity were observed in the neuropil of the caudatoputamen and nucleus accumbens; glutaminase immunoreactivity was particularly marked in the neuropil of island-like patchy areas although it was seen throughout the neuropil of the nuclei. In the caudatoputamen, island-like areas with marked glutaminase immunoreactivity exhibited less marked choline acetyltransferase immunoreactivity than the surrounding background region, and were thus considered to correspond to the patches. The mosaic distribution of glutamate decarboxylase immunoreactivity in the caudatoputamen seemed identical with that of glutaminase immunoreactivity. However, in the nucleus accumbens, the mosaic pattern of neuropil labeling for glutaminase was neither consistent with that for glutamate decarboxylase nor that for choline acetyltransferase, suggesting the presence of non-GABAergic glutaminase-containing nerve terminals in the nucleus. In an attempt to clarify the origin of neuropil labeling for glutaminase in the striatum, lesions were made in the regions sending projection fibers to the caudatoputamen and nucleus accumbens. After placing lesions in the cerebral cortex, glutaminase immunoreactivity was decreased in neuropil of the caudatoputamen, but the mosaic pattern remained. Lesions which were placed in the intralaminar thalamic nuclei, amygdaloid body, globus pallidus or substantia nigra produced no substantial change in glutaminase immunoreactivity in the caudatoputamen and nucleus accumbens. After injection of kainic acid into the caudatoputamen or nucleus accumbens, glutaminase immunoreactivity in the neuropil of the affected regions was decreased to lose the mosaic pattern, indicating that neuronal components with glutaminase immunoreactivity in the neuropil of the patches were mainly of intrinsic origin. In summary, possible axon terminals containing glutaminase were observed with mosaic patterns in the caudatoputamen and nucleus accumbens, in which large cholinergic and medium-sized non-cholinergic neurons were immunoreactive for glutaminase. In the caudatoputamen, glutaminase immunoreactivity in neuropil was more marked in the patches than in the matrix.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗

Digestion by serine proteases enhances salt tolerance of glutaminase in the marine bacterium Micrococcus luteus K-3.

Salt-tolerant glutaminase (Micrococcus glutaminase, with an apparent molecular mass of 48.3 kDa, intact glutaminase) from the marine bacterium Micrococcus luteus K-3 was digested using protease derived from M. luteus K-3. The digestion products were a large fragment (apparent molecular mass of 38.5 kDa, the glutaminase fragment) and small fragments (apparent molecular mass of 8 kDa). The digestion was inhibited by phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). Digestion of intact glutaminase by serine proteases including trypsin, elastase, lysyl endopeptidase, and arginylendopeptidase also produced the glutaminase fragment. The N-terminus of the glutaminase fragment was the same as that of intact glutaminase. The N-termini of two small fragments were Ala394 and Ala396, respectively. The enzymological and kinetic properties of the glutaminase fragment were almost the same as those of intact glutaminase except for salt-tolerant behavior. The glutaminase fragment was a higher salt-tolerant enzyme than the intact glutaminase, suggesting that Micrococcus glutaminase is digested in the C-terminal region by serine protease from M. luteus K-3 to confer salt tolerance on glutaminase.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Evidence for compartmentation of synaptosomal phosphate-activated glutaminase.

Phosphate-activated glutaminase (EC 3.5.1.2) in synaptosomal preparations is inhibited 40-60% by the sulphydryl group reagent N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), forming the basis for distinction between NEM-sensitive and NEM-insensitive glutaminases. The NEM effect cannot be explained by differential effects on distinct glutaminases because other glutaminases have not been detected, and the synaptosomal glutaminase activity can be fully accounted for by the activity of phosphate-activated glutaminase. By fractionation of mitochondria isolated from synaptosomal preparations, which are preincubated with and without NEM, both NEM-sensitive and NEM-insensitive glutaminases are found to be localized to the inner mitochondrial membrane. Variations in pH (7.0-7.6) and the phosphate concentration (5-10 mM) affect chiefly NEM-sensitive glutaminase, demonstrating that this glutaminase may be subject to regulation by compounds in the cytosol having restricted permeability to the inner mitochondrial membrane. Since p-hydroxymercuribenzoate, which is known to be impermeable to the inner mitochondrial membrane, inhibits glutaminase similarly to NEM, phosphate-activated glutaminase is assumed to be compartmentalized within the inner mitochondrial membrane. Thus, NEM-sensitive glutaminase is localized to the outer face and NEM-insensitive glutaminase to the inner region of this membrane and probably also to the matrix region.

Animals↗

Hepatic glutaminase gene expression in the tumor-bearing rat.

UNLABELLED: Previous studies have documented an increase in hepatic plasma membrane glutamine transport in the tumor-bearing rat, but the effects of tumor burden on hepatic glutaminase expression have not been carefully studied. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of tumor burden and food intake on hepatic glutaminase expression. Rats were implanted with syngeneic methylcholanthrene-induced fibrosarcoma tumor tissue; control rats were sham operated and pair-fed every 24 hr. Northern blotting was used to assay the effect of tumor burden and fasting on hepatic glutaminase mRNA levels, using beta-actin mRNA as a control. Hepatic glutaminase mRNA levels in livers of pair-fed controls were found to be 4-fold greater than levels in livers of tumor-bearing animals. Examination of food intake patterns in these animals indicated that pair-fed controls ate their allotted chow quickly while tumor-bearing rats ate small amounts throughout each 24 hr period. This observation suggested that the differences in glutaminase mRNA levels may be due to a period of fasting by pair-fed animals which was not experienced by the tumor-bearing group. Hepatic glutaminase mRNA levels rapidly increased in normal rats during acute fasting to levels 5.5-fold greater than fed animals. Glucose feeding and insulin injection rapidly reversed the effect of fasting on hepatic glutaminase mRNA levels in normal rats. Tumor-bearing rats also exhibited upregulation of hepatic glutaminase mRNA levels in response to fasting. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Tumor burden itself does not alter hepatic glutaminase expression, at least at the pre-translational level. Instead, differences in hepatic glutaminase mRNA content are due to differences in food intake patterns. (2) Hepatic glutaminase mRNA levels are rapidly upregulated in response to fasting, an effect which appears to be linked to a decrease in plasma insulin concentrations. Because tumor-bearing rats eat regularly over a 24 hr period (albeit in small increments), thereby maintaining the plasma insulin concentration, hepatic glutaminase mRNA may not rise as it does in pair-fed controls whose daily chow intake is complete within hours of food allocation. (3) This study indicates that differences in the timing of food intake between tumor-bearing rats and pair-fed controls can alter the expression of genes that are influenced by nutrient availability. These differences should be taken into account when designing studies which involve pair-feeding to control nutrient intake.

Acute Disease↗