Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “European reference networks”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Genetic testing practices across European epilepsy centers: An ERN EpiCARE survey.

OBJECTIVE: Genetic testing plays an increasing role in the diagnostic pathway for rare and complex epilepsies. However, significant heterogeneity persists in access, implementation, and interpretation across Europe. This study aimed to assess genetic testing practices, accessibility, and challenges across expert epilepsy centers within the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies (ERN EpiCARE) and to identify key challenges and areas for harmonization. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was developed by the ERN EpiCARE Clinical Genetics Working Group and distributed to 50 EpiCARE member centers across 27 European countries. The questionnaire collected quantitative and qualitative information on available genetic testing modalities, turnaround times, use of rapid testing, multidisciplinary team (MDT) organization, genetic counseling practices, and perceived challenges. Survey findings were complemented by a structured discussion held during the ERN EpiCARE General Assembly. RESULTS: Responses were received from 46 centers (51 responses). Most centers reported access to genetic testing, predominantly through in-house facilities. Whole-exome sequencing was available in 85% of centers, and gene panels were available in 78%. Whole-genome sequencing was available in 59% of centers, frequently restricted to research or performed externally. Turnaround times for standard genetic testing were most commonly between 1 and 6 months. Genetic testing strategies varied by epilepsy subtype, with gene panels most frequently used as first-tier testing, and exome sequencing preferentially applied in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in MDT organization, access to genetic counseling, reimbursement, data-sharing and registry infrastructures. SIGNIFICANCE: Although genetic testing is widely available across ERN EpiCARE centers, substantial disparities persist in its organization, accessibility, and implementation. Addressing these gaps through strengthened multidisciplinary collaboration, harmonized diagnostic strategies, and enhanced European-level coordination will be essential to ensure equitable access to high-quality genetic care for individuals with epilepsy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Genetic testing is increasingly integrated in the diagnostic pathway for rare and complex epilepsies and treatment decisions. An ERN EpiCARE survey assessed how genetic testing is implemented across specialist epilepsy centers in Europe and identified persistent organizational, financial, and clinical barriers. Although most centers had access to advanced genomic testing, important differences were identified in access, reimbursement, turnaround times, and multidisciplinary expertise. European collaboration and harmonized practices are needed to support equitable access to high-quality genetic care for people living with epilepsy.

European reference networks↗
PubMed2026

Hereditary cancer: Germline testing practices across ERN GENTURIS member countries.

Germline genetic testing practices for hereditary cancer vary across the European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS) member countries. We surveyed experts in genetic testing from 20 EU member countries and Norway to assess multi-gene panel usage, availability of genome-wide sequencing, first-tier testing approaches, implementation of polygenic risk scores, and the roles of non-genetic healthcare professionals. National experts and members of the ERN GENTURIS completed a structured questionnaire covering founder germline pathogenic variants (gPV) testing, panel testing for common genetic tumour risk syndromes, use of whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing, polygenic risk score implementation, use of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour samples, laboratory accreditation, and the clinical roles of physicians, genetic counselors and nurses. Significant inter-country heterogeneity was observed. Most countries rely on next-generation sequencing (NGS) multi-gene panels. Founder gPV testing is first-line in a few high-prevalence populations (e.g., BRCA1/2 founders). All 21 countries offer NGS panel tests for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, and ≥19 countries do so for colorectal and prostate cancers. However, NGS panel size and gene composition exhibit substantial variability. WES is available in 12 countries on a routine basis. Most countries implemented genetic testing on stored tumour tissue from deceased patients. In all countries, clinical geneticists can order germline genetic tests, and in 9 countries, any physician can do so. These findings show differences in accessibility to germline genetic testing of hereditary cancer in Europe. We propose EU-wide guidance via pathways, standards of care, and sharing of best practices to further optimize access to hereditary cancer genetic molecular diagnostics.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

American College of Rheumatology Guidance Statement for Diagnosis and Management of VEXAS Developed by the International VEXAS Working Group Expert Panel.

OBJECTIVE: Vacuoles E1 enzyme X-linked autoinflammatory somatic syndrome (VEXAS) is a recently identified rare genetic disorder associated with somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene. VEXAS presents with a combination of inflammatory and hematologic manifestations, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Given the variability in disease presentation and the limited number of studies to date, no clinical documents currently exist to provide guidance to health care providers about the management of VEXAS. To address this gap, we formed an international multidisciplinary panel of VEXAS experts. RESULTS: Through formalized meetings and a voting process, the group developed consensus clinical guidance considerations for the management of VEXAS. These considerations offer practical advice on several key topics: (1) clinical features of VEXAS, (2) UBA1 screening methods, (3) the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) in patients with VEXAS, and (4) prognosis and management. The aim is to provide expert guidance on which patients to test, how to test for VEXAS, how to approach MDS in the context of VEXAS, and considerations for management. CONCLUSION: This work marks the first formal international consensus guidance for VEXAS and is intended to be used as a resource for clinicians seeking to understand the disease and its management.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Genetic testing and reporting: What the endocrinologists should know and can expect (Joint position paper of the ENDO-ERN).

Over the last decade, next generation sequencing (NGS) has become an essential tool for diagnostic DNA testing in human genetics. To improve the understanding of available genetic testing strategies and to facilitate the request of genetic testing in daily endocrine practice, clinical and laboratory experts in the field have summarized the major issues which should be known and considered. In this joint position paper of the ENDO-ERN, the roles and responsibilities of the health care professionals involved in the diagnostic workflow are described, and the major issues concerning genetic testing workflows are overviewed. These issues encompass all relevant steps, including test request and pre-analytical procedures, laboratory and data processing workflows, quality assurance, and reporting. As NGS procedures result in an increasing number of variants of unknown significance and incidental findings, these aspects are addressed as well. Accompanied by illustrations of the genetic diagnostic workflow and of concise reports for a fast orientation about the major aspects of genetic testing, this joint paper should support the health care professionals during a request for genetic testing.

VUS↗
PubMed2026

Development of a PCR-based technique for genotyping UGT1A1 gene and distribution of rs3064744 alleles in the Russian population.

BACKGROUND: Accurate determination of tandem thymine-adenine (TA) repeat numbers in the UGT1A1 promoter region (rs3064744) is essential for diagnosing Gilbert's syndrome and personalizing therapy with toxic agents like irinotecan and atazanavir. However, traditional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays face severe limitations due to the AT-rich sequence and overlapping melting temperatures (Tm) of the highly homologous 7TA and 8TA alleles. In this context, melting curve analysis (MCA) employing fluorophore-quencher systems has emerged as a promising alternative. The purpose of this study was to develop a novel genotyping approach combining optimized aPCR-MCA analysis with an automated classifier to overcome the limitations posed by the differentiation of highly homologous alleles and to demonstrate its practical application, providing the distribution of rs3064744 genotypes across four regional cohorts of the Russian population. METHODS: A specialized Dual Head 1D-convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) ensemble with Test-Time Augmentation (TTA) was developed. The model was trained and internally validated on 1,620 engineered plasmid samples, and independently evaluated on an external clinical test set of 440 unique patient genomic DNA specimens. Real-time PCR was performed on CFX96 and DTprime platforms. Additionally, population-wide screening was conducted on 997 archival clinical samples from Moscow, Sakha (Yakutia), Dagestan, and Rostov regions. RESULTS: While 5TA and 6TA alleles were easily separated, absolute Tm distributions of 7TA and 8TA alleles overlapped significantly, and non-uniform Tm shifts of 0.8 °C-1.4 °C occurred across platforms. Conventional absolute Tm thresholding was therefore inadequate. By assessing relative morphological curve divergence against co-amplified 7TA/7TA and 7TA/8TA reference anchors, the 1D-CNN ensemble neutralized instrument noise. It achieved 100% accuracy on internal validation and 100% concordance (440/440) with clinical reference pyrosequencing. Population screening revealed that Dagestan, Yakutia, and Rostov cohorts closely align with the European population. Rare 5TA and 8TA alleles were detected at low frequencies in Yakutia and Moscow. CONCLUSION: Combining LNA-modified aPCR-MCA with a comparative 1D-CNN model successfully circumvents thermodynamic limitations and eliminates human operator bias. This integrated system offers an accessible, high-throughput, and clinically valid solution for routine UGT1A1 pharmacogenetic testing.

1D-CNN↗