Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Fees”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Medicaid fees and the Medicare fee schedule: an update.

This study analyzes changes in Medicaid physician fees from 1990 to 1993. Data were collected on maximum allowable Medicaid fees in 1993 and compared with similar 1990 Medicaid data as well as the fully phased-in Medicare Fee Schedule (MFS). The results suggest that, on average, Medicaid fees have grown roughly 14 percent, but considerable variation continues to exist in how well Medicaid programs pay across types of services, States, and census divisions. Medicaid fees remain considerably lower (27 percent for the average Medicaid enrollee) than fees under a fully phased-in MFS. Medicaid fees for primary-care services were, on average, 32 percent lower.

Fee Schedules↗

Effect of cariogenic food exposure on prevalence of dental caries among fee and non-fee paying Nigerian schoolchildren.

Dental caries status, frequency of sweet consumption and method of toothcleaning of 180 Nigerian elementary schoolchildren aged 8-15 yr were investigated by clinical examination and questionnaire technique. The highest frequency of sweet consumption was recorded for the fee-paying pupils, who also had statistically significantly higher caries prevalence than in non-fee paying schools (P less than 0.001). About 48% and 24% of the fee and non-fee paying pupils respectively had dental caries. There was no significant difference in the sex distribution of the disease (P greater than 0.05). However, there was a significant difference (P less than 0.001) between methods of cleaning the teeth in the two types of schools. The majority (95%) of the fee-paying pupils used only a toothbrush while 51% of the non-fee paying pupils used a chewing stick. Methods for restricting the use of sweet snacks in addition to oral hygiene instruction are discussed as important means to reduce the increasing caries prevalence in schoolchildren in developing countries.

Adolescent↗

Medicare physician fees overhauled. The RBRVS fee system and its implications for hospitals.

Medicare has begun to implement a new payment system for physician services; the system's cornerstone is a resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS) that divides physician services into three components--physician work, practice expense, and malpractice insurance--and calculates a relative value for each component. The relative values for the components are adjusted for geographic differences between regional and national resource costs. Then a conversion factor transforms a relative value into a payment amount. The full RBRVS fee will be paid beginning January 1, 1992, if the fee does not differ by more than 15 percent from the service's adjusted historical payment basis. If the difference generally exceeds 15 percent, the RBRVS fee will be phased in over four years. The Medicare RBRVS fee schedule applies to both office- and hospital-based physicians. Several special provisions apply to physicians ordinarily defined as hospital based--radiologists, anesthesiologists, and pathologists. Other provisions of the fee schedule address site-of-service differentials, electrocardiograms, nonphysician practitioners, new physicians or practitioners, and Health Professional Shortage Areas. Administrators need timely strategies to manage successfully in the new environment and to sidestep lost or delayed reimbursement. RBRVS has financial and operational implications in terms of physician compensation, outpatient hospital reimbursement, new CPT codes, and new outpatient billing procedures.

Allied Health Personnel↗

Charging for hospital pharmaceutical services: product cost, per diem fees and fees for special clinical services.

A method of charging for pharmaceutical services is described which includes the cost of drug products, dispensing fees for intravenous drug admixtures, per diem fees for basic dispensing and clinical services (according to patient type), and fees for special clinical services. The basic per diem charge covers drug purchasing and inventory control, department management, drug information services, dose preparation, drug order interpretation, drug therapy monitoring, and the availability of pharmacists to answer the questions of nurses and physicians. The clinical services for which special fees are charged are: hemogram drug report, drug liver function report, aminoglycoside dosing guidelines, heparin i.v. infusion, oral anticoagulation, patient drug history, operant conditioning, parenteral nutrition guidelines, and pharmacokinetic drug level interpretations and consultations. The reasons for changing to the system, the services provided and experiences with the system are discussed. Implementation of the system is discussed in relation to the calculation of fees; comparisons with alternate charging methods; approval of special clinical service charges; computer billing; information about pharmacy charges for patients; and third-party payers.

California↗

MMPL-differences between fee-paying and non-fee-paying psychotherapy clients.

Compared the MMPI profiles of 23 randomly selected fee-paying clients (FP group) of an out-patient psychiatry clinic to those of 23 clients who left unpaid bills (NFP group). All Ss had been terminated at least 2 months. No differences between groups were found on age, education, income, fee level, number of therapy sessions, sex, or marital status. The NFP group scored significantly higher on the F, Paranoia, and Schizophrenia scales. Additionally, the NFP group endorsed significantly more critical items and generated a greater number of mean scale scores over 70. These results suggest a relationship between degree of psychopathology and non-fee-payment.

Adult↗

Involving clinicians in fee collections: implications for improving clinical practice and increasing fee income in a community mental health center.

This paper examines the relationship between a client's payment or non-payment of fees and treatment outcome, diagnosis, and training of the therapist. Clients who pay regularly are more satisfied and have higher goal attainment regardless of diagnosis. A statistical study and clinical case examples are presented which demonstrate that the failure to pay is clinically significant information and that involving clinicians in the fee collection process can improve clinical treatment and increase the agency's fee income.

Accounting↗

Splitting fees or splitting hairs? Fee splitting and health care--the Florida experience.

Attorneys Jacobs and Goodman review the prohibitions against fee-splitting under Florida law and argue that Florida and other states need a clear statutory definition of prohibited activities. In addition, the authors argue that the Florida Board of Medicine has applied the prohibition against fee-splitting arbitrarily and in contrast to legal precedent set by the Second District Court of Appeals. Finally, the authors suggest that Minnesota provides clear legislative guidance on the issue of fee-splitting and that the approach adopted by Minnesota is more practical in today's complex health care reimbursement environment.

American Dental Association↗

Revision of fee schedules; 100% fee recovery; clarification of size standards--Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Final rule.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending its regulations concerning the payment of annual fees to clarify the provisions that identify the size standards used to determine whether an NRC licensee would qualify as a "small entity" under the Regulatory Flexibility Act for the purpose of paying a reduced annual fee. This clarification is necessary because the size standards presented in the regulations did not clearly indicate the complete range of size standards adopted by the NRC.

Fees and Charges↗

Medicare program; revisions to payment policies under the physician fee schedule, other Part B payment policies, and establishment of the clinical psychologist fee schedule for calendar year 1998; correction--HCFA. Correction of proposed rule.

This document corrects technical errors that appeared in the proposed rule published in the Federal Register on June 18, 1997 entitled "Medicare Program; Revisions to Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule, Other Part B Payment Policies, and Establishment of the Clinical Psychologist Fee Schedule for Calendar Year 1998."

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗

Medicare program; revisions to payment policies and adjustments to the relative value units under the physician fee schedule, other Part B payment policies, and establishment of the clinical psychologist fee schedule for calendar year 1998; correction--HCFA. Correction of final rule with comment period.

This document corrects technical errors that appeared in the final rule with comment period published in the Federal Register on October 31, 1997 entitled "Medicare Program; Revisions to Payment Policies and Adjustments to the Relative Value Units Under the Physician Fee Schedule, Other Part B Payment Policies, and Establishment of the Clinical Psychologist Fee Schedule for Calendar Year 1998.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗

Dubin calls on CMPA to eliminate fee differentials, adopt flat fee for all physicians.

Charles Dubin's massive review of the Canadian Medical Protective Association supports the CMPA's policy of maintaining a large reserve for malpractice coverage, but calls for a major overhaul of the association's fee structure. Regardless of the risks their practices pose, says Dubin, all doctors should pay the same fee in order to keep physicians practising in high-risk specialties such as obstetrics and orthopedic surgery. The alternative, said CMPA president Dr. Bill Thomas, is an exodus from certain specialties because of massive bills for malpractice insurance.

Canada↗

Searching fee and non-fee toxicology information resources: an overview of selected databases.

Toxicology profiles organize information by broad subjects, the first of which affirms identity of the agent studied. Studies here show two non-fee databases (ChemFinder and ChemIDplus) verify the identity of compounds with high efficiency (63% and 73% respectively) with the fee-based Chemical Abstracts Registry file serving well to fill data gaps (100%). Continued searching proceeds using knowledge of structure, scope and content to select databases. Valuable sources for information are factual databases that collect data and facts in special subject areas organized in formats available for analysis or use. Some sources representative of factual files are RTECS, CCRIS, HSDB, GENE-TOX and IRIS. Numerous factual databases offer a wealth of reliable information; however, exhaustive searches probe information published in journal articles and/or technical reports with records residing in bibliographic databases such as BIOSIS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, TOXLINE and Web of Science. Listed with descriptions are numerous factual and bibliographic databases supplied by 11 producers. Given the multitude of options and resources, it is often necessary to seek service desk assistance. Questions were posed by telephone and e-mail to service desks at DIALOG, ISI, MEDLARS, Micromedex and STN International. Results of the survey are reported.

Bibliographies as Topic↗

Revision of fee schedules; 100% fee recovery, FY 1992--NRC. Final rule.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending the licensing, inspection, and annual fees charged to its applicants and licensees. The amendments are necessary to implement Public Law 101-508, signed into law on November 5, 1990, which mandates that the NRC recover approximately 100 percent of its budget authority in Fiscal Year (FY) 1992 less amounts appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund (NWF). The amount to be recovered for FY 1992 is approximately $492.5 million.

Fees and Charges↗

Medicare program; revisions to payment policies under the physician fee for schedule, other Part B payment policies, and establishment of the clinical psychologist fee schedule for calendar year 1998--HCFA. Proposed rule.

This proposed rule discusses several policy changes affecting Medicare Part B payment. The changes related to physician services, including resource-based practice expense relative value units and geographic practice cost index changes, clinical psychologist services, supervision of diagnostic tests, the methodology used to develop reasonable compensation equivalent limits, payment to participating and nonparticipating suppliers, global surgical services, caloric vestibular testing, clinical consultations, and payments based on actual charges. Under the law, we are required to develop a resource-based system for determining practice expense relative value units effective January 1, 1998. In addition, since we established the physician fee schedule on January 1, 1992, our experience indicates that some of our Part B payment policies need to be reconsidered. This proposed rule is intended to correct inequities in physician payment and solicits public comments on specific proposed policy changes.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗