Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Formoterol Fumarate”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Sustained improvement in asthma with long-term use of formoterol fumarate.

Inhaled formoterol fumarate, a long acting beta 2 agonist, produces bronchodilatation that is sustained for approximately 12 hours. To determine whether such bronchodilator effects are maintained and asthma control sustained during chronic administration, we monitored airflow indices and clinical control in 112 asthmatic patients who self administered formoterol twice daily for periods ranging from 9 to 12 months. Subjects were recruited immediately following completion of a 3-month double-blind comparison of formoterol, 12 micrograms, bid versus salbutamol, 200 micrograms, qid. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months, where baseline represents the final visit of the 3-month comparative study. Patients were asked to complete diary cards and twice daily PEFR for a 2-week period before each assessment. Throughout the follow-up study, there was no indication of worsening of asthma control or deteriorating lung function. For the patients who continued to receive formoterol, the previous improvement in asthma control and lung function was maintained at the level reached in the 3-month study. There was an improvement in flow rates and asthma symptoms in the group switched from salbutamol to formoterol by the first clinic visit. This improvement in asthma control and lung function was maintained over the subsequent 6 months. Formoterol was well tolerated during the study period. We conclude that prolonged use of formoterol fumarate twice daily results in sustained improvement in symptoms and flow rates in asthma with no evidence of tachyphylaxis.

Adolescent↗

Optimization and validation of a gas chromatographic method for analysis of (RS,SR)-diastereoisomeric impurity in formoterol fumarate.

A gas chromatographic method for the determination of formoterol (RS,SR)-diastereoisomer, a process impurity, in formoterol fumarate was optimized and validated. The method involves silylation of formoterol fumarate with N-(trimethylsilyl)imidazole in N,N-dimethylformamide at room temperature in an autosampler vial to produce trimethylsilyl derivatives of the enantiomers prior to GC analysis. The optimized silylation and separation conditions, respectively, produced good yield and resolution of the analytes. The method appears to be convenient and fast, and permits accurate determination of (RS,SR)-diastereoisomer in formoterol fumarate with adequate precision (R.S.D. = 3.0%, n = 9) and sensitivity (DL < 0.01%) when compared with the official liquid chromatographic limit test method of Pharmeuropa. The method was successfully applied to quality control of commercial formoterol fumarate for their (RS,SR)-diastereoisomer contents.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

Thermodynamic stability and crystal structures for polymorphs and solvates of formoterol fumarate.

Polymorph screening of formoterol fumarate was performed in 12 solvents, followed by evaluations of thermodynamic stability. Three anhydrates, a dihydrate, a diethanolate, a diisopropanolate, and a dibensylalcoholate were found. The crystal structure of three solvated modifications and of the most stable anhydrate was investigated. This indicated that solvation is needed to get a stable and well packed crystal structure. Thermodynamic testing suggests that five crystal modifications are thermodynamically stable, at different conditions, since they are all reversibly related to each other.

2-Propanol↗

Effects of ethylcellulose and 2-octyldodecanol additives on skin permeation and irritation with ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer matrix patches containing formoterol fumarate.

Skin permeation of formoterol fumarate (FF) and irritation with ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer matrix patches was investigated using rat and human skin in vitro and different species of experimental animal, respectively. Skin permeation of FF increased remarkably without addition of ethylcellulose (EC) and was remarkably enhanced by incorporation of 2-octyldodecanol (OD) instead of hydrogenated rosin glycerol ester (Ester Gum H). Effects on skin permeation of FF with EVA matrix patches were similar in rat and human skin, but rat skin was 1000 times more permeable than human skin after 24 h. The primary irritation indices for matrix patches without EC and with EC (OD-0), EC and 0.5 mg OD per square centimeter (OD-0.5), and EC and 1.0 mg OD per square centimeter (OD-1) were 1.46, 1.13,1.29 and 1.38. The results suggested that the irritation induced by these patches was rather mild, but significantly greater than the 0.21 observed with the control. No significant effects were noted for either EC or OD alone. Skin irritation intensity with EVA matrix patches was observed to be in the order of rabbits, guinea pigs, rats and miniature swine.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

Validation of a RP-HPLC method for the assay of formoterol and its related substances in formoterol fumarate dihydrate drug substance.

A stability-indicating reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method has been developed and validated for the assay of formoterol fumarate and the related substances, namely, formoterol fumarate desformyl and formoterol fumarate acetamide analogs, in the active pharmaceutical ingredient. The separation was achieved by isocratic elution using an Alltech Alltima C18 (150 x 4.6 mm) column, a mobile phase consisting of ammonium acetate (50 mM; pH 5.0)-ethanol (65:35, v/v), a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min and UV detection at 242 nm. The detection and quantitation limits were 0.03 and 08 microg/ml, respectively, while the linear range of detection was between 0.03 and 255 microg/ml. Comparative determinations of formoterol fumarate in three lots of bulk drugs using the proposed HPLC method and the standard potentiometric titration method of pharmacopoeia show that both methods are equivalent for pure drug substance assay. However, the HPLC method allowed the separation and quantitation of the impurities not achievable with the official methods in the bulk drugs. This study shows that the proposed method is accurate, linear, and sensitive as stability indicating assay method for formoterol fumarate in the bulk drug.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗

Disposition and metabolism of formoterol fumarate, a new bronchodilator, in rats and dogs.

1. The disposition and metabolism of formoterol fumarate, a highly potent beta 2-adrenoceptor stimulant, were studied in rats and dogs. 2. After oral administration of [3H] formoterol fumarate to dogs, unchanged formoterol accounted for greater than 60% of the plasma radioactivity immediately after dosage; greater than 20% was due to the unchanged drug until 12 h after dosage. In contrast, only 1-3% of the radioactivity was present as unchanged drug in rat plasma. After i.v. dosage, unchanged drug was much higher in both species. The elimination half-life of formoterol was 4-6 h in dogs and 1.7 h in rats. 3. In both species, 36-45% of the dose was excreted in urine and 50-56% in faeces in 72 h, irrespective of the administration route. Biliary excretion after oral dosage amounted to 65 and 31% in rats and dogs, respectively. 4. T.l.c. before and after enzymic hydrolysis revealed that the drug was excreted in urine and bile of rats mostly as a conjugate. Dog urine also contained the conjugate but the unchanged drug was much higher than in rats. The conjugated metabolite was purified from rat urine and identified as the 2-O-glucuronide. The glucuronide was the only metabolite detected in the urine and bile of rats and in the urine of dogs.

Administration, Oral↗

Formulation and evaluation of ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer matrix patches containing formoterol fumarate.

The skin permeability and stability of formoterol fumarate (FF) in matrix patches containing l-menthol as an enhancer and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) as the solvent were investigated. Using a total of 28 matrix patches having a similar composition, containing ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) as the forming polymer and hydrogenated rosin glycerol ester (Ester Gum H) as the adhesive, the skin permeation of FF was found to increase with increasing l-menthol and NMP contents. FF in the matrix patches containing NMP in the range of 4.8-7.2% was stable, but stability decreased at higher values. With a standard matrix patch containing FF, the Cmax and AUC(0-24) values were found to be 1.93 ng/ml after 4 h percutaneous application to rats and 25.6 ng x h/ml. The bioavailability after percutaneous exposure was equivalent to 15.2% of the AUC(0-24) after intravenous administration. Percutaneous application proved efficacious with regard to control of simulated asthma at dose levels lower than those with which side effects occurred. Thus an optimized matrix patch containing FF was prepared with potential advantages for control of asthma.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

Bioequivalence of inhaled formoterol fumarate assessed from pharmacodynamic, safety and urinary pharmacokinetic data.

This paper deals with a crossover trial on healthy volunteers performed to obtain combined pharmacodynamic, safety and pharmacokinetic data in order to assess the bioequivalence of formoterol fumarate (CAS 43229-80-7) delivered by mono-dose dry powder inhalers, as test and reference. The trial was carried out on 24 Caucasian healthy male and female volunteers treated with 12 micrograms formoterol fumarate bihydrate capsules for inhalation route. Pharmacodynamics was evaluated through a challenge test with methacholine on the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Safety was achieved from glucose and potassium serum levels assayed on timed samples over a 12-h period cost-dosing and from blood pressure, heart rate and ECG recording. Pharmacokinetics was obtained from urinary excretion of formoterol, assessed by a highly sensitive analytical method (LC-MS-MS). Pharmacodynamic, safety and pharmacokinetic results evidenced the bioequivalence of the two formulations investigated. This investigation is an interesting approach how to assess bioequivalence when the classical approach based on the similarity of plasma concentrations can not be applied.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Effects of solvents on skin permeation of formoterol fumarate.

Effects of various chemicals applied as penetration enhancers on the permeation of formoterol fumarate (FF) across excised rat skin were investigated. Remarkable enhancement was noted with terpenes, fatty acid esters, and higher alcohols, whereas no significant influence was observed in the case of lower alcohols, pyrrolidones, and amines. At high concentration, a cineole/N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) mixed solvent system slightly enhanced the skin permeation of FF compared with cineole alone, and a l-menthol/NMP mixed solvent system caused significant further increase. Maximum skin permeation of FF was seen when the ratio of l-menthol/NMP was 60/40 w/w. From the present results, l-menthol/NMP and isopropyl myristate (IPM)/NMP mixed solvent systems can be considered effective for augmenting skin permeation of FF, with potential applications in transdermal delivery of the drug.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

Bronchodilatation effects of dry powder formoterol fumarate in asthmatic patients.

Ten asthmatic patients were enrolled in our study of the effects of dry powder formoterol fumarate. The onset was 2-5 minutes and a long duration of action (over 12 hours) appeared. The mean baseline FEV1 was 1.67 liters (49-74%). Mean reversibility was 17 per cent (range 15-19%). There was no adverse effect in this study.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of solid formoterol fumarate and its dihydrate.

Carbon-13 cross-polarization magic-angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of anhydrous formoterol fumarate and the dihydrate are presented, together with some relaxation time measurements. The latter enabled quantitation of mixtures of the anhydrate and dihydrate to be made. Quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance measurements were then performed on mixtures of the two forms formulated in lactose. Relative amounts of the forms could be assessed at a total formulation level of 2%, whereas the dihydrate on its own in lactose was detectable at the 0.45% level. The optimum experiment involves dipolar dephasing, because that minimizes the intensity of signals from the lactose.

Ethanolamines↗

Effect of formoterol fumarate treatment on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children.

BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is common, particularly in children. OBJECTIVES: To compare the protective effect of single doses of formoterol fumarate via Aerolizer with placebo and albuterol in children with EIB. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial, 23 children (aged 4-11 years) received formoterol, 12 or 24 microg; albuterol, 180 microg; or placebo at 4 separate visits. Protection against EIB was evaluated as the maximum percentage decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from the preexercise value after exercise challenge tests (6-minute treadmill) conducted 15 minutes and 4, 8, and 12 hours after administration of the dose. RESULTS: The maximum percentage decrease in FEV1 after the 4-hour exercise test (primary efficacy variable) was significantly less for formoterol, 12 and 24 microg, vs placebo (P < .001 for both) or albuterol (P = .016 and .010, respectively); albuterol was not significantly different from placebo. Formoterol, 12 and 24 microg, differed from placebo at 8 hours (P = .002 and .001, respectively), with a smaller difference between albuterol and placebo (P = .045). Rescue medication use and a high dropout rate may have biased treatment differences at later time points. Protection against EIB (<20% maximum decrease in FEV1) across all time points was observed for 17 (77%) of 22 and 17 (74%) of 23 children with formoterol, 12 and 24 microg, respectively, compared with 8 (35%) of 23 with albuterol and 6 (27%) of 22 with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Single doses of formoterol, 12 or 24 microg, are effective in protecting against EIB in children, affording a statistically significantly greater protective effect than placebo or albuterol.

Administration, Inhalation↗

[Enhanced percutaneous absorption of formoterol fumarate via pulsed iontophoresis. II. Effect of polarity, pulse frequency and duty].

To clarify the effect of polarity, pulse frequency and duty on the iontophoretic transport of formoterol fumarate (FF), in vitro and in vivo studies were performed with guinea pigs. In the in vitro studies, the flux at steady state was enhanced by the factor 7.61 with anodal iontophoresis in comparison with control, whereas, with cathodal iontophoresis it was restrained by the factor 0.79. When pulse frequency was varied from 0 to 40 kHz, the flux at steady state was enhanced with an increase in pulse frequency. In the in vivo studies with varying the duty of pulse potential from 10 to 100%, the maximum plasma concentration of FF was obtained at a 30% duty. In contrast, the plasma concentration of FF achieved at 100% duty was not high. With stripped skin, no significant difference in the plasma concentration of FF was shown between iontophoresis and control. Consequently, it is suggested that iontophoresis contributes to FF penetration across stratum corneum.

Animals↗

Pharmacokinetics and effects of formoterol fumarate in healthy human subjects after oral dosing.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of formoterol after oral administration on plasma eosinophils and plasma potassium in healthy subjects. METHODS: Plasma concentrations of formoterol, peripheral eosinophil count and plasma potassium were determined during 7 h after oral administration of 168 microg of formoterol to eight healthy subjects. Descriptions of the concentration-time course of formoterol are given using a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order absorption in four subjects and a two-compartment model in the other four subjects. Effects on potassium and eosinophils are described using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling with the 'effect-compartment' approach. RESULTS: The values of the kinetic parameters were: Ka: 6.9 (h(-1)), t1/2, 8.5 (h), AUC: 741 (pg x h(-1) x l(-1), V(area/f): 1470 (l). Formoterol concentrations were related to dynamic data using a sigmoid Emax model. CONCLUSION: Plasma concentrations of formoterol can be measured in plasma of healthy subjects after oral administration. These data can be used for describing concentration-effect relations with respect to plasma potassium and eosinophils. With comparable EC50 values for the two effects, remarkable differences were found for k(e0) and n values.

Administration, Oral↗

Formoterol dry-powder inhalation--Novartis/SkyePharma: Foradil MDDPI, Foradil MDPI, Foradil SkyeHaler, formoterol fumarate dry-powder inhalation.

In November 1998, Novartis Pharma of Switzerland and SkyePharma PLC of the UK signed an agreement to jointly develop a new formulation of the beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist formoterol (Foradil). The new product, Foradil Certihaler, utilises a multidose dry-powder inhaler (MDPI or MDDPI) device, SkyeHaler, developed by SkyePharma. It also utilises SkyePharma's SkyeProtect powder formulation technology, which protects the drug from moisture. The product is waiting for approval for the treatment of asthma. Foradil MDPI may also have potential for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Novartis has stated that Foradil Certihaler offers certainty of dosing and dose confirmation, and will also contain a dose counter that indicates the number of doses left. SkyePharma is responsible for development of the product in its finished form; this includes the supply of both the powder and the inhalation device as a product to Novartis. The product is manufactured at SkyePharma's Lyon facility in France. SkyePharma is receiving fees, development costs and milestone payments from Novartis. SkyePharma will also receive royalty income on worldwide sales. SkyePharma has granted Novartis an exclusive worldwide licence to market Foradil MDPI.Foradil Certihaler was approved in Switzerland in March 2004. This is the first approval in Europe, and will trigger an undisclosed milestone payment by Novartis to SkyePharma. Submissions for regulatory approval in the asthma indication were filed in the EU (on a country-by-country basis) and the US in December 2002. On 22 October 2003, SkyePharma announced that the US FDA had issued an 'approvable' letter for Foradil Certihaler. Launch of the product is anticipated for 2004. Clinical trials of Foradil MDPI for the treatment of asthma began in October 1999. In December 2000, phase III trials commenced in Europe. SkyePharma stated in April 2001 that phase III trials had commenced recently in the US. SkyePharma estimated in April 2001 that the worldwide sales potential of Foradil MDPI could be as much as 600 million US dollars. SkyePharma anticipates receiving royalties and manufacturing revenues of more than 10%.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Formoterol fumarate, a new beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist. Acute studies of selectivity and duration of effect after inhaled and oral administration.

Four double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, crossover studies were performed in nine asthmatic patients to evaluate beta 2-adrenoceptor selectivity and the duration of effect of formoterol. One study with cumulatively increasing doses of formoterol and salbutamol showed that with the inhaled route, formoterol was 5-15 times more potent than salbutamol with respect to bronchodilation. In a second study, 6 micrograms formoterol and 0.1 mg salbutamol were given for comparison of effect duration. Five hours after salbutamol inhalation the FEV1 values were back to basal. Eight hours after formoterol inhalation about 75% of the maximum bronchodilation remained and the FEV1 was significantly higher than after salbutamol inhalation. By oral route, a study with cumulatively increasing doses showed that as a bronchodilator formoterol was about 50 times more potent than salbutamol. The same potency difference was seen for increase of heart rate and decrease of diastolic blood pressure, indicating that the clinical selectivity for beta 2-adrenoceptors is equal for the two drugs. In a fourth study comparable doses by oral route did not show any difference in the duration of bronchodilation. We conclude that inhaled formoterol is 5-15 times more potent than salbutamol. Inhaled formoterol produces longer duration of bronchodilation, with clinically relevant bronchodilation for at least 8 h. The prolonged duration of formoterol was not seen with oral treatment.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of formoterol in healthy volunteers after a single high dose of Foradil dry powder inhalation via Aerolizer.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics of the long-acting beta2-agonist formoterol fumarate, which is a racemate of the (S,S)- and (R,R)-enantiomers were evaluated in 12 healthy (eight male, four female) volunteers after a single inhaled high dose of 120 microg of formoterol fumarate. The tolerability and safety were also assessed. METHODS: Each volunteer inhaled the single 120-microg dose through the Aerolizer device within 2-5 min, using ten 12-microg dry powder capsules for inhalation. Formoterol, i.e., the sum of both enantiomers, was determined in plasma over 24 h, whereas the separate enantiomers were determined in urine over 48 h. Incidence, seriousness and severity of adverse experiences, electrocardiogram (ECG), including the corrected QT interval (QTc) calculation, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and plasma potassium levels were recorded. RESULTS: In nine of the 12 volunteers, the peak plasma concentration of formoterol was observed already at 5 min after inhalation. The absorption kinetics were complex, as depicted by multiple peaks or shoulders within 0.5-6 h after inhalation. Mean with (SD; n = 12) of maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) of formoterol in plasma were 266 (108) pmol x l(-1) and 1330 (398) pmol x l(-1), respectively. The moderate inter-individual variability in systemic exposure of formoterol reflects the homogeneous pharmacokinetics of the drug. A predominant slow elimination of formoterol from plasma with a mean half-life (t1/2) of 10 h was demonstrated. Assuming linear kinetics in plasma suggested by urinary data, the steady-state trough plasma levels of formoterol for a b.i.d. dosing regimen are predicted to amount to 20% of Cmax. In urine, mean with (SD; n = 10) of the amount excreted over 48 h was 3.61 (0.89)% of dose for the pharmacologically active (R,R)-enantiomer and 4.80 (1.33)% of dose for the (S,S)-enantiomer. The terminal half-lives calculated from the excretion rate-time curves, i.e., 13.9 h and 12.3 h for the (R,R)- and (S,S)-enantiomer, respectively, confirm the slow elimination of formoterol from plasma. The dose inhaled was 10 times the most frequently recommended dose (12 microg) and 5 times the highest recommended dose (24 microg). Ten of 12 subjects experienced mild and transient nervousness. Pulse readings demonstrated the maximum mean increase of 25.8 beats x min(-1) at 6 h. The mean maximum QTc increase was 25 msec at 6 h. Pulse and QTc values returned to baseline or close to baseline values at 24 h or before. Potassium levels in plasma decreased in eight out of 12 subjects; the lowest mean value was 3.53 mmol x l(-1) at 2 h post-dose. The lowest individual potassium measurement was 2.95 mmol x l(-1) between 15 min and 6 h. By 8 h post-dose all values had returned to within the normal ranges. CONCLUSIONS: The extremely fast appearance of formoterol in plasma shows the predominance of airways absorption shortly after inhalation. Due to a terminal elimination half-life of about 10 h, sustained systemic concentrations of formoterol are predicted for a twice daily treatment regimen without noteworthy accumulation. The excreted amounts in percent of dose of the enantiomers in urine and the enantiomer ratio are similar to data reported previously after lower doses and suggest linear kinetics for doses between 12 microg and 120 microg of formoterol fumarate. The expected side effects on heart rate, QTc interval, and plasma potassium were small and had no clinical consequences in spite of the very high dose of 120 microg (5 to 10 times the recommended therapeutic dose of Foradil). It should be noted that the impact of high doses may be greater in patients. Nevertheless these findings provide reassurance on the safety margin of formoterol after accidental and intentional overdosing.

Administration, Inhalation↗