Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Attitudes of Dutch general practitioners and nursing home physicians to active voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.

OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the attitudes of Dutch general practitioners and nursing home physicians to voluntary active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. DESIGN: Descriptive study. METHOD: Data were collected by means of anonymous postal questionnaires to be completed by a random sample of 521 general practitioners from the province of North Holland, 521 general practitioners from the rest of the Netherlands, and 713 Dutch nursing home physicians who were members of the Dutch Association of Nursing Home Physicians. RESULTS: The written responses of general practitioners and nursing home physicians to six statements about voluntary active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide showed that a large majority had a fairly positive attitude to euthanasia and suicide. This finding also emerged from the scores obtained on a scale compiled on the basis of the statements. General practitioners and nursing home physicians were more opposed to euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide if they had never performed it, if they belonged to a religious group, or if they were older. CONCLUSION: Dutch general practitioners and nursing home physicians have a fairly positive attitude toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. However, the majority of these physicians favor a policy of voluntary active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide under strict conditions.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1996

The legislation of active voluntary euthanasia in Australia: will the slippery slope prove fatal?

At 2.00 am on the morning of May 24, 1995 the Northern Territory Legislative Assembly Australia passed the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act by the narrow margin of 15 votes to 10. The act permits a terminally ill patient of sound mind and over the age of 18 years, and who is either in pain or suffering, or distress, to request a medical practitioner to assist the patient to terminate his or her life. Thus, Australia can lay claim to being the first country in the world to legalise voluntary active euthanasia. The Northern Territory's act has prompted Australia-wide community reaction, particularly in South Australia, Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory where proposals to legalise euthanasia have already been defeated on the floor of parliament. In New South Wales (NSW) the AIDS Council of NSW has prepared draft euthanasia legislation to be introduced into the Upper House as a Private Member's Bill some time in 1996. In this paper, we focus on a brief description of events as they occurred and on the arguments for and against the legalisation of euthanasia which have appeared in the media.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Suicide and voluntary active euthanasia: why the difference in attitude?

It appears that the attitudes of health professionals differ towards suicide and voluntary active euthanasia. An acceptance of, if not an agreement with, voluntary active euthanasia exists, while there is a general consensus that suicide should be prevented. This paper searches for a working definition of suicide, to discover ethical reasons for the negative value that suicide assumes, and also to provide a term of reference when comparing suicide with euthanasia. On arriving at a working definition of suicide, it is compared with voluntary active euthanasia. An analysis of utilitarian and deontological considerations is provided and proves to be inconclusive with respect to the ethical principles informing the attitudes of professionals. Therefore, a search for other influences is attempted; this indicates that psychological influences inform attitudes to a greater degree than ethical principles.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1994

Voluntary active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Dutch nursing homes: requests and administration.

OBJECTIVE: To learn how many requests for voluntary active euthanasia and/or physician-assisted suicide (EAS) are made to Dutch nursing home physicians (NHPs) and how often these requests are honored. DESIGN: Retrospective survey. SETTING: The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: All Dutch NHPs affiliated with the Dutch Association of Nursing Home Physicians (n = 713). MEASUREMENTS: An anonymous postal questionnaire was sent to all Dutch NHPs affiliated with the Dutch Association of Nursing Home Physicians (n = 713). Respondents were asked how often they had received an explicit request for EAS and whether they had complied with that request. Those who had complied were asked questions about the last occasion on which they had administered either voluntary active euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide. RESULTS: The response rate was 86% (n = 582). Of the respondents, 88% had never administered EAS in nursing homes. The remaining 12% (n = 69) had received 164 requests for voluntary active euthanasia and 53 requests for physician-assisted suicide in the period 1986 through mid-1990. Of these requests, 74 were granted (51 voluntary active euthanasia and 23 physician-assisted suicide). Dutch NHPs together receive an average of 300 requests for EAS a year. They comply with 25 of such requests annually. CONCLUSION: Not many requests for EAS are made in Dutch nursing homes. Of these requests, fewer than 1 in 10 result in the actual administration of EAS. The data presented are relatively constant for the 4.5-year period studied.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Palliative options of last resort: a comparison of voluntarily stopping eating and drinking, terminal sedation, physician-assisted suicide, and voluntary active euthanasia.

Palliative care is generally agreed to be the standard of care for the dying, but there remain some patients for whom intolerable suffering persists. In the face of ethical and legal controversy about the acceptability of physician-assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia, voluntarily stopping eating and drinking and terminal sedation have been proposed as ethically superior responses of last resort that do not require changes in professional standards or the law. The clinical and ethical differences and similarities between these 4 practices are critically compared in light of the doctrine of double effect, the active/passive distinction, patient voluntariness, proportionality between risks and benefits, and the physician's potential conflict of duties. Terminal sedation and voluntarily stopping eating and drinking would allow clinicians to remain responsive to a wide range of patient suffering, but they are ethically and clinically more complex and closer to physician-assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia than is ordinarily acknowledged. Safeguards are presented for any medical action that may hasten death, including determining that palliative care is ineffective, obtaining informed consent, ensuring diagnostic and prognostic clarity, obtaining an independent second opinion, and implementing reporting and monitoring processes. Explicit public policy about which of these practices are permissible would reassure the many patients who fear a bad death in their future and allow for a predictable response for the few whose suffering becomes intolerable in spite of optimal palliative care.

Beneficence↗
PubMed1998

Beneficent voluntary active euthanasia: a challenge to professionals caring for terminally ill patients.

Euthanasia has once again become headline news in the UK, with the announcement by Dr Michael Irwin, a former medical director of the United Nations, that he has helped at least 50 people to die, including two between February and July 1997. He has been quoted as saying that his 'conscience is clear' and that the time has come to confront the issue of euthanasia. For the purposes of this article, the term 'beneficient voluntary active euthanasia' (BVAE) will be used: beneficient from the prima facie principle of beneficience, to do good, and voluntary to indicate that this must be carried out at the request of a competent client. This implies adherence to another prima facie principle, that of respect for autonomy. Active implies that something is done or given with the intention of hastening death. The word euthanasia itself simply means 'good death'. This article examines the moral positions of two nurses and one junior doctor towards the subject of BVAE and an attempt is made to represent the main conflicting moral positions. The central arguments against BVAE and counterarguments are presented. The conclusion reached is that consenting adults should not be prevented from availing themselves of BVAE if another consenting adult (a medical doctor) is available and capable of carrying out their wishes. This being the case, it is suggested that BVAE should be available as an option in hospices and in the community. The aims of this article are: to generate debate among professionals; to present a three-way discussion that might be useful as a focus for educational purposes, particularly at undergraduate level; to challenge professionals to confront the issue of euthanasia; and to plead the case of those who request assistance in exercising autonomy by gaining control over their own deaths.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Voluntary active euthanasia and the doctrine of double effect: a view from Germany.

This paper discusses physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and voluntary active euthanasia (VAE), supplies a short history and argues in favour of permitting both once rigid criteria have been set and the cases retro-reviewed. I suggest that among these criteria should be that VAE should only be permitted with one more necessary criterion: that VAE should only be allowed when physician assisted suicide is not a possible option. If the patient is able to ingest and absorb the medication there is no reason why VAE should be permitted. A brief history of VAE and PAS is given and some of the arguments which have been given are analyzed. The Principle of the Double Effect is briefly discussed and why, in my opinion, it is not a valid principle is briefly discussed.

Ethics, Medical↗
PubMed1996

Voluntary active euthanasia and doctor-assisted suicide: knowledge and attitudes of Dutch medical students.

The objective of the study was to gain insight into the knowledge of and attitudes towards voluntary active euthanasia and doctor-assisted suicide (EEDAS) of Dutch medical students, and to determine whether knowledge and attitudes change after a 1-day informative conference about EDAS. Data were collected by means of two self-administered questionnaires. Questionnaire 1 had to be completed before the start of the conference and questionnaire 2 after the conference. In both questionnaires, students were asked by means of two open-ended questions to define euthanasia and doctor-assisted suicide. They were also asked to indicate which of eight statements met with the requirements for prudent practice. Finally, the students were asked to what extent they agreed or disagreed with each of seven statements about attitudes towards EDAS. To determine if a selection occurred among students who returned both questionnaires, their background characteristics, and knowledge and attitudes towards EDAS were compared with those who returned only the first questionnaire. Forty-seven students returned only the first questionnaire, while both questionnaires were returned by 137 students. No differences were found between students who returned both questionnaires and those who returned only the first questionnaire with regard to age, religion, knowledge of and attitudes towards EDAS. Students' knowledge of the definitions of EDAS and the requirements for prudent practice improved significantly. Students' reactions to the statements on attitudes towards EDAS showed that a large majority had a fairly positive attitude towards EDAS. There was no significant difference before and after the conference. Male students and students with a religion were more opposed to EDAS than female students and students without a religion. The fact that the students' knowledge of EDAS improved after a 1-day conference does not imply sufficient understanding of the issue. Because EDAS is allowed only under strict conditions in the Netherlands, medical students require special training. Only then will they be equipped to deal with requests for EDAS during their future careers.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Voluntary active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Dutch nursing homes: are the requirements for prudent practice properly met?

OBJECTIVE: To acquire data about and an understanding of the way in which Dutch nursing home physicians (NHPs) who administer voluntary active euthanasia and/or physician-assisted suicide (EAS) cope with the requirements for prudent practice. These requirements include: the patient must experience his or her suffering as unbearable and hopeless; the wish to die must be well considered and persistent; the request must be voluntary; the NHP must consult at least one other physician; the physician is not allowed to issue a certificate testifying to natural death and is obliged to keep records. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, MEASUREMENTS: See preceding paper. RESULTS: Sixty-nine NHPs (12%) indicated that they had administered EAS on at least one occasion. The state of the patient was described by the NHP as utterly hopeless in 88% of cases and as utterly unbearable in 64% of the cases. The period of time between the first discussion of the subject and the actual administration varied from less than a day to more than a year. The most frequently given reasons for the request were unbearable suffering (53%) and hopeless suffering (49%). The majority of the NHPs (85%) indicated that it was the patient who first broached the subject of EAS. Eighty-five percent of the NHPs also requested a consultation with another physician. In the majority of cases this second opinion was given by another NHP (63%); over 50% of these NHPs worked in the same nursing home. Ninety-one percent of the physicians consulted were convinced that the request was well considered, and 93% found that there was no alternative treatment available. The nurses involved were consulted informally: 94% were questioned about the request for EAS and 93% about the physician's intention to comply. Seventy-five percent of the respondents said they had made some sort of written notes regarding the last time they had administered EAS. The number of certificates testifying to death by natural causes fell after 1988. In 41% of the cases all requirements were met. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that Dutch NHPs observe all the requirements for EAS in 41% of cases. In the remaining cases, shortcomings were found: NHPs allowed too little time between the first discussion and the actual administration; they did not always keep written records; or they signed a death certificate testifying that the patient had died a natural death.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Voluntary active euthanasia and the nurse: a comparison of Japanese and Australian nurses.

Although euthanasia has been a pressing ethical and public issue, empirical data are lacking in Japan. We aimed to explore Japanese nurses' attitudes to patients' requests for euthanasia and to estimate the proportion of nurses who have taken active steps to hasten death. A postal survey was conducted between October and December 1999 among all nurse members of the Japanese Association of Palliative Medicine, using a self-administered questionnaire based on the one used in a previous survey with Australian nurses in 1991. The response rate was 68%. A total of 53% of the respondents had been asked by patients to hasten their death, but none had taken active steps to bring about death. Only 23% regarded voluntary active euthanasia as something ethically right and 14% would practice it if it were legal. A comparison with empirical data from the previous Australian study suggests a significantly more conservative attitude among Japanese nurses.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Bioethics and political ideology: the case of active voluntary euthanasia.

In different countries responses to important bioethical issues are different, as exemplified by the attitudes towards the voluntary and active forms of medical euthanasia. But why is this the case? My suggestion is that the roots of the variety are, to be considerable degree, ideological. The most important present-day political ideologies all have their roots in the prevailing doctrines of moral and social philosophy. In the paper these doctrines are outlined and the predicted response towards active voluntary euthanasia within each model is sketched. The conclusion reached is that while it would in some countries be dangerous to allow euthanasia in the prevailing circumstances, the solution is not to hinder the legalization process but to alter the circumstances.

Attitude↗