Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Ganciclovir”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Oral ganciclovir for patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis treated with a ganciclovir implant. Roche Ganciclovir Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The intraocular ganciclovir implant is effective for local treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), but it does not treat or prevent other systemic manifestations of cytomegalovirus infection. METHODS: Three hundred seventy-seven patients with AIDS and unilateral cytomegalovirus retinitis were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: a ganciclovir implant plus oral ganciclovir (4.5 g daily), a ganciclovir implant plus oral placebo, or intravenous ganciclovir alone. The primary outcome measure was the development of new cytomegalovirus disease, either contralateral retinitis or biopsy-proved extraocular disease. RESULTS: The incidence of new cytomegalovirus disease at six months was 44.3 percent in the group assigned to the ganciclovir implant plus placebo, as compared with 24.3 percent in the group assigned to the ganciclovir implant plus oral ganciclovir (P=0.002) and 19.6 percent in the group assigned to intravenous ganciclovir alone (P<0.001). As compared with placebo, oral ganciclovir reduced the overall risk of new cytomegalovirus disease by 37.6 percent over the one-year period of the study (P=0.02). However, in the subgroup of 103 patients who took protease inhibitors, the rates of new cytomegalovirus disease were low and of similar magnitude, regardless of treatment assignment. Progression of retinitis in the eye that initially received an implant was delayed by the addition of oral ganciclovir, as compared with placebo (P=0.03). Treatment with oral or intravenous ganciclovir reduced the risk of Kaposi's sarcoma by 75 percent (P=0.008) and 93 percent (P<0.001), respectively, as compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AIDS and cytomegalovirus retinitis, oral ganciclovir in conjunction with a ganciclovir implant reduces the incidence of new cytomegalovirus disease and delays progression of the retinitis. Treatment with oral or intravenous ganciclovir also reduces the risk of Kaposi's sarcoma.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

The ganciclovir implant plus oral ganciclovir versus parenteral cidofovir for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: The Ganciclovir Cidofovir Cytomegalovirus Retinitis Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the regimen of the ganciclovir implant plus oral ganciclovir to one of intravenous cidofovir for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and cytomegalovirus retinitis were randomized either to the regimen of the ganciclovir implant plus oral ganciclovir, 1 gm three times daily, or intravenous cidofovir, 5 mg/kg once weekly for two doses, followed by 5 mg/kg every other week. RESULTS: Mortality was similar between the two treatment groups. Mortality rates were 0.41 per person-year in patients assigned to the ganciclovir regimen and 0.49 per person-year in patients assigned to cidofovir (P =.59). Ocular outcomes were similar between the two groups. Retinitis progression occurred at a rate of 0.67 per person-year in the ganciclovir group and 0.71 per person-year in the cidofovir group (P =.72). A loss of visual acuity of 15 letters or more occurred at a rate of 0.78 per person-year in the ganciclovir group and 0.47 per person-year in the cidofovir group (P =.28). The rate of loss of visual field was 7 degrees per month in the ganciclovir group and 2 degrees per month in the cidofovir group (P =.048). Vitreous hemorrhage was more common in the ganciclovir implant group (0.13 per person-year) than in the cidofovir group (no cases, P =.014), whereas uveitis appeared to be more common in the cidofovir group (0.35 per person-year) than in the ganciclovir group (0.09 per person-year, P =.066). Nephrotoxicity (serum creatinine 1.6 mg/dL or greater) occurred at a rate of 0.18 per person-year in the ganciclovir group and 0.48 per person-year in the cidofovir group (P =.10). CONCLUSIONS: Although the small number of patients in this study limits definitive interpretation, these data suggest that in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy, the regimens of the ganciclovir implant plus oral ganciclovir and of intravenous cidofovir are similar for controlling cytomegalovirus retinitis and preventing visual loss but have different side effects.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of intravenous ganciclovir versus oral ganciclovir in the maintenance treatment of newly diagnosed cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of a new product, oral ganciclovir, in comparison to a current therapy, intravenous (i.v.) ganciclovir, in the maintenance treatment of newly diagnosed cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in patients with AIDS. DESIGN: This was a retrospective economic study of a prospective non-blinded randomised clinical trial. The model included i.v. ganciclovir induction, i.v. or oral ganciclovir maintenance and i.v. ganciclovir reinduction for patients whose CMV retinitis progressed. Safety and efficacy data were derived from the trial. A panel of Canadian infectious disease physicians and family physicians estimated the following in relation to i.v. ganciclovir treatment for CMV retinitis and related adverse events: healthcare resource utilisation, clinical practice patterns, patient out-of-pocket expenses and time loss from work. The incremental cost-effectiveness analysis is reported from a societal and a Ministry of Health perspective. SETTING: The trial was conducted in Canada (2 centres) and the US (13 centres) between March 1991 and November 1992. The model assumed that patients received either inpatient or outpatient care, or both. The model provided an analysis in a Canadian setting. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were patients with AIDS and newly diagnosed CMV retinitis. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received induction therapy with i.v. ganciclovir 5 mg/kg, twice daily for 14 days then once daily for 7 days. Patients whose CMV retinitis stabilised were randomised to maintenance therapy with either i.v. ganciclovir (5 mg/kg/day; n = 57) or oral ganciclovir (3000 mg/day; n = 60) and were followed for up to 140 days after the start of maintenance therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: The trial demonstrated that the mean time to progression of CMV retinitis was 57 days for oral ganciclovir compared with 62 days for i.v. ganciclovir maintenance therapy, as measured by masked fundus photography, and 96 days with i.v. ganciclovir compared with 68 days with oral ganciclovir according to the funduscopy results. There were more adverse events in the i.v. ganciclovir group compared with the oral ganciclovir group. The cost-effectiveness results provide the dollar amount expended in order to continue to provide additional benefit using i.v. ganciclovir compared with oral ganciclovir. The incremental cost-effectiveness (C/E) ratio was 482 Canadian dollars ($Can: 1993 to 1995 values) per progression-free day gained with i.v. ganciclovir. Sensitivity analysis using funduscopy, rather than fundus photography, to document progression of CMV retinitis resulted in a C/E ratio of $Can42. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis found that i.v. ganciclovir provided additional days free of progression of CMV retinitis when compared with oral ganciclovir, but the costs were higher.

Administration, Oral↗

Ganciclovir resistance and UL97 gene mutations in cytomegalovirus blood isolates from patients with AIDS treated with ganciclovir.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) diseases with protracted administration of ganciclovir can promote the development of resistant CMV that is associated with a poor response to therapy. It has been shown that the majority of ganciclovir-resistant CMV isolates carry mutations in the UL97 phosphotransferase gene. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the frequency of CMV resistance to ganciclovir in patients with AIDS treated with ganciclovir and to identify the UL97 gene mutations associated with ganciclovir resistance. STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of CMV blood isolates obtained over 1 year from patients treated with ganciclovir. CMV susceptibility to ganciclovir was determined by an immediate early antigen plaque reduction assay; UL97 gene mutations were identified by restriction enzyme digest analysis and sequencing. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were followed-up; 17 CMV blood isolates were obtained from 10 ganciclovir-experienced patients. Thirteen (76%) of these isolates, obtained from seven (24%) patients after a median treatment duration of 5.5 months, were resistant to ganciclovir. Five of the seven patients who had a ganciclovir-resistant CMV in blood showed retinitis progression. UL97 gene mutations were identified in nine CMV isolates at codons 460 (M --> V), 594 (A --> V and A --> T), and 595(L --> S). Three patients developed a ganciclovir-resistant virus after a ganciclovir treatment shorter than 60 days (28-58 days). In another patient, we observed that ganciclovir resistance persisted 4 months after discontinuation of ganciclovir therapy. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that ganciclovir resistance due to UL97 gene mutations is common in subjects with AIDS-related CMV diseases treated with ganciclovir. Detection of these mutations represents a tool for the management of patients with ganciclovir therapy.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

Cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia-guided early treatment with ganciclovir versus ganciclovir at engraftment after allogeneic marrow transplantation: a randomized double-blind study.

To determine whether cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemiaguided ganciclovir treatment may be as effective, may require less treatment, and thus may cause less marrow toxicity than ganciclovir administered at engraftment, 226 marrow transplant recipients were randomized at engraftment to receive placebo (antigenemia-ganciclovir group) or ganciclovir (ganciclovir group) until day 100 in a double-blind study. In patients with antigenemia of 3 or more positive cells in 2 slides and/or viremia, study drug was discontinued and ganciclovir was started for at least 3 weeks or until negative CMV antigenemia and resumed only if antigenemia recurred. More patients in the antigenemia-ganciclovir group developed CMV disease before day 100 after transplantation compared with the ganciclovir group (14% v 2.7%, P = .002). Of the 16 patients with CMV disease before day 100 in the antigenemia-ganciclovir group, 10 (8.8%) had disease before or during the first episode of antigenemia and 6 (5.3%) developed disease after discontinuation of ganciclovir. Untreated low-grade antigenemia progressed to CMV disease in 19% of patients with grade 3-4 compared with 0% of patients with grade 0-2 acute graft-versus-host disease (P = .04). There was no significant difference in CMV disease by day 180 after transplantation and thereafter. CMV-related death, transplant survival, and neutropenia were not significantly different between the groups. In the ganciclovir group, more invasive fungal infections occurred (P = .03) and more ganciclovir was used (P < .0001). Thus, delaying the start of ganciclovir until highgrade antigenemia and discontinuing ganciclovir based on negative antigenemia results in more CMV disease by day 100 than ganciclovir administered at engraftment. However, ganciclovir at engraftment is associated with more early invasive fungal infections and more late CMV disease resulting in similar survival rates.

Adolescent↗

Treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis with a sustained-release ganciclovir implant. The Ganciclovir Implant Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Sustained-release, intraocular implants that deliver ganciclovir are an alternative method for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). METHODS: We conducted a randomized study of 188 patients with AIDS and newly diagnosed cytomegalovirus retinitis. The patients were randomly assigned to treatment with an implant delivering 1 microg of ganciclovir per hour, an implant delivering 2 microg of ganciclovir per hour, or intravenous ganciclovir. The primary outcome we studied was progression of cytomegalovirus retinitis. RESULTS: The median time to progression of retinitis was 221 days with the 1-microg-per-hour implant (75 eyes), 191 days with the 2-microg-per-hour implant (71 eyes), and 71 days with ganciclovir administered intravenously (76 eyes; P<0.001). The risk of progression of retinitis was almost three times as great among patients treated with intravenous ganciclovir as among those treated with a ganciclovir implant (risk ratio, 2.8; P<0.001). However, the risk of disease in the initially uninvolved eye was lower with intravenous ganciclovir than with a ganciclovir implant (risk ratio, 0.5; P=0.19). Patients treated with intravenous ganciclovir were also less likely to have extraocular cytomegalovirus infections (0, vs. 10.3 percent in the two implant groups; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis, the sustained-release ganciclovir implant is more effective than intravenous ganciclovir, but patients treated with a ganciclovir implant alone remain at greater risk for the development of cytomegalovirus disease outside of the treated eye.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

Randomized controlled trial of oral ganciclovir versus oral acyclovir after induction with intravenous ganciclovir for long-term prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus disease in cytomegalovirus-seropositive liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Without effective antiviral prophylaxis, cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a common cause of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. In this randomized, controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of oral ganciclovir with oral acyclovir after induction with intravenous (IV) ganciclovir for long-term prophylaxis of CMV disease in CMV-seropositive liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Patients were initially administered IV ganciclovir at a dose of 6 mg/kg per day from day 1 to day 14 after transplantation followed by either oral ganciclovir (1 g every 8 hr) or oral acyclovir (800 mg every 6 hr) from day 15 to day 100 after transplantation. RESULTS: CMV disease occurred in only 1 of 110 patients (0.9%) receiving ganciclovir compared with 8 of 109 patients (7.3%) receiving acyclovir within the first year after transplantation (P =0.019). There was one case of CMV colitis in the ganciclovir group, whereas four cases of CMV syndrome, three cases of CMV pneumonia, and one case of CMV hepatitis developed in the acyclovir group. The only death from CMV disease occurred in an acyclovir-treated patient with CMV pneumonia. Both oral ganciclovir and oral acyclovir were generally well tolerated. Reversible leukopenia (decline in white blood cell count to <3.0 x 10(9)/L) was more common with oral ganciclovir (38/110 patients, 35%) than with oral acyclovir (20/109 patients, 18%) (P =0.009). The emergence of ganciclovir-resistant strains of CMV was not found during the study. CONCLUSIONS: A prophylactic regimen of 2 weeks of IV ganciclovir followed by an additional 12 weeks of oral ganciclovir is superior to a similar regimen of IV ganciclovir followed by oral acyclovir and almost completely eliminates CMV disease after liver transplantation. This superior protection against CMV disease extends up to 1 year after transplantation and is not associated with ganciclovir resistance.

Acyclovir↗

Randomized controlled trial of sequential intravenous and oral ganciclovir versus prolonged intravenous ganciclovir for long-term prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus disease in high-risk cytomegalovirus-seronegative liver transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus-seropositive donors.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative liver transplant recipients with CMV-seropositive donors have the greatest risk for CMV disease. We performed a randomized, controlled trial comparing sequential intravenous (IV) and oral ganciclovir with prolonged IV ganciclovir for long-term prophylaxis of CMV disease in these high-risk patients. Patients were initially given IV ganciclovir at a dose of 6 mg/kg per day from days 1 to 14 after transplantation. Patients then either received oral ganciclovir (1 g every 8 hr) or continued IV ganciclovir (6 mg/kg once per day on Monday-Friday of each week) from days 15 to 100 after transplantation. CMV disease occurred in 3 of 32 patients (9.3%) receiving oral ganciclovir and in 4 of 32 patients (12.5%) receiving IV ganciclovir within the first year after transplantation (P>0.2). All cases of CMV disease occurred more than 90 days after transplantation (median time of onset day +137 for oral ganciclovir and day +135 for IV ganciclovir). There were no deaths from CMV in either study group. Both oral and IV ganciclovir were generally well tolerated. These results indicate that, after induction with 14 days of IV ganciclovir, oral ganciclovir can be as effective as IV ganciclovir for long-term prophylaxis of CMV disease in high-risk CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with CMV-seropositive donors and eliminates the need for prolonged IV access.

Administration, Oral↗

Intravenous versus oral ganciclovir: European/Australian comparative study of efficacy and safety in the prevention of cytomegalovirus retinitis recurrence in patients with AIDS. The Oral Ganciclovir European and Australian Cooperative Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral ganciclovir for the maintenance treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in patients with AIDS. DESIGN: A 20-week, randomized, multicentre, open-label study. Progression of retinitis was assessed by funduscopy and masked reading of fundus photographs. METHODS: Adult patients with AIDS and stable CMV retinitis following a 2-3 week induction course of intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg every 12 h) were randomized 2:1 to receive maintenance therapy with oral ganciclovir 500 mg six times daily, or 5 mg/kg intravenous ganciclovir once daily infused over 1 h. The primary efficacy variable was time to progression of CMV retinitis from initiation of maintenance therapy. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients were enrolled; 112 received oral ganciclovir and 47 intravenous ganciclovir. By masked assessment of fundus photographs, CMV retinitis progressed in 72% of patients in the oral group and 76% in the intravenous group. Mean time to progression was 51 days with oral ganciclovir and 62 days with intravenous ganciclovir (P = 0.15). By funduscopy, CMV retinitis progressed in 59% of oral ganciclovir patients and 43% of intravenous ganciclovir patinets. Mean time to progression was 86 and 109 days, respectively (P = 0.02). Diarrhoea and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 500 x 10(6)/l) were the most frequently reported adverse events in both groups. The incidence of spesis for the oral and intravenous ganciclovir patients was 3 and 8.5%, respectively. Infection at the intravenous site occurred in 0 and 9% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Oral ganciclovir offers an effective and safe alternative to intravenous ganciclovir in the maintenance therapy of CMV retinitis.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

Oral ganciclovir as maintenance treatment for cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS. Syntex Cooperative Oral Ganciclovir Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus retinitis, a sight-threatening infection associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), currently requires lifelong intravenous treatment. An effective oral treatment would be an important advance. METHODS: We compared oral with intravenous ganciclovir in an open-label, randomized study in patients with AIDS and newly diagnosed, stable cytomegalovirus retinitis (the disease was stabilized by three weeks of treatment with intravenous ganciclovir). Sixty subjects were randomly assigned to maintenance therapy with intravenous ganciclovir at a dose of 5 mg per kilogram of body weight daily, and 63 to maintenance therapy with oral ganciclovir at a dose of 3000 mg daily. The subjects were followed for up to 20 weeks, with photography of the fundi conducted every other week. The photographs were evaluated at the completion of the study by an experienced grader who was unaware of the subjects' treatment assignments. RESULTS: Efficacy could be evaluated in 117 subjects; photographs were ungradable for 2 of the 117. On the basis of the masked assessment of photographs from 115 subjects, the mean time to the progression of retinitis was 62 days in those given intravenous ganciclovir and 57 days in those given oral ganciclovir (P = 0.63; relative risk [oral vs. intravenous], 1.08; 95 percent confidence interval for the difference in means, -22 to +12 days). On the basis of funduscopy by ophthalmologists who were aware of the subjects' treatment assignments, the mean time to progression was 96 days in subjects given intravenous ganciclovir and 68 days in subjects given oral ganciclovir (P = 0.03; relative risk [oral vs. intravenous], 1.68; 95 percent confidence interval for the difference in means, -45 to -11 days). Survival, changes in visual acuity, the incidence of viral shedding, and the incidence of adverse gastrointestinal events were similar in the two groups. Neutropenia, anemia, intravenous-catheter-related adverse events, and sepsis were more common in the group given intravenous ganciclovir. CONCLUSIONS: Oral ganciclovir is safe and effective as maintenance therapy for cytomegalovirus retinitis and is more convenient for patients to take than intravenous ganciclovir.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

Ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus clinical isolates: mode of resistance to ganciclovir.

Cytomegalovirus strains with reduced in vitro susceptibilities to ganciclovir have been recovered from patients who failed long-term ganciclovir therapy. The ganciclovir-resistant clinical isolates in this study were unable to induce ganciclovir phosphorylation in virus-infected cells. The viral DNA polymerase function appeared unaltered in one genetically pure ganciclovir-resistant strain, compared with that of its wild-type ganciclovir-sensitive counterpart. All nine of the ganciclovir-resistant strains were susceptible to foscarnet. Moreover, these strains were sensitive to inhibition both by vidarabine and 1-(2'-deoxy-2'-fluoro-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl)-5-iodocytosine (FIAC), antiviral agents that are activated by cellular enzymes, and by (S)-1(3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)cytosine (HPMPC), which is a monophosphate nucleoside analog. The in vitro resistance to ganciclovir of the ganciclovir-resistant clinical isolates studied was attributed to the inability of the cells infected with these isolates to phosphorylate ganciclovir; the virally encoded DNA polymerase did not appear to play a role in this ganciclovir resistance.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir after oral valganciclovir versus intravenous ganciclovir in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients with graft-versus-host disease of the gastrointestinal tract.

The pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir after oral valganciclovir versus intravenous ganciclovir were compared in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients with stable graft-versus-host disease of the gastrointestinal tract. Twenty-two evaluable adult patients were randomized to receive a single dose of open-label study drug (900 mg of oral valganciclovir or 5 mg/kg of intravenous ganciclovir). After a washout period of 2 to 7 days, patients were crossed over to receive the alternate study drug. Ganciclovir and valganciclovir concentrations in plasma were measured over 24 hours after dosing. Noninferiority of 900 mg of valganciclovir relative to intravenous ganciclovir was concluded if the lower limit of the 1-sided 95% confidence interval of the ratio of least-square means of the ganciclovir area under the curve (AUC) for the 2 study drugs was >80%. Valganciclovir was found to be rapidly absorbed and converted into ganciclovir. The ganciclovir exposure after 900 mg of valganciclovir noninferior to that of intravenous ganciclovir (AUC0-infinity, 52.1 and 53.8 microg.h/mL, respectively; 95% confidence interval of the ratio of least square means of AUC0-infinity, 82.48%-118.02%). Oral valganciclovir could be a useful alternative to intravenous ganciclovir in certain stable stem cell transplant patients who require prophylaxis or preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus infection.

Administration, Oral↗

Randomised trial of efficacy and safety of oral ganciclovir in the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in liver-transplant recipients. The Oral Ganciclovir International Transplantation Study Group [corrected].

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a frequent cause of serious morbidity after solid-organ transplantation. The prophylactic regimens used to prevent CMV infection and disease have shown limited benefit in seronegative recipients. We studied the safety and efficacy of oral ganciclovir in the prevention of CMV disease following orthotopic liver transplantation. METHODS: Between December, 1993, and April, 1995, 304 liver-transplant recipients were randomised to receive oral ganciclovir 1000 mg or matching placebo three times a day. Seronegative recipients of seronegative livers were excluded. Study drug was administered as soon as the patient was able to take medication by mouth (no later than day 10) until the 98th day after transplantation. Patients were assessed at specified times throughout the first 6 months after surgery for evidence of CMV infection, CMV disease, rejection, opportunistic infections, and possible drug toxicity. FINDINGS: The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the 6-month incidence of CMV disease was 29 (18.9%) of 154 in the placebo group, compared with seven (4.8%) of 150 in the ganciclovir group (p < 0.001). In the high-risk group of seronegative recipients (R-) of seropositive livers (D+), incidence of CMV disease was 11 (44.0%) of 25 in the placebo group, three (14.8%) of 21 in the ganciclovir group (p = 0.02). Significant benefit was also observed in those receiving antibodies to lymphocytes, where the incidence of CMV disease was 12 (32.9%) of 37 in the placebo group and two (4.6%) of 44 in the ganciclovir group (p = 0.002). Oral ganciclovir reduced the incidence of CMV infection (placebo 79 [51.5%] of 154; ganciclovir 37 [24.5%] of 150; p < 0.001) and also reduced symptomatic herpes-simplex infections (Kaplan-Meier estimates: placebo 36 [23.5%] of 154; ganciclovir five [3.5%] of 150; p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Oral ganciclovir is a safe and effective method for the prevention of CMV disease after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Administration, Oral↗

Oral ganciclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in persons with AIDS. Roche Cooperative Oral Ganciclovir Study Group.

BACKGROUND: In the advanced stages of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease, particularly vision-damaging retinitis due to CMV is common. We evaluated prophylactic treatment with orally administered ganciclovir as a way to prevent CMV disease. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of CMV infected persons with AIDS with either CD4+ lymphocyte counts of < or = 50 per cubic millimeter or counts of < or = 100 per cubic millimeter in those with a history of an AIDS defining opportunistic infection. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive either oral ganciclovir (1000 mg three times daily) or placebo. RESULTS: The study was stopped after a median 367 days of follow-up. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the twelve month cumulative rates of confirmed CMV disease were 26 percent in the placebo group (n = 239) and 14 percent in the ganciclovir group (n = 486), representing an overall reduction in risk of 49 percent in the ganciclovir group (P < 0.001). The incidence of CMV retinitis after 12 months was 24 percent in the placebo group and 12 percent in the ganciclovir group (P < 0.0001). The prevalence of CMV-positive urine cultures at base line was 42 percent; after two months it was 43 percent in the placebo group and 10 percent in the ganciclovir group (P < 0.0001). The one year mortality rate was 26 percent in the placebo group and 21 percent in the ganciclovir group (P = 0.14). Therapy with granulocyte colony stimulating factor was more frequent in the ganciclovir group (24 percent) than in the placebo group (9 percent). CONCLUSIONS: In persons with advanced AIDS, phophylactic oral ganciclovir significantly reduces the risk of CMV disease.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

Effect of oral acyclovir or ganciclovir therapy after preemptive intravenous ganciclovir therapy to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in cytomegalovirus seropositive renal and liver transplant recipients receiving antilymphocyte antibody therapy.

BACKGROUND: Organ transplant recipients who are seropositive for cytomegalovirus (CMV) and who are treated with antilymphocyte antibody (ALA) therapy have a high rate of symptomatic CMV disease. The intravenous administration of ganciclovir therapy once daily during ALA therapy decreased the incidence from 24% to 10% in patients receiving ALA as an induction therapy and from 64% to 22% in those treated for rejection. The present study was undertaken to determine whether a more intensive and sustained antiviral regimen could be more effective. METHODS: From April 1995 to December 1997, all CMV seropositive renal and liver transplant recipients who received ALA therapy were treated with intravenously administered ganciclovir (5 mg/kg/day with dose adjusted for renal dysfunction) for the length of ALA therapy and then with orally administered acyclovir (400 mg three times/day) or ganciclovir (1 gm twice/day) for 3 to 4 months. The incidence of CMV viremia and of CMV disease was determined during the 6 months after completion of ALA therapy. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (35 renal and 6 liver transplant recipients) were studied. CMV disease occurred in 2 patients (4.9%), both of whom were treated for rejection; it occurred in 1 of 21 patients (4.8%) treated with orally administered acyclovir, and in 1 of 20 patients (5%) treated with orally administered ganciclovir. The only patient who developed CMV disease in the ganciclovir group had received only 26 days of oral antiviral therapy. No CMV disease was documented in the group of patients receiving ALA therapy as induction therapy. CMV viremia occurred in three patients in the acyclovir group (14.3%) and in one patient in the ganciclovir group (5%). Among renal transplant recipients only, 1 of 35 patients developed CMV disease (2.9%) and no case of CMV disease was documented in patients treated with orally administered ganciclovir. All six patients receiving two courses of ALA therapy each were free of CMV disease. Toxicity of the regimen was minimal, and antiviral resistance did not develop. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive antiviral therapy with intravenously administered ganciclovir during ALA therapy and then orally administered ganciclovir for 3 to 4 months provides virtually complete protection against the excessive rate of CMV disease that occurs in CMV seropositive allograft recipients receiving ALA therapy.

Acyclovir↗

Monitoring plasma levels of ganciclovir in AIDS patients receiving oral ganciclovir as maintenance therapy for CMV retinitis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether low ganciclovir serum levels in patients on maintenance oral ganciclovir therapy are associated with recurrence of CMV retinitis. METHODS: A prospective study of the plasma concentration of ganciclovir after initiation of maintenance oral ganciclovir therapy in 14 AIDS patients who had recovered from acute cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis. RESULTS: Five of the 14 patients exhibited a mean time to recurrence of 37 days. The mean trough plasma concentration of ganciclovir in these patients after 1 month of oral ganciclovir therapy, was 0.40 +/- 0.30 mg/L. Nine patients had a mean time of progression of 263 days. The mean trough plasma concentration of ganciclovir in the latter patients was 0.80 +/- 0.60 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Patients exhibiting trough plasma levels of ganciclovir below 0.6 mg/L may be at higher risk of progression than patients who exhibited levels above 0.6 mg/L.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

Comparison of intravenous ganciclovir followed by oral acyclovir with intravenous ganciclovir alone for prevention of cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus disease after liver transplantation in children.

A randomized trial was performed to compare the sequential use of 2 weeks of intravenous ganciclovir (10 mg/[kg.d]) followed by 50 weeks of high-dose oral acyclovir (800 mg/m2 four times daily) with 2 weeks of intravenous ganciclovir alone as prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) disease after pediatric liver transplantation. CMV disease was diagnosed for seven of 24 patients treated with ganciclovir followed by high-dose oral acyclovir compared with two of 24 children treated with ganciclovir alone (P = .048). Similarly, the rate of CMV disease among high-risk patients (CMV-positive donor/CMV-negative recipient) treated with the combination regimen was higher than that among high-risk patients treated with ganciclovir alone (four [57%] of seven vs. zero of five, respectively; vs P < .05). The rate of EBV disease among patients treated with the combination regimen (eight [33%] of 24) was similar to that among patients treated with ganciclovir alone (five [21%] of 24; P = not significant). We conclude that sequential prophylaxis with 2 weeks of intravenous ganciclovir followed by 50 weeks of high-dose oral acyclovir did not decrease the frequency of CMV or EBV disease after pediatric liver transplantation when compared with 2 weeks of intravenous ganciclovir alone.

Acyclovir↗

Genotypic analysis of cytomegalovirus retinitis poorly responsive to intravenous ganciclovir but responsive to the ganciclovir implant.

PURPOSE: To determine whether cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis that responded poorly to intravenous ganciclovir therapy but responded to the ganciclovir implant was caused by virus with resistance mutations in the viral UL97 and UL54 genes. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review and laboratory-based experimental study. METHODS: Regions of the CMV UL97 and UL54 were amplified from the vitreous and analyzed for resistant mutations by a combination of DNA sequencing and restriction digestion. Vitreous from patients with AIDS and retinal infections other than CMV retinitis served as negative controls. RESULTS: We amplified all target regions of UL97 DNA and most target regions of UL54 DNA from eight eyes with CMV retinitis. In one eye we found a ganciclovir resistance mutation at base 1781 of the UL97 gene, predicting an alanine to valine mutation at codon 594. In a second eye we found a ganciclovir resistance mutation at base 2960 of the UL54 gene, predicting an alanine to glycine mutation at codon 987. In two additional eyes, both from patients with bilateral retinitis, we found UL54 mutations that are likely to confer resistance to ganciclovir but have not been previously described. In both of these patients the UL54 genotype differed between the two diseased eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to control CMV retinitis with intravenous ganciclovir does not necessarily imply infection with a virus having a known mutation that confers drug resistance. The ganciclovir implant can be an effective therapy for CMV retinitis caused by virus with certain UL97 and UL54 resistance mutations. Cytomegalovirus UL54 genotypes can differ between eyes in patients with bilateral retinitis.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗