Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Gabapentin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Gabapentin for drug-resistant partial epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: The majority of epileptic patients have a good prognosis and their seizures can be well controlled with the use of a single antiepileptic agent, but up to 30% develop refractory epilepsy, especially those with partial seizures. In this review we summarise the current evidence regarding a new antiepileptic drug, gabapentin, when used as an add-on treatment for drug-resistant partial epilepsy OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin when used as an add-on treatment for patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group trial register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register of The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 1998. In addition, we contacted Parke Davis (manufacturers of gabapentin) and experts in the field to seek any ongoing studies or unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized placebo controlled double blind add-on trials of gabapentin in patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted the relevant data. The following outcomes were assessed: (a) 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; (b) treatment withdrawal (any reason); (c) side effects. Primary analyses were intention to treat. Sensitivity best and worst case analyses were also undertaken. Summary odds ratios were estimated for each outcome. Dose response was evaluated in regression models, and Number Needed to Treat (NNTs) were calculated for individual doses. MAIN RESULTS: Four trials were included representing 750 randomized patients. EFFICACY: Overall odds ratio (OR) (95% Confidence Interval (CI)) for 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency compared to placebo 2.22 (1.49 - 3.32). Dose regression analysis shows increasing efficacy with increasing dose, with 28.5% (21.5 - 36.7) of patients responding to 1800mg of gabapentin compared to placebo, NNT 6.7 (3.0 - 10.5). Global effectiveness: treatment withdrawal OR (95% CI) compared to placebo 1.40 (0.76 - 2.55); Side effects: OR (99% CI) compared to placebo. dizziness 2.26 (1.28 - 3.99); fatigue 2.29 (1.11 - 4.74); somnolence 2.04 (1.21 - 3.45) were significanty associated with gabapentin. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin has efficacy as an add-on treatment in patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy. However, trials reviewed were of relatively short duration, and provide no evidence for the long term efficacy of gabapentin. Results cannot be extrapolated to monotherapy or patients with other epilepsy types.

Acetates↗
PubMed2004

XP13512 [(+/-)-1-([(alpha-isobutanoyloxyethoxy)carbonyl] aminomethyl)-1-cyclohexane acetic acid], a novel gabapentin prodrug: II. Improved oral bioavailability, dose proportionality, and colonic absorption compared with gabapentin in rats and monkeys.

The absorption of gabapentin (Neurontin) is dose-dependent and variable between patients. Rapid clearance of the drug necessitates dosing three or more times per day to maintain therapeutic levels. These deficiencies appear to result from the low capacity, limited intestinal distribution, and variable expression of the solute transporter responsible for gabapentin absorption. Saturation of this transporter at doses used clinically leads to unpredictable drug exposure and potentially ineffective therapy in some patients. XP13512 [(+/-)-1-([(alpha-isobutanoyloxyethoxy)carbonyl]aminomethyl)-1-cyclohexane acetic acid] is a novel prodrug of gabapentin designed to be absorbed by high-capacity nutrient transporters located throughout the intestine. XP13512 was efficiently absorbed and rapidly converted to gabapentin after oral dosing in rats and monkeys. Exposure to gabapentin was proportional to prodrug dose, whereas exposure to intact XP13512 was low. In rats, >95% of an oral dose of (14)C-XP13512 was excreted in urine in 24 h as gabapentin. In monkeys, oral bioavailability of gabapentin from XP13512 capsules was 84.2% compared with 25.4% after a similar oral Neurontin dose. Compared with intracolonic gabapentin, intracolonic XP13512 gave a 17-fold higher gabapentin exposure in rats and 34-fold higher in monkeys. XP13512 may therefore be incorporated into a sustained release formulation to provide extended gabapentin exposure. XP13512 demonstrated improved gabapentin bioavailability, increased dose proportionality, and enhanced colonic absorption. In clinical use, XP13512 may improve the treatment of neuropathic pain, epilepsy, and numerous other conditions by increasing efficacy, reducing interpatient variability, and decreasing frequency of dosing.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

A double-blind trial of gabapentin monotherapy for newly diagnosed partial seizures. International Gabapentin Monotherapy Study Group 945-77.

BACKGROUND: Gabapentin is widely approved as add-on therapy for epilepsy treatment for partial seizures with and without secondary generalization. To investigate the efficacy of gabapentin administered as monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy, a randomized double-blind trial was performed. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized to receive one of three masked doses of gabapentin (300, 900, or 1,800 mg/day) or open-label carbamazepine (600 mg/day) and kept daily seizure diaries throughout the study. After titration, patients entered a 24-week evaluation phase. Patients were required to exit the study if they experienced an exit event, defined as a total of three simple or complex partial seizures, one generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizure, or status epilepticus. Patients could be withdrawn for lack of efficacy, adverse events, or noncompliance. Kaplan-Meier statistics were used to estimate the probability that patients would continue in the study without having an exit event. RESULTS: Time to exit event was longer for patients on 900 mg/day (n = 72) or 1,800 mg/day (n = 74) of gabapentin than for patients receiving 300 mg/day (n = 72; p = 0.0395 and 0.0175, respectively). The most clinically relevant measure of retention on treatment (exit event plus adverse event withdrawal rate) was similar for carbamazepine (n = 74) and 1,800 mg/day gabapentin (54% versus 57%) but was lower (better) for 900 mg/day gabapentin (44%). No unexpected new adverse events emerged with gabapentin monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin at 900 or 1,800 mg/day is effective and safe as monotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy.

Acetates↗
PubMed1990

Gabapentin in partial epilepsy. UK Gabapentin Study Group.

Gabapentin is an analogue of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) which has anticonvulsant properties in animals. In a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of 1200 mg/day gabapentin as additional therapy in 127 patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy, 25% of patients who received gabapentin had the number of partial seizures at least halved, compared with 9.8% of patients given placebo. The median reduction in partial seizure frequency during 12 weeks' treatment was 29.2% with gabapentin compared with 12.5% with placebo. The mean adjusted response ratio for gabapentin (-0.192) was significantly better than the ratio of -0.060 for placebo by analysis of variance. 62% of patients who received gabapentin reported mostly mild or moderate adverse effects compared with 41% on placebo; no interactions were observed between gabapentin and other standard anticonvulsants. Gabapentin is an effective additional treatment for patients with partial epilepsy refractory to standard therapy, is fairly well tolerated, and appears to have a favourable efficacy-to-toxicity ratio.

Acetates↗
PubMed2001

[The effect of gabapentin and gabapentin-lactam on retinal ganglion cell survival. Situation after acute retinal ischemia in animal models].

BACKGROUND: Reduction in the excitatory and potentially toxic neurotransmitter glutamate can protect retinal ganglion cells. What are the effects of the antiepileptic drug gabapentin, for which antiglutamatergic effects have been described, and the new substance gabapentin-lactam (GBP-L) on retinal ganglion cell survival after retinal ischemia? METHODS: In 3 groups of 10 rats each, ischemia was induced by elevating the intraocular pressure of the left eye to 120 mmHg for 1 h. Saline, gabapentin (2 x 50 mg/kg intraperitoneally) and GBP-L (2 x 50 mg/kg intraperitoneally) were injected before and 5 h after ischemia. Two weeks later ischemic damage was quantified histologically by counting the number of neurons in the ganglion cell layer. In vitro transmitter release experiments were performed to obtain information on the effect of gabapentin and GBP-L on ischemia-induced glutamate release and the mechanism of action of GBP-L. RESULTS: In the control group 17% of the retinal ganglion cells survived ischemia. GBP-L doubled the number of the surviving cells while gabapentin was not effective in these experiments. In vitro gabapentin and GBP-L reduced ischemia-induced glutamate release by 35.7% and 42.5%, respectively. The blockade of ATP-sensitive potassium channels antagonized the effect of GBP-L completely. CONCLUSION: GBP-L is neuroprotective in retinal ischemia and diminishes the release of the excitatory neurotoxic amino acid glutamate. The effect of GBP-L might be mediated by ATP-sensitive potassium channels. Also gabapentin reduced glutamate release but was not neuroprotective in vivo.

Acetates↗
PubMed1994

The long-term safety and efficacy of gabapentin (Neurontin) as add-on therapy in drug-resistant partial epilepsy. The US Gabapentin Study Group.

This is the 2-year interim report of results from a multicenter, open-label study evaluating the long-term efficacy and safety of gabapentin (Neurontin) as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures who had had a therapeutic response to gabapentin in a preceding 12-week double-blind trial or 12-week open-label extension. A total of 240 patients continued to receive gabapentin as add-on therapy at dosages of 600-2400 mg/day for an average of 342 days (range 10-784 days). Efficacy analyses compared seizure frequency during consecutive 12-week treatment periods with seizure frequency during the 12-week baseline. During the nine treatment periods evaluated, the percent of patients with a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency ranged from 35% to 71%, and the median percent change in seizure frequency ranged from -33% to -60%. At the time of data cutoff, 30% of patients had withdrawn from the study due to lack of efficacy, and 4% due to adverse events. In 225 patient-years of gabapentin treatment in this study, CNS adverse events reported by more than 10% of patients were nystagmus, somnolence, diplopia, tremor, ataxia, and dizziness. No consistent changes in clinical laboratory values were associated with gabapentin. Gabapentin as add-on therapy at dosages up to 2400 mg/day is safe during long-term treatment in patients with refractory partial seizures. Subgroup analyses of patients who remained in the study over the long term confirmed that gabapentin maintained efficacy for up to 2 years.

Acetates↗
PubMed2000

Gabapentin in bipolar disorder: a placebo-controlled trial of adjunctive therapy. Gabapentin Bipolar Disorder Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: [corrected] To assess efficacy and safety of gabapentin in the treatment of bipolar disorder. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adjunctive gabapentin (dosed flexibly between 900 and 3,600 mg/day). Patients with a lifetime diagnosis of bipolar disorder (type I), and who were currently suffering from symptoms of either mania, hypomania or a mixed state despite ongoing therapy with lithium, valproate, or lithium and valproate in combination were eligible for inclusion. The primary efficacy measures were the baseline to endpoint change in total score on the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). RESULTS: Both treatment groups had a decrease in total YMRS from baseline to endpoint, but this decrease was significantly greater in the placebo group (-9) than the gabapentin group (-6) (p < 0.05). No difference between treatments was found for the total score on the HAM-D. Secondary efficacy measures were not different between treatment groups. More patients in the placebo group had changes made to their ongoing lithium therapy (n = 12) compared to the gabapentin group (n = 4). When these patients are removed from the efficacy analysis, the YMRS treatment difference still favors placebo, but is no longer statistically significant. Based on gabapentin plasma levels at termination, some patients did not take the study drug as prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study did not demonstrate that gabapentin is an effective adjunctive treatment when administered to outpatients with bipolar disorder.

Acetates↗
PubMed2004

Gabapentin for neuropathic cancer pain: a randomized controlled trial from the Gabapentin Cancer Pain Study Group.

PURPOSE: To determine the analgesic effect of the addition of gabapentin to opioids in the management of neuropathic cancer pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-one consecutive patients with neuropathic pain due to cancer, partially controlled with systemic opioids, participated in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-design, 10-day trial from August 1999 to May 2002. Gabapentin was titrated from 600 mg/d to 1,800 mg/d in addition to stable opioid dose. Extra opioid doses were available as needed. Zero to 10 numerical scale was used to rate average daily pain. The average pain score over the whole follow-up period was used as main outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were: intensity of burning pain, shooting/lancinating pain, dysesthesias (also scored on 0 to 10 numerical scale), number of daily episodes of lancinating pain, presence of allodynia, and daily extra doses of opioid analgesics. RESULTS: Overall, 79 patients received gabapentin and 58 (73%) completed the study; 41 patients received placebo and 31 (76%) completed the study. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) on the intent-to-treat population showed a significant difference of average pain intensity between gabapentin (pain score, 4.6) and placebo group (pain score, 5.4; P =.0250). Among secondary outcome measures, dysesthesia score showed a statistically significant difference (P =.0077; ANCOVA on modified intent-to-treat population = 115 patients with at least 3 days of pain assessments). Reasons for withdrawing patients from the trial were adverse events in six patients (7.6%) receiving gabapentin and in three patients receiving placebo (7.3%). CONCLUSION: Gabapentin is effective in improving analgesia in patients with neuropathic cancer pain already treated with opioids.

Acetates↗
PubMed1993

Gabapentin as add-on therapy in refractory partial epilepsy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. The US Gabapentin Study Group No. 5.

Gabapentin, administered as add-on therapy, was safe and effective in this 12-week, multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in 306 patients with refractory partial epilepsy. For patients in each gabapentin treatment group (600, 1,200, or 1,800 mg/d), the mean response ratio was significantly better than that of a placebo group. The percentage of patients achieving at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency was 8% among placebo-treated patients and ranged from 18% to 26% for patients who received gabapentin. Adverse events were generally mild and transient and occurred at a slightly higher frequency among patients receiving gabapentin than among those receiving placebo. Gabapentin did not affect the serum concentrations of concurrent antiepileptic drugs and was not regularly associated with any deviations in clinical laboratory values. Gabapentin's low inherent toxicity and its lack of drug interactions make it an ideal candidate for use as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial epilepsy.

Acetates↗
PubMed1998

Gabapentin add-on therapy with adaptable dosages in 610 patients with partial epilepsy: an open, observational study. The French Gabapentin Collaborative Group.

The objectives were to evaluate gabapentin add-on therapy in a large population under conditions close to real practice and to determine the therapeutic doses as reached with adaptable dosages. A 6-month multicentre, open-label study, involved addition of gabapentin to pre-existing treatment at the initial dosage of 1200 mg and subsequent adjustment between 900 and 2400 mg/day according to efficacy and tolerability. A study group of 610 adult patients, with partial epilepsy, persistent seizures and a median seizure frequency with a baseline of 7.2 per month were recruited; one-third had less than four seizures per month. Polypharmacy was frequent, with a mean of 2.3 concomitant drugs. After 6 months, 368 patients (62%) continued on gabapentin, at a mean dosage of 1739 mg/day with 44% of responders. On an intention-to-treat basis, median reduction in frequency was 21.2%, and the responder rate was 33.9%. The responder rate increased to 40.7% in the less severe subgroup receiving only one concomitant drug. Seventy-nine patients (13.4%) remained without seizures during the last evaluation period, versus nine (1.5%) during the baseline. Most of them had initially less than four seizures per month. The most frequent adverse effects, somnolence (29.3%), asthenia (14.6%), nausea (7.9%), ataxia (7.7%) and vertigo (7.2%), occurred rapidly after initial titration to 1200 mg/day, and were usually transitory. Weight gain (8.8%) seemed to be related to gabapentin dose. The combination of two recent drugs, vigabatrin and gabapentin, in 190 patients led to similar efficacy levels, with a tendency for more frequent somnolence and asthenia.

Acetates↗
PubMed2004

'Protective premedication': an option with gabapentin and related drugs? A review of gabapentin and pregabalin in in the treatment of post-operative pain.

Substantial progress has been made during the last decades in our understanding of acute pain mechanisms, and this knowledge has encouraged the search for novel treatments. Of particular interest has been the observation that tissue injury initiates a number of modulations of both the peripheral and the central pain pathways, which convert the system from a 'physiological' to a 'pathological' mode of processing afferent information. Gabapentin, which binds to the alpha(2)delta subunit of the voltage-dependent calcium channel, is active in animal models of 'pathological' but not in models of 'physiological' pain. Consequently, attention has so far been focused on neuropathic pain as a target for the clinical use of gabapentin and analogues. Recently, several reports have indicated that gabapentin may have a place in the treatment of post-operative pain. This article presents a brief summary of the potential mechanisms of post-operative pain, and a systematic review of the available data of gabapentin and pregabalin for post-operative analgesia. It is concluded that the results with gabapentin and pregabalin in post-operative pain treatment published so far are promising. It is suggested that future studies should explore the effects of 'protective premedication' with combinations of various antihyperanalgesic and analgesic drugs for post-operative analgesia.

Amines↗
PubMed2004

XP13512 [(+/-)-1-([(alpha-isobutanoyloxyethoxy)carbonyl] aminomethyl)-1-cyclohexane acetic acid], a novel gabapentin prodrug: I. Design, synthesis, enzymatic conversion to gabapentin, and transport by intestinal solute transporters.

Gabapentin is thought to be absorbed from the intestine of humans and animals by a low-capacity solute transporter localized in the upper small intestine. Saturation of this transporter at doses used clinically leads to dose-dependent pharmacokinetics and high interpatient variability, potentially resulting in suboptimal drug exposure in some patients. XP13512 [(+/-)-1-([(alpha-isobutanoyloxyethoxy)carbonyl] aminomethyl)-1-cyclohexane acetic acid] is a novel prodrug of gabapentin designed to be absorbed throughout the intestine by high-capacity nutrient transporters. XP13512 was stable at physiological pH but rapidly converted to gabapentin in intestinal and liver tissue from rats, dogs, monkeys, and humans. XP13512 was not a substrate or inhibitor of major cytochrome P450 isoforms in transfected baculosomes or liver homogenates. The separated isomers of XP13512 showed similar cleavage in human tissues. The prodrug demonstrated active apical to basolateral transport across Caco-2 cell monolayers and pH-dependent passive permeability across artificial membranes. XP13512 inhibited uptake of (14)C-lactate by human embryonic kidney cells expressing monocarboxylate transporter type-1, and direct uptake of prodrug by these cells was confirmed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. XP13512 inhibited uptake of (3)H-biotin into Chinese hamster ovary cells overexpressing human sodium-dependent multivitamin transporter (SMVT). Specific transport by SMVT was confirmed by oocyte electrophysiology studies and direct uptake studies in human embryonic kidney cells after tetracycline-induced expression of SMVT. XP13512 is therefore a substrate for several high-capacity absorption pathways present throughout the intestine. Therefore, administration of the prodrug should result in improved gabapentin bioavailability, dose proportionality, and colonic absorption compared with administration of gabapentin.

Amines↗
PubMed1997

Gabapentin monotherapy: I. An 8-day, double-blind, dose-controlled, multicenter study in hospitalized patients with refractory complex partial or secondarily generalized seizures. The US Gabapentin Study Group 88/89.

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of gabapentin administered as monotherapy in an 8-day, randomized, double-blind, dose-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study comparing dosages of 300 and 3,600 mg/d gabapentin in 82 hospitalized patients whose antiepileptic medications had been discontinued for seizure monitoring. Seizures under study were complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalization. Patients exited the study if they experienced a protocol-defined exit event indicating lack of efficacy. Time to exit was significantly longer (p = 0.0001) and completion rate was significantly higher (53% versus 17%; p = 0.002) for patients receiving 3,600 mg/d gabapentin. Gabapentin was well tolerated by patients in both dosage groups, and no patients exited the study due to adverse events, despite rapid initiation of full dose within 24 hours. These results demonstrate that gabapentin has anticonvulsant activity and is well tolerated when administered as monotherapy in patients with refractory partial seizures.

Acetates↗
PubMed1997

Gabapentin monotherapy: II. A 26-week, double-blind, dose-controlled, multicenter study of conversion from polytherapy in outpatients with refractory complex partial or secondarily generalized seizures. The US Gabapentin Study Group 82/83.

This study evaluated gabapentin monotherapy in 275 patients with medically refractory complex partial or secondarily generalized seizures who were taking one or two antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Following an 8-week baseline, patients received randomized dosages of gabapentin (600, 1,200, or 2,400 mg/d) during a 26-week double-blind phase comprising 2 weeks gabapentin add-on therapy, an 8-week AED taper, and a 16-week gabapentin monotherapy period. Patients exited the study if they experienced a protocol-defined exit event. Results of outcome measures, including time to exit, completion rate, and mean time on monotherapy, showed no significant differences among dosage groups. Possible reasons for this lack of a dose-response relationship include withdrawal seizures and the limited range of gabapentin dosages studied. Overall, 20% of patients completed the study. Completion rates were higher among patients who had discontinued one AED (23%) than two AEDs (14%), and higher among patients who were not withdrawn from carbamazepine (27%) than among those who were (16%).

Acetates↗
PubMed2000

Gabapentin versus vigabatrin as first add-on for patients with partial seizures that failed to respond to monotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, dose titration study. GREAT Study Investigators Group. Gabapentin in Refractory Epilepsy Add-on Treatment.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of gabapentin and vigabatrin as first-line add-on treatment in patients with partial epilepsy. METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized dose titration study. After baseline assessment and randomization, the dose could be increased if seizures persisted and reduced if side effects occurred. Health-related quality of life was assessed at baseline and at the end of the study. By a protocol amendment post hoc, all randomized patients were offered a standardized perimetry examination at the end of the study. Improvement rate was the proportion of patients with a reduction of seizure frequency of at least 50% during an 8-week period without any adverse events causing withdrawal. RESULTS: One hundred two patients were randomized and analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. The improvement rate was 48% in the gabapentin group and 56% in the vigabatrin group. The improvement rate, when per protocol criteria were fulfilled, was 57% in the gabapentin group and 59% in the vigabatrin group. The proportion of seizure-free patients was 31% in the gabapentin group and 39% in the vigabatrin group. There was no difference in quality-of-life scores between the groups. Perimetry after termination of the study on 64 patients showed abnormal results in 3 of 32 patients in the vigabatrin group. CONCLUSION: Approximately one third of the patients in both groups became seizure-free. Although no major differences were seen in terms of the improvement rate between the groups, equivalence between the two drugs was not found.

Acetates↗
PubMed2003

Gabapentin exposure in human pregnancy: results from the Gabapentin Pregnancy Registry.

The objective of this study was to assess the safety of gabapentin (Neurontin) exposure in human pregnancy. Prospective and retrospective data concerning 51 fetuses, including 3 twin gestations, were collected from 39 women with epilepsy and other disorders exposed to gabapentin during pregnancy. Data were collected and evaluated about the 44 live births, including maternal demographics, diagnosis, treatment and complications, and fetal complications and outcomes. The results of this study showed that the rates of maternal complication, cesarean section, miscarriage, low birth weight, and malformation were less than or similar to those seen in the general population or among women with epilepsy. Gabapentin exposure during pregnancy did not lead to an increased risk for adverse maternal and fetal events in this study. However, because of the small number of patients examined in this study, additional data from more pregnancies and outcomes are needed.

Acetates↗
PubMed2004

Gabapentin-lactam, but not gabapentin, reduces protein aggregates and improves motor performance in a transgenic mouse model of Huntington's disease.

Gabapentin (GBP), an anti-convulsant widely used in the treatment of neuropathic pain syndromes, has been suggested to have neuroprotective properties. There is evidence, however, that the neuroprotective properties attributed to GBP are rather associated with a derivative of GBP, gabapentin-lactam (GBP-L), which opens mitochondrial ATP-dependent K+ channels, in contrast to GBP. We explored whether GBP and GBP-L may attenuate the course of a monogenetic autosomal neurodegenerative disorder, Huntington's disease (HD), using a transgenic mouse model. R6/2 mice treated with GBP-L performed walking on a narrow beam better than mice receiving no treatment, vehicle or GBP, suggesting a beneficial effect of GBP-L on motor function. In addition, a marked reduction of neuronal nuclear and cytoplasmic inclusions was observed in brains of mice treated with GBP-L. The pharmacokinetics of GBP-L yielded a mean plasma concentration near the EC50 of GBP-L to open mitochondrial ATP-dependent K+ channels. These findings support the role of GBP-L as a novel neuroprotective substance in vivo.

Amines↗
PubMed1992

Selected CSF biochemistry and gabapentin concentrations in the CSF and plasma in patients with partial seizures after a single oral dose of gabapentin.

Gabapentin (GBP) is a neutral amino acid and a GABA analog which in animal experimental models has shown a broad anticonvulsant spectrum. To evaluate the penetration of GBP into the CSF in humans as well as its possible effects on free and total GABA, homovanillic acid (HVA), and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), a special investigation was performed as part of a placebo controlled add-on study of GBP in partial epilepsy. At the end of the 3-month double-blind period, 5 patients on placebo were given a single oral dose of GBP. Four patients received 600 mg and 1 patient 1200 mg GBP. CSF was collected immediately before and at 6, 24 and 72 h after the single dose. 5 ml of plasma was collected at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h. Plasma concentrations and plasma elimination half-life (4-6 h) of GBP were in agreement with the results of previous studies. The CSF/plasma concentration ratio of GBP 6 h after drug was 0.1. After 24 h, GBP could only be recovered in the CSF of the patient given 1200 mg. The CSF/plasma ratio at that time was 0.3. Free and total GABA concentrations did not change, but CSF 5-HIAA and HVA increased at 24 and 72 h post dose. The CSF/plasma ratio of gabapentin is similar to that of other amino acids.

Acetates↗