Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Geriatrics”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Geriatric medicine fellowship programs: a national study from the Association of Directors of Geriatric Academic Programs' Longitudinal Study of Training and Practice in Geriatric Medicine.

This report documents the development and growth of geriatric medicine fellowship training in the United States through 2002. A cross-sectional survey of geriatric medicine fellowship programs was conducted in the fall 2001. All allopathic (119) and osteopathic (7) accredited geriatric medicine fellowship-training programs in the United States were involved. Data were collected using self-administered mailed and Web-based survey instruments. Longitudinal data from the American Medical Association (AMA) and the Association of American Medical Colleges' (AAMC) National Graduate Medical Education (GME) Census, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), and the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) were also analyzed. The survey instrument was designed to gather data about faculty, fellows, program curricula, and program directors (PDs). In addition, annual AMA/AAMC data from 1991 to the present was compiled to examine trends in the number of fellowship programs and the number of fellows. The overall survey response rate was 76% (96 of 126 PDs). Most (54%) of the PDs had been in their current position 4 or more years (range: <1-20 years), and 59% of PDs reported that they had completed formal geriatric medicine fellowship training. The number of fellowship programs and the number of fellows entering programs has slowly increased over the past decade. During 2001-02, 338 fellows were training in allopathic programs and seven in osteopathic programs (all years of training). Forty-six percent (n = 44) of responding programs offered only 1-year fellowship-training experiences. PDs reported that application rates for fellowship positions were stable during the academic years (AYs) 1999-2002, with the median number of applications per first year position available in AY 2000-01 being 10 (range: 1-77). In 2001-02, data from the AMA/AAMC National GME Census indicated a fill rate for first-year geriatric medicine fellowship positions of 69% (259 first-year fellows for 373 positions). During 2001-02, more than half of programs (53%) reported having two or fewer first-year fellows, whereas 31% had three or four first-year fellows. Thirty-three programs (36%) reported having no U.S. medical school graduate first-year fellows, and another 25 (28%) reported having only one. Of the 51 programs offering second-year fellowship training, PDs reported 61 post-first-year fellows (median 1, range: 0-7). During the past 10 years, 27 new allopathic geriatric medicine fellowship programs opened; there are now 119 programs. There are also seven osteopathic programs. The recruitment of high-quality U.S. medical school graduates into these programs remains a challenge for the discipline. Furthermore, the retention of first-year fellows for additional years of academic training has been difficult. Incentives will be needed to attract the best graduates of U.S. family practice and internal medicine training programs into academic careers in geriatric medicine.

Career Choice↗
PubMed1999

[The Geriatric Minimum Data Set (Gemidas) of the Federal Association of Clinical Geriatric Facilities e. V. as an instrument for quality assurance in inpatient geriatrics].

BACKGROUND: Geriatric medicine in Germany is faced with an increasing demand for continuous documentation and evaluation of its effectiveness and efficiency. Hence, the Federal Association (FA) of Clinical Geriatric Departments (Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft der Klinisch-Geriatrischen Einrichtungen e.V.) has funded a working group on improving quality management in geriatrics by developing criteria for quality standards. METHODS: In 1996, the FA working group achieved consensus on the definition of the Geriatric Minimum Data Set (Gemidas) which covered (i) core information about a patient's age, sex, living arrangement, and (ii) basic characteristics of the hospital course such as location prior to admission and past discharge, leading and accompanying diagnoses, newly prescribed technical aids, objective functional status on admission and at discharge (e.g., Barthel Index (BI), Timed Up & Go (TUG), and intensity of professional care (PPR)), as well as subjectively evaluated attainment of treatment goals. This initial report describes the instrument and presents analyses of its feasibility for routine clinical practice and data consistency. RESULTS: Twenty out of 27 hospitals (74%) integrated Gemidas successfully in daily routine, 75% of which (15 hospitals, total n = 10,567 patients) instantaneously collected data on constant numbers of patients per month. Multivariate regression analyses used to decompose variances of the instrument's central indicators (e.g., BI, TUG, PPR) revealed a satisfactory dimensionality and high consistency (e.g., covering 59% of variance in BI with 53% of variance uniquely attributable to patient characteristics), as well as sensitivity to differences between hospitals (e.g., 12% of variance in duration of stay uniquely attributable to hospital differences after controlling for patients' characteristics). CONCLUSION: Gemidas appears to be a feasible quality assurance instrument in geriatrics, suitable for compiling its data into a central registry database, which may then be used for analyses across and between hospitals. However, some modifications are still necessary and more detailed analyses needed, before final recommendations can be made.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Medicare reimbursement for geriatric assessment: report of the American Geriatrics Society Ad Hoc Committee on Geriatrics Assessment.

This ad hoc committee report from the American Geriatrics Society proposes the prompt initiation of Medicare reimbursement for geriatric assessment (GA) services (also termed comprehensive geriatric assessment or geriatric evaluation and management services). Despite an extensive body of literature documenting the effectiveness of GA for improving health care outcomes in many settings for identifiable groups of frail elderly patients, no explicit Medicare reimbursement mechanisms currently exist to cover GA services provided by either hospital or physician. We believe that new physician reimbursement codes specific for geriatric assessment should be established in the Current Procedural Technology (CPT-4) manual and that reimbursement for GA should be specifically provided under Part B of Medicare. Further, we believe that hospital reimbursement within the Medicare prospective payment system should be modified to encourage GA during inpatient stays for appropriate patients. This paper summarizes the background for these recommendations. It defines the major content of GA at three levels of intensity--screening, intermediate, and comprehensive. It describes the major sites for conducting GA--hospital, office, home, nursing home. Finally, it proposes criteria for targeting patients most likely to benefit from GA.

Aged↗
PubMed1983

[The specialty of geriatrics and geriatric education. Geriatrics and nursing home medicine; differences and similarities].

Modern definitions of geriatric medicine are based upon the central concept of homoiostasis. Starting from this concept, the goals, methods and provisions on behalf of geriatric patients in the Netherlands have been outlined. Likewise some arguments for the identity of the medicine of the nursing home are discussed. It is concluded, that medicine of the nursing home is basically the same as geriatric medicine, although there have grown differences as to the location where it is practiced. Assuming that the magnitude of geriatric problems will increase in the future for both disciplines, concerted action is recommended for geriatric medicine and medicine of the nursing home, specially regarding the proposed educations.

Aged↗
PubMed1981

Geriatric medical education: developments since the American Geriatrics Society Conferences on Geriatric Education, 1976-77.

This is a Report presented to and endorsed by the Board of Directors of the American Geriatrics Society (AGS). It deals with developments since the AGS Conferences on Geriatric Education, 1976-77. Summarized is the position adopted by various medical organizations and associations, including the Institute of Medicine, Federated Council for Internal Medicine, American Society of Internal Medicine, and the American Academy of Family Physicians. Their stances essentially agree with that described in the Proceedings of the 1976-77 Conferences (JAGS, November 1977). The consensus arising from discussions by organized medical groups is that creation of a new practice specialty is unnecessary, although development and maintenance of an academic cadre of teachers and researchers is essential. Called for is greater commitment at the medical school level to incorporate geriatrics into the curriculum. The Report also deals with the question of merited recognition for those with special competency or expanded training in geriatrics. Finally, the Report provides support for the Medical Director concept, and looks to the Society's new Section for Long-Term Care Physicians to provide leadership in emphasizing the role of the physician in long-term care. The AGS intends, through future reports, publications, conferences, and liaison relationships with other organizations, to continue this advance, seeking solutions designed to improve and extend the health care of the aging population.

Curriculum↗
PubMed1983

[The specialty of geriatrics and geriatric education. The origins and functions of a geriatric department in a general hospital].

In 1973 a geriatric ward was set up as part of the general hospital Hoog-Laren (now part of 'Gooi-Noord'). Its function is the examination, observation and medical treatment of elderly patients showing disordered behaviour. In this article we describe the history, goals, organization and methods/activities of this geriatric ward. Experience taught us that disordered behaviour of elderly patients is not a matter of mental illness, but arises in general as result of a disturbance of the somato-psychic-social equilibrium. Before it is possible to start a specific treatment, we try to determine the nature and extent of the disturbance by examining all known aspects of the somato-psychic-social equilibrium in a multidisciplinary manner. Then a therapeutic plan is designed and a recommendation for the future is given. Recently the activities were extended to include policlinical screening of patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1983

Zopiclone to geriatric patients. A parallel double-blind dose-response clinical trial of zopiclone as a hypnotic to geriatric patients - a study in a geriatric hospital.

Zopiclone was given for 14 nights to 68 geriatric patients (mean age 81 years) with sleep problems. The patients were randomly allocated to four treatment groups: 3.75 mg, 5.0, 7.5, or 10.0 mg of zopiclone. Sleep quantity and quality, side effects, and influence on psychomotor performance (digit symbol substitution and letter cancellation test) were studied before treatment, during active treatment, and after withdrawal of the drug. All patients slept better on zopiclone compared to placebo. There were only slight differences between the different dose levels as regards quantity and quality. No influence on psychomotor performance could be shown. The side effects were mild. Zopiclone showed a good hypnotic efficacy, and 7.5 mg is probably the best dose for elderly patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1982

Zopiclone to geriatric patients. A parallel double-blind dose-response clinical trial of zopiclone as a hypnotic to geriatric patients - a study in a geriatric hospital.

Zopiclone was given for 14 nights to 68 geriatric patients (mean age 81 years) with sleep problems. The patients were randomly allocated to four treatment groups: 3.75 mg, 5.0, 7.5, or 10.0 mg of zopiclone. Sleep quantity and quality, side effects, and influence on psychomotor performance (digit symbol substitution and letter cancellation test) were studied before treatment, during active treatment, and after withdrawal of the drug. All patients slept better on zopiclone compared to placebo. There were only slight differences between the different dose levels as regards quantity and quality. No influence on psychomotor performance could be shown. The side effects were mild. Zopiclone showed a good hypnotic efficacy, and 7.5 mg is probably the best dose for elderly patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

[Geriatric rehabilitation as an integral part of geriatric medicine in the nordic countries.].

OBJECTIVE: Firstly to outline the theoretical and practical framework for geriatric rehabilitation in Iceland and other Nordic countries and secondly to survey the scientific medical publications for evidence based geriatric rehabilitation. METHODS: Brain storming on geriatric rehabilitation in a working group of Nordic teachers in geriatric medicine. Papers on scientific programs for geriatric rehabilitation from Internet sources were collected and analyzed. All articles describing randomized studies in geriatric rehabilitation were selected for overview. The papers were divided into four groups according to diseases, infirmity and resource settings; 1) stroke, 2) hip-fractures, 3) acute admissions and 4) programs conducted in nursing homes, day hospitals and home services. RESULTS: A spectrum of biological and social events creates the conditions underlying most causes for illness and disability in old people. The process of established geriatric services promotes the efficiency of geriatric rehabilitation. The literature survey included 27 scientific studies (8586 patients) on randomized studies with valid endpoints. Geriatric rehabilitation programs for stroke patients in geriatric settings, six studies (1138 patients), reduced mortality and the need for nursing home placement but the outcome for ADL. Function and length of stay was more variable between the studies. The outcome of geriatric rehabilitation was even more decisive in the randomized hip-fracture studies, six studies (2171 patients). Eight studies were found comparing the outcome between acute admission of frail elderly to either geriatric (GEMU, GRU) or general medical wards. The outcome as regards to mortality rate at one year, placement to a nursing home, physical function, contentment with services, readmission rate and cost was all significantly better in the geriatric settings. Internal comparisons of geriatric programs in nursing homes, day hospitals and in home service, seven studies (1261 patient), revealed some differences in outcomes in function, contentment and costs. CONCLUSIONS: Specialized geriatric rehabilitation is complicated but effective when properly performed. Interdisciplinary teamwork, targeting of patients, comprehensive assessment and intensive and patient-targeted rehabilitation seem to characterize the most effective programs. Rehabilitation of frail elderly people poses a major challenge for the future and has to be developed further for the sake of quality of life of elderly people as well as for economic reasons.

English Abstract↗
PubMed1996

[University education in geriatrics. Present status and future plans of universities regarding the development of a program in geriatrics].

Because the number of people who reach an advanced age has been increasing at an unprecedented rate in Japan, geriatricians are expected to play a central role in health care for the elderly. However, only 16 out of 80 medical schools (20 percent) now have departments of geriatrics for undergraduate education. To develop undergraduate education in the field of geriatrics, a survey was sponsored by the Research Projects on Aging and Health (Health Science Research Grant the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan). A questionnaire regarding the present status and future plans of the university about a program in geriatrics, was sent to deans of medical faculties or vice-presidents of medical schools. The questionnaire included questions about current status and future plans regarding undergraduate geriatric education, the presence of a department or clinic of geriatrics, educational requirements in the field of geriatrics, opportunities for practice, institutions of practice, research on geriatrics, and other suggestions. The response rate was 93.7 percent (74/79). Departments or clinics of geriatrics had been established in 15 institutions (20.3 percent) and were planned in 18 (24.3 percent). Undergraduate education in geriatrics was considered necessary in 73 schools (98.7 percent) and indispensable as an obligatory subject in 56 (75.7 percent). Clinical practice was considered more important and effective than lectures in 50 schools (63.3 percent). Coordinated lectures on basic biomedical gerontology (such as mechanism of aging) and geriatric medicine for chronic degenerative diseases such as senile dementia were considered essential to the curriculum. In practicing geriatrics, experience in providing medical care to aged patients as well as social support and a welfare system for the aged is emphasized. Institutions, nursing homes, and geriatric hospitals outside medical schools be easily accessible. It was generally agreed that geriatrics should be taught in advanced classes. In conclusion, medical schools in Japan regard undergraduate education in geriatrics as necessary and agree on the optimal curriculum, but it is not universally implemented.

Education, Medical, Undergraduate↗
PubMed1996

Geriatric work-up in the Nordic countries. The Nordic approach to comprehensive geriatric assessment.

A group established by the Nordic professors of geriatrics has developed a position document presenting a shared and updated review of geriatric work-up as a way of comprehensive geriatric assessment in the Nordic countries. The main intention is that the document will serve as support and help for the clinician concerned with hospital based geriatric medicine. It may also be useful for quality control and teaching. Not least, it may be useful for health professionals other than geriatricians. To some extent, the position of geriatric medicine in the Nordic countries varies between the countries. However, the background for developing a Nordic version of geriatric work-up is shared attitudes and principally the same organization of the health care system, and collaboration within geriatrics for many years. Several trials on comprehensive geriatric assessment and management performed in different settings have shown favourable outcomes. Results from controlled Nordic trials are compiled and summaries of meta-analyses are presented. The concept of Nordic geriatric work-up is based on a model defining health and disease in old age as dimensions of pathology, impairments, functional limitations, and disability, all being modified by extra- and intraindividual factors. Handicap is defined as the disability gap. Different health professionals have varying responsibilities in the geriatric team-work, but all should be dedicated to establish common goals. The geriatric work-up is presented with success factors and barriers, stating important differences between multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary processes. Checklists and assessment scales may be very useful when performing a geriatric work-up, but they should be used with caution. Specific scales covering different functional areas of the geriatric patient are recommended for clinical practice. Such scales must be valid, reliable, acceptable to the patient, responsive to change, and should be in an appropriate format, as well as easy to administer. Prior to the use among geriatric teams in the Nordic countries the scales should be translated into all the Nordic languages, and the translated versions should ideally have been subjected to validity and reliability testing. However, so far no scale meets these demands regarding all the five Nordic languages.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

[Required competence in geriatrics in the view of the Competence Center for Geriatrics].

The geriatric patient is defined by a high specific risk that is taken into account by the special geriatric treatment concept. This risk relates to suffering from the permanent and significant loss of earlier functional independence caused by relatively trivial accessory conditions or other changes to the personal situation or falling in need of or increasing the need for care. It results from the geriatric patient's limited reserve capacities that are caused by physiological age-related limitations of organ and organ system reserves and/or manifested or at least latent functional impairments. A rather narrow definition of the geriatric patient based on this specific risk is a key criterion for the future systematic integration of geriatric care into the health service. In such a definition, use of the age component alone is adequate only from a very old age on. The high-risk group of geriatric patients narrowly defined in such a way also calls for primary medical geriatric case management: from commencement of a treatment throughout its entire course, from therapy to rehabilitation to longterm and outpatient care. This comprises first and foremost an comprehensive geriatric assessment and a treatment oriented primarily towards achieving quality of life and independence, medical treatment control including a systematic risk management system, continuous patient support, even in case of other temporary, specific treatments, the individual use of early rehabilitative treatments and the coordination of secondary treatment initiatives. Positioning geriatrics in the health care system in such a way means that the required skills extend beyond a general knowledge of geriatric medicine. Above all, high generic treatment expertise and experience in geriatric rehabilitation are also needed. Additionally, the guide and support function of the geriatrician demands a willingness to take special medical and ethical responsibility and an abundant ability to integrate and communicate. The education, training and development initiatives for attaining geriatric qualifications must satisfy these requirements. Lasting efficient geriatric care concepts also call for the appropriate skills in primary medical outpatient care.

Academies and Institutes↗
PubMed2003

Geriatric syndromes: medical misnomer or progress in geriatrics?

Both in geriatric and internal medicine journals, and in medical textbooks certain (aggregates of) symptoms are labelled as 'geriatric syndromes'. In frail elderly patients a large number of diseases present with well-known and highly prevalent atypical symptoms (e.g. immobility, instability, impaired cognition and incontinence), which are referred to as geriatric syndromes. While classically the term syndrome is used for grouping together multiple symptoms with a single pathogenetic pathway, geriatric syndrome primarily refers to one symptom or a complex of symptoms with high prevalence in geriatrics, resulting from multiple diseases and multiple risk factors. The geriatric workup should therefore consist of both a search for and treatment of the aetiologically related diseases and a risk factor assessment and reduction. Effectiveness and efficiency of this specific geriatric syndrome workup has been demonstrated predominantly for combinations of geriatric syndromes that often serve as targeting criteria for geriatric interventions, and for some specific geriatric syndromes. Therefore, we argue that the concept of geriatric syndromes is valuable as a theoretical frame, a directive for diagnostic analysis and as an educational tool in teaching geriatrics to medical students and trainees. Added to this, explaining the heterogeneous way 'syndrome' is used in current clinical practice, as opposed to 'disease', will also substantially improve clinical reasoning both in geriatrics and general internal medicine.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Geriatric rehabilitation as an integral part of geriatric medicine in the Nordic countries.

OBJECTIVES: First, to outline the theoretical and practical framework for geriatric rehabilitation in the Nordic countries and second, to survey the scientific medical publications for evidence-based geriatric rehabilitation. METHODS: Brainstorming on geriatric rehabilitation in a working group of Nordic teachers in geriatric medicine. Papers on scientific programmes for geriatric rehabilitation from Internet sources were collected and analyzed. All articles describing randomized studies in geriatric rehabilitation were selected for meta-analyses. The papers were divided into four groups according to diseases, infirmity and resource settings: stroke, hip-fractures, acute admissions and programmes conducted in nursing homes, day hospitals and home services. RESULTS: The literature survey included 30 scientific studies (9496 patients) in randomized trials with valid endpoints. Geriatric rehabilitation programmes for stroke patients in geriatric settings (six papers, 1138 patients) reduced mortality and the need for nursing home placement, but the outcome for ADL function was not significantly changed. Function and length of stay varied between the studies. The outcome of geriatric rehabilitation was even more decisive in the randomized hip-fracture studies (seven articles, 2414 patients): the readmission rate and cost were significantly better. Ten studies were found, comparing the outcome of acute admissions of frail elderly patients (4683) with either geriatric (GEMU, GRU) or general medical wards. The effect of rehabilitation regarding mortality rate at one year, placement in a nursing home, physical function, contentment with services, readmission rate and cost was significant improvement in the geriatric settings. Internal comparisons of geriatric programmes in nursing homes, day hospitals and in-home services (seven studies, 1261 patient) revealed some differences in outcomes regarding function, contentment and costs. CONCLUSION: Specialized geriatric rehabilitation is complicated but effective when properly performed. Interdisciplinary teamwork, targeting of patients, comprehensive assessment and intensive and patient-targeted rehabilitation seem to characterize the most effective programmes. Rehabilitation of frail elderly people poses a major future challenge and has to be developed further for the sake of elderly people's quality of life as well as economic reasons.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

[University education in geriatrics: medical student's opinions on gerontology and geriatric medicine].

With the aging of Japan's population, physicians need to be aware of advances in geriatric medicine. To assess the status of geriatric medicine in undergraduate education, we surveyed of medical student's opinions on gerontology and geriatric medicine. A questionnaire was sent to six-year medical students at a total of 20 schools that did not include geriatric medicine in their curriculum. Responses were obtained from 950 students (47.6%) at 16 schools (80%). Almost half of the students (42%) had experiences in health care facilities for the elderly. Ten percent were content with their education in geriatric medicine education and 59% were not. A total of 41.4% felt that geriatric medicine is difficult because it involves many different subjects. Some students had experience as volunteers working with elderly people; they were aware of the aging of Japan's population, and felt that their training in basic geriatrics and in geriatric diseases was insufficient. A total of 56% agreed that all medical schools should have classes in geriatric medicine and 14% did not. Medical students in the schools without classes in geriatric medicine identified dementia (73%), cerebral vascular accidents (51%), cancer (24%) and osteoporosis (19%) as common in elderly people, with no differences between schools. The corresponding data for medical students in schools with classes in geriatric medicine were dementia (77%), cerebral vascular accidents (44%), osteoporosis (29%), and cancer (16%). Undergraduate medical students seem to be exposed to widely differing curricula with regard to geriatric medicine. We found a lack of uniformity in the teaching of gerontology and geriatric medicine to undergraduate medical students in Japan.

Education, Medical, Undergraduate↗
PubMed1995

The importance of geriatrics to family medicine: a position paper by the Group on Geriatric Education of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine.

The role of geriatrics and geriatricians in family medicine remains unsettled. Despite a rapidly aging population, a tremendous shortage now exists of faculty with interest and expertise in geriatrics. Relatively few family practice residents choose to enter geriatric fellowship programs, and federal funding for such programs has been reduced. Despite accreditation requirements, residency programs are not always able to provide the range of geriatric experiences needed to properly prepare graduates to provide care for the broad range of older patients. Medical students' exposure to geriatrics remains limited. The Group on Geriatric Education of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine believes that family medicine faculty must recognize and be committed to the notion that geriatrics is integral to family medicine. Both undergraduate and residency training programs should emphasize experience with geriatric patients in multiple settings. In particular, the nursing home should not be the main focus of geriatric training. The small number of certified geriatric faculty will be able to provide leadership, but a broad range of faculty must become involved in teaching geriatrics. Faculty development activities and continuing education programs to foster the necessary expertise will be essential to the accomplishment of this task.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

[New structures in geriatric care: the geriatric home consultation by a nurse practitioner].

The growing number of elderly and chronically ill people causes an increasing demand for care. New patterns in care for geriatric patients are required, to guarantee geriatric care in the future. In the Transmural Model for Geriatric Care, the geriatric nurse practitioner participates in geriatric home consultation. The geriatric nurse practitioner makes the home visits of the geriatrician. First experiences with home consultation by geriatric nurse practitioner are positive. The input of the geriatric nurse practitioner in home consultation has two goals: care substitution and improvement of quality of care. Substitution of care enlarges the possibilities of the geriatrician, which are limited now, because of the enormous demand for geriatric care. The specific tasks of the geriatric nurse practitioner are functional assessment and care coordination.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

[The concept of geriatric medicine and differentiated geriatric care].

The concept of geriatric medicine as a differentiated care of geriatric patients is discussed. Essential is the conception of a geriatric patient, endangered by specific geriatric risks and profiting from the specific geriatric care and regimen. Within the institutional geriatric elements, methodological issues of the development of the geriatric care namely the acute geriatric hospital wards in and subacute hospital wards are stressed. Significance of paramedic personnel (nurses, occupational therapy) in geriatric care is given and the necessity of follow up and long-term hospital care as well as primary non-medical care and community centers is shown. The potential of the district geriatric nurses employed by community centers parallel to the home care agencies is mentioned.

Aged↗