Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Gift Giving”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The notion of gift-giving and organ donation.

The analogy between gift-giving and organ donation was first suggested at the beginning of the transplantation era, when policy makers and legislators were promoting voluntary organ donation as the preferred procurement procedure. It was believed that the practice of gift-giving had some features which were also thought to be necessary to ensure that an organ procurement procedure would be morally acceptable, namely voluntarism and altruism. Twenty-five years later, the analogy between gift-giving and organ donation is still being made in the literature and used in organ donation awareness campaigns. In this paper I want to challenge this analogy. By examining a range of circumstances in which gift-giving occurs, I argue that the significant differences between the various types of gift-giving and organ donation makes any analogy between the two very general and superficial, and I suggest that a more appropriate analogy can be found elsewhere.

Altruism↗

Reproductive gifts and gift giving: the altruistic woman.

Reproductive gift relationships must be seen in their totality, not just as helping someone have a child. Noncommercial surrogacy cannot be treated as a mere act of altruism--any valorizing of altruistic surrogacy and reproductive gift-giving must be assessed within the wider context of women's political inequality.

Altruism↗

"You don't give me flowers anymore": an analysis of gift-giving to medical and psychiatric inpatients.

BACKGROUND: If someone is admitted to hospital, it is customary for them to receive gifts from their friends and relatives. To assess the degree to which the mentally ill receive this type of support, this study set out to assess the level of gift-giving to the mentally ill compared with the physically ill during hospital admissions. METHOD: Subjects were 33 psychiatric and 23 medical female inpatients. Assessment was with a short interview on the subject of gifts received. Confounders were controlled for, in particular the number of family members who knew of the admission. RESULTS: Medical patients received significantly more flowers: odds ratio 8.8 (95% confidence interval 1.6-64.2, P = 0.004); get-well-soon cards: OR 5.7 (95% CI 1.4-25.3, P = 0.006) and other gifts: OR 5.7 (95% CI 1.4-23.6, P = 0.004). Adjustment for the potential confounders did not significantly affect the associations. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that during hospital admissions, the behaviour of relatives and friends of mentally ill patients is rejecting. The authors suggest that more education for relatives may help to improve this picture.

Adult↗

Gift-giving among gay men: the reification of social relations.

Previous work on gift-giving has shown the economic and social importance of this activity, ways in which it may reflect social relations, and characteristics of good and bad gift exchanges. This study examined gay gift-giving experiences to determine whether some of the propositions based almost exclusively on heterosexual data needed reinterpretation to be relevant to the homosexual community. It was found that, compared to previous research on gift-giving between heterosexual partners, gay males devoted more attention to selection or creation of gifts and they were also more concerned about the recipient's appreciation and utilization of the gift. On the other hand, they were less concerned with economic equity in the exchange process. These findings have implications for products offered as gifts as well as gift promotions that would be most suitable for this market.

Adolescent↗

Tips, status and sacrifice: gift giving in the doctor-patient relationship.

This study examines the gifts physicians receive from their patients. Internists in a hospital-based group practice kept diaries of gifts received and were interviewed about their responses and the reasons which they ascribed to the patient's gift-giving. It describes how physicians avoid reciprocating, categorizes the nature of gifts and, for the special instance of manipulative gifts, how these may be defused. Patient gifts are found to be reciprocations for some action on the part of the physician, which the patient, in turn, perceives as a gift. Three categories of gifts, according to their nature and timing, are: (1) gifts as 'tips', given to promote personalized service, to assure the continued interest and the tolerance of the physician; (2) gifts to address the status imbalance in the doctor-patient relationship, either by imposing a non-professional identity on the physician or by redeeming status lost in the sick role; (3) gifts as a sacrifice to the physician who exercises his power on the patient's behalf.

Age Factors↗

Pharmaceutical gift giving: analysis of an ethical dilemma.

When pharmaceutical companies market their products to, and through, healthcare professionals in hospitals and private practice, healthcare professionals face ethical dilemmas in their practice and their organizations. Pharmaceutical companies target nurse practitioners with prescribing privileges. The author describes the ethical dilemma faced by healthcare professionals when friendly salespeople offer tempting gifts. The article outlines cultural responses to gift giving and ethical issues surrounding healthcare professionals' responses to pharmaceutical marketing strategies. Nurse administrators need to acknowledge a growing threat to nursing integrity. Nurse administrators have the power to make and enforce ethical policies that prevent proprietary influences from clouding nursing judgment and contributing to the escalating costs of prescription medications.

Choice Behavior↗

Mainstream legitimization of homosexual men through Valentine's Day gift-giving and consumption rituals.

Recently, the gay community has received increased attention from marketers through specially-made television commercials, direct mail pieces, and other media messages. However, little research in consumer behavior has examined the potential attitudinal and behavioral differences and similarities between heterosexuals and homosexuals. Specifically, this paper provides an exploratory look at the meaning and practices surrounding the consumer ritual of Valentine's Day from the perspective of homosexual men. Using depth interviews within an interpretative framework, our research suggests similarities exist for the celebration of Valentine's Day between homosexual and heterosexual singles, while differences may exist for the functions of Valentine's Day gift-giving between these groups. Some homosexual couples feel they cannot "legitimately participate" in the dominant rituals associated with the holiday due to oppression by a "heterosexual society". Marketing implications are discussed.

Adult↗

Gift-giving or influence peddling: can you tell the difference?

Physical therapists are faced with an ever-increasing array of advertising ventures, "free" gifts, and enticing offers from equipment and supply companies and various health care agencies. Concerns are raised about the ethical implications of gift exchange in professional activities. Basic motives governing gift exchange are examined from a sociological standpoint. The obligation of the professional to act in the best interest of the patient and to guard against the impression of impropriety to the public is paramount in decisions concerning gifts. Opinions from the medical and pharmaceutical professions are explored to glean criteria that have applicability to physical therapy. These criteria are presented in the form of questions that may be helpful for physical therapists.

Advertising↗