Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “GYNECOLOGY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

[Our gynecologic heritage. Robert von Olshausen (1835-1915), pioneer in surgical gynecology. 5th contribution on the history of the Berlin Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology].

Robert von Olshausen was an outstanding German gynecologist at the turn of the century and a pioneer of operative gynaecology. His fields of excellency were ovarotomy, the problems of asepsis, carcinoma therapy and the development of obstetrics in general. Under his chairmansship, the Berlin Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Universitäts-Frauenklinik) became the leading Clinic in Germany. For many years Olshausen was the chairman of the Berlin Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, since 1894 as honorary chairman. The present paper is a biography of Robert von Olshausen, showing his importance for the development of the modern gynaecology in Berlin and Germany.

Berlin↗

A comparison of complementary and alternative medicine use by gynecology and gynecologic oncology patients.

Our objective was to describe and compare the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in gynecology and gynecological oncology patients. Five hundred and twenty-nine gynecology and gynecological oncology patients completed a questionnaire regarding CAM use. Overall, 56.3% of gynecology and gynecological oncology patients reported current use of CAM. Therapies used included nutritional supplements (20%), prayer as medical therapy (17%), exercise as medical therapy (12%), megavitamins (10%), and green tea (10%). While 69.5% believed CAM to be beneficial, only 31.6% discussed these therapies with their physician. The women spent a mean of $656.22 on CAM (range $0-$7,000), with 31.7% receiving some insurance reimbursement. Gynecologic oncology patients (n = 161) used CAM significantly more than gynecology patients (n = 368) (66% vs. 52%, 95% CI = 0.046-0.230, P = 0.004). Gynecological oncology patients also spent more for CAM, with a mean expenditure of $711 versus $622 by gynecology patients. Within the gynecological oncology patient group, there were 69 patients currently receiving modern medical treatments for cancer; among these patients, 58% reported using CAM; of these, 39.3% communicated their use of CAM to their physician. Patients in this group spent an average of $1,178 on CAM during their illness, with only 6.3% receiving insurance reimbursement. Benefits from CAM were perceived by 54.5% in this group. We concluded that cancer patients have a higher usage rate and expenditure for CAM, particularly while they are receiving medical therapy, and are more likely to discuss the use of alternative therapies with their physicians. CAM was perceived as helpful by patients despite the lack of scientific data about its effect.

Adult↗

The fourth-year medical school curriculum: recommendations of the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

OBJECTIVES: The Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology have proposed a fourth-year medical school curriculum for a student interested in pursuing a residency in obstetrics and gynecology. STUDY DESIGN: Faculty members and residents in North Carolina, Illinois, and Michigan were surveyed as to the ideal curriculum that they would recommend for fourth-year students. The committee members representing the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics then reviewed these surveys and proposed a final curriculum. RESULTS: A core curriculum of general medicine as an acting internship, an intensive care unit rotation, neonatology, and emergency medicine was recommended. Additional courses strongly considered were ambulatory obstetrics-gynecology, acting internship in obstetrics-gynecology, endocrinology, and general surgery. CONCLUSION: The committee recommends a curriculum that is broad and balanced in general medical education.

Curriculum↗

[Geriatric gynecology. A contribution to geriatric gynecology with special reference to postoperative mortality].

A contribution to geriatric gynecology with special consideration of postoperative mortality. Almost imperceptibly, essential progress has been made within recent years in the field of surgical geriatric gynecology. The attempt was made, after enumerating the specific problems of geriatric gynecology, to deal systematically with surgical geriatric gynecology. From 1960 to 1969 in West-Berlin, 7151 major operations in 60-year-old women and older were performed in 17 gynecological hospitals. Complete records were available in 6658 cases. Evaluating them, we were able to substantiate effectively the clinical actuality of surgical geriatric gynecology as a component of geriatric gynecology.

Aged↗

[Obstetrics, surgical gynecology, or medical gynecology: what type of practice interests today's interns?].

INTRODUCTION: Two major modifications have recently changed the training program of interns in obstetrics and gynecology in France. The first modification is an important increase in the number of interns in OBGYN, allowing more lower ranked medical students to enter this training. The second modification is the imposed subdivision of the pool of interns in two distinctive branches: obstetrics and gynecological surgery, and medical gynecology with a 2/1 ratio. These modifications were decided without consulting interns on the type of practice they intend to have later. This study tries to determine what type of practice French interns in OBGYN intend to have when they have finished their training. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We distributed surveys to all French interns in OBGYN. The survey included questions on the type of practice they intend to have, and questions on their opinions on how OBGYN show be taught. RESULTS: Two third of interns wanted to have a full practice in OBGYN. This proportion was the same considering only first year interns. Three quarters of interns wanted to have a future practice that includes at least medical gynecology, and only one intern wanted to do solely medical gynecology later. French interns in OBGYN wanted more medical gynecology teaching during their training CONCLUSION: Despite recent modifications in the training program, French interns in OBGYN intend to have a full practice later. This choice is not influenced by the 5 years of training.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

[Surgical gynecology today and tomorrow. Leading presentation of the 13th Academic Congress of German-Speaking University Faculty in Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hannover, 16th-19th May 1993: 1: Oncology and urologic gynecology].

It is shown how in gynaecologic oncology, proceeding from former standardized techniques, an individualized multimodal therapeutic concept has been developed. New aspects are introduced concerning diagnosis and treatment in the field of operative urogynaecology. The world-wide problem of performing poorly indicated hysterectomies is also addressed. Dynamic developments in the field of out-patient surgery will become an increasing challenge in the near future, influencing obstetrics and gynaecology to an extent that cannot at present be foreseen for the middle and long range. The forced evolution of conventional and laser-assisted laparoscopic surgery resulted in a nowadays broad spectrum of laparoscopically practicable surgical interventions, which made, even if still questioned by some experts, the vaginally assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy possible.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

Have we met the educational challenges of obstetrics and gynecology? A response to the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Initiative of 1986.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the progress that has been made toward meeting the educational challenges in obstetrics and gynecology that were made at an Association of Professors of Obstetrics and Gynecology special forum in 1986. STUDY DESIGN: We placed the five major issues and specific problems that were identified within the context of developments that have occurred in medical education, the Association of Professors of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and the specialty over the last 15 years. We used the medical education literature and the accomplishments of the members of the Association of Professors of Obstetrics and Gynecology to measure progress. RESULTS: Many of the challenges that were raised at the original forum remain. Significant progress, much of it spearheaded by the Association of Professors of Obstetrics and Gynecology, has been made in the areas of teaching methods and skills, evaluation techniques, faculty development, computer usage, teaching recognition, counseling for the fourth-year student, and an integrated curriculum in women's health. CONCLUSION: Progress has occurred within the context and demands of a changing health care system that constricts the time and funding that are available for medical education.

Curriculum↗

The benefit of a special elective gynecologic oncology program for obstetrics and gynecology residents.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefit of a special elective gynecologic oncology program for Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents. METHODS: We reviewed our housestaff records from July 1992 to June 1998 and the National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) subspeciality match results for gynecologic oncology from its inception in 1994 to 1999. RESULTS: From July 1992 to June 1998, a total of 146 residents participated in our elective program. Of the 104 candidates who went through our program and subsequently participated in the NRMP, 55 (53%) obtained match positions. After completion of the elective, 42 of the 146 residents (29%) did not participate in the NRMP for gynecologic oncology and therefore were not eligible to obtain match appointments. During the study period, there were 255 other residents in the United States who applied for gynecologic oncology fellowship positions through the NRMP and did not participate in our program. Of these 255 candidates, 137 (54%) matched. CONCLUSION: The percentage of residents who went through our program, participated in the NRMP, and obtained fellowships did not differ significantly from the percentage of residents who matched without participating in the program. However, almost one-third of the residents who went through our program did not participate in the NRMP. The reasons for their lack of participation were not formally evaluated, but are likely related to a personal decision to pursue another carrer pathway, a decision facilitiated by their experience in our program. Therefore, it appears that the main benefits of the program are to help potential candidates decide whether or not to pursue a career in gyencologic oncology and to aid fellowship programs in identifying exceptional candidates for subspecialty training.

Fellowships and Scholarships↗

[Our gynecologic heritage. The activities of scientific gynecologic societies in Northeast Germany after the World War II].

During the Second World War and especially since 1943 the activities of medical societies decreased more and more. The first gynecological meeting in the of Soviets occupied part of Germany happened October 5th till 6th 1946 in Jena. The Chairman was Gustav Döderlein. In May 1947 the Soviet Military Administration commanded the order Nr. 124 about foundation of medical societies. The Society of Gynecology at the University of Rostock was founded November 1947. In year 1948 was the unification with the Gynecological Society of Greifswald. The unified society organized till 1989 more than 40 meetings in the Northern towns of East Germany. 1991 the unification with the Northwestern Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics took place. The Society has now the name "North-German Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology".

Female↗

Pragmatic gynecologic cancer clinical trials: statements and roadmap from the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup Chicago Brainstorming Meeting.

Randomized controlled trials remain fundamental to evidence generation in oncology but are increasingly complex, costly, and often misaligned with real-world practice. Traditional explanatory trials, designed under ideal, controlled conditions, frequently enroll highly selected populations, limiting generalizability and underrepresenting key groups such as older adults, patients with comorbidities, and those from low- and middle-income countries. Pragmatic clinical trials offer an alternative by evaluating interventions under routine care conditions, with broader eligibility, simplified procedures, and patient-centered outcomes. To address these challenges, the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup convened an international brainstorming meeting in May 2025 with multi-disciplinary experts, patients, and advocates to define priorities and develop a roadmap for pragmatic trials in gynecologic oncology. Key discussions emphasized embedding trial design within routine care, aligning eligibility criteria and procedures with standard practice, minimizing non-essential data collection, and prioritizing outcomes meaningful to patients, including quality of life. Innovative designs such as registry-based randomized trials, trials-within-cohorts, and cluster randomization were highlighted as feasible approaches to improve efficiency while preserving internal validity. Integration of patient-reported outcomes and real-world data was considered achievable when carefully streamlined. Major challenges identified included regulatory heterogeneity, consent complexity, data interoperability, and funding limitations, particularly in multi-national settings. Proposed solutions include simplified consent models, centralized ethics processes, hybrid funding strategies, and the responsible use of artificial intelligence to enhance patient identification, recruitment, and potential development of synthetic control arms. Patient engagement was recognized as essential to ensure relevance, feasibility, and equity. Incorporation of patient-reported outcomes was discussed as key to informing acceptance and tolerability. In summary, pragmatic trials within Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup represent a critical pathway to generate efficient, inclusive, and practice-changing evidence in gynecologic cancers across diverse health care settings.

Humans↗

Validity and utility of the PRIME-MD patient health questionnaire in assessment of 3000 obstetric-gynecologic patients: the PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire Obstetrics-Gynecology Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of mental disorders among obstetric-gynecologic patients and to assess the validity and utility of the PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) in this population. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 3000 patients were assessed by 63 clinicians at seven obstetrics-gynecology outpatient care sites. The main outcome measures were PRIME-MD PHQ diagnoses, psychosocial stressors, independent diagnoses made by mental health professionals, functional status measures, disability days, health care use, and treatment or referral decisions. RESULTS: Current mental disorders were fairly prevalent, present in 1 in 5 obstetric-gynecologic patients. Patients with PRIME-MD PHQ diagnoses had more functional impairment, disability days, health care use, and psychosocial stressors than did patients without PRIME-MD PHQ diagnoses (P <.005 for all measures). Although most clinicians judged the PRIME-MD PHQ to be useful in management decisions, the questionnaire diagnosis of mental disorder rarely led to therapeutic intervention. CONCLUSION: The PRIME-MD PHQ is a useful instrument for the assessment of mental disorders, functional impairment, and recent psychosocial stressors in the busy obstetrics-gynecology setting.

Adolescent↗