Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Genomic medicine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2024

Evaluation of the Master's in Genomic Medicine framework: A national, multiprofessional program to educate health care professionals in NHS England.

PURPOSE: Genomic medicine is revolutionizing health care but requires health care professionals to update their understanding of genomics and its application to clinical practice for successful implementation. To meet this need, Health Education England developed the Master's in Genomic Medicine, a national multiprofessional program to increase genomic literacy in the National Health Service workforce. This study summarizes an evaluation of the program, which will inform its future development. METHODS: Underpinned by Moore's evaluation framework, a mixed methods approach was used to characterize (1) learner demographics, (2) perceptions of the program, (3) knowledge and/or qualifications achieved, and (4) the outcome(s) for practice in the workplace. RESULTS: Learners were a diverse cohort of health care professionals, including doctors, health care scientists, nurses and midwives. Participant satisfaction was high for all elements of the program, including the curriculum, learning environment(s), and multiprofessional cohort(s), despite the challenges of engaging working professionals in part-time learning. Both learners and their managers reported enhanced genomic practice after completion of their studies. CONCLUSION: The Master's in Genomic Medicine program is an effective approach to professional education in genomic medicine. This broad multiprofessional learning complements training aimed at specific groups of health care professionals.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Evaluating Patient Experience With Genomic Medicine: A Content Analysis of National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers' Websites.

BACKGROUND: National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers (NCI-CCs) throughout the United States are mandated to translate state-of-the-art cancer research to communities and enhance clinical care for patients within their catchment areas. NCI-CCs play a vital role in national cancer initiatives focused on optimizing cancer care via personalized medicine in which improved risk assessment, screening, and genetic testing are foundational. In this era of targeted personalized care, although genetics has been incorporated into cancer centers, it is unknown how these innovations are being communicated to the public and communities served on cancer center websites. There is particularly limited knowledge surrounding how NCI-CCs publicly communicate their efforts to integrate patient-reported experiences with genomics to fulfill their overall mission and reduce the cancer burden in their catchment areas. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate how NCI-CCs publicly share information on their websites related to cancer center programming and activities to measure and incorporate patients' experiences with the use of genetics to guide cancer care. METHODS: For all NCI-CCs providing clinical care (N=65), we conducted a review of publicly available and published information and assessed five domains relevant to patients' experiences with genomic medicine: whether NCI-CCs (1) provided genetic testing, (2) directly expressed a goal of delivering personalized care, (3) provided pharmacogenomic testing, (4) assessed patient-reported experience measures with genomic medicine (including patient-reported outcomes [PROs] and other patient experience measures [OPEMs]), and (5) indicated an established infrastructure or set of resources to evaluate patient experience. We conducted a content analysis of the publicly available websites of NCI-CCs using the validated directed approach to content analysis. We quantified the results of our content analysis using count measures based on a binary (yes or no) coding scheme. RESULTS: While almost all the NCI-CCs (64/65, 98%) discussed providing personalized care and performing genetic testing on their websites, we found that 58% (38/65) indicated online that they assessed PROs or other patient experience measures with genomic medicine. Fewer centers (25/65, 38%) discussed on their websites having a mechanism for evaluating patients' experiences with genomic medicine that captured broader types of information beyond PROs, such as measures of patient education or care team communication. Finally, approximately 1 in 3 NCI-CCs (23/65, 35%) indicated having an established infrastructure with departmental resources dedicated to monitoring patients' experiences. These centers reflecting a built-in infrastructure were 8% to 12% more likely to publicly communicate targeted activities to assess patients' experiences with genomic medicine. CONCLUSIONS: With the burgeoning use of genomics in research and clinical care, comprehensive evaluation and incorporation of measures of patients' experiences with genomic medicine present a key opportunity to enhance cancer care at NCI-CCs.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

A multicenter survey on BRAF screening for the implementation of perioperative cancer genomic medicine for resectable colorectal oligometastases.

BACKGROUND: Genomic screening is an essential, but potentially time-consuming procedure, especially in neoadjuvant settings. We evaluated the preoperative screening of the BRAF V600E mutation for recruitment to a clinical trial among patients with resectable colorectal oligometastases (CRM). METHODS: In April 2022, an investigator-initiated trial was launched to investigate the efficacy and safety of perioperative use of the BEACON triplet regimen for BRAF V600E mutant resectable CRM. BRAF screening was retrospectively conducted in patients with resected colorectal liver metastases in 2019 for planning the trial and prospectively conducted in preoperative patients with resectable CRM from January 2022 to June 2025 for patient recruitment to the trial. RESULTS: BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 12 (3.2%) of 379 postoperative patients retrospectively and in 36 (1.7%) of 2140 preoperative patients prospectively, with 1840 patients (86.0%) carrying the wild-type and 264 patients (12.3%) classified as untested. The detection rate of the BRAF V600E mutation was significantly lower when the screening was performed prospectively in preoperative patients (P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). The untested rates varied across metastatic organs, with 10.3% in the liver, 18.1% in the lungs, 12.0% in the lymph nodes, 16.7% in the peritoneum, and 7.8% in other organs. The untested rates decreased consistently across semiannual comparisons: 28.5% in the first evaluation, followed by 15.0%, 12.0%, 8.4%, 9.1%, 7.3%, and 7.1% (P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.01 when compared with the first period). CONCLUSION: Raising physician awareness, as reflected by the untested rate, is a crucial factor in conducting clinical trials to implement perioperative cancer genomic medicine.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Toward an integrated resource for pharmacogenomics (PGx): Survey findings from the genomic medicine communities.

PURPOSE: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is a critical component of precision health care that aims to improve drug efficacy and reduce adverse events. Terminologies and standards have not always aligned between PGx and broader genomic medicine communities, which is a barrier to PGx implementation. An updated assessment of community barriers, needs, and perspectives is critical to enable more standardized terminologies and interpretation frameworks. METHODS: The Clinical Genome Resource's PGx Interpretation Committee (PGxIC, formerly referred to as the PGx Working Group, PGxWG) conducted 2 surveys targeting the PGx and genomic medicine communities (n = 508) to evaluate perspectives on PGx clinical validity and actionability frameworks, as well as other barriers to PGx implementation. Surveys were tailored toward self-reported familiarity with PGx. Data primarily consisted of free text, which were analyzed using qualitative content analysis methods. RESULTS: Survey responses indicated conflation of terminology across disciplines, including confusion around differing definitions of terms in PGx and non-PGx contexts. Data also indicated broad support for leveraging existing PGx guidelines and framework structures alongside the standardization of approaches and centralization of resources. CONCLUSION: These novel survey results demonstrate broad consensus on the importance of integrating PGx into clinical practice, including support for development of gene-drug response clinical validity and actionability frameworks aligned with Clinical Genome Resource's frameworks for gene-disease relationships.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Genomic Medicine Sweden: Advancing precision medicine at the national level.

High-throughput sequencing has transformed clinical diagnostics of rare diseases (RD), cancer and infectious diseases by enabling the identification of disease-causing genetic alterations and facilitating individualised treatment and care. In response to these advances, Genomic Medicine Sweden (GMS) was established in 2017 as a national collaborative effort to accelerate implementation of genomics-based precision medicine within Sweden's regionally organized, publicly funded healthcare system. GMS brings together the seven university healthcare regions and their associated medical faculties, in collaboration with healthcare regions across Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, patient organizations, industry and governmental agencies. Activities are coordinated through national disease-specific expert groups, supported by cross-cutting functions in bioinformatics, health economics, ethics, education and patient engagement. At the operational level, seven Genomic Medicine Centres, embedded at university hospitals, develop and deliver harmonised genomic diagnostics nationwide. The National Genomics Platform provides secure infrastructure for large-scale data storage, analysis, and national and international data sharing. Following initial project-based funding, GMS now receives long-term governmental support. This review describes the national implementation of genomic-based precision diagnostics, discusses challenges and lessons learnt, and highlights key milestones across disease areas, including whole-genome sequencing in RD and paediatric cancer, comprehensive genomic profiling of haematological malignancies and solid tumours, pathogen genomics in microbiology, pharmacogenomic testing and emerging applications of polygenic risk scores in complex diseases. Collectively, these efforts have contributed to more than 500,000 genomic tests being performed within Swedish healthcare between 2017 and 2025. Finally, we outline future diagnostic needs and priority areas to ensure sustainable, scalable and equitable access to precision medicine.

Precision Medicine↗
PubMed2024

Towards genomic medicine: a tailored next-generation sequencing panel for hydroxyurea pharmacogenomics in Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacogenomics of hydroxyurea is an important aspect in the management of sickle cell disease (SCD), especially in the era of genomic medicine. Genetic variations in loci associated with HbF induction and drug metabolism are prime targets for hydroxyurea (HU) pharmacogenomics,&#xa0;as these can significantly impact the therapeutic efficacy and safety of HU in SCD patients. METHODS: This study involved designing of a custom panel targeting BCL11A, ARG2, HBB, HBG1, WAC, HBG2, HAO2, MYB, SAR1A, KLF10, CYP2C9, CYP2E1 and NOS1 as potential HU pharmacogenomics targets.&#xa0;These genes were selected based on their known roles in HbF induction and HU metabolism. The panel was designed using the Illumina Design Studio (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and achieved a total coverage of 96% of all genomic targets over a span of 51.6 kilobases (kb). This custom panel was then sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform to ensure high coverage and accuracy. RESULTS: We are reporting a successfully designed Illumina (MiSeq) HU pharmacogenomics custom panel encompassing 51.6 kilobases. The designed panel achieved greater than 1000x amplicon coverage which is sufficient for genomic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a valuable tool for research in HU pharmacogenomics, especially in Africa where SCD is highly prevalent, and personalized medicine approaches are crucial for improving patient outcomes.&#xa0;The custom-designed Illumina (MiSeq) panel, with its extensive coverage and high sequencing depth, provides a robust platform for studying genetic variations associated with HU response. This panel can contribute to the development of tailored therapeutic strategies, ultimately enhancing the management of SCD through more effective and safer use of hydroxyurea.

Hydroxyurea↗
PubMed2026

Advances in CRISPR Base Editing: From Molecular Evolution to Therapeutic Applications in Genomic Medicine.

CRISPR-Cas9 systems revolutionized gene editing, but inherent drawbacks, namely DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and the difficulty of achieving precise repairs (due to low HDR efficiency), led researchers to invent new, more accurate gene editing tools. Base editing represents a significant leap forward, enabling targeted single-nucleotide conversions directly on the DNA without DSBs or donor templates. The core technology involves fusing catalytically dead or nickase Cas proteins to DNA deaminase enzymes. Cytosine base editors (CBEs) convert C&#x2022;G to T&#x2022;A pairs, while adenine base editors (ABEs) change A&#x2022;T to G&#x2022;C. These editors exploit the deaminase function within the R-loop structure formed by Cas binding and co-opt endogenous DNA repair mechanisms for precision. While offering improved efficiency and editing precision, base editing faces persistent challenges, such as off-target effects, bystander edits, delivery and ethical concerns. Continuous engineering efforts have refined these tools, enhancing accuracy, expanding targetability and reducing unwanted edits. The base editing arsenal has also broadened to include C-to-G base editors (CGBEs), dual A&C editors and versions targeting organelles. Successful preclinical studies demonstrating the correction of mutations responsible for the disease have paved the way for clinical trials, which are now testing therapies for conditions like sickle cell disease, &#x3b2;-thalassaemia and hypercholesterolemia using various delivery systems. This review explores CRISPR base editing's origins, mechanisms of action, potential therapies and current restrictions, pointing to its broadening impact on medical genetics.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Beyond Earth: Recent Advancements in Microgravity Biomedical and Genetic Research in Saudi Arabia.

Microgravity research has emerged as a rapidly evolving field at the intersection of space medicine, genomics, biotechnology, and precision medicine. Exposure to the space environment induces complex physiological and molecular adaptations that affect multiple biological systems, including immune regulation, metabolism, musculoskeletal function, and gene expression. Recent advances in genomics, multi-omics technologies, artificial intelligence, and bioengineering have substantially improved our understanding of biological adaptation to spaceflight and expanded opportunities for translational biomedical research. This review summarizes recent advances in genetic and biomedical research under microgravity conditions, with particular emphasis on molecular mechanisms, omics technologies, genome editing, microbiome research, regenerative medicine, and personalized healthcare approaches. Major experimental platforms, landmark spaceflight studies, and translational applications in infectious diseases, cancer biology, aging, tissue engineering, and pharmaceutical development are discussed. The review also highlights Saudi Arabia's emerging contributions to genomic medicine and space biosciences through initiatives such as the Saudi Human Genome Program, the Saudi Pangenome Project, the Saudi Space Agency, and the BioGravity Initiative. Recent Saudi participation in human spaceflight and microgravity-associated biomedical research is discussed within the context of Vision 2030 and national investments in biotechnology and precision medicine. Collectively, advances in microgravity research are expected to contribute to the advancement of precision medicine and facilitate the development of innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies with significant implications for both human space exploration and terrestrial healthcare.

Humans↗
PubMed2024

Genomics-informed neuropsychiatric care for neurodevelopmental disorders: Results from a multidisciplinary clinic.

PURPOSE: Patients with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) have high rates of neuropsychiatric comorbidities. Genomic medicine may help guide care because pathogenic variants are identified in up to 50% of patients with NDDs. We evaluate the impact of a genomics-informed, multidisciplinary, neuropsychiatric specialty clinic on the diagnosis and management of patients with NDDs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 316 patients from the University of California, Los Angeles Care and Research in Neurogenetics Clinic, a genomics-informed multidisciplinary clinic. RESULTS: Among the 246 patients who underwent genetic testing, 41.8% had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. Patients had 62 different genetic diagnoses, with 12 diagnoses shared by 2 or more patients, whereas 50 diagnoses were found in only single patients. Genetic diagnosis resulted in direct changes to clinical management in all patients with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant, including cascade testing (30.6%), family counseling (22.2%), medication changes (13.9%), clinical trial referral (2.8%), medical surveillance (30.6%), and specialty referrals (69.4%). CONCLUSIONS: A genomics-informed model can provide significant clinical benefits to patients with NDDs, directly affecting management across multiple domains for most diagnosed patients. As precision treatments advance, establishing a genetic diagnosis will be critical for proper management. With the growing number of rare neurogenetic disorders, clinician training should emphasize core principles of genomic medicine over individual syndromes.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Challenges of genomic testing for patients and clinicians in Latin America: Foundations of a qualitative multi-country study.

Genomic medicine is expanding across Latin America (LATAM), yet access to essential ancillary services such as genetic counselling remains limited. 'Latin-SEQ' is a study that provides whole exome sequencing (WES) for neuromuscular diseases across 18 countries, aiming to improve diagnostic rates and generate region-specific genetic insights. However, funding constraints exclude genetic counselling and cascade testing, raising concerns about equitable and harm-free care. This paper reports early findings from 'Latin-SEQ Plus,' a mixed-methods study exploring patient and healthcare practitioner (HCP) perspectives on WES and genetic counselling. Data were generated via surveys with patients and HCPs, and participatory workshops with HCPs across six countries. We found that patients strongly valued genetic testing for diagnostic clarity, improved care, and family planning. HCPs acknowledged the diagnostic benefits of WES but highlighted absence of local genetic counselling services, inconsistent pre and post-test practices, and uncertainty in managing incidental findings and variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Psychological impacts related to WES results are not always addressed, underscoring risks of psychological and emotional harm for patients. Access to WES and genetic counselling is limited in LATAM due to financial hardship and the absence of a clear genetic counselling infrastructure. Our findings also reveal a mismatch between patient expectations and HCPs' capacity to deliver comprehensive genomic care. We argue for urgent investment in genetic counselling infrastructure, HCP training, culturally tailored resources, and policy frameworks to support equitable implementation of genomic medicine in LATAM.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

A complete diploid human genome benchmark for personalized genomics.

Human genome resequencing typically involves mapping reads to a reference genome to call variants; however, this approach suffers from both technical and reference biases, leaving many duplicated and structurally polymorphic regions of the genome unmapped. Consequently, existing variant benchmarks, generated by the same methods, fail to assess these complex regions. To address this limitation, we present a telomere-to-telomere genome benchmark that achieves near-perfect accuracy (i.e. no detectable errors) across 99.4% of the complete, diploid HG002 genome. This benchmark adds 701.4 Mb of autosomal sequence and both sex chromosomes (216.8 Mb), totaling 15.3% of the genome that was absent from prior benchmarks. We also provide a diploid annotation of genes, transposable elements, segmental duplications, and satellite repeats, including 39,144 protein-coding genes across both haplotypes. To facilitate application of the benchmark, we developed tools for measuring the accuracy of sequencing reads, phased variant call sets, and genome assemblies against a diploid reference. Genome-wide analyses show that state-of-the-art de novo assembly methods resolve 2-7% more sequence and outperform variant calling accuracy by an order of magnitude, yielding just one error per 100 kb across 99.9% of the benchmark regions. Adoption of genome-based benchmarking is expected to accelerate the development of cost-effective methods for complete genome sequencing, expanding the reach of genomic medicine to the entire genome and enabling a new era of personalized genomics.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2024

Payer perspectives on genomic testing in the United States: A systematic literature review.

PURPOSE: Health care stakeholders' perspectives on the value of genomic testing vary widely and directly affect the access and practice of genomic medicine. To our knowledge, a review of US health care payers' perspectives on genomic testing has not been performed. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review of US payers' perspectives on genomic testing in the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases. Of the 161 nonduplicate records screened, we summarized findings from 20 included records, and using the framework method, common domains were recorded. RESULTS: Domains included clinical utility, coverage decision frameworks, potential harms, costs, paying for research, demand/pressure, the flexibility of outcomes considered, and personal utility. There was consensus on the definition of clinical utility as improved health outcomes, and the nuances of genomic testing were reported as challenging to fit within existing coverage decision frameworks. Perspectives varied on accepting broader outcomes or uses of genomic testing and whether costs influence coverage decisions. Study methodologies were heterogeneous. CONCLUSION: A deeper understanding of how payers approach genomic testing may allow comparison with other stakeholders' perspectives and may identify challenges, opportunities, and solutions to align a conceptual and evidentiary framework better to demonstrate the value of genomic testing.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Mechanistic Perspectives From Genomics and Pangenomics of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants: Linking Genome Architecture to Phytochemical Diversity.

Medicinal and aromatic plants (MAPs) produce a remarkable diversity of specialized metabolites with significant pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and industrial value. Although advances in long-read sequencing, chromosome-scale genome assembly, and pangenomics have greatly expanded genomic resources, the mechanistic links between genome architecture and phytochemical diversity remain incompletely understood. The present review synthesizes current evidence describing how structural genomic variation may contribute to phytochemical diversity, while acknowledging that many proposed genome-to-metabolite relationships require further experimental validation. Examples illustrate how genome architecture is associated with specialized-metabolite biosynthesis through multiple regulatory processes. However, the strength of supporting evidence varies considerably among MAP species. Moreover, relatively few genome-to-metabolite relationships have been confirmed through direct functional validation. We further discuss how pangenomics, multiomics integration, genome editing, synthetic biology, and artificial intelligence support the discovery, validation, and engineering of specialized metabolic pathways. Casual conclusions are evaluated according to the strength of available evidence, highlighting where causal relationships have been experimentally established and where conclusions remain primarily association-based. Overall, this review provides an integrated conceptual and evidence-based perspective summarizing proposed relationships between genome architecture and phytochemical diversity and outlines future priorities for functional genomics, precision breeding, metabolic engineering, and sustainable utilization of MAPs.

artificial intelligence↗
PubMed2025

Worldwide Innovative Network (WIN) Consortium in Personalized Cancer Medicine: Bringing next-generation precision oncology to patients.

The human genome project ushered in a genomic medicine era that was largely unimaginable three decades ago. Discoveries of druggable cancer drivers enabled biomarker-driven gene- and immune-targeted therapy and transformed cancer treatment. Minimizing treatment not expected to benefit, and toxicity-including financial and time-are important goals of modern oncology. The Worldwide Innovative Network (WIN) Consortium in Personalized Cancer Medicine founded by Drs. John Mendelsohn and Thomas Tursz provided a vision for innovation, collaboration and global impact in precision oncology. Through pursuit of transcriptomic signatures, artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, global precision cancer medicine clinical trials and input from an international Molecular Tumor Board (MTB), WIN has led the way in demonstrating patient benefit from precision-therapeutics through N-of-1 molecularly-driven studies. WIN Next-Generation Precision Oncology (WINGPO) trials are being developed in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic settings, incorporate real-world data, digital pathology, and advanced algorithms to guide MTB prioritization of therapy combinations for a diverse global population. WIN has pursued combinations that target multiple drivers/hallmarks of cancer in individual patients. WIN continues to be impactful through collaboration with industry, government, sponsors, funders, academic and community centers, patient advocates, and other stakeholders to tackle challenges including drug access, costs, regulatory barriers, and patient support. WIN's collaborative next generation of precision oncology trials will guide treatment selection for patients with advanced cancers through MTB and AI algorithms based on serial liquid and tissue biopsies and exploratory omics including transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and functional precision medicine. Our vision is to accelerate the future of precision oncology care.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Aligning awareness, systems and policy to increase equitable access to genomically driven cancer care.

Genomic testing has the potential to transform cancer care across the patient pathway. However, its benefits remain unevenly realised across populations and health systems. Precision oncology is characterised by a strong promissory discourse, with expectations of improved outcomes and cost-effectiveness, yet real-world implementation remains variable and context dependent. This review examines how patient and public awareness interacts with, and is constrained by, structural, organisational and political-economic factors that shape equitable access to genomically driven cancer care across five themes: (1) the power of patient and public advocacy; (2) learning from the patient perspective; (3) culturally responsive communication; (4) structural and personal barriers and facilitators and (5) political economy of health. Examples are mapped across global regions to highlight how health system, structural and societal factors continue to limit the universal realisation of genomic medicine's benefits. We present four recommendations to strengthen the translation of awareness into equitable access and clinical impact: (1) expand and adequately power genomic studies in underserved populations; (2) improve risk communication and decision-making across the cancer pathway; (3) equitable validation and interpretation of emerging genomic technologies and (4) generate real-world evidence on access, uptake and outcomes of genome-matched therapies. Embedding awareness, trust, access and equity in future initiatives is imperative to realise the promise of precision medicine for all patients.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed2024

Genetics of Latin American Diversity Project: Insights into population genetics and association studies in admixed groups in the Americas.

Latin Americans are underrepresented in genetic studies, increasing disparities in personalized genomic medicine. Despite available genetic data from thousands of Latin Americans, accessing and navigating the bureaucratic hurdles for consent or access remains challenging. To address this, we introduce the Genetics of Latin American Diversity (GLAD) Project, compiling genome-wide information from 53,738 Latin Americans across 39 studies representing 46 geographical regions. Through GLAD, we identified heterogeneous ancestry composition and recent gene flow across the Americas. Additionally, we developed GLAD-match, a simulated annealing-based algorithm, to match the genetic background of external samples to our database, sharing summary statistics (i.e., allele and haplotype frequencies) without transferring individual-level genotypes. Finally, we demonstrate the potential of GLAD as a critical resource for evaluating statistical genetic software in the presence of admixture. By providing this resource, we promote genomic research in Latin Americans and contribute to the promises of personalized medicine to more people.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

The dark genome in cardiovascular medicine.

Only &#x223c;1%-2% of the human genome directly codes for proteins. The remainder consists of non-coding DNA, often referred to as the 'dark genome'. This includes regulatory elements, transposable and repetitive sequences, structural genomic features, pseudogenes, intronic and intergenic regions, and non-coding RNA (ncRNA) genes. These components are increasingly recognized as major regulators of gene expression, cell identity, and disease susceptibility. Currently, dark genome elements, particularly ncRNAs are increasingly recognized as important regulators of cardiovascular health and disease. Advances in genome analysis technologies have greatly improved our understanding of these non-coding regions and revealed clearer connections between the dark genome and cardiovascular traits. This review highlights major parts of the dark genome involved in cardiovascular disease, with emphasis on those for which mechanistic understanding and translational relevance are beginning to emerge. As mechanistic insight into individual and collective components of the dark genome advances, it increasingly enables the development of new opportunities for targeted therapeutics for cardiovascular prevention and disease management.

Humans↗