SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “GFAP”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Bi-compartmental CSF-serum analysis of NfL and GFAP differentiates central and peripheral pathology in neuroinfectious diseases: A monocentric real-world cohort study.

Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), established biomarkers of neuroaxonal injury and astroglial pathology, are frequently only assessed in blood, which limits conclusions regarding their origin. Bi-compartmental analyses of CSF and serum may help differentiate central or peripheral origin of biomarker elevation. Moreover, studies on NfL and GFAP in distinct neuroinfectious disease (NID) phenotypes, particularly those based on real-world cohorts, are limited. This retrospective monocentric study analyzed CSF and serum from patients with (meningo-)encephalitis/myelitis (TI+; n = 48), meningitis (TI-; n = 80), (cranial) nerve palsies/polyradiculitis (PND; n = 61), and 113 non-neuroinflammatory/non-neurodegenerative controls. A bi-compartmental model using scatter plots and simple linear regression was applied to assess the origin of blood biomarker levels and discriminate between central and peripheral pathology. CSF and serum NfL and GFAP z-scores were significantly higher in TI+ compared with TI- (CSF-GFAP p < 0.001/sGFAP p = 0.0083; CSF-NfL p = 0.003/sNfL p = 0.0004). TI+ and PND differed only in GFAP levels, which were higher in TI+ (CSF-GFAP p = 0.0049/sGFAP p = 0.003). The overall group effect (p ≤ 0.003) and principal findings remained significant after adjustment for age, sex, QAlb, and time since (symptom) onset to LP. Bi-compartmental analysis revealed simultaneous elevation of CSF and serum NfL in TI+, indicating predominantly central origin, whereas PND demonstrated a shift toward higher sNfL levels suggesting peripheral origin. Higher clinical severity (modified Rankin Scale 3-5) was associated with elevated serum and CSF GFAP and NfL (sGFAP p = 0.012/sNfL p = 0.002; CSF-GFAP p < 0.0001/CSF-NfL p = 0.0001), which also predicted unfavorable outcome at discharge (sGFAP p = 0.006/sNfL p = 0.004; CSF-GFAP p = 0.003/CSF-NfL p = 0.012). NfL and GFAP were associated with brain/myelon involvement in NID, predominantly reflecting central pathology. Despite strong CSF-serum correlations, bi-compartmental approaches provide additional insight into biomarker origin and disease compartment.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Prognostic effect of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light chain for predicting progression independent of relapse activity in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) is increasingly appreciated as one of the important factors contributing to disability accumulation in MS. sGFAP and sNfL could represent markers reflecting two separate biological processes related to relapse-independent progression in MS. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the literature on blood GFAP and/or NfL measured in relation to PIRA or other similar relapse-independent progression endpoints in people with MS. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 1 June 2026. The eligible studies were original human studies measuring blood GFAP and/or NfL concentrations in serum, plasma, or any other type of blood-derived material and assessing PIRA, PIRMA, CDP/CDW without relapses, relapse-free EDSS progression, non-inflammatory progression, or comparable relapse-independent disability worsening outcomes. Methodological quality was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the QUIPS instrument for bias detection in the body of evidence on prognostic factors. Due to heterogeneity of outcomes, biomarker measurements and effect estimates, results were synthesized qualitatively rather than quantitatively. RESULTS: After removing duplicates, 1206 records were screened, followed by full-text review of 120 reports. A total of 18 reports were included. Overall, sGFAP was associated more frequently with PIRA or PIRA-like disability progression, particularly in cohorts with suppressed or limited overt inflammatory activity. Evidence for sNfL was more variable and context-dependent: several studies reported associations with PIRA-like or relapse-independent disability worsening when acute inflammatory activity was absent, suppressed, or analytically separated, whereas other studies reported negative or inconclusive findings. Negative or inconclusive results were reported by several articles, particularly when broad outcomes were evaluated or the study population was small. CONCLUSION: Blood GFAP and NfL give complementary but non-interchangeable information concerning PIRA in MS patients. The existing evidence base does not allow us to perform meta-analysis because of heterogeneity in terms of outcomes, standardization of biomarkers, and treatment context. Further prospective investigations with uniform criteria will be necessary for their use as biomarkers of PIRA in clinical settings.

Humans↗