Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “FGFR3::TACC3”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2025

Diffusely metastatic glioblastoma with FGFR3::TACC3 fusion: cell-free DNA fragmentation analyses and molecular characterization of matched primary and metastatic tumor sites.

Extracranial metastasis of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma is very rare and poorly understood at the molecular level. We report a case of FGFR3::TACC3 fusion IDH-wildtype glioblastoma in a 61-year-old male, whose preoperative blood sample showed highly aberrant cfDNA fragmentation patterns, which could be suggestive of early systemic dissemination, undetected by standard-of-care imaging of his body. Eleven months post-resection and adjuvant therapy, he developed widespread extracranial metastases. Comprehensive molecular profiling of matched primary and metastatic tumors revealed broadly conserved genomic, transcriptomic, and copy number landscapes, with the metastasis harboring an additional ERCC6 deletion and enriched expression of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling genes. These findings provide rare insight into the genetic continuity and evolution underlying IDH-wildtype glioblastoma metastasis.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

Correlation of TACC3, FGFR3, MMSET and p21 expression with the t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) in multiple myeloma.

The t(4;14)(p16;q32) translocation seen in c. 18% of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) cases, results in FGFR3 activation and creation of an IGH/MMSET fusion transcript. We have recently shown that FGFR3 is activated in only 75% of t(4;14)(+) cases, suggesting that alternative genes near the breakpoint may be involved in the transforming event. The gene, TACC3, located just 50 kb telomeric of FGFR3, with transforming capacity, therefore represented a candidate gene. Using a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approach on a cohort of 54 patients, we found a statistically significant, twofold increase in TACC3 expression in t(4;14)(+) cases. TACC3, MMSET and p21 values were positively correlated in all cases and, of particular interest, six patient samples [three t(4;14)(-), three t(4;14)(+)] samples showed a joint up-regulation of TACC3, MMSET and p21. Although a poor prognosis is linked with elevated MMSET expression, an extended follow-up period will be required to evaluate the significance of elevated TACC3 and p21 expression in this subgroup of MM.

Adult↗
PubMed2026

Comprehensive characterization of MET exon 14 skipping mutations in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METΔex14) is a key driver event in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and can emerge as an acquired drug resistance mechanism to MET, EGFR or ALK inhibitors. The clinical and genomic features of METΔex14 in NSCLC require further characterization. METHODS: Our study included a total of 585 patients with METΔex14 + NSCLC, comprising 556 baseline samples, 53 samples from patients exhibiting resistance to MET inhibitors, and 16 samples from patients resistant to EGFR/ALK inhibitors. Genomic data from targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tissue and/or plasma samples using GeneseeqPrime™ (a 425 pan-cancer gene panel) were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, METΔex14 exhibited a prevalence of 1.02% (n = 585) in the screened NSCLC population, with a higher incidence in patients with a sarcomatoid histology. METΔex14 was predominantly detected at the splice donor site, though the non-coding region adjacent to the splice acceptor site contributed considerably to the complexity of METΔex14. Common concurrent alterations identified at baseline included those in TP53 (40.8%), CDK4 (16%) and EGFR (12.4%). Concurrent MET amplification and cell cycle pathway mutations were both associated with worse outcomes in patients treated with crizotinib, with significant co-occurrences observed also among these concurrent genomic variations. In addition, increased chromosomal instability and intra-tumoral heterogeneity correlated with a poorer response to crizotinib. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to MET inhibitors were primarily attributed to on-target MET D1228X/Y1230X mutations or off-target alterations within genes in the RTK/RAS/MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways. Intriguingly, our exploratory analysis also identified the FGFR3::TACC3 fusion as a potential resistance mechanism to savolitinib. Moreover, METΔex14 was identified in 16 patients following progression on EGFR and ALK inhibitors, highlighting the need for developing tailored therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive characterization of METΔex14 in NSCLC, revealing its dual role as a primary driver of oncogenesis and a potential resistance mechanism to EGFR/ALK inhibitors. The identification of concurrent genetic alterations and potential resistance mechanisms enhances our molecular understanding of treatment responses. These findings highlight the need for further investigation into targeted therapies that consider the genomic complexity of METΔex14 to improve treatment efficacy and patient outcomes.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

C-Terminal Truncation and Fusion Partner Determine Oncogenicity of FGFR3.

UNLABELLED: Genomic alterations affecting components of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling axis can trigger aberrant pathway activation and tumor development. Genomic truncation of the FGF receptor 2 (FGFR2) exon 18 (E18) disrupts the FGFR2 carboxy (C)-terminal tail, acting as a potent driver alteration across multiple tumor types. In this study, we analyzed human oncogenomic datasets to reveal that E18 truncations are similarly prevalent in FGFR3, an FGFR2 paralog. FGFR3 E18 truncations primarily occur due to rearrangements (RE) that involve transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 3 (TACC3), resulting in FGFR3ΔE18-TACC3 gene fusions. In contrast to E18-truncated FGFR2, functional in vitro and in vivo examination of Fgfr3 variants demonstrated that the truncation of Fgfr3 E18 is insufficient to promote oncogenic activity in cell lines or in the lungs and mammary glands of mice. Only the combination of an Fgfr3 E18 truncation with a RE partner gene that encodes a receptor-dimerizing domain resulted in the development of tumors, which were sensitive to FGFR inhibition. Overall, these findings suggest that patients with cancers that are positive for rearranged FGFR3, resulting in E18 truncation and a fusion to dimerizing partners, should be considered for FGFR-targeted therapies. SIGNIFICANCE: FGFR3, unlike its paralog FGFR2, requires both a C-terminal truncation and fusion to a partner gene that retains the expression of a dimerizing domain to effectively drive oncogenic signaling and tumorigenesis.

Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3↗
PubMed1999

The third member of the transforming acidic coiled coil-containing gene family, TACC3, maps in 4p16, close to translocation breakpoints in multiple myeloma, and is upregulated in various cancer cell lines.

We have recently identified a novel gene, TACC1 (transforming acidic coiled coil-containing gene 1), which is located close to FGFR1 within a region amplified in breast cancer on human chromosome 8p11. The coiled coil domain of this gene identified a series of cDNAs in the expressed sequence tag database, which suggested the existence of a family of TACC genes comprising at least three family members. We have now characterized the human and mouse TACC3 cDNAs, and demonstrate that this gene is upregulated in various cancer cell lines, and at Embryonic Day 15 in mice, suggesting that the TACC3 protein is involved in the control of cell growth and differentiation. The TACC3 gene maps telomeric to the FGFR3 gene in 4p16.3, close to a region disrupted by translocation breakpoints associated with multiple myeloma. Thus, TACC1, TACC2, and TACC3 map close to the corresponding FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 genes. The phylogenetic relationship among the three TACC genes is similar to that of the three FGFR family members. These relationships suggest that the FGFR and TACC genes arose from a physically linked ancestral gene pair. Subsequently, this gene pair has undergone two successive rounds of gene duplication to give rise to the three FGFR/TACC gene pairs on chromosomes 4, 8, and 10.

Animals↗