Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Esomeprazole”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Esomeprazole-based therapy in Helicobacter pylori eradication: any effect by increasing the dose of esomeprazole or prolonging the treatment?

AIM: To study the efficacy of esomeprazole-based triple therapy in Helicobacter pylori eradication and to evaluate, by a randomized trial, the effect of increasing the dose of esomeprazole or prolonging the treatment. METHODS: Four-hundred and fifty duodenal ulcer patients were randomized to receive: (1) esomeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.), and amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.), for 7 days (E20-7d); (2) esomeprazole (40 mg b.i.d.) with the same antibiotics, also for 7 days (E40-7d); and (3) esomeprazole (40 mg b.i.d.) with the same antibiotics, for 10 days (E40-10d). Cure rates were evaluated by (13)C-urea breath test. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty patients received each treatment. Groups were comparable in terms of demographic variables. Eight percent of the patients did not return for follow-up. Compliance (98%) and side effects (only mild to moderate) in the two groups were comparable. Per-protocol cure rates were 83.5% (E20-7d), 84.8% (E40-7d), and 88.2% (E40-10d). Intention-to-treat cure rates were, respectively, 74%, 78%, and 80% (nonstatistically significant differences). CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole-based triple therapies offer comparable efficacy to omeprazole-based therapies used in previous studies. Increasing the dose of esomeprazole or prolonging the treatment does not improve the results. Therefore, if esomeprazole-based triple therapy is used in duodenal ulcer patients, a regimen with only 20 mg twice daily of esomeprazole and for only 7 days may be sufficient.

Amoxicillin↗
PubMed2005

Intravenous esomeprazole (40 mg and 20 mg) inhibits gastric acid secretion as effectively as oral esomeprazole: results of two randomized clinical studies.

OBJECTIVES: Two studies compared the effects of intravenous (i.v.) and oral esomeprazole (40 mg and 20 mg) on gastric acid suppression and pharmacokinetics after both single (day 1) and repeated (day 5) dosing. METHODS: Two randomized, two-way, cross-over, comparative studies of similar design were performed in healthy male and female volunteers. In both studies, subjects received esomeprazole as a 30-min i.v. infusion or orally once-daily for 5 days, separated by a wash-out period of at least 13 days. In one study, which was double-blind (double dummy), subjects received 40 mg esomeprazole. In the other open study, subjects were given 20 mg esomeprazole. RESULTS: In total, 40 and 24 subjects were randomized for treatment with 40 mg and 20 mg esomeprazole, respectively. No significant differences were found between i.v or oral administration of esomeprazole with respect to the amount of time with mean intragastric pH>4 throughout day 1 or day 5 of treatment in the 40 mg study (day 1, 10.1 h and 8.8 h versus day 5, 15.9 h and 15.3 h, respectively) and the 20 mg study (day 1, 7.3 h and 6.6 h versus day 5, 11.9 h and 12.3 h, respectively). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve values were higher following i.v. relative to oral administration on day 1 of dosing, with less pronounced differences after repeated (day 5) dosing. Both administration routes were similarly well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole, 40 mg and 20 mg i.v., provides similar levels of intragastric acid control on both day 1 and day 5 of treatment compared with oral administration.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Esomeprazole MUPS 40 mg tablets and esomeprazole MUPS 40 mg tablets encapsulated in hard gelatine are bioequivalent.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the bioequivalence of esomeprazole MUPS 40 mg tablets administered with and without a hard gelatine capsule. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Bioequivalence of the esomeprazole MUPS 40 mg tablet administered without (Reference) and with a hard gelatine capsule (Test) was evaluated using a randomized, two-period crossover study. In each study period 49 healthy male Caucasian subjects received a single oral dose of 40 mg esomeprazole. Blood samples were collected at specified time intervals, and serum was separated and analyzed for esomeprazole concentrations using a validated HPLC-MS method. The primary parameters were AUC (extent of absorption) and Cmax (rate of absorption). The time-to-peak plasma concentration, tmax, and the elimination half-life, t1/2, were determined as secondary characteristics. Point estimates and 90%-confidence intervals were obtained for the ratio of the population medians of Test and Reference, using a multiplicative model and a parametric analysis except in the case of tmax, where an additive model and a non-parametric analysis was used. Bioequivalence of Test and Reference was concluded if the 90%-confidence intervals were entirely within the predefined equivalence ranges. RESULTS: The AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax-ratios (Test/Reference) were 1.00 and 1.01, respectively. The 90%-confidence intervals for AUC(0-infinity) (0.94-1.06) and Cmax (0.93-1.09) of these ratios were within the predefined equivalence range of 0.80-1.25 and 0.75-1.33, respectively. The ratios and 90%-confidence intervals of the secondary characteristics t1/2 and tmax were also within the respective predefined equivalence ranges. Both esomeprazole formulations were well tolerated and safe. CONCLUSION: The encapsulation of esomeprazole MUPS 40 mg tablets does not influence the extent and rate of absorption assessed by using AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax. Thus, bioequivalence could be demonstrated.

Absorption↗
PubMed2000

Esomeprazole improves healing and symptom resolution as compared with omeprazole in reflux oesophagitis patients: a randomized controlled trial. The Esomeprazole Study Investigators.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacologic profile of the new proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole has demonstrated advantages over omeprazole that suggest clinical benefits for patients with acid-related disease. METHODS: 1960 patients with endoscopy-confirmed reflux oesophagitis (RO) were randomized to once daily esomeprazole 40 mg (n=654) or 20 mg (n=656), or omeprazole 20 mg (n=650), the standard recommended dose for RO, for up to 8 weeks in a US, multicentre, double-blind trial. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients healed at week 8. Secondary variables included healing and heartburn resolution at week 4, time to first resolution and sustained resolution of heartburn, and per cent of heartburn-free days and nights. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. RESULTS: Significantly more patients were healed at week 8 with esomeprazole 40 mg (94.1%) and 20 mg (89.9%) vs. omeprazole 20 mg (86.9%), using cumulative life table estimates, ITT analysis (each P < 0.05). Esomeprazole 40 mg was also significantly more effective than omeprazole for healing at week 4 and for all secondary variables evaluating heartburn resolution. The most common adverse events in all treatment groups were headache, abdominal pain and diarrhoea. CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole was more effective than omeprazole in healing and symptom resolution in GERD patients with reflux oesophagitis, and had a tolerability profile comparable to that of omeprazole.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Esomeprazole: a review of its use in the management of acid-related disorders.

UNLABELLED: Esomeprazole (S-isomer of omeprazole), the first single optical isomer proton pump inhibitor, generally provides better acid control than current racemic proton pump inhibitors and has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile relative to omeprazole. In a large well designed 8-week trial in patients (n >5000) with erosive oesophagitis, esomeprazole recipients achieved significantly higher rates of endoscopically confirmed healed oesophagitis than those receiving lansoprazole. Respective healed oesophagitis rates with once-daily esomeprazole 40mg or lansoprazole 30mg were 92.6 and 88.8%. Overall, esomeprazole was also better than omeprazole, although these differences were not always statistically significance. Ninety-two to 94% of esomeprazole recipients (40mg once daily) achieved healed oesophagitis versus 84 to 90% of omeprazole recipients (20mg once daily). Esomeprazole was effective across all baseline grades of oesophagitis; notably, relative to lansoprazole, as baseline severity of disease increased, the difference in rates of healed oesophagitis also increased in favour of esomeprazole. Resolution of heartburn was also significantly better with esomeprazole 40mg than with these racemic proton pump inhibitors. Long-term (up to 12 months) therapy with esomeprazole effectively maintained healing in these patients. Once-daily esomeprazole 20 or 40mg for 4 weeks resolved symptoms in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) without oesophagitis. Symptoms were effectively managed in the long-term with symptom-driven on-demand esomeprazole (20 or 40mg once daily). Eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection is considered pivotal to successfully managing duodenal ulcer disease. Seven days' treatment (twice-daily esomeprazole 20mg plus amoxicillin 1g and clarithromycin 500mg) eradicated H. pylori in >/=86% of patients (intention-to-treat), a rate that was similar to equivalent omeprazole-based regimens. Esomeprazole is generally well tolerated, both as monotherapy and in combination with antimicrobial agents, with a tolerability profile similar to that of other proton pump inhibitors. Few patients discontinued therapy because of treatment-emergent adverse events (<3% of patients), with very few (<1%) drug-related serious adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole is an effective, well tolerated treatment for managing GORD and for eradicating H. pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer disease. In 8-week double-blind trials, esomeprazole healed oesophagitis and resolved symptoms in patients with endoscopically confirmed erosive oesophagitis and overall, provided better efficacy than omeprazole. Notably, in a large (n >5000 patients) double-blind trial, esomeprazole 40mg provided significantly better efficacy than lansoprazole in terms of healing rates and resolution of symptoms. Long-term therapy with esomeprazole maintained healed oesophagitis in these patients. Esomeprazole also proved beneficial in patients with symptomatic GORD without oesophagitis. Thus, esomeprazole has emerged as an option for first-line therapy in the management of acid-related disorders.

Databases, Bibliographic↗
PubMed2002

Esomeprazole: a review of its use in the management of acid-related disorders in the US.

UNLABELLED: Esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole, is the first proton pump inhibitor to be developed as a single optical isomer. It provides better acid control than current racemic proton pump inhibitors and has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile relative to omeprazole. In large well designed 8-week trials in patients with erosive oesophagitis, esomeprazole recipients achieved significantly higher rates of endoscopically confirmed healed oesophagitis than those receiving omeprazole or lansoprazole. Esomeprazole was effective across all baseline grades of oesophagitis; notably, relative to lansoprazole, as the baseline severity of disease increased, the difference in rates of healed oesophagitis also increased in favour of esomeprazole. In two trials, 94% of patients receiving esomeprazole 40mg once daily achieved healed oesophagitis versus 84 to 87% of omeprazole recipients (20mg once daily). In a study in >5000 patients, respective healed oesophagitis rates with once-daily esomeprazole 40mg or lansoprazole 30mg were 92.6 and 88.8%. Resolution of heartburn was also significantly better with esomeprazole than with these racemic proton pump inhibitors. Long-term (up to 12 months) therapy with esomeprazole effectively maintained healed oesophagitis in these patients. Esomeprazole 20 or 40mg once daily for 4 weeks proved effective in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) without oesophagitis. Eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection is considered pivotal to successfully managing duodenal ulcer disease. Ten days' triple therapy (esomeprazole 40mg once daily, plus twice-daily amoxicillin 1g and clarithromycin 500mg) eradicated H. pylori in 77 to 78% of patients (intention-to-treat) with endoscopically confirmed duodenal ulcer disease. Esomeprazole is generally well tolerated, both as monotherapy and in combination with antimicrobial agents. The tolerability profile is similar to that of other proton pump inhibitors. Few patients discontinued therapy because of treatment-emergent adverse events (<3% of patients) and very few (<1%) drug-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole is an effective and well tolerated treatment for managing GORD and for eradicating H. pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer disease. In 8-week double-blind trials, esomeprazole effectively healed oesophagitis and resolved symptoms in patients with endoscopically confirmed erosive oesophagitis. Notably, in large (n >1900 patients) double-blind trials, esomeprazole provided significantly better efficacy than omeprazole or lansoprazole in terms of both healing rates and resolution of symptoms. Long-term therapy with esomeprazole effectively maintained healed oesophagitis in these patients. Esomeprazole was also effective in patients with symptomatic GORD. Thus, esomeprazole has emerged as an effective option for first-line therapy in the management of acid-related disorders.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Pharmacokinetic studies with esomeprazole, the (S)-isomer of omeprazole.

This article reviews the pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole, the (S)-isomer of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) omeprazole. Esomeprazole is the first single isomer PPI developed for the treatment of patients with acid-related diseases. In vitro experiments in human liver microsomes demonstrated that the formation of the hydroxy and 5-O-desmethyl metabolites of esomeprazole is via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19, whereas that of the sulphone metabolite is via CYP3A4. The formation rate of the hydroxy metabolite from esomeprazole is lower than for (R)-omeprazole, but that of the 2 other metabolites is higher, demonstrating stereoselective metabolism. The sum of the intrinsic clearances of all 3 metabo- lites for esomeprazole was one-third of that for (R)-omeprazole, suggesting lower clearance of esomeprazole in vivo. In vivo investigations demonstrated that esomeprazole is chirally stable after administration. Esomeprazole is 97% bound to plasma proteins. In normal (extensive) metabolisers with regard to CYP2C19, esomeprazole is metabolised more slowly than omeprazole, resulting in a higher area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) after administration of the same dose. This is more pronounced after repeated administration rather than after a single dose. In poor metabolisers, the AUC is lower for esomeprazole than for omeprazole, contributing to less overall interindividual variability for esomeprazole than for omeprazole. In general, esomeprazole and omeprazole are subject to the same metabolic transformations. Almost complete recoveries were reported and the ratio between urinary and faecal excretion is about 4:1 for both compounds. The dose-dependent increase in AUC of esomeprazole with repeated administration results from a combination of decreased first-pass elimination and decreased systemic clearance. Patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease exhibit a pharmacokinetic pattern similar to that in healthy individuals, whereas elderly individuals exhibited a slightly lower metabolism rate. Patients with a severe deficit in their liver function had a lower rate of metabolism, as would be expected, whereas those with mild to moderate liver disease did not exhibit any alteration in the pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole in individuals with impaired renal function is unlikely to differ from that in healthy individuals. A slight sex difference in the pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole was demonstrated in that the AUC and peak plasma drug concentration were slightly, but not statistically significantly, higher in females than in males.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Esomeprazole 40 mg provides more effective intragastric acid control than lansoprazole 30 mg, omeprazole 20 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg and rabeprazole 20 mg in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of esomeprazole 40 mg with lansoprazole 30 mg, omeprazole 20 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg and rabeprazole 20 mg on intragastric pH during single and repeated dosing in four separate studies in patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disorder (GERD). METHODS: In four randomised crossover studies, patients with symptoms of GERD received once-daily treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg (study A), omeprazole 20 mg (study B), pantoprazole 40 mg (study C) and rabeprazole 20 mg (study D) for 5 days. Continuous 24-h intragastric pH recording was performed on days 1 (except study B) and 5. Percentage of time over 24 h with intragastric pH greater than 4, 24-h median pH and the proportion of patients with pH greater than 4 for greater than or equal to 12 h and 16 h during the 24-h recording periods were investigated. RESULTS: In all four studies, esomeprazole 40 mg OD maintained intragastric pH greater than 4 for a significantly higher mean percentage of the 24-h period compared with all other proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on days 1 (esomeprazole 40.6% versus lansoprazole 33.4%, P=0.0182; esomeprazole 50.3% versus pantoprazole 29.1%, P<0.001; esomeprazole 41.0% versus rabeprazole 29.4%, P=0.002) and 5 (esomeprazole 57.7% versus lansoprazole 44.5%, P<0.0001; esomeprazole 69.8% versus omeprazole 43.7%, P<0.0001; esomeprazole 67.0% versus pantoprazole 44.8%, P<0.001; esomeprazole 59.4% versus rabeprazole 44.5%, P<0.0001). Higher 24-h median pH and a higher proportion of patients with intragastric pH greater than 4 for greater than or equal to 12 h and 16 h were reported with esomeprazole 40 mg OD than with all the other PPIs in each study. CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole 40 mg provides greater acid control in more patients and maintains intragastric pH greater than 4 for a longer period than lansoprazole 30 mg, omeprazole 20 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg and rabeprazole 20 mg in patients with symptoms of GERD.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗
PubMed2002

Esomeprazole for acid peptic disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of esomeprazole, a new proton-pump inhibitor (PPI). DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1966-March 2001) was conducted for relevant literature using the terms esomeprazole, Nexium, and H199/18. Abstracts from the XXXII Nordic Meeting of Gastroenterology and journal articles provided by AstraZeneca were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All available studies on the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of esomeprazole were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Esomeprazole is a new PPI and is the S-isomer of racemic omeprazole. Esomeprazole has demonstrated acid control comparable to that of the other PPIs currently available. Esomeprazole undergoes less hepatic metabolism compared with omeprazole, and thus may result in less interpatient variability among slow and fast metabolizers of CYP2C19. The oral bioavailability of esomeprazole is approximately 89% with a dose of 40 mg, and the half-life is approximately 1.5 hours. Esomeprazole is effective in the healing of erosive esophagitis, with a rate of healing at week 8 of 93.7% (p < 0.001). In maintenance therapy of healed erosive esophagitis, esomeprazole maintained healing rates >90% (6-mo trial). Esomeprazole is comparable with omeprazole (both in combination with appropriate antibiotics) in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, with eradication rates of 89.7% and 87.8%, respectively. The drug is well tolerated. The few adverse effects associated with esomeprazole are diarrhea, headache, nausea, abdominal pain, respiratory infection, and sinusitis. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole is a safe and effective PPI. It is effective in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Absorption↗
PubMed2000

Pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole after oral and intravenous administration of single and repeated doses to healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To study the pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole, one of the optical isomers of omeprazole, after 20 mg or 40 mg single and repeated oral and intravenous administration to healthy subjects. The main metabolites of esomeprazole were also assessed after the 40-mg oral dose. METHODS: In two separate studies, 16 healthy male subjects and 16 healthy male and female subjects received intravenous doses of 20 mg and 40 mg esomeprazole, respectively, on the first investigation day. After a washout period of 5-14 days, the same doses (20 mg as a solution and 40 mg as a capsule) were given orally for 5 days and then again intravenously on day 6. Blood samples for determination of esomeprazole and its metabolites were collected 12 h or 24 h post-dose and were analysed using normal-phase liquid chromatography with ultraviolet (UV) detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters of esomeprazole and its metabolites were estimated using non-compartmental analysis. Geometric means and ratios of the geometric means together with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Plasma clearance (CL) of esomeprazole decreased from 22 l/h to 16 l/h and from 17 l/h to 9 l/h following repeated dosing of 20 mg and 40 mg, respectively. Total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased (from 1.34 micromol x h/l to 2.55 micromol x h/l) with absolute bioavailability (F) being 50% on day 1 and 68% on day 5 after the 20-mg oral dose. AUC increased (from 4.32 micromol x h/l to 11.21 micromol x h/l) with F being 64% on day 1 and 89% on day 5 after the 40-mg oral dose. The plasma levels for esomeprazole sulphone were substantially higher on day 5 than on day 1, while those for 5-hydroxy esomeprazole were marginally higher on day 5 than on day 1 following repeated oral dosing of 40 mg esomeprazole. No side effects attributable to esomeprazole were noticed. CONCLUSION: The increased AUC of esomeprazole with repeated dosing is probably due to a combination of a decreased first-pass elimination and a decreased systemic clearance.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

A review of the clinical and economic impact of using esomeprazole or lansoprazole for the treatment of erosive esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the treatment of erosive esophagitis has had a major impact on the prescribing budgets of primary care organizations in the United Kingdom. Assessments of the clinical and economic effectiveness of PPIs would provide useful tools for decision-making. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to review the available preclinical and clinical studies comparing esomeprazole with lansoprazole in the healing and maintenance of erosive esophagitis, and to compare the budgeting impact of the 2 strategies. Comparative tolerability was also reviewed. METHODS: MEDLINE (1966-September 2002) and EMBASE (1980-September 2002) were searched for abstracts and articles reporting comparative studies of esomeprazole and lansoprazole. The search terms used were gastroesophageal reflux disease, reflux esophagitis, and proton pump inhibitor; all comparisons of esomeprazole and lansoprazole at any dose were considered. The database search was supplemented based on the authors' familiarity with the literature. RESULTS: The comparative studies that were identified fell into 4 categories: (1) intragastric acid suppression studies; (2) randomized controlled trials in the healing of erosive esophagitis; (3) randomized controlled trials in the maintenance of erosive esophagitis; and (4) health economic analyses. Based on these studies, when healing doses (esomeprazole 40 mg once daily, lansoprazole 30 mg once daily) and low doses (20 and 15 mg once daily, respectively) were compared, esomeprazole was more efficacious than lansoprazole in suppressing acid in the intragastric compartment (both comparisons, P < 0.05). More patients with erosive esophagitis experienced healing at 4 and 8 weeks with esomeprazole 40 mg once daily than with lansoprazole 30 mg once daily (P < 0.001 at 4 and 8 weeks). At 6 months, remission was maintained in more patients receiving esomeprazole 20 mg once daily than in those receiving lansoprazole 15 mg once daily (P < 0.001). No significant differences in tolerability were noted in clinical trials that directly compared the 2 PPIs. When the cost-effectiveness of esomeprazole treatment was compared with that of lansoprazole treatment in the healing and maintenance of erosive esophagitis, the greater efficacy of esomeprazole translated into potential cost savings and better outcomes. CONCLUSION: The currently available comparative data for esomeprazole and lansoprazole indicate clinical and cost-effectiveness advantages for esomeprazole in the healing and maintenance of erosive esophagitis compared with lansoprazole.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗
PubMed2001

Esomeprazole once daily for 6 months is effective therapy for maintaining healed erosive esophagitis and for controlling gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and safety.

OBJECTIVE: Esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole, achieves a significantly greater healing rate and symptom resolution of erosive esophagitis than that achieved by omeprazole. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of the new proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole in preventing relapse over a prolonged period in patients with healed erosive esophagitis. METHODS: A total of 318 gastroesophageal reflux patients whose erosive esophagitis was healed in a comparative study of esomeprazole 40 mg, 20 mg, or omeprazole 20 mg, were randomized to maintenance therapy with once daily esomeprazole 40 mg, 20 mg, or 10 mg, or placebo in a U.S., double-blind multicenter trial. RESULTS: After 6 months, healing was maintained (cumulative life table rates) in 93.6% (95% CI 87.4-99.7) of patients treated with esomeprazole 40 mg, 93.2% (95% CI 87.4-99.0) treated with esomeprazole 20 mg, and 57.1% (95% CI 45.2-69) treated with esomeprazole 10 mg; p < 0.001 vs placebo (29.1%; 95% CI 17.7-40.3). Of patients relapsing, mean time to first recurrence of esophagitis increased with dose, from 34 days (placebo) to 78 days (10 mg), 115 days (20 mg), and 163 days (40 mg). Patients treated with esomeprazole had less frequent and less severe heartburn than those treated with placebo. At month 6, more than 70% of patients being treated with esomeprazole remained symptom-free. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole is effective and well tolerated in the maintenance of a healing erosive esophagitis. Esomeprazole 40 mg and 20 mg maintain healing in over 90% of patients while providing effective control of heartburn symptoms.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Drug interaction studies with esomeprazole, the (S)-isomer of omeprazole.

Esomeprazole, the (S)-isomer of omeprazole, is the first proton pump inhibitor (PPI) developed as a single isomer for the treatment of patients with acid related diseases. Because of the extensive use of PPIs, the documentation of the potential for drug interactions with esomeprazole is of great importance. Altered absorption or metabolism are 2 of the major mechanisms for drug-drug interactions. Since intragastric pH will increase with esomeprazole treatment, it can be hypothesised that the absorption of drugs with pH-sensitive absorption (e.g. digoxin and ketoconazole) may be affected. Esomeprazole does not seem to have any potential to interact with drugs that are metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1 A2, 2A6, 2C9, 2D6 or 2E1. In drug interaction studies with diazepam, phenytoin and (R)-warfarin, it was shown that esomeprazole has the potential to interact with CYP2C19. The slightly altered metabolism of cisapride was also suggested to be the result of inhibition of a minor metabolic pathway for cisapride mediated by CYP2C19. Esomeprazole did not interact with the CYP3A4 substrates clarithromycin (2 studies) or quinidine. Since the slightly increased area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of cisapride could be explained as an inhibition of CYP2C19, the data on these 3 CYP3A4 substrates indicate that esomeprazole does not have the potential to inhibit this enzyme. The minor effects reported for diazepam, phenytoin, (R)-warfarin, and cisapride are unlikely to be of clinical relevance. Clarithromycin interacts with the metabolism of esomeprazole resulting in a doubling of the AUC of esomeprazole. The increased plasma concentrations of esomeprazole are unlikely to have any safety implications. It can be concluded that the potential for drug-drug interactions with esomeprazole is low, and similar to that reported for omeprazole.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗
PubMed2003

Esomeprazole 20 mg and lansoprazole 15 mg in maintaining healed reflux oesophagitis: Metropole study results.

INTRODUCTION: Esomeprazole, the first proton pump inhibitor to be developed as an optical isomer, has demonstrated more effective healing vs. omeprazole and lansoprazole in patients with reflux oesophagitis (RO). However, RO recurs in a high proportion (approximately 80%) of these patients within 12 months of initial therapy, highlighting the importance of maintenance treatment. Previous studies have shown esomeprazole to be effective as maintenance therapy in healed RO patients. AIM: This study was conducted to compare esomeprazole 20 mg once daily (o.d.) with lansoprazole 15 mg o.d. for the prevention of recurrence of RO. METHODS: 1391 patients with endoscopically verified RO (LA classification) were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial. During the initial healing phase of the study, all patients received 4-8 weeks' open treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg: 1236 healed (identified by endoscopy at 4 and 8 weeks) and symptom-free (i.e. no heartburn or acid regurgitation) patients were randomized to 6 months' maintenance treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg o.d. or lansoprazole 15 mg o.d. Time to relapse (relapse of RO and/or discontinuation due to symptom recurrence) was analysed using a log-rank test. RESULTS: Esomeprazole maintained a significantly higher proportion of patients in remission than lansoprazole over the 6-month course of treatment (P < 0.0001, intention-to-treat analysis). After 6 months' treatment, 83% of esomeprazole recipients were in remission compared with 74% of lansoprazole recipients (life-table estimates). Esomeprazole gave a longer time to relapse than lansoprazole irrespective of baseline LA Grade, significantly so for baseline LA Grades B, C and D (P < 0.05 for each comparison). Significantly more patients were free from heartburn in the esomeprazole group compared with the lansoprazole group at 1, 3 and 6 months (P < 0.05). Significant differences at 6 months between esomeprazole 20 mg o.d. and lansoprazole 15 mg o.d. were also observed for control of epigastric pain and acid regurgitation (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). Both treatment regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole 20 mg o.d. is a more effective maintenance treatment than lansoprazole 15 mg o.d. for symptom-free patients with healed RO.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗
PubMed2001

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole.

BACKGROUND: Esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole, is the first proton pump inhibitor developed as a single isomer for the treatment of acid-related diseases. AIM: To examine the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of esomeprazole. METHODS: In a crossover study, 12 healthy males received 5, 10 or 20 mg of esomeprazole, or 20 mg of omeprazole, once daily over 5 days. The pharmacokinetics and effects on pentagastrin-stimulated peak acid output of esomeprazole and omeprazole were studied on days 1 and 5. RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) of both esomeprazole and omeprazole increased from day 1 to day 5. The correlation between acid inhibition and AUC for esomeprazole could be well described with a sigmoid Emax model. The mean inhibition values of the pentagastrin-stimulated peak acid output on day 1 for 5, 10 and 20 mg of esomeprazole were 15%, 29% and 46%, respectively; the corresponding day 5 values were 28%, 62% and 90%. The mean inhibition values of the pentagastrin-stimulated peak acid output for omeprazole were 35% (day 1) to 79% (day 5). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole are time and dose dependent. There was a good correlation between AUC and effect for esomeprazole. These data suggest an increased acid inhibitory effect of esomeprazole compared to omeprazole.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Esomeprazole (40 mg) compared with lansoprazole (30 mg) in the treatment of erosive esophagitis.

OBJECTIVES: Esomeprazole, the S isomer of omeprazole, has been shown to have higher healing rates of erosive esophagitis than omeprazole. This study compared esomeprazole with lansoprazole for the healing of erosive esophagitis and resolution of heartburn. METHODS: This United States multicenter, randomized, double blind, parallel group trial was performed in 5241 adult patients (intent-to-treat population) with endoscopically documented erosive esophagitis, which was graded by severity at baseline (Los Angeles classification). Patients received 40 mg of esomeprazole (n = 2624) or 30 mg of lansoprazole (n = 2617) once daily before breakfast for up to 8 wk. The primary efficacy endpoint was healing of erosive esophagitis at week 8. Secondary assessments included proportion of patients healed at week 4, resolution of investigator-recorded heartburn, time to first and time to sustained resolution of patient diary-recorded heartburn, and proportion of heartburn-free days and nights. RESULTS: Esomeprazole (40 mg) demonstrated significantly higher healing rates (92.6%, 95% CI = 91.5-93.6%) than lansoprazole (30 mg) (88.8%, 95% CI = 87.5-90.0%) at week 8 (p = 0.0001, life-table estimates, intent-to-treat analysis). A significant difference in healing rates favoring esomeprazole was also observed at week 4. The difference in healing rates between esomeprazole and lansoprazole increased as baseline severity of erosive esophagitis increased. Sustained resolution of heartburn occurred faster and in more patients treated with esomeprazole. Sustained resolution of nocturnal heartburn also occurred faster with esomeprazole. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole (40 mg) is more effective than lansoprazole (30 mg) in healing erosive esophagitis and resolving heartburn. Healing rates are consistently high with esomeprazole, irrespective of baseline disease severity.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗
PubMed2006

Prevention of ulcers by esomeprazole in at-risk patients using non-selective NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: Proton pump inhibitors reduce ulcer recurrence in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users, but their impact in at-risk ulcer-free patients using the current spectrum of prescribed agents has not been clearly defined. We assessed esomeprazole for ulcer prevention in at-risk patients (> or = 60 yr and/or ulcer history) taking NSAIDs, including COX-2 inhibitors. Such studies are particularly relevant, given that concerns regarding adverse cardiovascular outcomes among COX-2 inhibitor users may prompt re-evaluation of their use. METHODS: We conducted two similar double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter studies; VENUS (United States) and PLUTO (multinational). A total of 844 and 585 patients requiring daily NSAIDs, including COX-2 inhibitors were randomized to receive esomeprazole (20 or 40 mg) or placebo, daily for 6 months. RESULTS: In the VENUS study, the life table estimated proportion of patients who developed ulcers over 6 months (primary variable, intent-to-treat population) was 20.4% on placebo, 5.3% on esomeprazole 20 mg (p < 0.001), and 4.7% on esomeprazole 40 mg (p < 0.0001). In the PLUTO study, the values were 12.3% on placebo, 5.2% with esomeprazole 20 mg (p = 0.018), and 4.4% with esomeprazole 40 mg (p = 0.007). Significant reductions were observed for users of both non-selective NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors. Pooled ulcer rates for patients using COX-2 inhibitors (n = 400) were 16.5% on placebo, 0.9% on esomeprazole 20 mg (p < 0.001) and 4.1% on esomeprazole 40 mg (p= 0.002). Esomeprazole was well tolerated and associated with better symptom control than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: For at-risk patients, esomeprazole was effective in preventing ulcers in long-term users of NSAIDs, including COX-2 inhibitors.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole following varying intravenous administration rates.

There are situations where the use of an oral proton pump inhibitors is not possible. In such situations an intravenous route is the preferred alternative. An intravenous formulation of esomeprazole has recently been developed. This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of single-dose intravenous esomeprazole using different rates of administration. The study was an open randomised, cross-over design in healthy male and female (n = 24). Esomeprazole 40 mg intravenously was administrated as an infusion over 10, 15, 20 or 30 min., or esomeprazole 20 mg intravenously as an injection over 3 min. There was a wash-out period of at least 6 days between dose regimens. It was demonstrated that increasing the rate of intravenous infusion of esomeprazole 40 mg resulted in higher Cmax values (geometric means; 5.2-7.6 micromol/l), but the AUC values remained relatively constant (7.1-7.2 micromor/l). As expected esomeprazole 20 mg administered as a 3 min. intravenous injection had lower Cmax (3.6 micromol/l) and AUC (2.9 micromol.r/l) values than any of the infusions of esomeprazole 40 mg. Intravenous esomeprazole was well tolerated in this study. In conclusion, any variation in the infusion rate of esomeprazole 40 mg intravenously has little effect on the pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole in healthy volunteers, which provides flexibility in the choice of dosing regimens.

Adult↗