Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Foreign Medical Graduates”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

U. S. medical graduates versus foreign medical graduates. Are there performance differences in practice?

This study has attempted to determine the relationship between physicians' medical education and their performances (technical quality and utilization of medical care resources) in offices and hospitals. The sample consisted of 506 physicians of Hawaii, involving 18 specialty categories. The study finds little evidence of the influence of the type of medical schools on physicians' technical quality and utilization of medical resources in practice. The mean differences between the categories of medical schools were not statistically significant (except for the quality when specialists practiced within their own areas of specialization). There is no evidence that all categories of U.S. medical graduates provided a higher quality care and better utilization than all categories of foreign medical graduates. There was no consistent pattern of performances within the categories of U.S. medical schools and of foreign medical schools in these dimensions of performances.

Clinical Competence↗

ECFMG assessment of clinical competence of graduates of foreign medical schools. Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates.

OBJECTIVE: To develop an assessment of clinical competence of graduates of foreign medical schools and to determine the reliability and validity of the assessment and the feasibility of large-scale administration. DESIGN: The Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) clinical competence study included (1) clinical encounters with standardized patients to assess history taking, physical examination, and communication skills; (2) laser videodisk pictorials to assess identification and interpretation of diagnostic procedures; (3) written clinical vignettes to assess diagnosis and management skills; and (4) assessment of spoken English. A uniform method of operating the test centers and of training the standardized patients was developed. SETTING: Medical schools and their primary teaching hospitals and affiliated hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred twenty-four first-year residents, of whom 525 are graduates of foreign medical schools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores, reliability coefficients, validity measures, feasibility of multisite administration, trends of scores over time, and acceptability by examinees. RESULTS: The ECFMG clinical competence assessment was conducted at four geographically separate test centers. Reliability coefficients were high (.85) for the integrated clinical encounter and were in a reasonable range (.71 to .82) for all test components. The assessment adds to the predictability of the residents' performance in the hospital over that of current ECFMG certification examinations. Test security was addressed by demonstrating no consistent pattern of change in scores over testing dates. Virtually all examinees thought the assessment was appropriate. Standardized patients were able to assess spoken English accurately. CONCLUSION: The feasibility of conducting a reliable and valid test of clinical competence for graduates of foreign medical schools was demonstrated for this test population.

Clinical Competence↗

Graduates of foreign medical schools: progression to certification by the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates.

The application process leading to certification by the Education Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) was studied using the group of 9,491 graduates of foreign medical schools who initiated their applications in 1988. Using the ECFMG's database, these applicants' countries of citizenship, examination histories, certification status, and exchange visitor status were determined for a period of seven years and 9 months, ending in September 1995. Within that time, 45% of these applicants became ECFMG-certified, and 26% of that group entered residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Of the total number of non-U.S. citizens (2,243) who entered such programs, 61% did so as exchange visitor physicians. The remainder had other kinds of visa status, such as permanent resident, or had become U.S. citizens. Although U.S. citizens and non-U.S. citizens achieved certification at the same rate (45%), the U.S. citizens had greater success in obtaining positions in graduate medical education (GME). Seventy-four percent of the ECFMG-certified certified U.S. citizens entered GME, versus 57% of the ECFMG-certified non-U.S. citizens. The status of the 55% of the 9,491 applicants who did not obtain certification is discussed; a portion of this group of this group continues to pursue certification. Details and requirements of the ECFMG certification process are also described.

Certification↗

Pilot study of the use of the ECFMG clinical competence assessment to provide profiles of clinical competencies of graduates of foreign medical schools for residency directors. Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates.

PURPOSE: To conduct the first of a series of pilot projects of the clinical competence assessment (CCA) of the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) in order to provide profiles of clinical competencies of graduates of foreign medical schools for residency directors in the United States and for governments and institutions in other countries. METHOD AND RESULTS: In September 1992 the first pilot project of the ECFMG CCA was conducted for a program director who wanted to evaluate ten first-year residents in a midwestern U.S. program. The CCA consists of integrated clinical encounters with ten standardized patients, 60 laser videodisc pictorials, and analysis of test items of previously completed ECFMG certification examinations. Profiles of the following clinical competencies were provided to the program director: data gathering (history and physical examination), interviewing and interpersonal skills, diagnosis and management skills, interpretation of diagnostic and laboratory procedures, written communication of information to the health care team, and spoken-English proficiency. The profiles were provided as individual scores compared with mean scores of a reference group of 525 first-year residents who took the CCA at four U.S. assessment centers, and as percentile scores with a range of one standard error of measurement. CONCLUSION: The individual performance data in this first pilot project were valuable to the program director, who used them to supplement scores on a written examination during the first residency year. The pilot project has shown the ECFMG CCA to be a useful tool for program directors to evaluate applicants and residents who are graduates of foreign medical schools.

Clinical Competence↗

United States foreign medical graduates in Connecticut: how they compare with foreign medical graduates.

This study contrasts the graduate training and subsequent careers of a cohort of United States-born foreign medical graduates (USFMGs) and foreign medical graduates (FMGs) who were in training positions in Connecticut in 1964 and who were located in 1971. The data suggest that although USFMGs were foreign-educated, they had certain advantages--both cultural and administrative--in hospital training positions which helped them to pursue different career alternatives than FMGs. However, the data further suggest that they retained characteristics of their foreign training which continued to differentiate them from United States medical graduates (USMGs).

Age Factors↗

Activities of the states regarding graduates of foreign medical schools. IV. Florida Board of Medical Examiners Foreign Medical Graduate Committee.

This is the fourth of several presentations that were made at a conference on federal, state and private activities regarding graduates of foreign medical schools. Presentations on behalf of the states were made by representatives from the medical licensing boards of Florida. Illinois, New Jersey and New York, as well as the Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States. Articles adapted from these presentations were printed in the October and December 1985 and the January 1986 numbers of the BULLETIN. This article by Dorothy Faircloth concludes the series on activities of the states in this contest.

Education, Medical↗

The performance of foreign medical graduates on the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) standardized patient examination prototype: a collaborative study of the NBME and the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG).

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to explore foreign medical graduates' (FMGs) performance on a clinical skills (SPX) examination. The National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) is in the process of developing an SPX for potential use in the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE). The Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) is developing the Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) as an additional requirement for FMGs who wish to be certified by ECFMG. DESIGN: Thirty-three FMGs and 151 United States medical students (USMSs) took the SPX during the winter of 1996 as part of the ongoing pilot studies conducted by the NBME. Four clinical skill areas were assessed: history-taking, physical examination, communication and interpersonal skills. The examination used in this research consisted of 12 cases. The examination utilizes standardized patients (SPs) who are trained to document examinee behaviours and evaluate the communication component of the test. The SPs were also trained to evaluate the English proficiency of the candidates. Candidates were also administered the Test of Spoken English developed by the Educational Testing Services (ETS). SETTING: The examination was conducted in one medical school which served as an SPX centre for NBME pilot studies. SUBJECTS: Thirty-three foreign medical students and 151 US medical students. RESULTS: The indications were that the majority of candidates in both groups felt the examination was moderately fair but 78% of FMGs felt moderately pressed for time, vs. 80% of the USMSs who did not feel pressed for time. Reliabilities obtained for the various SPX components were somewhat higher for the FMGs reflecting the heterogeneity of this group. CONCLUSIONS: The NBME-ECFMG collaborative study yielded important information regarding the NBME SPX prototype as a performance measure for FMGs.

Clinical Competence↗

A comparison of the characteristics and examination performances of U.S. and non-U.S. citizen international medical graduates who sought Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates certification: 1995-2004.

BACKGROUND: International medical graduates (IMGs) make up a substantial part of the U.S. physician workforce. Unfortunately, little is known about the demographic and performance characteristics of these doctors, especially over time. METHOD: Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) applicants from 1995-2004 were studied. The characteristics and examination performances of U.S. citizen and non-U.S. citizen IMGs were contrasted. RESULTS: ECFMG applications from U.S. citizen IMGs have been increasing. Compared to non-U.S. citizen IMGs, these individuals perform less well on some of the certification examinations, especially in the last 5 years, but are more likely to eventually achieve certification. Based on those medical students/graduates who took the examinations, the performance of U.S. citizen IMGs varied considerably from one medical school to another. CONCLUSION: The composition of the pool of ECFMG-certified IMGs available for graduate medical education has changed over the past 10 years. Shifts in the characteristics and abilities of IMGs are likely to have some future impact on health care delivery in the United States.

Certification↗