Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “First Amendment”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Does the Hyde Amendment violate religious freedom? Harris v. McRae and the First Amendment.

In Harris v. McRae, the recent case in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment, the Court for the first time was asked to consider whether antiabortion legislation respects the establishment of religion or violates the free exercise thereof. The Court held that the Amendment did not effect an establishment of religion, and found that the plaintiffs lacked standing to raise the free exercise argument. The writer explores the questions raised, agreeing with the Court's disposal of the establishment argument. He does find considerable validity in the free exercise challenge, but concludes that the Court as presently constituted is unlikely to accept it. In addition, he believes that the Court, in its treatment of both arguments, either ignored or improperly distinguished earlier cases that supported the plaintiffs.

Abortion, Legal↗

Caring for the female Jehovah's Witness: balancing medicine, ethics, and the First Amendment.

Blood transfusion has been doctrinally forbidden for Jehovah's Witnesses since 1945. Despite serious theologic consequences for its violation, this proscription may not be observed universally by members of the denomination. When a patient declines a lifesaving transfusion, a conflict is generated between the physician's autonomy-based and beneficence-based obligations to the patient. This conflict is intensified when the patient is a woman who had minor dependent children, either in utero or already born. A spectrum of opinion exists regarding the resolution of this conflict. As one of society's repositories of moral and legal values, the court is the most appropriate forum in which religious, medical, and ethical viewpoints may receive a fair and impartial hearing.

Beneficence↗