Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Genetic counseling”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1978

Genetic counselling and genetics of cleft lip and cleft palate.

Modern neonatal care and advanced plastic surgical correction have led to the survival of most newborns with oral clefts. These children are likely to reproduce. A slight increase in the incidence of oral clefts may be expected in the future. The genetics of cleft lip and cleft palate is reviewed. The inheritance is usually multifactorial. With normal parents the risk of having a first affected child with cleft lip is about one per thousand, the risk of having a second affected child 4 per cent and the risk of having a third affected child 10 per cent. If a parent has already a cleft lip, the risk of having a first affected child now is 4 per cent, while the risk of having a second affected child is 10 per cent. The methodology of genetic counseling is given.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗
PubMed1979

Genetic counseling.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Genetic Counseling↗
PubMed1979

Hereditary polyposis coli. II. Genetic counseling.

The problems of genetic counseling in hereditary polyposis coli (HPC)(taken as the type of the age-dependent dominant mendelian trait) are discussed in some detail. They are threefold: first to formalize, for purposes of decision, the total penalty (the "fardel") typically imposed by the disorder for each case, and how it may be modified by treatment; second, to determine the logical issues involved in making probability statements in the face of the uniqueness of each case; third, to use to best advantage the information on the pattern of onset to assess the probability that a person, at risk but not so far affected, does in fact harbor the gene. The third problem points up the need for a formal model of the pathogenesis and its implications for the pattern of onset and the sensitivity of the assessment to the assumptions of the model, especially where one has to rely on cross-sectional, as distinct from longitudinal, data.

Colonic Neoplasms↗
PubMed2026

Unacknowledged Burdens and Clinical Assets of BIPOC Genetic Counseling Students: Qualitative Evidence to Inform Supervision.

As the genetic counseling profession works to diversify its predominantly white workforce, understanding the experiences of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) students is central to equity efforts. While BIPOC students bring invaluable cultural and linguistic diversity that improves patient care, they often navigate clinical training environments that lack diversity and psychological safety. This article draws on data from a longitudinal constructivist qualitative study to examine how racial and ethnic concordance (or lack thereof) with patients and clinical supervisors influenced the clinical training, professional development, and well-being of BIPOC genetic counseling students. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 BIPOC genetic counseling students in the United States and Canada. Interviews were recorded using Zoom.us, transcribed using Rev.com, and analyzed in NVivo using reflexive thematic analysis. The analysis led to the construction of three themes: (1)Shared identity with patients is a clinical advantage: Participants leveraged their cultural and linguistic intuition to establish trust and rapport with patients; (2) Identity navigation involves cognitive and emotional labor: Participants shouldered an unacknowledged burden in managing stereotype threat, overcoming feelings of exclusion, and educating supervisors; and (3) Racial/ethnic identity shapes supervisory dynamics: Participants described BIPOC supervisors as providing identity-affirming support, while some white supervisors avoided discussions about identity or committed microaggressions. These results suggest that BIPOC genetic counseling students have clinical assets rooted in biculturalism, yet carry a burden that often goes unacknowledged of managing power imbalances and pressure to assimilate in predominantly white clinical supervision spaces. To promote equitable training, programs should implement supervisor training on culturally responsive identity broaching, establish independent, transparent mechanisms for students to report biases they encounter in clinic, and expand mentorship networks to provide additional support.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Are we Prepared? Genetic Counseling for Stillbirth in the Sequencing Era.

Stillbirth affects approximately 1 in 175 pregnancies annually in the United States. Although the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends genetic testing as part of the stillbirth evaluation, families often face barriers to obtaining a complete evaluation. Expansion of the diagnostic evaluation of stillbirth is expected to include exome/genome sequencing, with preliminary studies demonstrating its diagnostic utility. Consequently, genetic counselors (GCs) are expected to play an expanding role in post-stillbirth care. This study explored current genetic counseling practices for stillbirth and GCs' preparedness to support patients in this setting. A cross-sectional survey was distributed across four channels. Eligible participants included GCs in the United States and Canada with at least 1 year of prenatal experience. The survey assessed GC frequency and timing in stillbirth counseling, genetic testing practices, comfort addressing psychosocial needs, and perceived barriers to care. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Group comparisons were performed using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Open-ended responses were coded for themes. Seventy-one responses were analyzed. Approximately half of respondents (49.3%, n = 36) reported "never/very rarely/rarely" counseling patients postpartum, despite this being the optimal time to offer genetic testing. Delivering providers (46.5%, n = 33) were often responsible for informing patients about testing and obtaining consent, compared to GCs (11.3%, n = 8). Although chromosomal microarray (CMA) is recommended as the standard of care (SOC), 12.7% (n = 9) of GCs reported not offering CMA for anomalous and non-anomalous stillbirths. Perceived barriers to SOC testing included reported lack of obstetrician awareness (91.5%, n = 65) and challenges coordinating specimen collection (90.1%, n = 64). These findings highlight barriers to SOC genetic evaluation and underscore the need to strengthen institutional protocols, enhance provider education, and develop stillbirth-specific genetic counseling guidelines. GC involvement in these efforts will be essential to promoting equitable access to comprehensive post-stillbirth care as sequencing becomes integrated into practice.

Humans↗
PubMed1975

Genetics of acheiropodia (the handless and footless families of Brazil). IX. Genetic counseling.

Acheiropodia offers no special problem of a counseling nature. The genetic risk can be easily estimated since the anomaly is due to a rare autosomal recessive gene with complete penetrance and little variation in expression. However, considering that acheiropod individuals have a tremendous handicap (they are born without both hands and feet), it is remarkable how they overcome this difficulty and lead an almost 'normal' life. Several examples are given in this paper. The 'philosophy' of genetic counseling is briefly discussed; emphasis is placed upon the necessity for the geneticist to present the good perspectives, while preparing the consultand for the worst. Even in this last possibility, however, not everything is necessarily lost as the example of the acheiropods attests.

Abnormalities, Multiple↗
PubMed2026

AI'm Here to Help: Enhancing Laboratory Genetic Counseling with Artificial Intelligence.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the fields of genetics and genetic counseling, enhancing both clinical and laboratory practices. The rise of AI technologies has drawn attention to their potential impact on genetic counseling, particularly in patient diagnosis and the counseling processes. CONTENT: In the laboratory, AI plays a critical role in improving communication between laboratory genetic counselors and healthcare providers by automating routine tasks and optimizing workflows. These advancements allow genetic counselors to dedicate more time to addressing complex inquiries, improving genetic test selection, and helping providers interpret genetic test results. As AI continues to integrate into laboratory genetic counseling practice, it presents both opportunities and challenges. At the time of submission, there is a large knowledge gap regarding AI and its application to laboratory genetic counseling, given the lack of published information on this topic. SUMMARY: This article summarizes existing literature, the history and current applications of AI in laboratory genetic counseling, examines its benefits and limitations, and explores future directions for its implementation in the field.

Humans↗
PubMed1976

Psychological responses to genetic counseling for Down's syndrome.

To assess some of the emotional aspects of why parents seek genetic counseling and to measure the effect of genetic counseling in parents of children with Down's syndrome, pre- and post-counseling measures of anxiety, hostility, depression, and self-concept were obtained from 43 parents. Pre-counseling responses were compared with those of normative controls, and pre- and post-counseling scores were compared for areas of significant change. Anxiety, hostility and depression levels were significantly higher in parents seeking counseling than in normative controls (both P less than 0.002). Following genetic counseling, there was a significant lowering of anxiety (P less than 0.0005) and depression (P less than 0.05) along with a significant increase in overall self-concept (P less than 0.01). The study documents the importance of looking at factors related to emotional needs and self-image of parents in genetic counseling.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2026

(Re)imagining the Future of Genetic Counseling: A Reflexive Qualitative Analysis of Sociopolitical Power, Cultural Safety, Systemic Racism, and Comparative Practice in the United Kingdom, Aotearoa New Zealand and, Australia.

Genetic counseling is undergoing a rapid transformation as genomic medicine becomes embedded within mainstream healthcare systems. At the same time, the profession is being challenged to respond to systemic racism, colonial legacies, technological change, and evolving expectations regarding equity and justice. Historically, genetic counseling emerged within twentieth-century medical genetics and was influenced by political, social, scientific, and medical forces that included eugenic ideology, values, and practices. The profession has since evolved substantially toward psychosocial, patient-centered, and non-directive models of care. Contemporary debates regarding "newgenics" or "neugenics" further demonstrate how concerns regarding equity, reproductive ethics, disability, and genomic stratification continue to shape genomic healthcare discourse. This qualitative reflexive practice paper explores how systemic racism, colonial legacy, cultural safety and structural power shape genetic counseling practice in the United Kingdom (UK), Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia, and how these forces continue to reshape the profession's future identity. A reflexive, narrative, and comparative qualitative approach was employed, grounded in the authors' lived professional experiences across UK and Australasian contexts and informed by purposively selected policy, professional and scholarly literature relating to cultural safety, dignity, anti-racism, and Human Rights-Based Decision-Making. Through iterative reflexive dialogue, comparative analysis, and thematic synthesis, four interrelated themes were developed examining sociopolitical context, systemic racism, cultural safety and technologization within contemporary genetic counseling practice. Comparative analysis identified substantial differences in how culturally responsive practice is conceptualized and operationalized across settings. In Aotearoa, cultural safety is strongly shaped by Te Tiriti o Waitangi, bicultural accountability, and Māori sovereignty frameworks. In Australia, culturally safer genomic care has increasingly developed through Indigenous-led initiatives and workforce reform, including the Australian Alliance for Indigenous Genomics (ALIGN). In contrast, UK practice remains largely situated within equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) frameworks that may insufficiently address systemic racism and structural power within increasingly diverse populations. Reflexive clinical examples demonstrated how inequities may emerge through undocumented patient values, standardized pathways, assumptions regarding autonomy, and misinterpretation of culturally specific communication styles. Re-imagining the future of genetic counseling requires more than just technological advancement. It requires reflexive engagement with dignity, inequity, and the sociopolitical realities of the populations served. These insights re-imagine a culturally grounded, socially responsive future for genetic counseling in an era shaped by genomic mainstreaming, digital transformation, artificial intelligence and workforce reform and one in which the profession remains ethically anchored, relationally attuned, and committed to justice-oriented practice.

Humans↗
PubMed1978

Genetic counseling as part of hospital care.

In order to determine whether genetic counseling was part of routine inpatient care in a medical school affiliated children's hospital, a retrospective review of selected patient charts was performed. The charts of a sample of 478 patients with any of ten specified types of genetic or congenital disorders were carefully studied to document whether the recording of genetic counseling had been given, "offered only," or "considered only." The disorders included were of four types: chromosomal, single gene, polygenic, and those characterized by multiple congenital anomalies, with or without a syndrome designation. One thousand six hundred and thirty-three (4.2 percent) of the hospital's patients had one of the ten disorders, but in the sample of charts studied genetic counseling was given five times and "offered only" twice; in no case was it "considered only." [The authors suggest that under-utilization of genetic knowledge and resources may be remedied in part by incorporation of a formal genetic disposition into hospital discharge protocols.]

Child↗
PubMed1978

Genetic counseling and the pediatrician.

The assistance of the pediatrician, following diagnosis of a child with a genetic disorder, towards his family consists today in giving genetic counseling for prevention of recurrence in future pregnancies. The process of genetic counseling, once the right diagnosis is made, should not be difficult as concerns Mendelian inheritance. It is well known that several chromosomal disorders follow the rules of Mendelian inheritance. The theory of polygenic or multifactorial inheritance may create problems in the accurate estimation of risks. An effort is made to discover the mechanisms of genetic "predisposition" or the adverse environmental factors, in order to minimize the occurrence of such disorders. An important tool in prevention of several genetic disorders, which should be mentioned in genetic counseling, is prenatal diagnosis.

Chromosome Aberrations↗
PubMed1978

A detailed description of mothers' knowledge before genetic counseling for Down syndrome: Part I.

This study focuses on counselees' knowledge of the Down syndrome before receiving genetic counseling. Data were collected from 47 mothers of children with the Down syndrome using a structured interview of 13 open-ended questions. This instrument was found to be both internally reliable and consistent. Results of this study document the enormous variation of counselees' knowledge of the Down syndrome before genetic counseling and show that this is positively associated with their educational background. Counselees with more than a high school education knew about 60% of the genetic information pertaining to the diagnosis before genetic counseling, while those with less than a high school education knew only 23% of this information before counseling. These results indicate that the better educated counselees are less apt to need to learn basic genetic information and may seek out genetic counseling services for other reasons. Possible motives are seeking knowledge confirmation, emotional support, and personalization of the information.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1979

Genetic counseling and parental self-concept change.

Twelve parents of children with genetic diseases (Klinefelter syndrome, trisomy 21, lactase deficiency, phenylketonemia, Noonan syndrome, ichthyosis, Prader-Willi syndrome, and trisomy 13) were tested with the Tennessee Self-Concept Scale prior to and immediately after genetic counseling. Total Positive Score, indicative of self-esteem level, changed significantly. The score increased due to positive changes in the subjects' family, social, moral, physical and psychologic identity, and affect and behavior. This change is interpreted as an improvement in self-concept. Two other changes were only marginally insignificant, however. The Total Conflict decreased and that is a sign of improvement; but the NDS increased. Of the two scores, the NDS is the more powerful indicator and an increase in it is a signal for caution. Self-concept improvement with genetic counseling of parents whose progeny had one of the described diseases has, therefore, been documented. Carefully designed investigations of the future will verify factors which induce psychologic change and effect the management of disease.

Female↗
PubMed1978

Genetic counseling for psychiatric patients and their families.

The author presents an overview of genetic counseling for psychiatric patients and their families, including a brief summary of contemporary research into the evidence of genetic factors, the familial risks, and the possible modes of inheritance for major psychiatric disorders. The purpose is to review and condense the available literature pertaining to psychiatric genetic counseling for the benefit or psychiatrists and counselors in their day-to-day practice and for the general "consumer." It is hoped that giving the general public access to such information will help to reduce the suffering commonly brought about by the stigmatization of mental disorders.

Adoption↗
PubMed1979

Genetic counseling in primary obstetric care.

Of all health professionals the obstetrician is by far the best-equipped to integrate genetic counseling into health care delivery. As with most aspects of the practice of medicine, genetic information increases daily. The practicing obstetrician, by learning the fundamentals of genetics, can at least delineate at-risk situations. When a new situation arises he can either consult an up-to-date article or book 185--190 or refer the patient to the local genetic counseling clinic for further appraisal. By incorporating prospective counseling and in some cases retrospective counseling into his daily practice, the obstetrician can contribute greatly to the ideals of obstetrics, namely producing healthy children for his patients.

Age Factors↗